How We Become via "God Field" Observation

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 36

  • @nothingnessnonarcissism
    @nothingnessnonarcissism  28 днів тому +3

    If you’re intrigued by The Quantum Divine Nexus: A Journey Unifying Science and Spirituality to Unveil Life’s Purpose, visit the official website at www.quantum-divine-nexus.com. There, you can access also a preview of the book and stay updated on its upcoming release.

    • @Armand_Martin
      @Armand_Martin 28 днів тому +2

      Thank you Sam, it's an honour to have your support for my work!

  • @lindamcintosh9645
    @lindamcintosh9645 Місяць тому +4

    I have to admit that this is over my head on first listening.
    But will re watch, as always with great interest.

  • @loubrielsosalac470
    @loubrielsosalac470 Місяць тому +3

    Thank you... The pieces are finally connecting, your articulation has been a catalyst. Be Well!

  • @_sh1123
    @_sh1123 Місяць тому +2

    Thank you, Professor!

  • @Kim_JSh
    @Kim_JSh Місяць тому +3

    Thankyou. This is so breathtaking, and i am looking foreward to grasp more of it.
    For now i have a few thoughts. For instans: If consciousness in a human being is immortal, where does it go when the physical being is no more?
    Also: We Seem to live in a dualistic world. A fox knows how to be a fox, a human being, well, what is a human being?
    A human being can go beyond the ongoing motion towards equilibrium, that Seem to be the prefered state of our body , most meaningful in order to be healthy.
    By thinking, by acting. By experimenting. And so changing our inherited DNA by activating or inhibiting different parts of it. Epigenetics.
    So an important question for me is emerging:
    Can we as human beings keep a door open to the posibility that perhaps a universal priviledged observer is still interacting with its creation ?
    That we are perhaps far from having been fully incarnated, more like in the making, and that it requires some communication still to see the meaning in this i mean evne for the creator ?
    And if so; That at least a part of this communication is personal because we each percieve things slightly different, and perhaps there is more than a one size fits all?
    If so, we are perhaps best served/ and serving by thinking, that there might be both an individual and a collective language and story for each person.
    I have heard some gurutypes say that how grandiose to think that God cares about the details in your little existance.
    I am thinking that way about what Vaknin have said about the psykotic state, where you disappear and become the world.
    Unlike the narcissist that takes the the world in and want it to act according to his idea about how it should be.
    What if there is somewhere in the middle:
    That our responsibilities are both in individuating, actions and experiences and at the same time part of collective awareness and growth.
    One last thing for now, is the question of consciance, is it from comunity or an inherent inner quality. Vaknin said resently that it might be from something we learnt from the outside and have internalisered.
    Perhaps. But i think it is a very important key question.
    Because if it is a personal inner experience which action to take in a situation, then it can be acute, not seen before, solution created on the spot, perhaps even without thinking so much. But rather listening and just do in a clear moment.
    It could free us easier from outher doktrinens, inner ancestral heavy voices, the substitut creaters, our parents and their gazing us into..an amputated existance.
    Listening could evt be a good habit.
    So if i should start to cooperate with the fact that right now i am a human being in this place and perhaps still in creation, still on a long journey of incarnating human potetial and still know nothing, i could start to ask: what is it to incarnate as a human being?
    If there are no hints of an answer, i will pray to be a fox next time;)
    Anyway, looking foreward to the book, thanks for sharing, kind regards :)

  • @LEONARDO-xs2ke
    @LEONARDO-xs2ke Місяць тому +3

    This is giving Adwait Vedanta. Oneness. All pervading consciousness

  • @kuibeiguahua
    @kuibeiguahua Місяць тому +5

    In the vast history of our world, it is not impossible to imagine that two water molecules have been part of the same wave before.
    And if something is not impossible then it is possible.
    Now can you imagine 108 drops of water forming a wave? 🌊
    It’s a closed system, in an infinite universe, it’s bound to happen!

  • @patriciamcdermott1367
    @patriciamcdermott1367 Місяць тому +5

    Wow. ❤

  • @lindamcintosh9645
    @lindamcintosh9645 Місяць тому +3

    There is undoubtedly a purpose in nature.
    An intention.
    Febunacci saw it

  • @ElenaWraithSevatarion
    @ElenaWraithSevatarion Місяць тому +5

    Dear Professor. Would you speak about feeling constant "background anguish". It's how I call the constant feeling of dread, even if I am functional. Thank you very much. A hug from Argentina

  • @Mountlougallops
    @Mountlougallops Місяць тому +9

    Consciousness does not exist. It is existence itself. ☀

  • @tartantilia
    @tartantilia Місяць тому +4

    Thank you!

    • @mikesmith-z4j
      @mikesmith-z4j Місяць тому +1

      Sorry it's just unprovable word salad to garner narcissistic supply

    • @CoolCoping
      @CoolCoping Місяць тому

      ​@@mikesmith-z4jdo u also suspect that his 'credentials' are somewhat fake ?

    • @CoolCoping
      @CoolCoping Місяць тому

      ​@@mikesmith-z4jwell... i m suspecting u too , "joined on 4th november 2024"

    • @tartantilia
      @tartantilia Місяць тому

      ​​@@mikesmith-z4jI did not expect special attention, I am expressing gratitude. My statement of "Thank you!" is not - word salad. I am very confused by your comment. Word salad, is usually not intentional speech and therefore does not meet the criteria of attention seeking behavior, and is not traditionally recognized in conjunction with cluster b. Word salad - Schizophasia is a form of nonsensical babble, that is usually a result of a delusional episode, brain injuries, as well as an early warning sign of dementia.

  • @kathii-nan5144
    @kathii-nan5144 Місяць тому +4

    Time is not a River but an Ocean. God is not Thinking but Feeling.

    • @OrendaBol
      @OrendaBol Місяць тому

      Time is a river as well as an ocean, all depends on your way of observing it. God thinks and feels, why would God not think?

    • @kathii-nan5144
      @kathii-nan5144 Місяць тому

      @@OrendaBol The question is: Why would God think, if they already know everything? What is the point?

  • @Pojpanevem
    @Pojpanevem Місяць тому

    This was a very interesting video, but it's really hard to get my head around the idea that an inanimate object can have an awareness (is consciouss). It's hard for me to understand how it is possible if it cannot think like a living being or a human more preciselly.
    So it has a consciousness in a sense that it contains a mind of it's maker? It's creators ideas are programmed into the watch for example - are parts of a watch (mechanism, pointers etc.)?
    Is the watch consciousness that that it can show us time and in a case of a smartphone that that it can give us what we want from it - making a call, sending sms?
    When we observe our creation (a smartphone) does it mean we're using it phisically? Is this use a kind of interaction which gives meaning, not only observing it? When i observe a smartphone how is it programmed to become aware and responds? Is it In a sense that it gives me what i need (that i can call someone, giving me the sound for example?
    Also I wonder Is this part similar with a view in a theory of Panpsychism?
    Be Well!

  • @amoore7357
    @amoore7357 Місяць тому +1

    Divine ONEness

  • @enriquemartinez5647
    @enriquemartinez5647 Місяць тому

    Lacan's words in 00:07:30 about what the object of psychoanalysis is at..

  • @tczacko
    @tczacko Місяць тому

    may this theory be help- or meaningful in order to develop and establish better ai systems? maybe we might create our own kind of chronom field within the chronom field we are all part of, which resembles some kind of ai with highly intelligent and creative thinking?

  • @everythingmax
    @everythingmax Місяць тому +1

    Is there a link to the book "the quantum divine nexus"?

  • @Paul-Pixton
    @Paul-Pixton Місяць тому

    I wonder if we are on the same page. My phone is only conscious if it is in the awareness of my consciousness. I would agree with this. Perhaps making it easier if I have a thought, then that thought is the content of my consciousness so there for it is conscious, which I agree. Then, if I am not having that thought . Not only is it not conscious, but it has no existences at all in witch if my phone is not in my thoughts or awareness, then there is no phone. Not only to me but no phone at all and never was. In other words, nothing has any existence at all unless it is in my consciousness. At least, this is how I see it anyway. Ps when I say my consciousness, i mean collective C. 🙏

  • @maryoconnor2596
    @maryoconnor2596 Місяць тому

    That's the first time I've heard of the "cranome field theory " what a fantastic theory. ALso I' dreamed last night of 7 heads or entities Within the human consciousness. Turns out there's is abit wrote about it. "The 7types".

    • @johnnytass2111
      @johnnytass2111 Місяць тому +1

      Chronon Field Theory. Chronos means Time.

  • @johnnytass2111
    @johnnytass2111 Місяць тому +3

    Prof Vaknin, if i may share my perspective on the tension btw events and potentials, classical physics of the observable and quantum mechanics of all potential uncreated futures. The tension btw the past and the future and the point of presence that is Consciousness.
    I know you say Science has no room for metaphysical things such as the Will. But let us examine from a quantum superposition point of view a simple law from the Bible:
    "If anyone even looks lustfully after a woman, he has already committed adultery in his heart."
    If we can imagine measuring this precise moment of Conscious desire (Will) with the superposition of all entangled particles...
    Say, a husband, his wife, and the desired other woman...that very quantum moment of lust in the husbands psyche alters the probable outcome of their uncreated futures.
    And say, the desired woman recoginzes his gaze, and she gazes back (like Nietzsche's abyss), at that very moment all the events of the possible future shared life with his wife collapses into infinte nothingness, and what emerges is the drama about to unfold with the Mistress.
    I like to think at some point in the potential future, science will gain knowledge of this moment and the Conscious Will.
    Thank you for all your lectures on all you touch upon. I'm grateful.

  • @johnnytass2111
    @johnnytass2111 Місяць тому +2

    Bravo Prof Vaknin. The Wu (infinite nothingness) and the Yu (what can be observed) (spelling?) being One you spoke of in a previous video is similar to God the Father (infinite nothingness) and God the Son (the Word/Logos) being One. Afterall, we are all Children of God in this sense. May all of us, and especially the ones in the Holy Land humble ourselves to truly love one another.
    Be blessed on your journey fellow truth seekers.