Many years ago I thought I would like to be an archaeologist and I was allowed to join a museum digging stone age for 1 week. It felt very abstract with arrow heads and so on - and then I found a pottery shard with the half-moon shape of a nail imprinted - and this made it feel so close and relevant - the thought that a person thousands of years ago had made this clay-item and just pressed their nail into it. I am still happy I didn't become an archaeologist, but the time-team series reminds me of the fascination I felt 40 years ago look at that nail mark - thank you guys !
As much as I agree, the problem is that would make for very bad television. Yes, they could do the groundwork, film everything, and edit into a fascinating TV special. But Time Team came out every week and was based on the suggestion by Mick Aston that you could learn almost everything you need to know about a site in only three days. This was based on his vast field experience and he meant that even on sites where he did spend months digging, they didn't learn anything new in the last 80% than they already figured out in the first 20%. I have seen many Time Team episodes where even Mick said he would love to spend more time, but by the end of the three day time limit they had already learned what they wanted to know. I find this format very exciting, especially when they go into a site with one set of expectations and the evidence turns that completely around. But I DO agree that I, for one, would love to see a TV show where they do spend more time on one site. I am almost always filled with more questions at the end of the show!
Matt is not just a digger when he works. He is a "finder". Seems to have a very keen eye and usually finds something significant that advances the research of the site.
When finding circles close together like these five could it be that when a daughter marries they set up a household near the family? Life seems so different and difficult back in Neolithic Era that having many family members would make things much easier. I am not knowledgeable in archeology but I find it fascinating!!! I love these programs they are so very well done.
I remember when I was younger me and my dad would sit and watch this together every week. We would also watch any of the history documentaries on World War Two. He took us too a place in South Shields where some Viking museum type place where they have done a dig and found loads of things on the plot tou visit I can’t remember the places name I was young but it was amazing
My Scottish grandmother used to call the small stone points I found as a kid, they were elf shot, firmly in her belief. Even today,tho I know better now,I still enjoy indulging in that mystery realm
Baldrick has educated himself; Edmund would be green with envy. I was just watching history vids and all of a sudden realized it was Baldrick expanding my mind and it was then mind blown.
This was a great episode. I do enjoy the bickering between professionals on their opinions! I also wish there was more time for better excavation. But 3 days does give it excitement. Plenty to do in a very short time.
And drinking cloudy apple juice that's been around a while then lying on your back watching the sky is Imax. And don't forget the little pointy mushrooms instead of popcorn.
All the people have regular jobs and coy do this on weekends. Also, there are sites everywhere in thUK and it is enough at times to identify a site that someone else can take. Further.
I agree although there are so many TT groupies who insist that actors are the same as authorities, preferring contrived drama and the thrill of treasure hunting to the reality of the stooped tedium and the mundane finds that make up the bulk of archaeological digs .
I would be surprised if there was any significant degree of separation between the spiritual and practical sides of existence, in many cultures much of the every day world has been viewed as inseparable from it's spiritual aspects. This constant insistence on every large structure automatically being mainly or solely for ritual is ridiculous when you consider the most effort expended would have been to survive and thrive then thank the gods when you have done what is necessary.
I would like to put forth the idea that the outer ring of ditches were dug and the inner ring of ditches filled in to enlarge the enclosure as the community grew and needed more space. It may also indicate it is the oldest of the rings. But there would be a practical limit to how large a Neolithic community and the use of its surrounding land could grow and still support its people. So, the other rings were then later dug a reasonable distance away from each other in order to better distribute and expand the use of the land and natural recourses in the area as the population increased. I would also like to suggest that the rings were located not to be seen from the river, but to look down towards the river to oversee the grazing livestock and to spot wild game and possible threats from predators that tend to follow and hunt along the river.
Every single time I see Francis Pryor I don't even have to think about it I know he's going to try and make it a religious site is there any place this guy's gone he hasn't deemed a religious site
While we'd enjoy it, they'd lose most of their audience, because most viewers have to be constantly stimulated, or they lose interest. Frankly, I'm amazed they managed an hour's show.
The thing is with Aurochs, you wouldn't capture an adult and take it to your 'farm', you would capture the young aurochs and take them to the farm and then they would get tamed and somewhat domesticated
.I have often wondered as they argue back-and-forth about whether it is ritual or something else, if it is even possible for us with our 21st century brains and everything that’s in them to not overthink what they were doing .we don’t know what they had in terms of language the depth and scope of it and language is so linked to behavior right? One of these days I hope to come across the episode where they actually explain what they all believe about mounds and ditches because sometimes I look at those mounds “and they say there’s usually a burial in the middle of it I’m thinking lots of times they find that person in a fetal position ……is that mound just a pregnant belly ?are they rebuilding the mothers abdomen and placing the person back in it
My best guess is that filming slows/disrupts actual dig sites too much, so they get a limited amount of time to film this show and then the team who's actually in charge of the site takes over.
@@larryzigler6812 It has been my experience in the past, when experts haven't figured it out, I am forced to figure it out myself. You can thank me later when they confirm my hypothesis.
it occurs to me that your ditches could be the forerunners of the moats used for protection in later times. Would it be ubsurd to think more primitive people could make their ditches for the same purpose, yet less impressive due to their needs
21:43 When they go to fill in the trenches they need to pitch those curtains in there too...christ, who in their right mind saw that fabric and thought "Ooh, these look nice!" 😱😱😱
Understandable that the people of the time were focused on boundaries. With agriculture comes a big time investment onto one place. Leaving that place means all that time and work was wasted. Going around and taking the crops from other people's farms was a very easy way without having to do the farming. So land ownership became a thing. And you would want to protect your land.
The ditches were dug against water. In Frisia (Netherlands) farms were built on man made hills: “terp”. Just like this site in ancient times, Frisia had many bodies of water, marshes and was always in danger of floods from sea. Artefacts were not put at the bottom for any higher reason, than that they were accidentally dropped and lost.
it is quiet funny how they are opening the ditches and they have water in them. is this why they dug them. so as to have a stable water supply. allbeit from the water table or from rain fall. remember that they surounded the village, so every one had access close to them. as a by product they may have found them to be a good defence
Anyone noticed how high the soil is above the causeway etc. A with nearly all of the sites are nearly a meter underground! So it stands to reason that if they want to find out whether mars was inhabited at one time ? they have to start digging not just scratching the surface! As the above is nearly a meter underground and 4.000 years old .
Not a ditch at all, but a ring of pits, which in and of themselves were of a ritual significance. Who better to defend a settlement than one's revered ancestors, and what better way to invoke them than a series of consecrated pits, perhaps each assigned to a different family or group (or to a seasonal orientation of the Sun, for example)? The scholarly tendency to declare for "ritual vs. domestic," each to the exclusion of the other, fails to acknowledge human nature. We have churches and temples, yes, but do we not also keep religious icons and mementoes of our departed loved ones in our homes? =^[.]^=
Also a massive fan, but never understood why they don't get local metal detectorist to go over the sight first,...time team is coming to dig up one of your fields in a few weeks, calling all metal detectors, hit that field before we get there....simples
I love this kind of stuff, but. all of these archaeological clips, have one thing in common, when ever they find a building or whatever, it must be a religious or culture center. Thats there goto response, when they don't have a clue.
As shown in many episodes, he sits somewhere nearby, paper and pencil in hand, and... draws. They educate him on the details of how things looked when unclear, and he fills in the rest.
Are you adopting wet sifting as the archaeologists in Israel have started doing? They have found many additional artifacts, often tiny ones by using wet sifting in addition to the dry sifting method.
@@amazinggrace5692 I get that you're trying to tell I. M. that it's pointless to bring up new archaeological techniques to the show, but there is no need to exaggerate things. Time team ran from 1994 to 2014, so the oldest of the episodes would be 28 years old, the youngest 8. Also could have just pointed out that Odyssey didn't even have a hand in the making of the show and is only a licenced broadcaster of the show.
@@Skyfire_The_Goth You’re seeing ill-intent where none was intended. It seemed as if you were asking a question and I wanted to make you aware that the people on the show wouldn’t be answering you. It was offered as a courtesy to you. Nothing more. Be of good cheer and chill. 💕🐝🐝🎆
@@amazinggrace5692 Never assumed ill intent, people exaggerate all the time without ill intent. Sometimes it isn't even a deliberate exaggeration, it's an exaggeration they've heard for a while and think it is truth. It's just irritating and of no practical use so I point it out and correct it when I know the numbers are exaggerated.
@@Skyfire_The_Goth Just saying I don’t exaggerate and indeed the show is decades old.. 28 years is nearly 3 decades dude. It’s just not an important point though. Much love 💕🐝🇺🇸
Archaeologists go to the same dig sights season after season for years. How can a three day limit be believable and workable. What other research and work goes on behind the scenes? I would be interested in that.
OK, to be clear, I haven't watched this episode (yet), but I want to know if anyone else had a "HUH?" moment when they read: "6,000 year old Cathedral"... Christianity is only 2,000 years old.
West has claimed indian holy scriptures as their own now they are trying to come up with something to justify the theft of Hindu scriptures ....mostly all fake Christianity is supposed to be 2000 years old though no historians ever mentioned christ during his time or even 300 years after him They wrote about politics economy even the religious beliefs of people but nothing about christ at all. People like Gandhi Hitler etc all have their history written but one person ...christ so famous is not mentioned by very famous historians that time?????
I agree - Cathedral is by the OED defined as the main church of a district under the care of a bishop.. So certainly could not be 6000 years old.. 17/18 hundred years ago would probably the oldest possibility of any cathedral.
Umm, they did worship and pray to many gods. Their cathedral is not the same as you are used to, but it is still a large place to give thanks to their gods.
Every time the question 'is it a ritual site or a domestic site' came up, I said 'bet it's both'. We really know very little about belief systems and worship in the Neolithic. Perhaps they surrounded the place they kept their livestock (a vital part of their lives) with offerings to the spirit world and the ancestors to ask those ancestors to protect the livestock. I do wonder how they got the livestock into the centre of the ring, considering the reconstructions don't seem to show any causeway or driveway large enough for livestock to get through even single file. I doubt they'd have let their cattle trample their ditches, so I wonder how they did it.
That's pretty much what I was thinking, as well. Feasts have (and still are) always been an important component of religious rituals, so mightn't they have brought the livestock to the site to be sacrifices? Even if the remains were treated like regular meals (tossed aside rather than respectfully buried), could the acts of killing and eating, themselves, still have been a religious ritual? Sort of like, for example, holiday meals nowadays: the preparation and eating of the meals is special, but the food is still disposed of like a regular, everyday meal (leftovers the next day and/or thrown in the trash).
Many years ago I thought I would like to be an archaeologist and I was allowed to join a museum digging stone age for 1 week. It felt very abstract with arrow heads and so on - and then I found a pottery shard with the half-moon shape of a nail imprinted - and this made it feel so close and relevant - the thought that a person thousands of years ago had made this clay-item and just pressed their nail into it. I am still happy I didn't become an archaeologist, but the time-team series reminds me of the fascination I felt 40 years ago look at that nail mark - thank you guys !
What a lovely memory. Thanks for sharing that.
I've always enjoyed this show. I would have LOVED for them to take at least one site and take three weeks or even three months to study it.
no
@@larryzigler6812 who are you?
As much as I agree, the problem is that would make for very bad television. Yes, they could do the groundwork, film everything, and edit into a fascinating TV special. But Time Team came out every week and was based on the suggestion by Mick Aston that you could learn almost everything you need to know about a site in only three days. This was based on his vast field experience and he meant that even on sites where he did spend months digging, they didn't learn anything new in the last 80% than they already figured out in the first 20%. I have seen many Time Team episodes where even Mick said he would love to spend more time, but by the end of the three day time limit they had already learned what they wanted to know. I find this format very exciting, especially when they go into a site with one set of expectations and the evidence turns that completely around. But I DO agree that I, for one, would love to see a TV show where they do spend more time on one site. I am almost always filled with more questions at the end of the show!
I agree
@@thatwiseoldbitchchannel Thanks for your support .
I would really have loved studying archaeology in the field under Phil and Francis.
And under Stewart! 🥰
Time Team is absolutely epic television that will be watched for decades to come...well done, everyone!
yes
I really love Phil, he's like everyones fave uncle and he's still going strong all these years later!!
Matt is not just a digger when he works. He is a "finder". Seems to have a very keen eye and usually finds something significant that advances the research of the site.
When finding circles close together like these five could it be that when a daughter marries they set up a household near the family? Life seems so different and difficult back in Neolithic Era that having many family members would make things much easier. I am not knowledgeable in archeology but I find it fascinating!!! I love these programs they are so very well done.
I remember when I was younger me and my dad would sit and watch this together every week. We would also watch any of the history documentaries on World War Two. He took us too a place in South Shields where some Viking museum type place where they have done a dig and found loads of things on the plot tou visit I can’t remember the places name I was young but it was amazing
My Scottish grandmother used to call the small stone points I found as a kid, they were elf shot, firmly in her belief. Even today,tho I know better now,I still enjoy indulging in that mystery realm
And she was right
nothing is more fantastic than what we learn to be true.
Maybe she knew better ;)
In a thousand years time, archaeologists will dig up Francis Prior and conclude that he was likely used for religious or ritual purposes.
He’d probably love that! 😋
😂
If folks in the Neolithic saw so many of us staring at Time Team, we would actually meet their definition of ritual, wouldn't we?
And they will say how stupid and ungodly man kind was at that time .how ungodly in lightened they were.blessings to all
Baldrick has educated himself; Edmund would be green with envy. I was just watching history vids and all of a sudden realized it was Baldrick expanding my mind and it was then mind blown.
If you want another wild ride, watch Baldrick tell children's stories in Fat Tulip's Garden.
The amazing powers you get by ingesting turnips. Imagine Baldrick as Superhero called Cunning Plan!
💚🏜️ yes, this is an awesome show, I would love a longer exploration of some of the sites, maybe a three episode series.
Thank you Time Team,you have helped me get through Covid...so far.
This was a great episode. I do enjoy the bickering between professionals on their opinions! I also wish there was more time for better excavation. But 3 days does give it excitement. Plenty to do in a very short time.
I just live watching people doing what they love on a Weekend
My friend calls staring into the campfire 'caveman TV channel one'.
Looking at light on the water is channel two.
And drinking cloudy apple juice that's been around a while then lying on your back watching the sky is Imax. And don't forget the little pointy mushrooms instead of popcorn.
Wish they would finish their digs instead of only three days. They leave soooo much hanging. I would like to see the digs completely finished.
All the people have regular jobs and coy do this on weekends. Also, there are sites everywhere in thUK and it is enough at times to identify a site that someone else can take. Further.
Please don't ever mention that again !!!!
On occasion, they spend more time. It is 2 shows worth, so about a week?
I agree although there are so many TT groupies who insist that actors are the same as authorities, preferring contrived drama and the thrill of treasure hunting to the reality of the stooped tedium and the mundane finds that make up the bulk of archaeological digs .
@@annarboriter no
I love that they disagree so agreeably about what might be found. 🙂
That's the beauty of English language and culture for you ❤️
they should have had Tony on hand for the exhumation of Richard the 3rd, "Oh dear, Richard the 3rd"
"Really, Baldrick? A carpark? That was your clever plan?"
“But on this side you can see it...”doesn’t skip a beat 🤣🤣🤣 9:46
Just keep tapping that blue time stamp 🤣🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤣
Thanks so much for posting
Phil and his jorts, I love it!
these circles or coils r all around the world...great job guys! baldrick is amazing character)))even here) he is so funny and charming))
I would be surprised if there was any significant degree of separation between the spiritual and practical sides of existence, in many cultures much of the every day world has been viewed as inseparable from it's spiritual aspects. This constant insistence on every large structure automatically being mainly or solely for ritual is ridiculous when you consider the most effort expended would have been to survive and thrive then thank the gods when you have done what is necessary.
The same districts are in the territory of Poland and present-day Germany. They are dated around 6000+ BC.
Another enjoyable TT episode but I must have missed something. The title refers to a buried cathedral but I certainly didn't see any signs of that.
I would like to put forth the idea that the outer ring of ditches were dug and the inner ring of ditches filled in to enlarge the enclosure as the community grew and needed more space. It may also indicate it is the oldest of the rings. But there would be a practical limit to how large a Neolithic community and the use of its surrounding land could grow and still support its people. So, the other rings were then later dug a reasonable distance away from each other in order to better distribute and expand the use of the land and natural recourses in the area as the population increased.
I would also like to suggest that the rings were located not to be seen from the river, but to look down towards the river to oversee the grazing livestock and to spot wild game and possible threats from predators that tend to follow and hunt along the river.
Phil making weed jokes about the tree stump. I love it.
As much as I want to watch these programs, there is no way I will have anything to do with Netflix.
I give a hearty second! It’s part of the degradation of our culture and morals.
Well, there is always the UA-cam....
I agree. Dropped my subscription two years ago. Degradation is an understatement.
I watch on you tube.
I dont understand the referencing to Netflix? this is YT?🤷♀️
I'm still waiting for the "Buried Cathedral" segment of this video.
Listening to them reminds me of a great ‘ 60’s comedy,
Hard to take them serious 🤣
Fascinating, thank you!
Crop marks: exist
Archaeologists: neolithic structures!
History channel: A L I E N S
"Dig through the dirches and burn through the witches..."
Anyone else get that going through their head?
Every single time I see Francis Pryor I don't even have to think about it I know he's going to try and make it a religious site is there any place this guy's gone he hasn't deemed a religious site
Francis Pryor - the thinking person's drinking game. Take a drink every time he says "ritual", "ceremonial", "worship" or "ancestors".
yes 1!
he deemed that one, a site of significant ritual ceremonial worship activities
Imagine given more time on each of these sights🙏😎🇦🇺👍
While we'd enjoy it, they'd lose most of their audience, because most viewers have to be constantly stimulated, or they lose interest. Frankly, I'm amazed they managed an hour's show.
Love these videos.
Love these
The thing is with Aurochs, you wouldn't capture an adult and take it to your 'farm', you would capture the young aurochs and take them to the farm and then they would get tamed and somewhat domesticated
Great Stuff. Thanks.
Young Matt!
Sights I can't unsee. Phil in shorts.
Thank you.
.I have often wondered as they argue back-and-forth about whether it is ritual or something else, if it is even possible for us with our 21st century brains and everything that’s in them to not overthink what they were doing .we don’t know what they had in terms of language the depth and scope of it and language is so linked to behavior right? One of these days I hope to come across the episode where they actually explain what they all believe about mounds and ditches because sometimes I look at those mounds “and they say there’s usually a burial in the middle of it I’m thinking lots of times they find that person in a fetal position ……is that mound just a pregnant belly ?are they rebuilding the mothers abdomen and placing the person back in it
I have enjoyed this dig; thankyou. Am I donating to the fundraiser? Not on your nelly!
really good music choices for the background.
Puts a new meaning to super bowl. Sitting around making your food bowls for eating.
It was their way of saying 'Thank You'
16 min in thats pretty cool they found an ancient water filter.
The half fired pot could be explained away as there being torrential rain at the time they wanted to fire it
Why do they only ever have three days? Not sure i've heard an explanation
My best guess is that filming slows/disrupts actual dig sites too much, so they get a limited amount of time to film this show and then the team who's actually in charge of the site takes over.
Very interesting
Are there any time team episodes that are not already on you tube?
"No bevy I suppose?" :-)
What about them making the ditches to form a trap to catch those large animals? Perhaps they lured them into the circle, and killed them there?
Thanks Einstein
@@larryzigler6812 Another stupid comment, what's the problem now?
@@larryzigler6812 You're welcome.
@@josephhewes3923 Brontosaurs burger is my favorite !!!!
@@larryzigler6812 It has been my experience in the past, when experts haven't figured it out, I am forced to figure it out myself. You can thank me later when they confirm my hypothesis.
it occurs to me that your ditches could be the forerunners of the moats used for protection in later times. Would it be ubsurd to think more primitive people could make their ditches for the same purpose, yet less impressive due to their needs
So..where did "Cathedral" come into it?
It was the tribal trading place. The burial rings are for offerings back to mother Earth and for marking the location of the site.
מעניין
25:27 Now, is it just me or might Dr. Harding have the beginnings of a crush going on? 40:36
21:43 When they go to fill in the trenches they need to pitch those curtains in there too...christ, who in their right mind saw that fabric and thought "Ooh, these look nice!" 😱😱😱
Phils nails scare me 😂 great ep tho
Am I the only one who can't find time team on history hit?
Three days isn't NEARLY enough time for all you need to do. It's ridiculous!
Understandable that the people of the time were focused on boundaries. With agriculture comes a big time investment onto one place. Leaving that place means all that time and work was wasted. Going around and taking the crops from other people's farms was a very easy way without having to do the farming. So land ownership became a thing. And you would want to protect your land.
The ditches were dug against water. In Frisia (Netherlands) farms were built on man made hills: “terp”. Just like this site in ancient times, Frisia had many bodies of water, marshes and was always in danger of floods from sea.
Artefacts were not put at the bottom for any higher reason, than that they were accidentally dropped and lost.
There seems to be an easy compromise. They were pulling in large numbers of animals for sacrifice and ceremony.
it is quiet funny how they are opening the ditches and they have water in them. is this why they dug them. so as to have a stable water supply. allbeit from the water table or from rain fall. remember that they surounded the village, so every one had access close to them. as a by product they may have found them to be a good defence
Anyone noticed how high the soil is above the causeway etc.
A with nearly all of the sites are nearly a meter underground!
So it stands to reason that if they want to find out whether mars was inhabited at one time ?
they have to start digging not just scratching the surface!
As the above is nearly a meter underground and 4.000 years old .
Whole lot of fantasizing going on here. I'm a little skeptical. I love the shows but I feel they do lot of imaging with not much proof.
Looks like a henge that the stones have long been robbed out.
Ditches help drain wetlands making the surrounding land more useful.
Not a ditch at all, but a ring of pits, which in and of themselves were of a ritual significance. Who better to defend a settlement than one's revered ancestors, and what better way to invoke them than a series of consecrated pits, perhaps each assigned to a different family or group (or to a seasonal orientation of the Sun, for example)? The scholarly tendency to declare for "ritual vs. domestic," each to the exclusion of the other, fails to acknowledge human nature. We have churches and temples, yes, but do we not also keep religious icons and mementoes of our departed loved ones in our homes? =^[.]^=
The buried cathedral hidden underneath pe good shows
I’d like to see a sample in the thumbnail preview not a add.
Why every time just 3 days to see what is in the ground?
Also a massive fan, but never understood why they don't get local metal detectorist to go over the sight first,...time team is coming to dig up one of your fields in a few weeks, calling all metal detectors, hit that field before we get there....simples
Neolithic sites wouldn't produce much if any metal, plus theyr'e only interested in this time period, so it would be a waste of their precious time.
What? No rain?
Cathedral? That's a stretch for a pile of earth....
If it was any good and popular, you would not have to compare the History channel with Netflix mate
..Fens were also full of food..
We are either way newer than thought or way older...
I love this kind of stuff, but. all of these archaeological clips, have one thing in common, when ever they find a building or whatever, it must be a religious or culture center. Thats there goto response, when they don't have a clue.
I want to see a vid showing how that terrific artist created his drawings.
As shown in many episodes, he sits somewhere nearby, paper and pencil in hand, and... draws. They educate him on the details of how things looked when unclear, and he fills in the rest.
@@kuzzbillington6392 What a great gig!
Victor Ambrus was very talented, but the people probably didn't look like that at all. He was filling in gaps with familiar ideas.
There is one on You Tube somewhere. Look him up.
Still Balbrick!
What? 6,000 years? Are you talking about a Neolithic monument?
S12 E5 - "A Neolithic Cathedral?", 30 January 2005
no mention of hazelnuts🌰🌰
"head of the family" ? Isn't the presumption of hierarchy a rather tall assumption?
Are you adopting wet sifting as the archaeologists in Israel have started doing? They have found many additional artifacts, often tiny ones by using wet sifting in addition to the dry sifting method.
These shows are several decades old now. So what you see is based on those times.
@@amazinggrace5692 I get that you're trying to tell I. M. that it's pointless to bring up new archaeological techniques to the show, but there is no need to exaggerate things. Time team ran from 1994 to 2014, so the oldest of the episodes would be 28 years old, the youngest 8. Also could have just pointed out that Odyssey didn't even have a hand in the making of the show and is only a licenced broadcaster of the show.
@@Skyfire_The_Goth You’re seeing ill-intent where none was intended. It seemed as if you were asking a question and I wanted to make you aware that the people on the show wouldn’t be answering you. It was offered as a courtesy to you. Nothing more. Be of good cheer and chill. 💕🐝🐝🎆
@@amazinggrace5692 Never assumed ill intent, people exaggerate all the time without ill intent. Sometimes it isn't even a deliberate exaggeration, it's an exaggeration they've heard for a while and think it is truth. It's just irritating and of no practical use so I point it out and correct it when I know the numbers are exaggerated.
@@Skyfire_The_Goth Just saying I don’t exaggerate and indeed the show is decades old.. 28 years is nearly 3 decades dude. It’s just not an important point though. Much love 💕🐝🇺🇸
Archaeologists go to the same dig sights season after season for years. How can a three day limit be believable and workable. What other research and work goes on behind the scenes? I would be interested in that.
31:25
OK, to be clear, I haven't watched this episode (yet), but I want to know if anyone else had a "HUH?" moment when they read: "6,000 year old Cathedral"... Christianity is only 2,000 years old.
West has claimed indian holy scriptures as their own now they are trying to come up with something to justify the theft of Hindu scriptures ....mostly all fake
Christianity is supposed to be 2000 years old though no historians ever mentioned christ during his time or even 300 years after him
They wrote about politics economy even the religious beliefs of people but nothing about christ at all.
People like Gandhi Hitler etc all have their history written but one person ...christ so famous is not mentioned by very famous historians that time?????
I agree - Cathedral is by the OED defined as the main church of a district under the care of a bishop.. So certainly could not be 6000 years old.. 17/18 hundred years ago would probably the oldest possibility of any cathedral.
Sigh
@@rebelyell1580 Oh ,dear,
Umm, they did worship and pray to many gods. Their cathedral is not the same as you are used to, but it is still a large place to give thanks to their gods.
Every time the question 'is it a ritual site or a domestic site' came up, I said 'bet it's both'. We really know very little about belief systems and worship in the Neolithic. Perhaps they surrounded the place they kept their livestock (a vital part of their lives) with offerings to the spirit world and the ancestors to ask those ancestors to protect the livestock. I do wonder how they got the livestock into the centre of the ring, considering the reconstructions don't seem to show any causeway or driveway large enough for livestock to get through even single file. I doubt they'd have let their cattle trample their ditches, so I wonder how they did it.
That's pretty much what I was thinking, as well. Feasts have (and still are) always been an important component of religious rituals, so mightn't they have brought the livestock to the site to be sacrifices? Even if the remains were treated like regular meals (tossed aside rather than respectfully buried), could the acts of killing and eating, themselves, still have been a religious ritual? Sort of like, for example, holiday meals nowadays: the preparation and eating of the meals is special, but the food is still disposed of like a regular, everyday meal (leftovers the next day and/or thrown in the trash).
So like, what country is this? I'm ten minutes in and I don't think they have said yet. England?
Peterborough, England.
People of ancient times followed the food and migrated with the herds.
Clearly a waste dump where they burned their waste. Not everything you cannot explain have to be a ritual site 😄
why are UK folks so COOL.!
I loved this show when it was on telly but oh how we groaned every time the "ritual" bloke was on.
Maybe these are great catching pens for their herds. Perhaps they run them like they do the sheep in Iceland.