"As soon as men decide that all means are permitted to fight an evil, then their good becomes indistinguishable from the evil that they set out to destroy." -Christopher Dawson
Ah, yes, let's listen to a man who never fought evil about how we're supposed to take higher risks in order to avoid his entitled ass calling us the baddies. Also, quite ironic since his good way to wage war was the way his father fought, sitting in trenches and throwing bodies at machine guns...
I like the lyrics "stand up and show me your face"; it makes a very good point. If a man truly believes God is on his side, even to the point that he will kill the helpless, why would such a man hide his face? There is no account of Ishmael being deceptive in his actions. Au contraire - Ishmael by all accounts, Biblical or otherwise, looked his friends and foes in the eye. If God truly takes your side, I propose that stealth is unnecessary, for honesty and truth are highly valued in heaven. Deceit and lies, on the other hand, are fathered by the Devil.
True. If God really takes your side, he will give you courage and smartness to overcome the enemy. If his goal is really justified by heaven, he shouldn't be afraid to show his face.
***** Well, to be fair civilians pay their taxes, generate production, and have the potential to become soldiers for the state. That makes them no less of a resource than a gold mine, farm, or bomb. So, civilians are just as legitimate a target in war as an oil field if your sole intent is to destroy the resources of your enemy. But that is not the only reason why the public executions are taking place. They are making these things public so the local, and foreign, populations understand that ISIS is in control of those areas. This is done because it is only the lawful government, or those that the lawful government delegates it's authority to, that has the right to take the life of one of it's citizens (criminal executions being an example). It is, I agree, cruel. But it is not ignorant; they know exactly what they are accomplishing when they hold their public executions. If they were ignorant ISIS would never have gotten to where it is now. This kind of violence, in one form or another, has been the bread and butter method for new Arab States to emerge ever since the Turkish empire fragmented. President Bush did the world a grave disfavor when he took the unnecessary step of removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and assassinating his sons. Now there is nothing to be done except wait out the chaos and see who emerges victorious. I doubt it will be ISIS, but eventually a native Arab State will appear that has the necessary military & political strength to restore order using ruthless oppression to suppress all dissenters capable of causing trouble.
***** It is an accepted fact that it is better to wound a soldier than to kill him, yes? Well, how much more so to cause harm to a civilian population? Majority of civilians contribute, in some fashion, to the welfare of the State. Even if just by existing as a consumer or manual laborer. Killing or wounding and, especially, displacing civilians hurts the ability of the opposition to resist your own efforts. Civilians who are injured or become refugees clog roads, overflow hospitals and shelters, and force governments to spend time and resources needed for the war effort trying to aid the refugees or repair devastated civilian infrastructure. Bringing the war to the "civilian" front also accelerates war fatigue - it was this very thing, the desire of the civilians in the North for peace, that almost allowed the South to win the US Civil War in 1864; and it was only when the North took the war to the civilians in the South (when Sherman pillaged and burned his way to the sea) that brought that conflict to a timely conclusion. In Vietnam it was not the VC or NVN that defeated the US - it was the war fatigue of the civilian populace. In addition, most soldiers have two loyalties; one to the State and one to the Family. As long as their families are safe they will endure great hardships on behalf of the State because they will be able to reason with themselves that their sacrifice secures the fates of the ones they love. However, if their Family is not safe, then they become demoralized and will often attempt to desert, surrender, or even mutiny because, with most men, the loyalty to the Family is stronger than the loyalty to the State. By targeting the Family you target the heart of the opposing soldiers, weaken the resolve of the civilian population to wage war, and thereby increase the pressure on the Threat leadership to seek a peace. There is nothing inherently wrong with targeting civilians - because it is the civilians that enable war to take place; without them the military would not exist because the military exists to protect, or impose the will of, the civilians. I believe ISIS is in error - but only because they are creating a situation wherein they cannot survive the post-war peace (assuming they win) because they are sowing the seeds for a counter-revolution. But I digress; to sum it up - war is not possible without civilian support in one form or another; therefore civilians are never "innocent". Indeed, civilians are the primary perpetrators of war in our modern age because the countries most often involved in war are run by civilian leadership, elected or appointed, from amidst the civilian population.
I am just going to give you the benefit of the doubt and say you are American. But Islam has changed, numerous times. After Muhammad’s death, there was a schism between who his heir as leader of the faith would be, leading to the formation of Shia and Sunni Islam. Briefly during the Middle Ages, Islam was unified especially during the crusade. During this time, knowledge was held to be the sight of god, taking inspiration from Socratic philosophy and Jewish thought. This golden age was an age were medical advances, scientific achievements and any idea that furthered humanity was not scene as heretical but as part of Allah’s will. This golden age that held out during the crusades, helped inspire the European reinassance, with people like Copernicus, Galeo and Da Vinci, taking inspiration from Islamic science and art. It was only during the rise and fall the Ottoman Empire that this idea of extremism took over. Many of these terroists groups started out as politically driven and gained a religious meaning over time. The Taliban for example, started as a anti soviet movment, before it the leaders began to use Religous idolatry as a rallying cry. This evil you speak off however has always existed. Just not nessicarly in Islam always, but in man. We humans as a species are an evil force. Hell is not below us, it’s in our cities, in our souls and in our lives.
Hurt Locker is US military slang from the Viet Nam campaign. Being put in it generally refers to being hit by something bad, such as explosives. "Johnny got hit by an IED last night, he got put in the hurt locker." It is also the title of a poem by Brian Turner, a war veteran, professor and writer, which ends: "Open the hurt locker and see what there is of knives and teeth. Open the hurt locker and learn how rough men come hunting for souls."
Don't scroll down, the comment section is full of fellow Americans saying we should nuke some place and Europeans who think America is evil and starting wars everywhere. Come on guys, don't you think it's time to get out of the basement and actually try to fix these problems with society you're crying about?
To be honest there are a couple places in the world nuking which could solve half of the European and American people's problems instantly: Refugee crysis, terrorism, oil problems and many other things... Just gone in a blink of an eye.
This awseome video makes me think of my brother Jesse who served our country in th Marine Corps, and my buddy Nate, who is curently a US Army Combat engineer.
To be fair, we didn't really know the long-term effects, and it's not as if watching their citizens starve is a good way to avoid casualties. In war, people die, it might not have been the right choice, but we made the decision we thought would prevent the most bloodshed. I think we made the right one, but I don't know how the alternatives would have played out.
The fact that the opponent is evil doesn't justify you being evil. If they rape innocent civilians you don't act against their innocent civilians, you act against the ones that did the crimes against your people.
And if THEIR civilians SUPPORT the rape of your civilians (as the VAST MAJORITY of them IN FACT DO)?! Does that not make them JUST AS GUILTY of raping your civilians as the ones who actually did the raping?!
"dream of a world in peace, yet you cause pain and distruction" no one other than me feeling that this one phrase could fit us, and our armies, in a different way than the terrorists but as well as them?
LIAR -- we, and our armies, are SAVING civilization from pain and destruction! And just so you know, to even COMPARE our actions against terrorists to those of the terrorists is BY LAW IN ITSELF AN ACT OF TERRORISM and is THE SAME AS PERSONALLY FLYING THE JETS INTO THE TWIN TOWERS, and SHALL BE DEALT WITH ACCORDINGLY -- and THAT MEANS YOU!
those who hide from their enemies are affraid. those who fight truely for god will not hide. man who hide from there daeth are hiding from there god. a god who inspires to coware before his judgement is not real
Hell, have you heard of Japanese holdouts? They were soldiers who refused to accept the peace between Japan and the U.S. and continued fighting as late as 1949. As it was, most of the Japanese didn't WANT peace, and they only stopped because the emperor ordered it.
if you consider the health issues that followed the bombs, i do believe the toll was already above and beyond what an invasion could have done. Soldiers can discriminate. They can question the orders of killing children. Bombs do not.
Soldiers are the ones that risk their lives in war, it shouldn´t be that innocent 10year old girl or boy. Nor should it be the 78year old grandfather. Its the soldier, that goes in FOR hes kid, hes grandparents.
So what you´re saying, is that civilian casualties do not matter at all as long as victory is achieved ? Have you met this pall Stalin, he had the same ideology.
@AnarchyInTheUK1947 im so glad that the english and american know what american is doing and are realistic respect from me and good to know there are people that think that and not just trol around :D
The Wall Street Journal, The Guardian, most of the articles you can google for are early September reports. The one I'm referring to are early October ones that go on to say the US has passed Russia and Saudi Arabia in crude oil production. While some reports say it will be late this year others claim early next year. However, there are reports the US has already bypassed them this month. Such as the two I said before. But ultimately it's hard to say right now because of all the reports.
BP is a British company, yes, but I was referring to their oil well spill in Louisiana. My statement was simply pointing out there are American (Anglo-use of the word American) oil reserves, because BP spilled oil from the US, in the US, and if there wasn't any such thing as American oil, then what was spilled?
Wrong. US is now the second highest Oil Producer in the world. Next year it will be the first. We are producing roughly 10 million gallons of oil a day.
God bless america , end brave american soldiers dlaczego u gory, w najlepszych komentarzach nie ma żadnego naszego komentarza ? ... jestem widze żyje i nie rozumiem ...
Sometimes wars must be fought, but the end should never justify the means. If you nuke a country to end a war, thier blood is on your hands. End of story. 3 million of civlians died during the Vietnamn war when civillian killing was avoided, how many would have died if it wasnt? Would it be worth it? Do you sacrifice half the population for democrasy?
In which case we would have joined the emperor. I didn't say we necessarily should have, I was saying its use was exactly the way the gas was used in WW1. Also, no matter what happened, afaik there's a good chance there would have been a conventional invasion of Japan. As horrible as it sounds, several hundred thousand dead civilians is better than several million.
No war in history har been started over religion. Many wars are blamed on religion though, but that is another matter. Greed is the main reason for war.
The A bombs were unnecessary violence. I have read much on the subject of the world wars (tis interesting to me) and all signs point to the fact that japan was soon to surrender. Only some generals wanted to continue the war. The emperor was completely against it and was on the verge of going to war against his own generals for the sake of surrender.
No, Stalin knew of the A-Bomb and stated to Truman that he hopes that he'll use it soon against their enemies, i.e. Japan. The cold war was caused through power struggle between the East and West. Nuclear weapons were an element and most likely kept the two sides from going to war but didn't cause it. There was plenty of biological, chemical and other weapons being stocked piled other than Nuclear arms. All of which would have caused more deaths then in the two A-Bombings.
Operation Downfall would have ended in 4 million American casualties and 10 million Japanese fatalities. But the Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended in 246,000 Casualties.
It's also culture and human nature. People here talk in a way that banning religion would bring peace to these countries. They will find differen't reasons to hate each other, and kill and destroy.
You seem familiar, have we argued over pointless youtube comments before? I'm being serious, your name is ringing a bell or two... was it "The Price of Mile" by Sabaton?
The Hurt Locker was a crap movie but I have to give them props for the sets. I was in Iraq from 2003-04 and the city scenes was too real for me. Had to pause the movie a few times so I could process the memories that came back.
"you guys" Im British.... Also, "scraps of the British Army" there was 250000 men there in the 14th army alone in 13 divisions iirc. Not really "over" there was still 2 major problems, 1. Japan had yet to surrender and a mainland invasion would have cost more then the atomic bombs killed in allied losses alone, yet alone the japanese. 2. The russians had a bad problem of "take land ours now" in Europe, had to stem it from happening in asia too, meaning fast end required.
Been there done that, ex FDF Marine Commando and Sergeant Major, im telling you war mongering sobs, we need peace more than ever, and this goes to all parts. and im a war veteran, war opend my eyes, one who idolises war and occupation of other countries needs a no fly zone over their country. to fully grasp what it means,
WRONG -- there must NOT be any peace with terrorists until EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM IS KILLED, anything less is SHITTING ON THE GRAVES OF EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEIR VICTIMS!
i know that but he said Stalin i said he won what i meant to say was the allies did but he was a allies but he still technically won but while this no step back policy was idiotic his people still loved him he turned them into a super power although i do understand what you are saying
You are falling for "If the bad guys don´t fight fair, we shouldn´t respect the civilians either". And also, if you start killing civilians on purpose, does that make you any better than the "bad guys" you´re fighting against ?
If the civilians in question support the enemy aggression (as the VAST MAJORITY of them ACTUALLY DO in this war), then THEY ARE JUST AS GUILTY AS THE TERRORISTS and DESERVE TO BE KILLED JUST AS MUCH!
@@josefaschwanden1502 The song text is about terrorism in general (Gregory Sandoz said, and he probably will knew it best), and so it judges all who behave this way - Al Quaida an US army in the same for very much doing the same for different reasons. As so many did in the past and today. I don't want to discuss about patriotism, cause it is the same word all groups always use to declare ther actions as not debatable. Who isen't responsible for ther actions and call himself a patriot is adressed in this song text as well as those who act this way.
@@agentorange153 You summised it this way =P I don't call them teh same, but behave very much the same in this case. And if you call me a terrorist for having an opinion that is against yours, there seem to be a lot terrorists in your world. I don't know if the US have enough military capacity nor the job to fight against 70% of mankind on this planet(as well as the 20-40% of the US civilians who are terrorists too through your definition). Hey i'm german, the Wehrmacht tried that too ... well, a bit less radical as you want it but, history judged not that good about them. Btw. your nickname refer to a warcrime, plz try to imagen your feelings if such a weapon would be used against your people and ask yourself how 'cool' it would be to have crippled babys with a devasted life after halve an century. We have a history to learn from the made mistakes and not to repeat it, this is why we tell storys. Witchhunts are no valid way to solve your countrys, nor any countrys problems. It is a sign for weak education and lots of pain from a source you can't define or fight. I don't want to blame America for all countrys have ther problems, but it's the one closest to what is written down in my histroy books (... and the US of 1950 didn't talk very good about this version of itself it has become today, no matter how many reasons they missed to point out).
@@agentorange153 That's a sad lil world you live in :/ You ... realise that you argued, that you will drop nuclear weapons to US civilians in case of ther not-agreement? I'm not perfectly in the topic of your actual witchhunt-agencys guidelines, but it sounds a bit like supporting terrorist intents to murder 150 million us citizens by using nuclear and/or chemical weapons ... but i can be wrong. I'm very often a bit wrong by trying to understand the USA. But that's okay, some day our time will be explained in history books too. Till then - Cheers.
Once again -- ANYONE, whether a US citizen or not, who opposes the Great War on Terrorism is a TERRORIST who has PERSONALLY MURDERED ELEVEN THOUSAND OF OUR PEOPLE, and is to be KILLED! As our President declared on 9/20/2001, if you're not with us then you're a terrorist! And this is NOT terrorism -- BY DEFINITION, killing terrorists CANNOT be terrorism!
"Bombs do not" my point exactly, you don't expect us to have left our artillery on the ships, do you? Besides, enough of Japan consisted of zealots that the fighting wouldn't have been limited to the IJA and the Allies. For pity's sake, they flew themselves into ships to protect islands they had conquered, what do you think they would have done to protect their homeland?
One only has to look at Vietnam as an example of what happened because we wanted to avoid killing civilians to the point that it became counter-productive. The same thing is happening in the Middle East; why? Because in the end, the US LOST the Vietnam War because of guerillas fighting in that manner (and violating the Geneva Conventions in doing so). My belief: if they violate the Geneva Conventions, then we shouldn't have to give the any benefit of the doubt. Our soldiers come first.
What I THINK he's saying is that if we have to choose between the lives of our soldiers and the lives of civilians in an occupation zone that we should put the lives of our soldiers first. I'm inclined to agree with that sentiment, especially considering that in war, civilian casualties cannot be avoided.
this song perfectly describes extremists. and yet after 18 years USA leaves Afghanistan. and those very suicidal in trance pounced the shit of American and Russian might.
"As soon as men decide that all means are permitted to fight an evil, then their good becomes indistinguishable from the evil that they set out to destroy."
-Christopher Dawson
WRONG -- as long as people are NOT willing to use ALL means available to fight evil, they are bound to SUCCUMB to it!
Ah, yes, let's listen to a man who never fought evil about how we're supposed to take higher risks in order to avoid his entitled ass calling us the baddies.
Also, quite ironic since his good way to wage war was the way his father fought, sitting in trenches and throwing bodies at machine guns...
"Your war is in vain" that hit me
I like the lyrics "stand up and show me your face"; it makes a very good point.
If a man truly believes God is on his side, even to the point that he will kill the helpless, why would such a man hide his face?
There is no account of Ishmael being deceptive in his actions. Au contraire - Ishmael by all accounts, Biblical or otherwise, looked his friends and foes in the eye.
If God truly takes your side, I propose that stealth is unnecessary, for honesty and truth are highly valued in heaven. Deceit and lies, on the other hand, are fathered by the Devil.
True. If God really takes your side, he will give you courage and smartness to overcome the enemy. If his goal is really justified by heaven, he shouldn't be afraid to show his face.
Nazim Fathi That's also true...
*****
Well, to be fair civilians pay their taxes, generate production, and have the potential to become soldiers for the state. That makes them no less of a resource than a gold mine, farm, or bomb. So, civilians are just as legitimate a target in war as an oil field if your sole intent is to destroy the resources of your enemy.
But that is not the only reason why the public executions are taking place. They are making these things public so the local, and foreign, populations understand that ISIS is in control of those areas. This is done because it is only the lawful government, or those that the lawful government delegates it's authority to, that has the right to take the life of one of it's citizens (criminal executions being an example).
It is, I agree, cruel. But it is not ignorant; they know exactly what they are accomplishing when they hold their public executions. If they were ignorant ISIS would never have gotten to where it is now.
This kind of violence, in one form or another, has been the bread and butter method for new Arab States to emerge ever since the Turkish empire fragmented.
President Bush did the world a grave disfavor when he took the unnecessary step of removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and assassinating his sons.
Now there is nothing to be done except wait out the chaos and see who emerges victorious. I doubt it will be ISIS, but eventually a native Arab State will appear that has the necessary military & political strength to restore order using ruthless oppression to suppress all dissenters capable of causing trouble.
*****
It is an accepted fact that it is better to wound a soldier than to kill him, yes?
Well, how much more so to cause harm to a civilian population?
Majority of civilians contribute, in some fashion, to the welfare of the State. Even if just by existing as a consumer or manual laborer. Killing or wounding and, especially, displacing civilians hurts the ability of the opposition to resist your own efforts.
Civilians who are injured or become refugees clog roads, overflow hospitals and shelters, and force governments to spend time and resources needed for the war effort trying to aid the refugees or repair devastated civilian infrastructure.
Bringing the war to the "civilian" front also accelerates war fatigue - it was this very thing, the desire of the civilians in the North for peace, that almost allowed the South to win the US Civil War in 1864; and it was only when the North took the war to the civilians in the South (when Sherman pillaged and burned his way to the sea) that brought that conflict to a timely conclusion.
In Vietnam it was not the VC or NVN that defeated the US - it was the war fatigue of the civilian populace.
In addition, most soldiers have two loyalties; one to the State and one to the Family. As long as their families are safe they will endure great hardships on behalf of the State because they will be able to reason with themselves that their sacrifice secures the fates of the ones they love.
However, if their Family is not safe, then they become demoralized and will often attempt to desert, surrender, or even mutiny because, with most men, the loyalty to the Family is stronger than the loyalty to the State.
By targeting the Family you target the heart of the opposing soldiers, weaken the resolve of the civilian population to wage war, and thereby increase the pressure on the Threat leadership to seek a peace.
There is nothing inherently wrong with targeting civilians - because it is the civilians that enable war to take place; without them the military would not exist because the military exists to protect, or impose the will of, the civilians.
I believe ISIS is in error - but only because they are creating a situation wherein they cannot survive the post-war peace (assuming they win) because they are sowing the seeds for a counter-revolution.
But I digress; to sum it up - war is not possible without civilian support in one form or another; therefore civilians are never "innocent". Indeed, civilians are the primary perpetrators of war in our modern age because the countries most often involved in war are run by civilian leadership, elected or appointed, from amidst the civilian population.
*****
www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06/23/drone-killing-memo-released-after-ny-court-fight
Nádherná písnička a skvěle udělaný video! Well done!
This song couldn't be more fitting than now.
+Mr Skeltal
It fits now because for the last decade our problems haven't changed.
To be fair, Islam hasn't changed since Mohammed. The evil has always been their.
I am just going to give you the benefit of the doubt and say you are American. But Islam has changed, numerous times. After Muhammad’s death, there was a schism between who his heir as leader of the faith would be, leading to the formation of Shia and Sunni Islam. Briefly during the Middle Ages, Islam was unified especially during the crusade. During this time, knowledge was held to be the sight of god, taking inspiration from Socratic philosophy and Jewish thought. This golden age was an age were medical advances, scientific achievements and any idea that furthered humanity was not scene as heretical but as part of Allah’s will. This golden age that held out during the crusades, helped inspire the European reinassance, with people like Copernicus, Galeo and Da Vinci, taking inspiration from Islamic science and art. It was only during the rise and fall the Ottoman Empire that this idea of extremism took over. Many of these terroists groups started out as politically driven and gained a religious meaning over time. The Taliban for example, started as a anti soviet movment, before it the leaders began to use Religous idolatry as a rallying cry.
This evil you speak off however has always existed. Just not nessicarly in Islam always, but in man. We humans as a species are an evil force. Hell is not below us, it’s in our cities, in our souls and in our lives.
Look at 2021
@@brianstabile165 Lol I've been vindicated.
Fantastic videos thank you for the breave men how do what they are doing my hat goes off th them thank you
Wow perfect sync and editing with the music. It gives some cool Knight SGC vibe.
Hurt Locker is US military slang from the Viet Nam campaign. Being put in it generally refers to being hit by something bad, such as explosives. "Johnny got hit by an IED last night, he got put in the hurt locker." It is also the title of a poem by Brian Turner, a war veteran, professor and writer, which ends:
"Open the hurt locker
and see what there is of knives
and teeth. Open the hurt locker and learn
how rough men come hunting for souls."
The worst kind of people are the people who brag about committing this savagery, but cry victim when it happens to them.
Men who do not believe in God have simply not given the matter enough thought.
real
Awesome song,awesome band,awesome movie,awesome video
Don't scroll down, the comment section is full of fellow Americans saying we should nuke some place and Europeans who think America is evil and starting wars everywhere. Come on guys, don't you think it's time to get out of the basement and actually try to fix these problems with society you're crying about?
and i guess youìre a rusky? ^^
*fellow Americans*
I not read the comments yet but i'm 100%sure that there's some Russian Bias sayng how badass Putin is
I guess they played too much CoD MW
To be honest there are a couple places in the world nuking which could solve half of the European and American people's problems instantly: Refugee crysis, terrorism, oil problems and many other things... Just gone in a blink of an eye.
This awseome video makes me think of my brother Jesse who served our country in th Marine Corps, and my buddy Nate, who is curently a US Army Combat engineer.
I thank both of them for their service!
How are they now?
song goes really well with this movie. Great job dude
how many threats did sabaton receive for this amazing song?
what do you mean by that?
Tomasz Kiełtyka well it directly mocks alqaeda. i got few death threats (all hilarious i must admit) by isis-sympathizers for MUCH LESS
wow, well some people are really dumb apparently
Tomasz Kiełtyka are you talking about me?
they censored Winged Hussars but not this song...wtf?
To be fair, we didn't really know the long-term effects, and it's not as if watching their citizens starve is a good way to avoid casualties. In war, people die, it might not have been the right choice, but we made the decision we thought would prevent the most bloodshed. I think we made the right one, but I don't know how the alternatives would have played out.
i watched this film on live :D
Best homemade music video i've seen so far....
great video
Yeah
that is 1 of my favorite war movies
The fact that the opponent is evil doesn't justify you being evil.
If they rape innocent civilians you don't act against their innocent civilians, you act against the ones that did the crimes against your people.
And if THEIR civilians SUPPORT the rape of your civilians (as the VAST MAJORITY of them IN FACT DO)?! Does that not make them JUST AS GUILTY of raping your civilians as the ones who actually did the raping?!
made my day
"dream of a world in peace, yet you cause pain and distruction" no one other than me feeling that this one phrase could fit us, and our armies, in a different way than the terrorists but as well as them?
LIAR -- we, and our armies, are SAVING civilization from pain and destruction! And just so you know, to even COMPARE our actions against terrorists to those of the terrorists is BY LAW IN ITSELF AN ACT OF TERRORISM and is THE SAME AS PERSONALLY FLYING THE JETS INTO THE TWIN TOWERS, and SHALL BE DEALT WITH ACCORDINGLY -- and THAT MEANS YOU!
This discussion was not about Europe, this discussion was about Japan and America.
It's in the title .__. The movies name is The hurt locker. A great movie, you definitely should watch it :D
Whats great bout it?
lol thats what my professor said one day when he asked what I was listening to , while at the same time looking for content to use in a project
those who hide from their enemies are affraid. those who fight truely for god will not hide.
man who hide from there daeth are hiding from there god.
a god who inspires to coware before his judgement is not real
Fear finds no room in a heart of a true soldier !
+Phelan True well said my friend !
@Phelan Not only idiots, but mentally ill people. (Psychos for exemple).
See how cool that spotter was..That's the mark of a good soldier.
I`m definitely should watch this movie, it`s looks like a great movie :D
Bettee late than never
Movie sucks ain't worth your time
2 in 1 my fav .. :) feel good
realy good editing dude ;)
3:03 best part
really really goooood
95% of the comments are people tearing each other apart. Why can't we just enjoy the song? Or if you don't like it, just watch something else!
well done with the sync, sick editing.
Hell, have you heard of Japanese holdouts?
They were soldiers who refused to accept the peace between Japan and the U.S. and continued fighting as late as 1949.
As it was, most of the Japanese didn't WANT peace, and they only stopped because the emperor ordered it.
I've always loved Kathryn Bigelow's films.
if you consider the health issues that followed the bombs, i do believe the toll was already above and beyond what an invasion could have done. Soldiers can discriminate. They can question the orders of killing children. Bombs do not.
Soldiers are the ones that risk their lives in war, it shouldn´t be that innocent 10year old girl or boy.
Nor should it be the 78year old grandfather.
Its the soldier, that goes in FOR hes kid, hes grandparents.
fantastyczny film ^^ (dobrze że on wygrał oskara, a nie ten efekciarski awatar xp) piosenka genialna :)
what super sound!!! pls like to sabatob!!!
allah akbar :'( 7asbouna allah wa na3m alwakil
So what you´re saying, is that civilian casualties do not matter at all as long as victory is achieved ?
Have you met this pall Stalin, he had the same ideology.
GO HURT LOCKER ,, ANOTHER GREAT MOVIE 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸❤️❤️🙏🇺🇸🇮🇱✡️🕎🇬🇧🇨🇦🇳🇿🇫🇷🗼🗼🇫🇷🇧🇪🇳🇴🇩🇰🇵🇱🇺🇦🙏🙏
@AnarchyInTheUK1947 im so glad that the english and american know what american is doing and are realistic respect from me and good to know there are people that think that and not just trol around :D
true enough. hindsight 20/20 as they say.
you must end up listening to this song alot, don't you?
The Wall Street Journal, The Guardian, most of the articles you can google for are early September reports. The one I'm referring to are early October ones that go on to say the US has passed Russia and Saudi Arabia in crude oil production. While some reports say it will be late this year others claim early next year. However, there are reports the US has already bypassed them this month. Such as the two I said before. But ultimately it's hard to say right now because of all the reports.
fantastic nice...beautiful good luck
the music sounds more fitting to the madness that went on in Jugoslavia then in the gulf.
And you say "give me your Gold" and yet I have none...
All I have is lead...and it is heading your way
BP is a British company, yes, but I was referring to their oil well spill in Louisiana. My statement was simply pointing out there are American (Anglo-use of the word American) oil reserves, because BP spilled oil from the US, in the US, and if there wasn't any such thing as American oil, then what was spilled?
Wrong. US is now the second highest Oil Producer in the world. Next year it will be the first. We are producing roughly 10 million gallons of oil a day.
buena lo maximo
God bless america , end brave american soldiers
dlaczego u gory, w najlepszych komentarzach nie ma żadnego naszego komentarza ?
... jestem widze żyje i nie rozumiem ...
LOL I just saw that moive like 5 days ago
I'am also
thats true, the biggest industrie in the us is the weapons machinery and ammo industry
May God bless the M82A1 and Barrett Arms to rid the Earth of it's Pestilence
zajebisty film momentami trzyma za jaja :P
fair enough. hindsight 20/20 as they say.
the gas in ww1 was more of a fear tactic than a useful weapon.
Actually not even Bush, the whole Oil thing is unjustified and moot if we consider that a majority of the Oil imports of the US come from Canada.
Tradition of whole humanity Since 1096 and earlier
Sometimes wars must be fought, but the end should never justify the means. If you nuke a country to end a war, thier blood is on your hands. End of story. 3 million of civlians died during the Vietnamn war when civillian killing was avoided, how many would have died if it wasnt? Would it be worth it? Do you sacrifice half the population for democrasy?
LoL American movie name the Hurt Locker , the feel is the BUTTHURT Locker WHAHAHAHAHAHA
True, but my point is more that it's pointless to ignore the others and pick on one.
In which case we would have joined the emperor. I didn't say we necessarily should have, I was saying its use was exactly the way the gas was used in WW1. Also, no matter what happened, afaik there's a good chance there would have been a conventional invasion of Japan. As horrible as it sounds, several hundred thousand dead civilians is better than several million.
It's in the title.
Who the fuck needs history in school, just go to a Sabaton video on youtube, and check the comment section XD
No war in history har been started over religion. Many wars are blamed on religion though, but that is another matter. Greed is the main reason for war.
The A bombs were unnecessary violence. I have read much on the subject of the world wars (tis interesting to me) and all signs point to the fact that japan was soon to surrender. Only some generals wanted to continue the war. The emperor was completely against it and was on the verge of going to war against his own generals for the sake of surrender.
srry, thought i had answered! XP
Also, I can't argue with that. Hindsight 20/20 they say. :/
lol I laughed so hard when I saw his comment :D Even though my english is not the best
No, Stalin knew of the A-Bomb and stated to Truman that he hopes that he'll use it soon against their enemies, i.e. Japan. The cold war was caused through power struggle between the East and West. Nuclear weapons were an element and most likely kept the two sides from going to war but didn't cause it. There was plenty of biological, chemical and other weapons being stocked piled other than Nuclear arms. All of which would have caused more deaths then in the two A-Bombings.
Operation Downfall would have ended in 4 million American casualties and 10 million Japanese fatalities. But the Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended in 246,000 Casualties.
It's also culture and human nature. People here talk in a way that banning religion would bring peace to these countries. They will find differen't reasons to hate each other, and kill and destroy.
You seem familiar, have we argued over pointless youtube comments before? I'm being serious, your name is ringing a bell or two... was it "The Price of Mile" by Sabaton?
The Hurt Locker was a crap movie but I have to give them props for the sets. I was in Iraq from 2003-04 and the city scenes was too real for me. Had to pause the movie a few times so I could process the memories that came back.
Was in Sadr City in 07 and Mosul in 09-10, yea the tactics and military operations sucked, but they had the dealings about dead on.
What were you doing in Iraq,is there anything else that you havent stole from those heroic people?
@@SnakeP1tPoetry
Heroes? The only thing i have to say to you is the lyrics of this song.
@@SnakeP1tPoetry heroic.lol
indeed, all true
Name movie or movies you used for video.
"you guys"
Im British....
Also, "scraps of the British Army" there was 250000 men there in the 14th army alone in 13 divisions iirc.
Not really "over" there was still 2 major problems, 1. Japan had yet to surrender and a mainland invasion would have cost more then the atomic bombs killed in allied losses alone, yet alone the japanese. 2. The russians had a bad problem of "take land ours now" in Europe, had to stem it from happening in asia too, meaning fast end required.
Been there done that, ex FDF Marine Commando and Sergeant Major, im telling you war mongering sobs, we need peace more than ever, and this goes to all parts. and im a war veteran, war opend my eyes, one who idolises war and occupation of other countries needs a no fly zone over their country. to fully grasp what it means,
WRONG -- there must NOT be any peace with terrorists until EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM IS KILLED, anything less is SHITTING ON THE GRAVES OF EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEIR VICTIMS!
This reminds me of something about a border in 2024… hmmm.
Netherlands Army the best
oh wait. i did respond. damn inbox. X3
i know that but he said Stalin i said he won what i meant to say was the allies did but he was a allies but he still technically won but while this no step back policy was idiotic his people still loved him he turned them into a super power although i do understand what you are saying
Don't know about that, but my guess is that the US didn't know that.
fair enough. hindsight 20/20 they say.
and he won
what movie is this video from?
You are falling for "If the bad guys don´t fight fair, we shouldn´t respect the civilians either".
And also, if you start killing civilians on purpose, does that make you any better than the "bad guys" you´re fighting against ?
If the civilians in question support the enemy aggression (as the VAST MAJORITY of them ACTUALLY DO in this war), then THEY ARE JUST AS GUILTY AS THE TERRORISTS and DESERVE TO BE KILLED JUST AS MUCH!
A crusader-related song with a american patriotism video. That's some kind of social critique, isen't it? =P
In the name of god is about al quaida and 9/11, not the crusaders
@@josefaschwanden1502 The song text is about terrorism in general (Gregory Sandoz said, and he probably will knew it best), and so it judges all who behave this way - Al Quaida an US army in the same for very much doing the same for different reasons. As so many did in the past and today. I don't want to discuss about patriotism, cause it is the same word all groups always use to declare ther actions as not debatable.
Who isen't responsible for ther actions and call himself a patriot is adressed in this song text as well as those who act this way.
@@agentorange153 You summised it this way =P I don't call them teh same, but behave very much the same in this case. And if you call me a terrorist for having an opinion that is against yours, there seem to be a lot terrorists in your world. I don't know if the US have enough military capacity nor the job to fight against 70% of mankind on this planet(as well as the 20-40% of the US civilians who are terrorists too through your definition). Hey i'm german, the Wehrmacht tried that too ... well, a bit less radical as you want it but, history judged not that good about them.
Btw. your nickname refer to a warcrime, plz try to imagen your feelings if such a weapon would be used against your people and ask yourself how 'cool' it would be to have crippled babys with a devasted life after halve an century.
We have a history to learn from the made mistakes and not to repeat it, this is why we tell storys. Witchhunts are no valid way to solve your countrys, nor any countrys problems. It is a sign for weak education and lots of pain from a source you can't define or fight. I don't want to blame America for all countrys have ther problems, but it's the one closest to what is written down in my histroy books (... and the US of 1950 didn't talk very good about this version of itself it has become today, no matter how many reasons they missed to point out).
@@agentorange153 That's a sad lil world you live in :/ You ... realise that you argued, that you will drop nuclear weapons to US civilians in case of ther not-agreement? I'm not perfectly in the topic of your actual witchhunt-agencys guidelines, but it sounds a bit like supporting terrorist intents to murder 150 million us citizens by using nuclear and/or chemical weapons ... but i can be wrong. I'm very often a bit wrong by trying to understand the USA.
But that's okay, some day our time will be explained in history books too. Till then - Cheers.
Once again -- ANYONE, whether a US citizen or not, who opposes the Great War on Terrorism is a TERRORIST who has PERSONALLY MURDERED ELEVEN THOUSAND OF OUR PEOPLE, and is to be KILLED! As our President declared on 9/20/2001, if you're not with us then you're a terrorist! And this is NOT terrorism -- BY DEFINITION, killing terrorists CANNOT be terrorism!
Is this from the movie Sniper?
No, as suggested by the title the video was from the movie "The Hurt Locker"
Makes sense
What does this have to do with my point ?
I was not talking about Serbia, I was talking about USA, Japan and WW2.
"Bombs do not" my point exactly, you don't expect us to have left our artillery on the ships, do you? Besides, enough of Japan consisted of zealots that the fighting wouldn't have been limited to the IJA and the Allies. For pity's sake, they flew themselves into ships to protect islands they had conquered, what do you think they would have done to protect their homeland?
@SRBHaT3R
the name of the movie in in the title..... here's your sign
One only has to look at Vietnam as an example of what happened because we wanted to avoid killing civilians to the point that it became counter-productive. The same thing is happening in the Middle East; why? Because in the end, the US LOST the Vietnam War because of guerillas fighting in that manner (and violating the Geneva Conventions in doing so). My belief: if they violate the Geneva Conventions, then we shouldn't have to give the any benefit of the doubt. Our soldiers come first.
What I THINK he's saying is that if we have to choose between the lives of our soldiers and the lives of civilians in an occupation zone that we should put the lives of our soldiers first. I'm inclined to agree with that sentiment, especially considering that in war, civilian casualties cannot be avoided.
8 year old comment but uh, the song is about terrorism being cowardly and evil
this song perfectly describes extremists.
and yet after 18 years USA leaves Afghanistan.
and those very suicidal in trance pounced the shit of American and Russian might.
belde portatif titreşimsiz yürütülen kameralar varmı sizde