This host is why i cant stand multiplayer in hoi. “The axis players are mad that youre winning the spanish civil war so you have to delete your units or stop playing”
@@busteraycan TBF that isn't actually in the rules, the issue is Dankus is a meta player in a group full of memers such as you know, bo, braun and drue... remember the anniversary game? where dankus played to the meta so much that he had more civs and mils thanks to puppets than the entire rest of the world combined?
>Stalingrand 1942 Host: "Uh Soviet Player, delete half your divisions on the Stalingrad tile and remove your Air Force from the region to give the Germany Player a chance."
@@Whatareyoudoinnhere Or D-Day, 1944 Host: uhhhh Germany you have to allow the Allies at least 5 beach landings with a port. And pull all your tanks out.
@@DimensionalWanderer yeah I have no clue either xD like everyone said, it was a France win and they continued playing simply for fun instead of killing the Axis' game
11:45 In retrospect. Something else that might have been possible would have been to delete the tank units and send them as lend-lease to another allied player which would then give it back to dankus later on
Hoi4 is such a cancerous game. If the allies are winning the axis cries. But if the axis is winning they shit talk the allies. It's why I stick to just private games
@@ayathados6629 Bruh, re-read the comment you replied to, and even if what you said was something proper, "it happens all the time" is not a good reason for people to be jerks simply for the allies existing
That they let Germany carry on was one thing - I'd argue part of the appeal of playing France is the prospect of playing the post-cap stage, and they did give Dankus the credit that he had already won, so I can see how you might fall on one side or the other of that issue. But if the host is just gonna screw over one side of the Spanish Civil War because they're winning, why even allow volunteers there in the first place!? Why not just pull up the console and cap everything for the Nationalists, if you're just gonna try and hand the Axis the win anyway?
Ive never watched this channel before, but that host’s stupid calls is exactly why I stopped playing HOI4. You plan ahead, you win, and someone has to throw a fit
Imagine youre playing soviets or USA and spend 1h with lobby sim and 2,5h with build up…and france caps Germany in 1939/40….and just like that your Game ends. Wouldnt you be pissed af if host didnt fixed this?
@@TraIMaTix Why would you play any nation other than Germany, US, or USSR if those are the only ones that the host will make have a real war that matters?
Yep but people reserve days to play this games, and they usually last for 6 hours, if you make it unplayable after 1h, its kinda fucked up so they have to fix it, this games are not played dayly
It's just literally to make sure that the US and Japan have a chance to do something other than play Atlas of 1936 for three hours. Some people want to win games in three hours, others want a good time.
I tried to play as an agressif France one time in a public lobby. The host was playing as Germany and wasn't very good at the game since he had almost no airforce in 1939. I managed to push him back to Munich but then I got banned for "cheating"
@Keeps agree. Italy is pretty hard to master in a multi and requires lot of attention. If you lose in africa then you're 99% done. The funniest MP i played was funny just because the italian players were great, not only they held a year and a half in Africa with little to no support from Germany, but then they retreated well and defended the balkans and italian peninsula on their own like fucking monster. I was playing as Hungary and the Soviet front was just as good, 4 players in the URSS among the best, they held like MFs and got crushed in early 1944 after terrible fights and after axis almost lost. The allies abandoned the italian invasion after unsuccesfully trying it for a year or so and landed in France and Netherlands they basically took benelux and france when we finslly capitulated URSS in the urals, got in the west and fought even harder. The frontline became massive and the game unplayable as there were thousands of divisions, we landed again in africa because the allies were trying to land all over germany and had a lot of fun but eventually we stopped playing because it was too laggy. That's what happens when there's good players in Key nations, the Italian main was most of the time giving everybody else in the axis instructions and it was so much fun. Such a great player
Serious question, has there ever been an event where a Germany that was about to lose to France would win barb? Fully agree the game was more fun for the others with the forced surrender, but what if they instead made it an early barb with France v Soviets ala Napoleon or whatever?
I think if something like France winning happens, there should be a contigency plan where people agree to do something ahistorical like Commintern versus Allies or something instead of telling a player that he should just give up.
I have 700 hours on hoi4 all in single player because the first time and if I am right the last one I played Italy and because the UK player just put crappy division in Africa I managed to reach the Suez canal, from Ethiopia I went north to unite the front at this point the host(USSR) stopped the game and he said that because they were playing an historical game Italy should not win in africa therefore I needed to retreat all the way to el Alamein and abadon Ethiopia. I said that's the dumbest shit I have heard just because Italy was incompetent in ww2 doesn't mean that you're forced to lose on hoi4. At this point I wanted to really quit the game but seeing me be at least decent and for the first time not against ai i didn't left. After that the UK player literally didn't put any division in Africa and when I managed to literally just walk in he again stopped the game and this time he asked me to delete all the infantry I had in Africa I said him that the UK player was exploiting this stupid rule by simply not putting any division and he said that was fair because he still maintain the historical territories. At this point almost all the players left and so I did. Don't know if the UK was his friend or just a complete noob after all it was a "noob only match"
Well shit, I've never played HoI4 MP, and from the looks of it I'm not missing much, things are so railroaded that if somehow, France manages to hold, the hosts force its player to capitulate... What's the use for a France player to prepare for the war then, if no matter what happens, Germany has to win ? And I get that it's done so that all the other players around the world can have something to do instead of sitting three hours then being told the game was won without them doing anything, but this sucks for everyone involved. Well, except whoever plays as Germany, since even if you lose, the hosts will give you the win Damn this sucks so bad, I can't imagine how unfun this has to be. All the pushing, defending, punishing of Germany's cockiness, all of this for the host to come down and be like ''Yeah well done Dankus, now delete these tanks that have beaten the Germans, and let them capitulate you, exactly as you would have if you had played badly... Germany is basically this little brother you'll race and will let win the race, so that he feels good about him
maybe if your going full hist. Also this germany kinda sucked lol, so whatever ig. But usually France will lose regardless but can make a lasting impact. Also most games are not historical but alt history/kinda do what you want mp. So for example french-german alliance going after a british-russia etc. All depends on the mp you are going for.
@@josefpanzer2774 in my games I tend to make it so that if a Germany loses to a France that player has a temp ban from Germany. Best he can play after that is a co-op. Sure it may ruin a game then and their but it’ll make this matter less consistent
It's only railroaded because this is historical comp MP. That's literally the whole point of a historical game, to be railroadey. There are plenty of fun non historical and loose historical servers to play on.
@@kyrozephyr8628 Why would anyone play as France then, or put any effort into it, if the sole point of your game is to get beaten up by Germany, no matter the actions either its player or you take ? If those who play into these games enjoy it, good for them though ! I just know I wouldn't like it, I like to try and do ''better'' or "different" than what actually happened, if I want to see WW2 happen I'll watch a documentary
couldn't agree more hope we see more unique stuff like this. I get tired of the same old german/russian tank spam. at least this time it was french tank spam
*breaking news!* a military Swedish General drugs addict somehow stop the advances of the germen army!! "but how?!!!" A young journalist asks, the famous General reply. "E.Z! Medium...T0NKS, Kappa!! also this" he was holding up an item that must be censored to protect the kids!!!! (the editor of this news article vomit a little bit because of censorship)
@@somedude8468 To be fair, if the Germany player is even more of a dogshit to the point he has to whine to the host because he can't beat fucking France with almost 3x as many mils and the various Germany buffs it's not that hard to be good. On the other hand I don't say that Dankus is a bad player, quite the opposite, he is surprisingly good but Bo's lobby is just on another level. Even Golden, who at a game for some odd reason decided to not make tank divisions when he had 30k tanks just lying around in storage and blamed Spain for not importing chromium, can easily cap France.
It's so weird seeing a massive tank battle in the north part of France, but there is no infantry on either side. Just a bunch of sweaty tank boys driving around.
Thomas, who already has an anti-Dankus bias, made the wrong call. The reality is, if Germany is unable to break France, they are to blame. France has such a disadvantage vs Germany due to all their debuffs that are hard to completely remove by 39, their industry is tiny compared to the Axis, especially in this meta where none of the Allies can help France except with air (which is, btw, non-historical, because Britain and it's colonies were there day 1). And if the Axis, who can send more Volunteers together than the USSR and France can, lose Spain, they suck. It sucks if you're Russia, Spain or Japan, and you watch Germany get rolled and the game is over, but there has to be a better way than taking a win away from a good France, because it just encourages people to put a bad player on France, or good players to not want to play France. If I was host, I'd have allowed stupid stuff to happen, like Berlin-Moscow Alliance, just to keep the game interesting.
I don’t think Moscow Berlin was possible mainly due to mod restrictions. However, I do agree that maybe an allied v axis game where the axis migrate between the two sides (mainly the minors) so they still get a game and nobody is getting fucked over
French Historically accurate B1-bis capable of clapping 1940 panzers at all time so long as it has perfect logistics as support: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA You serious?
@@ninjartist36 aside from outdated tactics which was true lol, they DID have radios in their tanks at least the newer ones it was just Radio's that were so bad the older alternztive was litteraly more efficient especially when older tanks didnt even have them. And Maginot line was true enough a big reason not to attack because who in their right mind would abandon such such a fortification when it was nearly unbreachable by frontal assault no matter what yoy threw at it
@@Freedmoon44 If they intervened in the Spanish civil war they might've been able to secure their south flank and also realise what the Germans were doing and would be able to build tanks even better than the panzers used
Cam someone explain why he had to leave Spain because the “axis wanted it” surely that defeats the point of having the combat, of course you have competing interests??
i dont play hoi4 mp, but isn't it worth going to partial mob via event? even if its only for 120 days and a loss of 50 pp. you still get 120 days of extra factories and quicker construction speed.
Wait wait, ok I have very little experience with Hoi4 Multiplayer. So I need to know.. They really make you stop and Delete units or cripple yourself if your doing too good? Like if Germany gets their asses kicked by France they'll make the French player delete units? And if they don't they kick the French player?
this is just bc its a private game - but its done because players playing countries like USA, Soviets, minors like NZ and Australia, dont get to do anything after playing building simulator for 3hours straight. its basically so everyone didnt build for 3 hours and the games over all because france is better than germany.
@@aydenfellerhoff3160 I mean if it's a private game then shouldn't they already know which players has what kind of Skills? I mean shit they placed one of the best Hoi4 Multiplayers on France and they weren't expecting a problem to come out of this? But even after that, why not just have the United States and the Soviet Union fight if they feel so upset that they just sat through the whole game building industry? Even before the game starts how about asking the players playing these countries their qualifications or if they're even good? Vet them or whatever and if they get their asses kicked in 38 for trying to take Czechoslovakia early then you kick them. Just seems pretty stupid to knee cap the player who's playing by the rules and doing it better than the others. And it's not like he hides his skill or what he does it a private game they know who he is but they still put him there and he would have beaten Germany if the Admin didn't step in because Germany cried.
@@g.r.senterprisevenatorclas7314 they dont "place" people on certain countries. people play what they want to play, and sometimes the new players want to have a go playing a major like germany or japan. the issue is when a good france player then dominates this new player, which is no fault of the new player (they are still learning the game) , it then just denies the rest of the axis, and the soviet union a game that they've just spent 3 hours building up for. your mindset is why hoi4 is such a difficult game to get into multiplayer wise because new players never get a chance to learn how to play countries like germany in multiplayer settings.
@@aydenfellerhoff3160 I can agree with giving the new player more experience with majors. So then why not change the game to make it more interesting? I saw some great comments about forming a Berlin-moscow axis or at the bare minimum let the Germany player have a funny endsieg. Even historically the German victory in france was a miracle of sorts, and so it makes sense for a German player to fail sometimes.
France is so ‘op’ so to say, I held against the best player in the discord server until 40 and do 1m casualties on them, and they said I had to delete all my units if I reached 41, but the thing is. This was a ‘strict’ historical rule set, but for some reason, they alowed an early war, and Spain to be in the axis, or sucked, but it was foony
germany gets wrecked super early in spain , then screws himself over in france and wehraboo host angy that axis lose, but if allies lost then he'd be trashtalking them
"We finally breached against Frankreich and into paris Hans" "Warten do you hear that Friedrich?" "Nien? Was ist es?" "I hear La Marseillaise" * 8 french Medium tanks shows up* "Oh Scheiße"
Honestly I woulda just said lolno if the host asked me to delete my units. (Either of the 2 times). Like, he can ban you if he wants, just proves you won.
Who even cares if nationalist Spain loses. All they’ll do if they’re an AI is send a few volunteers and just sit around the entire game. Unless the Soviets manage to puppet them with their focus (which I doubt they have in their mod) who cares who wins?
Bro, I was about to pull my hair of my head. Wtf is this sorry ass attempt for "Axis biased" game? You got outmaneuvered and outplayed; you're out. Jesus dude, just because you play Germany doesn't mean you're the center of the game. If you can't beat a bloody France then what the hell of a gameplay treatment you think you're entitled too?
They counted as an axis loss, but kept playing so it was actually fun for more people than just dankus. US, USSR, Japan, UK, Hungary, Romania, Canada, Mexico, South Africa, and Australian players hadn't done anything yet, so they just played for fun.
I want to see Dankue go for the new strat with the DLC. Tactical bombers and just destroy the enemy supply. Better yet is if you can paradrop in the game then cap the supply ports.
I so so hate this. If you win you win. Why bother fighting if you're not allowed to win anyway. You might as well build all your factories in africa and go full scorched earth then. You could just like transfer to another scenario or something. Like if france hold say Germany and the soviets have to go Berlin-Moscow axis with italy joining the allies or something. Similar thing with Spain, If axis lose Spain gets to go to the allies or cominterm but axis gets a player turkey or sweden or something.
Mod is linked in description before you ask
Thx drankus :)
Where is mod
where's the mega campaign dommy
wait wrong channel
Nice
so where mod
This is like beating the boss battle you're supposed to lose, but the game decides you lose anyway in the next cutscene.
The intro sekiro boss haha
Demon souls
Fucking hate that shit. Or a boss battle that you cannot win, but try to win anyway, and use up all your potions and such.
newest i remember is the big lycan boss battle in the beggining of re8
I get some gta story mode flashbacks, surrendering to two cops holding you at gun point when you've been through a lot worse
This host is why i cant stand multiplayer in hoi. “The axis players are mad that youre winning the spanish civil war so you have to delete your units or stop playing”
It has no sense, if you loose then learn from it and dont cry
@@agustinsaya6459 its hoi4 soy boys
To be fair, dankus also kinda bended the rules a bit to send 5 divs to spain.
@@busteraycan TBF that isn't actually in the rules, the issue is Dankus is a meta player in a group full of memers such as you know, bo, braun and drue... remember the anniversary game? where dankus played to the meta so much that he had more civs and mils thanks to puppets than the entire rest of the world combined?
@@CafeLiquerstreams what was that video called please ? :)
>Stalingrand 1942
Host: "Uh Soviet Player, delete half your divisions on the Stalingrad tile and remove your Air Force from the region to give the Germany Player a chance."
Soviet Player: OK *Uses excess supply to convert to 40 width division infantry and replaces plane production with anti-air*
@@thedemonofrazgriz3602 Host: Retreat your units from the tile
@@IslandWork1 Soviet player: OK *Nukes tile*
@@Whatareyoudoinnhere Or D-Day, 1944
Host: uhhhh Germany you have to allow the Allies at least 5 beach landings with a port. And pull all your tanks out.
@@danielw.8356Nah, that wouldnt happen, hoi4 hosts love german moustache man too much
"WAH WAH, France defeated us because we suck, we weren't prepared, WAH WAH." That's what I heard when Dancus defeated them in 39.
Fr Germany just throw a tantrum
Well they did admit defeat though
@@cedricl.marquard6273 and then he was forced to delete his tanks and let germany take france? lmao what
@@theslavicimmigrant4795 yeah so the sovs n all still have a game, but the winner is dankus, or allies, thanks to france lul
Exactly
Buff doge Dankus: I could as France during 1939.
Wimy doge Dankus: Throws Finland by zooming in on the Frontline and then Romania by ultra snaking.
Did Dankus already upload his version of events?
@@stan2754 no but thought it would be funny considering how he made germany rage quit but in the other game did worse than golden.
@@the-wanderer111 everybody has their days I guess
If you wanna see this from bo’s pov it is Worst Uk ever 2.0.
Hey. France is beating us in Spain. Let's make God delete his units.
Hey. France beat us in the war proper. Let's make God delete his tanks.
Yeah, that felt like serious BM to force the France player to cripple himself in Spain
You know the saying. "Gott Mitt Uns".
Watched this live; So hilarious watching Germany instantly rage-quit after getting dunked on in the Benelux
Tfw Dankus is winning so then the host is like, "Nah you cant do that"
Yeah host shit
This community is soooo soft. Back in 17 france would have been the one to barb if france beat germany
Exactly.
How is this soft? France literally won, they just kept playing afterwards so everyone else could have fun.
@@DimensionalWanderer yeah I have no clue either xD like everyone said, it was a France win and they continued playing simply for fun instead of killing the Axis' game
@@gamerin4d git gud.
i love how sound like boomers talking about the 2017 like it was the 70s and the good old times
11:45 In retrospect. Something else that might have been possible would have been to delete the tank units and send them as lend-lease to another allied player which would then give it back to dankus later on
He had to delete his stockpile so lendleasing would not be allowed
@@jordangames2560 As I understood this was so that the Germans wouldn't get it after capitulating him
No one would have had the convoys to ship then back and forth in a timely manner. He had to many tanks
Or GER player could have not be bad and not throw a tantrum like a litteral child after loosing
Hoi4 is such a cancerous game. If the allies are winning the axis cries. But if the axis is winning they shit talk the allies. It's why I stick to just private games
This is literally every online game, either get thicker skin and learn to take insults in the chin, or cope
@@ayathados6629 not an argument
@@ayathados6629 do u english
@@ayathados6629 Bruh, re-read the comment you replied to, and even if what you said was something proper, "it happens all the time" is not a good reason for people to be jerks simply for the allies existing
İ guess that’s kinda historically accurate considering the axis nations considered themselves racially superior.
That they let Germany carry on was one thing - I'd argue part of the appeal of playing France is the prospect of playing the post-cap stage, and they did give Dankus the credit that he had already won, so I can see how you might fall on one side or the other of that issue. But if the host is just gonna screw over one side of the Spanish Civil War because they're winning, why even allow volunteers there in the first place!? Why not just pull up the console and cap everything for the Nationalists, if you're just gonna try and hand the Axis the win anyway?
Gotta farm generals there
Spanish civil war isn't about winning for republicans, it's for exp, and cucking the nationalists
@@thaimapping And i can farm your mom
Ive never watched this channel before, but that host’s stupid calls is exactly why I stopped playing HOI4. You plan ahead, you win, and someone has to throw a fit
Yeah it makes the whole thing pointless as the host just decides who wins anyway
Imagine youre playing soviets or USA and spend 1h with lobby sim and 2,5h with build up…and france caps Germany in 1939/40….and just like that your Game ends. Wouldnt you be pissed af if host didnt fixed this?
@@TraIMaTix Well not much point playing france then is there.
@@TraIMaTix Just go to war with France then lmao
@@TraIMaTix Why would you play any nation other than Germany, US, or USSR if those are the only ones that the host will make have a real war that matters?
Love how the axis player sees something to his disadvantage and says to host:make him stop 😂
Get these kids out of here
I have never heard of such idiocy as being forced to delete units and stockpiles. Playing against people the idea is you win or lose.
Yep but people reserve days to play this games, and they usually last for 6 hours, if you make it unplayable after 1h, its kinda fucked up so they have to fix it, this games are not played dayly
@@sukoner1 that sounds like a skill issue
@@sukoner1 just play better then
@@sukoner1 then resign and start a new game? Or don't play against someone that's on another league.
At any rate this is baby shit
@@sukoner1 If you can't handle players outplaying you, stick to single player.
What is this cringe decision making by hosts? People playing good literally getting put back because shit players.
yeah i don't get it. Fucking troll host amirite?
Wehrbs are assmad that they can't steamroll everyone. Most rule sets are designed to make the game easier for Germany.
It's just literally to make sure that the US and Japan have a chance to do something other than play Atlas of 1936 for three hours.
Some people want to win games in three hours, others want a good time.
half the lobby spent 3 hours prepping for the game I think its fair to adjust the balance so that everyone at least gets some gameplay
Sam Purchase than just go ahistorical, moscow-berlin axis or something but not cuck wehrbs rulebending.
I tried to play as an agressif France one time in a public lobby. The host was playing as Germany and wasn't very good at the game since he had almost no airforce in 1939. I managed to push him back to Munich but then I got banned for "cheating"
When you destroy them so hard that they have to give you a separate win so everyone else can play...
Nothing makes me happier than a really good France game, a really good Italy game is second, just because France has it ever so slightly harder.
Italy is easy to defend as long as you fortify Sicily and Southern Italy. The North is literally a natural fortress
@Keeps agree. Italy is pretty hard to master in a multi and requires lot of attention. If you lose in africa then you're 99% done. The funniest MP i played was funny just because the italian players were great, not only they held a year and a half in Africa with little to no support from Germany, but then they retreated well and defended the balkans and italian peninsula on their own like fucking monster. I was playing as Hungary and the Soviet front was just as good, 4 players in the URSS among the best, they held like MFs and got crushed in early 1944 after terrible fights and after axis almost lost. The allies abandoned the italian invasion after unsuccesfully trying it for a year or so and landed in France and Netherlands they basically took benelux and france when we finslly capitulated URSS in the urals, got in the west and fought even harder. The frontline became massive and the game unplayable as there were thousands of divisions, we landed again in africa because the allies were trying to land all over germany and had a lot of fun but eventually we stopped playing because it was too laggy. That's what happens when there's good players in Key nations, the Italian main was most of the time giving everybody else in the axis instructions and it was so much fun. Such a great player
Dankus, remember. You won before the Germans even invaded. Don’t let this German orientated simp game ruin your fun
Dankus be like: suffering from success
Edit: LENIN COME LOOK IM FAMOUS
I love you mr stalin
You called?
@@vladimirlenin462 mr lenin is here too 🥵
Reddit moment
Oh fuck. It’s a party in here now. Where the Trosky boy at?
Someone get that germany player a participation trophy.
POV: someone doesn't immediately give up on mainland france
>”Mongolia goto Finland!”
LMFAO, Finno-ugric moment.
the host may have intervened to save germany's ass but he can't beat the feeling of getting 39'd by the French Republic
T A N K U S M E M E C U S
Serious question, has there ever been an event where a Germany that was about to lose to France would win barb? Fully agree the game was more fun for the others with the forced surrender, but what if they instead made it an early barb with France v Soviets ala Napoleon or whatever?
I think if something like France winning happens, there should be a contigency plan where people agree to do something ahistorical like Commintern versus Allies or something instead of telling a player that he should just give up.
"B-but its a WW2 game not a cold war one France is supposed to surrender to Germany else nothing can stop the allies"
Git gud!
yup,or maybe berlin-moscow axis
@@Freedmoon44 so it's scripted. so france always loses its main land
@@MarkIsTiredAlways i mean considering the french AI itself is scripted to always lose by making stupid stuffs to help the ennemy ofc its scripted
In the server I played in we usually let France hold cause it was funny and sometimes shows who is an incompetent germsny
The host is why no one plays HOI4 MP public lobbies anymore.
I'm getting back into hoi4 after a while, is there anywhere I can go for private games?
@@moekitsune I would try the HOI4 Road to 56 roleplay server. They do a lot of HOI4 stuff in there and the people who are dicks get banned usually.
"we cant! its too much! its too much winning!" and im gunna say "no we need more we gotta win more"
I have 700 hours on hoi4 all in single player because the first time and if I am right the last one I played Italy and because the UK player just put crappy division in Africa I managed to reach the Suez canal, from Ethiopia I went north to unite the front at this point the host(USSR) stopped the game and he said that because they were playing an historical game Italy should not win in africa therefore I needed to retreat all the way to el Alamein and abadon Ethiopia. I said that's the dumbest shit I have heard just because Italy was incompetent in ww2 doesn't mean that you're forced to lose on hoi4. At this point I wanted to really quit the game but seeing me be at least decent and for the first time not against ai i didn't left. After that the UK player literally didn't put any division in Africa and when I managed to literally just walk in he again stopped the game and this time he asked me to delete all the infantry I had in Africa I said him that the UK player was exploiting this stupid rule by simply not putting any division and he said that was fair because he still maintain the historical territories. At this point almost all the players left and so I did. Don't know if the UK was his friend or just a complete noob after all it was a "noob only match"
Most HOI Players are not the brightest. The more hours they have in HOI MP worse they become.
Bruh. I don't think the host understands what historical means in HOI4 MP.
Came back from school and a new video im about to enjoy this so much lul
Well shit, I've never played HoI4 MP, and from the looks of it I'm not missing much, things are so railroaded that if somehow, France manages to hold, the hosts force its player to capitulate... What's the use for a France player to prepare for the war then, if no matter what happens, Germany has to win ? And I get that it's done so that all the other players around the world can have something to do instead of sitting three hours then being told the game was won without them doing anything, but this sucks for everyone involved.
Well, except whoever plays as Germany, since even if you lose, the hosts will give you the win
Damn this sucks so bad, I can't imagine how unfun this has to be. All the pushing, defending, punishing of Germany's cockiness, all of this for the host to come down and be like ''Yeah well done Dankus, now delete these tanks that have beaten the Germans, and let them capitulate you, exactly as you would have if you had played badly... Germany is basically this little brother you'll race and will let win the race, so that he feels good about him
Hmm I see kneecaps to be taken it seems the host is in my visions
maybe if your going full hist. Also this germany kinda sucked lol, so whatever ig. But usually France will lose regardless but can make a lasting impact. Also most games are not historical but alt history/kinda do what you want mp. So for example french-german alliance going after a british-russia etc. All depends on the mp you are going for.
@@josefpanzer2774 in my games I tend to make it so that if a Germany loses to a France that player has a temp ban from Germany. Best he can play after that is a co-op. Sure it may ruin a game then and their but it’ll make this matter less consistent
It's only railroaded because this is historical comp MP. That's literally the whole point of a historical game, to be railroadey. There are plenty of fun non historical and loose historical servers to play on.
@@kyrozephyr8628 Why would anyone play as France then, or put any effort into it, if the sole point of your game is to get beaten up by Germany, no matter the actions either its player or you take ?
If those who play into these games enjoy it, good for them though ! I just know I wouldn't like it, I like to try and do ''better'' or "different" than what actually happened, if I want to see WW2 happen I'll watch a documentary
Dankus got a based music taste
dont think hes choosing the music. i assume its the editor
@@aaliyahhughes5347 i think the songs in the beginning were from stream tho
@@aaliyahhughes5347 its the stream music and its his own taste
My feel when most the comments and this video is just reinforcing my point on banning meta players.
These players probably never played with random people on a public lobby.
Lmao, go beat Golden (even worse player) and make another episode out of it. What a joke
Why not just have meta players be minor countries?
@@Glamerth they tried it, Dankus gameruined two minors in one game.
im confused
This community is so soft man.
So this was the game that Bo was talking about.
I can see why he did newbies on majors. Meta players in the bo games are probably not the best.
Could you send a link to the video where he says that I'm intrested c;
@@yeetusdeletus8489 I watched it on his stream live tbh I wouldn't know how to find it
I am not that savvy on the internet lol
@@tylerhutson4687 well thats sad but thanks
Legit never seen this before in a competitive game. Really fun!
couldn't agree more hope we see more unique stuff like this. I get tired of the same old german/russian tank spam. at least this time it was french tank spam
*breaking news!* a military Swedish General drugs addict somehow stop the advances of the germen army!! "but how?!!!" A young journalist asks, the famous General reply. "E.Z! Medium...T0NKS, Kappa!! also this" he was holding up an item that must be censored to protect the kids!!!! (the editor of this news article vomit a little bit because of censorship)
Idk why but its so funny how he always swears in german
isn't it swedish?
@@bernardosales1044 no
@@bernardosales1044 trust me, Im a native german speaker, I should know
@@arkd0n276 Ah k, I get confused by german and swedish sometimes cause they sound so similar to me
he is almost fluent in german if i recall
"This Little Manouver is what i call E-sports"
how cane he do this well but then fuck up both finland and romania in just 1 BO game?
Because it's Bo lol
@@thedemonofrazgriz3602 ??? i mean his inconsistency in being a very good player and utter dogshit
@@somedude8468 To be fair, if the Germany player is even more of a dogshit to the point he has to whine to the host because he can't beat fucking France with almost 3x as many mils and the various Germany buffs it's not that hard to be good. On the other hand I don't say that Dankus is a bad player, quite the opposite, he is surprisingly good but Bo's lobby is just on another level. Even Golden, who at a game for some odd reason decided to not make tank divisions when he had 30k tanks just lying around in storage and blamed Spain for not importing chromium, can easily cap France.
@@suspecm6316 yup, surprised it wasnt golden the one playing against dankus this time LOL
France stronk
This live was some of the funniest hoi4 content ive ever seen
This is a certified Dankus classic
germany angery
When your so good you gotta handicap yourself and let yourself be capped
0:40 when you did so much crack that your resources panel cracked
Dankus could play Guatemala and still have a massive tank army
Never another random on Germany
I would have loved to see this France build finish off Germany and take on the USSR.
Swedish man atacked by resource bar
De Gaulle * have real tank division *
De Gaulle: ah ah encerclement go brrrrr
It's so weird seeing a massive tank battle in the north part of France, but there is no infantry on either side. Just a bunch of sweaty tank boys driving around.
Thomas, who already has an anti-Dankus bias, made the wrong call. The reality is, if Germany is unable to break France, they are to blame. France has such a disadvantage vs Germany due to all their debuffs that are hard to completely remove by 39, their industry is tiny compared to the Axis, especially in this meta where none of the Allies can help France except with air (which is, btw, non-historical, because Britain and it's colonies were there day 1).
And if the Axis, who can send more Volunteers together than the USSR and France can, lose Spain, they suck.
It sucks if you're Russia, Spain or Japan, and you watch Germany get rolled and the game is over, but there has to be a better way than taking a win away from a good France, because it just encourages people to put a bad player on France, or good players to not want to play France.
If I was host, I'd have allowed stupid stuff to happen, like Berlin-Moscow Alliance, just to keep the game interesting.
I don’t think Moscow Berlin was possible mainly due to mod restrictions. However, I do agree that maybe an allied v axis game where the axis migrate between the two sides (mainly the minors) so they still get a game and nobody is getting fucked over
That host is probs a wehraboo
ngl this is more interesting than geography
Why does he lose when he's winning? Does the multiplayer host make him lose?
Yeah, the host made Dankus delete divisions because he was losing lol
Host: NOOOOOOO! French tanks can't beat Panzers!
German engineering is superior!
Dak: HA HA Medium tanks go brrrrrrrr
French Historically accurate B1-bis capable of clapping 1940 panzers at all time so long as it has perfect logistics as support: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA You serious?
@@Freedmoon44 the problem with France at that time was outdated tactics, didn't have radios in their tanks and the maginot line
@@ninjartist36 aside from outdated tactics which was true lol, they DID have radios in their tanks at least the newer ones it was just Radio's that were so bad the older alternztive was litteraly more efficient especially when older tanks didnt even have them. And Maginot line was true enough a big reason not to attack because who in their right mind would abandon such such a fortification when it was nearly unbreachable by frontal assault no matter what yoy threw at it
@@Freedmoon44 If they intervened in the Spanish civil war they might've been able to secure their south flank and also realise what the Germans were doing and would be able to build tanks even better than the panzers used
Thomas wtf lmao
Bro I'm not even playing the game, yet I'm still mad at that host.
Can anyone tell me the name of the song at 3:58?
Imagine having to tie your hands behind your back just to play in a mp match
Hoi4 is the only strategy game where you get kicked for using strategy lol.
Good Video as Always. But what is this song at the beginning? I am literally to stupid to find out
He’s just too good
Ghost Division but the French are actually competent
Rommel: *Gets severely mulched and his Division becomes a ghost*
4:32 that radio for artillery, infantry, tanks... those tech trees are a part of mod or from DLC?
part of the mod
GG bro but i wonder WTF was that Germany player ?! He literally was throwing the entire game under the bug LMAO
new dankus post let's go
Thanks Dankus very cool
"hey the crybabies want me to nerf you and I'm going to because I am a bitch"
Personally loving the Macky Gee in the background
Cam someone explain why he had to leave Spain because the “axis wanted it” surely that defeats the point of having the combat, of course you have competing interests??
Ok
i dont play hoi4 mp, but isn't it worth going to partial mob via event? even if its only for 120 days and a loss of 50 pp. you still get 120 days of extra factories and quicker construction speed.
whats even the point of playing if a host comes in and tells you to lose when you start to win
Alternate title: What if the Sarrland offensive was successful?
Dankus is Frances Charles de Gaules
Wait wait, ok I have very little experience with Hoi4 Multiplayer. So I need to know..
They really make you stop and Delete units or cripple yourself if your doing too good?
Like if Germany gets their asses kicked by France they'll make the French player delete units? And if they don't they kick the French player?
Yes and they usually do the same to china
this is just bc its a private game - but its done because players playing countries like USA, Soviets, minors like NZ and Australia, dont get to do anything after playing building simulator for 3hours straight. its basically so everyone didnt build for 3 hours and the games over all because france is better than germany.
@@aydenfellerhoff3160 I mean if it's a private game then shouldn't they already know which players has what kind of Skills?
I mean shit they placed one of the best Hoi4 Multiplayers on France and they weren't expecting a problem to come out of this?
But even after that, why not just have the United States and the Soviet Union fight if they feel so upset that they just sat through the whole game building industry?
Even before the game starts how about asking the players playing these countries their qualifications or if they're even good? Vet them or whatever and if they get their asses kicked in 38 for trying to take Czechoslovakia early then you kick them.
Just seems pretty stupid to knee cap the player who's playing by the rules and doing it better than the others. And it's not like he hides his skill or what he does it a private game they know who he is but they still put him there and he would have beaten Germany if the Admin didn't step in because Germany cried.
@@g.r.senterprisevenatorclas7314 they dont "place" people on certain countries. people play what they want to play, and sometimes the new players want to have a go playing a major like germany or japan. the issue is when a good france player then dominates this new player, which is no fault of the new player (they are still learning the game) , it then just denies the rest of the axis, and the soviet union a game that they've just spent 3 hours building up for. your mindset is why hoi4 is such a difficult game to get into multiplayer wise because new players never get a chance to learn how to play countries like germany in multiplayer settings.
@@aydenfellerhoff3160 I can agree with giving the new player more experience with majors. So then why not change the game to make it more interesting? I saw some great comments about forming a Berlin-moscow axis or at the bare minimum let the Germany player have a funny endsieg. Even historically the German victory in france was a miracle of sorts, and so it makes sense for a German player to fail sometimes.
If Germany gets capped by France then the host should arrange a western democracies vs Comintern war.
France is so ‘op’ so to say, I held against the best player in the discord server until 40 and do 1m casualties on them, and they said I had to delete all my units if I reached 41, but the thing is. This was a ‘strict’ historical rule set, but for some reason, they alowed an early war, and Spain to be in the axis, or sucked, but it was foony
7:27 "Belgium is pu🦅🦅ing them"
1:20 Night of Nights POG
Fox stevenson at the start is a vibe
germany gets wrecked super early in spain , then screws himself over in france and wehraboo host angy that axis lose, but if allies lost then he'd be trashtalking them
Axis really lost 3 games in 1
"We finally breached against Frankreich and into paris Hans" "Warten do you hear that Friedrich?" "Nien? Was ist es?" "I hear La Marseillaise" * 8 french Medium tanks shows up* "Oh Scheiße"
that was a bullshit call, this dude didn't account for your volunteers that's on him. All is fair in love and war.
can anyone tell me the name of the song in the background of 17:00
5:40 based Blue Monday Enjoyer
Honestly I woulda just said lolno if the host asked me to delete my units. (Either of the 2 times). Like, he can ban you if he wants, just proves you won.
Who even cares if nationalist Spain loses. All they’ll do if they’re an AI is send a few volunteers and just sit around the entire game. Unless the Soviets manage to puppet them with their focus (which I doubt they have in their mod) who cares who wins?
Bro, I was about to pull my hair of my head. Wtf is this sorry ass attempt for "Axis biased" game? You got outmaneuvered and outplayed; you're out. Jesus dude, just because you play Germany doesn't mean you're the center of the game. If you can't beat a bloody France then what the hell of a gameplay treatment you think you're entitled too?
They counted as an axis loss, but kept playing so it was actually fun for more people than just dankus. US, USSR, Japan, UK, Hungary, Romania, Canada, Mexico, South Africa, and Australian players hadn't done anything yet, so they just played for fun.
whats the song at the beginning?
FRANCIA STANDS! VIVE L'EMPEREUR!
No child left behind but hoi4 edition
I want to see Dankue go for the new strat with the DLC. Tactical bombers and just destroy the enemy supply. Better yet is if you can paradrop in the game then cap the supply ports.
I so so hate this.
If you win you win. Why bother fighting if you're not allowed to win anyway. You might as well build all your factories in africa and go full scorched earth then.
You could just like transfer to another scenario or something.
Like if france hold say Germany and the soviets have to go Berlin-Moscow axis with italy joining the allies or something.
Similar thing with Spain, If axis lose Spain gets to go to the allies or cominterm but axis gets a player turkey or sweden or something.