GERMAN New Infantry Fighting Vehicle SHOCKED The World!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 чер 2024
  • The Boxer is a battlefield chameleon, perfectly able to adapt to its environment. This armored transport vehicle is an example of how nations can pool resources to produce a vehicle that is highly useful to all armies that use it. The Boxer is an armored fighting vehicle used for a variety of tasks but its main purpose is for the transportation of personnel. It offers excellent protection and adaptability due to its secure but versatile modular setup. And now there’s a version with tracks. Let’s take a look at the original Boxer, the Boxer tracked, as well as a quick look at the new RCH 155 howitzer option.
    For copyright matters please contact us at: ytproductionvideo@gmail.com
    Video and image credit: Rheinmetall, KMW.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 89

  • @thegto8535
    @thegto8535 3 місяці тому +4

    Finally, almost 100 years later the Maus is here.

  • @apokaluptisch5678
    @apokaluptisch5678 10 місяців тому +16

    Germany, UK and France started the boxer as a cooperation project. UK didn't stop to bitched arround that they want a vehicle with the driver seat on the right side for left traffic or other wise they would leave the project. Then the brits got their right seated vehicle and left the project. At this point the design was so advanced that it didn't made any sens to change the seat. And this is the story why germany and France build a tank for the left side of the road and why nobody likes the UK... ^^

    • @thegto8535
      @thegto8535 3 місяці тому

      Given the german-usa relationship and Germany military policies it's already mind blowing that the french trusted the germans to begin with. Can't ask for too much in a single shot 🤣

  • @tonylynch7626
    @tonylynch7626 10 місяців тому +1

    Brilliant 🎉

  • @attilatasciko4817
    @attilatasciko4817 10 місяців тому

    3:36=That's the REAL "new" boxer .

  • @imnayanger4877
    @imnayanger4877 10 місяців тому +2

    This Armor vehicle model looks like the ww2 Pr Mouse that heavy type. This design looks the same 🤔☝🏻🔧

  • @ronielfabroa8242
    @ronielfabroa8242 10 місяців тому +2

    It's hard to tell who's better, at current war CV 90 is a setting duck using only RPG..

  • @attilatasciko4817
    @attilatasciko4817 10 місяців тому +2

    5:18= that's the one , could be usefull

  • @davidlecompte9467
    @davidlecompte9467 10 місяців тому +2

    Seriously, these title's are getting old. I'm part of the world and I'm not SHOCKED...

  • @attilatasciko4817
    @attilatasciko4817 10 місяців тому

    Thanks .

  • @SeanSoraghan
    @SeanSoraghan Місяць тому

    Conveyor belt... tracks

  • @gordonfrickers5592
    @gordonfrickers5592 10 місяців тому +2

    No anti drone solution?

    • @wudruffwildcard252
      @wudruffwildcard252 7 місяців тому +1

      As with every modern military vehicle, you can order it if you want it.

  • @Homoprimatesapiens
    @Homoprimatesapiens 10 місяців тому +5

    The Boxer track version needs the Israeli designed Trophy self defence system because its armoured protection is under question. But all other Boxer variants need this Trophy self protection system as well.

  • @stefans.3940
    @stefans.3940 10 місяців тому +2

    Clickbait Channel that SCHOCKED the World!

  • @markkierznowski6121
    @markkierznowski6121 10 місяців тому +2

    Shocked by its battle incompetence?

  • @Mark-qq7io
    @Mark-qq7io 9 місяців тому +1

    All this stuff about protecting from IEDs with all of America's technology why can't the invent something in the front of the vehicle that detects these mines just like they have mine sweepers but you couldn't find you couldn't fly a drone over a road with a downward seeking radar a ground-penetrating radar before they travel that road

  • @attilatasciko4817
    @attilatasciko4817 10 місяців тому +2

    Wrong design : rubber tires , etc...

  • @Mark-qq7io
    @Mark-qq7io 9 місяців тому

    What's the purpose of the silly thing around the barrel just to make it look more high-tech are you trying to waste of money

    • @g3roingrimm79
      @g3roingrimm79 6 місяців тому

      In Afganistan where some Problems i think with overheating barrels from the first batch of boxer so the new version changed some litle things including those barrel cover

  • @ethanmac639
    @ethanmac639 10 місяців тому +3

    The Russian VPK-7829 Bumerang IFV is way better than the German Boxer IFV or the American Amphibious Combat Vehicle

    • @Mygg_Jeager
      @Mygg_Jeager 10 місяців тому +9

      Ah yes, the newest generation of turret tossers.

    • @btc21million
      @btc21million 4 місяці тому

      Moron. They are under development and will never materialize after all those sanctions.

    • @rossg4788
      @rossg4788 4 місяці тому

      That vehicle is only in very limited production. They don't have funds for it and Boxer is a mature combat proven system

    • @ethanmac639
      @ethanmac639 4 місяці тому +1

      @@rossg4788 Boxer is garbage, the VPK-7829 Bumerang is superior!

    • @pandibbarman
      @pandibbarman 4 місяці тому +1

      ​@@ethanmac639I am pretty sure the boxer is not design to beat the bumerang, neither will this vehicle meet each other at the battle and the boxer is superior to Russian bumerang as always.

  • @haraldweiss8487
    @haraldweiss8487 10 місяців тому

    This IFV also fail like the APC Puma.

    • @thecurlew7403
      @thecurlew7403 6 місяців тому

      IFV well armoured are better than tanks they can take and hold positions with infantry and and troops can deal with armour if needed of course in front line they need the APS to deal with AT threats 😊😊

    • @pandibbarman
      @pandibbarman 4 місяці тому

      This is apc and the puma is an ifv ☠️🤣. Just shows how much knowledge you have 🤡

    • @thecurlew7403
      @thecurlew7403 4 місяці тому

      @@pandibbarman Tell me something I don't know 👉😜🤡

    • @pandibbarman
      @pandibbarman 4 місяці тому

      @@thecurlew7403 I am pretty sure I didn't reply to you but the person who wrote the comment in which we both replied too 😑

    • @thecurlew7403
      @thecurlew7403 4 місяці тому

      @pandibbarman No offence but the state of uk with migrants is more important than ifv and apcs its all done by design and uk forces is being destroyed and the army at 70 000 is not sufficient to defend it against China or Russia.