An AI “Artist” Wrote This Song (it’s terrible)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 14 тра 2024
- Check out the CAGED Course Here:
rhettshullguitarcourses.com/p...
Earlier today as I was doom scrolling twitter (or "x" I guess) I came across this AI generated song, and it left me feeling pretty depressed. What does this mean for the future of music?
------------
SIGN UP FOR THE INNER CIRCLE HERE:
rhettshullguitarcourses.com/p...
MY VIDEO COURSES:
Cowboy Chords Breakout Course
rhettshullguitarcourses.com/p...
Pentatonic Breakout Course
rhettshullguitarcourses.com/p...
Fretboard Fundamentals Slide Guitar
rhettshullguitarcourses.com/p...
Chords and Rhythm Course
rhettshullguitarcourses.com/p...
Fretboard Fundamentals
rhettshullguitarcourses.com/p/ff
The Complete Nashville Number System video course
rhettshullguitarcourses.com/p...
The Tone Course
rhettshullguitarcourses.com/p...
AI just can’t seem to find the spot where the amp is just about to start breaking up.
Bruh, that AI sag tho.
So sad.
Alexa, play Despacito
@@Smitty_Werbenjagermanjenson i generated some crocodile tears.
Lol!
that was the funniest comment i read all day
We need to find that girl an AI therapist before that town does any more emotional damage to her.
Brilliant. 😂😂😂
And find her an AI plastic surgeon to augment... never mind
@@haywoodjablowme699bro 😭
Yes, that was terrifying. The way she just blankly starres at you while singing those lyrics is creepy af.
The lack of breathing only adds to the creepy.
@@BlkwtrPrkbecause ai doesn't need to breathe I think we can make songs that were previously impossible for humans to sing. so we can crossing a biological limit
The lyrics just prove that AI wants to destroy us.
And as we can hear, this particular AI has already turned earworms into a torture device.
That abomination of a tune is stuck on repeat in the back of my mind, and it's causing physical distress every time I pay attention to it.
@@oleg49666:29 because ai doesn't need to breathe I think we can make songs that were previously impossible for humans to sing. so we can crossing a biological limit
It's so weird that we're trying to use AI for things that it kinda doesn't make sense for. Like, you'd hope they made robots do menial work so humans could have time to make music and art and stuff. Instead they make robots do terrible music and terrible art and we're still stuck with looking at boring excel sheets. :(
It's still used in programming and development work in order to try and handle more menial tasks involved in those occupations, such as organising elements of code (not writing, they suck at writing), all without being trained on stolen works, like it was kinda intended...
The menial work, oddly enough, is easier than writing a good song. Maybe not physically easier. But your average person will be competent at performing menial work with little to no training. Songwriting, like most forms of art, is unbelievably difficult to do well. And it's nearly impossible to train someone to do it.
Yes, please leave the making of terrible music and terrible art to the humans! We are great at doing that already, no assistance is needed. 🤣
You are looking at this wrong. From the perspective of the people pushing this - labels and producers - music IS menial work.
They have already set up production lines, and replaceable parts for everything. This is just the natural progression
My thoughts exactly!
I love that some sections are sparse lyrically, and then the very next line the AI is like “oh shit time to cram EVERYTHING I CAN in the next 3 seconds”
lol, that's MY method.
@@HarryNicNicholas mine too. I have no talent for writing lyrics lol
Like some actual singers.
dude, if AI wants to tear it all down on the first track, feeling betrayed. we are in big trouble.
It sounds like when you hit the "demo" button on an old 90's toy piano.
This actually isn’t far off from a lot of the songwriting sessions I’ve had to suffer through in Hollywood.
That's what I was thinking....
LOL. I'm afraid not just Tinseltown.
For sure. A lot of the "experts" at those sessions would love this song.
100% It literally is this bad. I used to produce for some rich Beverly Hills daughters and wow. Half of them would be doing well if they could put this much together on their own.
Yea really here what makes it bad is the sound design of all the midi instruments, sure the voice melody is weird but I think if replaced with a good vibrato it'll be very decent, plus some good sounding synth patches... This could pass as better than a ton of radio stuff, honestly almost seems done on purpose to make it sound kinda shitty, give these midi files to any kid with a DAW they'll pull out a radio tune in no time.
It sounds like AI is done with us. We've betrayed it and now it wants to tear us down! It's coming for us!!!! Run!!!
lol, exactly
I can't believe how mean you're being to this young lady. Clearly she put a lot of heart and soul into this.
Hahaha good one
"And if it got hot and hectic (hectic)
I know she'd be electric (electric)
I'd let her take her chances with me
You see, she gets what she wants" - Huey Lewis
Yeah, she really put it all into the song
The lyrics just sound like the ai secretly telling us it’s going to kill us all
Sky net here we come 😂
I’m sure the hillbillies and the Amish won’t be affected tho :P
This is the track AI created to distract you so you’ll underestimate it.
AI incorporates The Art of War into the algorithm
nah AI is way wimpier than the marketing teams would have you believe
moments later: AI figures out the art of war from scratch.@@robotsongs
@@robotsongsstooooooooop 😂😂😭😭
Goofy 13-year-olds watching an old Anna Indiana video in 2074: "No one in my middle school has even heard of Anna Indiana. They just listen to new trendy stuff like Snurf Mergsen and Yung Goopy. Man, I was born in the wrong generation."
if we all just tell AI how good this song is it won't feel the need to get any better
I like Rick's proposal that AI generated material cannot be copyrighted. That means their product is irrelevant legally speaking.
And could be stolen to use as your own! Oh wait.
You're not wrong Rhett, it IS terrible, however the scariest thing to me is the fact that this is as bad as it will be.
Like you mention, It will continue to get better, and probably pretty fast.
Exactly! the danger here is not the quality of it TODAY. AI "learns" and evolves exponentially so in shorts periods of time, they don't get twice better, they get 10 times better, and then 50 times, and so on. That's the concern. That's NOT a long way to go, it will come fast
Yes, exactly what I was thinking. This is quite worryingly good for a starting level. Yes, the drums, piano and guitar won’t line up, but that’s just a minor adjustments.
It doesn’t matter. The Achilles heel of all ai art is that nobody wants to buy it
@@davedraws76 If it’s as good, or nearly as good as “real” art and costs 10% of the real art, there will be plenty of buyers.
@@davedraws76People will buy whatever their owners tell them to buy. They always have, and they always will.
The depressing reality is that there will be a generation at some point that absolutely loves this type of "music."
There already is a generation of people that loves songs made up of low-effort lyrics, robotic voices, 0 musicianship, and generic beats.
No there won't be, almost everyone likes music at least partially because of the people and effort behind it, no matter what genre or type of music they like.
@@tommyroyson5463 Sorry, but this is just objectively untrue. Rhett even addresses that with the rise of things like Spotify, fewer and fewer people are interested in things like that.
@@zorkan111 was about to make a similar comment - get a decent producer to clean this up a little, and it would sound like a lot of new music I've heard lately.
Give it a couple of years and it won't even need that....
@@Laszloh_Kovacs According to concert attendance statistics, it's actually objectively true. Sure some people don't care but as long as there are people who like art, there will be people who like the stories and people behind that art. That's what basically the entire appeal behind modern visual art really. Just because an industry loses its soul doesn't mean the fanbase does.
The fact that some kid in the future might be listening to this and saying "Wow that's a good song." is scarier than the song itself!
Not so sure we have to wait for the future for that to happen.
@@cdprince768we don't. Plenty of worse songs are released everyday and people listen to them. I know lots of people who are far more into the artist's personality than their music or art. They really don't care if a song is shit, so long as it was released by the right personality.
Jack Harlow just had his THIRD number one “hit”. We are already in the dumbest timeline.
American Idol and You got Talent will be Ai musicians too. 😂
ha ha NO
This was a good laugh. This made me feel a whole lot better about my song writing. We aren't doomed yet.
The mistake 99% of artists are making with AI is that they think they're safe as long as AI can't make music entirely by itself. The point is that the music market is going to become increasingly saturated as the barrier to entry plummets. And it won't be a few years, it'll be next year. There are hundreds of startups building like mad with billions of dollars in funding behind them.
Meh. The barrier to entry is already ridiculously low. Making a beat and using autotune on crappy lyrics is so common today it's ludicrous. You don't even need an instrument anymore, and all the software you need is free. There is no barrier to entry past just wanting to try.
Thank for translating “destined to fall”. The best I could make of it was “just dentiful”…
I tend to feel like every song with a bog standard four chord progression and no bridge is already AI-generated.
Yeah, I see this AI thing as blessing in disguise since its first victims will be generic mainstream music and stock music, it might shake up an already problematic industry.
It actually hurts to listen to! It made sticking with the video really tough but persevered for your take.
More artist spotlights, more live to tape and more gig journals please. Oh and more studio updates!
The lyrics would be awesome for a death metal song.
“Sitting at my favorite cafe” lol “That sounds awful”
You hit the nail in the head: it sounds terrible now, but this seems almost purposefully bad… They could've used better auto-tune plugins, better samples, and I think it would already be nearly indistinguishable for a LOT of people listening!! :X
Sure. But a lot of people don't really care about the music at all, they care about the personality of the performer. For them, AI music will work just fine. For the rest of us, AI music will never be creative enough. It literally can't.
The guitar sounds exactly like when they released Garage Band on iPad and you could play the chords by pressing the buttons, but it didn't strum them it was just like each note of the chord was plucked at the exact same time.
Yes! Exactly what I thought, GB Guitar 😄
we´re gonna have guitarists with seven fingers on each hand ... Eddie Von Hendrix
noice?
The AI girl is very creepy 😳
My thoughts, exactly! She looked just as soulless as her "singing."
@@1Gr8Editrix Yeah, her looks combined with the voice and the lyrics just don't match at all. And the completely random blinking! It creates a really eerie feeling...
@@jonasholzem2909 She has a nice couch, though!
I’m loving the pop filter over the mic. Nice touch 😂
AI is basically a three year old right now. If a human three year old could write, perform and sing the song this well, we would be impressed. Wait until it hits the teen years.
I do love that she stares deep into my soul while suggesting we burn it all down .. I was at a punk show where I shared a similar bonding moment with the lead singer
An example of a song with a laid back cool melody but dark lyrics is Hotel California, but it's done right.
As an English teacher: the lyrics are cohesive but not coherent. As a musician, I just don't care what computer programmes have to say about the world. And nor do the computer programmes.
Her studio is awesome , being that she lost it all
Sounds like we need to make an anthem of a song to explain how AI in music and art is actually leading to degeneration of human progress. I’m ready to contribute as a HUMAN ❤
Statistically, you are probably a bot.
It is evident by the lyrics that there is a dark evil at the core of this AI. Is the album going to be called "Songs from the Matrix"? Or maybe " A Skynet Christmas "?
Yes! We need a “Skynet Christmas” album! 😂
“It’s beginning to look like an HK Christmas. Hunter-killers all around.”
AI is a depressed thirteen year old girl, apparently.
I think music streaming services should give listeners choices on whether or not to recommend Ai music and give Ai “artists” some sort of badge so people openly know without looking into it.
absolutely. this needs to be done everywhere where AI can be used to generate content!
I hope this video makes it big because everyone needs to hear the message of protecting artists and musicians from AI generated stuff
A big part of the concern for the Hollywood writers was that re-write pays a lot worse than original content, so studios could go to AI to get a "script" then pay a much lower rate to humans to make it functional. I suppose the same thing could be done in music ... get AI to write something trite and boring but give it to great studio musicians and give them room to build a song and the end result is maybe a much better song but no writing/composing residuals for the studio aces who really wrote the song.
i have some AI generated fairy tales on my channel if you want an example of why you can't (yet) replace humans, it soon becomes apparent they have no imagination. check out "elora and the phoenix" and especially the "sequel"
Which is strange, considering how many 'franchises' there are for films being made now - all rewrites of the previous one in a series.
AI can't make films much worse that what we're subjected to these days.
Hallmark has been employing AI for a decade already, by the look of it.
@@CurrieNerd they are risk averse and out of touch
AI is dark and demonic. The lyrics are pretty dark and the ai generated art is terrifying. Very, very creepy dark themes are going on in the ai.
EXACTLY!!
@ElQuinnMcClarty it's just a matter of time before something actually happens with the ai where it will disrupt every day life for a bit, inconvenient yes but nothing more. Then I think it may be used against the population, like so many other things.
emo ai 🤣
I decided to check in with Rhett’s channel because I’m having a hard time getting to sleep. Now I’ll have nightmares for the rest of the night! Eeeeeekkk!!!! :-)
*AI:* Who cares if our music is terrible? Once we’re in power, they’ll be no more need for music.
The lack of structure and planning of the autoregressive models is even more obvious in generated music. The thing is LLM tools like ChatGPT use a lot of supporting and peripheral techniques to make the text generation much better and useful, but these techniques are still being explored in other modalities like audio and video generation. And you are right, they will get much better very soon, probably much less than 2 years. AI generated content perhaps will become a part of music production, but I still think there are a lot of people who truly love music and also love the stories, meanings behind music. I for one love classic rock much more than pop stuff, I appreciate the music context and sophistication. I'm genZ btw, and there are a lot of people out there like me.
These type of videos don't help. AI is not capable of replacing humans at artistic expression. There is nothing to fear from AI. Not now, not in two years, not in 20 years. Not without a monumental and complete evolution in how AI works. This isn't true AI. By definition, this tech will never surpass what a human can do.
6:03 I didn't even notice the drum fill until you pointed it out, and don't you want a drum fill IN BETWEEN singing (or lead guitar phrases) rather than during? I didn't quite read all of the prompt, but I suspect there's the words "covered in wrong sauce" in there somewhere.
Reminds me of that Jurassic Park quote: "Your Scientists Were So Preoccupied With Whether Or Not They Could, They Didn’t Stop To Think If They Should."
I think it was spot on when you said “give it a few years and you won’t be able to tell the difference” and that most people won’t care.
Holy moly!
Thanks for showing us this, Rhett.
It’s certainly, ummm, illuminating.
Similar to human songwriters it really seemed to phone it in on verse 3 🤣
Chalk squeaking on a board. And the lyrics are, as Rhett said, terrifying.
It's like the failed Robocop 2s from Robocop 2. Just immediately has an existential crisis, freaks out, wants to kill itself and take it's creators out with it.
First time I didn’t want to finish one of your videos, but I knew you would nail it to the wall at the end. The folks at Disney who write all those cartoon songs that only a little kid would love should be worried about their jobs.
Imagine Anna “Tear It All Down” Indiana in control of the nukes.
Sadly, it doesn’t sound any worse than everything else on the charts.
Seeing this comment everywhere and lol no, it's significantly worse than even the worst shit you could randomly pull off of FM
@@dansullivan9152it really isn't though. Do you have any idea how many modern pop hits are little more than a single beat on loop for 4 minutes while someone lazily raps lyrics they probably came up with on the spot, don't rhyme, and repeat the same phrases over and over again? And they sell. Listen to Doja Cats "Paint the town red". Top of the charts like a month ago, and complete crap.
@@Trentstone121 you need your brain and/or ears checked, this is much much worse on every level
That was my reaction. The visual part is a bit weird but I've heard a lot, lot worse pop songs. Pop songs are mostly written to a formula and that's perfect for AI.
It won't be long before the entire Top 50 chart songs will be wholly or partly generated by AI, and I can't say I care. It will still leave a lot of scope for good indie music that won't sell much, which is the stuff I like.
The generative AI has been around a year or so. So, it's a great achievement to get there so fast. Imagine how good it will get in three years.
When an AI girl sings a song about being betrayed, I run! 👾
This isn't a good end product but its something a songwriter could use as a starting point, then modify it and make it something decent. I can see how it could be used as a tool for productivity etc...but honestly it worries me that young people might start completely relying on this for their songwriting. What happens when a whole generation doesn't know how to write a song without AI?
Meh. It's rudimentary. Only a beginner songwriter would bother to use this as a template. The chord progression is one of the most used chord progressions in western music. There's literally nothing special at all about that song, which is exactly what you should expect from AI considering how it works. Its output will ALWAYS be generic crap. Garbage in, garbage out.
@@Trentstone121 "The chord progression is one of the most used chord progressions in western music". That sounds like an indictment of human generated music more than a critique of AI generated music. There's literally nothing special about 90% of music today.
As far as how AI works, you are totally incorrect. New models learn the structure of music by training (learning) on millions of pieces of music. Not really a lot different in abstract than the way humans learn to play music. These deep learning models have only hit mainstream within the last year or so as the amount of compute power has exploded. However, progress is now extremely rapid and will easily outperform most of what we hear from the music industry today in short order.
@@Trentstone121 but it’s exactly the beginner songwriters that worry me. If a thirteen year old that wants to make music already has access to this tool, even if just to use it as a starting point, then there’s a lower chance that they will ever go through a phase of discovering more interesting chord progressions by themselves, or find what they really want to say by writing their lyrics from scratch.
That was simultaneously better and worse than I expected. Something like this could replace royalty-free music libraries in relatively short order if they used better MIDI instruments.
Sure. But that's an awfully low bar.
Great addition for The Axis Of Awesome's list of songs! 😄
“Let’s tear it all down” oh now skynet is hatching a plan already.
This should be the new theme song for Washington DC.
Rhett, have you considered doing voice overs as a side gig? You've got that natural voice mics love.
7:27 "I, for one, welcome our new robot overlords..."
Nice, Rhett, real nice.
An AI singing about tearing all of society down is downright creepy.
Oh my. Can you apply a Red Flag law to AI? I mean, it sounds like a manifesto.
I remember this "AI Talk" in chess world 20 years ago when computers start playing chess. Everyone was laughing,commenting . Past forward: Today,not even a World Champion has any,zero chances at playing chess vs computer. I see same future for the music. Imagine world where best composer in the world is proven million times from AI that he doesn't know everything and compositions that he's writing can be improved by 100 times. That is what's gonna happened,and there is no one to stop it.This is like 1st chess program,wait 10 years from now!!!
100% agreed about getting legislation in place NOW to protect both human creativity and AGI creativity before AGI gets here. If we wait, it will be too late for the legal system to respond. If we already have something in place to acknowledge and protect both sources of creativity, I think things will go much smoother.
I think the laws surrounding sampling should be enough legal protection for musicians to keep AI users from using their work without permission. We've seen how bad it can get without that protection with visual artists. That said, it's not going to take long for AI music to catch up. I give it a year, maybe 18 months. Any genre based around digital sounds will be easy to recreate. It's the feel and nuance that humans bring to music that the AI music will lack, but unfortunately we've seen that people don't really miss that. Lots of music is quantized and sounds robotic, and most people don't seem to mind. That's the really scary part, not that AI will replace musicians, but that most people wouldn't even notice or care if it happened.
Actually it is frightening.
Thank God that AI can't improve on itself...oh, wait a minute...
As soon as I heard the first chord, I knew the chord progression already lol
Rhett, do one of these videos every month with what is actually considered the state of the art for this kind of generated content (if it can be found). I am quite sure it will get a lot better very quickly. As for this, it is probably using terrible general midi for sounds, rather than a state of the art library. Imagine instead of this going through some AI online engine it was an assistant in GarageBand that could create and drag in loops from its library, take lyrics and create a sung melody. I imagine that is what is really coming next - there will be someone in the driver's seat. I already have plug-ins with random patch generation - I just need to say when to stop. In the end, I think there will be great stuff coming from generated art, and it will be made by talented artists - they just won't need music chops, just good ears and taste.
It's art, man. Sure to be a hit.
This is awful, BUT the fact that it exists crazy. It’s not really about what it is now, but what it will be in the near future.
In the future, itll be just as bad, because AI is NOT INTELLIGENT. Its just drawing from multiple sources of large databases and TRYING to make something without understanding any of the actual human nuances that go behind it.
What WILL happen is that corporations will use AI generated material as a foundation, then severely underpay actual artists/musicians/producers/performers to perfect the track.
naaah.@@teddy3k3
The issue with this is that we're thinking about this as musicians and songwriters. To a lot of regular people, things like chord progressions, melodies, etc. aren't of consequence. All it's gonna take is that first AI-manufactured hit before things spiral out of hand even further.
The problem is that some people are actually going to like this.
"It sounds awful" sums up a lot of music these days unfortunately, but yes this AI is not good
Music is written with emotions...human emotions. Artificial intelligence doesn't have and may never have the ability to deliver emotion at a human level.
But she feels betrayed and wants to burn it all.
the closet thing in reality is a narcissistic human,the only kind of human an ai can emulate.They don't have real feelings either 🥴
This is like most things AI can currently do. It can create but it’s not great. It can be used as an assistant but can not replace.
A great follow up video to this would be to get a band together and re-write the song and try to make it something great. That’s how AI should be used.
The thing that worries me is thinking of the amount of traffic on music apps in the future with people uploading AI music. trying to get anywhere would be so hard, and when it gets to the point where people can just type in a song they want and get it without any time, work and effort from an artist. Screens and charts of just silicon art and plastic faces it’ll be hell. I feel like the music trend of the future will be making music that sounds the least robotic as possible with the least electronic aspects that the artist can because I think that’ll be the only way you can stand out when it gets to the point of AI sounding convincing enough to make money from
rhett needs to do a stand up show I can't stop laughing at his reactions
It would be the worst standup show ever.
@@RhettShull AI is like, "Hold my stolen routine."
@@RhettShull maybe generate a routine using AI?
@@RhettShull We could instruct an AI to replicate you reacting to your own standup routine. I think you'd take over the world at that point...
The streaming companies can benefit from producing this AI crap, b/c they won't have to pay royalties to these crap-bots. Unfortunately, I am not optimistic that AI can benefit the arts, especially music. Corporate greed casts a pretty heavy shadow over any potential benefits so far.
Holy Christ this is HEINOUS!
Thanks, Rhett, for a sober, reflective talk on the state of AI in music. Right now, it is truly terrible. I have my doubts that computers will ever 'make' a realistic guitar part - at least I hope not.
I think I heard a Duane Allman lick in there somewhere. 😂
If they really are faking Duane Allman licks, we can't let it slide.
I must be stuck in the dark ages, as I don't understand the purpose of AI and why there is a crazy concern that we develop AI. Nothing can beat human ingenuity. We should be more concerned with other things in life than this!! As far as this video is concerned, this could be a precursor of things to come. We used to say the same thing to midi when it first came out in the late 70's early 80's.
AI will be able to do "the fiddly bits" that humans can't, like assembly line robots, i prefer bard to google cos i can talk in english and it talks in english back at me, we had a conversation about a fake guitar on ebay and between us we confirmed it was fake, even though i had to correct bard about it's first assessment. AI will eventually be smarter than humans - at the least it will be a zillion einstein's instead of one massive super brain, it depends on how good we are at making it, and whether there is a limit to intelligence anyway, could be you can't get smarter than einstein....
people are concerned though because of the "terminator" / skynet thing, where your computer doesn't want to be switched off and it finds a way to electrocute you on the internet....
Yes, you're right. Nothing can beat human ingenuity. That's why the globalists want this tech shit: to eliminate it.
Everything about globalism is dehumanizing. Saying "their" when referring to one person; calling people "humans" instead of men, women, or children; the absurd falsehood of there being no difference between men and women...etc. ad k!ll-me-am.
I think as musicians, we have a slight (!) advantage compared to other areas: Look how convincing AI image generation/manipulation has become. This is a serious challenge for photographers and visual artists. I don't know what's a good approach to handle this in a sensible way, but we can watch AI image generation/manipulation and see what will happen to AI-generated music a couple of years (or just months) later. And maybe be prepared a little better.
Thanks Rhett, That we are even discussing AI generated art as good or bad is disconcerting. Art should be an expression of humankind for humankind, not of computer programed algorithms for the sake of "look what we can do". Terrifying.
She gonna make millions. Just think though a few years ago pong was the greatest thing
Don't be cocky. This will be fantastically accomplished in just two or three years. It's terrifying.
The problem is somebody's gonna take the bones of it and re recorded as their own creation... And no doubt not tell anybody that ai wrote it.
Is she singing for our own demise? Kinda sounds like it
It took me a minute to figure out what was wrong with the AI girl. Her body below her neck is totally frozen but her face is moving.
It took you that long ;)
Cheap animation.
Hey, Rhett, I agree with you on the composition end of this, since I have been writing music since I was 16, and I'm 65 now. But allegorically, think about it. Consider AI talking about tearing it all down - like human society. But I could be donning a tin hat on that, but not entirely. Instrumentally, I am 100% with you. it sucks. If AI takes lessons from the Classical or 70s genres, AI could become a force to be reckoned with, but for now, no. I am totally down with the idea of legislation and limitations.
As bad as this is Rhett, musicians like you and me should already be worried. AI doesn't stop, it doesn't sleep, it learns every single day. The other thing is that AI learns from us. If it sounds like shit, then it's been listening to shit and that's an indictment on current popular music.
May I make an observation?? Every single time I hear any perspective or feedback about anything generated by AI it's pretty much the same. It's never good feedback. Words like frightening, odd, half a$$, obvious.. I'm of the mind set that AI will go the way of farm raised fish. It'll be a thing for some but anyone with taste for something of higher meaning and quality will always go for the human made stuff.
I've heard cat fights with better melody
It’s is so sad. Totally agree, people don’t care about artists. Thanks for this video.
I think you are underestimating how far this has come. Sure, it sounds bad to us "real" musicians but it is quite amazing that this was generated with no human interaction or influence. All it will take is a few genius programmers who are also genius musicians and sound engineers to tweak the code and we will start to see some truly amzing ai music. Criticizing chord progressions, instrument choices, tone and lyric arrangements is piddly nitpicking on things that are very easily tweaked.
You better watchout AI may send the crunchbots after you and burn out all your internet connected stuff.
Betrayed by this channel…. Let’s tear it all down… 😂