The Handmaid's Tale Analysis | FILMLAND

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,2 тис.

  • @Melissa-tw2gp
    @Melissa-tw2gp 5 років тому +809

    It’s actually implied that the men are infertile, not the women, especially the men from the military class who were exposed to chemicals. They are the source of the problem, but lower class men aren’t considered for the rituals and women are blamed as a matter of course.

    • @welshinc5782
      @welshinc5782 4 роки тому +85

      Especially in the books. Where some of the wives set up handmaidens with lower class men and we always see those women get pregnant

    • @aprettygothichick
      @aprettygothichick 4 роки тому +77

      Thats is correct. The doctor even says in the show "Most of those men are sterile."

    • @Melissa-tw2gp
      @Melissa-tw2gp 4 роки тому +8

      Lola Montez I’ve read the novel. But your points suppose that a brutal government makes rational choices. That’s not what that kind of society does. Think of Stalin killing all the Jewish doctors who could have saved his life. An oppressive society doesn’t look at what will work best, it leans heavily on its own belief system even if it’s damaging to the population. Also, the novel takes from true events, but that doesn’t mean you have to read it literally. It’s not so absurd to imagine a future where military are exposed to infertility through chemicals, but even if you think it is, she uses this as a plot device to reinforce her themes rather than a statement on the actual science of fertility. Children of Men is great, but it’s certainly not trying to convey the same themes and messaging as Handmaid is.

    • @Melissa-tw2gp
      @Melissa-tw2gp 4 роки тому +5

      Lola Montez yikes, okay. You’re clearly stuck on ideology here that no discussion will pry you away from.

    • @Laura-gd4ku
      @Laura-gd4ku 3 роки тому +8

      Thats because the infertility is just an excuse! It has always been about controlling the bodys of women and generally everybody.
      In my opinon the religion is not really important, its justification not more. Gilead to me is less like the islamic state and more like nazi germany. Its a facist neofeudal society.

  • @tomtrinchera8405
    @tomtrinchera8405 4 роки тому +209

    Lydia is one of the most vile, evil, despicable fictional characters I've ever seen and the actor who plays her, Ann Dowd, is one of the kindest, warm, seemingly nicest people I've on talk shows. Watch a few interviews with her, her cheery personality will blow your mind!

    • @Jillking45
      @Jillking45 4 роки тому +10

      She is an amazing actress!

    • @Mkr7942
      @Mkr7942 3 роки тому +5

      Which is why my conflict as I loved her and then wondered why?

  • @moonyollie6977
    @moonyollie6977 6 років тому +962

    The quote that sums it all up:
    "N'oubliez jamais qu'il suffira d'une crise politique, économique ou religieuse pour que les droits des femmes soient remis en question. Ces droits ne sont jamais acquis. Vous devrez rester vigilantes votre vie durant."
    Never forget that all it takes is a political, economic or religious crisis for women's rights to be put back into question. These rights are never truly acquired. You will have to be vigilant your whole life. -Simone de Beauvoir

    • @bigbananna1616
      @bigbananna1616 6 років тому +20

      AHHH yes Simone De Beauvoir, France's most famous Feminist and also a Pedophile who championed the rights of Adults (Male and Female) to have sex with children, actually attempting to get it enshrined in law. Quoting her in French (Misquoting actually) doesn't make you sound intelligent. Elle est un monstre, je doute que vous ayez lu ses œuvres au-delà de cette citation. If you had read her actual works you would know this instead you're just PARROTING something you heard in Gender Studies class and never actually bothered to check for yourself. Bonne journee mon ami :0)

    • @Artbug
      @Artbug 6 років тому +36

      LIterally what happened to Iran. They were a flourishing vibrant progressive country in the 70s. Then there government was taken over by Islam. They were not vigilant and they have regressed back. There's is a sad story.

    • @growltiger6
      @growltiger6 6 років тому +8

      Artbug, Iran did not have a progressive regime during the 1970s. The shah lead a totalitarian regime and his secret police committed horrible acts of evil. Exchanging the shah for the ayatollahs was a devil's bargain.

    • @crewmatewillthrowthesehand7600
      @crewmatewillthrowthesehand7600 5 років тому +1

      @@kingsosa6493 because big banana is fucked in the head and quoting MRA news site as legitimate sources

    • @crewmatewillthrowthesehand7600
      @crewmatewillthrowthesehand7600 5 років тому +4

      @@kingsosa6493 You still respect the the monarchies in the world that destroyed other countries and stole their shit. Just look at all the european museums and ask them if they want to give it back. But you still hold them in high regard do you not. What about Thomas edison who plagiarized and did dirty deeds to wipe out his competitors.
      www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/03/frances-existential-crisis-over-sexual-harassment-laws/550700/
      it is a national crisis, not something she championed. She isnt some omipotent being, a a french woman, she is still a product of her time and a product of her national environment. Right wingers would give the benefit of the doubt to Trump who acts so out of touch despite living in free America in the 21st century.

  • @redblaze8700
    @redblaze8700 5 років тому +1201

    A good reason for why religion should never be in government.

    • @mypetcrow9873
      @mypetcrow9873 5 років тому +64

      “When religion and politics ride in the same cart the whirlwind follows.” Dune

    • @februaryschild0216
      @februaryschild0216 5 років тому +31

      "Give onto Caesar what is Caesar's...give onto God what is God's." ~ Jesus. Caesar = Government. God = Spirit. Government is not God.

    • @redblaze8700
      @redblaze8700 5 років тому +23

      @@februaryschild0216 Tell that to those government officials who claims to do God's work.

    • @iprobablydislikeyou2735
      @iprobablydislikeyou2735 5 років тому +38

      Red Blaze looking at Saudi Arabia is already a good reason why the state and religion should be kept separate.

    • @arialawrence2851
      @arialawrence2851 5 років тому +12

      Red Blaze I don’t even think they are even christan or Baptist’s because I looked into both religions and Gilead is just it’s own fake religion

  • @noahsolomon1550
    @noahsolomon1550 2 роки тому +97

    the handmaid's tale does a good job of showing how the US without the seperation of church and state would be a nightmare and the loss of choice,identity and individual beliefs.

  • @Serai3
    @Serai3 6 років тому +542

    I hadn't noticed that the regime had erased all the street signs. That's an interesting detail.
    Oh, and the story doesn't _feel_ like a warning. It IS a warning. Just as much as _Nineteen Eighty Four._

    • @simonakatsman974
      @simonakatsman974 6 років тому +5

      They replaced them with numbers.

    • @kingofcheese6147
      @kingofcheese6147 5 років тому +2

      This comment baffles me

    • @selalewow
      @selalewow 5 років тому +15

      The scary part of 1984 is that not only is Big Brother watching, we gave him the keys to our privacy in the form of social media, Alexa and any other device we use to "share" our personal lives with the world or make our lives a little more "convenient".

    • @lynnc5252
      @lynnc5252 5 років тому +6

      Check out the documentary The Brainwashing of My Dad. ua-cam.com/video/813V_GId5N8/v-deo.html It explains how Fox and right wing propaganda has radicalized Americans for decades and it's truly frightening. Now add in hostile foreign countries.

    • @tomtrinchera8405
      @tomtrinchera8405 4 роки тому +5

      Have you seen season 3 yet? What they did to the DC Monument and the Lincoln Memorial is absolutely CHILLING.

  • @MrWeaselwork
    @MrWeaselwork 5 років тому +30

    Margaret Atwood specifically said she would not include anything in the book that hasn't already happened in the recent past, or is currently happening. This show is so relatable for me, (even as a so called: 'educated, privileged, white, middle class female.')
    I feel it deeply represents women's experiences around the world right now.

  • @suziekeuls7582
    @suziekeuls7582 6 років тому +48

    It's rape..not sex...

  • @jessica980
    @jessica980 6 років тому +190

    What's fascinating is the colours of their uniforms symbolises who they are and their status. Red generally symbolises lust, strength, courage, desire and is believed to raise blood pressure and respiratory rate. Blue/green symbolises power, growth, fertility, loyalty and health.
    Fair play if this was done intentionally :)

    • @jessica980
      @jessica980 6 років тому +2

      Melanie Willard I like symbolism :)

    • @sandracmyers
      @sandracmyers 6 років тому

      lol

    • @jessica980
      @jessica980 6 років тому +1

      Me too! I really like the costume designs and the very slight changes they've made in this series compared to the book.

    • @Serai3
      @Serai3 6 років тому +12

      The wives wear blue because of the Virgin Mary's robe, and the handmaids wear red because it's associated with the Magdalen and thus with sexuality. The thing I wonder is why they decided to go with such muted, depressed colors. In the book they were described as bright, so you could easily distinguish them from a distance.

    • @jennyfab312
      @jennyfab312 6 років тому +9

      it makes sense when they go to Canada. Even the "depressed" scenes are more vibrant. Vibrancy = freedom and choice.
      of particular notice is Serena Joy's greenhouse and the greenhouse in Canada
      (PS the 1990 movie had much more vivid colors)

  • @samslayerr
    @samslayerr 5 років тому +58

    This is so scary and now realize it’s happening in some countries today. Scary af it’s not just a show it’s reality

  • @rexp1727
    @rexp1727 6 років тому +274

    They always say the wives wear blue! It's always looked green to me!

    • @lemsip207
      @lemsip207 6 років тому +42

      They wore blue in the book and the film and teal in the TV series.

    • @chantalbellmont6937
      @chantalbellmont6937 6 років тому +39

      Officially, the costume designer has stated the colour is teal

    • @sweetcaroline942
      @sweetcaroline942 6 років тому

      It's tail.

    • @terihughes943
      @terihughes943 5 років тому +9

      Looks green to me

    • @sergiopieterse659
      @sergiopieterse659 5 років тому +18

      OMFG I thought I was going colourblind when he said blue.

  • @Jackieb741
    @Jackieb741 6 років тому +44

    I could be wrong but I thought the aunts had the most power out of all the women

    • @desiredoreen7916
      @desiredoreen7916 5 років тому +23

      actually no....there's a scene that clearly depicts their position when Serena the commander's wife gives an order to aunt Lydia about the girls (before the dinner scene)

    • @aprilpease8020
      @aprilpease8020 4 роки тому +6

      Once you read testaments you realize the Aunts are slaves as well.

  • @ineffablemars
    @ineffablemars 5 років тому +11

    I think the worst thing they ever did in this show was to Emily. It's the equivalent of surgically removing a mans penis but NO ONE ever talks about it. It makes my stomach turn. Every time I see her on screen I think about it.

    • @semi2893
      @semi2893 Рік тому +2

      I think the worst thing so far happened to Janine: they took her eye!

    • @FireMinstrel
      @FireMinstrel Місяць тому

      @@semi2893True. The Canadian doctor told Emily she could have reconstructive surgery for what they did to her, but you can’t reconstruct a non-existent eye.

  • @jen30551
    @jen30551 5 років тому +5

    Men should be worried not only for women but for themselves too. I appreciate that the book and series is careful to highlight that everyone but the very top in power lose all their rights and are subject to being murdered for the most arbitrary of reasons. And then hung up as a grisly display to those who consider rebelling. Everybody's loses in a society like Gilead.

  • @HubiferousBkubn
    @HubiferousBkubn 2 роки тому +4

    Can't believe I see some people in the comments genuinely caping for the commander or saying that the commander is oppressed too.
    The slave owner is not oppressed.
    Also amazing how people can take a look at the sexual exploitation of women here - and see it as a problem with 'gender'. They explicitly know which sex is usable as a 'national resource'. No matter what stripe of religion or wider culture. There is no guessing on the part of men. It has nothing to do with what women wear or say or do that makes them women.
    Men (and their Aunt Lydias) force gender because gender is the "how" of keeping women in line. Reproductive control is the "why".
    The Virgin Birth, foot binding, you name it. Same end, different means.

  • @greenbird777
    @greenbird777 3 роки тому +7

    Holy C**p - the way you started this video is TERRIFYING. I've watched that episode a few times now, but jumping right into the guts of that scene, with no foreshadowing or build up, gives it so much more punch. Damn, I've still got a shiver running through me.

  • @lifeisfun_n_diy1254
    @lifeisfun_n_diy1254 3 роки тому +9

    Theocracy is the worst form of any cracy. As can be seen today under isis, Taliban, etc.

    • @simonaivancic
      @simonaivancic 3 роки тому +1

      Not when it's done right. Which was never done really, as humans twist God and abuse and misuse their free will. Theocracy, without any religion ,cult ,secte ,etc...just Bible based...with original standard, love, morals ..is the optimal way... Islam or new age.or eastern religions are just Satan's replacements of true connection with God

  • @TraderTravels
    @TraderTravels 6 років тому +159

    I wouldn't just be scared for the women. Clearly unless you are an elite, the men also suffer loss of rights and identity.

    • @LeoBeastmode
      @LeoBeastmode 6 років тому +1

      Masticatious What levels are you talking about?

    • @TK_Danes
      @TK_Danes 6 років тому +10

      I conpletely understand that ecertone suffers under the .02% population. Children suffer by reprogramming and traumatized from being separated from their parents. Men killed on spot or sent to colonies if they arent already apart of the belief or willing to adapt to their regime. But the women and children has the horrid result of the loss of the war to freedom in this story. Women are raped monthly and even without the wives attention, manipulating and abusing their power for their lust. Being beaten for even rolling their eyes. The taking of their oen birth names both women and children in sure. Stripping them and piercing their ears like cattle. Having to bond with someonr but fear of speaking the truth of their pain.
      To be seen not heard
      Mrs. Waterford was a knowledgeable woman. Strong and full of drive.. She ended up following her husband. Giving up her dreams. And because she has no control over 99 percent of her life... She abuses and neglects her handmaids. Treating them as less than a dog themselves. Wives are the worst for even agreeing to the treatment of Handlmaids. Ugh! I was disgusted and wanting to punch every man in this story even Offreds husband. I rooted for him til i find out how they got together anf how he handled it.

    • @kingsosa6493
      @kingsosa6493 5 років тому +6

      @Masticatious what's your problem? You're trying to make some competition of who gets treated worse??? Tf is wrong with you people??? If you think a mistreated and abused hand maid is somehow ranked lower than some random guy who cuts meat at the butcher shop you're not only wrong but you're COMPLETELY missing the point of the entire story...read the book and stop this constant race to the finish line of "most oppressed"...you people kill me🤦🏽‍♂️😩

    • @kingofcheese6147
      @kingofcheese6147 5 років тому +4

      @Masticatious you're fucking brain dead

    • @kingofcheese6147
      @kingofcheese6147 5 років тому

      @@RobespierreThePoof

  • @delthomas6479
    @delthomas6479 6 років тому +166

    Millions of black men, women and children suffered in just such a regime, for over FOUR. HUNDRED. YEARS!

    • @scorpiogirlva8421
      @scorpiogirlva8421 6 років тому +30

      Del Thomas And still do to some extent. Instead of the color of your clothes symbolizing your rank in society, it's the color of one's skin.

    • @delthomas6479
      @delthomas6479 6 років тому +7

      Scorpio GirlVA You're so right. It's an outcry that people are making such a fuss about this piece of fiction but the reality is so insignificant, so forgotten. But I guess it's because westerners fear it happening to them.

    • @mypetcrow9873
      @mypetcrow9873 6 років тому +2

      Del Thomas YES WE FUCKING KNOW. THIS IS A VID ON THT, NOT YOUR HISTORICAL “FOCUS.”

    • @delthomas6479
      @delthomas6479 6 років тому +2

      C Geer When they go low, we go high. Good day to you day to you sir.

    • @evaalvarado1020
      @evaalvarado1020 6 років тому +1

      I was thinking the same thing when watching the show

  • @raymondstpaul4913
    @raymondstpaul4913 6 років тому +148

    What a depressing regime to live under

    • @michaezell4607
      @michaezell4607 6 років тому +30

      It's Exactly the regime that rightwing republicans want. This is why Atwood first wrote the novel to begin with.

    • @Kizzy-qb9si
      @Kizzy-qb9si 6 років тому +7

      I lived in micro sized example of this, my mother maintained an extreme religious hierarchy in her house.

    • @dirtygiraffe
      @dirtygiraffe 6 років тому +15

      michaeł Zell Living in Gilead is like living in countries under muslim rule. There's actually an interview with Atwood where she says she was partially inspired by the shit that went down in Persia/Iran in 79 and the aftermath.
      Back in the 80's there was actually feminists that cared about what happened to women in muslim countries. These days you will be called a racist or some other buzzword if you speak about it.

    • @jennyfab312
      @jennyfab312 6 років тому +7

      Welcome to trump's america. He is itching to hire ultra-conservative justices that will be pushed through. mcconnell already said they will approve anyone trump chooses (actually probably chosen by mcconnell, sessions, and pence). So women can kiss one freedom away already.
      They are already telling their cult to go and assault or murder journalists. (that's two).
      the president (who doesn't even READ) says that white supremacists who murder protesters are "very fine people"
      Are we that far from republicans getting their wish to have their own handmaid to rape?
      We are already in Gilead.

    • @charleschapman6810
      @charleschapman6810 6 років тому

      AndasMs. Atwood says. Everythinginthe books already happened somewhere! But it's not America!Gilead's violent opposition comes from the Baptist Churc! Hardlywhat you'dexpectif Gileadreallywas a fundamentalist christianoperation it isn't. Ifanythingitsan attempt to frag a modern society backintothe Bronze Age!

  • @lisanoonan1267
    @lisanoonan1267 5 років тому +12

    There is such a strong parallel with the high control group, the Jehovah Witnesses. The show might be more extreme, but, this group is a close runner up!

    • @the8thchurch461
      @the8thchurch461 2 роки тому

      Many American cults are exactly like that. Jehovah'S witness, Seventh Day Adventists, Assemblies of God and numerous others. The question is WHY??

  • @Tina06019
    @Tina06019 6 років тому +41

    Where are the Econowives?

    • @simonakatsman974
      @simonakatsman974 6 років тому +3

      They are seen in the second season

    • @agirlwithdreams15
      @agirlwithdreams15 6 років тому +5

      I wonder if we will see any Widows

    • @DenaInWyo
      @DenaInWyo 6 років тому +5

      But where are they in the rankings, out of curiosity? Probably just above a Martha? But above or below a handmaid? They're kind of a non-person, really. If they are fertile, chances are Gilead would find a way to put them into "service".

    • @katelldrouet5977
      @katelldrouet5977 5 років тому +16

      @@DenaInWyo If I remember well, the econowives are just above Marthas, because they are married and potentially fertile. However, since they ARE married, they cannot be taken away from their husband, and therefore, cannot become Handmaids, who were chosen as a way to "redeem" themselves from their past "lust" (remarriage, children outside of wedlock, homosexuality, etc...). But at the end of the novel, that takes place in the future during a conference (given by men scholars), it is stated that with the systematic repression of little acts of rebellion, Gilead was "dangerously" lacking Handmaids, so they decided to declare all marriages prior to the regime's rise to power illegal, and at that moment Econowives could become Handmaids. ^^

  • @passionoflovers
    @passionoflovers 4 роки тому +4

    EVERYONE is under the boot in Giliad. Even Fred is being held down when being around his peers. Aunt Lydia has several moments of doubt and regret. Not one person (except the truly higher ups) seem to enjoy anything of whats going on.
    My only real complain about this show is that June has way too much plot amor at times. It's like they know she's the main character. She gets away with so much stuff all the time, while people around her gets their eyes taken out for saying ''fuck''.
    Everyone in Giliad is a two-faced bipolar mess. One scene is filled with compassion, hope and comfort and the very next is screaming and violence. They did a very good job of capturing the despair in all of these people.
    Also, Hollywood should take notes of June - THIS IS HOW YOU DO STRONG FEMALE CHARACTERS!! She has flaws, he makes mistakes, she's selfish, she's HUMAN and yet she prevails. Not because she's a super special and awesome woman but because she is a clever and strong person!

    • @christianmiller9934
      @christianmiller9934 2 місяці тому

      While it is true everyone except the very top is under the boot of gileas not all the oppression is made equal that’s what’s missed by a lot of people reading dystopic fiction their is a hierarchy to ensure there is never a majority who could rise against them

  • @Jezzebel1313
    @Jezzebel1313 6 років тому +3

    Isn't it interessting, how the wifes get back a piece of power by using the hypocrisy of their husband? The hypocrisy that they could live the high standards of morality they demand from others, but using their power, to get every obscenity they ever dreamed of. It is so fascinating when he (Mr. Fred) realized it.

  • @jaymacmusic8739
    @jaymacmusic8739 4 роки тому +5

    That history has a mixture of real things.
    1. Totalitarian regime: ideological and economical. Is a mixture of Cambodia (Gilian is described as a feudal economy, erasing evidence of technology, art, literature, depriving high education etc.. and the other similitude is: it was generated by a terrorist group) and North Korea regime (fanaticism, absolute control, false propaganda).
    2. Religious Extremism : reminds the Sharia in the Muslim culture. (Muslim revolution). Also it reminds me the Inquisition.
    3. Patriarchal society.
    Anyways that sounds sad.

  • @Cucurulo71
    @Cucurulo71 5 років тому +7

    Absolutely...it happend in Afganistan, Iran and N Korea.

    • @quetzalcoatl3242
      @quetzalcoatl3242 3 роки тому +1

      + Saudi Arabia, Israel, Honduras, Poland...

    • @igorspitz
      @igorspitz 3 роки тому

      @@quetzalcoatl3242 In Poland rape and kidnap of kids are legal now? Or the kid in a belly is considered to be a human being and thus abortion considered to be a murder. Be aware, I am not propagating any opinion on abortion. But to say that this story and anti-abortion law in Poland is the same is ridiculous. Women are not made to have sex and become pregnant in Poland.

    • @quetzalcoatl3242
      @quetzalcoatl3242 3 роки тому +3

      @@igorspitz To prohibit abortion is a way of forcing women to carry children. Margaret Atwood got inspiration from the anti-abortion laws in Europe to write her book.

    • @quetzalcoatl3242
      @quetzalcoatl3242 3 роки тому

      @@igorspitz I said Poland not only because of the abortion laws but because it has become a radical religious, racist and homophobic land. Poland in on the path to become Gilead.

    • @christianmiller9934
      @christianmiller9934 2 місяці тому

      @@igorspitzbanning abortion is forcing birth

  • @NeedtoInk
    @NeedtoInk 4 роки тому +2

    Thank you for saying "I'm worried about all the women in your life". Thank you

  • @aprilbehnke9611
    @aprilbehnke9611 5 років тому +3

    This is exactly why we need the ERA.

  • @sedentariadigital
    @sedentariadigital 4 роки тому +2

    Margaret Atwood actually said in an interview that she did not put anything in her novel that hasent happend in real live. So it is not fiction, is real, someone has lived this in one form.

  • @GabrielTheMagolorMain
    @GabrielTheMagolorMain 5 років тому +6

    Such a beautiful essay on this show. Thank you! 👏👏👏👏

  • @karinlarsen2608
    @karinlarsen2608 3 роки тому +1

    So like today's Fundamentalist LDS. Every event makes me think , 'okay she's nuts, they've pushed June too far'

  • @sassylittleprophet
    @sassylittleprophet 3 роки тому +43

    I couldn't watch The Handmaid's Tale past the first 3 or 4 episodes...I grew up in a Christian fundamentalist cult, so Gilead hits a little too close to home for me.
    There was hardly any individuality, for a time we couldn't listen to music if it had drums in it (not even if it was Christian). Our reading was very restricted, and as far as reading the Bible was concerned, we could only read from the KJV (the "true" Bible).
    AFABs could only wear skirts and dresses (because pants are "men's clothes") and nothing too short or tight (for modesty's sake, otherwise you were asking for it, but if you got r*ped or assaulted it would still be your fault for somehow leading him on). AMABs weren't allowed to wear skirts or dresses either.
    No education on gender, sexuality, or general self-expression whatsoever, in fact it's pretty much a sin to express yourself in any way and your own "fleshly" desires (because your identity is supposed to be "in Christ," and "you are bought with a price, therefore glorify God in your body and spirit which are God's"). Because "the heart is deceitful above all things and desperately wicked," you are taught not to trust your emotions or experiences, unless they line up with the Bible, or more accurately how the pastors and men interpret the Bible (which is interesting, because how can we be certain that they're preaching truth from God and not following their own wicked hearts?).
    Women are supposed to be submissive to their husbands of course, as is biblical, and child abuse is not only normal, but encouraged, as it is also technically biblical. If you don't physically "discipline" your kids, you are seen as being unfaithful to God's Word. Children are pretty much seen as little slaves and little soldiers. You're trained from young to be "in the Lord's army."
    We went to church 3 times a week and knocked on doors of people's houses to evangelise or "witness" to them, as we called it. Kids generally went to either the school provided by the church or homeschooled (I was the latter), using Christian curriculum of course. That way, the brainwashing sticks in your mind even further.
    Women are to get married (to a man of course) and to have children. Women in particular never have their own autonomy; as children they are under their father's authority, as wives they are under their husband's authority, and if they somehow don't get married or their husband dies they are under their pastor's authority. Marriages are generally arranged (or almost), and getting to marriage requires first going through the process of "courtship" (chaperoned dating, and no s*x or kissing before marriage, ever). Divorce is pretty much never an option, unless your life is in danger (even then, expect to be judged regardless, because you should've known better or seen it coming). Abortion is seen as murder, many fundamentalist Christians aren't opposed to the death penalty as the price for committing or participating in an abortion.
    And if there's an unforgivable sin, it's probably being gay. You're seen as either sick or disgusting, or mentally ill. In other words, you need some conversion therapy so God can straighten you out, in more ways than one.
    Young earth creationism, many are conspiracy theorists and antivaxxers, you get the picture which type of crowd we're dealing with.
    To summarise, the mindset behind religious extremism is terrifying, and the lengths that people will go to in the name of God can be genuinely horrifying.

    • @lifeisfun_n_diy1254
      @lifeisfun_n_diy1254 3 роки тому +13

      Eerily similar things happen under Taliban, isis, etc. The whole concept of one book from thousands of years ago governing humanity is terrifying.

    • @karinlarsen2608
      @karinlarsen2608 3 роки тому

      I pray God's love enfold you. Handmaid's Tale is a story about Victory against the oppression. If you can separate yourself from the movie, it could be very healing for you

    • @sassylittleprophet
      @sassylittleprophet 3 роки тому

      @@karinlarsen2608 I've read the book (thought it was amazing), but I couldn't watch past the 3rd or 4th episode. The mindset of Gilead is just a step or two ahead of how I was raised, and knowing that kind of brutality is that close, let's just say the show hits a little too close to home.

    • @karinlarsen2608
      @karinlarsen2608 3 роки тому +1

      Jesus said, " who the son sets free is free indeed" Let's be careful not to blame God for what man has done

    • @sassylittleprophet
      @sassylittleprophet 3 роки тому +3

      @@karinlarsen2608 ... what does that have anything to do with it? Lol that shouldn't be too hard considering I don't believe in God anymore.

  • @calvinmanio6713
    @calvinmanio6713 5 років тому +5

    This kind of thing is still happening now in other countries...

  • @semi2893
    @semi2893 Рік тому

    We're living in New Gilead right now where no one even knows what a woman is anymore.

  • @carolinelynch2823
    @carolinelynch2823 6 років тому +67

    June needs a machine gun. Or an AK 47

    • @TheTimtwnsnd
      @TheTimtwnsnd 6 років тому +11

      To fight back against tyranny hmm maybe the constitution had it right hmmm

    • @LeoBeastmode
      @LeoBeastmode 6 років тому

      ua-cam.com/video/mWwwzF3BYBw/v-deo.html

    • @LaviniaHaifa
      @LaviniaHaifa 5 років тому +1

      A tank

    • @patchess5488
      @patchess5488 5 років тому +1

      If the AK 47 is a regular variant of its self then it is a machine gun bud

    • @bunker551
      @bunker551 5 років тому +1

      @@patriciax3677 shall not be infringed is not complex no matter how much you want it to be.

  • @malooskitty9124
    @malooskitty9124 5 років тому +3

    It’s frightening and interesting that this is exactly what happened here after 1979!

    • @igorspitz
      @igorspitz 3 роки тому

      Where is here?

    • @malooskitty9124
      @malooskitty9124 3 роки тому +1

      @@igorspitz Iran

    • @the8thchurch461
      @the8thchurch461 2 роки тому

      @@malooskitty9124 AMERICA and her "churches", cults which she exports to the world.

  • @emmaothorell
    @emmaothorell 6 років тому +15

    I appreciate your analysis on a topic such as this. It's incredibly important to open peoples' eyes to what could happen in our society if we strip women of their rights. Thank you. Following.

  • @raycotter9558
    @raycotter9558 5 років тому +2

    2:26 I’m not necessarily pro Trump but I got to call bullshit when I see it, how come ye never mentioned the countries and ideologies that actually take away women’s rights.

    • @caitlin1767
      @caitlin1767 4 роки тому

      The book is set in America??

  • @SingleBeigeFemale
    @SingleBeigeFemale 5 років тому +3

    Excellent synopsis as I finally sit down to watch Season 2... thank you,

  • @kasnarfburns210
    @kasnarfburns210 4 роки тому +1

    What I find frightening is if a population was faced with widespread infertility, there's no telling what they might resort to!!! You'd think they'd look to tackle the infertility issue with science but in this series, they chose theocracy. There are characteristics of The Handmaid's Tale in many cultures today: variations on slut shaming, female genital mutilation, patriarchy, honor killings, etc.

    • @MsToniquica
      @MsToniquica 2 роки тому

      They don't it now because people are choosing not to have children

  • @seanporcelli3965
    @seanporcelli3965 6 років тому +29

    Can someone tell me what rights women have lost in the trump administration? I'm honestly confused about that.

    • @candicelittlewolf9984
      @candicelittlewolf9984 5 років тому +53

      Let me help:
      • Placing restrictions on what health insurance can cover mostly in regards to women's reproductive rights
      • Actively making attempts and passing bills that limit Planned Parenthood
      • Changing the definition of domestic abuse to only fit behaviors that you could technically be prosecuted for and
      • Passing laws that discriminate against sex workers.
      Add to these his sexist tendencies and misogynistic remarks about the women he doesn't like (i.e. attacking Hillary's appearance and the infamous "grab them by the genitals" remark) and you get someone who's throwing America's progress backwards. We don't need to be made great again when we were on our way to being far better before he took office.

    • @wendyhayes1006
      @wendyhayes1006 5 років тому +4

      Betsy de Vos changed how male college students can be protected from rape charges

    • @sammie8987
      @sammie8987 5 років тому +11

      He wants to pads a bill that says that once you start having sex you can not revoke consent. Basically if you consent to have sex in the beginning of it you can’t revoke and tell the person to stop. And he wants to push abortion laws

    • @kathrynjeanmarie6997
      @kathrynjeanmarie6997 5 років тому +4

      .None..........The parallels are their delusion........

    • @kathrynjeanmarie6997
      @kathrynjeanmarie6997 5 років тому +2

      @@sammie8987 OMG.

  • @tomtrinchera8405
    @tomtrinchera8405 4 роки тому +1

    I hope that June can rally enough women to take a collective flamethrower to the Commanders and overthrow them. Damn, this show is good.

  • @annmacam7853
    @annmacam7853 2 роки тому +3

    I like this analysis but also the story is based on the HISTORY of how african american women were treated in america. Its not just a horrible scary future; its a real horrible experience that has already happened but only to some people. America is atrocious 😭 i know bc i live here

    • @HK-gm8pe
      @HK-gm8pe 2 роки тому

      as an european woman whowas raped and stabbed Ifeel soo sorry for all the women in US, Inever want children and just a thought of goingtrough this horribly painful experience that changes my body and see my rapiss child coming out from me....I would have rather died, Iwasalsoonly 13...its soo scaryto hear that acountry Iasan european once looked as "land of the free" starts to become more like the beginning of handmaids tale,women need towakeup....nobody should EVER force birth upon a woman, likeIsaid Iwould rather die andnowUS is going to see aswell how many problems it causes

  • @darianrose2195
    @darianrose2195 3 роки тому +1

    Fiction often mirrors reality and I'll never not see the gross irony of the men who choose to hate and oppress the gender that birthed them. We are not brood mares, we are life givers.

  • @tudormiller8898
    @tudormiller8898 5 років тому +2

    If all the Muslim men on here think that treating thier women with respect is part of Islam. Then why the hell do they cover them from head to toe in the burka. Wearing the niqab ? I live in London, and I've seen Muslim women dressed like this, they can't be all tourists from Saudi Arabia.

    • @joaninha3484
      @joaninha3484 5 років тому

      Holly Abb Is it real choice though? We all of us are influenced by the culture we live in. Just a girl in the west “chooses” to shave her legs because she’s been taught that it’s attractive and attractive = aspirational, a Muslim girl may “choose” to cover because she’s been taught it shows modesty and modesty = aspirational. We are all affected by the societal norms around us so its important we make those norms as fair as possible.

  • @mizzypoo4827
    @mizzypoo4827 6 років тому +19

    The Chinese Ruling Dynasty did this before this Handmaiden Tale book,
    its a modern tale/version of the Harem system.

    • @DavidLemmo
      @DavidLemmo 5 років тому +2

      That is entirely different. The Chinese Dynasty used concubines (glorified Prostitutes, who exclusively served the high status individual who owned them). The handmaid system of Gilead is quite different. A handmaid is not the property of the man of the house, she is state property, loaned to the household so that they can bear children, despite the wife's lack of fertility. By law, any sexual activity with a handmaid outside of the ceremony, is legally adultery in the handmaid system. In the concubine/harem system, there are no such restrictions, a concubine can be used sexually at her owner's will alone but any children born to her will not be considered legitimate. A child born of a handmaid bears the status of a child born to the husband and wife within the household, and has no relation to the handmaid following weaning.

  • @kerrid.4316
    @kerrid.4316 5 років тому +1

    This is our future
    1984-Brave New World-Handmaid's Tale

  • @b0bjerrington3
    @b0bjerrington3 5 років тому +6

    This show is an excellent reminder to not give up your guns to the government. Bad things like this have and CAN happen again. This is why you need a well armed population ready to form militias if a government or shadow government ever tries to pull something remotely similar to this.

  • @bekacynthia
    @bekacynthia 5 років тому +2

    I’m in love with this series! I guess I’m addicted to pain 😬

    • @480JD
      @480JD 5 років тому

      Women naturally crave a submissive position, its hardwired in after millenia of evolution.

  • @issmo5805
    @issmo5805 6 років тому +19

    great Analysis ...............under his eye ......:D

    • @mayanderson3711
      @mayanderson3711 6 років тому +1

      Iss Mo blessed it be the fruit... loops 😁

  • @aprilstephenson3579
    @aprilstephenson3579 6 років тому +8

    Just had to throw a trump line in there. Trump is pro-capitalism, not theocracy. there's virtually no comparison

    • @arnorrian1
      @arnorrian1 5 років тому +1

      German industrialist were pro-capitalism in the 1930's too. Didn't stop them from being good Nazis.

    • @pyroshayniac1090
      @pyroshayniac1090 5 років тому

      A Trump supporting congressman just proposed a law that would give women the death penalty for having an abortion. Trumps hate speech brings his awful supporters crawling out of the woodwork like cockroaches.

    • @bunker551
      @bunker551 5 років тому +1

      @@pyroshayniac1090 Don't kill babies as hate speech?

    • @kingofcheese6147
      @kingofcheese6147 5 років тому

      Thank you

    • @JULYXXIV
      @JULYXXIV 5 років тому

      Trump is being courted by the Evangelical right because he is useful to them, a necessary evil, if you will. Arrogant and obstreperous, he’s very high-profile and can attract the masses in a way few ever could. He may be the marquee “conservative” now, but as soon as he expended his usefulness to the Christian Right, his political career is over.

  • @KB5RYE
    @KB5RYE 6 років тому +1

    The more accurate correlation is Gilead and ISIS or Boko Haram. ISIS had sex slave markets. Boko Haram has full fledged slavery as well as kidnapped Christian girls for sex slavery/forced marriage.

  • @3llevate
    @3llevate 5 років тому +4

    Anyone else saw a play on "Offered" before reading/watching the show and finding out it was "of-commander" ?

  • @kimberlyjones4015
    @kimberlyjones4015 4 роки тому

    This sentence best describes the 'The Handmaids' Tale' is 'This episode is more FUCKED up than the last.' Is my opinion but i love the show.

  • @binarlestari2497
    @binarlestari2497 6 років тому +9

    please create more video like this 👍

    • @Qiq-og6ms
      @Qiq-og6ms 6 років тому

      So sorry this show is probably the society you are living in

    • @binarlestari2497
      @binarlestari2497 6 років тому

      QiQi not really, why do you think so? hahah

    • @Qiq-og6ms
      @Qiq-og6ms 6 років тому +1

      Binar Lestari because many Islamic laws are similar to this show. For example, women or gays would face death penalty like in the show

    • @binarlestari2497
      @binarlestari2497 6 років тому +1

      QiQi I live in Indonesia which we have biggest Muslim population in the world but don't apply sharia law. That kind of laws do not apply here. Also, I choose to wear headscarf by my own choice. Sorry that media shows you Islam's image that bad. LOL

  • @lazulaufca2996
    @lazulaufca2996 4 роки тому +1

    You say orange man bad but where is the receipt that prove that where are woman losing their rights?

  • @tafaramureyi491
    @tafaramureyi491 6 років тому +77

    sharia law

    • @MrKogline
      @MrKogline 6 років тому +17

      ...or the Bible.

    • @emmaothorell
      @emmaothorell 6 років тому +18

      No. It's not religion-specific or ethnicity-specific. It's any male dominated society.

    • @jewel2318
      @jewel2318 6 років тому +13

      +Emma Olsson Thorell, it's straight from the old testament though.

    • @MrKogline
      @MrKogline 6 років тому +10

      +Julia Olivero
      Not just the old testament.
      I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet. - 1 Timothy 2:12

    • @emmaothorell
      @emmaothorell 6 років тому +2

      Julia Olivero I didn't say misogyny isn't in religion or in cultures - I said the common factor is that misogynists are men. It's not one specific religion - it's everywhere.

  • @nolansthompson8984
    @nolansthompson8984 4 роки тому +1

    What rights are women losing? You cant kill your baby?

  • @iman-mp8me
    @iman-mp8me 6 років тому +32

    everyone keeps saying “sharia law” or “Saudi Arabia” but the whole regime is based of Christian values just say you hate Muslims and go

    • @Qiq-og6ms
      @Qiq-og6ms 6 років тому +7

      Islam is somewhat borrowed from Christianity too. Muslim counties have so many similar laws like this show

    • @chantellem6457
      @chantellem6457 6 років тому +14

      iman You sound so stupid. You think it's hatred of Muslims to point out real, present problems with sharia law, ESPECIALLY in the creepily close form of sharia that Saudi Arabia takes (the handmaid's always have to be guarded by someone, can't drive, have to cover up, men own the women)? Don't you think problems that are literally happening today are a little more pressing than what's in Christian scripture? The Bible has awful parts in it but don't you care more about the real women being hurt in Sharia Law countries more than words on a page?

    • @almamater489
      @almamater489 6 років тому +6

      I hate all abrahamic religions equally
      *_leaves the comment section_*

    • @DenaInWyo
      @DenaInWyo 6 років тому

      Snake ..what Snake said. For the love of Bacon, why are women still being oppressed by the belief in mythology? I know, I am pissing into the wind to hope that will go away..but it's really what it all boils down to.

    • @manjelos
      @manjelos 5 років тому +1

      Well, I see there not much reference to Christianity, there are no crosses, there is no Christ, he is also newer mentioned. Instead we hear quotes from old testament such from Genesis...

  • @thangcong9436
    @thangcong9436 5 місяців тому

    Honestly 80% of this sound like the Matriarchy we live in now

  • @whyistherehandlesnow
    @whyistherehandlesnow 6 років тому +28

    Such a great review/analysis

  • @SavageThrifter
    @SavageThrifter 5 років тому +3

    I wish more people on the left respected and valued freedom of speech. It is our greatest freedom!

    • @debiburlingame5158
      @debiburlingame5158 5 років тому +1

      I wish more people on the right would respect the division of Church and State.... and I am a member of the Methodist Church saying that.

    • @SavageThrifter
      @SavageThrifter 5 років тому

      @@debiburlingame5158 you right you right. But honestly I see a lot of conservatives my age that do respect the division of church and state

  • @markjd4
    @markjd4 6 років тому +3

    I can see why critics draw parallels between Gilead and the modern US. But in my opinion, the regime's strict control over the use of language, i.e what one may say, and how they say it, bears more respemlance in my mind to the European Left. The show is essentially portraying state enforced Political Correctness.

  • @coanush
    @coanush 5 років тому +2

    Allegory of the current world with surrogacy.

  • @LWL1220
    @LWL1220 5 років тому +3

    Dude. This is a gentler version of how women are forced to live under Islam. American women in America? Not even close! What the hell do you think is going on over here?!

  • @kaylaelizabeth7962
    @kaylaelizabeth7962 5 років тому +1

    We read this book in school, Margaret Atwood bases Gilead off of many things that happened all throughout history

  • @pivs
    @pivs 6 років тому +9

    who deserve WAY more subcribers

  • @yvonnemaybe2853
    @yvonnemaybe2853 Рік тому

    I am reading the book right now and I get afraid, seriously concerned …
    I am thinking of founding a club of women, who are watching women’s rights…

  • @februaryschild0216
    @februaryschild0216 5 років тому +4

    It reminds me of the slave trade. The loss of identity, servitude, loss of language, uniforms, restricted education and speech... In this country it went on in some shape or form, for hundreds of years. Still, the nation has learned nothing. Tyranny is a cancer. This country was built on tyranny, and unfortunately we refuse to cut it out and irradiate it.

  • @SangAyie
    @SangAyie 4 роки тому

    some people look for answers in their religious texts, while others in fictional novels. Well everyone needs to believe in something.

  • @catdean828
    @catdean828 5 років тому +8

    not sure how our rights have been eroded... what country do you live in?

    • @mzk123ify
      @mzk123ify 5 років тому +2

      I just asked the same question....liberal propaganda....they sneak it in everywhere....

    • @the8thchurch461
      @the8thchurch461 2 роки тому

      AMERICA and the Bible belt and all the religious cults that come from there = Gilead

    • @the8thchurch461
      @the8thchurch461 2 роки тому

      @@mzk123ify AMERICA and her Bible belt and all the religious cults that come from there like Seventh Day Adventism, Jehovah's Witness, Assemblies of God e.t.c

  • @judep6077
    @judep6077 6 років тому +2

    Incredible video, enjoyed every minute.

  • @camellias.7106
    @camellias.7106 6 років тому +5

    Great content, keep it up! 💐

  • @Char-Williams
    @Char-Williams 6 років тому +3

    As long as the US is able to adopt from abroad, this will never happen, don't worry! lol

    • @kats2675
      @kats2675 6 років тому +7

      So young, and innocent!

    • @Qiq-og6ms
      @Qiq-og6ms 6 років тому +1

      You obviously have not lived aboard. As a immigrate woman, I have more freedom in US than I’d image

    • @the8thchurch461
      @the8thchurch461 2 роки тому

      @@Qiq-og6ms As an African woman, my freedom was taken from me by an AMERICAN CULT so this is closer to home.

  • @joevignolor4u949
    @joevignolor4u949 6 років тому +1

    I watched Season 1. Season 2 began with the simulated mass hanging designed to terrorize the women into submission. Staging the mock hanging inside Fenway Park went too far for me. I'm from Boston and Fenway Park is sacred ground and I found it in bad taste and very disturbing.

  • @SkepticCat-pz1zz
    @SkepticCat-pz1zz 5 років тому +3

    The title is all wrong it should be “American Sharia” or “Saudi America”

  • @iannickle8386
    @iannickle8386 5 років тому +4

    What rights have eroded? I must be missing somethinf

    • @jenniferwoo3044
      @jenniferwoo3044 5 років тому +4

      No American rights for women have eroded. It is a wonderful time to be a woman in Western society. If you missed anything, it was the biased view point of the narrator. Obviously he has a political agenda that thrives on the attention seeking behavior that victimization offers.

  • @esta1ful
    @esta1ful 5 років тому +1

    Hate that auntie

  • @carolinelynch2823
    @carolinelynch2823 6 років тому +3

    V FOR VENDETTA!!!!!

  • @waltervalle7546
    @waltervalle7546 5 років тому +7

    How in the Hell can anyone compare this to Trump's America?

    • @Jillking45
      @Jillking45 4 роки тому

      LMFAO! I couldn't believe he made that comparison!!! Considering the current ideology of the socialist democratic party! just saying

  • @kenpanderz
    @kenpanderz 6 місяців тому

    its like Antebellum but expanded

  • @donnaschnare7029
    @donnaschnare7029 5 років тому +11

    I enjoy the show but the comparison to Trump and US is complete BS.

  • @SangAyie
    @SangAyie 4 роки тому

    Every place has its form of female slavery, less develop nations where women are confined with lesser rights, while develop nations drove women to desperation with prostitution and pornography.

  • @ShezzLuvsShadow
    @ShezzLuvsShadow 5 років тому +4

    Was it really necessary to bring Trump into this? For fuck's sake...

  • @pureenergy5051
    @pureenergy5051 5 років тому

    dys·to·pi·an
    disˈtōpēən
    adjective
    1.
    relating to or denoting an imagined state or society where there is great suffering or injustice.
    "the dystopian future of a society bereft of reason"
    The Evil Federal Reserve
    By THOMAS D. SCHAUF, CPA (certified public accountant)
    Our country likes to thank our forefathers for the Constitution.
    I wish to thank Mr. Lou Gamboa for his research of the Constitution and our banking system. Lou Gamboa is a national speaker on the subject, and has spoken on numerous radio programs in an effort to educate the public. Lou is a Republican Committeeman and Treasurer of Taxpayers of Illinois.
    I also want to thank Bob Corcoran for his research and encouragement.
    I applaud the thousands of patriotic Americans who are spreading the word so we can live in economic prosperity and uphold our Constitutional rights.
    ARTICLE 1, SECTION 8 OF THE CONSTITUTION STATES THAT CONGRESS SHALL HAVE THE POWER TO COIN (CREATE) MONEY AND REGULATE THE VALUE THEREOF.
    IN 1935 THE SUPREME COURT RULED THAT CONGRESS CANNOT CONSTITUTIONALLY DELEGATE ITS POWER TO ANOTHER GROUP. (Reference 22, P. 168)
    Rothschild, a London Banker, wrote a letter saying "It (Central Bank ) gives the National Bank almost complete control of national finance. The few who understand the system will either be so interested in its profits, or so dependent on its favours, that there will be no opposition from that class... The great body of the people, mentally incapable of comprehending, will bear its burden without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical (contrary) to their interests." [The bankers created the legislation for the FED]
    In 1913, before the Senate Banking and Currency Committee, Mr. Alexander stated: "But the whole scheme of a Federal Reserve Bank with its commercial-paper basis is an impractical, cumbersome machinery, is simply a cover, to find a way to secure the privilege of issuing money and to evade payment of as much tax upon circulation as possible, and then control the issue and maintain, instead of reduce, interest rates. It is a system that, if inaugurated, will prove to the advantage of the few and the detriment of the people of the United States. It will mean continued shortage of actual money and further extension of credits; for when there is a lack of real money people have to borrow credit to their cost."

    Dear American:
    Pursuant to your request, I will attempt to clear up questions you have about the Federal Reserve Bank (FED). I spent much time researching the FED and these are the shocking and revealing conclusions.
    THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK IS A PRIVATE COMPANY. Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution states that Congress shall have the power to coin (create) money and regulate the value thereof. Today however, the FED, which is a privately owned company, controls and profits by printing money through the Treasury, and regulating its value.
    The FED began with approximately 300 people or banks that became owners (stockholders purchasing stock at $100 per share - the stock is not publicly traded) in the Federal Reserve Banking System. They make up an international banking cartel of wealth beyond comparison (Reference 1, 14). The FED banking system collects billions of dollars (Reference 8, 17) in interest annually and distributes the profits to its shareholders. The Congress illegally gave the FED the right to print money (through the Treasury) at no interest to the FED. The FED creates money from nothing, and loans it back to us through banks, and charges interest on our currency. The FED also buys Government debt with money printed on a printing press and charges U.S. taxpayers interest. Many Congressmen and Presidents say this is fraud (Reference 1,2,3,5,17).
    Who actually owns the Federal Reserve Central Banks? The ownership of the 12 Central banks, a very well kept secret, has been revealed:
    Rothschild Bank of London
    Warburg Bank of Hamburg
    Rothschild Bank of Berlin
    Lehman Brothers of New York
    Lazard Brothers of Paris
    Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
    Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
    Goldman, Sachs of New York
    Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
    Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
    (Reference 14, P. 13, Reference 12, P. 152)
    These bankers are connected to London Banking Houses which ultimately control the FED. When England lost the Revolutionary War with America (our forefathers were fighting their own government), they planned to control us by controlling our banking system, the printing of our money, and our debt (Reference 4, 22).
    The individuals listed below owned banks which in turn owned shares in the FED. The banks listed below have significant control over the New York FED District, which controls the other 11 FED Districts. These banks also are partly foreign owned and control the New York FED District Bank.
    (Reference 22)
    First National Bank of New York
    James Stillman
    National City Bank, New York
    Mary W. Harnman
    National Bank of Commerce, New York
    A.D. Jiullard
    Hanover National Bank, New York
    Jacob Schiff
    Chase National Bank, New York
    Thomas F. Ryan
    Paul Warburg
    William Rockefeller
    Levi P. Morton
    M.T. Pyne
    George F. Baker
    Percy Pyne
    Mrs. G.F. St. George
    J.W. Sterling
    Katherine St. George
    H.P. Davidson
    J.P. Morgan (Equitable Life/Mutual Life)
    Edith Brevour T. Baker
    (Reference 4 for above, Reference 22 has details, P. 92, 93, 96, 179)
    How did it happen? After previous attempts to push the Federal Reserve Act through Congress, a group of bankers funded and staffed Woodrow Wilson's campaign for President. He had committed to sign this act. In 1913, a Senator, Nelson Aldrich, maternal grandfather to the Rockefellers, pushed the Federal Reserve Act through Congress just before Christmas when much of Congress was on vacation (Reference 3, 4, 5). When elected, Wilson passed the FED. Later, Wilson remorsefully replied (referring to the FED), "I have unwittingly ruined my country" (Reference 17, P. 31). Now the banks financially back sympathetic candidates. Not surprisingly, most of these candidates are elected (Reference 1, P. 208-210, Reference 12, P. 235, Reference 14, P. 36). The bankers employ members of the Congress on weekends (nickname T&T club -out Thursday...-in Tuesday) with lucrative salaries (Reference 1, P. 209). Additionally, the FED started buying up the media in the 1930's and now owns or significantly influences most of it
    (Reference 3, 10, 11, P. 145).
    Presidents Lincoln, Jackson, and Kennedy tried to stop this family of bankers by printing U.S. dollars without charging the taxpayers interest (Reference 4). Today, if the government runs a deficit, the FED prints dollars through the U.S. Treasury, buys the debt, and the dollars are circulated into the economy. In 1992, taxpayers paid the FED banking system $286 billion in interest on debt the FED purchased by printing money virtually cost free (Reference 12, P. 265). Forty percent of our personal federal income taxes goes to pay this interest. The FED's books are not open to the public. Congress has yet to audit it.
    Congressman Wright Patman was Chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on Banking and Currency for 40 years. For 20 of those years, he introduced legislation to repeal the Federal Reserve Banking Act of 1913. Congressman Henry Gonzales, Chairman of a banking committee, introduces legislation to repeal the Federal Reserve Banking Act of 1913 nearly every year. It's always defeated, the media remains silent, and the public never learns the truth. The same bankers who own the FED control the media and give huge political contributions to sympathetic members of Congress (Reference 12, P. 155-163, Reference 22, P. 158, 159, 166). THE FED FEARS THE POPULATION WILL BECOME AWARE OF THIS FRAUD AND DEMAND CHANGE. We, the People, are at fault for being passive and allowing this to continue.
    continued

    • @pureenergy5051
      @pureenergy5051 5 років тому

      @Diana OG
      So you don't want to know who has taken over the world with their fascist corporations that Ralph Nader and others have been talking about for a long, long time? Before Hitler took over, people thought everything was just fine.
      And yes, the Christ within us needs to say something, not be quiet or subdued.
      That being said, there are 7,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 spinning atoms that people consist of. Each one consists of protons and neutrons and electrons. Protons and neutrons consist of 3 points of light spinning at high rates of speed. The electron consists of 1 point of light spinning/vibrating at a high rate of speed. People consist totally 100% as spinning, vibrating light. That is it. There is nothing solid, physical, material, or mass anywhere at any time. This is the information people need to know to heal themselves of the belief in death. The belief in death is why there are wars and prisons and racism to begin with.

  • @susannegriffin8323
    @susannegriffin8323 5 років тому +6

    The comparison to the Trump administration is the biggest pile of crap I’ve heard in a very long time.

    • @thepapistyourmotherwarnedy752
      @thepapistyourmotherwarnedy752 5 років тому +2

      Thank God someone else said this, Gilead is closer to Saudi Arabia and North Korea than anything

    • @masterskweex
      @masterskweex 5 років тому +2

      Susanne Griffin I was watching and enjoying then I heard the trump comparison... oh here we go again... of course this HAD to be political... smh

  • @khrisscortez
    @khrisscortez 5 років тому

    In a nutshell, that is the Genesis customs/culture, but in 2020.

  • @sargonofassyria1505
    @sargonofassyria1505 6 років тому +8

    Oh yeah this is exactly like women under sharia law in Islam..

  • @contrarymary7638
    @contrarymary7638 5 років тому +1

    For evil to succeed, all it needs is for good men to do nothing.
    -Martin Luther King Jr.
    Good people stand by and do nothing within the family setting, a job setting or societal and global setting.
    We all have a duty to teach the young people to stand up and be counted to stand up and speak up There are more good people on this earth than evil The good can outweigh the evil in this world.
    This group mentality power and control starts within the family setting often amongst siblings with the endorsement or apathy of the parents. Domestic abuse even now, approaching 2020 is a topic that people are still only becoming aware of for example there's not just domestic violence there is much more types of domestic abuse the emotional financial spiritual and the coercive controlling abuse. These often start within family settings between parent-child or siblings against siblings.
    Power and control of the roman catholic church and the fallout from that Some of which we still have not even discussed in public For example the abuses of priests against children is out there in the media now. What isn't but I'm sure is under the surface is the more damaging emotional abuse of some of the disempowered parents within the Roman Catholic faith who were told by their children what was going on but ignored due to the hierarchy, prestige and power the Roman Catholic Church held at the time.
    The general abuses that go on amongst families is still relatively unknown other than sexual and physical abuse but they're coercive emotional psychological and spiritual abuse has yet to be openly acknowledged explored and discussed
    Sadly a lot of people turn away pretend they didn't see, pretend they didn't hear, for an easy life. They may not want to take sides of worry they will be seen as taking sides with friends colleagues.
    The personal is political

  • @Brickjitsu
    @Brickjitsu 6 років тому +3

    Honest question: How have women's rights been eroded under Trump? I get that the guy is an ass, but what policies or legislation has he gone after to oppress women? I think I'm missing something important.

  • @clivegoodman16
    @clivegoodman16 5 років тому +1

    How is Trump's America, anything like the Republic of Gilead as described in the Handmaid's Tale?

  • @valkyriesardo278
    @valkyriesardo278 5 років тому +3

    What frightens me most about this tale is the author. It is depressing to think a grown woman could hold so naive a perspective of humanity as to render it down to such flat stereotypes. She must have lived in a bell jar all her days. That is only cautionary tale I see here.

    • @hannahwoods573
      @hannahwoods573 4 роки тому +1

      The message
      ______________
      Your head

    • @lolll3360
      @lolll3360 3 роки тому

      This literally happens in North Korea 🤦

  • @meredith3415
    @meredith3415 4 роки тому +5

    Can someone tell me how women's rights have been "eroding" since Trump was elected? LOL how?

    • @rodneyridley8403
      @rodneyridley8403 4 роки тому

      That quote floord me as well smh

    • @Jillking45
      @Jillking45 4 роки тому

      he was self projecting his socialist left ideology!

    • @fairydust22002
      @fairydust22002 3 роки тому

      @@Jillking45 good for him!

  • @holistic_memory404
    @holistic_memory404 3 роки тому

    And kimkardashan is allowed to borrow womb just because she have money ..... and doesn’t want to stretch her belly ...... this is just a parallel of our time...

  • @robtrousdale7039
    @robtrousdale7039 5 років тому +8

    Dude you need to stop watching CNN and MSNBC damn, get your testosterone checked

  • @crazysquirrel9425
    @crazysquirrel9425 3 роки тому

    Genesis 3:16, Ephesians 5:22,23 and 1Timothy2 all come to mind.

  • @johnyzero2000
    @johnyzero2000 6 років тому +14

    Please give me some examples have women's rights have been eroding since Trump got elected? So far women can still get an abortion at Planned Parenthood or any women's clinic providing they be pregnant as of 2018.

    • @jeannemshultz9136
      @jeannemshultz9136 6 років тому +11

      You re...what? trolling for fun? A member of Trolling For Dollars? Piss off, troll.

    • @evaalvarado1020
      @evaalvarado1020 6 років тому +7

      How about instead of calling someone who disagrees with you a troll, you engage in a discussion? The burden of proof lies on the person making the claim, he is merely questioning it.
      Ffs, this is why Trump won. Emotional children who refuse to engage in a productive conversation. To answer your question, John, the recent gag rule bill would be one. Though to be fair, the government has been restricting women's rights before the Trump administration: www.guttmacher.org/article/2016/07/laws-affecting-reproductive-health-and-rights-state-trends-midyear-2016

    • @chantellem6457
      @chantellem6457 6 років тому +4

      JeanneM Shultz It seemed like a genuine question. I'd also like to know which rights were being taken away. You just look ridiculous crying 'troll!!!' when being politely asked for an example.

    • @elinapoznaka6484
      @elinapoznaka6484 6 років тому

      Google is free

    • @chantellem6457
      @chantellem6457 6 років тому +1

      Elīna Pozņaka So, no answer then.

  • @Qubic-lg2vq
    @Qubic-lg2vq 6 років тому +1

    I want you to please elaborate. What rights have woman lost since Trump ? You can't just throw that out there and expect people to just take it like it's a fact.

  • @Kat-te6gs
    @Kat-te6gs 6 років тому +46

    Yeah stop comparing this to trump. He's taken away no right and enflicted any others.

    • @Kat-te6gs
      @Kat-te6gs 6 років тому +4

      Why make it about race or gender? Youre right. He wants to make it better for americans. And he is making it worse for illegal imagrants. Problem solved.

    • @florianrothe4066
      @florianrothe4066 6 років тому

      Yvonne Juju i don't Trumps political opinion and I think this men is crazy, but when did he say this?

    • @Kat-te6gs
      @Kat-te6gs 6 років тому

      Florian Rothe Listen you the beginning

    • @florianrothe4066
      @florianrothe4066 6 років тому

      Shay Flaherty ?

    • @ednamac5186
      @ednamac5186 6 років тому +1

      Shay Flaherty they will find anything to tie to Trump. Trump 2020! BTW I am not white.

  • @losangeles1973
    @losangeles1973 3 роки тому

    This film is a copy of what happened in Iran in 1979 where women lost their rights overnight. For over 40 years women are subjected to torture and stoning in Iran by the clerics.