World Trade Center Construction
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 лют 2024
- World Trade Center changed the way skyscrapers are constructed today.
The construction of the first World Trade Center complex in New York City was conceived as an urban renewal project to help revitalize Lower Manhattan spearheaded by David Rockefeller.
SUBSCRIBE and ACTIVATE the 🔔 beside the subscribe button to get the notification!📩 If you have any questions or requests feel free to leave them in the comments below.
For any business relating enquiries please email us at: OneMegaprojects@gmail.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
⚠️Copyright ⓒ OneMegaprojects. Reuse of Video or Audio is Not Allowed.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#onemegaprojects #engineering #worldtradecenter #wtc #twintowers - Розваги
How pissed off would you be as a construction worker that built those?
How pissed do you have to be as a person to know what happened?
They face palm the hardest knowing jet fuel could never
I was a worker at those towers. I was only 16 and got an apprenticeship for welding. One of the workers actually joked about a plane hitting us while we were up there.
could you imagine if there were foreign nationals that work in blue and white collar positions just to report details of vulnerability or intentionally sabotage structures... Perhaps more than one country knew how to do what they did, but just did it first. Damn.@@user-bf4fo2he8v
@@user-bf4fo2he8vdamn.. how high up did you go? Were you in open air? There’s that old picture of the guys sitting on the beam eating lunch. It’s so wild how they do that. My nerves are acting up just thinking about it. lol.
To think for such massive tall buildings it only took 5 years to build and 10 seconds to come down.. unbelievable
THE TRADE TOWER
12 seconds🤓
Yet the passport survived.
And so did some documents. They got blown clear. So what's your point?
@@Normal1855as someone who was born nd raised, worked in NY
The paper mess the following days all over town was beyond anything I’ve ever seen again in my life .
To believe certain information was found in prestine condition, is an act of god . Or something else which many have speculated on .
I’ve since left , never to return all my friends nd family are gone . I know in my soul one day all will know nd feel the answer .
@@Normal1855🤡🤡🤡
@Normal1855 what about the trillion dollars that went missing 😅😂😂😂
@@Normal1855an internal fire with jet fuel & magnesium involved… magnesium fire only starts its burns at more than 3,000 degrees centigrade & you really think that passport survived 😅 you got a goldfish brain lolol
2 floors a week. Damn.
All construction projects are built using borrowed money. The faster it's completed, the faster it starts generating revenue for the developers.
The Empire State Building was erected in an astonishing just 410 days! 😮
And About 100 floors down in 10 seconds 😮😮😮
@@ernesthill4017 Wow it's very fast
As a former construction worker, "reinforcing steel bar specialist" it's normal to finished one floor for 5 or 7 days
They were actually designed to withstand the impact of a plane according to the head architect
Yeah a 707 traveling at 1/2 the speed. But it could not be confirmed by NIST as what that study looked like. However the plane that struck the towers were modern 767s with were 20% larger and traveling at more than twice the speed. The WTC was design and constructed in the 60s when the 707 was the largest plane at the time. They were banking on a plane striking it by accident not on purpose.
@@johne540Well, if don't count the 747...
@@sethmyers5666 ha. Yeah let just leave out the catalyst for the whole thing.
@@johne540I recommend watching the documentary A New Pearl Harbour. It’s a bit difficult to find because it’s shadowbanned but it is still on UA-cam.
The documentary is five hours long and disputes the official narrative made by NIST. It’s definitely worth a watch and everything I fact checked from that documentary turned out to be completely true.
@@johne540 How dare you state facts on a low effort comment!
It's crazy to think that such a massive steel frame was so strong that when it fell down, it caused a whole other building hundreds of yards away to catch fire and fall straight down into its own footprint resembling a controlled demolition.
Those engineers were really impressive
By strong do you mean heavy? Also the buildings are over 1000 feet high so collapsing onto another building a couple hundred yards away not far fetched.
@sams.1597 which tower landed on building 7
@@LeoBaker-ir3vo All of them I guess
Never Forget 911 was an inside job
lol, great comment. Can’t believe all these idiots defending the narrative, scary
This world no longer exist anymore, it's not just the towers.
You're onto something
@@tehabnorm We all have been headed onto something
Truth
Stop trynna be edgy
What?
Its not a Kangaroo Crane, Their Favco Diesel luffing cranes. Yes they are Australian and can climb up in a number of ways. Today its preferred to have them external and when external they can climb themselves back down. When internal of a building you need a recovery crane to dismantle.
Yes the Aussies are brilliant and smart. Also the only nation to have supported The USA in every war its fought since Australia was a nation.
God bless America and Australia
I’d never heard about the kangaroo crane, or known how they work. Subscribed - you have very interesting content, well explained.
They're built
'Down Under'.
I knew about it but I am from Australia and I worked a trade.
they're used on every skyscraper to this day..
that's how the crane always seems taller than the building.
they add sections (normally on the weekend) when there's less people to kill below if the procedure of adding a section goes south
you guys should look into Zachary K Hubbard he writes about how in 1968, WTC construction began the same year, Bush graduated from Yale + Skull & Bones (the secret 322 society). This was also the same year 9-1-1 was made the national emergency dialing code. Who would guess this was the same year Mohammud Atta was born? Also, the NY Jets also won the super bowl that year, similar to the Patriots winning after 9/11 and the Patriot Act. Remember, it was a New York Jet that took out number 11 Drew Bledsoe. (NY, the 11th State, when the massive towers resembled an 11, also it was flight AA-11 that kicked it off).
@@franciscohernandez9724 You can take any event in history and find a bunch of coincidences. I still believe 911 was carried out by Islamist extremists, just like the thousands of other attacks all over the world since the 1970's.
I visited the view deck back in april 1984 on a senior ditch day when i was attending HS in Queens.
Me and a friend got bored and just decided to take the subway into NYC.
I still have pics in my photo album.
That was a good day that i will never forget.
You could see 3 states which was trippy.
I will forever miss the WTC.😢😢😢
"Forever miss the wtc" ? This fits with the other comments, like "a plane couldn't bring it down" etc.
Ancient history. Nobody cares, buddy.
What was his name? Your friend.
@@brownehawk7744Jhonson Kendrick
@@brownehawk7744Osama
They also built the elevator shafts in the cranes wake
*Stairwells
Jet fuel can't melt steel beams.
Planes don’t make buildings built to withstand plane crashes collapse
The day that happened I talked to a structural engineer who had been in the World Trade Center said there’s no way in hell that any of this would’ve ever happened
@@allenmartin7193it was an inside job, my uncle used to work in there and said, there were people installing “things” most likely bombs in the building about 2 days before because there is no way jet fuel can burn to hot to melt metal beams. The government did this to make an excuse to invade those 3 countries for oil and to get rid of Muslim people.
@@allenmartin7193 agreed; everyone who watch the videos know that it was controlled demolition
I don’t know what’s so hard to believe that a raging fire and millions of pounds of weight over it results in collapse. I assume you also don’t believe we landed on the moon, the earth is flat, and Elvis is still alive?
Never knew that learn something new every day.
The same day you’ll stop learning is the same day you’ll be morn.
@@dylanlafreniere3479morn?
In all of History, Only 3 steel structures ever collapsed due to fire. WTC 1, WTC 2 and WTC 7
and that wtc7 coming down was announced about 45 mins before it came down ....by BBC news....damn time zones fkn with the narrative....
It's astounding, how some people insist that we must "believe" the official story, Rather than facts,
What about Meridian tower in Philadelphia in the late 1980’s or early 1990’s.
@@mrbig4532 What about it? The Meridian tower was a literal inferno, but it never collapsed.
@@Decentralized_World1 yeah I know but it was about to if those sprinklers on the 30th floor weren’t installed because those 10 sprinkler heads saved the building from falling down . The city structure engineer and the fire departments chiefsaw severe damage to the main support beam and pulled all the fire fighters out of the building. After the investigation was done and all the engineers from all over the world looked at the damage some thought the structure was safe to repair and recommended the insurance company to approve the funds to repair the building, some of them thought all the floors from the 22 and up had to go there was just too much damage and wrote a letter to the owners of the building stating the damage is to severe to those top floors and they have to go , and the remaining engineers thought the building was a total loss and if not for the sprinklers on the 30th floor they would not be having this discussion because the building was going to collapse.
They Changed how skyscrapers were built TWICE!
My brother was with the Crew that installed the electrical system, and the elevators
Finally a US engineering docu that mentions the aussie engineering that enabled it! This has triggered my engineering dad all throughout my years as I love watching engineering docu's and my dad always calling out the show for not acknowledging an Australian enabled that build to happen lol
It's amazing what men can accomplish around the globe
I remember when they were being built. This was my playground 🙏💖💝😘🌹💯🙂👍
And some people still think an aircraft wing cut through that structural steel.
Well I mean it did, litterly the shape of the plane is seen in the north tower facade. And to mention the planes didn't fly in a straight line into the buildings, they were flying down at a steep incline gaining more speed before leveling out and crashing, you can especially see that in the 2nd plane crash for tower 2
@@mtzak3511 you obviously don't understand the physics of material science.
Aircraft wings have a skin only 2mm thick made from aluminum. The structural steel was INCHES thick. That aluminum skin would have shredded on contact with those beams, not sliced the beams in two.
@@t00by00zer Are you saying your denying that there were planes? Please give your answer to how you think it happened. All I'm saying is, there was a plane shaped hole in the north tower, you can even see where the wings went in. But yes the wing tips themselves did not penetrate the steel, only the outer chrome shell covering it. But where about the engines are and fuselage of the plane, all that went right in. Right threw the steel
Yes. Physics tells us that a 300+ ton plane at speed will pancake when it hits the building, and then fall down the side - as demonstrated in numerous cartoons over the years.
Also don’t forget that there was so much jet fuel on the plane that it burned hot enough to melt the steel so the building fell straight down like a controlled demolition, yet Mohammad Atta’s passport flxuttered down from the collision between plane and building and stayed in such pristine condition that police found it on 9/12 and knew exactly who did what. Also the emergency crews were busy cleaning up the pentagon crash site so that there was never any picture of the plane that crashed into the accounting wing of the pentagon and demolished any chance of auditing the recently (2001) discovered loss of 3 trillion dollars.
According to 1000 architects that building should not have fallen
We were also told the Titanic was "unsinkable".
1,000 architects need remedial education as they are arguing against reality.
Yeah and the news was reporting building 7 collapsing 26 minutes before they pulled it. There's just those that know and those that are still ignorant and tbh I'd rather be one of the ignorant ones. What are you and I gonna do with this knowledge? Nothing. A 2.3 trillion dollar heist in front of our eyes and I'm going to go get some chicken wings now.
according to a few Muslims they disagree
Well we know how...
And aluminum cans took those out. Still don't know how people think a aircraft punched through steel like paper blows my mind.
Jet aircraft are made of a lot of different materials. Jet engines have a lot of titanium and other heavy metals. The landing gear is made of high strength steel alloys. The structure of the plane is made of an aluminum alloy that is many times stronger than the equivalent weight of steel.
The video of the second plane hitting the second tower shows debris coming out of the opposite side of the building.
The structure of the building is designed to hold up the weight of the building under normal temperatures. The high winds and the fuel from the aircraft combine to produce a very high temperature. (do research on how a foundry works) It doesn't have to melt the metal but just soften it. When the beams can no longer support the weight of the structure above it, the upper part of the structure acts like a battering ram and crushes everything below it and consumes itself as it goes down.
If each piece of the structure weighs 50 tons imagine how much weight each piece is holding up! The metal wouldn't have to get very hot before it looses it's integrity and wouldn't be able to support the 1,000's of tons of steel, concrete other building materials, office equipment and people above it.
It's just physics!!
@@Alan-jx7uk good description
ua-cam.com/video/z67IV07PvKU/v-deo.htmlsi=PGx9Bk_7EY1JCYGx
Don't give me all that garbage when the buildings were surrounded by massive thick steel. They took them out by design. All the firefighters saying they saw rivers of molten metal. The explosions in the basements. They had to take it out due to the lost money they wanted to investigate. Same with building 7. No reason it came down. It was controlled demolition.
Too good for the OP to grasp@@lennyhipp
You do know planes weigh like 60 tons, and 60 tons going at even just 300 mph can do some damage. The heat of the fuel fire then weakened the structure just enough so the floors above could collapse under its own weight creating a domino effect on the way down.
And they want us to believe a plane took that building down
Nope, I didn't see it on the news
you guys are so stupid.
And what are you suggesting?
Your brain tumour did
Gee what conspiracy theory do you have?🙄
The American government sweating about this video
Theyre sweating because they see how many fools without physics experience are watching those videos
No whistle-blowers in over 20 years?... you think government is that smart?... wake tf up.
@@markca8937the ammount of dults repeating stupid things they heard on tiktok is laughable
Look at those solid steel beams down the middle
I really doubt they’re solid. Hollow beams are far stronger per pound.
@@benchoflemons398 What you just said was very stoopid
@@SauceOnChickenBall you’ve never built anything if you don’t know this.
Also, I now know for sure that they were hollow.
@benchoflemons398 We aren't talking about inertia, we are talking about a direct high energy hit. This is why a corked bat will break quicker(significantly quicker) than a regular bat.
If Tensile strength, (The actual type of strength we need to survive a plane flying into our beams) solid beams will always be stronger. If you don't know what I'm talking about just Google tensile strength and read up on it. Then read which type of metal beam would be better to absorb that.
@@daviddavidson7747 the tensile and compressive strength of a hollow beam is far better than a solid beam pound for pound for resisting bending moments because the center of the solid beam will never be load bearing unless the metal beam is twisted like stranded wire is… which is isn’t. A hollow thin beam will have even distribution of the load both compressive and tensile. A solid beam will have uneven distribution of load with almost all of the load being taken from the outer portion of the beam and zero from the center.
Hollow beams is the main reason skyscrapers can be built taller today…
When I heard it was called kangaroo crane I knew someone from Australia made it. 😊
He said Australian engineer first so
I got vertigo watching this.
The buildings opened on my birthday and fell on my son's birthday.
Having ur birthday on 9/11 is sad my principles daughter was born on 9/11
@@Kool-aid-official they opened on my birthday April 4th and fell on my first born son's birthday 9-11.
Inside job😢
Your wrong. 😢 Any signifigant evidence can be easily disproven.
@_pday_ Sure, and the jab is safe and not an experiment. They didn't kill JFK. There were wmd's. The H²0 in Flint and everywhere for that matter is fine, on and on and on. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Could you shut up?
@@_pday_nope wrong try again 3 trillion went missing and the very next day this happened thr was very important information in them buildings just like thr was in the one section of the pentagon tht got destroyed
@@edwinnorth5428 The claim about the "missing" $3 trillion originates from a statement made by Donald Rumsfeld, the then-Secretary of Defense, on September 10, 2001. Rumsfeld mentioned that the Pentagon's financial systems were unable to account for approximately $2.3 trillion in transactions. This statement has since been widely circulated and often misinterpreted or exaggerated in various ways, including claims that the money went "missing" or was stolen.
In reality, Rumsfeld was highlighting significant inefficiencies and problems in the Department of Defense's accounting systems, which made it difficult to track and audit all financial transactions accurately. The money was not "missing" in the sense of being stolen or lost but rather was not properly accounted for due to outdated and inadequate financial management systems.
The timing of Rumsfeld's announcement, coming just one day before the 9/11 attacks, has led to various conspiracy theories, but there is no evidence to support any direct connection between the two events. The Department of Defense has since made efforts to improve its financial management and accounting practices to address these issues.
My stomach turns looking at those views and heights
Never forget
It was all an inside jib
CIA
@@valiantgold442jibs everywhere!!!
What happened????
What?
And it only took the Bush administration a Tuesday morning to bring it all down.
The amount of conspiracy theories that it was an inside job in these comments is insane.
@@zdmpe
So is your spelling ability.
Thought Ukrainian trolls were getting better…
@og-greenmachine8623 brother what
@@og-greenmachine8623How does that matter? Conspiracy theorist confused facts with a theory
@@Apollo13Mission
Makes no sense at all.
But I’m sure YOU understand what you said.
All that matters😉
Truly fascinating. I'm originally from Astoria Queens NYC. Miss the Twin Towers, but the New Freedom Tower is a Tank! ♥️👊!
One world trade doesn't compare to the twin towers
Sure am glad that "they" got them billions of dollars of gold out of the basement the day before the towers fell. What luck.....NOT!!!!!!
Proud of Australia for the creation of Kangaroo Cranes.
As a union ironworker,,3rd generation...i appreciate this video ...ive spent the last 28 years building skyscrapers...people ask what i do ...they dont truly understand ...this video gives a glimpse into what i do ....thanks ..local #79 norfolk ,VA.
Jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams
You are correct, it does however warp beams so with all of the weight they were supporting as they began warping they were not able to support it. That’s why the second tower hit fell first because it was mid building.
@@Crosby4lifeyes that makes sense
@@Crosby4life So why was there Molten Steel found if Jet Fuel doesn't Melt Steel?
@@HChartierKJV depends what grade of steel, and what type of jet fuel. For example, Soviet T-34 tank armour grade of 1940-1942 type "MZ-2" could withstand temperatures of 900°
The "precast concrete" where the metal clips where attached crumbled from the heat, resulting a blow out starting a gravity domino effect ...
My Brother and I were there in 1973 as kids saw last sections lifted .
Was up top many times.
My mom grew up in NY and watched them being built over time...then she watched as they were destroyed. Surreal, at the very least.
The amount of people in the comments that still believe 9/11 was a terrorist attack is WILD
it could have gone either way
the amount of people who beileve it was an inside job with *ZERO* evidence supporting the nonsense is batshit crazy. you are a clown
The amount of morons still trying to de-credit literal facts and witness accounts is even more mind boggling.
I love how confidently wrong you are, Dunning-Kruger on full display
Of course it was you muppet
They build it so well that the controlled demolition fell at the speed of gravity…
Gravity isn’t a force.
@@johnnydough8841 and time is an illusion right?
Agreed 😢
What controlled demo. Any proof explosives was used? Nope. Why was the point of impact the point ring failure? Why the need for planes? Please explain.
Watch "loose change" watch 1000's of engineers testimonials...Thermite was used in a controlled demolition...WHY U ASK ?! ....globalist,, world domination...WAKE YOURSELF UP !!@@johne540
Wild how when the World Trade Center fell it caused another building hundreds of feet away to catch fire, and fall straight down resembling a controlled demolition.
And the office of the man that announced 2.3 trillion dollars missing was blown up by another at the building with the most cameras on it in the world, and somehow there’s not one picture of the plane.
And the owner of the building, his family and staff just all happened to call off for the day, so none of them were in the building! Oh plus he had just increased the insurance payout.
@@wombatnation1709yup and not a plane part to be seen
This comment section know too much lol
Thermite melts steel beams…not jet fuel…
Let’s not forget the third smaller tower that went down of sheer pity for the first two. Go look it up, a third tower “fell” just cause it wanted to be fit in.
It's fell do the damage of those massive two falling on it. Science has easily debunked the inside job theory
Wtf7 wasn't even hit by a plane and WTC owner Larry Silverstein went on live tv and slipped up the "pull it" part "then we watched the building collapse" 👀👀👀🤐
@@illuminaus WTC 7 fell because it got pelted by debris from both the towers collapsing and was on fire with critical damage, it's almost like 2 100+ floor buildings falling creates collateral damage and damages other buildings
@@illuminausYup sure did! " We gave the authorization to "Pull" and the fire department"pulled" and watched the build come down." Hmmmmm..... How could a building get demolished, without a prior loading of explosives from a highly qualified demolition crew (CDI Controlled demolition Inc.) to "pull" a building down in its own footprint?
i thought wtc 7 collapsed from fire from the north tower collapse
Never heard it called a kangaroo crane. We always call it boom cranes, or even a boom.
Crikey...that guy was an Aussie? No doubt.
That was build back “when men were men and women were proud of it!”
Changed how they’re deconstructed too OH
Years to build, and it only took 3 minutes for 3 buildings to collapse.
3 minutes??? that can't be right.
It was about 45 minutes and two hours, respectively, if I remember right.
North Tower 9 seconds, South Tower 10 seconds and building 7 was just over 6 seconds.
@jaybee9269 is correct.
The North Tower collapsed 1hr 42 minutes after being hit, and the South Tower 56 minutes.
It was not 3 minutes
And yet somehow fire for the first time in history made both of these steel building collapse in their own footprint. And lets not forget about building 7, think the wind made that one free fall in its own footprint. What a crazy world we live on.
Not just fires made them collapse, structural damage from the plane crashes themselves. And no, the steel didn't melt either. But the remaining steel beams left over from the damaged area from the impact location. Those beams, exterior and core column beams were taking on some extreme heat from the fires. Not melting, but enough to warp and slowly bend the steal. The floors started to sag, causing a inward pull of the exterior columns triggering a collapse. And why it was a full collapse and not a partial, was because those towers didn't have any columns on any floors. Only the exterior (which is why the windows were so thin) and the interior core columns, for utility, elevators/stairs, etc. And each floor truss was connected from the exterior to the core columns. So when the collapse started, this allowed the floors to hit one after the other, breaking away from the exterior and core of the building, over and over. No beams to stop it, and once it hit free fall speed, there was no stopping it. And building 7, people tend to forget how close thay building was to the north tower. Building 7 didn't only suffer fire damage that day. But also an insane amount of structural damage as well, from the collapse of the North tower. Building 7 was bombarded by debris when the north tower came down. There was a gash from the roof going down to the lobby, and the lower you got, the worse the damage was on the south face of building 7. Not to mention building 7 had 47 floors, so that's alot of structural damage. And to add that fires were also breaking out uncontrollably on the lowers floors adding to the weakening of the structure. Not melting, but weakening, warping, bending.
Dude, ever water goes trough steel if it’s going fast enough.
@@kaufmans4144 Building 7 mr. TFG
@@mtzak3511😅 how do you KNOW so much?!
@@quickcad2573he’s been doing backstrokes in the koolaid.
The fact that they took so many years to build and only 12 seconds to come to the ground it’s just crazy. I would be so mad if I was one of the people that built that.
WHOA!💯💯💯
Very interesting & informative thank you 😊
And to take the towers down you ned a lot of termite
Thhhermite. Just in case YT censored that word.
Jet fuel can't melt steel beams
wrong steel melts at 2000degree+heat its not tge melting point the reason its the strentgh and mallibilty of metal you can bend/shape hot metal thus the weight bended the metal till gravity took over now the straight down effect is another science project.
the fema report on the matter never states that the steel melted, the floor slabs expanded and caused stress on the vertical columns, as they got hotter and began to sag reversing the force caused by the initial expansion. eventually a large portion somewhere in the building collapsed as a result of the heat and caused a chain reaction as the floors began falling on each other. the total energy of the floors above the site of impact on wtc1 was 8x10^9 joules, all of that energy was then released on the remaining floors and caused the floors to collapse on each other and accelerate as they got closer to the bottom. thankfully nearly everyone who was in the buildings bellow the impacts was able to evacuate. sadly only 18 of the people above the impact on one of the buildings made it out, it is believed that more found the intact stairwell but were not able to get out of the building before the collapse. a few minutes before the collapse the stairwells were reported to be "relatively clear" i dont know if the remark was in reference to people or not though.
Was literally looking for this comment
@@archsciontrismegistus4194WRONG …. STEEL has a melting point NOT at 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit, but roughly 2,700 degrees Fahrenheit. At room temp and pressure Jet Fuel burns at around 1500 degrees Fahrenheit. There’s NOTHING in ANY office building that burns hot enough independently to MELT steel. Until 9/11/01 there HAD NEVER BEEN A STEEL AND CONCRETE HIGHRISE STRUCTURE EVER COLLAPSE DUE TO ANY FIRE. ON THAT DAY THREE “BURNED TO THE POINT OF COLLAPSE” Never happened before and never happened again. There’s even been a highrise building fire that lasted for over 19 hours and not collpase…
But even to your comment about the weight bending the steel… that is what should have happened, if nothing else. However, if the steel had bent, it is impossible for a vertical free fall into their own footprints. Also, the kinetic energy would NEVER be enough to collapse each floor down onto the other in one full floor… they weren’t designed nor built that way to have allowed that to happen.
@@__ASAAAI hope youre just regurgitating that for no other reason that just because….If not, and you believe what you’ve written, I urge you to go back and read what you wrote, think about it bit by bit, do that again and again until you see the errors in the explanation….
ITS LIKE CRUSHING YOUR SKULL WITH AN ALUMINUM CAN
Aussie Engineering at its best! Proud to be an Aussie 🇦🇺
Lead engineer claimed for years after to anyone that would listen that they were designed to withstand a airplane attack, look it up. Died a few short years after of a heart attack I think
Whoa!!!! That I didn't hear!!
@@invaderzim1265 search it up bro.. it’s the truth. There’s recordings of random People contacting his personal number to ask his thoughts and he would tell anyone that called him his true thoughts, didn’t last very long unfortunately
THE TWIN TOWERS WERE DESIGNED TO TAKE A DIRECT HIT FROM A 707. 😅
Maybe not a 67
*But low flying and lost in the fog. Not a Boeing 767 travelling at a high speed and with enough fuel for a transcontinental flight.
Dunning-Kruger on full display - dumb people can be so confidently wrong that it's hilarious.
50 ton sections and it falls down from an airplane I don't think so
Likely moving near 100 mph
@@eduardomeza7279more like 500
@@eduardomeza7279550mph* try again
DUmmy, it fell because of the fires. DERRRRRRRR
@@eduardomeza7279 closer to 550mph than 100
In 1997 me and my family went to the top floor of the North tower with the diner. It was an astonishing view of the city and miles out on a clear day.. it’s ashame such spiral architecture is gone now.
Aspestos can make buildings very weak.
@@SSK1977FEB so do weak hands..
@@SSK1977FEB the Asbestos**. was coated on the steel beams not made of it. Maybe try to show more respect and quit the unfunny jokes and put your sorrow towards something good.
These two beauties were so iconic. To me it was the face of NYC. I will never forget you
Bros must be pissed their work got destroyed 💀
And they want us to believe that a plane, even the wings, will make a Tom & Jerry hole in that massive construction....
A] A 600,000 pd plane travelling 300 miles an hour will make a hole in anything, and
B] The plane only pierced the outer shell of the building and then disintegrated. FIRE brought down the World Trade Center. The plane certainly didn't go all the way through. There was no bisecting 'hole'. A toddler looking at the video of the crash could have explained this to you
@@PocketMarmo04
I never said it went through, but at least the wings would be shaved off, and most certainly wouldn't make a Tom & Jerry wingspan hole...
Questions everything about September 11th, 2001. Professional commercial airline pilots say that's impossible. The buildings 208 ft wide. Sometimes else hit the two towers and the Pentagon.
@@havardpedersen1138 The wings would not have sheered off before impacting the wall as there was nothing in their way. Furthermore, the wings of aircraft are constructed with one or more spars running the entire length of the wing that gives them extra strength. Unless there are preexisting cracks in these wing spars, they will not be shorn off by the force of the nose impacting the building.
@@zechariahlea2317
Nothing in their way but a steel building.. and planes are made as light as absolutely possible, only to withstand the forces of actually flying, not to get smashed into solid objects.
Some cultures build. Some destroy.
Like the west invaded and destabilized middle east?
Got destroyed by there own
jedi and sith
@@Pinkielover
Democrats are the modern day sith
@@Pinkielover yes the jedi destroyed alot
& 97000 pounds of asbestos too
Which is fire proof 😂
You see that steel? The thickness? Your telling me a normal commercial plane went through that all by itself?
You realize there’s space in between each of the steel beams right? Planes are hollow and will dissipate into tiny fragments upon an impact like that then go out the window of the other side of the building. The plane didn’t go through beams. Plus, the beams get thinner as they got higher on the building since there was less load the higher they went. This made the building much lighter at the top than putting beams the same size from top to bottom.
Yes now shut up and don't question anything buddy
It was even designed to withstand the impact of a passenger jet. Weird right? Lol
Except it wasn’t.
@@jhoughjr1except it was. It was a consideration when designing the structure.
one world trade center, the building built on site that stands today is. the previous world trade center was not.
@@__ASAAAso were the large ones. Look into it. It was a consideration. Not to mention how little anything else involved in the collapse of those towers makes any sense.
@@donaldham308we have hard evidence that a plane hit both buildings and they collapsed as a result. people who say it was a controlled demolition ignore the hard evidence that steel loses its structural integrity at high temperature the same way anything else does.
And yet they both fell at free fall speed into their own footprint.
It’s was not in their own foot print. Lower Manhattan was a mess. It took 8 months to clean it all up. It would have been the worst controlled demo in history. So bad in fact that it took out several surrounding buildings and damaged dozens more.
@@johne540 that is the dumbest comment so far on UA-cam! Congratulations
@@consultant2678 how do you figure. Explain. I was an eye witness to their event. As were million of other people in NY and New Jersey.i had and still have family in the NYPD. My hometown lost over 30 ppl. So please go on and explain how my comment is misplaced or off base. This should be good.
Free fall into their own footprint?how else was it supposed to collapse, one floor at a time?collapse to.the floor below,then repeat 75 times for the south tower then 88 floors for the north tower?
@@Herecomesthethruth Buildings that well designed only fall into their own footprint at free fall speed when the*m1te is used to cut the structural columns in unison. Otherwise the building would have been just damaged and remain standing. Guess just stick to cat videos that’s more your level of comprehension.
So here’s a question, did they just leave one of the cranes at the top at the end? Or do they completely disassemble the last one or what? How do they get the last crane down without other cranes?
They used one crane take down tje others. Then the last crane was rebuilt into a TV/Radio antenna.
No, I'm kidding. I got zero clue how they did it. It's a very good question you got there. 🤔
In the same way that people are pulling their hair to levitate 🤣🤣
I have seen construction in New York and in other cities, they use a large elevator attached to the side of the unfinished building, (like a window washer, but larger and can hold more weight) to slowly lower and raise the cranes. Pretty cool.
And then our own government demolished them and Building 7.
Nope
50 ton sections. and we're supposed to believe just an airplane alone took the entire thing down 🤔
You're the type of person that thinks you can paint a car before it's built.
@@TankEpidemicwhat
Brain damage comment
@@TankEpidemicThe frame and cab of the vehicle is already painted while it enters the assembly line. Making you, incorrect.
Good day.
@@TankEpidemicyou can lol wtf are you on 😂😂
George W Bush knocked down the towers
💀 ☠️ 💀
Give me Proof.
Even I can say dog shit without providing evidence
@@aspectx1588 Correct.
He'll be quiet now.
I think it was more like the ppl behind the government. The shadow government, which his father is a part of. When it was announced that 2.3 trillion was missing, they put the misdirection plan into action.
The major flaw was that they used steel instead on passport paper.
Incredible feat !
Good info to build on
I miss windows of the world ❤❤❤
What gets me is how people are racist if they don't support recognition of diversity today. It's all about identity politics. But bring up 9-11 and suddenly people get ethnicity blindness. We all know what happened.
Yes, inside j0b.
you could argue that "they were bought down by explosives" or better yet "it was a missile, the plane was cgi" which are all disproven by common sense alone, if it was an inside job, it was more political then about how or of the buildings fell or not
They also redefined how you take them down, and how strong passports paper is ☠️
And they were built to withstand an impact with a jet 🤔
yeah......a jet that might fly into it on accident going through fog and slow speeds, not a hijacked one that was going over 300 on a clear day
I’m glad to see that most of the comments are from people who have brains. I have the thick magazine that contains many of the front page headlines from around the world on 911. I bought it as fast as I could because I knew photographic evidence would show up on at least one photo they forgot to scrub. I was right.
What page in "the thick magazine" has the photographic evidence that they forgot to scrub? Asking for a friend.
Someone forgot to drink their meds that's for sure..
It was also built to withstand a plane crash but somehow it came down demolition style
A 707. Not a fully loaded 767.
Cohencidence
Do you realize how much more force a 767 delivers with twice the speed and much more weight than the calculated 707? E = m*v^2
Did you know it's impossible for a 767 to travel at full speed without ripping apart when it's that close to sea level
@Noelsterrr Did you know you're 100% full of it? A 767 will not "rip apart" traveling at "full speed" that close to sea level. Both planes were not traveling at "full speed" when they struck the towers, so the argument is moot.
It was imploded look at building 7 u will see on corner boom boom boom then the whole building came down. The towers were designed to with stand a plane flying into them.
There weren’t made for a Boeing 737 they were made for smaller planes like cessnas and maybe private jets
@@Roof_Korean.not true
@@ili9975 yes true they are ment to survive small planes they are not made to survive commercial airliners like building have before survived smaller planes but none have survived bigger planes 😂 you don’t have zero facts to back you up
What is the purpose of this conspiracy theory?
The US government flew commercial planes into civilian buildings, killed 3,000+ people, just to invade Iraq, when the US military invades all the time with no justification?
Y’all make up conspiracies just to feel “smarter” when actually it does the opposite. You give way too much credit to those in charge to pull off these “conspiracies.”
You won’t catch me giving that much credit to our dumbass politicians.
@@Roof_Korean.damn bro you love the government that much that you’re willing to back them up for killing thousands over the theft of trillions of dollars? Insane
The wallet survived the fire
Lots of shit survives fire
At the base of the construction, Johnny 5 held vigil with a sign that said, "NO DISASSEMBLE!"
Johnny 5 was eventually sent to Afghanistan, where he is said to have started a brick factory.
The wile coyote took it out .
Finally somebody who gets it! Wiley Coyote also killed Epstein and did pearl harbor
And somehow two tiny planes brought them down......no way with an exoskeleton like that
Tiny !
They were not tiny planes, wow.
If only they used steel that wouldn't melt from a jet fuel fire
Read the reports Dummy, NOT A SINGLE PERSON said the steel melted. DERRRRRRRR
nothing melted, the fires weakened the remaining structure to the point where the metal was able to bend and snap under the weight of the floors above
Le world trade center toujours dans nos cœurs!!!!
“The kangaroo crane” is the most Australian thing I have ever seen today
Its took so many years to build but only 7 hours to broke
What a sad time it was when the towers came down!
Two floors a week 🤯 is what I call damn good communication understanding and team work. They ate and worked on their lunch break like them men who were sitting on that beam hundreds of feet in the air
R.i.p to the people and the legendary buildings. I miss seeing them in the skyline.
The University of Anchorage Alaska's professor of engineering recently covered in the 9/11 building 7 mystery. The trade centers were built to withstand direct hits from planes.
yes......a plane traveling normally that would do it on accident because of thick fog.......not a hijacked airplane on a clear day that was doing 300+
Jet fuel can’t melt steel beams.
To speak as if you actually know something. You do understand that steel can become soft well within speck of jet fuel and an office fire. Not to mention the building was already physically damaged from the impact. Which severed most of the supports. So fire softening compromised steel can and did do the building in.
@@johne540 admit that you are one of the most uneducated commentators here! You have no clue what you’re talking about. You really need to do better than the GED you attained…mind boggling how you can form an opinion based on no actual knowledge of any of the facts
good thing it didn't then.....the beams didn't melt, any beam that survived the impact was heated up enough from the fires to the point where they were able to bend and snap under the weight of the floors above
My gramma didn’t go to work that fateful day😅
In the years following 2001, there was a wave of info that came out, especially on video platforms which were fairly new (like youtube, for example). I think my favorite was Zeitgeist. It is an absolute trove of information on 9/11. There is zero question that these towers did in fact NOT come down as a result of a plane crash and burning jet fuel.
And they (built to withstand an impact from a passenger jetliner) came tumbling down in a matter of minutes. I CALL B.S.
Hours
And yes they can survive the impact, but since it was a long flight scheduled there was a lot of jet fuel.
How does a building collapse from an airplane with all that iron metal welded on and how strong the structure was????? 🤔
China construction companies: hold my beer….
I rate this video 9 out of 11
And our country demolished them 😮
No