Should I Sell the RV-6A to Upgrade???

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 жов 2024
  • Here we go again. My beautiful little RV-6 may be put up for sale to fund a major upgrade to the fleet. Help me with the fleet optimization plan!
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 72

  • @v1rotait23
    @v1rotait23 3 місяці тому +2

    What a terrible problem to have... 🤣

  • @rayburn2007
    @rayburn2007 3 місяці тому +2

    A Kodiak 100 😅

  • @mikecoffee100
    @mikecoffee100 3 місяці тому

    Cirrus flying I pad ?? wellllll if you realy like it ok but keep it for awhile then

  • @jamesneumann5450
    @jamesneumann5450 3 місяці тому

    Go with the Siris and ENJOY

  • @stevenflattum156
    @stevenflattum156 3 місяці тому +3

    RV 10 is what you need.

    • @nossonyoffe3805
      @nossonyoffe3805 3 місяці тому

      I was thinking the same thing

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому +1

      I would prefer a 10 over the Cirrus, but I don’t have partners who agree with that plan. I may need you again for my RV-4 checkout!

  • @markg4459
    @markg4459 3 місяці тому

    You talk like you want the Cirrus (back). A partnership is an economical way to go, provided you have the right partner. You'll not regret the time with your daughter & possibly easier to move on from the partnership when you're ready...in two more years.
    I think your RV will fetch a good price given the quality & upgrades.
    Good luck! : )

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому

      The RV actually sold very quickly. I still want an RV in the fleet...probably a 4

  • @brandenraftery5074
    @brandenraftery5074 3 місяці тому

    Why not sell the 177 and have the RV & Cirrus? Then you'd have a nice family cruiser and a plane you could do gentleman's aerobatics and or more efficient solo cruising.

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому

      That would be great, but I do have a budget to consider. The plan is to buy a basic RV-4 for half the price of my Rv-6 for fun. I need more tailwheel time anyway.😀

  • @rfriesen1644
    @rfriesen1644 3 місяці тому

    Cirrus....

  • @patrickcoleman6088
    @patrickcoleman6088 3 місяці тому

    Turn the 177 into the Cirrus, keep the RV

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому

      Sure. Can I borrow $70,000?😀

    • @patrickcoleman6088
      @patrickcoleman6088 3 місяці тому

      Well, you asked the question and it’s evident you really like the RV and really like the Cirrus. Is there an attachment to the Cardinal? And let’s be honest…you’ve been spending a lot of money on hangers, 150’s, engines, and avionics…so it didn’t seem like the Cirrus was out of reach…

  • @larrytompkins4408
    @larrytompkins4408 3 місяці тому

    Get a Cessna TTX

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому

      Those are awesome. The Cirrus I have an opportunity to buy is a known quantity (no hidden issues with it). That is my best option right now.

  • @rexgialla1970
    @rexgialla1970 3 місяці тому +2

    Best Partnership is the one with an odd number less than 3.... My 2cents

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому

      Hard to go wrong with a plan like that.

  • @jacknevitt7384
    @jacknevitt7384 3 місяці тому

    The Cirrus seems more practical. The parachute adds a layer of options when you need them most plus it’s just a durn good airplane!

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому

      Yeah, I'm a fan of the Cirrus. I think it's a good way to go.

  • @thebluesbrother
    @thebluesbrother 3 місяці тому +2

    It's the Cirrus for me...

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому

      I like the way you think.

  • @4420dano
    @4420dano 3 місяці тому +1

    How bout instead of a (I'll guess) a partnership in a $400k cirrus, you get a nicely maintained Saratoga for yourself. You can pick those up all day for 200k or a bit less - and you'd have a great 145-160kt / 16 g/hr. xcty plane -- w/o a partner. Sure, it flies like a truck, but when you want to have fun, you'd still have the RV. I know all this stuff because I AM LIKE YOU AND ALWAYS LOOKING AT ANOTHER AIRPLANE! -- it's like a disease and you're right, it's always about 2 years and it doesn't matter how damn good my current plane already is ------ you're always looking at the next one! when you find a cure for THAT -- lemme know..........

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому

      The Saratoga is on the radar for sure. I rarely need a plane of that size though. I looked hard at the A36 as well.

  • @CompleteWalkaround
    @CompleteWalkaround 3 місяці тому

    Maybe trade the 177 for the Cirrus and keep the 6? Or trade the 6 for the Cirrus and get an RV3!

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому

      RV-3 or RV-4 for sure.

  • @BillUtah
    @BillUtah 3 місяці тому +1

    I think the parachute will also lower the in$urance..
    The only thing I'd be concerned is the partnership.
    Stay safe! 😊

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому

      The insurance is actually pretty high due to the hull value and the 5th seat.

  • @dennispease4218
    @dennispease4218 3 місяці тому +1

    Agreed the partnership is a worry, but if you are good with it, go with the Cirrus.

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому +2

      I've had good partners and bad. These guys are great.

  • @TherebyAir
    @TherebyAir 3 місяці тому

    We have an RV-8 and an SR20. Between the two planes, all of my missions are met, and all of my aviation itches are scratched. It would be difficult to decide on just one of them.

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому

      That sounds like a great mix of airplanes. I will most likely copy your plan.

  • @flyyourdream9716
    @flyyourdream9716 3 місяці тому +1

    Any thought on an upgrade to an RV10?

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому +1

      That is a great plane, but finding a good one that would satisfy my partners would be difficult.

  • @paulki8fr
    @paulki8fr 3 місяці тому

    Me personally I don't play well with others. The partnership would never work out for me. But partnerships has its positive and its negatives. The negatives was my issues.

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому +1

      I have had some bad partnerships. I am now VERY careful with whom I partner. I've got some good guys lined up!

  • @N98858
    @N98858 3 місяці тому

    Hey Him, Personally I'm NOT A Big Experimental Guy... The Cirrus is a "Much Better and Viable for ME Sir" and I believe that you too know that based on this video message! Thanks for asking for my 2 cents ';-)

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому +1

      It's tough to find a well built experimental. I'm definitely looking forward to owning something made in this century as well! Good to hear from you.

  • @aaronboulais4498
    @aaronboulais4498 3 місяці тому

    Do the Cirrus 👍🏻

  • @sip4751
    @sip4751 3 місяці тому

    Flying boat

  • @kirbyclone3293
    @kirbyclone3293 3 місяці тому

    Please put your panel in my RV-7 before you go…..😂

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому +1

      Going to a G1000 from 8 years ago is definitely a step BACKWARDS. I love the G3X touch.

  • @quickminutevideos3564
    @quickminutevideos3564 3 місяці тому

    Get the Float plane and, let's go on a fun fishing trip for a day :-)

  • @crufflerdoug
    @crufflerdoug 3 місяці тому

    Nice 6A! I own a slider 9A. Also had to look at a LOT of used RVs before I found mine. it's hard to find a good one. Keep the RV. :)

  • @RaceMentally
    @RaceMentally 3 місяці тому

    You’ll regret selling it. They ALL DO!!!
    Plus look at all the hangar room with the RV in there. You’ve got the plane that does it all. Only gripe is throwing stuff in baggage compartment. That’s it.

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому

      I will definitely buy another one. I’d just keep it VFR though. Love the RV lineup.

    • @RaceMentally
      @RaceMentally 3 місяці тому

      @@quinnjim what area are you in?

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому +1

      @@RaceMentally "What ARE ARE you in?" Did you mean what state? Illinois.

    • @RaceMentally
      @RaceMentally 3 місяці тому

      @@quinnjim area*

  • @coorsleftfield
    @coorsleftfield 3 місяці тому

    If an Rv4 with a tailwheel is "manning up" , going to a Cirrus, especially a 20, is going in the other direction from manning up. Get a tailwheel RV , and rent a 4 seater for the rare times it's needed.

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому

      I do too much flying to not have a 4 seater. The Cirrus is a great machine, but the folks who fly them definitely have a reputation! Tailwheel RV is definitely in the plan someday.

    • @coorsleftfield
      @coorsleftfield 3 місяці тому

      @@quinnjim I have a RV7 tailwheel and a Cessna 170. Love flying them both. Don't you have a 177 for a 4 seater?

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому

      @@coorsleftfield I do, but I'd like to have a modern 4 seater, then a RV-4 for the "toy" airplane. The 177 is wonderful, but 50 year old planes need a lot of work. The Cirrus is practically brand new.

  • @thesearcherman6652
    @thesearcherman6652 3 місяці тому

    Well, N11111 is for sale too. Just saying. A partnership also means you will be staying in Chi town for many more years???? If you subtracted the cost of ownership from that $100,000 the last Cirrus is worth today, what is the net gain? Did the last Cirrus need the 10 year parachute replaced? This one will need a new chute in 2 years. And, according to one YT channel, they are hard to come by these days. I forget the labor charge, wasn’t cheap. I think you need a PT 6 out front myself. Best Wishes!

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому

      The Cirrus parachute is actually due every 10 years, so this one needs one in 2. The parts supply problem has been largely fixed. My shop said 5-8 weeks lead time is all they need. You are selling the Aerostar? That is another great option!

    • @thesearcherman6652
      @thesearcherman6652 3 місяці тому

      @@quinnjim-Not my Aerostar, it’s well know Aerostar YT provider Eric Reese, my mistake on the Cirrus parachute years. You might like YT provider JR Aviation’s post awhile back on his Cirrus SR 20 chute. UA-cam will not let me post the links. Thanks for the reply and best wishes to you and your family!

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому

      @@thesearcherman6652 I watched that video. I have a buddy who waited a year for his chute too. We called our service center and they said they have gotten caught up with the parts problem Cirrus was having. We are still going to order ours 6-8 months early!

    • @thesearcherman6652
      @thesearcherman6652 3 місяці тому

      @@quinnjim- I shouldn’t have said anything, You got it all figured out. But, maybe checkout the 2025 Corvette C8 ZR1 if you get bored. 👍

  • @lutherwasoniii6627
    @lutherwasoniii6627 3 місяці тому

    I agree with the RV10! best of both worlds.

  • @skycop56
    @skycop56 3 місяці тому

    I own an RV6A. I love it. But most of my flying is done VFR and solo. Don’t fly at night. If money was no issue I’d buy the SR22. In a partnership you will cut costs by 50% and still get all the benefits. The RV should fetch $125k+ in todays market. Go for it.

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому +1

      You know the market! I think the Cirrus and a RV-4 would be perfect.

  • @rosemaryfulgenzi2059
    @rosemaryfulgenzi2059 3 місяці тому

    Yes....a parachute says your Mom!

  • @Ralphymay5
    @Ralphymay5 3 місяці тому

    Have you considered Lancair 4s? For the same money you could get a pressurized turbine one.

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому

      I think the insurance and fuel bill would be a little out of my budget. Great plan, though.

  • @aeromatt
    @aeromatt 3 місяці тому

    youll need 5 or 6 partners to get to the same cost as the RV lol with that cirrus but definitely much more capable than the -6 for some missions.

    • @quinnjim
      @quinnjim  3 місяці тому +1

      Actually not true. The RV is very close to 1/3 of the Cirrus. I know most RV's sell for $80-$100K, but those don't have the build quality and $50,000 panel mine does.

    • @aeromatt
      @aeromatt 3 місяці тому

      fair point I was generalizing, and I thought that was a SR-22 not an SR-20

  • @irishcurse65
    @irishcurse65 3 місяці тому

    Go for the Cirrus