Yes, strange,my ears and my mind were astonished, because there was not a transition from the slow beginning to the fast part. It sounds partly like Beethoven, partly like Bach. But this fugue is interesting. w
You never fail to surprise in ideas! The subject initially seems a bit unbalanced when it jumps from long durations to sixteenths but the "toccata" later handles it quite well and balances it out!
Thank you! (= Yeah, I see how the subject could be perceived as unbalanced at first. I’m glad you say it’s handled well after that, this was the intention. ^^
Bach also had such "unbalanced" subjects with long notes or many rests in first part of subject. But it's up to the counter-subjects to balance the subject out.
"I would like at least one hand to be exercised at any given time. Thank you!" Amazing piece, the algorithm decides to serve me gold every now and again!
Once again, you've come up with a strange but effective fugue. I thought for sure the sudden jump into sixteenth-notes in the subject was going to be a disaster, but it wasn't--it just made the answer sound all the better when it came in in m.8. And you carried the contrast through the entire fugue. I like this one! Keep 'em coming!
First time I see a fugue composed by someone in UA-cam which has a tonal answer when it’s needed. Usually people who share original fugues don’t even know what it is
@@wanderlngdays I usually make a tonal answer if the subject suggests one, but I don’t always follow this rule if I feel like it doesn’t serve the music but rather obstructs it (like in my Raindrop Fugue, where I modulate already before the answer).
Very interesting fugue! It sounds sometimes classically, sometimes like Bach or like some piece from Baroque period, I always always enjoyed that compilation. And overall very nice composition. You are tremendously talented guy!!!
Wow, thank you so much! (= I feel honoured that you play pieces of mine. I hope you are aware that I provide all the scores for free under the following link (so you don’t have to read the notes from the videos). drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/10VoNbD0eKS6mfEcBSMzCIkvGSh0TqAkf
Wow! Like many of the other comments I was at first surprised by the subject, but by the end you really took what you could from it! Bravo! I will be listening to this again and subscribing! Keep up the great work! 👍
Haha, very nice energetic piece! For joke I imagine such a fugue could be written by Domenico Scarlatti and sent to JSB in a birthdays letter and saying " hi Sebastian, can we be friends ?" Lol, just kidding.... love your creativity!!! You are different!
@@averynhiell ohh I didnt know D Scarlattis fugues! I listened to them all now, cat fugue very funny, theme simulating the cats random walk on the keyboard. 🙂 and I found D scarlattis fugal parts in his 10 voice choral work! Maybe you can try some counterpoint on human voice too... sounds very dramatic and deep.
@@alindmay Hmm, interesting suggestion! The problem is, I don’t really like the sound of human voices in the program I use, and I can’t really afford paying actual singers. Do you know a good VST for that? (:
Thanks a lot, Your fugue is so joyful and refreshing! Rhythm tricks are a brilliant idea, I think that Bach, Buxtehude and other masters are happy in heaven!
Storm,..????? Sounds more like struggling to finish a very LONG math worksheet,......on the school bus ...on Your way to school! I never heard such a well disciplined storm ! Really enjoy Your wild IMAGINATION ! EXCELLENT WORK !!!!!!!!!
This contains such elegance and beauty! I sincerely thought Bach composed it. It is only after three weeks of listening to it did I actually take the time to read the title correctly, "ORIGINAL composition." This piece is magnificent.
This would be amazing on the organ. Playing around with different registrations and such would be so exciting! And foot pedals! Lovely work nonetheless
Thank you! (: I’m very limited by the playback of the programs I use. I tried organ, but it just didn’t work for me, so I opted for piano. I have since written a fugue explicitly for organ, though. Feel free to check it out: ua-cam.com/video/RMBdjdiCie8/v-deo.html
@@ben-rosfeld I’m surprisingly satisfied with the possibilities of Musescore. I can find decent-sounding solutions for most instruments, I just didn’t look very hard for organ because I conceived this piece for piano.
One of my spontaneous thoughts too. Have you considered writing or arranging fugues for wind ensembles? That makes the music much more alive - I have heard Bach fugues om brass instruments and that is just amazing to experience the independence of the voices that clearly in an interactive context. There are lots of problems associated with Musescore though, which is unfortunate since the software is over all userfriendly. After working in Musescore for several years, I finally decided to start working in Finale instead last year.
Wow... I now next to nothing about Fugues, but after hearing this I'm thinking I need to go and do some studying! I have no idea how this Composition works at all, but this Fugue just sounds so good! Very beautiful and fun to listen to, I'm excited to listen to more of your Fugues Averyn!
Thank you so much, I really appreciate it! (= I have found it especially hard to impress someone who doesn’t know the music theory behind fugues, so this means a lot to me.
Impressive handling of an unusual subject! Loved the way you interwove the inverted subject almost surreptitiously amidst the regular subject entries. Good stuff, keep up the good work! P.S. This really deserves to be played by a real pianist for better expression. Repeated notes just don't sound good in computer playback. You might need to work on the dynamic markings a little for a human player; some parts are overspecified (but I understand they are necessary to work around computer playback limitations).
Thank you so much, I appreciate it! ^^ Yes, I would love for it to be played by a pianist, but I can’t really afford that at the moment. As for the dynamic markings: I don’t have much experience in how to handle dynamics in a piece, I’m mostly winging this part. If you know any helpful resources about that, I’d be much obliged. (:
@@averynhiell As I understand it you don't play the piano yourself, so this would be a bit difficult to explain. (But IMHO it would help your composition skills a great deal if you at least learned some basics of the instrument; it would give you great insight into why certain things are written a certain way in the classics like Bach). But in a nutshell, unlike computer playback, when you're dealing with a live player, dynamics are not absolute. "mf" in one context can be louder or softer depending on the surrounding material, and often also the mood and experience of the pianist. As such, rather than thinking of dynamics as some fixed sound volume, it's much more useful to think of them as the *manner* in which you want the pianist to play. For example, "mf" means "play in the usual manner", i.e., your typical average piano intonation. "mp" means "play somewhat more gently than mf". And "f" means "hammer on the keys", and "ff" means "hammer on the keys *really* hard like there's no tomorrow", whereas "p" means "play gently and calmly" and "pp" means "play extremely gently like you're tiptoeing". Don't worry too much about the actual volume the pianist will play at; that's their job, let them figure it out themselves. More important is the manner in which they will play, since this is what will give the right expression to the music. Secondly, unlike computers, pianists aren't dumb (at least good pianists aren't haha); they generally know which notes to emphasize (down beats, climactic notes, etc). So you don't need to write so many dynamics; only where it may not be immediately obvious from the notes themselves. This includes crescendos and diminuendos: if you look at, say, a Beethoven piano sonata score, you'll see a lot of hairpins without any explicit dynamics. If you read the score, it's pretty obvious what Beethoven intended (crescendo for those group of notes, then go back to whatever the ambient dynamic was). A computer, however, doesn't understand this, so you have to spell it out always ("< mf" -- increase volume until mf, "> pp" - decrease volume until pp, etc.). For a score intended for a human player, a lot of this can be left out unless it's ambiguous, or you want something unexpected (e.g., crescendo and sudden pp at the end). It's hard to explain exactly when you need to be specific and when not to, though, if you don't play the piano yourself. The best way is probably to learn how to play it, at least to a basic level. ;-) Either that, or study piano scores and see how others notated their dynamics and how it sounds in a performance. Sorry for the info dump. Hope this helps.
@@ШуточноназываемыйВладимир Wow, thanks a lot for your comprehensive explanation! (= This helps indeed. I did have piano lessons for a dozen or so years, but not to a point where dynamics mattered a lot. Of course, the dynamics I notate are, as you said, mostly to make the playback sound a bit more alive. But I will keep in mind what you told me for future pieces. (:
@@yukoyukooko Thank you! ^^ I have a few Picardy thirds throughout my pieces, but usually, I prefer to end in minor. I go pretty much by intuition there.
how long did it take you to write this? i've been inspired to try to write a fugue after seeing your work, but after a couple hours i only have about 30 seconds of material
I feel honoured that my work has inspired you! (= This one took me a few weeks due to longer pauses in between. But I usually only need a couple of days (if I’m inspired enough to finish it, that is). Have you had lessons in counterpoint and fugal composition? Or have you taught it to yourself? Without proper understanding it’s not really possible to write a fugue, both because counterpoint is essential for it and because you need to know the structure and techniques of fugues. I’m asking because in an earlier comment you asked me how I learned it. (:
@@averynhiell i don't really have any composition training, i've kind of been experimenting for the last 6 years - mostly with electronic music - and as of late became interested in baroque music. if it's not too much trouble for you, could i email you what i have so far for you to check out?
@@obonyxiam I had a very similar background before I started fugue tution. I will try to have a look at your work and see if I can help you with anything. You can find my mail address in the channel description. (:
thanks for your work, it is inspiring. A non technical question: how it would be if played on organ? Or did you write it specifically for the piano? Could you upload a version with (simulated) organ?
Thank you, I appreciate it! (: I am not trained in writing for organ. I wrote the fugue specifically for piano, the broken pedal points and Alberti bass-style writing is more idiomatic for harpsichord or piano afaik. I’m not sure if it would work on an organ (on a simulated organ no less).
I have had a private music teacher for almost three years now who taught me most of what I know about music theory. Before that, I had piano lessons for a dozen or so years but learnt very little compared to the last three years.
@@Columbashaw Be my guest. (: Although I’ve already tried and it didn’t work as well as I had expected. But if you come up with something decent, feel free to share it with me (my mail is in the channel description). (:
@@rubm3907 In some of my videos, I use Musescore 4, with special VSTs/soundfonts. But somehow, the dynamics are very weak, at least in the soundfonts I have tried out. So, if I want a fugue to have very expressive dynamics, I fall back on Musescore 3. Was that your question?
@@rubm3907 Ah, I see! ^^ There are a few MIDI-renditions of different pieces on my channel: ua-cam.com/play/PLCpNpMDytYKPukMxYiCRXsPDD4iApyAGA.html&si=pZQqBqdlempj_5f2 But I didn’t create them. Some of them were made by freelancers from Fiverr who I had actually paid to play them manually. When I uploaded the recordings, someone pointed out to me that they are most certainly mockups. The same person then created mockups of two or three other pieces for free, but it didn’t seem worth the effort at some point. And I’m not tech-savvy nor interested enough to attempt to learn it myself. 🙈
Thank you! (= Of course, I would feel honoured. If you need a score for any of them, feel free to send me an e-mail, the address is in the channel description. Earlier pieces have a link to a MuseScore score.
The counterpoints were well enough, but there were an abuse of simple accompaiments that made some parts boring. Weirdly, it reminded me of some failures i had trying to write baroque compositions with counterpoints
I know what you mean by ‘simple accompaniment’, I was experimenting with something different this time. Whether it’s boring or not is of course subjective, but I see your point. (:
@@averynhiell Я бы хотел возыметь ваши навыки в полифонии и подобно группе Rhapsody of fire. Сочинить средневековую мелодию распоряжаясь подголосками мелодии. Я уже сочинял в подобном стиле но я не имею к сожалению конкретного муз образования. Но могу показать что я сочинил, прислав вам фото а социальную сеть. Сейчас я начал работу над аранжировкой песни этой группы. Но совмещать учёбу и другие дела сложно. Но я буду стараться!
@@averynhiell Ну хорошо, а расскажите как вы добились таких успехов что заканчивали вы щас учитесь, на кого на композитора или кого. Расскажите про себя?
@@antonprokopenko6755 У меня есть частный преподаватель, который учит меня контрапунктической композиции. Мы используем книги и другие материалы, но я не знаю никаких ресурсов на русском языке, извините. Если вы хотите изучать это в университете, вам стоит поискать "композиция" или "теория музыки". Надеюсь, это поможет! (:
this is one of the strangest fugue subjects I've heard but this is also one of the most amazing fugues I've heard!
Thank you so much, this means a lot to me! (=
Yes, strange,my ears and my mind were astonished, because there was not a transition from the slow beginning to the fast part. It sounds partly like Beethoven, partly like Bach. But this fugue is interesting.
w
@@SusanneStechow-r6n Thank you! (:
You never fail to surprise in ideas! The subject initially seems a bit unbalanced when it jumps from long durations to sixteenths but the "toccata" later handles it quite well and balances it out!
Thank you! (=
Yeah, I see how the subject could be perceived as unbalanced at first. I’m glad you say it’s handled well after that, this was the intention. ^^
Bach also had such "unbalanced" subjects with long notes or many rests in first part of subject. But it's up to the counter-subjects to balance the subject out.
I don't know why UA-cam recommended this to me, but I'm glad they did.
@@malcolmdale9607 Thank you, I appreciate it! ^^
"I would like at least one hand to be exercised at any given time. Thank you!"
Amazing piece, the algorithm decides to serve me gold every now and again!
@@Dokattak Thank you so much! (=
that fugue subject is CRAZY lol, absolutely fantastic work making it work.
@@ekenyon51416 Thank you so much! =D
Once again, you've come up with a strange but effective fugue. I thought for sure the sudden jump into sixteenth-notes in the subject was going to be a disaster, but it wasn't--it just made the answer sound all the better when it came in in m.8. And you carried the contrast through the entire fugue. I like this one! Keep 'em coming!
Thank you so much, your comment made my day! (= I’m so glad you find the jump to 16ths effective, I had really hoped that it works well.
First time I see a fugue composed by someone in UA-cam which has a tonal answer when it’s needed. Usually people who share original fugues don’t even know what it is
@@wanderlngdays I usually make a tonal answer if the subject suggests one, but I don’t always follow this rule if I feel like it doesn’t serve the music but rather obstructs it (like in my Raindrop Fugue, where I modulate already before the answer).
That trill gets me every time. It's an amazing composition. I think I'm going to try and write one. I guess I'll plunge right in and write one.
Thank you so much! I love to inspire others and give them the urge to write a fugue, give them the nerve to write a fugue.
@@averynhiell😂
just forget the rules and have a try,
Simply impressive👏🏻
Thanks a lot! ^^
Very interesting fugue! It sounds sometimes classically, sometimes like Bach or like some piece from Baroque period, I always always enjoyed that compilation. And overall very nice composition. You are tremendously talented guy!!!
Thank you so much, I appreciate it! (=
AMAZING WORK!!! As someone who aspires to compose like this one day these videos of yours are a great inspiration for me. Keep up the amazing work!
@@Michevangelo03 Thank you so much, I really appreciate it! Every time someone feels inspired by my music, it means a lot to me. ^^
Se ci sono cinque visualizzazioni in più, e perchè l'ho ascoltata io cinque volte. molto bella, grazie!!
Grazie, lo apprezzo molto! (=
I've been playing some of your compositions on my piano and I just love how it's written! It's written so well!
Wow, thank you so much! (=
I feel honoured that you play pieces of mine. I hope you are aware that I provide all the scores for free under the following link (so you don’t have to read the notes from the videos). drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/10VoNbD0eKS6mfEcBSMzCIkvGSh0TqAkf
Wow! Like many of the other comments I was at first surprised by the subject, but by the end you really took what you could from it! Bravo! I will be listening to this again and subscribing! Keep up the great work! 👍
@@tobinluto Thanks a lot, I really appreciate that! (=
Haha, very nice energetic piece! For joke I imagine such a fugue could be written by Domenico Scarlatti and sent to JSB in a birthdays letter and saying " hi Sebastian, can we be friends ?" Lol, just kidding.... love your creativity!!! You are different!
xD Thank you so much, I appreciate it! I love Scarlatti’s Cat Fugue. ^^
@@averynhiell ohh I didnt know D Scarlattis fugues! I listened to them all now, cat fugue very funny, theme simulating the cats random walk on the keyboard. 🙂 and I found D scarlattis fugal parts in his 10 voice choral work! Maybe you can try some counterpoint on human voice too... sounds very dramatic and deep.
@@alindmay Hmm, interesting suggestion! The problem is, I don’t really like the sound of human voices in the program I use, and I can’t really afford paying actual singers. Do you know a good VST for that? (:
Thanks a lot, Your fugue is so joyful and refreshing! Rhythm tricks are a brilliant idea, I think that Bach, Buxtehude and other masters are happy in heaven!
Thanks a lot, I appreciate it! (=
What exactly do you mean by “rhythm tricks”?
Storm,..????? Sounds more like struggling to finish a very LONG math worksheet,......on the school bus ...on Your way to school! I never heard such a well disciplined storm ! Really enjoy Your wild IMAGINATION ! EXCELLENT WORK !!!!!!!!!
Thanks a lot, interesting associations! ^^
It is wonderful to see a fellow composer with such talent. Wonderful work, my friend!
Thank you so much, I appreciate it! :D
@@averynhiell Certainly!
This contains such elegance and beauty! I sincerely thought Bach composed it. It is only after three weeks of listening to it did I actually take the time to read the title correctly, "ORIGINAL composition." This piece is magnificent.
@@BibleReadingasinHeaven Wow, thank you so much, this means a lot to me!
:)
Amazing work, love the counter subject and the ending, it's awesome
Thank you so much, I really appreciate it! ^^
Wow. Really well done. Fascinating throughout, and the dynamics are brilliant. I really wanted that G1 at the end, though. LOL
Thank you so much! (=
I agree, a G1 would have sounded nice there, and it would have been no problem to add it.
Magnificent collection of ideas.
@@BANERJEEWB Thank you so much! :D
I love how the subject doubles as a pedal point during parts of the piece. Awesome stuff
@@mintchoco5640 Thanks a lot! You have a good eye for spotting that. ^^
This would be amazing on the organ. Playing around with different registrations and such would be so exciting! And foot pedals! Lovely work nonetheless
Thank you! (:
I’m very limited by the playback of the programs I use. I tried organ, but it just didn’t work for me, so I opted for piano. I have since written a fugue explicitly for organ, though. Feel free to check it out: ua-cam.com/video/RMBdjdiCie8/v-deo.html
@@averynhiell feel that hard as a composer myself. MIDI playback just doesn't do it justice majority of the time. I'll check out the organ piece!
@@ben-rosfeld I’m surprisingly satisfied with the possibilities of Musescore. I can find decent-sounding solutions for most instruments, I just didn’t look very hard for organ because I conceived this piece for piano.
One of my spontaneous thoughts too. Have you considered writing or arranging fugues for wind ensembles? That makes the music much more alive - I have heard Bach fugues om brass instruments and that is just amazing to experience the independence of the voices that clearly in an interactive context.
There are lots of problems associated with Musescore though, which is unfortunate since the software is over all userfriendly. After working in Musescore for several years, I finally decided to start working in Finale instead last year.
the best fugue i've heard!
@@lotavio343 Thank you so much! :D
a true master composer you are. bravo.
Thank you so much! (=
I am glad this got recommended :)
@@astrogersunited5389 Thank you! ^^
Wow, I aspire to be like you in compositional standards.
@@Chipsomedip Thanks a lot, I feel honoured!
this is wonderful. very original composition.
@@alfenrissilverhide9886 Thank you so much, I appreciate it! ^-^
Sounds like a synthesis of Bach and Romantic brillant style.
@romualdandrzejczak4093 Thanks a lot! :D
Excellent!
Thanks a lot! ^^
Bellissima!
Grazie mille! (=
very risky subject but it panned out great. lovely fugue, congratulations!
@@ebu6880 Thank you! I get that a lot. xD
@@averynhiell yeah because it's impressive LOL it would've taken me quite a bit of work to come up with a solution for a subject like that
@ Thank you so much, I really appreciate that! ^^
Excellent work. This is how ancient music is evolving in modern times. Hats off for mastering the ancient styles.
@@BANERJEEWB Thanks a lot! (=
I wouldn’t go as far as to say I have mastered them, but I appreciate it.
Loved it, well done indeed!!
@@hear-and-know Thanks a lot! (=
really good, I would be happy with this programmed at a recital.
Thanks a lot! :D
this is amazing! well done!! ❤️
Thank you, I appreciate it! 💜
Awesome contrapunctus!
@@Ambidextroid Thank you so much! (=
Subbbed.
One composer to the next.
We strive on.
Thank you! (:
amazing fugue
Thanks a lot! (=
Wow... I now next to nothing about Fugues, but after hearing this I'm thinking I need to go and do some studying! I have no idea how this Composition works at all, but this Fugue just sounds so good! Very beautiful and fun to listen to, I'm excited to listen to more of your Fugues Averyn!
Thank you so much, I really appreciate it! (=
I have found it especially hard to impress someone who doesn’t know the music theory behind fugues, so this means a lot to me.
this is sick asf
Thanks a lot! :D
Impressive handling of an unusual subject! Loved the way you interwove the inverted subject almost surreptitiously amidst the regular subject entries. Good stuff, keep up the good work!
P.S. This really deserves to be played by a real pianist for better expression. Repeated notes just don't sound good in computer playback. You might need to work on the dynamic markings a little for a human player; some parts are overspecified (but I understand they are necessary to work around computer playback limitations).
Thank you so much, I appreciate it! ^^
Yes, I would love for it to be played by a pianist, but I can’t really afford that at the moment. As for the dynamic markings: I don’t have much experience in how to handle dynamics in a piece, I’m mostly winging this part. If you know any helpful resources about that, I’d be much obliged. (:
@@averynhiell As I understand it you don't play the piano yourself, so this would be a bit difficult to explain. (But IMHO it would help your composition skills a great deal if you at least learned some basics of the instrument; it would give you great insight into why certain things are written a certain way in the classics like Bach).
But in a nutshell, unlike computer playback, when you're dealing with a live player, dynamics are not absolute. "mf" in one context can be louder or softer depending on the surrounding material, and often also the mood and experience of the pianist. As such, rather than thinking of dynamics as some fixed sound volume, it's much more useful to think of them as the *manner* in which you want the pianist to play.
For example, "mf" means "play in the usual manner", i.e., your typical average piano intonation. "mp" means "play somewhat more gently than mf". And "f" means "hammer on the keys", and "ff" means "hammer on the keys *really* hard like there's no tomorrow", whereas "p" means "play gently and calmly" and "pp" means "play extremely gently like you're tiptoeing". Don't worry too much about the actual volume the pianist will play at; that's their job, let them figure it out themselves. More important is the manner in which they will play, since this is what will give the right expression to the music.
Secondly, unlike computers, pianists aren't dumb (at least good pianists aren't haha); they generally know which notes to emphasize (down beats, climactic notes, etc). So you don't need to write so many dynamics; only where it may not be immediately obvious from the notes themselves.
This includes crescendos and diminuendos: if you look at, say, a Beethoven piano sonata score, you'll see a lot of hairpins without any explicit dynamics. If you read the score, it's pretty obvious what Beethoven intended (crescendo for those group of notes, then go back to whatever the ambient dynamic was). A computer, however, doesn't understand this, so you have to spell it out always ("< mf" -- increase volume until mf, "> pp" - decrease volume until pp, etc.). For a score intended for a human player, a lot of this can be left out unless it's ambiguous, or you want something unexpected (e.g., crescendo and sudden pp at the end).
It's hard to explain exactly when you need to be specific and when not to, though, if you don't play the piano yourself. The best way is probably to learn how to play it, at least to a basic level. ;-) Either that, or study piano scores and see how others notated their dynamics and how it sounds in a performance.
Sorry for the info dump. Hope this helps.
@@ШуточноназываемыйВладимир Wow, thanks a lot for your comprehensive explanation! (= This helps indeed. I did have piano lessons for a dozen or so years, but not to a point where dynamics mattered a lot. Of course, the dynamics I notate are, as you said, mostly to make the playback sound a bit more alive. But I will keep in mind what you told me for future pieces. (:
ironically ending in minor is alot more original than ending in picardy third lool. cool stuff!
@@yukoyukooko Thank you! ^^
I have a few Picardy thirds throughout my pieces, but usually, I prefer to end in minor. I go pretty much by intuition there.
I LOVE THIS
A bit sceptical when hearing that subject but holy shiit you're cooking with it, amazing fugue
@@trongdung1306 I get that a lot, lol. Thank you so much! ^^
Cool !
Thank you! (:
Breathtaking😄
@@sugarpacketchad Thanks a lot! (=
how long did it take you to write this? i've been inspired to try to write a fugue after seeing your work, but after a couple hours i only have about 30 seconds of material
I feel honoured that my work has inspired you! (=
This one took me a few weeks due to longer pauses in between. But I usually only need a couple of days (if I’m inspired enough to finish it, that is).
Have you had lessons in counterpoint and fugal composition? Or have you taught it to yourself? Without proper understanding it’s not really possible to write a fugue, both because counterpoint is essential for it and because you need to know the structure and techniques of fugues. I’m asking because in an earlier comment you asked me how I learned it. (:
@@averynhiell i don't really have any composition training, i've kind of been experimenting for the last 6 years - mostly with electronic music - and as of late became interested in baroque music. if it's not too much trouble for you, could i email you what i have so far for you to check out?
@@obonyxiam I had a very similar background before I started fugue tution. I will try to have a look at your work and see if I can help you with anything. You can find my mail address in the channel description. (:
Great stuff!
@@NickOleksiakMusic Thank you! (=
beautiful!
Thanks! ^^
Amazing i love it !
Thanks a lot, I appreciate it! ^^
The is absolutely brilliant. I am serious.
Thank you so much! I really appreciate it. (=
Very nice!
Thank you! ^^
Pretty awesome.
Thank you! ^^
This fugue written in artistic manners, but... Ornaments... Forget the word, fuck! Sounds excellent, but... FUCK!!! FORGET THE WORD!!!
Thank you! (:
Amazing
@@Kontorskiy2024 Thanks a lot! :D
Joder, es demasiado buena!
@@okokokok-x4m ¡Muchas gracias! :D
This guy is a true composer.
Thank you! (:
(not a guy btw)
Que c’est bien écrit et beau
@@PierreRevol Merci beaucoup ! :D
amazing fugue, how did you get your virtual piano showing which notes are playin , mines are not working
@@SSWCompositor Thanks a lot! (:
I use Musescore, which does it automatically.
Amazing
Thanks a lot! (=
is this inspired by Burgmuller "l'Orage"? sounds great
Thank you, I appreciate it! I am not familiar with the piece, but I see the similarity. (:
luscious!
Thank you! ^^
Fantastico brano, quasi clavicembalistico. Data la grande elaborazione ci sarebbe stata bene anche una incursione nel modo maggiore.
Grazie mille! :D
È un'ottima osservazione! Mi sento più a mio agio nelle tonalità minori. Ma sto cercando di scrivere di più in chiave maggiore.
Amazing Work! What software do you use to make this? And you record yourself playing for the upper keyboard layout?
Thank you so much! (=
This is Musescore 3. I don’t play the fugue myself, it’s all done by the software.
thanks for your work, it is inspiring. A non technical question: how it would be if played on organ? Or did you write it specifically for the piano? Could you upload a version with (simulated) organ?
Thank you, I appreciate it! (:
I am not trained in writing for organ. I wrote the fugue specifically for piano, the broken pedal points and Alberti bass-style writing is more idiomatic for harpsichord or piano afaik. I’m not sure if it would work on an organ (on a simulated organ no less).
There are tons of such figures in organ music when used as independent motives as here.
A question, are you self-taught? Or have you undertaken composition studies?
I have had a private music teacher for almost three years now who taught me most of what I know about music theory. Before that, I had piano lessons for a dozen or so years but learnt very little compared to the last three years.
Can I please write a variation of this for organ please?
@@Columbashaw Be my guest. (:
Although I’ve already tried and it didn’t work as well as I had expected. But if you come up with something decent, feel free to share it with me (my mail is in the channel description). (:
Wow, that’s nice! How is possible to write you? Please!
Thank you! (:
My email address is in the channel description. If you prefer Facebook Messenger, you can contact me here: facebook.com/wren.hiell
That was fuckin tight
@@buckethat310 Thank you! ^^
What about midi and vst plugin?
It's amazing
@@rubm3907 In some of my videos, I use Musescore 4, with special VSTs/soundfonts. But somehow, the dynamics are very weak, at least in the soundfonts I have tried out. So, if I want a fugue to have very expressive dynamics, I fall back on Musescore 3. Was that your question?
@averynhiell almost🙈
I meant that it would be cool to combine all this into a DAW, add effects to absolutely convey the beauty of the music
@averynhiell almost🙈
I meant that it would be cool to combine all this into a DAW, add effects to absolutely convey the beauty of the music
@@rubm3907 Ah, I see! ^^
There are a few MIDI-renditions of different pieces on my channel: ua-cam.com/play/PLCpNpMDytYKPukMxYiCRXsPDD4iApyAGA.html&si=pZQqBqdlempj_5f2
But I didn’t create them. Some of them were made by freelancers from Fiverr who I had actually paid to play them manually. When I uploaded the recordings, someone pointed out to me that they are most certainly mockups. The same person then created mockups of two or three other pieces for free, but it didn’t seem worth the effort at some point. And I’m not tech-savvy nor interested enough to attempt to learn it myself. 🙈
👏
@@storlok1922 Thank you! :D
Wow. Beautiful.
I’d love to play some of your fugues. May I ?
Thank you! (=
Of course, I would feel honoured. If you need a score for any of them, feel free to send me an e-mail, the address is in the channel description. Earlier pieces have a link to a MuseScore score.
I think Bach would live longer about 338 [O.S. 339] years old to compose a fugue.
@@JordanCooper-z7z I’m sorry, I’m not quite sure what you mean? (:
Whos playin it first
Like Beethoven you sure can write a weird Fugue subject!
Thank you, I think? xD
loving the subtly offensive pfp
Oh no, why is my profile picture offensive? It’s not supposed to be. xD
bro ??
The counterpoints were well enough, but there were an abuse of simple accompaiments that made some parts boring. Weirdly, it reminded me of some failures i had trying to write baroque compositions with counterpoints
I know what you mean by ‘simple accompaniment’, I was experimenting with something different this time. Whether it’s boring or not is of course subjective, but I see your point. (:
Bruh
@@wheelmanmitch xD
Можно ли с вами сотрудничать?
Извините, я не говорю по-русски, поэтому сотрудничество будет затруднительным. Что именно вы себе представляете? (:
@@averynhiell Я бы хотел возыметь ваши навыки в полифонии и подобно группе Rhapsody of fire. Сочинить средневековую мелодию распоряжаясь подголосками мелодии. Я уже сочинял в подобном стиле но я не имею к сожалению конкретного муз образования. Но могу показать что я сочинил, прислав вам фото а социальную сеть. Сейчас я начал работу над аранжировкой песни этой группы. Но совмещать учёбу и другие дела сложно. Но я буду стараться!
@@antonprokopenko6755 Извините, но в данный момент у меня нет возможности для такого проекта. Удачи вам! (:
@@averynhiell Ну хорошо, а расскажите как вы добились таких успехов что заканчивали вы щас учитесь, на кого на композитора или кого. Расскажите про себя?
@@antonprokopenko6755 У меня есть частный преподаватель, который учит меня контрапунктической композиции. Мы используем книги и другие материалы, но я не знаю никаких ресурсов на русском языке, извините. Если вы хотите изучать это в университете, вам стоит поискать "композиция" или "теория музыки". Надеюсь, это поможет! (: