Comparison of Tejas Mark 2 and Gripen E Fighter Aircraft
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 жов 2024
- The Tejas Mark 2 and the Gripen E are two advanced fighter aircraft designed to meet the evolving needs of modern air forces. The Tejas Mark 2, developed by India, represents a significant upgrade over its predecessor, featuring enhanced capabilities and performance. On the other hand, the Gripen, designed by Sweden's Saab, is known for its versatility and efficiency in various combat scenarios.
In this video we will compare these two aircraft, examining their specifications, features, and potential roles in the air combat landscape, helping us understand how they stack up against each other.
Length
The Tejas Mk2 measures 14.65 meters (48 feet) in length, while the Gripen E has a slightly greater length of 15,2 meters (51 feet).
Height
The Tejas Mk2 stands at a height of 4.87 meters (16 feet), which is taller compared to the gripen e height is 4.5 meters (14 feet)
Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW)
The maximum takeoff weight for the Tejas Mk2 is 17,500 kilograms (38,581 pounds), significantly higher than the JAS 39C/D's maximum takeoff weight of 16,500kg (36,376 lbs).
Range:
The Tejas Mk2 Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) has a range of 3,000 kilometers (1,900 miles), while the Saab Gripen E boasts a slightly higher maximum range of approximately 3,200 kilometers (about 1,988 miles).
Fuel Capacity
The Tejas Mk2 has a fuel capacity of 3,400 kilograms (7,500 pounds) internally. In comparison, the gripen e has an internal fuel capacity slightly lower 2,500 kg (about 5,511 lbs).
Powerplant and Thrust
The Tejas Mk2 is powered by a General Electric F414-INS6 afterburning turbofan engine, producing 57.8 kN (13,000 lbf) of thrust dry. In contrast, the gripen e utilizes a Volvo Aero RM12 afterburning turbofan engine, which provides 80 kN (18,000 lbf) of thrust.
Maximum Speed
The Tejas Mk2 can achieve a maximum speed of Mach 1.8, while the gripen E outpaces it with a maximum speed of Mach 2.
Follow us on social sites
Facebook: / jetlinemarve. .
Twitter: / jetline_marvel
Instagram: / jetlinemarv. .
UA-cam: www.youtube.co....
www.jetlinemarvel.net
Website : www.jetlinemarvel.net
Which is better? Airbus A320 neo or Boeing 737-8 max
www.youtube.co....
The Most Powerful Passports Of 2019
www.youtube.co....
Which is Bigger ? Antonov AN225 vs Airbus A380
www.youtube.co....
Luxurious Helicopter cabin tour : Part 5
www.youtube.co....
Top SIX Airlines in India - 2019 : by its Market share, Punctuality , Fleet size, Destinations.
Baltic Aviation Academy, TRTO, Type rating training, Full Flight Simulator, FFS, Airbus A320, A320, Cold and Dark, Cockpit, Airplane, Pilot, ATPL, Simulator
www.youtube.co....
The 10 Best Airports In The World In 2019: Skytrax Awards
www.youtube.co....
HAL Helicopter Ambulance displays at Aero-India 2019
www.youtube.co....
I doubt if this guy actually left all those basic mistakes in the video just to bait the comments, replies and engagement from the indians :( I mean its not like you can't google the engine thrust or hardpoint numbers before making such a stupid comparison video. Atleast look at the number of hardpoints in the images of the models you used for the video.
Both of the aircraft utilise the same engine (F414 and not Volvo for Gripen). Despite that you've made several inaccurate claims. This is basic stuff man.
The latest Gripen E is equipped with the F414 engine, while the earlier Volvo engine was derived from the F404. The engine size had to be adapted to fit the latest aircraft design.
Go,go,go 🇮🇳
F414 98kn not 57kn
It's afterburner!
It's dry thrust broo (57kn)
@@RahuluddinGandhy Narrator mentioned that both engines with afterburner. so there is a definite mistake in mentioning F-414 engine as 57 KN (could be dry thrust) with respect to Volvo RM 12 80 KN ( WITH AFTER BURNER). F-414 after burning thrust is 98 KN.
The latest version of the Gripen E, powered by the GE F414 engine, is derived from the F404-400 engine. This engine provides 25% more thrust, delivering up to 98 kN (22,000 pounds) with afterburner.
Tejas of Bharat 🇮🇳 is number one always, forever ❤
Has a prototype of the Tejas Mk2 even been built and test-flown yet?
Has the Tejas Mk1A even entered service yet?
🤔🤔🤔
First, you need to know the actual details of Tejas MK 2, your lot's of information are wrong.
Astra mk 1 is inducted while mk2 coming next yera and mk3 2026
I doubt that Israel's ELM 2052 radar will be used. GaN Aesa Uttam's testing, certification, and induction will occur concurrently with Tejas Mk-2 induction. India needs her own system.
Tejas 🇮🇳❤️
No point in comparing Tejas mk2 with gripen , till now there is no flight test of Tejas mk2 ,gripen is ready to combat
Comparing mk2 with Gripen but so far no mk1 is ready for service.
Mk2 is on the roll.
Gripen designed for europian condition Tejas designed to fly over sea and himalayan mountains
Gripen cannot carry the bigger brahmos missiles
Tejas so far has world best safety record
Gripin can use Telas/Mig21 for target practice.
Real plane versus imaginary one. 😂
Always Tejas +1
Just to get Indian views 😐,u have made video without any data
Lots of wrong fact you telling
Thik is an Indian channel for sure 😂
Hating , jealousy
Will not change anything keep in mind 😂
This is definitely the worst video I’ve ever seen about the Gripen E.
LOL WOW Broh! Yours Gripen E data is very very very worng..
For starters::
Engine = F-414(RM-16 upg) 98Kn not 80 is Cherlie version
fuel capacity = 4.000 liters and the range is 4.000 km not 3.200
ceiling =16.000m
It’s actually funny how little you know about the Gripen! Not only is your data completely wrong, but it looks like you got all tangled up with the data for the Charlie version.
And it seems like you don’t even know that the Echo doesn’t even have a defined flight envelope yet since the aircraft hasn’t reached IOC or FOC.
F-39 Gripen is better
F414 wet thrust is 98Kn..
thats afterburner
@@jetlinemarvelshorts3022 yep that's also called wet thrust...and wet thrust of GE F414 varient for Indian Tejas is about 98Kn and not 57kn..
Jetline Marvel is an Indian channel so obviously it does the usual Indian Full of Sh..
Here’s the corrected version:
- The Tejas Mk2 is powered by the F414 engine, offering 57.8 kN (13,000 lbf) of thrust dry and 97.9 kN (22,000 lbf) with afterburner. In comparison.
- The Gripen E’s engine provides 64 kN (14,400 lbf) of thrust dry and 98 kN (22,000 lbf) with afterburner.
Add-on
- The Tejas Mk2 is expected to feature 13 hardpoints with a payload capacity of around 6.5 tonnes, while
- The Gripen E has 10 hardpoints and can carry up to 7.2 tonnes.
Note: Tejas Mk2 specifications are based on claims by its developer and this video visualizes those projections. The aircraft is yet to demonstrate its full capabilities in real-world testing. On the other hand, the Saab Gripen E is a proven fighter jet that has already showcased its performance.
Misinformation