NASA Reveals Major New Moon Landing Update!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 22 чер 2024
- NASA Reveals Major New Moon Landing Update!
Last Video: This Rocket Is 60 Years Old.. and it's still flying
• This Rocket Is 60 Year...
►Become a member today: / @thespaceraceyt
►Support the channel by purchasing from our merch store: shop.theteslaspace.com/
► Join Our Discord Server: / discord
► Patreon: / theteslaspace
► Subscribe to our other channel, The Space Race: / theteslaspace
Mars Colonization News and Updates
• Mars Colonization News...
SpaceX News and Updates: • SpaceX News and Updates
The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humans' mission to explore the universe. We’ll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX and NASA mission to colonize Mars and the Moon. We’ll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, NASA, Starlink, Blue Origin, The James Webb Space Telescope and more. If you’re interested in space exploration, Mars colonization, and everything to do with space travel and the space race... you’ve come to the right channel! We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!
► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: www.theteslaspace.com
Business Email: sean@creatormill.com
#Spacex #Space #mars
0:00 - Intro
0:21 - NASA x Intuitive Return To The Moon
3:24 - PACE In Orbit
6:20 - Collins Space Suit Update
9:03 - Solar Flare Hits Southern Hemisphere - Наука та технологія
You do a good job of covering content others are not. This was a good report. Thank you!
Thank you for this very informative UA-cam video!
Well done!
Instant subscribe, thank you.
Great information 😊
Thanks for your service bro. Without you, I would have no idea about anything to do with space.
I am so excited for the next few years because we are about to see such a cool race to the moon again, as well as gain so much knowledge of our neighboring celestial body and I am all for it!!!!!
The new space race is finally heating up this year, so many new launches in just one month and a half. If this moon landing and the ones to come such as Viper are successful, we'll surely see a moon landing in 2026.
If ww3 won't break out...
@ygreaterr I honestly don't think WW3 will happen at least in the next 20 years, a war even as big as WW1 today wouldn't be beneficial for any of the participants, a more pacific competition like a new space race or a technological race would.
@@franciscoborrashidalgo7776 got it. Understood. But still there's always a risk. Who knows. I'm in asia and we are surrounded by potential attackers while getting ruled by dictators. I really want to see the rise of space exploration. I really do!
@ygreaterr Obviously there's always a risk, specially when people like Putin or Kim Jong-Un are in possession of nuclear weapons, but realistically (unless one of them has a mental breakdown) they know going into war would mean their doom. So the best thing we can do is staying positive and wait until the future arrives.
Mooooooooon! I went to Embry Riddle who has a payload on this! Hope all goes well!
Which stare. I'm in Prescott, not far from E-R near the airport.
I went to FIT. Our flight schools used to compete back in the 1970s
I went to FIT. Our flight schools used to compete back in the 1970s. I was there to see Apollo 13, 15, 16. Four of us took my buddy's dad's C-172 at night to fly up the Banana River past Titusville and circle the small restricted area over the Cape and around one of the Apollo Saturn Fives. I'm guessing it was Apollo 16. We were at 2000 ft MSL and circuled the very small restricted area over the ocean and circuled back over the land. The spotlights were shinging bright at that beautiful rocket. The wind was strong that evening and as we came back over land, we slowed down enough to watch a drive-in movie for a few minutes before we landed. The movie was a black and white porno, believe it or not. So we hung out for a while. The good old days for sure.
"Solar flare hits Southern Hemisphere"
I'm in New Zealand and it missed us!
Buzz Aldrin: "Ouch. Is that your ring?"
Alien: "No. It's my watch".
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I am so excited about living on the moon ! It's going to be so much fun playing with my Legos and action figures in low gravity !
Some private companies are already interested in building lunar houses, take that together with a possible boom in space tourism and you'll get at least one company with the idea of building a Moon camp for tourists. So your dream might not be too far-fetched!
introducing a book called Artemis by the same author as “The Martian”🤓
@@loadingnewadsgreat book suggestion! LOVED that book.
No worries, you won't be living on our Moon.
@@MrHoojaszczyk Maybe I will, who knows, the sapient race is getting wild and space tourism might play a really important role in the future of the Moon.
I really like your videos! At 10:53 in your video, you showed the Solar Dynamic Observatory's video of Sunspot region AR 12192 (2192), which was actually on the solar surface on October 24, 2014. Over several days in October 2014, AR 12192 (2192) produced six X Class Flares: It spit out: 1.) X 4.58, 2.) X 2.96, 3.) X 2.88, 4.) X 2.39, 5.) X 1.58, and 6.) X 1.5. This sunspot group occurred in Solar Cycle 24 (previous cycle) and traveled across the Sun's surface 6 months after Solar Maximum in Solar Cycle 24. Solar Max for Solar Cycle 24 occurred in April 2014. Its common for some of the largest sunspots and flares to occur after the Maximum, which is the case with 2192. And, AR 12192 (2192) very well may have been the largest Sunspot group for Solar Cycles 23 through the current one, Solar Cycle 25. As of yet, the largest sunspot group produced by Solar Cycle 25 seems to have occurred in May, 2022, and it was Sunspot region AR13014 (3014), which was measured around 1190 MH. For comparison, Sunspot region AR 12192 (2192) in your video was recorded at 2750 MH, which is over twice the size of anything that Solar Cycle 25 has produced. Further complicating the state of Space Weather, the Wilcox Solar Observatory made this claim on their website: The SC25 solar max may already be in the past as the 365-day smoothed solar flux peaked on June 27, 2023. So, Solar Max for Cycle 25 may have already happened. But, it is a wait and see to get conformation on the Max. Thank you for all the work you do on documenting all the new rockets.
Even better would be able to absorb that energy that comes at us
One has to wonder why fuel tanks on landers do not utilize a “piston wiper” system in a cylinder style tank… as with a hydraulic ram type cylinder. Regardless of gravity or motion, the piston would force the fuel to the output line.
Ever action has a reaction. Piston motion would move the whole craft.
@@gmeister03 it is tough explain in short. But there would be no reciprocating motion, only constant pressure to the supply lines for the engines or turbo pumps for larger engines… mote like a hydraulic cylinder were pressure from a COPV would apply pressure above a piston or ram with O-Ring seal to the sidewalls of the fuel tank minimizing volumetric space so as the fuel is used (depleted) it would keep the remaining fuel moving towards the line feeding the engines or turbo pumps
Metal pistons inside a cryogenic tank filled with cryogenic fuels or propellants would be subject to metal expansion and contraction from the cold temperatures, thus losing desired effects. Other materials would not withstand the cryogenic temperatures and fail as well. If a motorized piston were used as opposed to a hydraulic piston, having electrical connections inside a tank is hazardous, and a spark could ignite the fuel. Also, maintaining a piston rate of motion to desired tank pressures and fuel flow consumption rate would be difficult to determine and maintain accurately.
@@Tinman_56 yes I agree with your points. It is such an extreme environment. I worked with extreme pressure but high temp for 41 years before I retired. 20,000 psi at 500 degrees F is easier than the cryogenic side of the spectrum
Why is no one covering this? Trying to get information about this landing is unreasonably difficult.
love it fantastic . and... .. still no live camera feed on the moon
Important missions
Apollo didn't have to worry about how lunar sand blasts around. It is so cool that we are serious enough about a lunar base that we are getting data for planning. The lunar lander fuel gauge technology sounds cool. All Apollo had was a stopwatch estimate. Landing with only 15 seconds left of fuel on Apollo 11 was a real nail biter. I wish Starship had a better abort capability on launch and lunar landing.
I love this mission
As usual who is filming the landing this multi angle feeling is intriguing.
Animation.
or pace can keep track of the northwest passage opening...
Let's goooo
Can’t wait to see how high LUNR stock will go when it lands
I question the smoke or dust billowing with no atmosphere.
There wont be much dust. If you look at the original manned landing, the landers feet had no dust on them.
Who's holding the camera 🤔on the Moon 😂🤣🤣
Give the Camera Man a raise 🎉
Animation
@@azkavanny3077
Exactly 🥰
Go to the front of the class !
Animation is 😘📢 FAKE, MAKE BELIEVE, NONSENSE 💥
And you ate it up🤔 with a spoon 🥣
For my tax money 💰 turn that telescope 🔭 around and show Planet Earth. Show me driving to market. Show you watching cartoons 😄
Until then 🐒 I can't get fooled again 🔥
@@gregoryleonwatson8631 really. Just because this is animated everything is fake?
@@azkavanny3077
If you want to believe in 🐒make believe 🥴 that's fine.
Leave me out of it 🤔
Have a good day ☺️
@@gregoryleonwatson8631 ok but in this context you made me like im a stupid man
This is PBS Nova quality.
Meaning FAKE?
The IM-1 Odysseus lander has a payload of 100kg, and that ain't much at high launch and transport costs. Get the impression that NASA still sticks to the known SF idea of a base on the surface of the Moon - that won't happen due to the high radiation of 500 mSv/yr, forcing a rotation of the crews every two months to avoid severe health damages. Much better to establish such a base ca 10m deep inside of a lunar lava tube at constant -7°C and earth-like radiation and thus crews that rotate every six months to be effective teams. That's what the Chinese CNSA intends.
IM-1 is not the final design, target payload is much higher.
why can we not spray water in mist form or an anti-freeze solution that does not contaminate the surface under the lander holding down the dust
For the heck of it can they land near the original landing? and check out the stuff left behind?
WE NEVER STEPPED ON THE MOON DUDE FAKED
Astronauts to the moon 🌙!
Hahahahaha
The laughs on you. It happened
@@kefhomepage it’s a quote from “ConeHeads”!!! I couldn’t find an emoji of Tang to put in after the comment .
Unsure where my reply went… but it’s a quote from ConeHeads….. I guess English is only 1 of us first language.
@@SovietMOBmight conceited of you to assume people would know a movie dialogue from a crappy and obscure 90s movie.
@@RaptorMaitre conceited of you to assume I would think anyone knew that quote which is precisely why I stated that it was from a movie and wasn’t an opinion of mine personally.
My comment is about your video one year ago related to establishing a lunar city. Three issues can be resolved using in situ resources. Baking the lunar rocks at high temps could liberate oxygen and metals for making tools and glass, as it contains mostly oxygen (O), silicon (Si), iron (Fe), magnesium (Mg), calcium (Ca), aluminum (Al), manganese (Mn) and titanium (Ti). This (1) produces oxygen, (2) reduces the payloads required, and (3) the glass and plastics for a dome, which of course would need new tech to insulate and polarize to protect from radiation. Similarly for Mars. We would still need to bring food, machines, and hab, but it would be a lot easier. One way to think about this is to watch the "Gold Rush" TV series, where miners must bring all they need to the bare and remote Yukon, habs, food, machines and spares. But if we can use the native resources for water, oxygen, and metals, that should be the bulk of the resources.
What dose "early warning" of an X class flare mean? 7 minutes early?
Well i do wants to see 🙈 them install a moon 🌝 Base 😊❤
But... Isn't there a no fly zone over the Arctics? Please explain...
CME. Watch out honey!
wow LUNR stock is gonna go when it lands
You are living in a dream world! Never going to happen!
@ 1:50 dude there are no buildings on the moon.
Once they are constructed, in a hopefully near future, but who knows when. Obviously, not now
Hats off to the support team on the Vomit Comet.
Need a diaphragm under pressure that collapses as the fuel is used keeping the fuels stable and confined
There was not one spec of lunar dust on the Apollo LEM's feet, why so much interest now?
PACE mission suffered all sorts of problems long before Trump was in office. NASA had to cap the program overruns in 2014 as the program was struggling for years. You can see why it was attempted to be cancelled due to this so funds could be steered towards Artemis. However, NASA was able to finally get it going and I hope it does well.
It’s getting ridiculous at this point!
Super sar discovery...
Omg you mean those solar flares are strong enough to shut off my microwave and shine pretty lights in the sky 😱 terrifying!!
Don't like how the videos end now without letting us know it's ended.
Cry
🙄🤫🤫👉💩💩
Am I just being stoopid here? I watched the moon landing back in 1969 with my mum n dad. I was 4 yrs old. If we had the tech to do it then, why is it so difficult now?
Because 1: New companies who don’t have the experience are entering the business which increases the rate of failure until they learn. 2 Then have much, *much!* less funding than back in the 60s
Because the individual knowledge of everyone involved and the “organisational know-how” of how to actually run such a huge, complex project has been lost after such a long time. Much of the equipment is archaic, and many things cannot be bought “off the shelf” and have to be specially manufactured. Re-designing from scratch is cheaper and better. However, it takes years to build up that sort of expertise and NASA is going through the same problems it had in the early to mid-60’s.
Rocket technology has not progressed much at all and although modern computers are far more sophisticated, they are far more vulnerable to particle radiation than those that used low density integrated circuits and magnetic core memory, both of which are extremely radiation hard. There is also not as much funding, no cold war imperative and no time limit placed on it by a president. We also live in much more risk averse times. All these issues are what has caused it to take so long this time around.
@@gunternetzer9621ah, that will be it then.
...because Plankton is also formed by animals, not just Plants ( PhytoPlankton and ZooPlankton)...
Zooplankton feeds on phytoplankton. And whales feed on them again.
We are still not back at the number of whales which naturally lived in the oceans.
How does this affect the natural balance of the oceans?
I bet it cant land upside down like the japanese lander did. Now thats skill.
Thought they worked those fuel issues out and landing issues in 1969, -73 with humans on board and they did the return trip in 8 days ?$&?%?
100% make believe. Have fun kids
great, now we need to wait several years for something expensive to get launched
This is strange honesty on what SCIENCE knows and controls... yet they know so much of Space stuff.
“If the earth had been pointed”???
I have question that concerns me with our space explorations.
If the Russian have sent up a nuclear style weapon to take out our satellites. Will this issue also take out the space station?
We send astronauts to the moon will they be able to come home?
I hope I get an honest open answer. 99% of the time we don't!!
Jesus the amount of contracts/money intuitive machine will make if it does the entire trip well… multi billion contract.. this stock will explode..
wow solar science didnt learn the alphabet
Things we like to see hit a golf ball tip some water on the moon Live Cams sending data back to earth youtube what i miss ?
build something to stay in
HOLD IT , didnt nasa landed a bigly moon buggy 55 yrs ago ? Now nasa only can do a 650 kilogram cargo landing on moon . LOL , cant make this up even if I try haha !
Their budget is significantly lower and the NASA mission which landed wasn’t TRYING to land more weight.
Do you want to compare our current rockets with the mamooth Saturn V? Would you be willing to pay that price tag today?
The payload is 100kg
Didn't they learn about lunar surface dust and engines last time they went? What more is there to learn, didn't seem a problem last time! Can't wait for the return and the uninterrupted video feed documenting that amazing achievement! I jest, we'll get more footage of mission controll!!
@@filipe5722 If nasa can already do this with landing a huge moon buggy 5 decades why do they need help from a small private space companies ?????
"NASA loves redundancy"
And how many times has NASA had redundancy in getting to space to know if it actually loves it or not???
A lot
@@filipe5722
Really?
Name a time when NASA had 2 completely separate rocket systems for getting humans into space.....
We had the space shuttle for 30 years, and when we stopped using it, we had to hop a ride with the Russians....
We didn't have the ability again until SpaceX.
I guess can't have a flexible fuel bladder inside a solid tank to contain the fuel? Obviously I'm not a rocket scientist.
Cue the hilarious flerf-comments!!
It is amazing the money that goes into funding stupid studies.
What buildings on the moon might b damaged when the lander lands on the moon ? I think i heard it correct 😂
One of the payloads of IM-1 is DOGE-1. This crypto community funded project, will be the first moon/space advertisement in history. As per Wikipedia; mission to launch a small (40 kg) satellite into lunar orbit to explore the Moon and display images and digital art on a small screen on lunar orbiter that will be broadcast back to Earth.[7] According to Samuel Reid, a miniature screen on the DOGE-1 satellite will display advertisements, images and logos, which will subsequently be broadcast to the Earth.[8]
Don't worry. Plankton will never get his hands on the secret formuler er. 🤪
Video of the moon landscape please. It’s just that simple.
1969 video wasn’t that bad. Now it’s 2024 turn to video in high definition.
One issue: The Moon has no environment. It's a dead world. It does have geologic features, which is what landers can modify.
Why is it taking so long?
What role did you play during COVID? Collabos? Talk. What do you say Adams? What?
They’re also looking for alien bases under water ✊🏼🇺🇸✊🏼
Can this solar flare cause abnormal heat? Here in Nigeria (Africa), we've been experiencing abnormal heat even at night.
No, it will not have any effect on temperature.
You live in an equatorial zone. That's not unusual in any way.
This heat recently just started. I don't think I've experienced something like this for over 20 years now
@@tee3553*global warming*
What year is this? 1968? Who gives a ship about a recent moon landing
Lots of us
When (not if) a bigger X class flare hits Earth in the coming solar cycle, all bets will be as ‘off’ as the lights and electrical system all over the planet.
50 Years ago, We were putting people on The Moon, now we're just putting instrument packages on The Moon. (sigh) "BACK TO THE FUTURE"- - -
WE NEVER STEPPED FOOT ON THE MOON 50 YRS AGO LOL
You mean the CGI landing 😂
No. Why does it always cgi?
@@azkavanny3077 DUDE IT WAS FAKED, STAAP THE BS OK
@@LEELUNK-IS-A-HUNK im asking. Please answer
@@azkavanny3077 yes it's clearly is
@@witar2972 i want prove
My block's sand pattern will be different. My lunar block is special. Musk could have had it for $200 million but he hesitated. Mere couch cushion change to him....
Quite interesting to see how fragile our infrastructure is to solar flares. So far we are lucky for not having received the full blow of one.
The fuel gage is a waste, all one needs to do is simply meter the fuel flow out, subtract that from the amount filled in the tank, and then you know how much is left. Duh!!! My 63 year old VW Bug has no gas gage, and i simply calculate the remaining range by how many miles i driven since the last fill up.
A much worse problem is fuel floating around in blobs and being nowhere near the fuel pump.
Also they’re responsible for the oxygen we breathe???????
Let's see; NASA awarded contract to Intuitive Machines to land Intuitive lander on moon carrying instruments - are these NASA instruments or are they Intuitive instruments ???
NASA instruments who are transported to moon by intuitive machines
I guess no one understands fuel blathers????
whoops
Once the moon is habitable then building service stations to place in orbit and will be used to supply the Star ships heading for Mars and beyond.
"Once the moon is habitable"!!! Dream on!!! The moon will never be habitable! It's the moon! It has about 1/6th the gravity of earth for starters!!!
i don't think they meant habitable like earth i think they meant has a permanent human presence like a colony...once we start mining the moon and have production of resources up there is when the real space exploration will kick off not before then @@nightlightabcd
@@nightlightabcd I think he meant when there is a viable base of operations to become a permanent human presence there, even if the same people don't stay there for long. The moon will never be green, yes, but the modules built as waystations and science outposts will act as seeds for a future industrial settlements/orbiting stations for future expansion beyond. The most logical answer is a rotating staff for a given amount of months and return to earth as new staff head up. A human presence will be permanent, but the same humans won't stay for more than a few months.
@@ClockworkCrow7 yes, I believe the correct term is that the future moon base is self-sufficient, ie economically viable
Have you heard of Van Allen belt? Look it up. You won't be living on Moon during your lifetime.
The new michael jackson is the best
Not a chance Muffin heads... AI looks great though ...
It would be nice to have a well built lander/rover. Imagine how much CHEAPER it would be. I mean a very mobile one that can make 10 MPH or so.
Woohoo! Plankton farts from spaaaaace! haha rank. =)
That was not a HUGE flare ya'll.. shortwave radio bounces off the Ionosphere so many M & X class flares mess it up for very short periods. An impact of X20+ is a tech killer
Womp Womp
. . . . be LIE ve
Why do you use the word thee? It’s not a modern word.
YALL NEED TO LEARN FROM ANNUNAKI... PUMA PUNKA GRAVITY BOOST GET OUT TEN TIMES EASIER
😂😂😂
Mirror mirror
Good luck landing on a plasma reflection of Earth & waters
USA, landed on the moon six times , so why this kind of mission , didn't we learn all this fuel stuff then with no issues.
New companies are getting involved.
lol, take a breath dude.
First
Its nothing more than a distraction..... Lokk here not there......wake up ffs
bs
Maybe NASA should declare a war on meteoroids and suggest the Chinese and Russians are working on asteroid manipulation technology. "We can't allow a meteoroid gap to open!". etc.