In my whole life I think the best holy work I ever did is to Choose Sanskrit as masters.Its the only language through which u can connect to ur roots.Feeling really proud.When she was chanting the shlokas , it feels so devine so crystal clear.
I would love to learn Sanskrit properly, even academically, (I'm a teenager), but I'm not sure about what career options are possible through that. Do you maybe have any advice in that regard?
In which nation, in which religio,n in which civilization, can you find a woman so scholarly, so learned, so eager to spread knowledge of dharma..she is such a reservoir of pure nectar of wisdom! This is Bharat!
ISrael will occupy India easily . instead of puranas, scientific temperament must be spread across India which can save our future generation , not age old story.
@@Padmanabham. namaskaar Anna ... everything is available in English also sir....the original text ..is available ...the kambana Ramayana is also available in Tamil language ..written by great scholars ........if you like plz cheak ...thankyou
This channel is the future ! Keep Going Arihant Bhai ! Slowly but surely you will see exponential growth. The name, symbol, conversations everything is on point.
I love this women, She is the best example of how women should be, This is also possible if you are educated in our ancient literature. She is sweet, elegant, Super smart
26:00 Actually, in Valmiki's Ramayan, there is almost no case of Shri Rama himself conducting miracles. A major difference b/w Valmiki and others is that in Valmiki, Shri Rama was a mortal who had no idea about the fact that he was Narayan. This was important b'cos Ravan's boon from Brahma precluded him from being killed by Vishnu: it also explains why Parashurama, who _knew_ that he was Vishnu, wasn't recruited for this job. That's why even when Indra was visiting a rishi (I forget his name), he made it a point not to see Rama or else he would have bowed to him, giving the latter a hint. In the serial, everybody knows that Rama is Vishnu, but in reality, it was only a few rishis - Vasishtha, Vishwamitra, Agastya, Valmiki, Gautama, Bharadwaj, et al who knew it. It was only after Ravan's death that Brahma appeared and told Rama who he really was
@@DevaEkoNaaraayanah Not if you believe Brahma's boon to Ravan was genuine If Vishnu was allowed to know himself inspite of a disguise he took, like he did in previous avatars, then he _himself_ could have taken on Ravan. But Ravan boasted about him or his sons taking on Vishnu directly, and the boon that he had from Brahma _precluded_ him being killed by Vishnu. That's why Parashuram wasn't assigned the task, and why Vishnu had to take birth as a man who was born _without_ those powers and had to build that up over several years. Like I mentioned above, it was only _after_ the death of Ravan that Brahma came and told him who he was, and _after_ that, he probably _was_ aware of his own divinity What Tulsidas and others assume is that Vishnu just took the guise of Rama, and everybody knew it. While his motivation might have been inspiring devotion, had it happened the way he described, Brahma's boon to Ravan would have been falsified
Is Uttarkaand an interpolation or was it a part of the original text ?? Opinion of Bibek Debroy who has translated the critical edition of Valmiki Ramayana about Uttarkaand: "Most scholars agree ‘Uttara Kanda’was written much later. If one reads the'Uttara kanda’, that belief is instantly endorsed.The ‘Uttara Kanda’ doesn’t belong. This isn’t only because of the content, which is invariably mentioned. It is also because of the texture of the text, the quality of the poetry.It is vastly inferior." He has said the same thing about the Uttarkaand in the introduction section of both ramayan and mahabharat translated by him. Opinion of Ralph T.H. Griffith who was the first person to completely translate the valmiki ramayan in English in 1874 "The Ramayan ends epically complete, with the triumphant return of Rama and his rescued queen to Ayodhya and his consecration and coronation in the capital of his forefathers. Even if the story were not complete, the conclusion of the last canto of the sixth Book evidently the work of a later hand than Valmiki’s, which speaks of Rama’s glorious and happy reign and promises blessings to those who read and hear the Ramayan, would be sufficient to show that, when these verses were added, the poem was considered to be finished."
@@atz1091 Bhai I have watched that video and I do admire his work as well but it doesn't mean that one has to agree with everything he has to say. He has incorrectly said that markandeya in mahabharat has quoted from Uttarakaand. In reality Raavan's origin story narrated by markandeya in Vana Parv of Mahabharat is completely different from what is written in Uttarakaand. You can read both the versions yourself. If one takes an atheistic approach like he has taken in his analysis then it can also be said that many of the Puranas he is referencing are actually much later works even as late as 5-6th century AD and that's the reason they have the events of uttara kaand in their abridged versions. And anyone who is doing a big task of adding a complete kanda in the original text will atleast put an effort to read the complete original text first and then make whatever changes are needed in the shlokas to make his work look authentic and consistent. So it's not that big a deal if there is a shloka that says that "the complete text contains 6 kaand and an uttar kand". Like Ami Ganatra said there are convincing arguments both in favour of and against uttara kaand being an interpolation. So the best approach is to read the text and decide for yourself. Even if you just read the Valmiki's version of sundar kaand from chapter 2 from the point where hanuman lands on the shores of Lanka after crossing the sea and then read the Uttara kaand you can clearly understand that Valmiki's knack of describing seasons, flaura and vegetation, paintings, buildings, and infact the very essence , richness and quality of literature is missing from Uttarakaand. One doesn't even have to be a philologist or a linguist to understand it. Anyone in a right frame of mind can observe the ridiculously different standards of writing. And this is the very reason most scholars agree that Uttarakaand is an interpolation apart from the fact that it has several inconsistencies as well from the other six kandas.
@@nipunjoshi8238 if I am not wrong. Bibek Debroy once said that there are chances that Ramayan happened much later after Mahabharat 😂 Read his translations but never trust his opinions 🙏
@@shubhamkumardas1476 haan lekin isi opinion ko oppose karte hue usne ye bhi bola hai ki mahabharat me ramayan ke bohot saare references hain...lekin ramayan me mahabharat ke nahi hain....which suggests ki ramayan pehle hui hai.
There was a presentation on the Jaipur Dialogues last Diwali by Rajni Raman Jha that precisely addresses this. Based on that, it's convincing that Maharani Sita's exile didn't happen. The story of Shambuka is even easier to disprove
मांस दाल आदि को भी कहते हैं संस्कृत में न तो पांडव ही और नही श्री राम आदि मांसाहार करते थे रामायण आदि में भी बुद्ध और परवर्ती काल में विक्षिप्त भाग जोड़े गए हैं अर्थात मिलावट की गई है
I don't understand why these kind of authors are not publishing books in local languages or at least in Hindi along with English. publishing only in English literally makes it usable to very tiny fraction of people. people who really need to read this can't read it.
I love the fact that most of the mainstream podcasters in india are going towards shorter time span and vaad is doing what actually a podcast is Keep it up
अमीजी नमस्कार 🙏🙏 अरिहंत जी जयजिनेंद्र 🙏🙏 मैंने... रामायण के कयी एडीशन पढें है...जैसे श्री वाल्मिकी रामायण, श्री गोस्वामी तुलसीदास रचित ( आत्माराम दुबे के पुत्र )रामचरित मानस , अद्भुत रामायण by श्री वाल्मिकी ऋषी, तमिल महाकवी कंबन जी की कंब रामायनम.... जैन रामायण (पद्मपुराण) ....फिर भी मैंने आपका पूरा इन्टरव्हू सुना और आपके सच्चे और अच्छे प्रयासों के लिये बहुत बहुत बधाई 👌👌🙏🙏
17:00 Ram Charit Manas is just the Hindi/Avadi version of the Ramayan, and it was written during the Mughal era. Same goes for Krittivas, Kamban and others. In Ananda Sagar's Ramayan, he mixes them up a bit, but in Uttarkand, he pulls in bizarre sources, like the Jataka tales and Panchatantra for his sources. If one is talking _history_ , Valmiki is the only legitimate source, since he was a contemporary of Shri Rama. Tulsidas and everyone else are local adaptations of the story, but w/ a lot added and a lot deleted
That's not how Hinduism works. Tulsidas was enlightened and so he could see in the past just like valmiki, ved vyasa. Tulsidas's ram is a ram of a previous yuga cycle and not the same as valmiki ramayan.
@@paharipant2 Fine, but in that case, it's not history like Valmiki Ramayan is. Also, you probably meant previous manvantara, not yuga, since Rama avatars are always treta yugas
Thankyou so so so much. We need this as many Hindus believe what they see in serials movies. Like Santoshi non existent, now even got temples. Superstition and over the top bhakti where fundamentals basics of Sanata Dharam are ignored. This is much needed Jaya Jaya Sri SitaRam 🙏🙏
Great conversation, one of the best guests on 'Vaad'. Respect her humility, gyan and refreshing narrative🙏. Of course Arihant one of the best Indic podcaster
I also had same feeling before listening the podcast. But the way she speak so passionately is just mind-blowing. She immersed herself in the story and speak like a child like enthusiasm. Which is really a wonderful quality to have for public speaking.
Podcast is good and informative, I was used to be proud on my name; Karan was such a great warrior n all but after this that myth is broken. It seems like Karan was more Shakuni than Shakuni himself.
ami ji ne pichhale podcast mein kahaa tha that she will write on ramayana as well.... unhone bola aur unhone apna promise pura kiya... It is really great to listen her regarding these scriptures... Thank you so much Ami ji to make us aware with the facts.
Amazing discussion, puts into context what immense knowledge we are missing out on by not having the understanding of Sanskrit! Thanks for hosting such people Arihant!
What an incredible episode. Please please call her back and discuss Ramayana and Mahabharata more. We can listen to Amiji for hours! We need more of such podcast to tell the new generation what actually our epics are.
Agar ravan ko shrap tha ki ma Sita ko sparsh krte hi uska sar pht jayega to phir unka harad krte samay bhi to unka chua tha , tb phir vah kyun nhi mara??🤔🙄
2:00:00 Also, contrary to what's shown in the serials, Shri Rama _never_ made a vow to be monogamous. Yeah, he ended up w/ Sita as his only wife in his lifetime, but there was never a demand that he marry again. For the Ashwamedha yagna, he did use a golden statue of Sita
Anyone getting emotional over my sister in Dharam words remember you don't say anything when our Dev Devis are insulted but when her true words of light are taking you out of darkness your mind will get angry it wants to stay in ignorance she is making it relatable for everyday people and no one is perfect Hara Hara Mahadev 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
I love valmiki ramayan and it is totally different from Chutiya Sagar arts series ... Yes sagar arts showed the shit to people and people are fools to blindly believe that ... I have been telling this to anyone i meet, that read the book valmiki ramayan only and dont see TV ...
2 hrs. Really worth listening, समयातित एवं सुश्राव्य 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼 जय रघुनन्दन जय सियावर राम🚩 अमी जी की वाणी मे पुन्हच रामायण अत्यंत सुरस तथा सुगम लगा। धन्यवाद🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼💕
Can you make english subtitles for these videos? I can understand most of the words but not all. It will reach a lot of people especially in south india.
She speaks and I visualize…. This is the true example of oral tradition. I am one of those who left India but still cant stop thinking about our history day in and out. One day I shall come back and connect to my roots again. Love from Toronto 🫶🏼❤️🙏
i was waiting for this video impatiently! it was on the video of her first book here on mahabharata that i got to know about her. now she is so dear to me, and is such a respectful person in my eyes, she is my sole inspiration now to become an author, especially on the truth of our great ancient past
@@Padmanabham. yes yes! we all need to start reading our granthas and learn the various knowledge imparted by the rishis, and also imbibe all the good from it into our lives, like ami ji.
@@shubhamjha4754 i guess thats a nice compliment. thankyou for that!😃 and i'd really like to know where else u have seen my comment. or if we have had any conversation in someone's comment section, and on what topic😄
one question I have always wondered when we say vaanar does it mean Van-nar (humans of the jungles) or vaanar as in the primates of the jungle (monkey species) ?
Mata Sita ke sath ye sab tb hua, jb Ravan ko sharap ka darr tha r unski kuchh krne ki himmat ni padi....... Agar dubhagya se Ravan kuchh kr deta. tb to pta ni kya kr dete Mata ke sath...... Rama ji bhale hi samj ke lie ye sab kia ho....... lakin ye to kaha hi ja skta hai ki us waqt ka samj misogynist tha.....
अहल्या पत्थर नही पर पत्थरवत...पत्थर जैसी हो जाती है। क्योकि गौतम मुनि आश्रम छोड़कर चले जाते है तो आश्रम उज्जड हो जाता है।अहल्या अकेली रहती है।अकेला इन्सान जड़....पत्थर जैसा हो जाता है।यह रूपक है।
The ultimate destiny of Shri Rama is getting physically distant with her beloved Shri Sita maa...but the cords of their hearts are forever tied..The lesson i got from this episode is love is forever..it is not conditional...it is not physical...love is not that wheb you hold on to that person ...love is something that can't take any nonsense for the person you love....and that is bigger than everything and that makes RAma-sita a forever tale of love.
Meating eating wrong interpretation.. Hiran ke par khusbu wali i forgetting the name and same thing is used as medicine also.. चतुर्दश हि वर्षाणि वत्स्यामि विजने वने | मधु मूल फलैः जीवन् हित्वा मुनिवद् आमिषम् || २-२०-२९ स ष्ट्चाअष्टौ च वर्षाणि वत्स्यामि विजने वने | आसेवमानो वन्यानि फलमूलैश्च चर्तयन् || २-२०-३१
श्वेत वध भिष्म पितामह द्वारा नियम विरुद्ध किया प्रतिदिन 10 हजार राजाओं का वध भी नियम विरुद्ध इलावन का वध भी नियम विरुद्ध था भिष्म द्वारा शस्त्र त्यागना उनकी गलती है भगवान कृष्ण ने कभी कोई नियम नहीं तोड़ा
Understandable! I believe there is no authentic valmiki ramayan existing in modern day india or anywhere in the world and the reason being that the foreign invaders who burnt the universities whose libraries burnt for months to completely destroy the knowledge we had and what i feel and what my point is that the authentic Ramayan of Maharshi Valmiki and Authentic Mahabharat of Maharshi Ved Vyas got burnt into ashes and then these people's creative liberty versions spread in fame and that's what we learn :)
ये बात सरासर गलत है कि वे मांस खाते थे ।ये आप मनुस्मृति मैं पढ़ सकते है जो रामायण से भी पहले लिखी गई है । मांस खाने वाली अन्य जातियां थी जैसे राक्षस, दानव , असुर, कई आदिवासी जातियां । मनुष्य मांस का सेवन नही करते थे और महाज्ञानी राम और पांडव तो बिल्कुल नही। तजोड और जानकारी इकट्ठा कीजिये ।
Thank you sir for such content...plz sir do a podocast about british crimes committed on Indiam woman & children ...we know there economic & political exploytation but there crime are beyond that we must put light on that...
50:00 koi kshatriya ho chahe shudra ho agr ham sanatani hai to, non veg is not for us, ye kshatriya non-veg khane lge to ye justify ho gya ki non veg hi duism m kha skte hai? Aur shree raam jo ki bi a kisi karan kisi chiti ko bhi haani na pahucha yen, wo apni bhukh aur sareer k bal k liye non veg khayenge, is there any sense in it. I don't think so Ami I'm disagring with you on this topic.
Ami ji, Shri Ram and Yudhishthir ji were not non-vegetarian. And the context you are quoting from mahabharat clearly states that they used to kill aggressive animals only not eat them. Also, in mahabharat bhishm ji has mentioned names of various kshatriyas like harishchandra who have never eated non-veg things. So please correct. Thanks
She has beautiful voice. She should consider releasing in audio book form too.
Agree
🪔🚩🇮🇳 👌🙏✊ 🇮🇳🚩🪔
Fully agree.
The passion comes out in her voice.
Fully agree
💯
🎉
I can listen to Ami ma'am talking about Ramayana and Mahabharata for ever!
Aap sahi bol rahe mai bhi😁
@@vaishalipandey3221 🙌🏼
💯
gita press se mahabharat kharid aur padho aur bachon ko padhao
@Satyendra Upadhyay read it already. but the way she dives into stuff that really piques my interest even more. it makes me think and question.
This is called real Satsang, where you learn great things about history, culture and Dharma. Jay Shree Ram.
So true!
Agree
Right muje be ye bahut pasand ish type ke video..
Jo Bo guru hote hai baith ker bolte hai muje lgta hai unko jyda knowledge he nhi hoti hai... .
Chutiye you live your life in satsang.. therefore you are idiotic and will spoil your life..
True !
वाल्मीकि रामायण में स्वयंवर नही है। स्वयंवर की बात राम चरित मानस में आया है।
In my whole life I think the best holy work I ever did is to Choose Sanskrit as masters.Its the only language through which u can connect to ur roots.Feeling really proud.When she was chanting the shlokas , it feels so devine so crystal clear.
So honest and simple and clear
Gretest decision ma'am
भारत भूषा संस्कृत भाषा👌🙏
Dhanyavas Aisha, has inspired me more to learn Sanskrit
I would love to learn Sanskrit properly, even academically, (I'm a teenager), but I'm not sure about what career options are possible through that. Do you maybe have any advice in that regard?
This has opened many eyes I bet. Ami and Arihant have made this podcast a treat.
The excitement in Ami is beyond words.
Most underrated Indian UA-cam channel...sad..... welcome ami ji
In one year, the kind of success this channel has achieved, is no less by any standard.
It will grow with time bro , indians are new to knowledge based podcasts , this channel doing fine
Yeah bro absolutely true... 👍🏻
Yes bhai... do not be sad .... :D...
ua-cam.com/play/PLzT1yw_wugHB8lcho3VBnkkMwl36KwThb.html 🙏 Hare Krishna Hari bol 👍🙏😀
In which nation, in which religio,n in which civilization, can you find a woman so scholarly, so learned, so eager to spread knowledge of dharma..she is such a reservoir of pure nectar of wisdom! This is Bharat!
Truly said!
ISrael will occupy India easily . instead of puranas, scientific temperament must be spread across India which can save our future generation , not age old story.
@@Redrose-xs9gz yeah..i know by 2047, india will be islamic state...according to people following arabian aboriginal tribal law books...what a 🤣 joke!
@@Redrose-xs9gz isreal can only defeat allahs countries। Like it has 4 times before।
exactly my thoughts. vidushi hain ye
Have read her first book on Mahabharata, truly it cleared many myths.
Eagerly waiting for the Ramayana one
History
I've read her first book, and it was eye-opening. Can't wait to read her next book!
?
@@Padmanabham. realy .valmiki aur vyas treasure trunk nahe de sake ..madam ne de Diya hay
@@Padmanabham. namaskaar Anna ... everything is available in English also sir....the original text ..is available ...the kambana Ramayana is also available in Tamil language ..written by great scholars ........if you like plz cheak ...thankyou
@@indradhanush5444 madam ne keval simplify kiya hai , Aam admi ke liye ..
@@shashanksrivastava4952 kaun sa aam aadmi ?
Yehe agar k aadmi simyfy karta tab bhe yehe kehte ?
Hearing Ami Ganatra is such a pleasure 🙏
Amiji Great Scholar nice
This channel is the future ! Keep Going Arihant Bhai ! Slowly but surely you will see exponential growth. The name, symbol, conversations everything is on point.
ABSOLUTELY RIGHT! THERE WILL BE A TIME OF EXPONENTIAL GROWTH!
I love this women, She is the best example of how women should be, This is also possible if you are educated in our ancient literature. She is sweet, elegant, Super smart
जब से इनकी पहली वीडियो देखी थी तभी से प्रतिक्षा थी इस वीडियो की
She is amazing and she really loves to talk about ramayan and Mahabharata
Man Arihant is the best host of a Podcast. Knows when to interrupt, lets the other person speak, very patient, sticks to the topic, etc
yes, arihant is really great.
Ranveer Alhabadia.. 😂😂
@@samsung123451tumhari id mst hai bhai teresa ko bhi nhi chhoda😂😂😂
26:00 Actually, in Valmiki's Ramayan, there is almost no case of Shri Rama himself conducting miracles. A major difference b/w Valmiki and others is that in Valmiki, Shri Rama was a mortal who had no idea about the fact that he was Narayan. This was important b'cos Ravan's boon from Brahma precluded him from being killed by Vishnu: it also explains why Parashurama, who _knew_ that he was Vishnu, wasn't recruited for this job. That's why even when Indra was visiting a rishi (I forget his name), he made it a point not to see Rama or else he would have bowed to him, giving the latter a hint. In the serial, everybody knows that Rama is Vishnu, but in reality, it was only a few rishis - Vasishtha, Vishwamitra, Agastya, Valmiki, Gautama, Bharadwaj, et al who knew it. It was only after Ravan's death that Brahma appeared and told Rama who he really was
Exactly! This fact must be kept in mind while trying to make sense of Ramayana
So When he was Vishnu, He actually knew it but Lokavyavhaar k liye he behaved that way
@@DevaEkoNaaraayanah Not if you believe Brahma's boon to Ravan was genuine
If Vishnu was allowed to know himself inspite of a disguise he took, like he did in previous avatars, then he _himself_ could have taken on Ravan. But Ravan boasted about him or his sons taking on Vishnu directly, and the boon that he had from Brahma _precluded_ him being killed by Vishnu. That's why Parashuram wasn't assigned the task, and why Vishnu had to take birth as a man who was born _without_ those powers and had to build that up over several years. Like I mentioned above, it was only _after_ the death of Ravan that Brahma came and told him who he was, and _after_ that, he probably _was_ aware of his own divinity
What Tulsidas and others assume is that Vishnu just took the guise of Rama, and everybody knew it. While his motivation might have been inspiring devotion, had it happened the way he described, Brahma's boon to Ravan would have been falsified
@@vrishIF Tulsidas ji doesn't believe that Vishnu took Avataar as Shree Raam.
He Believed Lord Raam Himself took Avataar !!
Prabhu Shree Ram maante nehi the maante the ki woh bhagwan vishnu ke avtar hein. Aur dusra Vanar aur riksh ka saath milega toh Ravan aur uske adharm purv lanka ka nash hoga vardan aur shrap dono hi tha. Isliye Prabhu Shree Ram aur Laxman ji ko Hanuman ji, Jambavantji aur baki vanar aur riksho ka sahayta chahiye tha.
Ami is way ahead of our kathakars in explaining Ramayan. Very good. I will buy her both books.
Book kaha se purchase kare ????
Is Uttarkaand an interpolation or was it a part of the original text ??
Opinion of Bibek Debroy who has translated the critical edition of Valmiki Ramayana about Uttarkaand:
"Most scholars agree ‘Uttara Kanda’was written much later. If one reads the'Uttara kanda’, that belief is instantly endorsed.The ‘Uttara Kanda’ doesn’t belong. This isn’t only because of the content, which is invariably mentioned. It is also because of the texture of the text, the quality of the poetry.It is vastly inferior."
He has said the same thing about the Uttarkaand in the introduction section of both ramayan and mahabharat translated by him.
Opinion of Ralph T.H. Griffith who was the first person to completely translate the valmiki ramayan in English in 1874
"The Ramayan ends epically complete, with the triumphant return of Rama and his rescued queen to Ayodhya and his consecration and coronation in the capital of his forefathers. Even if the story were not complete, the conclusion of the last canto of the sixth Book evidently the work of a later hand than Valmiki’s, which speaks of Rama’s glorious and happy reign and promises blessings to those who read and hear the Ramayan, would be sufficient to show that, when these verses were added, the poem was considered to be finished."
There is a brilliant documentary by Project Shivoham on the matter (UA-cam). Watch it.
@@atz1091 Bhai I have watched that video and I do admire his work as well but it doesn't mean that one has to agree with everything he has to say.
He has incorrectly said that markandeya in mahabharat has quoted from Uttarakaand. In reality Raavan's origin story narrated by markandeya in Vana Parv of Mahabharat is completely different from what is written in Uttarakaand. You can read both the versions yourself.
If one takes an atheistic approach like he has taken in his analysis then it can also be said that many of the Puranas he is referencing are actually much later works even as late as 5-6th century AD and that's the reason they have the events of uttara kaand in their abridged versions.
And anyone who is doing a big task of adding a complete kanda in the original text will atleast put an effort to read the complete original text first and then make whatever changes are needed in the shlokas to make his work look authentic and consistent. So it's not that big a deal if there is a shloka that says that "the complete text contains 6 kaand and an uttar kand".
Like Ami Ganatra said there are convincing arguments both in favour of and against uttara kaand being an interpolation. So the best approach is to read the text and decide for yourself.
Even if you just read the Valmiki's version of sundar kaand from chapter 2 from the point where hanuman lands on the shores of Lanka after crossing the sea
and then read the Uttara kaand you can clearly understand that Valmiki's knack of describing seasons, flaura and vegetation, paintings, buildings, and infact the very essence , richness and quality of literature is missing from Uttarakaand.
One doesn't even have to be a philologist or a linguist to understand it. Anyone in a right frame of mind can observe the ridiculously different standards of writing. And this is the very reason most scholars agree that Uttarakaand is an interpolation apart from the fact that it has several inconsistencies as well from the other six kandas.
@@nipunjoshi8238 if I am not wrong. Bibek Debroy once said that there are chances that Ramayan happened much later after Mahabharat 😂
Read his translations but never trust his opinions 🙏
@@shubhamkumardas1476 haan lekin isi opinion ko oppose karte hue usne ye bhi bola hai ki mahabharat me ramayan ke bohot saare references hain...lekin ramayan me mahabharat ke nahi hain....which suggests ki ramayan pehle hui hai.
There was a presentation on the Jaipur Dialogues last Diwali by Rajni Raman Jha that precisely addresses this. Based on that, it's convincing that Maharani Sita's exile didn't happen. The story of Shambuka is even easier to disprove
मांस दाल आदि को भी कहते हैं संस्कृत में
न तो पांडव ही और नही श्री राम आदि मांसाहार करते थे
रामायण आदि में भी बुद्ध और परवर्ती काल में विक्षिप्त भाग जोड़े गए हैं अर्थात मिलावट की गई है
52:37 मांस खाते थे क्षत्रिय,बिल्कुल सत्य बात है,लेकिन श्रीराम जी ने नहीं खाया था,कुछ भी बोल देती हो madam...
रावण ने ही शूर्पनखा के पति विद्युज्जिह्वा की हत्या की थी। वह क्यों शूर्पनखा की चिंता करेगा?!
I don't understand why these kind of authors are not publishing books in local languages or at least in Hindi along with English. publishing only in English literally makes it usable to very tiny fraction of people. people who really need to read this can't read it.
Becoz indian only valuee things when it is in english and approved by west example yoga ayureda popularize after west approvved it sadly but true
I love the fact that most of the mainstream podcasters in india are going towards shorter time span and vaad is doing what actually a podcast is
Keep it up
अमीजी नमस्कार 🙏🙏
अरिहंत जी जयजिनेंद्र 🙏🙏
मैंने... रामायण के कयी एडीशन पढें है...जैसे श्री वाल्मिकी रामायण, श्री गोस्वामी तुलसीदास रचित ( आत्माराम दुबे के पुत्र )रामचरित मानस , अद्भुत रामायण by श्री वाल्मिकी ऋषी, तमिल महाकवी कंबन जी की कंब रामायनम.... जैन रामायण (पद्मपुराण) ....फिर भी मैंने आपका पूरा इन्टरव्हू सुना
और आपके सच्चे और अच्छे प्रयासों के लिये बहुत बहुत बधाई 👌👌🙏🙏
बंटाई
Ami Ganatra is one of the few writers who knows Sanskit well, otherwise people are happy to read english translation rather than their own devbhasha
जय सियाराम ।
कृपया इस पुस्तक का भी हिन्दी अनुवाद शीघ्रताशीघ्र उपलब्ध कराएँ ।
Ami is a wonder woman
Has the sweetest voice
So learned in her field
Sensitivity is supreme
To state a few of her qualities..
17:00 Ram Charit Manas is just the Hindi/Avadi version of the Ramayan, and it was written during the Mughal era. Same goes for Krittivas, Kamban and others. In Ananda Sagar's Ramayan, he mixes them up a bit, but in Uttarkand, he pulls in bizarre sources, like the Jataka tales and Panchatantra for his sources. If one is talking _history_ , Valmiki is the only legitimate source, since he was a contemporary of Shri Rama. Tulsidas and everyone else are local adaptations of the story, but w/ a lot added and a lot deleted
That's not how Hinduism works. Tulsidas was enlightened and so he could see in the past just like valmiki, ved vyasa. Tulsidas's ram is a ram of a previous yuga cycle and not the same as valmiki ramayan.
@@paharipant2 Fine, but in that case, it's not history like Valmiki Ramayan is. Also, you probably meant previous manvantara, not yuga, since Rama avatars are always treta yugas
Real ramayan is only valmiki ramayan in 6 kands
@@paharipant2 Tulsidas wrote as a devotee in his own expression while Valmiki Ramayana is original
Thankyou so so so much. We need this as many Hindus believe what they see in serials movies. Like Santoshi non existent, now even got temples. Superstition and over the top bhakti where fundamentals basics of Sanata Dharam are ignored. This is much needed Jaya Jaya Sri SitaRam 🙏🙏
Great conversation, one of the best guests on 'Vaad'. Respect her humility, gyan and refreshing narrative🙏. Of course Arihant one of the best Indic podcaster
This whole podcast is so beautiful..made my day 😇🙏
Looking forward to reading the book.
Before starting this podcast I thought 2 hours ka hai baapre and now it’s ending and I am like chota pad gaya
I also had same feeling before listening the podcast. But the way she speak so passionately is just mind-blowing. She immersed herself in the story and speak like a child like enthusiasm. Which is really a wonderful quality to have for public speaking.
नारी स्वरूपा मां को नमन🙏🚩
Podcast is good and informative,
I was used to be proud on my name; Karan was such a great warrior n all but after this that myth is broken. It seems like Karan was more Shakuni than Shakuni himself.
Ami Ganatra ma'am please start episode wise podcast. 🙏 Today's youth must listen to this... They are not into reading that much.
Visit her UA-cam channel
Super relevant and realistic explanations. Thank u so much
One of the rare videos which have added value tremendously.🙏🙏🙏
ami ji ne pichhale podcast mein kahaa tha that she will write on ramayana as well.... unhone bola aur unhone apna promise pura kiya... It is really great to listen her regarding these scriptures... Thank you so much Ami ji to make us aware with the facts.
Amazing discussion, puts into context what immense knowledge we are missing out on by not having the understanding of Sanskrit! Thanks for hosting such people Arihant!
Salute To Maa Saraswati!🙏🏻
Great Work Ma'am! Keep it up! 🙏🏻
What an incredible episode. Please please call her back and discuss Ramayana and Mahabharata more. We can listen to Amiji for hours! We need more of such podcast to tell the new generation what actually our epics are.
Thank you for this session, feeling so blesses as a Sanatani.
Also Check Ami Ganatra's book on Mahabharata.
Agar ravan ko shrap tha ki ma Sita ko sparsh krte hi uska sar pht jayega to phir unka harad krte samay bhi to unka chua tha , tb phir vah kyun nhi mara??🤔🙄
touch karne se nahi, balatkar karne se mar jata. wese to wo kisi woman ko touch hi nahi kar pata.
She has such a beautiful voice and her narration is graceful 🙏 Jai shree ram
So happy to see this episode today because yesterday only I have ordered this signed copy of ramayan unraveled .....thank u vaad once again
Is it available in english version sir? Jai shri Ram
I can listen to Ami Ganatra all day, she has so much knowledge.
This type of session is the eye opener to the society. Thanks to Arihant & Ami for this super engaging session
Her involvement in her work and her smile ❤️❤️♥️💘💝💖💞💕
'Taadka vadh' ka gyaan Modiji ko bhi lena chahiye aur Mamata banerjee ka vadh karna chahiye.. Chahe isse karne se Modiji ko apyash lage.
Are dhimmi ji pure desh me aag lgvane ko Raji hai Nobel prize ke liye
😂😂😂
Modi is no Ram
2:00:00 Also, contrary to what's shown in the serials, Shri Rama _never_ made a vow to be monogamous. Yeah, he ended up w/ Sita as his only wife in his lifetime, but there was never a demand that he marry again. For the Ashwamedha yagna, he did use a golden statue of Sita
Ami ji ko sunne mein pata nahin kyun itna achha lagta,her voice is just 😘😘😘😘😘
Anyone getting emotional over my sister in Dharam words remember you don't say anything when our Dev Devis are insulted but when her true words of light are taking you out of darkness your mind will get angry it wants to stay in ignorance she is making it relatable for everyday people and no one is perfect Hara Hara Mahadev 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Thanks Ami ji for all your efforts in this kind of satsang.... Jai Siyaram.... Jai Jai Jai Shree JanakiRam 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
I just love her....the way she explains things is mind blowing
WE NEED PEOPLE LIKE AMI IN THIS WORLD
Awesome channel and great conversation. Ami you are doing a great job.
Her voice is so sweet🙏 Thank you ma'am 🧡✨
I love valmiki ramayan and it is totally different from Chutiya Sagar arts series ... Yes sagar arts showed the shit to people and people are fools to blindly believe that ... I have been telling this to anyone i meet, that read the book valmiki ramayan only and dont see TV ...
Ramanand Sagar was a bloody crypto jew
हिंदी में दोनों संस्करण कब आएगा ,महाभारत वाला रामायण वाला??
Jai Shree Krishna 🙏🚩
2 hrs. Really worth listening, समयातित एवं सुश्राव्य 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼 जय रघुनन्दन जय सियावर राम🚩 अमी जी की वाणी मे पुन्हच रामायण अत्यंत सुरस तथा सुगम लगा। धन्यवाद🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼💕
There's a very good doc video by project shivoham on UttarKand of Ramayana.
राम जी ने बाली.को.छुप कर क्यों मारा
ua-cam.com/video/eMcg35TS-Kw/v-deo.html
A much better explanation
पहली बार दो घंटे का वीडियो मैंने पूरा देखा,,, ओ राम लग रहा, एक पूरा राम युग जी लिया। 🙏💐
Can you make english subtitles for these videos? I can understand most of the words but not all. It will reach a lot of people especially in south india.
You should purchase her book, it's in English
She speaks and I visualize…. This is the true example of oral tradition. I am one of those who left India but still cant stop thinking about our history day in and out. One day I shall come back and connect to my roots again. Love from Toronto 🫶🏼❤️🙏
I read the Mahabharata Unravelled and loved it, looking forward to reading this one. A fantastic discussion. 👏
It's strange that some new podcast channels with low content value have grown much more subscriber base than this intellectual level base.
Ami gantra's video is one of the highest watched on vaad channel, I watched that video 2-3 times... This is like a sequel of that...
बहुत ही सुन्दर, आप दोनो को बहुत धन्यवाद 🙏🏽
The most powerful name in this universe - Shree Ram.
I would recommend people to watch project shivoham's documentary on "uttar kand".
I already watched it
Yes surely everyone should watch
Already watched it, they have done great work!
antargatam avyaktam akhyatam hridyam ridhi - 44:12
अन्तर्गतं अव्यक्तं अख्यातं हृदयं ऋधि |
Correct me if I've interpreted wrongly.
i was waiting for this video impatiently! it was on the video of her first book here on mahabharata that i got to know about her. now she is so dear to me, and is such a respectful person in my eyes, she is my sole inspiration now to become an author, especially on the truth of our great ancient past
@@Padmanabham. yes yes! we all need to start reading our granthas and learn the various knowledge imparted by the rishis, and also imbibe all the good from it into our lives, like ami ji.
@@ankeetabose2059 I have seen your comments somewhere else😊😂😅
You are a Sigma trad female
@@shubhamjha4754 i guess thats a nice compliment. thankyou for that!😃 and i'd really like to know where else u have seen my comment. or if we have had any conversation in someone's comment section, and on what topic😄
The way these historical stories had been distorted and compeletly changed ..
This is so sad
one question I have always wondered when we say vaanar
does it mean Van-nar (humans of the jungles)
or vaanar as in the primates of the jungle (monkey species) ?
Mata Sita ke sath ye sab tb hua, jb Ravan ko sharap ka darr tha r unski kuchh krne ki himmat ni padi....... Agar dubhagya se Ravan kuchh kr deta. tb to pta ni kya kr dete Mata ke sath...... Rama ji bhale hi samj ke lie ye sab kia ho....... lakin ye to kaha hi ja skta hai ki us waqt ka samj misogynist tha.....
The best part of this channel is, you ask brief question and give maximum time to the speaker without interference 👏👏👏
अहल्या पत्थर नही पर पत्थरवत...पत्थर जैसी हो जाती है। क्योकि गौतम मुनि आश्रम छोड़कर चले जाते है तो आश्रम उज्जड हो जाता है।अहल्या अकेली रहती है।अकेला इन्सान जड़....पत्थर जैसा हो जाता है।यह रूपक है।
हिंदी में होता तो बाबूजी के लिए खरीद देता उन्हे अंग्रेजी तो आती नहीं इतना..।
Aane wala hai
@@Nationalist04 haa..kab..
Aa chuki hai Bhai. Lelo. Pitaji ko gift karo bada punya milega ❤
Ami Ganatra, explains our history so well that the listener is mesmerized
The ultimate destiny of Shri Rama is getting physically distant with her beloved Shri Sita maa...but the cords of their hearts are forever tied..The lesson i got from this episode is love is forever..it is not conditional...it is not physical...love is not that wheb you hold on to that person ...love is something that can't take any nonsense for the person you love....and that is bigger than everything and that makes RAma-sita a forever tale of love.
Meating eating wrong interpretation.. Hiran ke par khusbu wali i forgetting the name and same thing is used as medicine also..
चतुर्दश हि वर्षाणि वत्स्यामि विजने वने |
मधु मूल फलैः जीवन् हित्वा मुनिवद् आमिषम् || २-२०-२९
स ष्ट्चाअष्टौ च वर्षाणि वत्स्यामि विजने वने |
आसेवमानो वन्यानि फलमूलैश्च चर्तयन् || २-२०-३१
Vaad is standing out for its quality content among the folks of UA-cam channels.Wishes for all the success. Amiji ko bohot Sadhuwad👍
श्वेत वध भिष्म पितामह द्वारा नियम विरुद्ध किया
प्रतिदिन 10 हजार राजाओं का वध भी नियम विरुद्ध
इलावन का वध भी नियम विरुद्ध था
भिष्म द्वारा शस्त्र त्यागना उनकी गलती है
भगवान कृष्ण ने कभी कोई नियम नहीं तोड़ा
Jai Shree Ram 🙏
Jai Siya Ram mere bhai 😀
Jai Siya Ram🙏
Call me Grammar Demon but it's "नपुंसक" not "नपुसंक" 😋
is it possible to translate in native languages mostly in north east, south languages..
I dont believe that Rama & Sita would eat somebody's flesh.
Understandable!
I believe there is no authentic valmiki ramayan existing in modern day india or anywhere in the world and the reason being that the foreign invaders who burnt the universities whose libraries burnt for months to completely destroy the knowledge we had and what i feel and what my point is that the authentic Ramayan of Maharshi Valmiki and Authentic Mahabharat of Maharshi Ved Vyas got burnt into ashes and then these people's creative liberty versions spread in fame and that's what we learn :)
लेखक जितना कोमल ह्रदय होगा, वह अपनी लेखनी से मानवीय भावों को उतना ही ऊकेर सकता है, एमी जी आपकी कलम में जादू हैं ।
ये बात सरासर गलत है कि वे मांस खाते थे ।ये आप मनुस्मृति मैं पढ़ सकते है जो रामायण से भी पहले लिखी गई है । मांस खाने वाली अन्य जातियां थी जैसे राक्षस, दानव , असुर, कई आदिवासी जातियां । मनुष्य मांस का सेवन नही करते थे और महाज्ञानी राम और पांडव तो बिल्कुल नही। तजोड और जानकारी इकट्ठा कीजिये ।
It's sad that a distorted version has been preached and believed by the masses. Valmiki Ji's original version should have been propogated.
Ramanand Sagar showed Hanuman as a weird looking half human half monkey creature while he was vanar or forest dweller...
Historical time pe Logon ke Ideal life Styyle Standard Badalte rahte hain .
1950 me kya Live in Relationship 1% bhee Acceptable thee ?
Thank you sir for such content...plz sir do a podocast about british crimes committed on Indiam woman & children ...we know there economic & political exploytation but there crime are beyond that we must put light on that...
50:00 koi kshatriya ho chahe shudra ho agr ham sanatani hai to, non veg is not for us, ye kshatriya non-veg khane lge to ye justify ho gya ki non veg hi duism m kha skte hai?
Aur shree raam jo ki bi a kisi karan kisi chiti ko bhi haani na pahucha yen, wo apni bhukh aur sareer k bal k liye non veg khayenge, is there any sense in it. I don't think so
Ami I'm disagring with you on this topic.
I haven’t heard such clarity about our itihaas till now. Definitely buying your books
Ami ji, Shri Ram and Yudhishthir ji were not non-vegetarian. And the context you are quoting from mahabharat clearly states that they used to kill aggressive animals only not eat them. Also, in mahabharat bhishm ji has mentioned names of various kshatriyas like harishchandra who have never eated non-veg things.
So please correct.
Thanks
1:11:04 This is what I want to say about Ami ji after listening to her for 2 hours. 😄
Ha ha so true😄
Buddhism does not stop meat eating. It is Jainism that prohibits. In fact there are said to be instances of Buddha eating meat