@@R.J.1 yes...that was the joke. Impossible to build a rollercoaster while people are riding it and equally impossible to follow the "logic" of a college student.
These privileged college students who have had zero life experience and still live off of their parents (and probably will until they die) sure display such high levels of arrogance for knowing absolutely nothing about the real world.
@@MarshalWalk3r you don’t ever actually argue points, you insult people, and you say blanket statements. Because that’s all you, and the pro-baby-murder side have.
Come on now, got to respect young people who engage with the process of growth. When a person has been lied to their whole life by a culture death it takes time to find one’s way out.
@@EmmaxoOCE I didn't say anything. Yes, I should've put quotations around it to block your childish retort, but that probably wouldn't make any difference in your mind.
Her smug Reddit echo chamber worldview was totally shattered in 15 minutes and that’s why she had to run away the moment she realized that Russell is not what she thought antiabortion activists will be like.
On the contrary, he was quite attentive & interactive. Evidently, you have "disagreed with"/"debated"with "ignored". Infact, as another commenter pointed out: He solicited her attn in order to be interactive with her.
@@JaneFleesTexas All his arguments were wrong if you're delusional. And if someone is delusional they could swear on their life that they're right when in actuality they couldn't be more wrong. That's the crazy thing about delusion.
@@JaneFleesTexas Your comment has the air of a smug immature college student. It's wrong because YOU say so? Tell us how he is wrong, please do enlighten us, we are all waiting.
I didn't think this comment was worthy of a reply. Being "wrong" about art is an even dumber idea than pregnant slaves. It means you don't understand what art is. You lack the capacity.
@@thebigragu9952They’re just deleting comments that disagree with them. But please tell me how “the body inside your body” is AUTONOMOUS?!? lol You can remove that embryo/early fetus at 13 weeks or less, when the majority of elective abortions occur. See how well that goes. 🙄
I love the tax payer comment. She hadn’t really thought through the ownership aspect of “her” public university. I feel bad for her that she is so willing to try and suppress another citizen’s free speech because she doesn’t agree with their perspective. She is complicit in the erosion of her own constitutional rights. Her faux superiority belies her own insecurities about having an alternative perspective represented on campus. If she really thought that the abolitionists message was meritless and couldn’t/shouldn’t be taken seriously, then she why would she care if they were on campus?
I used to be like her. Running off when she realized that she was going to have a harder time debating abortion when she faced the parallel to abolishing slavery is exactly what I would have done when I was pro life. Facing logic, and reasoning when coming from such an emotional and brainwashed standpoint was scary and I would get flustered and opt out just like she did. But here I am now, having totally broken free of the brainwashing after 50 years. I hope she can get here faster than I did.
@@MarshalWalk3rOne of the greatest miracles was the Exodus, where God delivered the Israelites from slavery, so you clearly didn't read any scripture to back up your argument buddy, nice joke though 😂
Jesus taught, “When you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men … but when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your father who is unseen.”
@@MarshalWalk3rDude, just stop, you have no idea what you're talking about. Not only that, but you have no actual arguments, you just run around calling people names like an angry toddler.
@@rainman8534 Women don't need your permission to stop a pregnancy. Your feelings don't matter. Your comment is ironic considering that this entire channel is one big whining "angry toddler" echo chamber. Look at the comments from people like you. You're trying to be the loudest. Abortion is a fundamental human right and you're not a doctor. You've got nothing but tantrums like your previous one.
A common analogy thrown out by pro-choicers… “So say you’re driving and you run a red light or you miss a stop sign and you cause an accident. Due to that accident a life is at stake. That person that you hit requires a kidney transplant and you are a match. Should you be legally required to give them your kidney? Think about it. Now, parallel situation. Two people have sex and an accident occurs, pregnancy. Because of that accident a life is at risk. The use of an organ is required in order to save, develop, grow, or sustain the life at stake. So how is it different when a kidney is required to save a life or a uterus is required to grow a life?” Pro-life response: This is one of the more “compelling” arguments for abortion. It was also well articulated but I think we get the gist here, right? This is an argument from analogy. For an argument from analogy to work the parallels must be…well…parallel in morally relevant ways. If they aren’t, then the analogy fails and the argument falls apart. Here are 4 morally relevant ways the car accident scenario and pregnancy ARE NOT PARALLEL… First, there’s a morally relevant difference between a car accident and pregnancy. Driving a car is NOT NATURALLY ordered towards the condition of having someone connected to you to live, but…sex is! If you need more details, ask your parents. Second, the car accident scenario involves the UNNATURAL use of body parts, whereas pregnancy involves the NATURAL use of body parts. The kidney inside your body is designed to be used for YOUR body. It doesn’t naturally belong in someone else’s body. However, a woman’s uterus is the NATURAL organ to gestate ANOTHER human being. That’s literally it’s job. Third, the analogy EQUATES the relationship between strangers with the relationship between mother and child. Do we really believe a mother has NO MORE responsibility for the welfare of her child than she has towards a total stranger? Finally, there’s a morally relevant difference between REFUSING to help and INTENTIONALLY killing. In the car accident scenario there are three options, help, not help, or kill. But in the case of pregnancy there’s just two options, help or kill. Abortion isn’t merely choosing not to help. It’s choosing to directly kill through poisoning or dismemberment. Well, in the car accident scenario you are not obligated to help, ALTHOUGH, it might be nice. In the case of pregnancy, YOU ARE OBLIGATED NOT TO KILL.
@@williamshepard81There’s no “baby” unless a woman carries a pregnancy to term. Pregnancy is not health neutral and is becoming more dangerous in states with bans. But sure, use ad hominems like “baby killer” to display your ignorance of the topic.
@@MarshalWalk3rthat mindset is the ultimate "blind faith". Just simply admit your subjective and material lifestyle choices justifies your "scientism" ideology.
@@MarshalWalk3r sounds like you lmao. Russel never argues in bad faith, that’s all you do. Who does Russel insult? Because you love dishing em’ out. Projecting much?
It must be so frustrating to try to have an actual intelligent conversation with someone who is a motor mouth and snobby know-it-all who barely has any wisdom. I applaud your patience.
I still wish that one of the questions asked was, "do you know what abortion actually consists of?" I swear that half of these people think a magic wand is waved, and the baby dissappears. Any way it is done is horrific.
You are right ...I have heard so many remarks from people that no almost nothing about human development in the womb, or the horrible reality of the violence that takes place in abortion, but they are absolutely sure that abortion is good thing.
@@Sher7061 yeah well most people don't know/don't care because when the signs are up that show the horror photos of dismemb3red babies, their response is often "omg😡how could you show that?! There are children here!" As if that's not a child they're looking at. Very sad, very disheartening
I would love to know the statistics of how many pro abortion people actually work or volunteer at Pregnancy Crisis Centers. How many work at reforming the foster care system? They always make this attack that anti abortion people do not care about born children. Do any of them care ?
The comedic video editing has not been lost on me at all. Shoutout the editor, obviously very important and very serious topic but some of these videos have me cracking up
She needs to ponder this fact - No one can have 2 separate blood types. A child in the womb in most cases has a different blood type than the mother, and could potentially die in the womb should something cause the two blood types to mix. The child therefore has its own body, as the mother has her own body with their OWN blood types of important value. So the argument, "My body, my choice", is a moot point, because another person is involved who is unable to choose!
"You have to go sign in and let people know that you're here on a *public* campus. You can't just be out here on a *public campus* and not let anyone know"
@@MarshalWalk3r My point is that usually when somebody like this uses the word technically, it's about to be followed up with an opinion or statements that are factually incorrect. Whatever follows the word technically should be objectively true. I'm sure you understood that... Don't worry, Skippy. You'll get there.
Whoa. Arrogance on overload. I can't believe these college students are so immature. They should have worked through this stage years ago back in high school.
The ‘bodily autonomy’ argument that she (and others) tried to argue - they really are arguing for ‘bodily inviolability’, which doesn’t exist, never has existed, and isn’t based in reality. Bodily autonomy does exist, however. The body (the human) inside another body (the mother, or owner of the womb) both have body autonomy. The mother cannot, however, abuse and harm the other body, even to the point of death, without infringing on the other body’s (the baby inside the womb) human rights. Their argument is that you (the government via law) cannot force the mother to care for the human inside her body, via her body, anymore that you can force someone to give a kidney for another to live. The difference is, the mother has to take malicious action to physically abuse, harm, or cause the death of the other body in her body.
@@MarshalWalk3r actually, I have. The last sentence is key. The body in her body is not her body, and thus cannot be harmed without violating the autonomy of that body in her body. If the mother would honor the autonomy of that body, no violation of either would occur. The child isn’t parasitic… You believe in bodily inviolability, which treats the body in the body as a parasite. As I assume you would consider sperm… but when the mother chooses to accept the possibility of sperm into her body, she forfeits her bodily ‘autonomy’ (which, it isn’t… it’s bodily ‘inviolability’, using your use and intent of the word…) 🙄
I know from previous experience at OSU there's an office in the Student Union where you can call & register if you have a TABLE or something that's stationary. You also can just tell them you're coming, if you want to, and don't have a table or probably solicit materials. Obviously you know what you're doing is fine and good 👍
Russ you might as well have posted a video of you talking to a brick wall 😂 I was waiting for her to make a good argument throughout the entire video, sadly didn’t hear one
Then how come they're not separate? The Constitution disagrees with you. So do international human rights. So does medical science. So does history and the law.
8:13 - Listen to this UNBELIEVABLE logic. They will LITERALLY argue anything, no matter how obviously disgusting and immoral it may be. What really sucks about a lot of this - and what is rarely brought up - is that these interviews will now live forever. No matter if she changes her opinion or not, she will forever be accountable for these bizarre opinions to a certain degree. I only raise the issue because this particular young woman exhibits a very disingenuous attitude towards her OWN talking points, which is a clear indication that her opinion is still being molded in her own mind. I would gamble that this specific person will not have the same beliefs she currently has in 10 years, but we always known how ignorant she once was, which is incredibly embarrassing.
Young women are overwhelmingly leftists. They need someone to be an authority over them. That used to be a husband, now it’s the education system, social media, and corporations. Few realize it until it’s too late.
Lord i pray for my generation and the generations that follow! Lord deliver these college kids from demonic theologies and the indoctrination of the system
The thing that makes you so effective is that you remain calm and on point no matter how stupid or obnoxious the people you're talking to are. I couldn't do that.
Her subtle petulance - sarcastic “oohs!” and “wows!” and mock surprise - must be a welcome change from the unhinged, obnoxious rants Russel usually attracts.
The "car crash" analogy is such a terrible analogy. I'm always a little surprised that people bring it up to defend abortion, and I'm always left wondering if they've even thought through their own analogy. The car crash analogy does not work because, at best, it establishes that a mother who has an abortion should be charged with manslaughter. The argument goes that even if you hit someone with your car, you cannot be compelled to donate your blood to save them, and that you have a choice to withhold that life-saving support. So to just play that out a little more, if I hit someone with a car and kill them, I get charged with manslaughter if I knew, or reasonably should have known that my actions would end the life of another person. So if I hit someone with my car, and withhold lifesaving support, and that person dies, I get charged with manslaughter. I have the "option" to withhold support, yes, but if I do that, I'm facing being charged with a crime if the person dies. So to apply this same analog to abortion: the woman has the "option" to withhold support, yes, but if she does, she gets charged with a crime because she knew, or should have known, that her actions would result in the death of another person. This analogy not only doesn't help the pro-choice position, it actually cuts against their argument, by establishing that the woman, acording to the parameters of the analogy, should at the very least be charged with manslaughter.
This girl is chronically online. Responds with words and phrases like "Real" and "That's crazy." TikTok language. It's cringe, but that isn't even why it's so bad. Her being chronically online explains her moral view. She probably found her safe community on Twitter that tries to argue leftwing talking points, then she happened to stumble upon a contradicting view on campus. She was clearly just trying to get a rise out of you to later tweet about "tHiS cRinGe prO-liFeR" she ran into that day.
She must be an Olympic level mental gymnast with how many word salads and flawed hypothetical logic she is using. Someone get here a gold medal for that mental gymnastic
Matthew 6:5 in the Bible says, “And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full”. In this verse, Jesus criticizes those who pray loudly to be seen and praised by others. He calls these people hypocrites. He also says that good deeds are only righteous when done out of devotion to God, rather than for other people's approval.
@Abortion3000 Psalm 139:13 For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother’s womb. Matthew 25:40 “The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’ You’re not a Christian, are you?
Hey there are parts of this video and a few others when I need to turn up my video as much as it will go in order to hear it whether on my phone or tv. Love this channel and all of the videos!!!
Trying to follow her "logic" is like being in a roller coaster while it is being constructed.
Never.
Rollercoasters are actually thought out with physics and reality.
Because it’s based on what makes her feel hurts her daddy the most. Because he’s evil based on his color and sex (gender is made up.)
@@R.J.1 yes...that was the joke. Impossible to build a rollercoaster while people are riding it and equally impossible to follow the "logic" of a college student.
@@sooperd00p Sorry. Missed it. Thanks
Well said.
These privileged college students who have had zero life experience and still live off of their parents (and probably will until they die) sure display such high levels of arrogance for knowing absolutely nothing about the real world.
You're displaying high levels of arrogance right this moment.
@@MarshalWalk3r you don’t ever actually argue points, you insult people, and you say blanket statements. Because that’s all you, and the pro-baby-murder side have.
@@MarshalWalk3r says the guy that never actually debates anyone, and just espouses insults and pro-murder talking points.
Come on now, got to respect young people who engage with the process of growth.
When a person has been lied to their whole life by a culture death it takes time to find one’s way out.
@@exiledhebrew1994huh, also abortions isn’t illegal sadly
She's flippant because she's clever enough to know shes wrong but not clever enough to argue her point.
It’s just funny because both sides are equally smug
@@MrFrinZyno. Russell is arguing with facts, not making things up as he goes along, as the smug girl does.
@@josephfarrugia2350
You can smugly argue with facts
Watching someone who thinks their incredibly witty and intelligent but in actual reality is quite the opposite is cringe AF
welcome to liberal democracy
Truth. You could tell she was cringe before she even opened her mouth
You mean Russell? Yeah, he is cringe worthy, thats for sure
It's so hard to watch
@@damianwhite504no he didn’t mean that & you knew that
the smug reddit personality looks especially bad on women, very cringe
Saying "cringe" is cringe. Your sound kinda like you need a safe space.
@@MarshalWalk3ryou said cringe
@@EmmaxoOCE I didn't say anything. Yes, I should've put quotations around it to block your childish retort, but that probably wouldn't make any difference in your mind.
@@MarshalWalk3r sir, please calm down. You used cringe as an adjective, not just to quote someone else.
@@MarshalWalk3r Yikes, got immediately owned lmao, might wanna delete to avoid further embarrassment buddy.
Her smug Reddit echo chamber worldview was totally shattered in 15 minutes and that’s why she had to run away the moment she realized that Russell is not what she thought antiabortion activists will be like.
She was DTF.
She gave an enthusiastic hey to someone who completely ignored her.
They went up and got her attention.
Suuuurrre..
On the contrary, he was quite attentive & interactive. Evidently, you have "disagreed with"/"debated"with "ignored".
Infact, as another commenter pointed out: He solicited her attn in order to be interactive with her.
@@Anabee3 he means the person who went up and said hey to her. Not Russell.
@@dextersynesterformerlysorb5334 OHWAH! ...I see.
THANK YOU dextersynester! 🤗
Usually when they are losing the debate they resort to “I don’t have time, I got to go” and leave 🤷🏻♂️
I agree, you do have to give her credit for that.
Or "I have to get to class".
All of his arguments were wrong, but ok…
@@JaneFleesTexas All his arguments were wrong if you're delusional. And if someone is delusional they could swear on their life that they're right when in actuality they couldn't be more wrong. That's the crazy thing about delusion.
@@JaneFleesTexas Your comment has the air of a smug immature college student. It's wrong because YOU say so? Tell us how he is wrong, please do enlighten us, we are all waiting.
Prove her wrong regarding art, and then she moved the goalpost to your location and right to be there... her snark-factor goes to 11. 😂
It happened fast too. Didn't it. 🤣These people
Notice that the RusselisEvil guy won’t reply to this comment, because they know their evidence is as inconsistent as the girl in this video.
I didn't think this comment was worthy of a reply.
Being "wrong" about art is an even dumber idea than pregnant slaves.
It means you don't understand what art is. You lack the capacity.
@@thebigragu9952They’re just deleting comments that disagree with them. But please tell me how “the body inside your body” is AUTONOMOUS?!? lol
You can remove that embryo/early fetus at 13 weeks or less, when the majority of elective abortions occur. See how well that goes. 🙄
I love the tax payer comment. She hadn’t really thought through the ownership aspect of “her” public university. I feel bad for her that she is so willing to try and suppress another citizen’s free speech because she doesn’t agree with their perspective. She is complicit in the erosion of her own constitutional rights. Her faux superiority belies her own insecurities about having an alternative perspective represented on campus. If she really thought that the abolitionists message was meritless and couldn’t/shouldn’t be taken seriously, then she why would she care if they were on campus?
She believes in free speech but you must ask permission first and there are assigned free speech areas.
She's not even good at being snarky.
I used to be like her. Running off when she realized that she was going to have a harder time debating abortion when she faced the parallel to abolishing slavery is exactly what I would have done when I was pro life. Facing logic, and reasoning when coming from such an emotional and brainwashed standpoint was scary and I would get flustered and opt out just like she did. But here I am now, having totally broken free of the brainwashing after 50 years. I hope she can get here faster than I did.
Abortion Abolitionists are pro slavery. Fact.
Your honesty is admirable
@@mikethetraveler Still brainwashed though
@RussellIsEvil Yes, you are brainwashed. Not murdering your child isn't slavery.
@@MarshalWalk3rWhat is the proof that the person is brainwashed?
The tongue of the wise uses knowledge rightly,
But the mouth of fools pours forth foolishness.
God created the universe so he could wait billions of years for us to evolve so he could tell slavers they're good people
@@MarshalWalk3r look at you excelling at proving this commenter accurate. Well done! Keep at it, tiger. 👍
@@nunyabusiness2945 You just played yourself.
@@MarshalWalk3rOne of the greatest miracles was the Exodus, where God delivered the Israelites from slavery, so you clearly didn't read any scripture to back up your argument buddy, nice joke though 😂
Let’s gooo, long form contentttt, thank you Abolitionists Rising. Love to see it and God bless the work you do!
God bless your patience Hunter. The smugness was thick with this one. Thank you for your boldness. Pray for you and Abolitionist Rising daily.
Jesus taught, “When you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men … but when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your father who is unseen.”
@@MarshalWalk3rDude, just stop, you have no idea what you're talking about. Not only that, but you have no actual arguments, you just run around calling people names like an angry toddler.
@@rainman8534 Women don't need your permission to stop a pregnancy. Your feelings don't matter.
Your comment is ironic considering that this entire channel is one big whining "angry toddler" echo chamber. Look at the comments from people like you.
You're trying to be the loudest.
Abortion is a fundamental human right and you're not a doctor.
You've got nothing but tantrums like your previous one.
@@MarshalWalk3r he’s not playing. Don’t be hypocritical bigot he is spreading the word..
@@josephfarrugia2350 is the word SLAVERY?
A common analogy thrown out by pro-choicers…
“So say you’re driving and you run a red light or you miss a stop sign and you cause an accident. Due to that accident a life is at stake. That person that you hit requires a kidney transplant and you are a match. Should you be legally required to give them your kidney? Think about it.
Now, parallel situation. Two people have sex and an accident occurs, pregnancy. Because of that accident a life is at risk. The use of an organ is required in order to save, develop, grow, or sustain the life at stake. So how is it different when a kidney is required to save a life or a uterus is required to grow a life?”
Pro-life response:
This is one of the more “compelling” arguments for abortion. It was also well articulated but I think we get the gist here, right? This is an argument from analogy. For an argument from analogy to work the parallels must be…well…parallel in morally relevant ways. If they aren’t, then the analogy fails and the argument falls apart.
Here are 4 morally relevant ways the car accident scenario and pregnancy ARE NOT PARALLEL…
First, there’s a morally relevant difference between a car accident and pregnancy. Driving a car is NOT NATURALLY ordered towards the condition of having someone connected to you to live, but…sex is! If you need more details, ask your parents.
Second, the car accident scenario involves the UNNATURAL use of body parts, whereas pregnancy involves the NATURAL use of body parts. The kidney inside your body is designed to be used for YOUR body. It doesn’t naturally belong in someone else’s body. However, a woman’s uterus is the NATURAL organ to gestate ANOTHER human being. That’s literally it’s job.
Third, the analogy EQUATES the relationship between strangers with the relationship between mother and child. Do we really believe a mother has NO MORE responsibility for the welfare of her child than she has towards a total stranger?
Finally, there’s a morally relevant difference between REFUSING to help and INTENTIONALLY killing. In the car accident scenario there are three options, help, not help, or kill. But in the case of pregnancy there’s just two options, help or kill. Abortion isn’t merely choosing not to help. It’s choosing to directly kill through poisoning or dismemberment.
Well, in the car accident scenario you are not obligated to help, ALTHOUGH, it might be nice. In the case of pregnancy, YOU ARE OBLIGATED NOT TO KILL.
Perfect 🤌🏿🤌🏿🤌🏿
Nice opinion, but we don't answer to you.
Your scenario is dumb and pointless. You think it's all about you.
@@MarshalWalk3r "we dont answer to you" I found the collectivist
@@joem2457You spelled "cultist" wrong.
@@MarshalWalk3rit's not their scenario though. It's one proposed by your group, allegedly. So, thanks for agreeing, I guess.
Theres actually so many holes in the pro choice argument its crazy. They keep going from one example to another whenever they feel cornered
There's no hole. You keep ignoring facts.
@@MarshalWalk3relaborate please, why is a fetus not a baby? Why is it permissible to murder it without regard?
@@MarshalWalk3r the irony of your statement... 🤦♂️
@@thebigragu9952a fetus is not a baby because it hasn’t formed into one yet
@@exiledhebrew1994 at what point does the fetus become a baby?
"But you think it should be illegal to molest 6 year olds."
"No no no no, you're putting words in my mouth."
She didn't think that one through
He was.
@@MarshalWalk3r so you don't think it should be illegal to molest 6 year olds?
I had to do a double take on that one. I can’t believe this is the future generation…
@@Blablabla44475 I can't believe you exist.
Oh my goodness 3 videos in one week from my favorite group!?!? God bless us all. Did you guys hire a video person or something? This is so great!!!
her smug pre-programming only lasted about 7 minutes in, then she started the verbal flak.
Deflection is her only argument?
Nah but it's all Russell will show
@@MarshalWalk3rlmao, imagine be so butthurt, and so in favor or murdering babies, you make a hate account dedicated to a person. Actually pathetic
@@MarshalWalk3r Seethe, liar.
@@MarshalWalk3rlmao, did Russel hurt your feelings? Can you not murder babies anymore? Oh no! Im so sorry!
@@MarshalWalk3r shut up Jeff.
Abolish abortion now!
Na.
@HawksDiesel How about pregnancy prevention instead?
@@jonahzablow2132how about both
@@HawksDiesel..found the baby killer party member.
@@williamshepard81There’s no “baby” unless a woman carries a pregnancy to term. Pregnancy is not health neutral and is becoming more dangerous in states with bans. But sure, use ad hominems like “baby killer” to display your ignorance of the topic.
Clearly, she's a student of the law. The arrogance of ignorance.
The arrogance of ignorance is one thing Russell excels at sharing.
@@MarshalWalk3rcope harder, chomo.
In 1850…slave ownership was a “divisive topic”
Not your plantation. Mind your business
10:54 watch the mental gymnastics in real time
When you don't teach laws of logic and only teach worldview the result is humans that can't discern good from bad worldview.
Says the slavery advocate
why are you going all the way back to 1850 to make that comparison, tho? Why not another, far more current issue? Hm...
Her thoughts are irrational, no matter how hard she tries.
But let me guess, you think there's a sky daddy.
@@MarshalWalk3r you believe everything came from nothing. Rational.
@@MarshalWalk3rthat mindset is the ultimate "blind faith". Just simply admit your subjective and material lifestyle choices justifies your "scientism" ideology.
@@MarshalWalk3r Christians don't believe in a "Sky Daddy". Christians believe in the God of the Bible. You can use a better red herring than that.
@@MarshalWalk3r...you'll change your tune on judgment day. Also I see that you changed your youtube name troll.
“My snarky attitude and faulty logic aren’t working, time to run away!”
C ya
@@MarshalWalk3rOoh look more of that intellect.
Poor little girl. You can literally see her realizing everything she thought she knew was WRONG. 🤣
Nah, but it's amazing what the blind think they see.
@@MarshalWalk3r You are correct. I don't think she changed her mind on anything. She was incredibly smug and annoying.
I don't think we watched the same video, this girl has no clue and hasn't listened to a word Russel says
@@MarshalWalk3rare u said girl in the video? I see you feverishly responding to several comments here 😂
@@robynlmt24lol yeas, he's obsessed 😂😂😂
I hope that one day I can master the level of sarcasm that Russell uses. It's pretty legendary.
His delivery is EVERYTHING 🤣👍🏼
It truly is. Makes us laugh😂
Disingenuous and sarcastic insults - sounds just like Jesus.
@RussellIsEvil
Book and verse please.
@@MarshalWalk3r sounds like you lmao. Russel never argues in bad faith, that’s all you do. Who does Russel insult? Because you love dishing em’ out. Projecting much?
That “logic” from her was something else…. But I’m thankful for Russell’s patience and humility in light of facing this kind arrogance.
She starts with insults then moves to claiming he is not allowed to be there. The open minds of our youth have become extinct.
Wrong, in fact their minds are so open that it fell out their sku11s😵💫
Fetusphobes and science deniers that the baby is a human. Keep up the good work. Grateful of your message.
It's not a baby. Look at you making up your own SJW language. Cute.
@@MarshalWalk3rso, it’s a fetus? Go open Google Translate, pick Latin, type in “fetus”, and be amazed.
@@MarshalWalk3r Say What? Of course a child in the womb is a baby. You can use different terms, but it all adds up to a baby.
It must be so frustrating to try to have an actual intelligent conversation with someone who is a motor mouth and snobby know-it-all who barely has any wisdom.
I applaud your patience.
Maybe peddling on the street just isn't effective.
@@MarshalWalk3rhahahahahaa. Someone’s butthurt.
It's amazing how much you people lie @@thebigragu9952
I think they would actually prefer this type of conversation then a person screaming profanities and ripping up fliers.
@@amandar.9872 I mean… both of those strategies are obnoxious. Doesn’t make commenters opinion any less valid. 🤔
Pretty sure you can be tried for murder if you drunkenly kill someone with your car
Manslaughter to some degree. Murder requires intent.
Does she go to art fairs and ask artists why their art is drawn "weird?"
I still wish that one of the questions asked was, "do you know what abortion actually consists of?"
I swear that half of these people think a magic wand is waved, and the baby dissappears.
Any way it is done is horrific.
You are right ...I have heard so many remarks from people that no almost nothing about human development in the womb, or the horrible reality of the violence that takes place in abortion, but they are absolutely sure that abortion is good thing.
@@Sher7061 yeah well most people don't know/don't care because when the signs are up that show the horror photos of dismemb3red babies, their response is often "omg😡how could you show that?! There are children here!" As if that's not a child they're looking at. Very sad, very disheartening
@@ChildOfYahuahElohim It really is very sad.
"I think it's interesting that.." Insert passive aggressive snark.
Show me on the doll where the snark hurt you
@@MarshalWalk3r Doesn't hurt anyone but herself.
This is so painful to watch the complete lack of critical thinking skills in this generation.
Does she think having a child means a mother has to give her life with her analogy?
You're being awfully generous calling that a debate!
I would love to know the statistics of how many pro abortion people actually work or volunteer at Pregnancy Crisis Centers. How many work at reforming the foster care system? They always make this attack that anti abortion people do not care about born children. Do any of them care ?
That's one way to deflect responsibility.
@@MarshalWalk3r Responsibility of what
@@MarshalWalk3ryes it is how these young people deflect responsibility . They are so arrogant and unable to form logical answers they just deflect
@@lscizmlpoor impulse control
There's over 3,000 centers to help women during and after pregnancy when they chose not to abort
Smugness is so repulsive
She was so annoyed by facts
Abortion is a human right. Fact.
Love how they jump to absurdities when they don’t like the truth.
We wrestle not against the flesh and blood.. i have to remind myself of this alot lately.
You are out there doing the Lords work, I certainly would not have the patience for that stupidity
The comedic video editing has not been lost on me at all. Shoutout the editor, obviously very important and very serious topic but some of these videos have me cracking up
She needs to ponder this fact - No one can have 2 separate blood types. A child in the womb in most cases has a different blood type than the mother, and could potentially die in the womb should something cause the two blood types to mix. The child therefore has its own body, as the mother has her own body with their OWN blood types of important value. So the argument, "My body, my choice", is a moot point, because another person is involved who is unable to choose!
Children don't exist in the womb.
but if you outlaw abortion, you are removing a measure of bodily autonomy. Therefore, it's not a 'moot' point after all.
The long form videos are really awesome
Poor kid can't even hold a coherent conversation.
same as Wussell
@@damianwhite504Same as DumbmianWhite504.
Hopefully one day these children choose to kneel rather than shout. ✝️
Only the slave kneel.
“ you must fill paperwork out to stand there, because this is a PUBLIC campus” lol😂
"You have to go sign in and let people know that you're here on a *public* campus. You can't just be out here on a *public campus* and not let anyone know"
Thanks for everything you all do
When people like this use the word technically, you can rest assured that the next words will be technically incorrect...
I love the irony here
@@MarshalWalk3r My point is that usually when somebody like this uses the word technically, it's about to be followed up with an opinion or statements that are factually incorrect. Whatever follows the word technically should be objectively true. I'm sure you understood that... Don't worry, Skippy. You'll get there.
Whoa. Arrogance on overload. I can't believe these college students are so immature. They should have worked through this stage years ago back in high school.
Wow that was an EPIC REBUTTAL.
You came in clutch when she thought she has you.
The ‘bodily autonomy’ argument that she (and others) tried to argue - they really are arguing for ‘bodily inviolability’, which doesn’t exist, never has existed, and isn’t based in reality.
Bodily autonomy does exist, however. The body (the human) inside another body (the mother, or owner of the womb) both have body autonomy. The mother cannot, however, abuse and harm the other body, even to the point of death, without infringing on the other body’s (the baby inside the womb) human rights.
Their argument is that you (the government via law) cannot force the mother to care for the human inside her body, via her body, anymore that you can force someone to give a kidney for another to live. The difference is, the mother has to take malicious action to physically abuse, harm, or cause the death of the other body in her body.
That's not what bodily autonomy means. Your last sentence showed how little you've thought about this.
@@MarshalWalk3r actually, I have. The last sentence is key. The body in her body is not her body, and thus cannot be harmed without violating the autonomy of that body in her body. If the mother would honor the autonomy of that body, no violation of either would occur. The child isn’t parasitic…
You believe in bodily inviolability, which treats the body in the body as a parasite. As I assume you would consider sperm… but when the mother chooses to accept the possibility of sperm into her body, she forfeits her bodily ‘autonomy’ (which, it isn’t… it’s bodily ‘inviolability’, using your use and intent of the word…) 🙄
Her logic blows my mind, and they are tought this in school, no critical thinking, just drink the Kool aid
*Taught*
@@MarshalWalk3roof, is this all you have?
@@thebigragu9952 yes... yes it is.
Any logic blows your mind.
@@lordswaine5238What an ignorant teen you are
She makes no sense
As an Oklahoma State grad, this was both sad and embarrassing to watch...
I can imagine. 😬
I think Russell is also an Oklahoma state grad as well, imagine how he felt during this lol
Making my evening brother, God bless y’all!
He has the patience of a Saint.
You would too if this were your only way to survive.
@@MarshalWalk3rwhat does that mean?
@@MarshalWalk3rDid this make sense to you when you wrote it down?
This person has 0 logic. Even in her argument, you would go to jail for Vehicular manslaughter.
I know from previous experience at OSU there's an office in the Student Union where you can call & register if you have a TABLE or something that's stationary.
You also can just tell them you're coming, if you want to, and don't have a table or probably solicit materials.
Obviously you know what you're doing is fine and good 👍
Your patience is very inspiring.
Russ you might as well have posted a video of you talking to a brick wall 😂 I was waiting for her to make a good argument throughout the entire video, sadly didn’t hear one
Wow her levels of thinking she knows better are off the chart. Arrogant, entitled, and I’m glad you still engaged with her on her level.
Unborn babies are people. They are separate individuals from their mother.
Then how come they're not separate?
The Constitution disagrees with you. So do international human rights. So does medical science. So does history and the law.
@Abortion3000 "Then how come they're not separate?" By your logic, conjoined twins are not two separate individuals.
I'm thinking her parents sent her to university just to get her away from them. She's not even the smartest person in the room when she's alone.
Calling an abortionist “pro choice” is adopting their framing. Don’t do that.
You don't know what "abortionist" means.
@@MarshalWalk3rEnlighten us.
"When you popped out, FACE!" 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
You are quite literally doing the lords work, thank you Russell!
The patience of Job , and very kind . well done good and faithful servant.
She never seems to miss an opportunity to shift to semantics.
they actually believe they are intelligent. its pathetic.
It is pathetic. They not only think they're intelligent, they think they're so much more progressive and awakened than the rest of us.
8:13 - Listen to this UNBELIEVABLE logic. They will LITERALLY argue anything, no matter how obviously disgusting and immoral it may be. What really sucks about a lot of this - and what is rarely brought up - is that these interviews will now live forever. No matter if she changes her opinion or not, she will forever be accountable for these bizarre opinions to a certain degree. I only raise the issue because this particular young woman exhibits a very disingenuous attitude towards her OWN talking points, which is a clear indication that her opinion is still being molded in her own mind. I would gamble that this specific person will not have the same beliefs she currently has in 10 years, but we always known how ignorant she once was, which is incredibly embarrassing.
"Oh. Well... We don't sign up for spots." 🤣
Good point, their stupidity shall live on forever
The number of times she said “that’s interesting” was very interesting 😆
I find it very interesting that you also noticed that!
This indoctrinated young lady was hard to listen too...her attitude was more than I could bear. You are a very patient dude!
Reality must be painful
@@MarshalWalk3rJust busting at the seams with intellect.
Cringeworthy and horrible arrogance.
Says the arrogant teenage slaver.
Permission to exercise your rights,,, ?? Huh?
Young women are overwhelmingly leftists. They need someone to be an authority over them. That used to be a husband, now it’s the education system, social media, and corporations. Few realize it until it’s too late.
This one was hard to watch
The level of narcissism among modern women, unbelievable. 🙏🏼🇺🇸
If passive agression had a face...
ignorance with confidence is the most embarrassing combination.
Lord i pray for my generation and the generations that follow! Lord deliver these college kids from demonic theologies and the indoctrination of the system
The thing that makes you so effective is that you remain calm and on point no matter how stupid or obnoxious the people you're talking to are. I couldn't do that.
Pure Evil.
Her subtle petulance - sarcastic “oohs!” and “wows!” and mock surprise - must be a welcome change from the unhinged, obnoxious rants Russel usually attracts.
The "car crash" analogy is such a terrible analogy. I'm always a little surprised that people bring it up to defend abortion, and I'm always left wondering if they've even thought through their own analogy. The car crash analogy does not work because, at best, it establishes that a mother who has an abortion should be charged with manslaughter. The argument goes that even if you hit someone with your car, you cannot be compelled to donate your blood to save them, and that you have a choice to withhold that life-saving support.
So to just play that out a little more, if I hit someone with a car and kill them, I get charged with manslaughter if I knew, or reasonably should have known that my actions would end the life of another person. So if I hit someone with my car, and withhold lifesaving support, and that person dies, I get charged with manslaughter. I have the "option" to withhold support, yes, but if I do that, I'm facing being charged with a crime if the person dies. So to apply this same analog to abortion: the woman has the "option" to withhold support, yes, but if she does, she gets charged with a crime because she knew, or should have known, that her actions would result in the death of another person.
This analogy not only doesn't help the pro-choice position, it actually cuts against their argument, by establishing that the woman, acording to the parameters of the analogy, should at the very least be charged with manslaughter.
This girl is chronically online. Responds with words and phrases like "Real" and "That's crazy." TikTok language. It's cringe, but that isn't even why it's so bad. Her being chronically online explains her moral view. She probably found her safe community on Twitter that tries to argue leftwing talking points, then she happened to stumble upon a contradicting view on campus. She was clearly just trying to get a rise out of you to later tweet about "tHiS cRinGe prO-liFeR" she ran into that day.
When they can't win, they run away 😂
When your morals are built on sand, they always shift.
She must be an Olympic level mental gymnast with how many word salads and flawed hypothetical logic she is using. Someone get here a gold medal for that mental gymnastic
*Gymnast* or *gymnastics*
Are any of you literate?
Saving lives by saving babies !
This poor girl thinks she’s a lot smarter than she is. She’s barely listening. Just enough to know when to speak again and sound smart.
How do you know?
This female is trying so hard to defend murder
No woman needs to justify her abortion to anyone.
@Abortion3000 They can’t
@@rocknrolan7371 And you're entitled to your opinion
I can tell you're a guy.
@@MarshalWalk3r how?
I swear, i have notifications on and never get notified when you actually post:(
Church, pray for these people. We were once them
Matthew 6:5 in the Bible says, “And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full”.
In this verse, Jesus criticizes those who pray loudly to be seen and praised by others. He calls these people hypocrites. He also says that good deeds are only righteous when done out of devotion to God, rather than for other people's approval.
@Abortion3000
Psalm 139:13
For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother’s womb.
Matthew 25:40
“The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’
You’re not a Christian, are you?
@@rocknrolan7371 religion is a disease
Hey there are parts of this video and a few others when I need to turn up my video as much as it will go in order to hear it whether on my phone or tv.
Love this channel and all of the videos!!!
I am considering suing your little channel for daring to upload a video shorter than 3 hours long. Please do better next time.
#facts
God bless you, sir, I admire your patience!
Maaan... you go about it in a very cautious yet bold way. "You got me 1:0."
That requires alot of experience and self control. Well done good sir.