Dynamics IITM 5.7 Understanding Coriolis Acceleration

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 42

  • @SlimBertus
    @SlimBertus 15 років тому +12

    That was great, i am a physics student in the netherlands and i missed the lecture on this. The book is horrible at explaining coriolis acceleration.
    The last smal example of the resturant and the force pushing the person sideways hit every thing home as to what coriolis accel is.
    Thank you

  • @QKuKier
    @QKuKier 10 років тому +24

    this is the best quality 240p Ive ever seen

  • @iitmssiva
    @iitmssiva 15 років тому +4

    Dear aaaaaras:
    Thanks for your comment. I will do so by adding a few practical examples.
    anbudban,
    Siva

  • @allopez13
    @allopez13 12 років тому +3

    thank you, i will come again my indian friend.

  • @lifematch
    @lifematch 14 років тому

    @aaaaaras that's why the tittle is understanding corriolis acceleration. I've been doing these kind of question alot but never understood the meaning of it until now. now i can tacle any kind of question using common sense. btw i am computer system engineering in canada. :D

  • @Ankitgoldy2
    @Ankitgoldy2 12 років тому

    really helped a lot thanks... good work

  • @calCR09
    @calCR09 13 років тому

    Excellent!, thanks a lot! It helped me a lot

  • @physicslover3043
    @physicslover3043 8 місяців тому

    Thanks ❤

  • @ajaybhandari7499
    @ajaybhandari7499 5 років тому +1

    excellent

  • @princeshaji4636
    @princeshaji4636 6 років тому

    Sir. Suppose I am moving along the equator and I am shooting at a target moving along North pole, will the bullet do strike the target( with reference to coriolis effect).

  • @meghasingh9294
    @meghasingh9294 12 років тому +2

    i m in iit delhi...i never pay attention to what s n singh teaches in applied mechanics class... n here i m looking for tutorials on youtube :P ..... s n singh watch this video and learn something

  • @brijeshmehra8182
    @brijeshmehra8182 6 років тому +1

    Is not the coriolis acceleration = 2 v cross omega????

  • @AvikMahata
    @AvikMahata 13 років тому

    Excellent..

  • @nikan4now
    @nikan4now 13 років тому +1

    thanks for the video...but you said "a reletative" is in the direction of "r" ...this is not true..it can have any direction

  • @yugeshmetta748
    @yugeshmetta748 5 років тому

    How the acceleration direction is along the centre in man and Earth problem? It should be away from Earth right??

    • @vikasbhat5926
      @vikasbhat5926 4 роки тому

      If it will be away then how can the person will move.he will fly out

    • @yugeshmetta748
      @yugeshmetta748 4 роки тому

      @@vikasbhat5926 what about Earth's gravitational force?
      Suppose there some water on tennis ball.when u rotate the ball what happens? Water will stuck on to the ball or it water will come out?

    • @vikasbhat5926
      @vikasbhat5926 4 роки тому +1

      To move in a circular path i.e equator here...the person have to move with uniform circular motion .now as the motion is uniform circular,it's velocity magnitude should not increase.therefore the force necessary to accelerate will act either towards the centre or away from centre ... If force act away then the body will not maintain a circular motion and fall of the path ..therefore the force i.e centripetal acceleration or radial acceleration will act towards the centre.....just think of a person moving with a car in a circular path...now think of the same as consider firstly

  • @SenseAE
    @SenseAE 4 роки тому

    At 12 minuites do you mean integrate by parts ? I thought you couldnt differentiate by parts

  • @MyOwnstyles
    @MyOwnstyles 6 років тому

    What is meant by r dot or r double dot

    • @Scaletheuniverse
      @Scaletheuniverse 5 років тому +1

      Means derivative of 'r' with respect to 't'.

    • @MyOwnstyles
      @MyOwnstyles 5 років тому

      @@Scaletheuniverse thank u

  • @sriharshaananthoju8671
    @sriharshaananthoju8671 8 років тому

    what is omega there i mean whose angular velocity

    • @ghanshamchandel1854
      @ghanshamchandel1854 6 років тому +1

      He messed up a bit at that part... Omg is ang vel of frame of non inertial frame of reference. i.e solid body in this case.

    • @AjithKumar-ym7bi
      @AjithKumar-ym7bi 4 роки тому

      How comes omega cross v rel

  • @johnnycarrion4754
    @johnnycarrion4754 2 роки тому

    Thereisnt any acceleration in coriolis .

  • @AjithKumar-ym7bi
    @AjithKumar-ym7bi 4 роки тому

    19:17 can anyone explain

  • @tinasheroy
    @tinasheroy 11 років тому

    its the chalk!

  • @조영우-l9r
    @조영우-l9r 7 років тому

    지려따

  • @lifematch
    @lifematch 14 років тому

    @lifematch i mean student. lol not an engineer yet. :p

  • @mridulsinghal5661
    @mridulsinghal5661 3 роки тому

    This professor’s way of deriving the equation is wrong, he replaces d(|r|)/dt with |d(r)/dt| which is totally wrong. It is better to define r vector in terms of basis vector of rotating frame and considering derivatives of this basis with respect to stationary frame.

  • @rajusman
    @rajusman 13 років тому

    fix-ed frame lol. But great prof!

  • @NerdyBeautyX0X0
    @NerdyBeautyX0X0 12 років тому

    other than that good explanation lol

  • @ABHISHEKSHARMA-gj6xp
    @ABHISHEKSHARMA-gj6xp 6 років тому

    saala ye burai jo kar rahe hain saalo ko samajh hi nhi aaya hogva sir ki baattein

  • @Gigione1975
    @Gigione1975 12 років тому

    o ? .. ok ? ,, ok ? lol

  • @NerdyBeautyX0X0
    @NerdyBeautyX0X0 12 років тому

    eewww long yellow nails