A Nice Rational Equation Solved with Substitution | Math Olympiad

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 12

  • @woobjun2582
    @woobjun2582 3 місяці тому +8

    By letting
    (2x² +3x -5)/(x +1) =y
    the given becomes
    y² + (y +2)² = 4,
    and then
    y² + y² +4y +4 = 4;
    2y² +4y +4 =4;
    2y² +4y =0;
    y² +2y =0;
    y(y+2) =0,
    that is,
    y =0 or y =-2
    Thus, recalling 'y'
    (2x² +3x -5)/(x +1) =0 (e1)
    or
    (2x² +3x -5)/(x +1) =-2 (e2)
    Solving (e1)
    2x² +3x -5 =0;
    (x -1)(2x +5) =0;
    x = 1, -5/2
    Solving (e2)
    2x² +3x -5 =-2(x +1);
    2x² +5x -3 = 0;
    (x +3)(2x -1) =0;
    x = -3, 1/2
    Over all,
    x = -3, -5/2, 1/2, 1

  • @vacuumcarexpo
    @vacuumcarexpo 3 місяці тому +3

    I solved this as follows:
    Let t=2(x+1)-6/(x+1),
    then the given equation is (t-1)^2+(t+1)^2=4⇔t=±1.
    2(x+1)-6/(x+1)=±1
    ⇔2x^2+3x-5=0 or 2x^2+5x-3=0
    It is intriguing that x's such that either of the numerators is zero are solutions.

  • @RashmiRay-c1y
    @RashmiRay-c1y 3 місяці тому +6

    Note that [2x^2+5x-3]/(x+1) = [2x^2+3x-5]/(x+1 +2. So, let t= [2x^2+3x-5]/(x+1) +1 = [2x^2+4x-4]/(x+1). Then the given equation becomes (t+1)^2 + (t-1)^2 = 4 > t^2=1 > t = +/-1. If t=1, 2x*2+3x-5=0 > x= -5/2, 1. If t=-1, 2x^2+5x-3=0 > x=-3, 1/2. Thus, x=-3, -5/2, 1/2, 1.

  • @潘博宇-k4l
    @潘博宇-k4l 3 місяці тому +3

    X=1, -3, 1/2; -5/2.

  • @Fjfurufjdfjd
    @Fjfurufjdfjd 3 місяці тому +3

    Θετωy=2(x)^2+4x-4. και εχω y/(x+1)=+ -1 αρα x=-5/2, 1, -3, 1/2

  • @Quest3669
    @Quest3669 3 місяці тому +4

    X=1; -5/2; 1/2; -3
    Ironically; both upper terms of l. H. S are the solns.

  • @RealQinnMalloryu4
    @RealQinnMalloryu4 3 місяці тому +1

    {8x^2+9x^2➖} (5)^2)=| 17x^4 ➖ 25}》= 8x^4/2x^2 =4x 2^2x^2 1^1x^2 1x^2 (x ➖ 2x+1) {8x^2+10x^2} (3)^2 ={18x^4 ➖ 9} =9x^4 /2x^2 =4
    1x^2 2^2.1^1x^2^1.1^1x^2^1 x^2^1 (x ➖ 2x+1).

  • @kassuskassus6263
    @kassuskassus6263 3 місяці тому +2

    x=-3, x=-5/2, x=1/2 and x=1

  • @MrGeorge1896
    @MrGeorge1896 3 місяці тому +1

    Multiply both sides by 4 (x + 1)²:
    (4x² + 6x - 10)² + (4x² + 10x - 6)² = 16 (x + 1)²
    (2x + 5)² (2x - 2)² + (2x - 6)² (2x + 1)² = 16 (x + 1)²
    I got stuck here so I just solved the four brackets:
    2x + 5 = 0 -> x = -5/2
    2x - 2 = 0 -> x = 1
    2x - 6 = 0 -> x = 3
    2x + 1 = 0 -> x = -1/2
    and all four solutions work. But I am not quiet sure why? 😅

  • @walterwen2975
    @walterwen2975 2 місяці тому +1

    A Nice Rational Equation Solved with Substitution, Math Olympiad:
    [(2x² + 3x - 5)/(x + 1)]² + [(2x² + 5x - 3)/(x + 1)]² = 4, x ϵR, x ≠ - 1; x = ?
    Let: y = (2x² + 4x - 4)/(x + 1)
    (2x² + 3x - 5)/(x + 1) = y - 1, (2x² + 5x - 3)/(x + 1) = y + 1
    [(2x² + 3x - 5)/(x + 1)]² + [(2x² + 5x - 3)/(x + 1)]² = (y - 1)² + (y + 1)² = 4
    2(y² + 1) = 4, y² + 1 = 2, y² =1; y = ± 1 = (2x² + 4x - 4)/(x + 1)
    (2x² + 4x - 4)/(x + 1) = 1 or (2x² + 4x - 4)/(x + 1) = - 1
    2x² + 4x - 4 = x + 1, 2x² + 3x - 5 = 0, (x - 1)(2x + 5) = 0
    x - 1 = 0; x = 1 or 2x + 5 = 0; x = - 5/2
    2x² + 4x - 4 = - (x + 1), 2x² + 5x - 3 = 0, (x + 3)(2x - 1) = 0
    x + 3 = 0; x = - 3 or 2x - 1 = 0; x = 1/2
    x =1, x = 1/2, x = - 5/2, x = - 3
    Answer check:
    [(2x² + 3x - 5)/(x + 1)]² + [(2x² + 5x - 3)/(x + 1)]² = 4
    x = 1: [(2 + 3 - 5)/(1 + 1)]² + [(2 + 5 - 3)/(1 + 1)]² = 0 + 2² = 4; Confirmed
    x = 1/2: [(1/2 + 3/2 - 5)/(1/2 + 1)]² + [(1/2 + 5/2 - 3)/(1/2 + 1)]²
    = (- 2)² + 0 = 4; Confirmed
    x = - 5/2: [(25/2 - 15/2 - 5)/(- 5/2 + 1)]² + [(25/2 - 25/2 - 3)/(- 5/2 + 1)]²
    = (- 2)² + 0 = 4; Confirmed
    x = - 3: [(18 - 9 - 5)/(- 3 + 1)]² + [(18 - 15 - 3)/(- 3 + 1)]² = 4; Confirmed
    Final answer:
    x = 1, x = 1/2, x = - 5/2 or x = - 3

  • @paulortega5317
    @paulortega5317 3 місяці тому

    [((2x^2+4x-4) - (x+1)) / (x+1)]^2 + [((2x^2+4x-4) + (x+1)) / (x+1)]^2 = 4. Let u = (2x^2+4x-4)/(x+1)]^2. (u/(x+1) - 1)^2 + (u/(x+1)+1)^2=4. Let v = u/(x+1). (v-1)^2 + (v+1)^2 = 4. 2*v^2+2=4. v= +/- 1. Etc.

  • @52soccerstar
    @52soccerstar 3 місяці тому +1

    My method shows I have no talent