Please show the peer reviewed blinded data. So you're saying that you had enough "data" that the first PICL procedure with decreased lateral overhand on the dynamic open mouth odontoid xray that for all patients going forward you turned a blind eye to see if your novel procedure was still working? What is the clinical meaningful number for decreased overhang ("substantial improvement in CCI")? From 5mm to 3mm etc, has this been established? Who has defined this number and how was that done? Whats the number that correlates with clinical improvement (VAS/NDI?). It appears you are making up your own information which ultimately leads to you performing more procedures because the first treatment did not work. And who's paying for this? Do you take insurance?
I think you gotta get the structure as stable as possible before the body can actually heal and the nerves calm down. It’s kinda like when we fix a building in my construction job. We have to drill piles thru the existing foundation to stop it from sinking. If there aren’t enough piles drilled to make the foundation level, things like the windows and doors won’t stop moving or being unable to fit in the lopsided building. So you keep drilling until everything is level. Then you see what else needs to be fixed like the facade and the interior walls that had extra stress on them due to the settling of the foundation and the excess movement.
This Analogy is used by every doctor ever, that is trying to sell their produce. This makes sense, until you remember that unlike buildings, cars or robots, we regenerate on our own…. We don’t always need outside help
If you don’t improve off of the first at all symptomatically, don’t bother with more. I made this mistake and wasted a ton of money. I even got repeat dmx scans that showed zero improvement, and yet I was wooed into the idea of “more more more.” The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.
@@DynamicUnreal I think it’s just another option to try. But the clinic reflexively markets it as a cure, which there is zero scientific evidence of. And the price is insane for basically a glorified clinical trial.
Seen a video where a guy was treated successfully by your clinic but his nuero symtoms stayed because of trigger points still there in the musculiture, he then had dry needling to help this and they went away.
![[UA] NAVI проти G2 Esports | Blast Premier Fall Final](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QWlIm4FGESQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Why do you not share the process of collecting bone marrow and concentrating it and how to do the PICL procedure so other docs can help people?
Please show the peer reviewed blinded data. So you're saying that you had enough "data" that the first PICL procedure with decreased lateral overhand on the dynamic open mouth odontoid xray that for all patients going forward you turned a blind eye to see if your novel procedure was still working? What is the clinical meaningful number for decreased overhang ("substantial improvement in CCI")? From 5mm to 3mm etc, has this been established? Who has defined this number and how was that done? Whats the number that correlates with clinical improvement (VAS/NDI?). It appears you are making up your own information which ultimately leads to you performing more procedures because the first treatment did not work. And who's paying for this? Do you take insurance?
Has to consider those with wrong diagnostic, those who were recuperated but still has symptoms
I think you gotta get the structure as stable as possible before the body can actually heal and the nerves calm down. It’s kinda like when we fix a building in my construction job. We have to drill piles thru the existing foundation to stop it from sinking. If there aren’t enough piles drilled to make the foundation level, things like the windows and doors won’t stop moving or being unable to fit in the lopsided building. So you keep drilling until everything is level. Then you see what else needs to be fixed like the facade and the interior walls that had extra stress on them due to the settling of the foundation and the excess movement.
This Analogy is used by every doctor ever, that is trying to sell their produce. This makes sense, until you remember that unlike buildings, cars or robots, we regenerate on our own…. We don’t always need outside help
Is there an age related component to the possible improvement?
If you don’t improve off of the first at all symptomatically, don’t bother with more. I made this mistake and wasted a ton of money. I even got repeat dmx scans that showed zero improvement, and yet I was wooed into the idea of “more more more.”
The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.
Is there improvement for some and no improvement for others?
@@DynamicUnreal nothing is guaranteed in medicine. Don’t believe the hype these clowns sell.
@@DynamicUnreal nothing is guaranteed in medicine.
@@BradLessy That's true, but basically what I'm asking is... is it a scam or is it that it just didn't work for you specifically?
@@DynamicUnreal I think it’s just another option to try. But the clinic reflexively markets it as a cure, which there is zero scientific evidence of. And the price is insane for basically a glorified clinical trial.
Seen a video where a guy was treated successfully by your clinic but his nuero symtoms stayed because of trigger points still there in the musculiture, he then had dry needling to help this and they went away.
Trigger point Dry needling made me so much worst