The Aesthetiques In His Approach To The Setting Of Her Dress; "Possibly After The Speck of Her Garment; Of garments; Is As Dazzling As His "Take of His Charge Of The Profession In Its Recognition; of His and Her; Both as Statuesque!!!
Not sure what the fuss is here… Woodcock didn’t want to go. Didn’t want to make the dress. But royalty comes knocking and you answer. He then sees what he and all of us know, how much of a disastrous train wreck this women is, drunk in his WORK. That’s his name, his honor his HOUSE (of Woodcock) to represent That the rich drunk woman just flicks off her shoulder like a piece of lint. She doesn’t deserve the dress. She doesn’t deserve anything, yet she has it all And that is what hit him. Love Alma for riding with him. Believing in him and ultimately trusting that she could encourage him to stand up and stick up for what’s yours. Your Name! This is a great scene 🎬
This is darker than I remembered when seeing the film years ago. Alma urging Reynolds to be so cruel to an obviously troubled, lost person isn't exactly an easy triumph to celebrate, is it? A less complicated version would have had the heiress saying something anti-Semitic or her money revealed to be part of something awful, then we'd all cheer for Alma "rescuing" the dress. But this is darker and sadder, that Alma wins greater intimacy with Reynolds by harshly condemning a damaged person.
Alma shows that she's not only married to Reynolds Woodcock-she's married to *THE HOUSE OF WOODCOCK* as well or perhaps to an even greater degree. She's willing to be very nasty in order to protect THOW and that-is the something in common that they previously lacked.
On a sidenote about antisemitism the real life playboy that the husband is based on sold visas to Jews at the start of The Holocaust. And saved perhaps 1-2k people. A life saved is a life saved, right? Well....what separates a righteous gentile from a calloused profiteer that was cunning enough to know that the Nazis were fated to lose? Some of the same critiques of wily foresight have been leveled at Oskar Schindler. But, Oskar Schindler went broke saving Jews. The playboy got very very rich.
@@jon8004 Like I mentioned earlier. Reynolds KNOWS she's a drunk-hes been dressing her for years. She's based on a real life heiress. I agree her sad behavior makes the dress sad. But, getting a dress back after she's asleep serves no purpose but to be outrageous and a bully. Barbera is worth 100s of millions she's never going to wear that dress again anyway.
It’s actually Alma who makes the scene, really. It was her idea to collect the dress, she physically took it off of the heiress, and she heatedly ended their business relationship. For the people saying that Alma was wrong to take the dress, you probably haven’t had the honor of wearing a gown custom-made by a world-famous designer. Yes, you wear it, but it’s a work of art that you care for. It’s also a collaboration with the artist that requires trust on both ends. Imagine someone at the Met Gala wiping their dirty hands on a De La Renta gown!
When someone buys something it becomes the property of the purchaser. The seller loses their rights to it, and if the purchaser chooses to wipe their ass with it, it's their right.
we would play dress up in the television room. i was a roman soldier while vicky maid. it was harmonious in the sense that there was a light musical aeration in the finest motes of dust that flittered through decanted dappled afternoon sunsheeeeeine. ❤steven saw it daniel. he saw and he heard the trespass. therein where we find affinities in finitu
I don’t care what shape Barbra Rose was in, you do not strip an incapacitated woman from her clothing that she paid for without her consent. This entire scene was a huge turn-off. Also, it was Alma’s sick way of showing her twisted loyalty to Reynolds, and we found out what a very strange relationship those two had going. Very sick people. Literally and figuratively.
Jesus Christ...do you often get this worked up over fictional stories? Forget this rude and mildly morally inconvenient scene, I don't think you would survive watching horror and crime movies. Do you know they actually show ppl killing in crime movies? I beg you, for the sake of your precious innocence and sanity, stay away from those movies.
Technically, I suppose it's "wrong" to take the dress back, but Reynolds is also operating on a higher level. He's basically saying, "You purchased this dress under false pretenses." He demands a standard of behavior from his customers. How they behave reflects on his work. She's an insecure, mentally ill alcoholic who's marrying a war profiteer. So he decides to take the dress back - and refund her money, I assume - because she's incapable of respectfully wearing the brand. He demands confident, respectable customers.
Well, if it's the film that you're describing, it's entirely up to you whether you choose to watch it or not. If you don't wish to watch that film as apparently it's so disagreeable to you in every respect, why don't you just fuck off to back where you came from?
I don't care what anyone says, this is my favorite scene in the film!! I'll watch it over and over again and never get tired of it's genius
You don't care what anyone says. A true rebel we have here
Vicky Krieps keeps delivering flawless performance systematically. Non stopping fine art.
Daniel Day Lewis ALWAYS "makes" a scene! What a legend!
This movie is a disappointment ....
@@shirleycameron7718 maybe you have no taste.
@@shirleycameron7718 How so?
The woman who played Barbara Rose did a fantastic job. All the supporting characters were quite good in this movie.
That is Harriet Samson Harris, possibly best known as the ruthless agent "Bebe Glazer" in "Frasier".
I’m so in love with this movie.
I love this movie so much. And I adore the music.
Plucking?
I simply love this movie
Daniel Day-Lewis is so goddamn good in this
"She can no longer behave like this in a dress from the House of Woodcock"
"I'm trying to make you a beautiful *dress*."
Thr pragmatism
When I first saw this in the theater I couldn't help lol when Barbara Rose did a face plant.
It was only a matter of time lol
Daniel Day Lewis is probably the the greatest actor of our time
The Aesthetiques In His Approach To The Setting Of Her Dress; "Possibly After The Speck of Her Garment; Of garments; Is As Dazzling As His "Take of His Charge Of The Profession In Its Recognition; of His and Her; Both as Statuesque!!!
I wanna be kissed by Daniel Day-Lewis that way.😍😍😍 DDL is so handsome and awesome!
What a powerful scene. Wow! Two great actors and dynamite, kaboom!
Magnifico Daniel, come sempre, bravissimi anche gli altri e Anderson!! Grande film!!
Not sure what the fuss is here…
Woodcock didn’t want to go. Didn’t want to make the dress. But royalty comes knocking and you answer.
He then sees what he and all of us know, how much of a disastrous train wreck this women is, drunk in his WORK. That’s his name, his honor his HOUSE (of Woodcock) to represent
That the rich drunk woman just flicks off her shoulder like a piece of lint. She doesn’t deserve the dress. She doesn’t deserve anything, yet she has it all
And that is what hit him. Love Alma for riding with him. Believing in him and ultimately trusting that she could encourage him to stand up and stick up for what’s yours. Your Name!
This is a great scene 🎬
holy s***, it's bebe glazer from frasier
This is darker than I remembered when seeing the film years ago. Alma urging Reynolds to be so cruel to an obviously troubled, lost person isn't exactly an easy triumph to celebrate, is it? A less complicated version would have had the heiress saying something anti-Semitic or her money revealed to be part of something awful, then we'd all cheer for Alma "rescuing" the dress. But this is darker and sadder, that Alma wins greater intimacy with Reynolds by harshly condemning a damaged person.
Barbara Rose is an irredeemable, sloppy alcoholic. I don't blame Alma for pulling that dress off her unconscious body.
It was a surprise that she was a drunk?
Alma shows that she's not only married to Reynolds Woodcock-she's married to *THE HOUSE OF WOODCOCK* as well or perhaps to an even greater degree.
She's willing to be very nasty in order to protect THOW and that-is the something in common that they previously lacked.
On a sidenote about antisemitism the real life playboy that the husband is based on sold visas to Jews at the start of The Holocaust.
And saved perhaps 1-2k people.
A life saved is a life saved, right?
Well....what separates a righteous gentile from a calloused profiteer that was cunning enough to know that the Nazis were fated to lose? Some of the same critiques of wily foresight have been leveled at Oskar Schindler.
But, Oskar Schindler went broke saving Jews.
The playboy got very very rich.
@@jon8004 Like I mentioned earlier.
Reynolds KNOWS she's a drunk-hes been dressing her for years.
She's based on a real life heiress.
I agree her sad behavior makes the dress sad.
But, getting a dress back after she's asleep serves no purpose but to be outrageous and a bully.
Barbera is worth 100s of millions she's never going to wear that dress again anyway.
It’s actually Alma who makes the scene, really. It was her idea to collect the dress, she physically took it off of the heiress, and she heatedly ended their business relationship.
For the people saying that Alma was wrong to take the dress, you probably haven’t had the honor of wearing a gown custom-made by a world-famous designer. Yes, you wear it, but it’s a work of art that you care for. It’s also a collaboration with the artist that requires trust on both ends. Imagine someone at the Met Gala wiping their dirty hands on a De La Renta gown!
Maybe try imagining being kind instead. You’re unhinged.
This is a brilliantly underrated movie
Another master of his art
The superb Harriet Sansom Harris
Daniel Day Lewis needs to pull a Tom Brady.
Could you please elaborate? I don't know what this means.
Comeback from retirement
@@gcoleman18 well he is back
This really was Cyril’s movie
Harriet Sansom Harris is amazing in "Jules" (2023). beautiful.
It feels like there's a Barbara Hutton inspiration here
Marrying a Rubirosa type
But then again if that scene had a real reference who would be the real tailor?
Please come out of retirement!
2:54
That look tells you all you need to know about Alma. Clunky exposition and backstory whittled down into a single poetic glare.
Perhaps He Sees Himself In Her.
Perfect portrait of a rich alcoholic.
She Is Possibly In Mourning: "Where He Is Aware; As Her Designer of Choice!!
When someone buys something it becomes the property of the purchaser. The seller loses their rights to it, and if the purchaser chooses to wipe their ass with it, it's their right.
In This Movie Daniel Day Lewis Sounds Like Yukon Cornelius!
His name is Woodcock.
So sad to hear he has retired from acting
"Alma..."
as a boy i used to so little secret messages in the theremins merlin had me distributing along the zauberflite to dukakis.
to hell with his dress
Bee Bee!
we would play dress up in the television room. i was a roman soldier while vicky maid. it was harmonious in the sense that there was a light musical aeration in the finest motes of dust that flittered through decanted dappled afternoon sunsheeeeeine. ❤steven saw it daniel. he saw and he heard the trespass. therein where we find affinities in finitu
She's a very unhappy alcoholic.
true story shatterrd glass
memorable they need a predecessor to takeover hostile takeover just not the iceman or scimitar
You can behave however badly in public that you want but not in my dress! And sleeping in it?!....that's really gone too far. I love it.
I thought he retired?
@666waughtron666. This was his last film.
👑✨
I don’t care what shape Barbra Rose was in, you do not strip an incapacitated woman from her clothing that she paid for without her consent. This entire scene was a huge turn-off. Also, it was Alma’s sick way of showing her twisted loyalty to Reynolds, and we found out what a very strange relationship those two had going. Very sick people. Literally and figuratively.
You’re insane it was amazing
LOL, 😂🤦🏼♀️ don’t watch the movie please, this sophisticated story line isn’t for you
😂🎉😅
Jesus Christ...do you often get this worked up over fictional stories? Forget this rude and mildly morally inconvenient scene, I don't think you would survive watching horror and crime movies. Do you know they actually show ppl killing in crime movies?
I beg you, for the sake of your precious innocence and sanity, stay away from those movies.
Technically, I suppose it's "wrong" to take the dress back, but Reynolds is also operating on a higher level. He's basically saying, "You purchased this dress under false pretenses." He demands a standard of behavior from his customers. How they behave reflects on his work. She's an insecure, mentally ill alcoholic who's marrying a war profiteer. So he decides to take the dress back - and refund her money, I assume - because she's incapable of respectfully wearing the brand. He demands confident, respectable customers.
wow. he should have retired before he made this snoozefest.
A petualant spoiled man-child and his wealthy worthless drunk client. This was aweful to watch.
I'm sorry but this movie was like loitering in nice clothes. Slow dynamics with the wife. Pointless.
Probably the worst of his movies so many to pick from dreadful one and all
Well, if it's the film that you're describing, it's entirely up to you whether you choose to watch it or not. If you don't wish to watch that film as apparently it's so disagreeable to you in every respect, why don't you just fuck off to back where you came from?
Why click on this video and feel the need to comment then? You'll just spend more time watching something you don't appreciate
He was only joking. Daniel killed the performance