UNBALANCED - Type 16 - War Thunder
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 тра 2024
- Get 3% Off on the War Thunder Store + DECAL :
bit.ly/3iLtBwh
Get 3% Off on the Enlisted Store :
bit.ly/3lqRLhz
Support my work on Patreon :
/ theeuropeancanadian
Support my work on SubscribeStar :
www.subscribestar.com/tec
Check out the Merch Store :
www.redbubble.com/people/TEC-...
I am part of the War Thunder and Enlisted Content Partnership Program :
warthunder.com/en/media/partne...
All My Social Media Links :
linktr.ee/theeuropeancanadian
We have partnered with Humble Bundle :
www.humblebundle.com/?partner...
We have partnered with Fanatical :
www.fanatical.com/?ref=TheEur...
We have partnered with Chrono.gg :
www.chrono.gg/TECHUB
Send your Replays or Questions here :
britishcanadianman@gmail.com
Music used from:
/ teknoaxe
/ channel
System Specs : Intel Core i7-10700F CPU @ 2.90GHz, 32GB DDR4 @ 3200MHz, EVGA 3070TI FTW3
Hope you enjoy the video and have an amazing day :)
#gaming #news #warthunder - Ігри
Thats a GREAT idea, to have a rising BR going from stock to spaded, unfortunately Gaijin just heard this and start it at the present BR rising to 10.3 when spaded!😂😂
I remember when the standard Type 16 was 9.0. To this day, it is still my most played vehicle and is at the top of my list. Those were great times. I have barely played it at all though lately, as what am I supposed to use with it? Sure re T-2 and Kisarazu are good air picks, but anything else needs to get uptiered.
Need at least another Type 16 that join at 9.7 to give it a usable lineup. New IFV to succeed the Type 89 is also necessary such as new CTWV based on Type 16 but with a 30mm gun.
The C5 would be another Type 16 with some few difference in its external apperance but it would help from continously pushing my 9.3 and 9.0 vehicles into the BR they normally won't have to eventhough the Type 16 was completely fine at 9.3.
Okay begun to play as Russian 4 weeks ago and the vidar is way to good for 8.0 I have the full tank and Hali trees it was nice to use it but agents it wow it’s pain in the ase to deal with
I'm bringing this to the 11.7 matches because this is the best light tank Japan has and it's quite rough
I really enjoy it when it is 9.0 - 9.3, but playing as 9.7? Better team it with type90
I haven't touched it since they gave it a stupid BR. No lineup - no thanks.
I struggle in the wolfpack, but it mnight just be a skill issue, how do you do well in that tank I try ot sit back, scout and snipe but I just get picked off most times before I get into a position or the postition i get into isnt effective
Map knowledge is key, especially for top tier. You can't do it 100% of the time, but follow ravines, and keep yourself in cover for as long as possible. When you're in a position, ONLY have your turret exposed.
I have yet to come across a wolfpack driver that's done this correctly, which is unfortunate
@@dalh598.1 preciate it man
And wrecking the maps specifically to frustrate flankers really limits wheeled vehicles.
Probably the aftermath of the fox
@@Tien-Chi no?? it was waaaay before the fox was even announced
@@n1ght1ngal3 oh. Well, gaijin never seemed to like it regardless. The influx of corridor maps and general game design choices that reflect wot… are kinda scary
The 9.3 Type 16’s absolutely suck. Their no penetrating negative spalling M735 round. Why is a 9.3 tank with 280mm of pen at 9.3 it legitimately makes no sense. You face leopard 2 which are impossible to kill. It makes no sense. It should honestly go back down to 8.7 because there are vehicles in a lower BR that severely outclass its the Only actual thing the Type 16 has going for it is the mobility. Take that away and its an absolute garbage tank that personally I believe doesnt even deserve to be in the game
Xm-1 ix even worse since it's even slower
At 8.7 there is roikat mk1 which is way waaay worse than type 16
@@Dregomz02 dunno why the xm1 is still 9.3 it should be at a max of 9.0 or it should be 8.7
You can kill leo2 through gunner sights lower front plate and breech and m735 is not that bad for spall you just need to be a bit more accurate
@@Grebogoborp Or i could play VRCC/Rooikat 105 and do amazing just by aiming at the hull of the enemy and get the kills
My experience spading the Type 16s was very underwhelming. I really enjoy light tanks but the problem with the Type 16s is they really lack horsepower... they are super sluggish at low speed or up hills. I also really dont like it when a wheeled vehicle has mediocre or bad gun depression (looking at you PTL02) its soooo annoying when you constantly bump into the negative limits after stopping...
The Type 16P really suffers from constant full uptiers. i remember in 100 games i had 3 full downtiers, with the rest being mostly 10.0 or higher. With M735, thats just pain.
Type 93 ammo was cool to have but why use it at 9.7 which means constant 10.3+ games when you can play the same ammo on a more versatile vehicle at 9.0, where you also get an actual line up...
TLDR: Type 16s are meh cause bad matchmaker, gun depression and the lack of line ups.
bro its shit
not
For real
M735 with 292mm pen at 9.3? Wtf they should buff M735 back to its original pen of 353mm
@@BOEING--mh6xmyou're thinking of different vehicles.
@@BOEING--mh6xmTEC is playing the standard Type 16 with the Type 93 shell. The one with ~400mm of pen.
@@BOEING--mh6xm meanwhile british 6.3 charioteer with 363 mm pen