Nice project Peter! I use a few of this design (slight variations) in my AM setup. I directly power headphones so I can hear my final audio... As you pointed out, also great for driving scopes :^)
+Mr Carlson's Lab Hi Paul, thank you so much! Yeah with a AM set up it is much easier as the demodulator is very easy to realise. For SSB it is a bit more effort.. Anyway enjoy a happy advent! 73
Use a box with a lid so all soldering can be done easier. Stay with metal. Use a copper strap across the bottom to connect the ground side. The box has all kinds of "floating" grounding you have used. The BNC is grounded, so take advantage or that and design a proper voltage divider network. Use a coax cable and keep the shield on it except where the IRON Core toroid not a ferrite goes. Ground each end of the shield as close to the toroid as possible and at each rf connector. Use polymide tape and build up the diameter so the torrid is a snug fit and will stay in place. Use non inductive resistor for the divider network. Do not use a wire-wound resistor anywhere, especially as a trim resistor. Why is everyone still using UHF connectors. They reflect RF as low as 100 MHz. I change everything to N Type, even all my radios. Use good ones from Amphenol or King with a white bronze coating. It will not tarnish like silver. While you're at it add an AM detector to it. You will need a shield between the 2 circuits. Ig you want to go above the HF bands, you will need to use SMT and keep all leads as short as possible around the divider network and maybe shield it also if you go to 1 gig.
I was going to say it’s not the easiest way to make an rf sampler but the fact it’s adjustable is a winner. I am making some videos myself on playing with RF test gear and I enjoy construction projects so will have to give this design a try. As always thanks for sharing.
TRX Bench I will be uploading my video using a simple loop in a dummy load housing later this week. When I investigated the frequency response of my rf sample it was a bit disappointing with a high pass response and 30 dB difference in attenuation between 2 and 145mhz. What was the response of your transformer coupled sampler. The idea behind my short video series will be how not to destroy your front end. My best regards Chris. I made a boob measuring a second harmonic as I had not included for the frequency response of my sampler. I would love to hear your thoughts on this and measurement errors in a future video. My very best regards Chris AKA all the gear and no idea!
Nice project, Peter. I would have built this if I hadn't bought a Kenwood SM-220 Station Monitor earlier this year. I still enjoyed watching the video. Thanks!
Absolutely terrific! I have been thinking of one of these for a long time. The ones available on the market are just too expensive. This is a real handy project. Thanks so much for the very useful contribution.
It's funny how things go, but I was just thinking of building some kind of device to pick off a sample signal from my transmitter for monitoring. This will certainly meet my needs. Thanks Peter
Nice 10:1 I think the hardest part was soldering that last connection lol and finding an enclosure! Really enjoyed this video, Thanks for making this! 73
Nicely done Peter. If I didn't already have a Bird tap and several others I'd be warming up the soldering iron! Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! 73 - Dino KL0S
Great video. I really enjoy all your videos and I plan on building this project soon. I have built one in the past using a slightly different design, but this one looks very good. Thank you for the video. I always look forward to watching more videos from you!
Hi Peter, what value resistor did you put across the POT? I see the 50ohm connecting to the bnc but I don't believe you mentioned the value on the pot.
Just noticed the FT-747 on the bench just watched a new video #107 on The Radio Shop with you friend Buddy about the bad vari-caps on the back of the Radio that are know for failure on that radio. They are 90 degree angle and looks like good quality ones cannot be found with the 90 or as some say right angle mounting and improvised mounting is required.
Simple, effective and a much needed device. Thanks for sharing. One question, do the resistors have to be non-inductive? I have a bunch of 50ohms lying around, how can I test whether they are inductive or not?
Personally I would put all components on one side only and put feet on what you have used as a lid. Makes assembly much easier. Useful video though. The formula for the number of turns verses attenuation of the sample would have been useful but is available on another video on youtube.
sadly peter didn't mention the value of the pot, when i calculate 2x22ohm paralell i get 11. somethig ohm???, what is the value of the pot ,gues paralell whit the 22ohm should be 470ohm in paralel whit 22ohm, you get 22
+TheMidnightrdr Hi, thanks for stopping by. No this device is designed for 100W max it will work for a short while with 200W but not more. Hope that helps 73
I would have guessed an impedance bump , going through the box to dummy load ? My reasoning is the dimensions of RF path , coax impedance is partially made up by the dimensions between dielectrics ? Thanks again John
+KD0CAC Hi, yes you are right this is valid for coax cables. In this case it is no problem as we are far below critical frequencies where it indeed matters. Thanks for comment 73
Why are you using a wire wound resistor (pot)? This adds unwanted inductance. Also where did you find a 22 ohm pot? I checked and they are unobtainable, at least I couldn't fine one.
Nice. What is the model number of the tap you have going to your db meter...thinking of getting the same meter to set my variable bird RF sampler to -40dbm
+Barnekkid Hi, we could calculate it but we don't need it here as it is simple as it can be.Just do some windings and check the output voltage. If it is okay for your needs fine if not put some more on the core. Check the output power over the frequency is it flat fine if not take another core material or put more windings for more induction. I only try to keep it simple of course we can handle this via maths as well. 73
Peter nice video, I was actually considering do this very thing, so thanks for confirming my approach. One thing I saw in your video is sitting odd with me. You design the tap with a 50 ohm source resistance then you directly terminated it to the oscilloscope which is a high impedance port and when you did the power measurement with the Rohde & Schwarz URV5 you terminated to 50 ohm load and took a bridge measurement, which depending on the probe that you used makes sense but should you also done the same with oscilloscope ?
+Michael Katt Hi Michael, yes of course you are right! To get the right figures you need to terminate it with 50 Ohm as I did it with my URV5. If you need to get an accurate measurement on your scope you need to terminate it with 50 Ohm. For my demonstration it was not necessary so I was able to skip it and only terminated the source with 1MOhm with the result of doubling the output voltage. Thanks for comment 73
Wow !! great job Peter. I like your Rhode & Schwarz URV5 milivoltmeter and I wonder if there is an equivalent modern device that can do the same functions?
Nice Video, nice project! Would it be possible to directly use this tiny tool, to measure the output harmonics of an home brewed transmtiter? Or should one better use an dummy load, with an -40 dB output to connect the Analyzer/ Scope to? Thanks.
+MrVertigo1971 Hi, yes that is possible as the harmonic test is a relative measurement to the carrier (dbc). Therefore you can use this device. But if you need 100% accuracy you need to take a dummy load with a precision test output level with a flat gain over the entire bandwidth. Hope that helps.. 73s
Sir, if you still get messages here, I was curious. What wire did you use for the windings on the core that you created? I listened several times and do not believe I heard it. Thank you so much for taking your time to reply.
A current transformer arrangement, identical in concept to those used in power distribution, except this one is for RF!! I am going for a stupid comment record here: 0:05 - As long as you're not doing a HowToBasic video in your lab. I would cry. 3:29 - Indeed yes, everybody's heard about the bird. watch?v=aPrtFxd9u9Y
How do you have your scope setup at the beginning of the video? i built this project and my wave forms look a bit different when modulated than yours did. Thanks for the neat design by the way. I have been looking to build something like this for a while and your circuit looked very simple yet flexible.
+afleak (KD0YTE) Hi Alex, well nothing special just to get a nice pattern only by try and error. I recorded a SSB pattern, may be you tried another mode?? Hope that helps..73
Hi Peter, I cheated and made a separate output for my scope from my isolated SWR Meter Header box . I could then observe the RF into or out of the mobile Amp. This was for my /M CB setup before I got my ticket.
Thank you for making this. hand made test gear is always nice to have. Very well explained and its purposes shown. Could you expand on it and add some type of visual indicator to it like the Bird unit? (Im Subscribed!)
hi sometimes we have a rf signal that it's not repeatitive sampling this signals requires a very high samle rate analog to digital converters how can we downconvert this not repeatitive signals and use low sample rate analog to digital converters ? is there anyway?
I don't understand. The through conductor is not coaxial. Therefore, it's a step impedance change in the transmission line. Won't it send strong reflections back into the radio? How does this project avoid doing more harm than good?
Could you put a short (very inefficient) antenna on the scope input (or frequency counter or spectrum analyser or whatever) and simply Tx the transmitter close by? May be necessary to vary the distance between the two but should pick up enough signal to get a trace/frequency readout etc?
I was measuring the power output of my CB Radio simply by directly connecting my oscilloscope's probe to the dummy load. I figured that the voltage is just about 20 volts and well within the frequency range of the scope. Basically I measured the power output exactly like I measured it on audio amps, just with a different sine wave frequency (27MHz instead of 400Hz) and dummy load resistance (50ohms instead of 4ohms). So, is there something I'm missing? I understand that if you go near 50w of output power the voltages become dangerous to the scope. But couldn't I simply use a 100:1 Probe? Or does connecting the probe directly mess with the SWR? Is using an RF tap just a convenience? Or even just a well honored tradition?
Peter. Did I understand correctly that I can use this to connect hf radio to my spectrum analyzer. Without attenuation? I understand that there are a lot of parameters to be aware of.
Yes, in principle you understood that completely correctly, but it would be good to check, once you have finished the sampler, whether the maximum attenuation of this sampler actually reaches at least 30 dB. Please remember that your spectrum analyzer is a very sensitive device that can be quickly destroyed.
This is a great project Peter, thank you so much! Love your videos, very detailed. What would you do differently to make the device have relatively flat response from 1 to 512 MHz? N connectors for sure, but I'm wondering will the wire and toroid work at UHF?
The RF tap you have going to the Millivolt db meter,is it the same as the built unit other than not variable? Also is there a way I can use my Leader LBO-310A to test CB Radios with,do I need anything special to use it.
18:13 Ha, that's not a 50ohm resistor, that's only 47ohms. And what does that additional resistor across the potentiometer do? It looks to be 15ohms or something like it.
I am building one of these samplers myself. Most all I understand. Got me Rigol products for test and measure. Was there 50 ohm terminator on scope? I could not see. Second, more important.... Can I put this sampler directly on the back of dummy load with a watt meter and use a short coax for connection to transmitter? How much coax effect? This me much easy for connecting and testing radios.
John Cundiss Hello John. The basic thing with RF wiring is that cable lengths only really matter when the wavelength of your signals approaches that of your cable. For example at 3mhz your wavelength is around 80m so a couple of meters of cable won’t effect anything. However if you working at 145 MHz your wavelength is no 2m and cable lengths have an affect and correct termination become more important. If your working in GHz everything matter. So for working in the HF bands provided you use good quality cables and connectors and terminate reasonably carefully your going to be fine. Hope this simplified explanation helps.
Has helped some and does make sense. Thank you. Built my box and got a nice flat response from the Rigol up to around 80 Mhz and that is more than good for me currently. Yea very true, the highr the frequency, the more things get very "touchy".
thx for the great video - where can I get such a metal boxes ? This will be my first project in electronics ... thx for sharing. Can I directly build a wattmeter into the box as well ? Which cheap components could I use and how could I calibrate it without osci etc.
TRXBENCH, Can you suggest a different resistor combination ? A 22 ohm wire wound pot is rather odd, I'm trying to build your project without special ordering parts. Great videos and thanks !!
+Phil Spargo Hi Phil, well you can go down with the pot to let me say 18Ohm but you need something rough. If you can get a pot with more power just use it. The wire wound is simply the cheapest solution. But again you can use what you want material wise. Hope that helps. 73
Hi Peter can you put together a parts list of your projects. It will be great if you can just for reference.... Great job my friend. I will be building the project soon myself....
+Chris „Sir Cable“ Ortiz Hi Chris, not completely sure what you mean. What is missing in my schematic? Thanks for watching and good luck with the project.. 73Peter
Great video enjoyed I also build one right along with you works as u said 100 watts max and resistor s in series I liked the pot. To adjust. Tnx waiting for the next one lol tnx
Good one Peter. I plan to build one. Question! Do you see any problem with installing an additional toroid for VHF frequencies and using a selector switch to switch between them. Keep up the good videos. I really look forward to them. 73s, Dave
+wb8vqv Hi Dave, well this unit is designed to work up to 30MHZ if you go over 100MHZ it becomes critical as all frequency above 100MHZ needs a special handling. All is getting worse if you have a switch in between... no way with 100MHZ. It is of course possible but it needs to be designed different. Hope that helps 73
Hi Peter, in watching the vid a few times I see that there is mention of a 22 ohm resister. I have looked for the schematic that people mentioned but no where do I see that resister. Can you point it out to me.....confused i'm just not finding it.. Thanks I frequent your vidio's quite frequently.
Did you by chance check your coil with an inductance meter to see the result. I used a 22 gauge wire and got 25 actual coils on the outside of the core and it gave me 5.35uh and was able to use the center conductor from a piece of 58U Coax with a good fit.
+TRXBench Peter most audio applications the impedance is around 600 ohm? You state that this will not work because it is not good for low impedance, but the 600 ohm is higher than 50 ohm?
+Doctor Forbin yes supposing you are talking about PA output, as this application is designed for RF output around 100W. 600Ohm is the input impedance of audio applications with low level output...
I saw in Ine of your later video's test you had a stabilblock instrument? Right? Or EM i mistaken, IG you have one, would you demonstrate IT for us? I have one here But i'm not so known to it
+Doctor Forbin Well there are some dependences in RF circuits but to make a long story short let me try to simplify as much as possible. We have to fight with changing independences over the frequency, with stray losses and saturation issues this and some more effects makes it nearly impossible to control it without a toroid. As I said this answer is simplified but may give an idea on the hole challenge. 73
I'm confused about the 50 ohms in line series resistor as a matching device. My understanding is that a spectrum analyzer will have a 50 ohm load on the input in the analyzer and with max output of less than 1W that would be okay for most analyzers. For an oscilloscope with high impedance input then the current drive at 10 dBm could create a high voltage on the input so it would need to be pre-loaded. Aren't the 22 ohm resistors in parallel performing the actual loading to limit the potential output voltage?
+W3AMD US Hi John, oh be careful by far not all analysers can take 1W=30dBm and if they could do you are close to the rated maximum which will already create intermodulation. So never feed a SpA with that high input power!!! This game is all about Ohms law and inner resistors of a source and termination a source with a load. I would recommend you to watch my video about the Siglent SDG 1025. Although it is a product introduction I show a bit about the inner resistor and termination. 73
+TRXBench Hi Peter, I reviewed the other video. I can see why we have this conclusion. I think though that the Siglent SDG 1025 doesn't have a series 50 ohm resistor inline but is just doing math based on expected dBm to load impedance and then sets a digital to analog voltage output based on the expected load. Am I still wrong? Do signal generators and spectrum analyzers have both a series resistor inline on the output and a load resistor of 50 ohms on the input of the spectrum analyzer? This would cause half the voltage on the measuring circuit because there is a half voltage divider circuit created?
+W3AMD US Now you are right all sources like generators have a series resistor along with it's source and all SpA have a termination resistor to ground. In this network both resistors are in series and thus the voltage is split 50:50. This is called power adjustment. 73 Peter
+TRXBench Okay let's see if I am right again Peter. Danke for your answers. I think radio TX section to the antenna does not have 50 ohms in series and the radio RX section has a termination resistor to ground? This is what confused me because I assume the radio transmit is direct to the antenna so power is not wasted in a series resistor. Merry Chrismas!
+W3AMD US Ahh John now I see what you are struggling with. You should not consider the 50 Ohm to be a real resistor it is more a complex component of the TX amplifier. Any Transistor with it's inner output resistor and all the components around needs to be designed to be at least 50Ohm. A tube amplifier needs a transformer in the outputstage to convert the high inner resistor of a tube into the 50 Ohm needed at the coaxconnector. The same is valid for a RX and yes there is a (complex) 50 Ohm resistor to ground. Hope that helps. Merry Christmas! 73
Neat project! I've been inactive in amature radio for a while now, but interested in getting back into it, so I'm getting ready to upgrade my ticket. Could someone fill in a few build details for me? I seem to count 13 turns on the core. What would a recommended core be? I have a couple small ones sitting on the bench now, but am not sure if they would be suitable for this build. I also believe I saw that the pot was a 10K ohm. Would this be linear or log taper? And lastly, it was hard on my screen to see what the value of the parallel resistor to the pot was. I'm kinda leaning towards 15 ohms, but the second color band was hard to see clearly. These appear to be maybe 1 or 2 watt resistors - is that something I should be concerned about? I think I would like to really run with this design and include a single pole, multi throw switch where I can have a calibrated fixed attenuation for each band, plus a variable attenuation option as well. Thanks in advance for any suggestions! 73's KF4JXP
+Donald Ohse (W5DRO) Hi Donald, this is a RF current transformer and we need to keep the impedance low to get together with the 47Ohm series resistor a more or less stable 50Ohm output over the entire frequency rage. Hope that helps 73
Hi Peter ... I will be building this kit … could you please tell me the requirements (toroid size, pot, resistors, wire for toroid … ) Hope you can help me Peter … Mike M0csi ...
Nice project Peter! I use a few of this design (slight variations) in my AM setup. I directly power headphones so I can hear my final audio... As you pointed out, also great for driving scopes :^)
+Mr Carlson's Lab Hi Paul, thank you so much! Yeah with a AM set up it is much easier as the demodulator is very easy to realise. For SSB it is a bit more effort.. Anyway enjoy a happy advent! 73
I built this earlier today! I've tried different types I've found online and this design works the best on my rigol scope. Very happy with it
Use a box with a lid so all soldering can be done easier. Stay with metal. Use a copper strap across the bottom to connect the ground side. The box has all kinds of "floating" grounding you have used. The BNC is grounded, so take advantage or that and design a proper voltage divider network. Use a coax cable and keep the shield on it except where the IRON Core toroid not a ferrite goes. Ground each end of the shield as close to the toroid as possible and at each rf connector. Use polymide tape and build up the diameter so the torrid is a snug fit and will stay in place. Use non inductive resistor for the divider network. Do not use a wire-wound resistor anywhere, especially as a trim resistor. Why is everyone still using UHF connectors. They reflect RF as low as 100 MHz. I change everything to N Type, even all my radios. Use good ones from Amphenol or King with a white bronze coating. It will not tarnish like silver. While you're at it add an AM detector to it. You will need a shield between the 2 circuits. Ig you want to go above the HF bands, you will need to use SMT and keep all leads as short as possible around the divider network and maybe shield it also if you go to 1 gig.
Build one and show us. It is childish when Johnny-come-lately know-it-alls show up on tutorial videos like this trying to show how much they know.
I was going to say it’s not the easiest way to make an rf sampler but the fact it’s adjustable is a winner. I am making some videos myself on playing with RF test gear and I enjoy construction projects so will have to give this design a try. As always thanks for sharing.
Thanks for feed back and good luck with the project! 73
TRX Bench I will be uploading my video using a simple loop in a dummy load housing later this week. When I investigated the frequency response of my rf sample it was a bit disappointing with a high pass response and 30 dB difference in attenuation between 2 and 145mhz. What was the response of your transformer coupled sampler. The idea behind my short video series will be how not to destroy your front end. My best regards Chris. I made a boob measuring a second harmonic as I had not included for the frequency response of my sampler. I would love to hear your thoughts on this and measurement errors in a future video. My very best regards Chris AKA all the gear and no idea!
Thanks again for taking the time to do this video. Very nice simple and useful project!
Hello Peter do you know how
Many ohms is that pot you used ? Thanks
Nice project, Peter. I would have built this if I hadn't bought a Kenwood SM-220 Station Monitor earlier this year. I still enjoyed watching the video. Thanks!
+Beretta96Dan Thanks for feed back! Glad that you still enjoy my videos.. 73
Absolutely terrific! I have been thinking of one of these for a long time. The ones available on the market are just too expensive. This is a real handy project. Thanks so much for the very useful contribution.
+Satellite_Guy Hi there, thank you very much! Yes it is really a practical little device. Have a nice X-mas! 73 Peter
Nice project Peter. I have about 5 different types of these samplers. Really comes in handy. Thanks for sharing my friend.
+The Radio Shop Thanks Buddy, yeah I was sure that you have this kind of lab gear :^) Take care 73
It's funny how things go, but I was just thinking of building some kind of device to pick off a sample signal from my transmitter for monitoring. This will certainly meet my needs. Thanks Peter
+DALE BROOKS Hi Dales, very glad that you have a need for my vid! Thanks for comment 73 Peter
Nice 10:1 I think the hardest part was soldering that last connection lol and finding an enclosure! Really enjoyed this video, Thanks for making this! 73
+su pyrow LOL yes you are right. Thanks for feed back! 73!
Great project here Peter.. Thanks for the great explanation, diagrams and testing of it.
Cheers
John
+orbiter8 (John) Hello John, thank you very much! Have a great season holiday! Cheers Peter
Nicely done Peter. If I didn't already have a Bird tap and several others I'd be warming up the soldering iron! Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! 73 - Dino KL0S
+Dino Papas Hi Dino, thanks you! Yes I was sure that you already have such a device :^). Merry Christmas and Happy new year to you and yours! 73 Peter
Great video. I really enjoy all your videos and I plan on building this project soon. I have built one in the past using a slightly different design, but this one looks very good. Thank you for the video. I always look forward to watching more videos from you!
+Nicholas Hyer Hi Nicholas, thanks for feed back, glad that you like my videos! Good luck for the project. 73
great video
I like seeing home build projects
thank you Peter
+DENNIS N Thank you Dennis!!
Hi Peter, what value resistor did you put across the POT? I see the 50ohm connecting to the bnc but I don't believe you mentioned the value on the pot.
Just noticed the FT-747 on the bench just watched a new video #107 on The Radio Shop with you friend Buddy about the bad vari-caps on the back of the Radio that are know for failure on that radio. They are 90 degree angle and looks like good quality ones cannot be found with the 90 or as some say right angle mounting and improvised mounting is required.
Simple, effective and a much needed device. Thanks for sharing. One question, do the resistors have to be non-inductive? I have a bunch of 50ohms lying around, how can I test whether they are inductive or not?
Ok, I was quick to ask. At the end of the video you say "metal film" which should be non-inductive. :-)
yes that is the answer 73
You're an awesome teacher. BTW, how many turns did you put on the ferrite core, or does it matter?
As more turns as more voltage. You can experiment...
What's the value of all resistors, including the pot? I can't tell if it's a rheostat or potentiometer. Difficult to see connections in camera view.
Very helpful video. Thanks for sharing your expertise!
Could we get a parts list or possibly a schematic for this? What size core, what material and how many turns?
I'll send you the small addition , Peter to show on channel 2 the audio without RF, so you can see both. Very simple.
Very good always helpful for the community 73
Personally I would put all components on one side only and put feet on what you have used as a lid. Makes assembly much easier. Useful video though. The formula for the number of turns verses attenuation of the sample would have been useful but is available on another video on youtube.
Nice video 73 from baghdad de Yi1hxh .
Thank you Rafat. All the best 73
Cool project Peter.
In your case:
Ferrite core is T20?
What is the pot value and the paralell resistor on it?
Thanks
Claudio / OA4BMG
sadly peter didn't mention the value of the pot, when i calculate 2x22ohm paralell i get 11. somethig ohm???, what is the value of the pot ,gues paralell whit the 22ohm should be 470ohm in paralel whit 22ohm, you get 22
Excellent Video as ALWAYS! Thanks so much for you work. Would this be OK for 1.5 K watts?
+TheMidnightrdr Hi, thanks for stopping by. No this device is designed for 100W max it will work for a short while with 200W but not more. Hope that helps 73
I would have guessed an impedance bump , going through the box to dummy load ?
My reasoning is the dimensions of RF path , coax impedance is partially made up by the dimensions between dielectrics ?
Thanks again John
+KD0CAC Hi, yes you are right this is valid for coax cables. In this case it is no problem as we are far below critical frequencies where it indeed matters. Thanks for comment 73
This is nice for hf... what about uhf and vhf ?
Hi , have you a video on that little tone mixing box you have coming off your Siglent signal generator ?
😊
Why are you using a wire wound resistor (pot)? This adds unwanted inductance. Also where did you find a 22 ohm pot? I checked and they are unobtainable, at least I couldn't fine one.
Nice. What is the model number of the tap you have going to your db meter...thinking of getting the same meter to set my variable bird RF sampler to -40dbm
Excellent. How do you know how many turns of wire to put on the ferrite ring?
+Barnekkid Hi, we could calculate it but we don't need it here as it is simple as it can be.Just do some windings and check the output voltage. If it is okay for your needs fine if not put some more on the core. Check the output power over the frequency is it flat fine if not take another core material or put more windings for more induction. I only try to keep it simple of course we can handle this via maths as well. 73
Peter nice video, I was actually considering do this very thing, so thanks for confirming my approach. One thing I saw in your video is sitting odd with me. You design the tap with a 50 ohm source resistance then you directly terminated it to the oscilloscope which is a high impedance port and when you did the power measurement with the Rohde & Schwarz URV5 you terminated to 50 ohm load and took a bridge measurement, which depending on the probe that you used makes sense but should you also done the same with oscilloscope ?
+Michael Katt Hi Michael, yes of course you are right! To get the right figures you need to terminate it with 50 Ohm as I did it with my URV5. If you need to get an accurate measurement on your scope you need to terminate it with 50 Ohm. For my demonstration it was not necessary so I was able to skip it and only terminated the source with 1MOhm with the result of doubling the output voltage. Thanks for comment 73
Wow !! great job Peter. I like your Rhode & Schwarz URV5 milivoltmeter and I wonder if there is an equivalent modern device that can do the same functions?
+Qasim Seeha Hi Qasim, thanks for feed-back. Well a more modern meter is right above the URV5 and it is the R&S URV35. All the best Cheers
Have you built an RF wattmeter, and if so, would you share its design with us?
Nice Video, nice project! Would it be possible to directly use this tiny tool, to measure the output harmonics of an home brewed transmtiter? Or should one better use an dummy load, with an -40 dB output to connect the Analyzer/ Scope to? Thanks.
+MrVertigo1971 Hi, yes that is possible as the harmonic test is a relative measurement to the carrier (dbc). Therefore you can use this device. But if you need 100% accuracy you need to take a dummy load with a precision test output level with a flat gain over the entire bandwidth. Hope that helps.. 73s
+TRXBench It helps indeed. Thanks a lot for your valuable feedback
Seems an interesting project.
I am curious Does the measurement accuracy change with a 50 ohm load going into a 1 M-ohm termination?
Great video 👍
Sir, if you still get messages here, I was curious. What wire did you use for the windings on the core that you created? I listened several times and do not believe I heard it. Thank you so much for taking your time to reply.
A current transformer arrangement, identical in concept to those used in power distribution, except this one is for RF!!
I am going for a stupid comment record here:
0:05 - As long as you're not doing a HowToBasic video in your lab. I would cry.
3:29 - Indeed yes, everybody's heard about the bird. watch?v=aPrtFxd9u9Y
+Godfrey Poon LOL The video is excellent :-) Here is the complete link ua-cam.com/video/aPrtFxd9u9Y/v-deo.html like it .
Great little project.
Except for the coax connectors, I everything in my junk box.
Thanks
How do you have your scope setup at the beginning of the video? i built this project and my wave forms look a bit different when modulated than yours did. Thanks for the neat design by the way. I have been looking to build something like this for a while and your circuit looked very simple yet flexible.
+afleak (KD0YTE) Hi Alex, well nothing special just to get a nice pattern only by try and error. I recorded a SSB pattern, may be you tried another mode?? Hope that helps..73
Hi Peter,
I cheated and made a separate output for my scope from my isolated SWR Meter Header box . I could then observe the RF into or out of the mobile Amp. This was for my /M CB setup before I got my ticket.
Ah very good project...Thanks for comment 73
what torroid is this? .....does it matter if its a certain type ....I know I have some 240's but Im guessing thats too big
Great video! What would have to change to make this capable on 1KW? 73's. WA3O
Thank you for making this. hand made test gear is always nice to have. Very well explained and its purposes shown. Could you expand on it and add some type of visual indicator to it like the Bird unit? (Im Subscribed!)
Thanks for sub! Well it can be expanded but for me it is to time consuming as I have to handle a huge back log :^) Thanks for watching 73
hi sometimes we have a rf signal that it's not repeatitive sampling this signals requires a very high samle rate analog to digital converters how can we downconvert this not repeatitive signals and use low sample rate analog to digital converters ? is there anyway?
K5LYT I put a say, 1mH R.F. choke across my scope probe to eliminate the AC hum, and hang some wire on the scope probe.
S11 S21 ?
Insertion loss?
Characteristic impediance?
I don't understand. The through conductor is not coaxial. Therefore, it's a step impedance change in the transmission line. Won't it send strong reflections back into the radio? How does this project avoid doing more harm than good?
Very nice explanation, great lab, thank you.
Could you put a short (very inefficient) antenna on the scope input (or frequency counter or spectrum analyser or whatever) and simply Tx the transmitter close by? May be necessary to vary the distance between the two but should pick up enough signal to get a trace/frequency readout etc?
I was measuring the power output of my CB Radio simply by directly connecting my oscilloscope's probe to the dummy load. I figured that the voltage is just about 20 volts and well within the frequency range of the scope. Basically I measured the power output exactly like I measured it on audio amps, just with a different sine wave frequency (27MHz instead of 400Hz) and dummy load resistance (50ohms instead of 4ohms). So, is there something I'm missing? I understand that if you go near 50w of output power the voltages become dangerous to the scope. But couldn't I simply use a 100:1 Probe? Or does connecting the probe directly mess with the SWR? Is using an RF tap just a convenience? Or even just a well honored tradition?
Peter. Did I understand correctly that I can use this to connect hf radio to my spectrum analyzer. Without attenuation? I understand that there are a lot of parameters to be aware of.
Yes, in principle you understood that completely correctly, but it would be good to check, once you have finished the sampler, whether the maximum attenuation of this sampler actually reaches at least 30 dB. Please remember that your spectrum analyzer is a very sensitive device that can be quickly destroyed.
@TRXLab
Thanks Peter.
This is a great project Peter, thank you so much! Love your videos, very detailed.
What would you do differently to make the device have relatively flat response from 1 to 512 MHz? N connectors for sure, but I'm wondering will the wire and toroid work at UHF?
Sis widdeo!
Thanks, very helpful! Saved me the work of figuring it out.
Thanks for watching 73
The RF tap you have going to the Millivolt db meter,is it the same as the built unit other than not variable? Also is there a way I can use my Leader LBO-310A to test CB Radios with,do I need anything special to use it.
18:13 Ha, that's not a 50ohm resistor, that's only 47ohms. And what does that additional resistor across the potentiometer do? It looks to be 15ohms or something like it.
Hi, Peter. My sniffer has two outputs, the first to show RF and audio, and audio on its own.
yeah with an additional demodulator diode..can be added here as well..73
I'm new to your YT page. I notice you work on alot of Amateur radios. Are you a Licensed HAM? ~ KG5SPB
hi peter one question, are the pot and resistor both 22ohm?
I am building one of these samplers myself. Most all I understand. Got me Rigol products for test and measure. Was there 50 ohm terminator on scope? I could not see. Second, more important.... Can I put this sampler directly on the back of dummy load with a watt meter and use a short coax for connection to transmitter? How much coax effect? This me much easy for connecting and testing radios.
John Cundiss Hello John. The basic thing with RF wiring is that cable lengths only really matter when the wavelength of your signals approaches that of your cable. For example at 3mhz your wavelength is around 80m so a couple of meters of cable won’t effect anything. However if you working at 145 MHz your wavelength is no 2m and cable lengths have an affect and correct termination become more important. If your working in GHz everything matter. So for working in the HF bands provided you use good quality cables and connectors and terminate reasonably carefully your going to be fine. Hope this simplified explanation helps.
Has helped some and does make sense. Thank you. Built my box and got a nice flat response from the Rigol up to around 80 Mhz and that is more than good for me currently. Yea very true, the highr the frequency, the more things get very "touchy".
thx for the great video - where can I get such a metal boxes ? This will be my first project in electronics ... thx for sharing. Can I directly build a wattmeter into the box as well ? Which cheap components could I use and how could I calibrate it without osci etc.
Good luck with the project Stephan. Boxes? reichelt.de buerklin.de conrad.de and so on... 73
TRXBENCH, Can you suggest a different resistor combination ? A 22 ohm wire wound pot is rather odd, I'm trying to build your project without special ordering parts. Great videos and thanks !!
+Phil Spargo Hi Phil, well you can go down with the pot to let me say 18Ohm but you need something rough. If you can get a pot with more power just use it. The wire wound is simply the cheapest solution. But again you can use what you want material wise. Hope that helps. 73
@@TRXLab Is the pot 22R or 220R
Hi Peter can you put together a parts list of your projects. It will be great if you can just for reference....
Great job my friend. I will be building the project soon myself....
+Chris „Sir Cable“ Ortiz Hi Chris, not completely sure what you mean. What is missing in my schematic? Thanks for watching and good luck with the project.. 73Peter
+TRXBench sorry I was really tired when I typed this.. hahaha It's hell getting old...... 73 my friend
+Chris „Sir Cable“ Ortiz no problem Chris never mind. Hav fun with the project and have a nice x-mas. 73
What is the value of the Pot and the resistor across the pot. Tim W8RNG Ohio USA
22 Ohm potentiometer, and 2 resistors 50 Ohm and 22Ohm in parallel with potentiometer.
Great video and project. i want to build one of these but having trouble locating a 22 ohm potentiometer. Can you help me with a link?
Great video enjoyed I also build one right along with you works as u said 100 watts max and resistor s in series I liked the pot. To adjust. Tnx waiting for the next one lol tnx
+Ray Burgess Hi Ray, thanks for watching! I'm glad that you like my videos stay tuned much more to come in the future. 73
Good one Peter. I plan to build one. Question! Do you see any problem with installing an additional toroid for VHF frequencies and using a selector switch to switch between them. Keep up the good videos. I really look forward to them. 73s, Dave
+wb8vqv Hi Dave, well this unit is designed to work up to 30MHZ if you go over 100MHZ it becomes critical as all frequency above 100MHZ needs a special handling. All is getting worse if you have a switch in between... no way with 100MHZ. It is of course possible but it needs to be designed different. Hope that helps 73
Another great vid, and saved me some money too.....Cheers.....
+gripper021164 Thanks for stopping by and watching.. All the best
Where do you find an affordable 200 ohm wire wound pot ????
The resistor value can vary and don't need to be exact 200Ohm
Back again Peter,, what is you circuit diagram for combining you two tone your little box connected to your function generator,,, thanks for help
Hi Dennis, back again?? The combiner is basically a wheatstone bridge...I guess I need to show it....73
sure would like to see, I am using a summing circuit now just 2 1 k resistors,, thank you Peter
Is this also a good way to hook up to a frequency counter?
Nice project. Thanks Peter.
+Robert Calk Jr. Thank you very much Robert! Have a nice season holiday! 73
+TRXBench
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
Hi Peter, in watching the vid a few times I see that there is mention of a 22 ohm resister. I have looked for the schematic that people mentioned but no where do I see that resister. Can you point it out to me.....confused i'm just not finding it.. Thanks I frequent your vidio's quite frequently.
At 42:10 you see the schematic and where the resistor is located...
Character In the video It's great, I like it a lot $$
excellent! refined and simple.
+knarfarious Thanks for feed back. 73
Did you by chance check your coil with an inductance meter to see the result. I used a 22 gauge wire and got 25 actual coils on the outside of the core and it gave me 5.35uh and was able to use the center conductor from a piece of 58U Coax with a good fit.
Hi William, it is not so important to check the inductance as long the core does not go into saturation. 73
Thank you very much,Sincerely William C. Colvin.
Hey , for what frequency range can. use it ?
Great job
nice video peter....Would the coupling be sufficient to use this for testing audio power amps?
+Doctor Forbin Hi, no this unit is developed for 50Ohm circuits. Not good for low impedance stuff. 73
+TRXBench Peter most audio applications the impedance is around 600 ohm? You state that this will not work because it is not good for low impedance, but the 600 ohm is higher than 50 ohm?
+Doctor Forbin yes supposing you are talking about PA output, as this application is designed for RF output around 100W. 600Ohm is the input impedance of audio applications with low level output...
What is the number of the ferrite core you could use in this project ?
Take what you have in your tinker box put some windings on and try if the output voltage is okay. If not put more windings on or take another core...
I saw in Ine of your later video's test you had a stabilblock instrument? Right? Or EM i mistaken, IG you have one, would you demonstrate IT for us? I have one here But i'm not so known to it
Yes you are right it is a stabilock but it is not working sorry
What's the box Part number?
Peter, Why is the response flatter when using the toroid rather than just winding the wire around? you never really explain this.
+Doctor Forbin Well there are some dependences in RF circuits but to make a long story short let me try to simplify as much as possible. We have to fight with changing independences over the frequency, with stray losses and saturation issues this and some more effects makes it nearly impossible to control it without a toroid. As I said this answer is simplified but may give an idea on the hole challenge. 73
Nice, The core T60/2 I can ordered 2 on amazon. And what size wire to use on the core?
+JEFFREY SMYTHE Hi Jeffry, You can take what you have it is not so critical. Thanks for watching 73
I'm confused about the 50 ohms in line series resistor as a matching device. My understanding is that a spectrum analyzer will have a 50 ohm load on the input in the analyzer and with max output of less than 1W that would be okay for most analyzers. For an oscilloscope with high impedance input then the current drive at 10 dBm could create a high voltage on the input so it would need to be pre-loaded. Aren't the 22 ohm resistors in parallel performing the actual loading to limit the potential output voltage?
+W3AMD US Hi John, oh be careful by far not all analysers can take 1W=30dBm and if they could do you are close to the rated maximum which will already create intermodulation. So never feed a SpA with that high input power!!! This game is all about Ohms law and inner resistors of a source and termination a source with a load. I would recommend you to watch my video about the Siglent SDG 1025. Although it is a product introduction I show a bit about the inner resistor and termination. 73
+TRXBench Hi Peter, I reviewed the other video. I can see why we have this conclusion. I think though that the Siglent SDG 1025 doesn't have a series 50 ohm resistor inline but is just doing math based on expected dBm to load impedance and then sets a digital to analog voltage output based on the expected load. Am I still wrong? Do signal generators and spectrum analyzers have both a series resistor inline on the output and a load resistor of 50 ohms on the input of the spectrum analyzer? This would cause half the voltage on the measuring circuit because there is a half voltage divider circuit created?
+W3AMD US Now you are right all sources like generators have a series resistor along with it's source and all SpA have a termination resistor to ground. In this network both resistors are in series and thus the voltage is split 50:50. This is called power adjustment. 73 Peter
+TRXBench Okay let's see if I am right again Peter. Danke for your answers. I think radio TX section to the antenna does not have 50 ohms in series and the radio RX section has a termination resistor to ground? This is what confused me because I assume the radio transmit is direct to the antenna so power is not wasted in a series resistor. Merry Chrismas!
+W3AMD US Ahh John now I see what you are struggling with. You should not consider the 50 Ohm to be a real resistor it is more a complex component of the TX amplifier. Any Transistor with it's inner output resistor and all the components around needs to be designed to be at least 50Ohm. A tube amplifier needs a transformer in the outputstage to convert the high inner resistor of a tube into the 50 Ohm needed at the coaxconnector. The same is valid for a RX and yes there is a (complex) 50 Ohm resistor to ground. Hope that helps. Merry Christmas! 73
Nice and simple!
+David Gillooly Thank you David! 73
Where can i find a 22 ohm wire wound potentiometer. The close i can get is a 25 ohm.
No problem Richard you can take the 25 as well 73
@@TRXLab
Thanks Peter.
Great videos. Thanks for taking the time.
Km4ytw
73
Neat project! I've been inactive in amature radio for a while now, but interested in getting back into it, so I'm getting ready to upgrade my ticket. Could someone fill in a few build details for me? I seem to count 13 turns on the core. What would a recommended core be? I have a couple small ones sitting on the bench now, but am not sure if they would be suitable for this build. I also believe I saw that the pot was a 10K ohm. Would this be linear or log taper? And lastly, it was hard on my screen to see what the value of the parallel resistor to the pot was. I'm kinda leaning towards 15 ohms, but the second color band was hard to see clearly. These appear to be maybe 1 or 2 watt resistors - is that something I should be concerned about? I think I would like to really run with this design and include a single pole, multi throw switch where I can have a calibrated fixed attenuation for each band, plus a variable attenuation option as well. Thanks in advance for any suggestions! 73's KF4JXP
Thanks for share , very useful , !!!!!
Thanks for watching Rolando 73
Hi Peter, what is the power range of this sampler?
+Bernd B. Hi Bernd, it was designed for 100W . 73 Peter
Great info like the project
+wade hicks Thanks for feed back . 73
Very nice!!!
So nice
Very nice Peter.
+Gregory West Thank you Gregory! 73
Very nice project, that will be useful for AM. New subscriber, look forward to watching your videos. Bill KB4QAA
+Pelican1984 Hi, thanks for feed back and welcome to my channel! 73
How many turns you have made on your core !? ..i suppose about 10 or 15 wire turns. '73 :)
Hi Alessandro, 10 or 15 as Long you have enough gain at the test port. 73
Okay, I got lost a little with the resistor that is in parallel with the pot. What is the purpose of that resistor? 73 --W5DRO
+Donald Ohse (W5DRO) Hi Donald, this is a RF current transformer and we need to keep the impedance low to get together with the 47Ohm series resistor a more or less stable 50Ohm output over the entire frequency rage. Hope that helps 73
+TRXBench Thank you. By the way. I enjoy your videos. Keep up the good work!
should have supported the box so it didn't have so much strain on connector.
Hi Peter ...
I will be building this kit … could you please tell me the requirements (toroid size, pot, resistors, wire for toroid … ) Hope you can help me Peter … Mike M0csi ...
Hi, Mick. Did you figure out the values?