Carrier rocket developed by German start-up due for take-off next year | DW Business
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 кві 2021
- With the space industry growing rapidly, private sector satellites will soon be crowding up the orbit.
A carrier rocket developed by Munich-based start-up Isar Aerospace is due for take-off next year. Developers hope it will be the first of many launches.
Subscribe: ua-cam.com/users/deutsche...
For more news go to: www.dw.com/en/
Follow DW on social media:
►Facebook: / deutschewellenews
►Twitter: / dwnews
►Instagram: / dwnews
Für Videos in deutscher Sprache besuchen Sie: / dwdeutsch
#space #satellites #IsarAerospace - Наука та технологія
It sounds more like they are competing with RocketLab rather than with SpaceX given the market they are targetting
The journalists not knowing the difference should tell us about the quality of this report.
Yes, Rocket lab is more a competitor, the rockets are more made for cube sats.
@Emrys Probably they haven't even heard from Rocket Lab. German Media has only a limited range of view (no worldwide), it typically ends at the horizon and NZ is far behind the horizon ;-)
Also the comparison is a little bit strange, a comparison between Space X (with launchers in the Ariane 5 class and beyond) to small rockets for cube sats, isn't really realistic, more like a comparison between Boeing or Airbus and Cessna
@@simonm1447 The last time I heard any mention of Rocketlab by any non NZ TV news channels was in 2018
@@robertsutton8894 - Rocket Lab is an American company, technically. You hear about it quite a bit in the USA.
Germans build rockets
London: *visible sweating*
''I aim for the stars but keep hitting London''
@Treavor Martin it was just a joke, because of other rockets Germany launched in the past
@Treavor Martin they do but it was a joke, they say Brits have a sense of humour, lol
Well, Britain is building at least three rockets of their own.
German's V2 rocket was the first rocket to reach outer space.
Hope they will catch up with the big powers soon.
V2 was sub orbital.
Ok, and China invented compass and gunpower.
No one cares about past, do something now
@peter jones
American morals are a joke?! Big news!
@@abdiganiaden exactly
@peter jones US won the space race, not Germany. Germany did not do anything. LOL.
I should love to see in my lifetime Vernher Von Braun’s dream of a rotating large space station hotel for tourists just like the one in the film 2001 A Space Odyssey.
first you should love to learn spelling von Brauns name correctly.
It will be nice to see some new companies from other countries in space
@Galactic Federation Wait, are they planning to dig into the moon or did you intend to express "on the moon"?
@@aoelp On
@Galactic Federation Lol, how exactly does he plan to do that? Throw them up there himself?
Mom germany is testing another V2 rocket!!! Lol
😬😬😭 lmaoooooooo
Too Soon
🙄🤫🤫🤫🤫🤫🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Uh oh
@@youknowitzg00d its been 77 years bro
Too many government imposed hurdles for start ups. Not easy for a European company to compete
Such as?
@@calvinsylveste8474 High taxes most likely and lack of funding from the Govt.
@@arifmahmud8844 yes that’s a problem to but taxes for startups are not that bad what is worse than everything is how long it taces to create a company in Germany. Up to 70 Days is nothing unusual wich is 90% longer than in other Eu countries. And that’s only on problem
@@arifmahmud8844
You do realize taxes are on profit the start ups might make in the future, it's usually years before they turn a profit.
You do realize where govt gets money to fund stuff, from taxes.
Especially with the hard and already established competition like Rocket Lab.
I wish Isar Aerospace the best luck.
Would love to see what they can accomplish.
There are a large number of startups trying to build rockets for launching small satellites, and RocketLab is already serving that market pretty well. So, it’s not necessarily going to be easy for a new small-sat launcher to find a market.
But like any capitalist, I LOVE COMPETITION!!
bavaria: AHA! hahahahaha.... oktoberfest!!!
Medic!!!
Bvaria one is the new way! hahaha
So a German version of RocketLab.. who are already working on reuse of their first stage and a medium sized man rated launcher..
Exactly, Rocketlab is just the most advanced of the small satellites launcher companies, there’s others coming up. This German company simply has to get in line. SpaceX is, of course, way ahead.
The question is, can RocketLab compete against Space X? Will the cost of launching Starship be even cheaper than RocketLab's new launch vehicle which aims to only reuse the first stage like Dragon does. Starship also aims to be able to relaunched multiple times a day like an airliner.
@@asjeot I see Neutron competing with F9 in a few years, since they'll be basically in the same class. And IMHO that vehicle has really a great growth potential. IDK how long does SpaceX plan to keep F9 around, but it should keep an eye on Neutron.
P.S. yes but if you need many launches with different orbital inclinations a single Starship launch won't do it.
And IDK what Starship's actual crossrange capability is going to be, so the number of times it will be able to launch each day (even assuming zero refurbishment & inspections) is limited.
@@maxklinger1494 I thought Elon has mentioned that Starship will eventually replace Falcon 9 altogether as the launch cost of Starship will make Falcon 9 redundant. Wonder if Starship can launch kick stages to get satellites to their designated orbits and wonder how orbital refuelling will change the game. Definitely interesting times.
@@ismailnyeyusof3520 well i wouldnt say WAY ahead.. we are talking about germans here..
London will be used to calibrate the new german rockets, prior to actual space flight.
That worked well before
hahshashhashhahshahsh Just as I thougth
I remember the Sanger 2 with a winged ramjet carrier vehicle and a winged rocket powered shuttle being promoted at a NASA conference I attended in 1985. Next door was the scramjet X-31 and I became convinced that the two part space plane alternative the Germans proposed represented the alternative that could affordably be built with the then current tech. Such a pity it wasn't built.
What exactly were Europeans doing during the past three decades? You did not have wars, you did not have economic crisis, yet you were sinking faster than anyone.
there building a launch site in the UK also i think this is great more companies doing stuff in space
YEAH Deutschland to the MOON! 🚀
You do know that this rocket will never make it anywhere near the moon, right?
They are already there. Iron sky says so..
@@arhansolo8725 lol
But I still wish good luck and fortune to anyone investing in SPACE!
@@arhansolo8725 zu wyld
Would love to be a software developer on this team.
Von Braun would be so proud.
Germany had world's first space startup but Germany didn't help them and raised many hurdles.
They help send some to London...
Germany being Germany 😐
They were taken over by the United States for their know-how.
Germany had the first rocket in space, but its rocket startup suddenly came to an end: World war 2 was over
What hurdles are you talking about?
Germany joined the chat 😁🇩🇪
Germany started the chat
It's nice to see the EU flag with the German one side by side.
@peter jones sick burn! 🤣🤣🤣
And also the Bavarian flag I think, although I am not German, so I may be wrong.
@@regolith1350 Are you 5yrs old? Come on.
Pretty normal. Bavaria is a bit special in that sense since like Texas we take a bit more pride in our flaga as other states do. You will see Texas flags everywhere in McGregor, Tx at SpaceXes Test site. Bavarians usually see themselves as Bavarians, Germans, Europeans in that order.
@@meamzcs since German is a state of the EU, comparing Texas makes no sense. US/EU Texas/Germany. But I understand your point.
Instead of comparing it to spacex compare it first to electron rockets. They have the same beliefs on market. SpaceX doesn't care that much on satellites but use profit from there to get to mars
True, although the average audience is still more familiar with Space X than Rocket Labs. Technically they are not wrong either, both are private companies who try to send payloads at the lower price to space.
True, space x has only one goal mars everything else is to just support the cost it cause to them.
@@jitendratiwari6886 That's not entirely correct, yes their biggest goal is Mars but that's not their only goal. Their goal is to make humans multi-planetary species.
When they finally reach mars I wouldn't expect them to stop and I can bet that they will push humans forward into space. Elon wants Moonbase to be a reality as much as everyone else because it means that we can push even further into space.
i invested in rocketlab (VACQ), they are already operational getting toward reusability. So at least 5 years ahead of them, maybe 10.
Rocketlab is heading to a dead end. Their launch service is too expansive per kilo. I guess the future survivors in the rocket industry have to use the cheap steels to make their rocket and burning methane.
@@zhchbob SpaceX is much cheaper per kg, but Rocket Lab has a MUCH lower minimum order quantity and can hurl it into a precise orbit.
It surprises me that people aren’t ride sharing more (how many desirable orbits can they be?), but ... looks like people want it.
@@sparschaler3536 > and can hurl it into a precise orbit.
As opposed to other launch providers, whose orbits are all out of the whack? Phlease...
I'm a huge fan of SpaceX and Elon, but as a strong believer in Europe, seeing the EU flag nearly made me cry
ISRO🇮🇳 already has SLV & proven it's stellar record in delivering satellites to orbit from many years.
ISRO is a government agency, this news talks about private company.
@@1ndragunawan this news is more about tapping the market of small payload launching.
I really hope humanity stands together as one during this space journey we take on. It’s the only way we reach our goal as becoming a multi planetary species
Are those single use rockets?
Currently yea, but they said they are open-minded about making it reusable someday.
SpaceX also started with an expendable launcher.
Respect for the land of V2s and Werner von braun
Good thing! We really need alternatives. We cannot have hegemonies, cause we have them too many already.
Hope this suceeds.
Day is not far behind when we will see space flights similar to humans nowadays taking a plane to travel. Exciting days ahead in space flight, welcome aboard Germany.
Gotta love competition.
Its a great motivator for progress.
It makes me happy to live in the time of the next technological revolutions.
The Saturn V is considered the most efficient rocket in history, between 1967 and 1973 it flew 13 times for the Apollo programs, 10 flights with astronauts and the Skylab Space Laboratory, without exploding. Without taking into account the developments since 1962 of the Saturn family, which were very successful. A total of 32 Saturns of all types were launched, not in unsuccessful ones. In 1975 a Saturn 1B rocket launched Apollo CSM-111 into orbit for the APOLO SOYUZ project.
1 ton to LEO, which is more than Rocket Labs' Electron rocket but less than ESA Vega
So its basically the V2 v2.0
Wernher von Braun is smiling in heaven :)
Heaven?
@@Bateramos yes. Why are you asking?
@@geisterfahreruberholer2171 In the concentration camp where the V2 were manufactured, 20,000 prisoners died, about 1/3 of the prisoners went to this end, and certainly a very serious moral offense, and more.
@@alexs7189 so? Doesnt change a bit of him being father of spacetravel
@@geisterfahreruberholer2171 Yes, I know that, but he remains a controversial character.
Bavaria again 😂❤️
But Bavaria is GERMANY !!
Yeah I hqd to laugh so bad when I saw that flag in the backround
@Marcel Pram well because some americans think of germany as just Bavaria. It was just something iconic to me.
Of course its nice to see an European smallvehicle launch company, but you have to ceep in mind that they´ll have to compete with Rocket Lab and other competitors which have a better launch location (near the Equator).
I´m not so confident with their next year claim. Not showing the Engine or only its nozzle is one thing, but there are no big secrets about Hulls and Payload Bays.
I think they just have nothing really to show yet.
I guess the advantage here is...no US law involved! keep in mind the US is not exactly a player on the international stage who is all chill and positive towards each and everybody. also they have quite effectively demonstrated how unstable the political system is. so to have technology outside the US and outside US jurisdiction is a big plus... sadly Rocket Lab gave up this little advantage.
@@spanke2999 Yes, but let´s say Copenhagen Space decides to enter the comercial buiseness too, or Ariane decides to make a rocket which aims to fill that need.
Such a small Startup will have a hard time! They don´t really have a niche (yet).
They almost certainly have quite a lot to show since they won a 11 million euro competition by the DLR, basically germanys version of NASA...
@@lukas3709 Competing with ariane will be a breeze... They are basically a government agency. Slow and bureaucratic. They have utterly failed to compete with SpaceX for over a decade now...
Rocket lab launches about 40° south. And Isar or RFA will launch about 55° north. So both aren't really near the Equator.
If The goal is to compete with spacex and it’s not rapidly reusable it’s already obsolete.
Why launch from Norway? AFAIU the closer to the equator the more free 'energy' one gets due to the higher rotational speed of the earth.
No suitable locations in Europe.
How does launching in Norway work out, would think its a huge handicap .its kind of opposite to everyone else that wants to have launchpad as close as possible to Equator
They are most likely targeting SSO, Sun Synchronous Orbit, that means the small satellite can get constant sunlight, thus not needing a lot of batteries, reduces launch mass, and SSO satellites can covers the whole earth surface.
SSO needs a polar launch, thus launching from southern hemisphere (Rocket Labs New Zealand launch site) or in this case northern hemisphere, Norway, would be optimal.
Although, equatorial launch sites typically can also do polar launches.
@@1ndragunawan > equatorial launch sites typically can also do polar launches.
In fact, equatorial launch sites can do ANY launches. This makes them optimal.
Governments -"for hope, everyone look up!" Lololol
The last time rocket name i
Remembered was the V 2 rocket.. hmmmm the ancestors of space vehicle..
😁 Welcome back Germany to the game...
Show us your flavours of innovation...😱😁☮️🖖
smol Glenn
So when is the launch date??
Germany is in the game baby💪💪
Very good journalism. Keep up the good work.
Just wait until you see Iran and the Philippines response to Space X, and not least Norway
Korea successfully launched an ICBM last week. Nobody believes it was a failed satellite launch and nobody was ever expected to believe so. Then, why can't Germany launch multistage liquid rockets despite much larger economy size? Korea is now allowed to make and launch conventional solid propelled ICBMs and has hypersonic vehicles but that is a different issue.Maybe in 20 years Germany would be in the position Israel and some others have now-capable of launching a few hundred kg payload but not over 1 tonne like Korea.The father of Korean liquid rockets was Dr.Sergej Korolev .Solid rockets were invented to fight the Japanese army about 600 years ago.
its not about german startup or space x, its about humanity and space exploration because once you left earth, you are not only citizen of your country but you are a Earthen.
But for leaving earth you need something bigger than this better new year firework rocket
This is super cool something I did not know 🚀
Does it run on Diesel?
any clue on how to invest in that company?
Search them up. If they ain't registered at the boerse you can't though.
@AR V would you like to see my investment pitch?
You can't if you don't have insane amounts of money... That's the way it is in high risk high reward investments.
I'd really wanted to hear why anybody would want to choose this particular brand over other companies in the micro-launcher sector. Comparing it to SpaceX with their aimed payloads 100x the size of this bavarian rocket seems off. It's an entirely different league. There is very hard competition in the form of other companies like Rocket Lab with their 3D-printed rockets and engines printed from titanium dust within a single day(!) and countless others who are close to or already have launched and established their reputation within the industry. There is so much competition and innovation even in Europe with those guys in Scotland and their space tug (can't recall the name of the company) capable of pushing old satellites and debris into a graveyard or reentry orbit after delivering their payload. Seems to me that this niche is already taken and the announcment of Peter Beck, CEO of Rocket Lab that they will have to expand into SpaceX's market with their new Neutron Rocket alongside with a video of him literally eating his own hat for doing so despite his earlier vows to stay in this sector just visualizes how great the pressure is already in a most peculiar way. The EU and Germany might already be too late, as always.
THEY ARE COMPETING FOR THE SAME BUSINESS my friend!
Don't underestimate the manufacturing know how you'll find especially in bavaria. Some very sophisticated manufacturing going on here... Sure SpaceX and Rocket lab have a massive head start and it's gonna be very hard but don't write them off just yet...
TUM also has a quite advanced student rocketry organization (WARR).
Unbelievable cool. Best wishes ever.
IMO the big question that has to be asked...
What exactly is the business model and cost per launch you're targeting, in this case are you really trying to provide a small payload commercial launch service or will the launch service be subsidized in some way, possibly as a research project?
Although it's true that payloads are getting smaller in size and weight all the time, services like SpaceX then carry multiple payloads into orbit.
The specific launch vehicle mentioned in this video is supposed to be only about 2 meters in diameter... I'm going to guess that means it won't be able to carry multiple payloads and can only place them in low earth orbit. That size is only a little larger than what you might find built by hobbyists. Any smaller and you almost can't consider it a commercial launch vehicle. So, what is the target cost per launch? Elon Musk a bit infamously commented about Rocketdyne's R&D a few months ago that Musk didn't think their target size was feasable... In Musk's opinion the rocket should be a bit larger around the size of a Falcon 9 as the minimal size to be commercially competitive.
Germany and German engineers were the first to launch rockets and helped Americans to reach the Moon.. Germans can send rockets to space too
You know most of the ariane is build in germany.
no, 1/4 of NASA enigeers were chinese in USA, now its like 50%
also rocket is invention of china, not germany
@@xinyiquan666 Uh, no, there is no statistic that states that half or even 1/4 of NASA engineers are Chinese. At all.
To visualize the “Space Race” imagine a tractor trailer with the SpaceX logo plastered on the trailer going 80 MPH down a highway. Behind that you have smaller trucks with Boeing, Ariane, Blue Origin, and behind those trucks some cars marked Rocket Lab and companies like the one featured. All the other vehicles are flooring it but the headwinds won’t let them get above 65 MPH.
Elon Musk cult members in the comments are worse than Wumao
@@pakde8002 Haha, calling out Elon fanboys doesn’t change facts. Look at the $3 billion HLS award that SpaceX got from NASA. That was an objective evaluation of merit and old space lost.
Rocketlab behind Blue Origin?? :D
Who's been to orbit? hehe
A spaceport in Norway. Isn’t this way too inefficient for rocket launches considering how far north it is?
I feel ISRO is doing much then Germany
Call it the V3
The owner needs to be sat in a big leather chair, stroking a white Persian cat in his lap and turning a world globe on his desk while laughing
To compete with spaceX you need reusable rockets, not small rockets.
This is way smaller than Falcon 9, I expect there is a niche they will be able to carve out even if not reusable. Rocket size grows exponentially to payload mass.
I'll be the first Jamaican to Launch a satellite into space
Count on me
Isn't Norway way too high on latitude for a good launch complex?
Space will now have a taste of “Made in Germany” 😎
Unfortunately, based on this video i have my doubt if it's got much chance for succes.
I totally disagree with his vision that small satellites means demands for small rockets. When a 100 of them can be loaded on 1 big rocket, its much more economic. Other than that, we need bigger and even bigger rockets to get space construction and manufacturing going.
I guess with their launch platform in Norway they will be targeting a niche for polar orbits, but still not convinced.
80 years after V2 ... (National-)Socialism really screwed us up
@@antondegroot6061 but they might need different orbits so when each small sat can have its own rocket they can get in the exact Orbit they want to.
That's the reason why rocketLab is quite successful
@@ftr98 Yes, but i assume it is much more economic if you gather a bunch of satellites together when their orbits are very similar. Seems cheaper to me to make sure your satellite has 500 or 1000 m's delta-V to get into its exact orbit if you can save tens of millions of dollars on launch costs. Satellites need to have some propulsion anyway, so adding a bit more delta-V should be a simple matter of adding fuel i would think ? With the market expanding rapidly, it should be easier to find enough satellites that are aiming for a very similar orbit. Of course i am not sure, i am only a keyboard warrior and all my space/rocketry knowledge is what i get from playing KSP and watching scott manley and tim dodd.
Especially when starship is a thing and cargo space/weight is abundant, i could imagine spaceX (or another contractor) even offering little drones that bring your satellite even closer to its intended orbit, then return to starship so everything is fully reusable. Maybe the drones could also be used to clean up space debris :) If i were a billionaire, i would probably consider starting a company that makes such drones. (as a first start, to be followed by drones that can do construction work in space)
"Made in Germany !" Are you talking of sledges like the VW ? Time has moved, mate, whilst you were celebrating your made in Germany. Wake up !
Doesn't really inspire confidence when your showing computed generated graphics, still looking forward to actually seeing perform
V3?
I was trying to listen if the rickets can land themselves. Compared to space x
Not to be rude, but if they would, it's likely they would have mentioned it.
🇺🇸🇯🇵🇩🇪 is Looking forward for Space Travel Cheers to these nations
🇮🇳
The analysis is not quite right. SpaceX is launching many small satellites with their Falcon 9 rocket. They launch several at a time so they are way cheaper.
Straight out lie: Big launch providers don't care about small satellites.
But they do. SpaceX routinely launches over 60 satellites using Falcon 9. They intend to accommodate several hundred per launch when Starship is ready. They're already doing rideshare launches for smallsat customers.
RIdesharing is big business. Several companies act as a kind of middleman - they sell launch services to smallsat customers, aggregate them into a launch module, contract for and schedule launches with major launch providers. It's working very well.
Dedicated Earth-to-Orbit for smallsats, using expendable launch vehicles, is not a business model that has legs. Economies of scale matter. So does reusability.
Sure... Ridesharing is great when the one operating it happens to fly into an orbit somewhat close to where you want to be... But if you want some less popular positions, you'll need your own launch... Also the hardest thing is getting to orbit, once you've demonstrated that with a smaller rocket, you will likely find enough investors to build a bigger and reusable one...
@@meamzcs There *are* no unpopular LEO orbits. There are customers for every orbit, because there is no part of the Earth's surface that is uninteresting to *someone.*
SpaceX itself has need for just about every LEO orbit imaginable for its Starlink constellation.
If you want unpopular orbits, you have to go further out, to geostationary or transit orbits. Which you can't reach with a small expendable rocket.
The only factor keeping small expendable launchers going right now is the fact that large providers do *not* have fully reusable launch vehicles. Even SpaceX doesn't have one, yet. Falcon 9 expends the upper stage, so the cost is still pretty high, which affects affordability and launch cadence. Falcon 9 *can* deliver smallsats to any LEO orbit with ridesharing, but because the launch cadence is limited, there might be a considerable wait before a desired orbit is accessible using Falcon 9. This opens the door a crack for small launch providers.
Starship changes this equation by lowering the cost to orbit significantly, which is going to goose launch cadence by a lot. SpaceX will fill out its own Starlink constellation much more rapidly with Starship, and ridesharing will be available for desired orbits more frequently.
In other words, Starship is coming for those small expendable launch providers. They won't be able to survive without full reusability - which probably is impossible with small launch vehicles.
They'll have to go from unprofitable non-reusable rockets (profits gutted by Starship ridesharing) to fully-reusable launch vehicles *without showing positive margins on expendable rocket launches.* That's asking a lot of investors - who will be reluctant to expect the level of expertise from a small launch provider that would be required to match SpaceX's innovations and pace.
The launch industry will be winnowed. Both large and small providers will be eliminated through consolidations or bankruptcy. This isn't unexpected; disruption tends to do that. Make no mistake, Starship is disruption on steroids.
If it works. We shall see!
It's called the V3.
isar aerospace
I'll be back when the rocket is ready.
Hr. Prof. Walter seems to be a "stiller Gesellschafter" of ISAR ("silent partner", based on what I know of how Germany and Austria work).
Professor Walter is mis-informed on several of the issues discussed
What about launches like this one SpaceX will be doing?: July - Transporter-2: D-Orbit, LINCS A, LINCS B, Mandrake 2A, Mandrake 2B, Outpost tech demo, SAI-2, Satellogic sat (x4), Sherpa-FX2 [ARTHUR-1, Astrocast (x5), Hawk (x3), LEMUR-2 (x4), Lynk-06, SpaceBEE (x12), hosted payload: NFB-4, SOARS, TagSat-2], Sherpa-LTE1 [ARTHUR-1, Faraday Phoenix, Hawk (x3), HERON MkII, KSM-2 (Kleos Polar Vigilance Mission) (x5), Orbit Fab Tenzing, PAINANI-II, Shasta, Tiger-2], Vigoride-1 [Alba Cluster 3 (DelfiPQ, Grizu-263a, EASAT-2, Hades, TRSI-2, Sattla-2, Unicorn 1, Unicorn 2A, Unicorn 2D), AuroraSat-1, LABSAT, NUTSAT, STEAMSAT, SWIFTVISION, VZLUSAT-2], Vigoride-2 [Bhaarathiya-Sat, Broncosat-1, Dodona (La Jument (3U)), IRIS-A, Kepler-16, Kepler-17, Revela, SPARTAN, STORK-1, STORK-2, STORK-3, Steamsat-2, TROPICS Pathfinder], XR-2, YAM-3 - Falcon 9 - Canaveral SLC-40 / Kennedy LC-39A It seem the EU could do similar with their bigger rockets.
Can be like herding cats (Ariane 1st flight)
I hope those booster could be reused able like a falcon 9 or Star Ship(soon)
Most likely they would rather go the same route that Rocketlab has gone with their Electron rocket which is slowing it down with parachutes and then catching it with a helicopter which Rocketlab has now almost successfully demonstrated because the rocket is quite a lot smaller than Falcon 9.
That's a good thing , there should be no monopoly
Wait what ? We are building rockets ? I didn't know that !
Never bother. For us it takes 30 years for a new railroad connection to be built...
Is the Carrier rocket reusable? They will not be competitive if it not.
i dont think it will be reusable. but in that sence there is a monopoly.
@@Pssst.ByTheWay Might as well throw in the towel now. Bankruptcy is just around the corner.
@@khainguyen3056 its a small sat launcher. space x doesnt do those. unless you include ride sharing. and even then the waiting time will be long.
small sat launch market is beginning to boom. there will be customers. plenty.
but i think competition will be stiff, not from space x but the 100s of other small sat launchers comming into play the next years
@@Pssst.ByTheWay Small or big, reusable satellite is the way to go. Either Carrier rocket do it or another competitor will. Might as well be the first. Look at what happens to SpaceX's competitors.
@@khainguyen3056 i agree reusable is the way to go. none the less ISAR and other small sat launches have a market, reuse or no.
but yes you are right in, we will see what happenes to space x competitors. in the longer term reusable but till then the next 5 to 10 years single use will have its place.
we will see. agreed
Thumbnail is total clickbait. “Germany’s answer to SpaceX” LOL. Maybe it’s the answer to the SpaceX of 2004, before they ever launched, but not 2021.
One should think international cooperation is the way to go
Good luck Germany.
It is absolutely wrong to assert that as smaller satellites become more numerous that larger rockets are somehow disadvantaged. On the contrary, the launch provider that provides the least cost per kilogram to orbit has the economic advantage. When this advantage is large enough to offset any additional costs of required orbital adjustments imposed by riding a "bus" to LEO, then larger rockets are the clear winners. If this were not so, then SpaceX would surely have resurrected a Falcon 1 type rocket instead of pressing on to Starship, which will be able to launch hundreds of small satellites far far cheaper than a fleet of smaller launchers.
Cool! Kudos to human's success.
"let me show you it's features!"
They need to dream bigger. German engineering is capable of so much more
The way to go is to build a small rocket and after you got that to orbit you build a bigger one. It has been shown multiple times now that this is the correct thing to do. You don't start with a new Saturn V from nothing...
pls do built in philippines
But is it able to land, our Sauerkraut-Rocket?
maybe, but only in London and nose first
V4!
It is so confusing, ESA and Isar...
0:45 those are rookie numbers
I don't think any startup can beat spaceX
Focus puller fired
We need the return of Deutsche Qualität
👍❤
A little late in the day to sound so bombastic pal. Forget Spacex, Rocketlab is already doing this.
yeah...Roger is a bit Odd
What was SpaceX question?
Indian company skyroot will also lauch it's rocket in December 2021 please make a vedio on it