Plasma Physics, Inner Alchemy (Neidan), and Consciousness - an auditory take

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 7

  • @OceanFoam
    @OceanFoam 4 місяці тому

    so informative!! so glad i found your content!!

  • @_2ston3d
    @_2ston3d 4 місяці тому

    I thoroughly enjoyed this & could listen for hours if you had a podcast

  • @AnnonymousPrime-ks4uf
    @AnnonymousPrime-ks4uf 14 днів тому +1

    Do research on plasma energy and sentience as well as light and energy.
    The solution to the void of meaning that Kant brought might be the dialectical unity if we find how awarness and consciousness relates with one another. Sentience is merely awarness. Our brains as recent studies shows might be in fact functioning on plasma. Plasma is the 4th state of matter which consists of ionized gas containing free electrons and ions where the electrons had broken from their orbits and is highly electrically conducive which is also the material of stars but also the distance between them that is space. Lightning is a process that represents the workings of plasma.
    Plasma can be seen as a force of chaos, the divine feminine generating energy, and also the collective unconscious that in which it connects at all levels. The dark matter that physicists talk about may in fact be plasma.
    Plasma as a geometrical structure is a toroidal field with upward and downward movement akin to the flux and reflux of water representing the tension between opposites and polarity. Plasma is also associated with the electromagnetic polarity shift of the gravity field and with wormholes. Yet plasma in all it's greatness it is not consciousness. It is merely a vessel for consciousness. Given the two polarities there must be a third force that would unite them. This toroidal field doesn't have direction. It is akin to the quantum wave function where it is a probability distribution and can be in multiple places at once yet in no place does it have position.
    The opposite of plasma is a metaphysical isomorphism that is representing a state of solid with a crystallized lattice structure at the atomic level, order, as well as consciousness(whitehole/origin/creation- blackhole/void/destruction). It is then it's counterpart consciousness that through it's solid state and from all potentiality it collapses into position. I hadn't found a physical correspondence for this one yet but I only have it's metaphysical descriptions that I mentioned.
    Now the way I imagined it is interesting that your video and the way the generation of ideas it is similar. I think there's another distinction that can be made. The plasma field as a toroidal structure is like a fork which allows for potential paths of development. Such as how from Immanuel Kant idealism and nihilism came as it bifurcated. Now it's opposite is a singular direction like a sword and which is truth that is many times associated with a sharp object like a sword. So the metaphysical and physical correspondent of plasma needs to be straight.
    The way I'm imagining this is that you have like the pyramid of power and the eye of providence. Where the pyramid of power is the stratification of this plasma field into potentiality while the eye of providence is that which selects and collapses into actuality. The eye of providence is also represented as a sharp object while it is detached from the rest of the pyramid that without it it's dull.
    When you put the two together there would be creation and destruction, generation and collapse, life and death.
    Another thing is a fact that can be used which is that the speed of conscious thought in terms of processing power is merely 10 bits per second. But the processing speed of thought at the unconscious level is much higher. So the way I'm seeing this is that processing speed creates our perception of time where the toroidal structure of the plasma field of the unconscious creates the centrifugal force at which our thoughts move at high speeds accelerating(it's opposite would be centrifugal motion) and we use two common expressions "racing" and "train of thought" symbolizing high speeds of processing in thinking. That in which in this way the mind is actually associated to a kind of vehicle which is another discussion such as Plato chariot that represents the self.
    Given that we have the vehicle which moves at a high speed if we remain within the same frame of reference we also need to have a driver or pilot. The pilot here is the conscious thought that moves at less speeds than the vehicle itself. The actions and controls that a pilot employs are much slower than the speed of the overall vehicle.
    Now a computational equivalent to those metaphysics is that the vehicle and plasma having multiple directions and high processing speed it is akin multithreding which is the arhitecture that allows the highest computational speed in which two or more threads of execution can be present at the same time. However this is present mostly for mid to low level programming languages that have more control over memory. For something like a high level language like Python there's always at all times just a single thread of execution. Which this may represent the difference in functionality between the conscious and unconscious. Python for instance is also commonly used for quick sketches of ideas through scripting and implementation while other low to mid level languages are used for efficiency in memory management and performance. However in most apps and programs there's a combination of high and low or mid level languages where each is specialized for a given section of code and functionality of the program. They are two different emphasis of which it describes also for instance the triune brain theory that in which there's a hierarchical execution and distribution of power at the brain level where the neocortex which allows for metacognition is at the highest apex controlling conscious proceses while the reptilian brain is automating proceses and our states. Given this prioritization the reptilian brain is the default option when the metacognitive ability does not override it's process. So this can be seen as something as the high level brain our neocortex with its metacognitive ability is responsabile for the big picture stuff and has the highest priority in execution just as the single threaded Python as a high level language which represents our conscious processing. While low level brain of our reptilian brain is responsible for the nitty gritty and our day to day activities but also is automated and controls more proceses within the psyche than the higher functions of our brain just as the multithreded mid level programming language like C++ that has multiple threads of execution.
    Which this I think contrasts in two sides at the metaphysics of our being. There's the will and there's the intent. I think children most often are operating at this high level view through intent as a single threaded thinking process. Then as the ego fully forms and we became adults we tend to want to control the process and we employ will that is multithreaded with multiple threads of execution automating those tasks and taking care of them so that we may be protected which is precisely the role of the ego. So from the high level let things as they are through intent. We want to gain control over our reality as we see that our mere intent is not enough and we need to instead make the potential actuality and take responsability for ourselves and that's when we exert will.
    The way I'm seeing this with awarness as plasma and consciousness is that we can have stimuli as data that we are not conscious of yet are registered in our unconscious but when we became conscious of them we form information. Hence why I think Ai won't ever be able to be conscious. Ai is mostly a stochastic architecture based on probability distribution and it is the chinese room in which it sees symbols and tries to compute according to the rules it is given to associate them but ultimately it doesn't know chinese. It can't create information. He operates with data.
    So to conclude I think introducing the distinction between awarness and consciousness as separate proceses in our conscious. We can find in a way the possibility of freewill by my 3 axioms for freewill by generation of potential(1), collapse of potential(2), that allows for manipulation of potential(3), which results in self mediation that I define as freewill.
    Now we need to find the force and physical equivalent that could reconcile this tension between opposites in a system of 3 and achieve dialectical unity that includes and transcends it's parts. For that we pretty much need to know the trinity and what it is. There's a vid in this sense about portals from the Portal game and I think that explains how this could be possible but it's a high level reality that we hadn't been aware so far. And so freewill I think for most of human history was locked for we did not know the truth just as you said. I had in fact a dream that I was somewhere and there were like capsules that was divided in two. One capsule was approving in extracting what appeared as diamonds or rare resources while the other was disapproving of extracting those. If you did not enter into the one for extracting rare minerals. There was a counter somewhere that would define it as the other capsule of not extracting rare minerals.
    So I think truth is related somehow to freewill and also knowledge itself is as such combining subjective and objective experience which means that the object must relate with the subject and vice versa and that as such knowledge itself must be relatable. There's someone who said that information informs about something. You can't inform something absent a subject. And my further extension here is that data is operating with the object at a high distance while information is operating with the object in proximity to it via the relation between subject and object. Where information is consciousness and data is awarness and plasma. And the two somehow must relate. The dull pyramidal structure with its sharp third eye of providence head. As above so below.

  • @moversodyssey
    @moversodyssey Місяць тому

    Good information, but its the most unnatural sounding conversation I've ever heard. Like AI trying to mimic a human conversation.

    • @ZitterbartEscherBach
      @ZitterbartEscherBach  Місяць тому

      it is FULLY AI - I feed my own research and white papers into google LM, and then the machine turns it into digestible content, rather than galactic complexities :)

    • @moversodyssey
      @moversodyssey Місяць тому

      @@ZitterbartEscherBach It close enough to real human speech to be impressive, but the pace is off enough to feel unnatural. The way it's advancing I would give it another year or two and it will be indistinguishable.