the conclusion implies that after Keshwanand Bharti case Amendments cannot be challenged as a Law even if it is inconsistent with Fundamental rights ???
Hi Amit! The conclusion is that Amendments cannot be violative of the Basic Structure of the Constitution : the Narain case which said that if Amendments are violative of FRs, they can can be challenged! Hope this helps!
@@_FinologyLegalYes now its clear , that after 24th amendment , the Parliament amended the meaning of law to exclude the power of judicial review . , , But the court then evolved a new doctrine of Basic structure to review the amendments also .even if it not a law . . . thanks Ms Priya and your team of Finology , , , Doing great . . . kindly also incorporate that points which deals with observation of Court . . , regarding law in ordinary sense , and constitutional law (in exercise of constitutional power ) . furthermore i request to kindly make some clips on Administrative laws also .
@@_FinologyLegal the fundamental rights can be amended but that amendment must be reasonable. The supreme court will decide whether the amendment is reasonable or abitrary I.e whether it alters the basic structure or not.
Simplicity at its best 🙌 Other students guys I have watched almost all her videos n they are must watch not only for upsc but even llb students this video is more than enough to clarify ur concept 🙌🙌Miss Priya thanks a lot for your efforts . . Should say one of the best youtube channel to learn indian constitution 🙌❤️💕🙏🙏🙏💐
@@_FinologyLegal Respected mam, I want to join ur online course (paid course) and I want to purchase study material can u share ur contact details. Thank you
I choose Geography as my optional for upsc After your lectures I feel like to change my optional to Polity.... You made Polity such interesting🙂 Thanks didi
Whether Personal laws come under the definition of laws and laws in force is an debatable issue. In this regard, the most leading case is State of Bombay vs Narasu Appa Mali in which case, the Bombay High Court (Justices MC Chagla and Gajendragadkar) held that Personal laws do not come under the purview of Article 13. In Sri Krishna Singh vs Mathura Ahir case, the Supreme Court also stated the same. But the Sabarimala and Triple talaq judgments of Supreme Court, the validity of those rulings came into question. Justice Chandrachud in Sabarimala judgment though without specifically overruling those preceding rulings held those rulings flawed and not maintainable. Therefore, even though officially Personal laws are not included in Article 13(3) as the preceding rulings are yet to be overruled, the Sabarimala and Triple talaq judgments have set different rulings.
Even after a repeated revisions of Laxmikant,still I've no concept clarity...but by viewing Ur lectures....it's fill all the lacunae regarding contitutional knowhows.... seriously grt command u have....pls make some more videos on parliamentary committees,budgeting,,centre state relation.n all one IAS aspirant needs to earn gud scores at polity section..pls mam I request.
Mind blowing mam!! Unbelievable...your knowledge, explanation,teaching skill, your voice and enegy level....all are wonder..I really became your biggest fan..Love u mam
Of myriad videos available on the subject F. L. videos come across as most useful and meaningful. In short but effective, to the point videos you cover all vital points on the issue being discussed. It is a pleasure to listen to you speak, Priyaji.
I have request to you guyss kindly come with all the laws and topics on YOUR youtube channel as not every person can register on our website and study and she is going so great and very helpful to understand easily
Today I see your UA-cam channel and firstly I subscribe your channel then I see all your video....thanks allot for this help. I also see your team .. Keep it on .. your group are so effective.
While reading these articles or going through laxmikant I found that language too tough... And here you are explaining with this ease its really appreciable.... Ma'am please explain all this concept with accordance to laxmikant... There is not a single video available on that book like this. Thanks for teaching us... Long live 🙏🙏🙏
Pls upload ur vdos in English.. Or lse provide Eng captions. It will help too many of us.. Tq.. I like ur lecture skills.. The way u lecturing is simple nd worthful.. So try to make it in English..
At 01.44, the subtitle is given as "Whether an Amendment of the Constitution Amounts to 'Law' under Article 13(2)". But, the "LAW" is defined under Article 13(3) and not (2) right? Delighted to see such an informative video. But I feel the video should have concluded clearing the possibilities of amendments in constitution inconsistent with FR. I mean, I'm sure concluding that Keshavanand Bharati case stated Amendments cannot be challenged under article 13 have filled many with doubts. I was blank yesterday & I just noticed the answers for that in the comment section. Thank you Priya and Team Finology legal.
priya Didi you teach us constitution very well. But we did not found your vidios on all the article's of the constitution. DIDI PLEASE make vidios on ALL the ARTICLES of CONSTITUTION. SPECIALLY ON ARTICLE 310AND 311
Video is so good and informative.. I like your teaching style ..but you forget to mention about basic structure in keshavanand bharti case . It was said that constitution amendment is not void even if it violate fundamental rights but it could not effect the basic structure of the constitution. The court held that under Article 368 Parliament is not empowered to amend the basic structure.
Hii priya mam ur explanation is simply superb .....but can u plz make a video to explain the words such as ordinance, order, bye law , rule , regulation , notification, custom....
Wow great explanation.. Ur each and every video is worth watching. You have made things so easy nd crystal clear to understand.. Thank you priya 🙏🙂 Regards 🙏🌸
Miss priya you said that there are exeption of 1st instructions and guidlines by administration and executive body and 2nd is personal laws but in article 13clause3(a) it is said that the terms '' customs'' is also included
I urgently need the video for article 25,26,27,28,29,30,32.... as i have my exams from the second week of december and your videos are really helping also my whole college watches your videos.... and not only me, all of us need videos on these articles. So if you can make videos on these articles it will be a great help... and kindly keep in mind my exam date it's second week of december 2019.
But in Keshavnanda Bharati Case, the doctrine of Basic Structure hasbeen evolved. This means we can challenge the amendments and if the amendments are violative of doctrine of basic structure, they are made null and void. So my que is how we can challenge the amendments if not through Art 13( as clause 4 doesnt allow that)? Nice video💛💛 Well explained!
Thanks dude... I was in problem from 3 months.. That if FR cannot be taken away at any conditions as these are the rights to live with dignity ,happily and led a free life. And no one can take it from us. But then, i have read article 368 that fundamental rights can be taken away by parliament with special majority.. Then, again i was in problem as Article 13 says that any law that will derogrlate the FR of any citizen ,that will be void. But now i am able to understand that yes.. Article 13 will save our fundamental right against its derrogation but if parliament amends it using 368 with special majority i.e 2/3 rd , they can abridge FR too.. Have you made the video about Right to property?
Ma'am can u plz explain it in English or else please add English subtitles so that it will make more clear on the concept ..... Apart from that u r explanation is very good and thank u for better explanation it helped a lot to me
Kesavananda Bharati case’s judgment, the Supreme Court of India can review the Constitutional Amendment Act passed by the Parliament under Article 368 and can declare the same unconstitutional if such amendments are found inconsistence with the doctrine of Basic Structure Principle.
Hi Priya , contradictory with the final conclusion in this video . The Article 13(1) says that any law inconsistent with Fundamental rights shall be invalid. but the the twenty-fourth Amendment Act that inserted Article 13(4) in the constitution. By this amendment, the Parliament brought fundamental rights under the umbrella of the parts of the constitution that can be amended. The inserted article 13(4) says, “Nothing in this Article shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution made under Article 368.” in d sense , as u said we cant ask Govt or SC about FR under A.13(4) and A368 , post this 24th amendment , Keshavananda Bharti case Happened and Apex court ruled that any constitutional amendment cannot violate the Basic Structure of the constitution. This now acts as a check to the previously plenary powers that the Parliament enjoyed. It Means IT CAN BE CHALLENGED EVEN IF THERE IS ARTICLE TO NOT QUESTION , IF AND ONLY IF IT VIOLATES THE BASIC STRUCTRE OF FR. ISN'T IT ?
the conclusion implies that after Keshwanand Bharti case Amendments cannot be challenged as a Law even if it is inconsistent with Fundamental rights ???
Hi Amit!
The conclusion is that Amendments cannot be violative of the Basic Structure of the Constitution : the Narain case which said that if Amendments are violative of FRs, they can can be challenged!
Hope this helps!
@@_FinologyLegalYes now its clear , that after 24th amendment , the Parliament amended the meaning of law to exclude the power of judicial review . , , But the court then evolved a new doctrine of Basic structure to review the amendments also .even if it not a law . . .
thanks Ms Priya and your team of Finology , , , Doing great . . . kindly also incorporate that points which deals with observation of Court . . , regarding law in ordinary sense , and constitutional law (in exercise of constitutional power ) .
furthermore i request to kindly make some clips on Administrative laws also .
Thank you so much for your Feedback!
Sure I will make videos on Admin Law!
@@_FinologyLegal the fundamental rights can be amended but that amendment must be reasonable. The supreme court will decide whether the amendment is reasonable or abitrary I.e whether it alters the basic structure or not.
Mast clarification Mam ji
She and Ganesh Poojari only TEACH others ONLY TRANSLATE.
YOU ARE THE BEST TEACHER ...MAKING CONCEPT CLEAR AND EASY .
Hi Priya ji. This is just an appreciation comment. You are a fabulous teacher . Best wishes!!
Your way of explaining shows depth of your knowledge...thanks for the video.
Simplicity at its best 🙌
Other students guys I have watched almost all her videos n they are must watch not only for upsc but even llb students this video is more than enough to clarify ur concept 🙌🙌Miss Priya thanks a lot for your efforts . . Should say one of the best youtube channel to learn indian constitution 🙌❤️💕🙏🙏🙏💐
Thank you so much for writing this comment! 😊😊😊
@@_FinologyLegal Respected mam, I want to join ur online course (paid course) and I want to purchase study material can u share ur contact details.
Thank you
U r best teacher Mam 🙏🏻
I choose Geography as my optional for upsc
After your lectures I feel like to change my optional to Polity.... You made Polity such interesting🙂
Thanks didi
Whether Personal laws come under the definition of laws and laws in force is an debatable issue. In this regard, the most leading case is State of Bombay vs Narasu Appa Mali in which case, the Bombay High Court (Justices MC Chagla and Gajendragadkar) held that Personal laws do not come under the purview of Article 13. In Sri Krishna Singh vs Mathura Ahir case, the Supreme Court also stated the same. But the Sabarimala and Triple talaq judgments of Supreme Court, the validity of those rulings came into question. Justice Chandrachud in Sabarimala judgment though without specifically overruling those preceding rulings held those rulings flawed and not maintainable. Therefore, even though officially Personal laws are not included in Article 13(3) as the preceding rulings are yet to be overruled, the Sabarimala and Triple talaq judgments have set different rulings.
Maa'm aap bahut achcha pdhaty ho. Ek dam concept clear ho jata h
Thank u mam your all classes is very helpful for me to score good marks in my law exams
Even after a repeated revisions of Laxmikant,still I've no concept clarity...but by viewing Ur lectures....it's fill all the lacunae regarding contitutional knowhows.... seriously grt command u have....pls make some more videos on parliamentary committees,budgeting,,centre state relation.n all one IAS aspirant needs to earn gud scores at polity section..pls mam I request.
Thank you mam.. jo achi achi books na kar paye wo sb apne kr dikhaya.. sb smjh aa jata h.. thnk u so much
Most welcome!
Thank you so much for explaining in detail manner. all clear Article 13 and sub sections !!
Glad it was helpful!
I m really thankful for this video...
Dimaag k bhuusa ho gya tha , iss article mai...
Thanks alot ❤️
You and your teachings is amazing you make things so simple. Hatsoff 👍🏻👍🏻
Amazing explanation mam 🙏 thank you so much on behalf of all Law Students ❤️
Mind blowing mam!! Unbelievable...your knowledge, explanation,teaching skill, your voice and enegy level....all are wonder..I really became your biggest fan..Love u mam
Priya Maam,
Thank you so much for so much efforts. I really find it very easy to understand things the way you explain.
Glad to hear that!
Of myriad videos available on the subject F. L. videos come across as most useful and meaningful. In short but effective, to the point videos you cover all vital points on the issue being discussed. It is a pleasure to listen to you speak, Priyaji.
Marvelous explanation...
Apki topics ko relate krne k power awesome h....
you are divine of constitution mam
Your way of teaching is very excellent
Wooww i have never seen a teacher like her . Blessings maam u helped me a lot in this lockdown . Thanks a lot
Your teaching style is so impressive and easy to understand and you looks very smart... Thanks for your awareness cum guidance...
Mam apke lecture excellent hote hair ekhi lecture miss Nahi Karti Mai thanks na lot article 13pura samaj me Ayaa
Ur all lectures just Amazing Mam..thanks Alot god bless
Thanks a lot.
Really excellent command of supersonic Mig 29 speed. Fantastic. U r the future of Indian Juduciary
Grip over the subject is tremendous. Well balanced clarity of language, u r the motive force for all students students community as a whole.
Thanks mam, very helpful video, and ur voice is so sweet....
I couldn't understand hindi but with the help of subtitles i am able to understand.. jut like for part 1
I have just started to read about constitution nd found it interesting......thank you mam
your videos are so helpful
Tq for helping fr us and ur very good and successful lawyer in ur life may God bless uuuu
All the best
Tq my dr frnd reply I thought ur busy but ur also like me gud
I have request to you guyss kindly come with all the laws and topics on YOUR youtube channel as not every person can register on our website and study and she is going so great and very helpful to understand easily
Today I see your UA-cam channel and firstly I subscribe your channel then I see all your video....thanks allot for this help.
I also see your team ..
Keep it on .. your group are so effective.
IMPRESSIVE WAY OF TEACHING
Excellent video Maam. You have made everything super simple!
Thankyou!
Prefect explanation ma'am
Ma'am I can easily understand your lectures thanks ma'am ❤️❤️
No bindhi no compliment , i know that doesn't matters to you even,😊 thanks for the class. Nice explanation.
Thank you didi for clarifying my doubts 🥺🥺🥰
I have constitution law ka exam tomorrow and ur videos are helping me a lot!!❤️❤️❤️
All the best for your exam!
@@_FinologyLegal thank u😄
mam your video helped me a lot👏👏
maam you are a life saver
One can not challenge amendment under 368 on basis of Article 13 but Supreme Court holds it's power of Judicial Review as the Guardian of FR.
thank you for making such beautiful explanation videos which helps a lot for understanding a concept.
While reading these articles or going through laxmikant I found that language too tough... And here you are explaining with this ease its really appreciable....
Ma'am please explain all this concept with accordance to laxmikant... There is not a single video available on that book like this.
Thanks for teaching us... Long live 🙏🙏🙏
Glad to hear that.
Makes sense, I watch one video about european article 13 and now my recommended has reached India's article 13
Very clear explanation. Useful for even layman. Your new subscriber ☺️
You are really genius mam....
Once again thank you mam💐👍
hey sister; India proud of u.... Thanks
Madam Why don't u give full lecture on Indian polity for UPSC . Your way of teaching is very good ...
Love the way you simplify the things 😍 huge respect 🙏🏻
Mam your lectures are so good
Ek dam beautiful teaching madam 👌👌👆 ♥️♥️
Kesavananda Bharati India untold story for Supremacy judicial and Parliament
Pls upload ur vdos in English.. Or lse provide Eng captions. It will help too many of us.. Tq.. I like ur lecture skills.. The way u lecturing is simple nd worthful.. So try to make it in English..
Thank you for all these video, helping me a lot. Keep up your positivity and Helping nature. Best Wishes 😊😊😊
Thankyou!
Very good. Please keep it up
Thanks for the knowledge
At 01.44, the subtitle is given as "Whether an Amendment of the Constitution Amounts to 'Law' under Article 13(2)". But, the "LAW" is defined under Article 13(3) and not (2) right?
Delighted to see such an informative video. But I feel the video should have concluded clearing the possibilities of amendments in constitution inconsistent with FR. I mean, I'm sure concluding that Keshavanand Bharati case stated Amendments cannot be challenged under article 13 have filled many with doubts. I was blank yesterday & I just noticed the answers for that in the comment section.
Thank you Priya and Team Finology legal.
priya Didi you teach us constitution very well. But we did not found your vidios on all the article's of the constitution.
DIDI PLEASE make vidios on ALL the ARTICLES of CONSTITUTION.
SPECIALLY ON ARTICLE 310AND 311
Tomorrow exam,,, and you saved me today
u r just amazing mam ,
we enjoyed ur lectures ,,,lots of love mam ❤️
Glad to hear that.
Thank you ma'am
Love yr lecture truly awesome🥇🏆🤝👏👸💝
Video is so good and informative.. I like your teaching style ..but you forget to mention about basic structure in keshavanand bharti case . It was said that constitution amendment is not void even if it violate fundamental rights but it could not effect the basic structure of the constitution. The court held that under Article 368 Parliament is not empowered to amend the basic structure.
Mem how easily you teach such complex things .😊
Hii priya mam ur explanation is simply superb .....but can u plz make a video to explain the words such as ordinance, order, bye law , rule , regulation , notification, custom....
Excellent mam
Love your simple way of teaching.. thank you ☺️☺️
Really a good lecture made understand very easy in a simple way.. going forward we plead to u to upload more videos. Nice very helpful
Super mam became fan for u and ur class from Bangalore... ☺
Thank you! 😊😊
Wow great explanation..
Ur each and every video is worth watching.
You have made things so easy nd crystal clear to understand..
Thank you priya 🙏🙂
Regards 🙏🌸
Thank you for explaining it so easily 👍🏼
You have made my life easy thank you soo much♥️
Glad to hear that! ☺️
Nicely executed in the simplest form without leaving any loopholes. Thanks .
Miss priya you said that there are exeption of 1st instructions and guidlines by administration and executive body and 2nd is personal laws but in article 13clause3(a) it is said that the terms '' customs'' is also included
Great
Thanks 💖
I urgently need the video for article 25,26,27,28,29,30,32.... as i have my exams from the second week of december and your videos are really helping also my whole college watches your videos.... and not only me, all of us need videos on these articles.
So if you can make videos on these articles it will be a great help... and kindly keep in mind my exam date it's second week of december 2019.
But in Keshavnanda Bharati Case, the doctrine of Basic Structure hasbeen evolved. This means we can challenge the amendments and if the amendments are violative of doctrine of basic structure, they are made null and void.
So my que is how we can challenge the amendments if not through Art 13( as clause 4 doesnt allow that)?
Nice video💛💛 Well explained!
Thanks dude...
I was in problem from 3 months..
That if FR cannot be taken away at any conditions as these are the rights to live with dignity ,happily and led a free life. And no one can take it from us.
But then, i have read article 368 that fundamental rights can be taken away by parliament with special majority..
Then, again i was in problem as Article 13 says that any law that will derogrlate the FR of any citizen ,that will be void.
But now i am able to understand that yes..
Article 13 will save our fundamental right against its derrogation but if parliament amends it using 368 with special majority i.e 2/3 rd , they can abridge FR too..
Have you made the video about Right to property?
Mam aap aur padha dijiye ! Further articles coz upsc asking exact constitutional provisions these days
Sure
Good work
Thanks
One humble request, madam, please give a seperate class in English also.
thanks for the amazing explanation, can give more details about the article 13(3)
Very nice clearification mam..
Too good ma'am 🙂
U r superb sis keep making such videos they are very helpful 👍☺️
Ma'am can u plz explain it in English or else please add English subtitles so that it will make more clear on the concept ..... Apart from that u r explanation is very good and thank u for better explanation it helped a lot to me
Your lecture is to good and superb
Madam aap aapki tarah bahut accha padate ho
Kesavananda Bharati case’s judgment, the Supreme Court of India can review the Constitutional Amendment Act passed by the Parliament under Article 368 and can declare the same unconstitutional if such amendments are found inconsistence with the doctrine of Basic Structure Principle.
Yes!
Informative and helpful , Thank you mam.
Mam smjha mai zyada kuch nhi aaya lakin aap bolte hue bade achhe lag rhe the pehli baar koi bolta hua itna achha laga mujhe 😁🤗
Amazing teacher.
Thanks u clear my whole doubt.
Hi ... thankyou for teaching us concepts. Plz help us in teaching polity thoroghly
Hi Priya , contradictory with the final conclusion in this video .
The Article 13(1) says that any law inconsistent with Fundamental rights shall be invalid.
but the the twenty-fourth Amendment Act that inserted Article 13(4) in the constitution. By this amendment, the Parliament brought fundamental rights under the umbrella of the parts of the constitution that can be amended. The inserted article 13(4) says, “Nothing in this Article shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution made under Article 368.”
in d sense , as u said we cant ask Govt or SC about FR under A.13(4) and A368 , post this 24th amendment , Keshavananda Bharti case Happened and Apex court ruled that any constitutional amendment cannot violate the Basic Structure of the constitution. This now acts as a check to the previously plenary powers that the Parliament enjoyed. It Means IT CAN BE CHALLENGED EVEN IF THERE IS ARTICLE TO NOT QUESTION , IF AND ONLY IF IT VIOLATES THE BASIC STRUCTRE OF FR.
ISN'T IT ?
Hi Venkatesh!
You are absolutely right 🙂
Kindly refer to the pinned comment for elaborate discussion!
@@_FinologyLegal got it ... u were explaining only in terms of what section meant in written format...
r u in twitter ? mine is @VenkatAthreya1