Don't forget the myth that "satan rules hell". A lot of people believe that. No. Hell is the place where the devil and all his demons and those who are not written in the book of life will be punished for eternity.
Hell is a myth. Where in the bible does it say you will be punished for all eternity? That literally contradicts John 3:16. What it does say is that there will be a judgement. Eternal death.
After reading the Bible myself, I discovered that Jesus Christ is life Himself. Life is ultimately meaningless without God and I am glad that the Lord showed me and many others His mercy.
@@griffin9478 At least I’ll have lived a moral life and done objective good. So yes, I will sleep well. My question for you is, since God is real, where will you spend eternity?
@@kosefixUniverse from nothing, multiverses, primordial soup, billions of years, human evolution from apes, junk DNA are all examples of false science
"I'm not arguing for Christianity in this video, I'm just arguing for the objective historical facts" That's called arguing for Christianity. Christ is king ✝ EDIT: Fun fact, the Islamic Golden Age was about 1% Islam and 99% the Persians.
Nowadays, unfortunately, the persecution of the first Christians is forgotten. I highly recommend the historical novel by the Polish Nobel Prize winner Henryk Sienkiewicz "Quo Vadis"
@@giantotter319, In the case of medieval works, what we currently know is interpreted based on ancient accounts (which have been preserved directly or indirectly), so I don't think they are lying much in this matter. "Quo Vadis" is not ahistorical. It is a historical NOVEL, so it was not written in those times (you can see from the author's last name), but Sienkiewicz really had a good historical workshop, and the novel reflects the spirit of those times
@@jakubkosz1009 There is plenty of ancient sources which were preserved through greeks or muslims. Christian authors have changed some of the narratives, though - namely the persecution of christians. For example the idea that Nero was insane and hated does not fit the way he was described at his time - he was bad at running rome and spent a lot of time on nonsense, but compared to many emperors he was almost capable. Also pretty popular in eastern part of the empire. Also Ogniem i Meczem is better.
Yes, I have read and re-read this novel from my teen years. I grew up in West Germany after WWII. My father was in the USAF and a "history nerd". We lived near Trier and often visited the Roman ruins and my father told my sister and I about how the Roman's "threw" Christians to the lions and other wild animals in the amphitheater. This book helped make me a more devout Christian. I have an original edition.
@@jilledmondson6894, as a Pole and Catholic I'm glad you liked it :) I am at my 22s and I just discovered this for myself (but generally in my country it is widely known). I saw that this reading allowed me to better understand my faith too (its sources, my behavior as a non-believer who is undergoing transformation, etc.). Greetings :)
I'm taking AP World History, and one of the first things my teacher said about Christianity was that Jesus never claimed to be the Messiah and that Christians argued this was due to his humility. I shared with him John 4:25-26 immediately after, and he said, "Oh, 'll look into it then." saying he studied world religions as an interest. Deception is causing misinformation. Please make sure we as Christians know the word so we can to tell the truth from a historical and spiritual standpoint. Jesus Christ needs the representative he deserves, albeit we can never fully and perfectly represent him, at least we can do our best by the Holy Spirit working mightily in us, giving us the desire to do his will.
@@weepingj While that's true, it's also a common apologetics story. In reality, an AP history teacher has no business bringing up these claims about Jesus, and if they do it as part of class, how is it they never herd the verse before?
I’m from a Catholic majority country, the anti-Catholic propraganda here is so much that I one of the reasons I decide to give a chance to Catholicism after more than 10 years as an atheist and anti-Catholic, was my perception that how school brainwashed me. From Thinking that Che was a hero, French Revolution was a common people movement, not an elite movement, slavery was a one sided thing, which whites kidnapping blacks in Africa, and the Church was the biggest villain of all history.
How Bible agree with science:- God create day& night before sun😂😂 Job 26:11 heaven has pillars😂😂 Psalm 58:8 slug melts during walking 😂😂 Proverbs 6:7 Ants don't have ruler😂😂 Genesis 1:11 plants exist before sun 😂😂 Leviticus 11:6 The rabbit, though it chews the cud😂😂
Good people do go to heaven but not because they earned it. Be careful how you word things like this especially around children and non-believers. You will confuse people.
@@aaronharlow2137 So no one is good. All the infants god killed in the flood? All evil. The 1000+ infants that die every day. All evil? All deserving of hell? Any religion that teaches you all kids are worthless wretches worthy of eternal torture is vile. Any God that tricks you into being born owing him worship or else be evicted into hell is a horrible being and even worse landlord. Only by indoctrination of children or preying on the poor, drug addicted, and desperate, only through war, colonization, and threat of punishment are you able to coerce people into believing this nonsense. I have no problem letting my kid read any religious book including the Bible because I didn't indoctrinate them by saying there is only 1 truth and I'm the one that discovered it. All contradictions are false. I teach them to think critically and evaluate what they see and read. If Christians did this the religion would be dead in a decade, not counting the already indoctrinated.
@@Ask_Xi It doesn't say young girls, but women and children (as separate nouns). And, where does it say to make them into slaves? If you interpret in a modern English context a translation of the Hebrew, then you can abstract it enough to metaphorically mean keep alive as in keep servants for yourself, but a charitable reading or just the actual Hebrew says to cause them to live amongst you. It's not enslaving them, it never says that anywhere in the text in Numbers 31, it's telling them to adopt them into the tribes of Israel. They killed everyone who was married, probably because you hold an allegiance to those you're married to (God considers the married as becoming One), but someone who is without allegiance to the soldiers of the Midianites can be part of the Israelite tribe.
@@koderamerikaner5147 It says kill all the men young or old. And "keep alive for yourselves" implies as slaves. Also right after, when they take account of the plunder they list 32000 women there among the cattle gold and treasures.
That's the same as "all the 'christians' saying they make '47k a month with the help of some broker on whatsapp' alone were enough for me to reject christianity.. Or the videos that claim "God has sent you $3.9 billion! Open the video to receive" were alone to enough to reject christianity..
5:00 - One thing about the Christianity spreading through colonization. The King of Congo, converted to Christianity and even changed his name to a Christian name after a group of 150 Portuguese went there preaching the Gospel. 200 years BEFORE any colonization effor from European nations. Atheists just refuse to admit that the Christian message was so attactive to people. Because they think if they concede this, they are saying the message is true.
Bro my ancient world history teacher was talking about religion, and we had an assignment called “Islamic achievements” and half of the “Islamic” achievements were done by the Catholic Church 😭😭 like science and hospitals
@@giantotter319 The only one lost here is you, he never said anything about anyone doing science for achievements, he said that for a school assignment he had to read up about modern innovations achieved by Islam, but half of the innovations we're done by the church. You call him lost yet you managed to completely misunderstand what the dude was trying to say all because of one word LMAO
@@AoMohammed Congratulation on repeating the same thing he wrote, guess that's only thing you all are good for. Point still stands. And as far as those christian innovations go, most in one way or another originated with greeks, muslims or jews. Christians just had a talent for codifying it. That was the case with math, healthcare, even cuisine.
@giantotter319 you have no idea what your talking about. Christianity invented modern science. Not the Greeks or the Muslims or any eastern cultures. Because Christianity gave many of the axioms and presupositions that are necessary for modern science to work. Generations of historians and sociologists have discovered many ways in which Christians, Christian beliefs, and Christian institutions played crucial roles in fashioning the tenets, methods, and institutions of what in time became modern science. They found that some forms of Christianity provided the motivation to study nature systematically.[52] - Noah J. Efron
@@giantotter319The three pre-conditions just discussed-the translations, the universities, and the theologian-natural philosophers-laid a foundation for the emergence of modern science because they provided an environment that was conducive to the study of science. . . . And without the support of the theologians and the Church, the medieval universities would have been unable to institute the science-logic-natural philosophy curriculum that began Western Europe’s long, uninterrupted involvement with scientific thought and problems Grant, The Foundations of Modern Science
@@griffin9478All the pagans are mouthy until God raises up more dedicated pagans to hand your ass to you right before He comes to deal with you personally. Islam is riding high at one quarter of all people on earth and one quarter of all land and our governments have been giving them a free pass into our countries for a while at this point. Mouth off now before you hear the shahada slipping out from between your lips because its coming sooner than you will be able to accept and we both know you lack the constitution and the masculinity to speak thusly to them.
@@griffin9478which is why i can confidently say Jesus Christ is King and santa claus isnt. Because while no records of a red fat man flying around exist as real proof, we have plenty of the life of Jesus Christ, and his resurrection. However, we both know you didnt make this statement in good faith
@@donut9719 Through colonialism, hell yeah. Do you understand how that's wrong, or do you need to hear about the murdered native children in christian schools in canada?
It always kills me when I hear people say "Christians are just as violent as followers of the 7th-century prophet" and then they somehow try to compare a couple of sentences in Deuteronomy, and a few crusaders, with 1300 years of imperialism from the mideast and a huge percentage of that prophet's scriptures. And in current times, the only people I have ever seen politely knocking on doors with literature and kind persuasion are various self-proclaimed Christians (whether or not you want to grant Witnesses and/or LDSers that moniker).
if someone tells you christianity caused the crusades( 3 milion deaths in almost 200 years) then tell them atheism caused ww2, stalins soviet union and maos regime( ~150 milion deaths in ~50 years)
How did atheism cause WWII? Pretty sure WWII was caused by nationalism, fascism, militaristic jingoism, and the Treaty of Versailles. And antisemitism, sure. But atheism? Yeah, I don’t think atheism caused WWII. Also correlation does not equal causation. Just because Mao and Stalin were atheists doesn’t mean atheism caused them to commit atrocities. Also, even if I grant *everything* you say as true (I.e. atheism killed 150 million), this entire argument is a whataboutism fallacy. Instead of addressing the deaths caused by Christians, you don’t deny they did it and that it was wrong, you just say “well atheists are worse,” which doesn’t vindicate Christianity. That would be like, if I said “9/11 was bad,” and someone replied “hey less than 3000 died in 9/11 but six million died in the Holocaust, why are you criticizing Al Qaeda buddy the Nazis are worse.”
@@caseycrowe3805 It's a bad argument yes. But to deny that the fruit of atheistic ideology "nationalism, fascism, militaristic jingoism" involved in a large amount of deaths in the 21st century is a failure to understand history and sociology. The fact is that atheism doesnt generate a worldview that ends with the overall benefit of mankind.
How did they come to that conclusion? Since they probably mean medieval times, Paul of Aegina and the Byzantine medical community would like to have a word. Just because they were working with theories(like the 4 Humors) that are outdated and completely absurd now doesn't mean it was a dark age
@@RabidLeech1 I assume its because they literally thought demons were possessing people during epileptic episodes rather than trying to figure out it was uncontrollable fires in the brains neurons.
@@nickhadknacks-z9qHow dare those backwards people not have access to time machines to be able to use EEG! Who cares that it wasn't invented until *checks notes* 1924(some research on electrical activity going back to the 1870s)?! That goes against this narrative I've built!
Science and christianity or theism period, are two beliefs that do not contradict each other. You can believe in both, and both come together perfectly
No, science and any religion are contradictory. Faith cannot coexist with rationality. What is not ultimately testable and repeatable is not science. A good scientist never says 'oh, this must be real!' but has to constantly look and see if things work to declare that what they have is a working theory. Any loyalty to any God is thus contradictory to how science works
One time, I was reading a history book in high school that erroneously stated that the Gospels were "..filled with contradictions". That's a false and very biased statement to make, and its totally unnecessary with regard to Jesus and the writings of his disciples.
One of worse myths is that Galileu was like the proto-atheist trying to save us from Dark Ages. When when you read his works. He argues for Heliocentrism, was a better explanation to Joshua 10 in which God stopped the Sun to help Jews win the war. He argued that the theory of Aristotles about the planets moving with disks didn’t make sense, in the light of this story.
Galileo was a devout Christian who Challenged the Church authority at the time. Why would anyone stupidly think that he was a proto atheist who oppose Jesus 😂
Another myth is that Christianity does not treat women well. Salve Regina Oh, and as of today, it’s her birthday as well! Happy birthday, Mother Mary!🥳
@@user-Strong.Trinitarian Except Christian organizations consistently fight to hold back women’s rights right up to the modern day. This is like telling a plebeian to be grateful to the Roman Senate for overthrowing the monarchy to institute the republic when those same senators were weaponizing said republic to screw them over at every turn.
@@user-Strong.Trinitarian My reply got deleted. I said nothing even remotely edgy or TOS breaking. UA-cam’s management keeps getting worse by the fucking year. To be clear it’s almost certainly not RZ’a fault, it’s UA-cam’s worthless automated content moderation. They’re likely using an LLM to filter comments, which is insane because it effectively means nobody even knows what the rules are and they’ll keep changing as the LLM intakes more data. I hate AI so much like you wouldn’t believe.
I wasn't home schooled but I have a feeling that high school is an attempt to adjust you to a sleep deprived 9-5 life Even middle age peasants got more time off than we do now
@@reisen9235 Exactly. It's completely insane that we teach people how long they should sleep and then just make them wake up at 7am(at least in my school).
Any idea in the society is either alien or common sense. Just look at Covid, the media went from Masks are God sent cure to Yeah the masks were useless and everybody knew this from the starts, it was just better than nothing. People will keep repeating that Christianity is anti-science until someday they will say, of course Christianity isn’t anti-science. Nobody never claimed this
I’m curious why you think that. Do you think science was handed down to us by God Himself (directly or indirectly)? And if so, why didn’t He provide this earlier, in the Bible itself, like so many people expect?
Remember: science is perfectly okay to study as a Christian. I have never seen anything wrong with studying God's creations and how they work. It's wonderful to work with science.
Look your probably right in many ways. But how is this helping seriously. How is statement public school is horrible helpful or good in any way. I'm a Christian I am going to public. Every single public is different. If someone told you all x is bad you would totally disagree. Like I highly doubt you would say scab. if you want to change the systems don't sit on the sidelines
It's not a sin for a Christian family to carefully make use of public school, as long as they monitor what is being taught and they are ready to pull their kids out if necessary. But as/if society improves we will come to realize that educating kids is way outside of the government's job and the government's aptitude.
@@nicanorfredricksbirdrealm228 Eh, maybe in part. But it seems to me that part is limited mostly to the fact that both have the universe beginning to exist.
Genesis doesn’t line up with Big Bang Theory at all. First of all, the theory says nothing about the beginning of the universe, only the universe in its current form. Take another look at Genesis 1. The Earth is unformed, and there is a vast ocean. That’s not empty. It actually aligns with an ancient model of the Earth: A flat disk where the sky is water contained in a solid firmament and held up by pillars. This idea pops up in various other places, especially Job 38-39.
@@seanpierce9386the Bible does not support the flat earth theory. you are referencing Genesis 1, yet are ignoring the Bible saying that light was created first, which holds to the Big Bang theory and our modern understanding of electromagnetism, amongst the foundation of all universal constants that hold space, matter and time together. Christians do not typically hold to a flat earth view of the world, simply because the Bible does not confirm a flat earth creation of the world. The Bible isn’t primarily a scientific text, but people weren’t as ignorant as we think they were, considering Babylon had access to calculus dating back to the construction of the tower of Babel.
@@oxideaitunim What we call the speed of light is a universal speed limit. Photons just happen to travel at that speed through a vacuum, and they slow down in a medium due to the properties of waves. We have no idea what particles were created first, but given that the physics of the early universe were completely different than our own, it cannot have been anything we would call light. You’re probably just using this fact as a memorized apologetic. I would encourage you to think about the problem yourself. You can’t have it both ways. Is the Bible scientifically accurate or not? If it is, then everything should be totally accurate with no mistakes. If it’s not, then why would a God-inspired book contain only the understanding of the world available to the people who wrote it? This is especially relevant in Job, where God is specifically trying to display His unknowable greatness with no need to appear reasonable to the people at the time.
I think these myths are so pervasive that I often hear it from non-believers when I mentioned that I'm a Christian (I live all the way in SE Asia). People would try to argue with me about the bible over some grounds that they themselves aren't sure about. But I think all Christians should be equipped and ready to confront these arguments (1 Peter 3:15) hence why theology is essential. Thank you for the video!
"Now go and smite Amalek and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass." 1 Samuel 15:3, KJ21 Can you help me make this a just command from God? It is the children part i have a problem with...
When you are reading the bible you need to read it with the cultural context. The meaning of the verse yiu sent is not the complete physical murder of the amalek ppls but the destruction of their cultureal identity. The verse is akin to more like how ppl today says i completely murdered the other team etc.
@@thomb.1326 Leviticus 18 explains it. These people were disgusting and they condemned their children and their civilisations to destruction...much like our own culture is apparently aiming for.
@Rocky-ur9mn 1.Why is it so specific in that even the infants and cattle are to be destroyed? 2.Its the COMMAND from God to Samuel, (very clear from the text if it is not misstranslated, wich gives a rise to many other problems if so) NOT the actual action that happend, since Saul actually didnt follow through, he Spared the King and some of the better cattle to offerd to God. THEN he gets confronted by the profet Samuel, who reprimanded him for sparing the cattle and the King, Samuel then Beheads the King, Saul abdicates and David becomes the new king and God regrets that he made Saul king. I know that the Amalekites werent wiped out, they reappear later in the texts. My problem is again with the COMMAND OF SLAUGHTER and the reprimand for not following through, or the claim of inerrancy of the texts themselves (Jesus own words)
I'll also add that a lot of Galileo's issue was that he was being kind of a jerk(still a lot of historical debate about whether this was intentional) by putting the Pope's objections, in a book he wrote in Italian(writing in the common language, rather than Latin was a very anti-establishment move at the time), in the mouth of a character named Simplicio, meaning buffoon, and that he refused to show his work and answer the Pope's theological concerns. This was also only about a decade or two after Martin Luther's 95 Theses so the Catholics were very paranoid about any challenges to their supposed authority at the time.
Galileo was twisting scripture to justify his belief, not because we Catholics were paranoid about authority. Also he was teaching his theory as fact while not having sufficent proof. Go to your local uni and teach some crack pot idea with NO PROOF and see how long you stay as a teacher.
He also claimed to be on firmer scientific ground than he was. Yes, he turned out to be mostly correct, but he didn't have enough evidence at the time.
It also didn't help Galileo's case that his model of planetary motion... didn't conform to the history of observations and could not make accurate predictions for the future. A lot of folks get wrapped up in the fact he was right about heliocentrism, but ignore the fact he was completely WRONG regarding orbits, Galileo believed orbits to be perfect circles. As Kepler later figured out, orbits are NOT circles, they're elliptical, and that makes a MASSIVE difference when you start trying to use circle orbits to calculate the positions of planets. Meanwhile, the model of the solar system in use at the time, a hybrid model that actually assumed the sun, moon and outer planets orbited Earth while the Inner planets orbited the sun, was actually MORE PREDICTIVE of planetary motion and BETTER FIT the historically recorded positional data. In other words, Galileo was actually in many ways LESS scientific than the Catholic Church at the time, as he refused to consider other options even when his model did not fit observed data.
@@jdotoz No, he wasn't "mostly correct", his model was less predictive of planetary motion than either the full geocentric model complete with epicycles or the hybrid model that I mentioned. The ONLY things his model got correct were the relative positions of the planets AND heliocentrism. But his model could not be taken, plugged in any date, and then accurately predict the location the planets would be in the night sky. Thus he was wrong about SIX OTHER aspects of his model (the orbits of the known planets at the time). Last I checked getting that much of an assignment observably wrong was a failing grade. :P
referring to the thumbnail, my school got like 10x more liberal this year, last year it was pretty much not political at all, this year they had a whole ass 30 minute talk to not disrespect gender identity and sexual orientation and to be inclusive and shit, but they skimmed over racism in like 5 secs
Not to mention, many scientists were not only Christians but owed their discoveries and inventions to Christianity and the Bible. Matthew Fontaine Maury was a naval officer and the founder of oceanography. He discovered the currents of the ocean after reading Psalm 8 and dedicating his life to it. Such currents are used today for shipping routes, freight and oil distribution, and underwater cables.
"many scientists were not only Christians but owed their discoveries and inventions to Christianity and the Bible." I disagree that "many" scientist claimed that their faith allowed them to make scientific discoveries. Regardless you have only cited one example. can you cite 3 more so that your quantifying word "many" is true? thank you my friend.
I usually dumb it down for atheists but here's how it works in the Old Testament: Israel: Help us! God: Sure. Israel in desert betrays God. God spanks Israel then says: I barely saved you and you turn your backs on me? I'm gonna leave! " Israel: Please don't, we're sorry. God: Then worship me like you promised. Israel: Can we have a King? God: But I'm your King. Israel: Please? God: Sure. Here's a nice kid, David. Later... Israel: Look at Baal, he looks nice. Let's worship him. God: Not again. God spanks Israel. God: They are so forgetful, so I'll send them prophets to remind them. Israel: We don't like these prophets, they keep saying bad things. Let's chase them away. God spanks Israel again. Israel says sorry. God: I forgive you. So much so that I'll send you a Messiah. Israel: Cool. God: So stop chasing my prophets away. Later... Israel betrays God and kills prophets. God spanks Israel. God: This is your last warning. Your punisment will last 400 years since I just can't get through to you. Come back when you are called. Thus it was the reason why He was called the long-suffering, all-loving and forgiving God.
@@marlon8095 The children of God, the people that are made in God's image, people who are in the same religion as you, people in the comments who are religious, people who The Lord gives visions to, people who The Lord gives missions to...etc.
I find it interesting that a public school is the thumbnail for this video because here in New Zealand public schools often have better values and beliefs than the 'Christian' private schools. Public schools here also tend to have a wider and diverse groups of people than private schools and so religion, while not taught, is often discussed among students. My public school in Christchurch has a very large student bible study that kids attend and religion is not mentioned in our science classes and our teachers allow us to hold our own beliefs. Just my random thoughts, great video, keep up the good work RZ😊
@@griffin9478 So there was nothing then there was something then that something was stable enough to form but wasn't really that stable or something from nothing caused it to explode thus the big bang.
Genesis1 takes its story from enoma elish which in both a god is splitting the water (which goddess Tiamat which is chaotic dragon with many heads) and those splitted parts become heaven & earth and bible refer to that dragon in (psalm74:13) and many other places by name leviathan ;it’s polytheistic story with many errors
Most Christians need to know that just wearing a cross necklace or just going to church doesn’t make you a Christian. Take control of your faith and build a relationship with Christ!
But if you don’t follow Christ even after being Baptized, are you still Christian? The definition of Christian is a follower of Christ, so wouldn’t you not be a Christian?
What part of the Nicene Creed, would the Filioque be apart of that? Both Orthodoxy and Western Churches have different views and each redefine the Trinity.
0:45 There is a really good video by a UA-camr known as InspiringPhilosophy on this called “Christianity's War Against Science Debunked!” if you want to learn more.
Being colonized by Christian colonists and conquistadors was the best thing to happen in the western hemisphere since the first people got there. You can have a colony of Christians proselytizing or Aztecs brutally sacrificing 10,000 people to a demon and Caribs eating each other. The choice seems pretty clear. And the crusades were about taking back territory that Muslims had conquered from Christians
The idea that Christianity questioned and opposed scientific progress was touted throughout my educational career. It's sad that people still think this is true. Most Universities have their roots in Christianity.
@@Colddirector nope, the catholic church in spain was what funded Columbus' journey. They must have known the world wasn't flat to send someone around the world. Please do research
Eastern Catholicism is just Catholics who larp as Orthodox and they don't even do a good job, like they combine Eastern and western customs in some places so its just so weird
I dislike Eastern Catholicism for how it tends to be seen. Eastern Catholics portray it as this kind of "reasonable middle ground" between Catholicism and Orthodoxy, but then you realise many of their beliefs are heretical to Catholics and it drags the Catholics down by showing that they're willing to tolerate literal heresies for the sake of unity and having more groups in communion with the pope.
For those interested...Truth: 1) Christianity includes science 2) Christianity spread because it's the only God created / human discovered Way of Life 3) Christianity unites, but imperfect humans (including dedicated spiritually immature Christians) oppress themselves and others 4) Christians temporarily go to the paradise component of current heaven (e.g. soul is saved) and everyone else temporarily goes to Hades. When the new heaven/earth is here, on Judgement Day, either each human's soul is redeemed and their spiritual body is united with God and others in the new heaven eternally, or the human's soul is destroyed and spiritual body is eternally separated from God in hell. 5) One of God's many types of perfection is teleios (constantly spiritually maturing), hence God from Old to New Testament. 6) There is one Truth. The rare "narrow is the path" spiritually maturing Christians are one with the Truth: God gives free will (there is no predestination), real baptism (e.g. establishing spiritual connection with God) naturally eventually happens after a human starts and grows a relationship with God, etc. 7) Christians have discovered more of God and His/our reality over time...but the Truth hasn't changed.
My school NEVER taught any of that stuff. Every teacher I have had as been Christian or just never touch religion at all, my science teacher is Catholic, my old history teacher spent a lesson all on B.C. and A.D. and how it does not stand for after death. And everyone who went to my school was Christian, I know only 2 kids who are atheist, and they don't even debate about it, they respect that people believe that God is real and is the Lord. My public school is one of the best, I hope you all have good ones too, and if you don't, make them good ones.
6:50 John Brown was kind of my gateway drug to conversion, I'm from where he was born and that motivated me to study him. The lyrics "John Brown was John the Baptist of the Christ we are to see, Christ who of the bondsmen shall the liberator be, and soon throughout the sunny south the slaves will all be free, his soul is marching on- The conflict that he heralded, he looks on from Heaven to view, on the army of the Union with its flag red, white and blue, and Heaven shall ring with anthems over the deed they mean to do, his soul is marching on" from the original "John Brown's Body" lyrics printed in The Tribune on December 16, 1861 made me weep. They still do most of the time.
One note regarding ending slavery without a big war in England - they didn’t have to use violence. Slavery, specially agricultural slavery, wasn’t deeply entrenched into the economy of half the country, unlike America.
@@outmywritemind1739 I don't just blindly believe Christianity. I have tried Islam, and Judaism. I have a good substantial knowledge of church history and i can easily explain all essentials of the Christian faith. I understand apologetics: the nine extrabiblical sources for Jesus that still coincide with the bible and how the bible is 99.5 identical to the original manuscript. The world is not eternal, there's a creator and that's God. You who doesn't believe has not been predestined by God to believe and will be damned by your sinful nature. Yes i also believe in Calvinism, God's absolute sovereignty. Trust me, i myself cannot have the faith but it was God who changed the disposition of my heart to believe in him. May I preserve in the faith he has given and the Good Lord who starts his work in me shall finish it, Amen.
I don't just blindly believe Christianity. I have tried Islam, and Judaism. I have a good substantial knowledge of church history and i can easily explain all essentials of the Christian faith. I understand apologetics: the nine extrabiblical sources for Jesus that still coincide with the bible and how the bible is 99.5 identical to the original manuscript. I also believe in Calvinism- God's ABSOLUTE sovereignty that means that if you don't believe in God it's because he hasn't called you to his from outside time while in time it seems you have rejected him but it is an uno reverso card 🥱
Just so everyone knows.. the Catholics and protestants agreed a long time ago that both their understandings of what consitutes salavtion is legitante . Both agree the other is saved
Im a Christian; but also a longical person. One of the things people get wrong about Christianity or religion in general, is that if we belive in God, we cant be rational or logical beings. But that isnt true. God wants us to be logical beings. He wants us to think for ourselves. But when we use science and reson against Him; that's when it bbwcomes wrong.
@@ichsehsanders there are lots of evidence that a world wide flood did not happen, there is no way humans were created just one day after ALL animals were created.
I'm not saying you need to believe it, but I seriously recommend taking an actual deep research dive into young earth Creationism. It's not some anti-science movement. It's tens of thousands of Christian scientists in multiple scientific organizations applying as direct a scientific process as possible to confirm or deny their theories. This whole video is about "debunking lies told about Christianity," yet less than 5 minutes in you reinforce one of the biggest lies about a very large number of Christians.
@@Gr8Imres Mutation issues, genetic decay, irreducible complexity, apparent age, entropy, the entirety of the fossil record? I'm sorry, I thought we were just randomly throwing out buzz words with no explanation.
Saying that Christianity did not contribute to slavery is disingenuous when the Bible condones it at numerous points and given how it took almost two milennia to end it, it seems far more the product of cultural change than a religious command to me
@@CoryW-h3q Regardless, the credit Christianity can take for ending slavery is at best limited when the text itself condones it at multiple points, and it took like a milennia and a half of Christian hegemony for its abolition to even be on the table.
@@CoryW-h3q That doesn't exactly mean much when religious convictions inspire people to do horrible things as well. You can't have it both ways, if Christianity wants credit for the good things done in its name, it also deserves blame for the terrible things done in its name.
@@Colddirector well no because one is to the letter and the other is to man's Interpretation through their wicked hearts, not following the hermeneutics of the scriptures
11:32 rather than the test paper swap analogy, here's a better suggestion: imagine a poor villager woman who has nothing going on for her. Suddenly a prince decided to marry her. Now she's suddenly rich, because her name is added to everything he has.
Glad you're as insistent on the "Christianity is not anti-science" point as you are. Speaking as someone who is both Baptist in theology but also accepting of things like evolution, I often feel like I'm stuck in the middle of the Conflict Theory hitting me from both directions when I mention I'm not a YEC. My fellow conservative evangelicals tend to be YEC, although thankfully, nobody has called me a heretic, and often think I'm not being faithful to the text(Ignoring the many textual issues of YEC like the Tree of Life problem in Gen 3:22-24 that you've mentioned before and why the tree needed to be "guarded" if it was simply an obedience thing, or the question of how Day and Evening could exist and be 24-hour periods before the Sun and Moon were a thing, or how Adam and Eve had a frame of reference of death pre-Fall as shown in Gen 2:17 and 3:4, or why the animals needed to be "subdued" if everything was peaceful in the Animal Kingdom before the Fall, or how plants which are also living things could be food before death.) and atheists will think I'm inherently illogical for rationally coming back(I had almost completely lost my faith in college due to being confronted with secular biblical theory despite being at a Baptist college, along with things in my personal life) to the idea that God exists at all. That idea that Christianity and mainstream science are incompatible is beyond frustrating. Even those YEC who are scientific about it like my pastor(who is a fantastic man of God btw, not attacking him or his faith here) reject mainstream science. Think we all need to have a bit more grace on that question and accept that it's an issue that strong, reasonable Christians, can disagree on.
I don't really see what the issue is with, or without, Young Earth. God could have made the Earth at any time and just added all the stuff to make it look like it existed for longer. In Minecraft there are fossils and villages that look like they've been there a long time but those didn't naturally form one day long ago, they were just created recently for the purpose of making the world look like it was old. It's like Last Thursdayism pretty much. If the earth was young but made to look old, we would have no way to prove it.
@@danksmemington362I don't necessarily have an issue with most YEC people. I disagree with them and do have issues with those who will go around claiming those like me are heretics and saying that any other view means you're not a serious Christian but not with YEC people in general(most of the people in my church family are YEC after all.) They are good, solid Christians, and I fully acknowledge and respect their faith and viewpoints.
Science actually bought me to Christ lol. As the father of quantum physics said (paraphrased): a gulp from the glass of science will make you an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass Jesus is waiting for you."
I am a Seventh-Day Adventist and we should get together sometime over Discord, Zoom etc. to exchange ideas. I welcome you to learn about our beliefs so you may present an accurate representation and can either refute or agree with. I am also interested in learning about your points, though I have seen many of your videos and like them for the most part. Thank you and may God bless.
I have more intelectual respect for you guys seven days Adventists then for other types of Protestant in the basis of consistency. The believe that saints are alive in heaven and can intercede for you is as old as the believe that Sunday is the new Shabbat because of Jesus resurrection on Sunday. And if such believes are wrong, the Sunday believe is worse than the Intercession Belief. But somehow Protestants only reject the intercession tradition, they agree with the Sunday tradition, I don’t understand why. If the Catholic tradition are wrong. God will be more merciful towards people trying to talk to saints in heaven. Then to people changing the day of the Lord.
@@Chance_Rice Yes, I was raised an SDA. So what? Does that mean I cannot do my own research? That I follow blindly without testing their claims against the Bible? Just because someone was raised a certain way does not me that they do not do their own research. If you can show me in the Bible where I am wrong I will recant everything. But if you cannot then the truth must be accepted.
0:45 also about the scientific contributions. Don’t forget the massive contributions by our fellow orthodox brothers in the Byzantine Empire, virtually all of their Byzantine scientists and philosophers were Greek yet they were also devout orthodox Christian who became monks and bishops. Byzantine Greece produced polymaths in the medieval period such as Isidore of Miletus, John Philoponus and Leo the mathematician. Greece 🇬🇷 is essential in Christian history and science
I went to catholic schools throughout my life, and it just made me despise christianity even though it has taken me YEARS to deal with my traumas I'm finally starting to return to the faith not as a catholic though(YET)
Nope that happened since the 1st century because of Jesus resurrection. Justin Martyr had written about celebrating Sunday as the Lord's day 200+ years before the council
@@FelonyVideosLook into the way Messianic Jews treat the Sabbath, as they are the direct descendants of the Jewish Christians. They don't have one 'Sabbath', they practice TWO Sabbaths, the regular Jewish Sabbath, and the gathering of the Saints together with Gentiles (aka Sunday) They even find Adventists doctrine a clear misunderstanding of Scripture, as they understood that under the Law of Grace, Jesus IS the Sabbath and its fulfillment, and they can rest anytime, but they have to obey the Torah still to win over their Jewish brethren, hence that solution.
Gregor Mendel, the Father of modern genetics was a Catholic Priest. Robert Boyle, who defined elements, compounds, and mixtures was an Anglican. Francis Collins, invented positional cloning is an atheist turned Christian.
newton was an alchemist. Does that mean alchemy is a good thing? Einstein was a deadbeat father. Does that mean being a deadbeat father is a good thing?
1: This is more of a modern phenomenon, nowadays biblical inerrancy contravenes scientific consensus pretty significantly; most famously with Evolutionary Biology. 2: That position is an oversimplification at best, but you calling most of those rulers “secular” is also. 3: Public school taught me that oppressors used Christianity to justify their actions as their opponents did. This is as close as a historical opinion you can get to being fact. Really not sure what you’re on about. 4: Public school never taught me Christianity is like that. What. 5: Again, what? Y’all must have had some weird-ass teachers. 6: Public school does disproportionately focus on the differences, but they have a limited time window to explain the Protestant reformation and its consequences. So I’ll give them a pass. They’re not allowed to teach Theology for Theology’s sake anyway. 7: I was taught Nicaea helped standardize Christian beliefs more so than “change” it.
Open Communist Arthur Miller has the monopoly on defaming the Puritans, specifically with his propaganda The Crucible being taught by retarded English teachers everywhere. It's difficult to fathom that by contrast, pretty much everybody you ever ask will have no idea what a "Holodomor" is. The death toll difference is only about 10-11 million minus 23 or so. Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you modern mass education!
Well, I wanted to make a joke about instead of having bad public education you have no public education at all, but I looked it up and your public education is pretty good. Stupid facts getting in the way of a good joke!
1 one. Agreed that Christianity is generally not opposed to Science, but fundamental Christianity in the US does, but extremists are not the norm. 2nd to me is half truth. More in the sense of those "secular" leaders paved the way and to call them secular is a potential misnomer and a defensive Strawman. Again with third and my opinion. Almost all traditional religions were pro slavery due to societal pressure and economics. I do agree several major Chrisitan groups were involved in emancipation too. Fourth point you brought up is a mhth in Chrisitan Theology. 5th is nuanced but yes it is a myth. 6th was a myth I never believed, but again somewhat nuanced. Core message I never believed changed in Christianity.
Heliocentrism was declared a heresy by the Catholic Church. Geocentrism was the dominant view and justified by a literal reading of several scriptures.
Heliocentrism was never declared as heresy by the Catholic Church. That is a lie perpetuated by Atheists. Galileo was excommunicated because a certain bishop did not like the way he treated him in favor of another bishop (and this channel discussed it before). Galileo was put under house arrest UPON GALILEO'S OWN REQUEST under that same bishop who supported him to prevent him from dying under that other bishop's hand.
@@NC-vz6ui what you said is a common Atheist lie. A simple study of Galileo's life just disproves this lie of yours, and the truth is much more dramatic. Heliocentrism is NOT the reason why Galileo was excommunicated. Galileo was placed under house arrest upon his own request under a bishop who supported his work. That same bishop encouraged him to defend his position, form his confession of repentance (even if there is no need for that), and still explain his view of heliocentrism. This is why hybrid theories exists that time, because Galileo's work is very hard to discredit.
Bruh, saying you shouldn't be Christian just because a few minor teachings today contradict older ones is like saying you shouldn't believe in science just because modern science teaches things people didn't used to believe.
The hell are you talking about? The derangement of even mentioning intellectual honesty while being religious is insulting enough, but then the arguments start. Christianity has opposed science. You say that Copernicus wasn't questioned because they were opposed to scientific advancement or anything, except for the fact that they believed in a God in direct contradiction to the science and their belief in a God led to them actively discrediting science. They didn't give Copernicus scrutiny, they gave him defamation despite Copernicus being a devout Catholic. No "scientist" had any evidence for the Earth being the center of the Universe, their source was the Bible and the Bible only. The Church has directly opposed scientific advancement up until the modern day at any point where their scripture tells them to turn a blind eye to reason or logic. Downplaying the "spread by conquest" claim misses the point of the claim. The point is that people were pressured into conversion through centuries of brainwashing. The Roman Empire used force to keep people united, and thus when Christianity became the official religion they were in a prime place to influence civilizations all across Europe and the Middle East. The Crusades were a direct response to Christians feeling threatened by some land no longer being occupied by Christians and the Pope thought that a good enough reason for them to die. Christianity still contributes to oppression. People in their desperate search for intellectualism stumble into religion and then the rest of society has to help them walk down the long road of recovery back into a safe state of mental health. It also can't be denied that Christians were pro-slavery because the Bible directly condoned it. Saying "Christians started abolition" is the most insane and misleading thing I have ever heard. In the United States, it was the South who explicitly said they have every right to hold slaves as property because God constructed the natural order as a totem pole and put black people at the bottom. Confederate President Jefferson Davis said "It was established by decree of Almighty God … it is sanctioned in the Bible, in both Testaments, from Genesis to Revelations" in 1859. It was Quakers who started the first abolition movements, who were a sect of Christians that were persecuted by Presbyterians and Catholics for decrying God's will and speaking out against slavery. Christianity doesn't say "good people go to heaven," thats correct. So why are you feigning praise for a deity that doesn't love or respect you? You can say what you want about the Old Testament, after all it's a fictional book so it's all up to your interpretation anyway, but yeah the consensus at church and from our pastors has been that God is harsher (but surely so out of love) in the Old Testament. It's almost like the testaments were written by different people with little literary talent. Yes, the Bible is up to your interpretation. The Bible is full of contradictions, and no Christians can agree. John 5:22 says God judges, John 12:47 says God does not judge. Luke 16:19 says Once a person dies there is no return from the grave, 1 Samuel 28:11 says Samuel returned from the grave. Romans 3:10 says There is no one that is sinless and Job 1:1 says Job was perfect and upright. You can further prove how little Christians truthfully adhere by the Bible by attending any American churches potluck dinners because there will be bacon and probably shrimp, both forbidden foods under Leviticus 11:7-10. The point is they claim the Bible is an absolute truth, and thats laughably untrue. Who cares on the last one? The Council of Nicaea hegemonized Christianity and strengthened it; we may never know if Christianity still would have blossomed as it did without the Council of Nicaea, so it's pointless to argue alternate history. Sure. Christianity has been mostly the same the entire time, but if you want me to believe your book is an absolute truth, why would there ever been any need to update or clarify anything? I hope that the next generation can be free from these conspiratorial vestiges you preach so society can begin building forward with love and understanding. Your book might have a lot to say about those values but so few adherents actually practice.
@@outmywritemind1739 The irony of your comment being massively intellectually dishonest. You didn't magically evolve from a magical exploding dot. Seek God.
Being one of the new generation currently finishing off year twelve I completly support what you have said after freeing myself from this conspiratorial garbage passed on to me by my parents and grandparents.
Christianity does not hinder science. It was a dark age where most people are illiterate. Churches often become center of learning for monks and supository of ancient knowledge. The catholic church only crack down on scientific researcher after protestant reformation.
His source if everything he read in the past 5 years since he converted and got interested in Christianity. Tell me one quote from the Video you find problematic and I’ll personally check the sources of the claim and bring it to you cause I agree and vouch for everything said in the video
I remember vividly in about 6th grade I believe. My teacher was teaching about Christianity, and when he got to Jesus he said that during that time period he got hung by a rope and not a cross, because cross crucifixions didn't exist in that time period. As a young Christian I was confused, but accepted it because school is always right, right? Wrong. I held onto that belief for years until I talked to my pastor and looked into it. It's much worse than we think.
@@jdotoz That's correct. The idea of a young earth doesn't come from human conjecture, it comes from the Bible. God is more than capable of creating something that appears older than it is. Jesus did just that when he turned water into wine.
11:35 is one of the most curious sections about salvation. I heard a sermon by a w tozer on this. He said that heaven isnt full of Earth's garbage. He said that to truly embrace Christ is to truly change into a good person. Certainly we ARE only saved through our faith of our LORD, but surely God wouldnt just overlook say, a pedo's sins just because he says he praises Christ. He would forgive him, but only if he was truly repentant. Part of the glory of God is that everybody has an individual relationship with him.
Don't forget the myth that "satan rules hell". A lot of people believe that. No. Hell is the place where the devil and all his demons and those who are not written in the book of life will be punished for eternity.
Remember Satan knew your god and wanted nothing to do with him and a lot of angels felt the same.
@@kevinkelly2162You don't even understand what it is that you're arguing. Please, if you're going to try this, try harder.
Hell is a myth. Where in the bible does it say you will be punished for all eternity? That literally contradicts John 3:16. What it does say is that there will be a judgement. Eternal death.
@@epsilon3821 try matthew 25:31-46
Oh, thanks for the clarification, Flowey.
The biggest lie about Christianity is that it’s false. Jesus is Lord.
Your comment makes no sense?
Oh wait I'm being dumb I've got the reading comprehension of a brick wall
Prove it then
@@alfieingrouille1528lol
@@banan-a-vr😂
Jesus is make believe.
Unfortunately, all these myths are spread by people who get their knowledge from Hollywood movies.
Gotta love the ultimate sin city spreading lies am I right?
Los Angeles has the most ironic name of any city on the planet
In every way possible it's hell on earth, city of Angels?, city of demons more like
Generalizing, but true to some extent.
Kinda makes you think about who’s making these Hollywood movies🤔
@@gucciapplesauce2021 New agers, secular people, hippies and other weirder people and artists who obviously don't believe in God
After reading the Bible myself, I discovered that Jesus Christ is life Himself. Life is ultimately meaningless without God and I am glad that the Lord showed me and many others His mercy.
Yes!
When I read the Bible, God opened my eyes and showed me Jesus is real and truly the Son of God!
life is meaningless with god as that means you've thrown all logic and rational thought out the window 😂😂😂 but have fun sleeping for all eternity
@@griffin9478 At least I’ll have lived a moral life and done objective good. So yes, I will sleep well. My question for you is, since God is real, where will you spend eternity?
@@Thatoneguy-pu8tyhe'll spend it in hell that's for sure 😂
@@griffin9478Bro did not listen to the video. Yap yap yap sucker
There is no conflict between religion and science, but a conflict between true science and false science.
Can’t agree more👍
You are right. False Science has the Pope as noble prize scientist.
If anyone tells you that science has disproved the existence of God, it's safe to ignore his religious opinions.
What is an example of false science?
@@kosefixUniverse from nothing, multiverses, primordial soup, billions of years, human evolution from apes, junk DNA are all examples of false science
"I'm not arguing for Christianity in this video, I'm just arguing for the objective historical facts"
That's called arguing for Christianity. Christ is king ✝
EDIT: Fun fact, the Islamic Golden Age was about 1% Islam and 99% the Persians.
The arabization of the middle east (and a little beyond) was horrible Iranians and Egyptians had such a cool culture before their fall too:(
What would a golden age of a religion even entail? I assumed everyone knew that that term refers to the Islamic world not the religion itself lol
Islamic Golden Age is 40% Assyrian and Melkite Christians who had knowledge of both Greek and Arabic so they helped translating classics into Arabic.
Al Ghazali would like a word with you
Atheists will tell me to be rational. And I am rational, which is why I am Christian.
🗿
What they consider to be "rational" is really just accepting a lot of modern pressupositions that came from the enlightment.
Christianity is literally the death of logic
😂
@@timhartman3359 I bet you feel really smart right now don’t you little Timmy
Nowadays, unfortunately, the persecution of the first Christians is forgotten. I highly recommend the historical novel by the Polish Nobel Prize winner Henryk Sienkiewicz "Quo Vadis"
Maybe because it's been widely misrepresented by salty medieval authors. Quo Vadis is ahistorical.
@@giantotter319, In the case of medieval works, what we currently know is interpreted based on ancient accounts (which have been preserved directly or indirectly), so I don't think they are lying much in this matter.
"Quo Vadis" is not ahistorical. It is a historical NOVEL, so it was not written in those times (you can see from the author's last name), but Sienkiewicz really had a good historical workshop, and the novel reflects the spirit of those times
@@jakubkosz1009 There is plenty of ancient sources which were preserved through greeks or muslims. Christian authors have changed some of the narratives, though - namely the persecution of christians. For example the idea that Nero was insane and hated does not fit the way he was described at his time - he was bad at running rome and spent a lot of time on nonsense, but compared to many emperors he was almost capable. Also pretty popular in eastern part of the empire. Also Ogniem i Meczem is better.
Yes, I have read and re-read this novel from my teen years. I grew up in West Germany after WWII. My father was in the USAF and a "history nerd". We lived near Trier and often visited the Roman ruins and my father told my sister and I about how the Roman's "threw" Christians to the lions and other wild animals in the amphitheater. This book helped make me a more devout Christian. I have an original edition.
@@jilledmondson6894, as a Pole and Catholic I'm glad you liked it :) I am at my 22s and I just discovered this for myself (but generally in my country it is widely known). I saw that this reading allowed me to better understand my faith too (its sources, my behavior as a non-believer who is undergoing transformation, etc.). Greetings :)
I'm taking AP World History, and one of the first things my teacher said about Christianity was that Jesus never claimed to be the Messiah and that Christians argued this was due to his humility. I shared with him John 4:25-26 immediately after, and he said, "Oh, 'll look into it then." saying he studied world religions as an interest. Deception is causing misinformation. Please make sure we as Christians know the word so we can to tell the truth from a historical and spiritual standpoint. Jesus Christ needs the representative he deserves, albeit we can never fully and perfectly represent him, at least we can do our best by the Holy Spirit working mightily in us, giving us the desire to do his will.
Your world history teacher saying that Jesus never claimed to be the Messiah sounds like something an Islamic person would say.
How can a history teacher be so ignorant?
And then you woke up and realized it was Saturday. The old student teaching the teacher plot twist.
@@user-ce8lr3ff6v Oh please, teachers can definitely be wrong or misinformed especially on a topic like history or religion, no plot twist here
@@weepingj While that's true, it's also a common apologetics story. In reality, an AP history teacher has no business bringing up these claims about Jesus, and if they do it as part of class, how is it they never herd the verse before?
I’m from a Catholic majority country, the anti-Catholic propraganda here is so much that I one of the reasons I decide to give a chance to Catholicism after more than 10 years as an atheist and anti-Catholic, was my perception that how school brainwashed me. From
Thinking that Che was a hero, French Revolution was a common people movement, not an elite movement, slavery was a one sided thing, which whites kidnapping blacks in Africa, and the Church was the biggest villain of all history.
God Bless Brother and welcome back, our you Cuban perchance?
How Bible agree with science:-
God create day& night before sun😂😂
Job 26:11 heaven has pillars😂😂
Psalm 58:8 slug melts during walking 😂😂
Proverbs 6:7 Ants don't have ruler😂😂
Genesis 1:11 plants exist before sun 😂😂
Leviticus 11:6 The rabbit, though it chews the cud😂😂
Marxism/Socialism/Communism is tied to Atheism/Satanism
Sounds like Argentina lmao
Most of the slave ships were owned by jews
I believed the good people go to heaven myth until I became a Christian. Amazing how badly the world is lied to.
Good people do go to heaven but not because they earned it. Be careful how you word things like this especially around children and non-believers. You will confuse people.
@stevied3400 there are no good people. No one is good but the Father
@@aaronharlow2137those who partake in the nature of God will be saved
@@aaronharlow2137 So no one is good. All the infants god killed in the flood? All evil. The 1000+ infants that die every day. All evil? All deserving of hell? Any religion that teaches you all kids are worthless wretches worthy of eternal torture is vile. Any God that tricks you into being born owing him worship or else be evicted into hell is a horrible being and even worse landlord.
Only by indoctrination of children or preying on the poor, drug addicted, and desperate, only through war, colonization, and threat of punishment are you able to coerce people into believing this nonsense. I have no problem letting my kid read any religious book including the Bible because I didn't indoctrinate them by saying there is only 1 truth and I'm the one that discovered it. All contradictions are false. I teach them to think critically and evaluate what they see and read. If Christians did this the religion would be dead in a decade, not counting the already indoctrinated.
@@aaronharlow2137God specifically deemed creation good, are we not creation?
I absolutely HATE when Christians juxtapose “old testament god” and “New Testament god.” It reeks of Marcionism.
What about Numbers 31 Where God commands Israelites to kill all the midianites but keep the young girls as slaves?
Well yeah, I imagine yall hating that. Those darn prophets, can't live with them, can't live without them.
@@Ask_Xi It doesn't say young girls, but women and children (as separate nouns). And, where does it say to make them into slaves?
If you interpret in a modern English context a translation of the Hebrew, then you can abstract it enough to metaphorically mean keep alive as in keep servants for yourself, but a charitable reading or just the actual Hebrew says to cause them to live amongst you. It's not enslaving them, it never says that anywhere in the text in Numbers 31, it's telling them to adopt them into the tribes of Israel.
They killed everyone who was married, probably because you hold an allegiance to those you're married to (God considers the married as becoming One), but someone who is without allegiance to the soldiers of the Midianites can be part of the Israelite tribe.
@@koderamerikaner5147 It says kill all the men young or old. And "keep alive for yourselves" implies as slaves. Also right after, when they take account of the plunder they list 32000 women there among the cattle gold and treasures.
@@koderamerikaner5147 Congratulations! You have just justified genocide and sex slavery.
If only Young Sheldon could see this video
He isn't real
@@Zedreconno
Young Sheldon that is
@@Iesous_Christos_Nika_7 no what
@@Zedrecon Young Sheldon will be real in 52 minutes
Athiest reddit is alone enough for me to reject athiesm embrace christianity
That's the same as "all the 'christians' saying they make '47k a month with the help of some broker on whatsapp' alone were enough for me to reject christianity..
Or the videos that claim "God has sent you $3.9 billion! Open the video to receive" were alone to enough to reject christianity..
Reddit lol...
Atheism is the default position.
We know its the default position. Default because its the starting point from a lack of gained knowledge @lennonkelly-james2693
@@johnmcclane3747 There isn't any knowledge to be gained in regards to Christianity being the one true religion.
5:00 - One thing about the Christianity spreading through colonization.
The King of Congo, converted to Christianity and even changed his name to a Christian name after a group of 150 Portuguese went there preaching the Gospel. 200 years BEFORE any colonization effor from European nations.
Atheists just refuse to admit that the Christian message was so attactive to people. Because they think if they concede this, they are saying the message is true.
Naturally, colonization was founded on the knowledge provided by missionaries.
@@giantotter319 Faith, hope, and love are terrible ethical standards!
@@Thatoneguy-pu8ty Of course not, they can be fine. As long as they are based in actual ideology and philosophy and not just "god and book said so"
@@giantotter319What are you even attempting to say here? Speak plainly or not at all.
@@AB-sw4kb I don't think I will, I'm speaking about complex subjects and won't hinder myself for anyone's lack of comprehension
Bro my ancient world history teacher was talking about religion, and we had an assignment called “Islamic achievements” and half of the “Islamic” achievements were done by the Catholic Church 😭😭 like science and hospitals
nobody "does" science as an achievement, you seem to be pretty lost in this.
@@giantotter319 The only one lost here is you, he never said anything about anyone doing science for achievements, he said that for a school assignment he had to read up about modern innovations achieved by Islam, but half of the innovations we're done by the church. You call him lost yet you managed to completely misunderstand what the dude was trying to say all because of one word LMAO
@@AoMohammed Congratulation on repeating the same thing he wrote, guess that's only thing you all are good for. Point still stands. And as far as those christian innovations go, most in one way or another originated with greeks, muslims or jews. Christians just had a talent for codifying it. That was the case with math, healthcare, even cuisine.
@giantotter319 you have no idea what your talking about. Christianity invented modern science. Not the Greeks or the Muslims or any eastern cultures. Because Christianity gave many of the axioms and presupositions that are necessary for modern science to work.
Generations of historians and sociologists have discovered many ways in which Christians, Christian beliefs, and Christian institutions played crucial roles in fashioning the tenets, methods, and institutions of what in time became modern science. They found that some forms of Christianity provided the motivation to study nature systematically.[52]
- Noah J. Efron
@@giantotter319The three pre-conditions just discussed-the translations, the universities, and the theologian-natural philosophers-laid a foundation for the emergence of modern science because they provided an environment that was conducive to the study of science. . . . And without the support of the theologians and the Church, the medieval universities would have been unable to institute the science-logic-natural philosophy curriculum that began Western Europe’s long, uninterrupted involvement with scientific thought and problems Grant, The Foundations of Modern Science
Jesus Christ be praised
Always!!!
I mean I liked Santa Claus as a kid too but everyone's gotta grow up eventually
@@griffin9478All the pagans are mouthy until God raises up more dedicated pagans to hand your ass to you right before He comes to deal with you personally. Islam is riding high at one quarter of all people on earth and one quarter of all land and our governments have been giving them a free pass into our countries for a while at this point. Mouth off now before you hear the shahada slipping out from between your lips because its coming sooner than you will be able to accept and we both know you lack the constitution and the masculinity to speak thusly to them.
@@griffin9478which is why i can confidently say Jesus Christ is King and santa claus isnt. Because while no records of a red fat man flying around exist as real proof, we have plenty of the life of Jesus Christ, and his resurrection. However, we both know you didnt make this statement in good faith
@@griffin9478have your parents ever teaches you the concept of "respect" or is it just a myth
Christianity has improved the lives of every country it's been to. Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is Liberty.
Africa and India strongly disagree
@@samosadosa2409 Huh? In both those places Christian ministries have been giving a lot of aid lol.
@@donut9719 Through colonialism, hell yeah. Do you understand how that's wrong, or do you need to hear about the murdered native children in christian schools in canada?
@@giantotter319 Colonialism =/= Christian ministries. Those schools WERE ran by the Canadian colonial government.
@@giantotter319 Christ is not Christianity bro
It always kills me when I hear people say "Christians are just as violent as followers of the 7th-century prophet" and then they somehow try to compare a couple of sentences in Deuteronomy, and a few crusaders, with 1300 years of imperialism from the mideast and a huge percentage of that prophet's scriptures. And in current times, the only people I have ever seen politely knocking on doors with literature and kind persuasion are various self-proclaimed Christians (whether or not you want to grant Witnesses and/or LDSers that moniker).
Meh I've me plenty of Hindu Proselytisers.
Probably a difference though, is they usually want to sell you something at the same time.
You can't just ignore "a couple of verses in Deuteronomy" that urge genocide.
if someone tells you christianity caused the crusades( 3 milion deaths in almost 200 years) then tell them atheism caused ww2, stalins soviet union and maos regime( ~150 milion deaths in ~50 years)
Also, before crusades muslims did lots of cruel, evil things and so the crusades had to stop the evil
How did atheism cause WWII? Pretty sure WWII was caused by nationalism, fascism, militaristic jingoism, and the Treaty of Versailles. And antisemitism, sure. But atheism? Yeah, I don’t think atheism caused WWII.
Also correlation does not equal causation. Just because Mao and Stalin were atheists doesn’t mean atheism caused them to commit atrocities.
Also, even if I grant *everything* you say as true (I.e. atheism killed 150 million), this entire argument is a whataboutism fallacy. Instead of addressing the deaths caused by Christians, you don’t deny they did it and that it was wrong, you just say “well atheists are worse,” which doesn’t vindicate Christianity. That would be like, if I said “9/11 was bad,” and someone replied “hey less than 3000 died in 9/11 but six million died in the Holocaust, why are you criticizing Al Qaeda buddy the Nazis are worse.”
None of these dictatorships were motivated by atheism though.
How about a better idea, do not generalize every problem to the world to a Religion, be a good representative of God and view everything in full lens
@@caseycrowe3805 It's a bad argument yes. But to deny that the fruit of atheistic ideology "nationalism, fascism, militaristic jingoism" involved in a large amount of deaths in the 21st century is a failure to understand history and sociology. The fact is that atheism doesnt generate a worldview that ends with the overall benefit of mankind.
Just last day I was thought in a nursing Class that Christianity brought a dark Age in Nursing
😂
How did they come to that conclusion? Since they probably mean medieval times, Paul of Aegina and the Byzantine medical community would like to have a word. Just because they were working with theories(like the 4 Humors) that are outdated and completely absurd now doesn't mean it was a dark age
Where do they think the name of the Knights Hospitaller came from?
@@RabidLeech1 I assume its because they literally thought demons were possessing people during epileptic episodes rather than trying to figure out it was uncontrollable fires in the brains neurons.
@@nickhadknacks-z9qHow dare those backwards people not have access to time machines to be able to use EEG! Who cares that it wasn't invented until *checks notes* 1924(some research on electrical activity going back to the 1870s)?! That goes against this narrative I've built!
Science and christianity or theism period, are two beliefs that do not contradict each other. You can believe in both, and both come together perfectly
THANK YOU!!!!!
@@alfieingrouille1528 we evolved from monkeys
W theistic evolution
My big thing is I have never heard a compelling argument for physical Death existing before the fall
No, science and any religion are contradictory. Faith cannot coexist with rationality. What is not ultimately testable and repeatable is not science. A good scientist never says 'oh, this must be real!' but has to constantly look and see if things work to declare that what they have is a working theory. Any loyalty to any God is thus contradictory to how science works
When people told me that Rome released lions on criminals in the colosseum, they did not tell me the criminals were Christian’s.
One time, I was reading a history book in high school that erroneously stated that the Gospels were "..filled with contradictions". That's a false and very biased statement to make, and its totally unnecessary with regard to Jesus and the writings of his disciples.
One of worse myths is that Galileu was like the proto-atheist trying to save us from Dark Ages.
When when you read his works. He argues for Heliocentrism, was a better explanation to Joshua 10 in which God stopped the Sun to help Jews win the war.
He argued that the theory of Aristotles about the planets moving with disks didn’t make sense, in the light of this story.
Excellent point. Galileo was fighting against the 'science' of the time; based on pagan views which the church had imbibed.
Galileo was a devout Christian who Challenged the Church authority at the time. Why would anyone stupidly think that he was a proto atheist who oppose Jesus 😂
Another myth is that Christianity does not treat women well.
Salve Regina
Oh, and as of today, it’s her birthday as well! Happy birthday, Mother Mary!🥳
Christianity freed women by comparison to how they were treated under the paganisms of antique europe
@@nocsiou”better” does not mean “good”.
@@ColddirectorJust learn to be appreciative at this point.
Christianity was doing for things paganism wasn't in the most extreme misorgistic time.
@@user-Strong.Trinitarian Except Christian organizations consistently fight to hold back women’s rights right up to the modern day. This is like telling a plebeian to be grateful to the Roman Senate for overthrowing the monarchy to institute the republic when those same senators were weaponizing said republic to screw them over at every turn.
@@user-Strong.Trinitarian My reply got deleted. I said nothing even remotely edgy or TOS breaking. UA-cam’s management keeps getting worse by the fucking year.
To be clear it’s almost certainly not RZ’a fault, it’s UA-cam’s worthless automated content moderation. They’re likely using an LLM to filter comments, which is insane because it effectively means nobody even knows what the rules are and they’ll keep changing as the LLM intakes more data. I hate AI so much like you wouldn’t believe.
Was anyone else here home schooled? Probably the only time in my life when I got enough sleep.
Homeschooling sucks, especially went hyper conservatives do it
I wasn't home schooled but I have a feeling that high school is an attempt to adjust you to a sleep deprived 9-5 life
Even middle age peasants got more time off than we do now
@@reisen9235 Exactly. It's completely insane that we teach people how long they should sleep and then just make them wake up at 7am(at least in my school).
The anti-science one is particularly obnoxious. It’s been mostly pretty well debunked for decades now.
Any idea in the society is either alien or common sense.
Just look at Covid, the media went from Masks are God sent cure to Yeah the masks were useless and everybody knew this from the starts, it was just better than nothing.
People will keep repeating that Christianity is anti-science until someday they will say, of course Christianity isn’t anti-science. Nobody never claimed this
Actually science works better in christianity than in atheism
Its certainly more openminded bc we believe in heavens/hells/purgatory etc aka dimensions...
❤ in my mind anyhow
I’m curious why you think that. Do you think science was handed down to us by God Himself (directly or indirectly)? And if so, why didn’t He provide this earlier, in the Bible itself, like so many people expect?
@@ididntaskyouropinion Science is about what you can prove, not your fantasy world.
@@kevinkelly2162 science proved Jesus existed
@@ididntaskyouropinion How and when?
Remember: science is perfectly okay to study as a Christian. I have never seen anything wrong with studying God's creations and how they work. It's wonderful to work with science.
8 That christians are unskilled dancers.
that one isnt a myth
@@redeemedzoomer6053 Latino Catholics that know how to dance be like
@@redeemedzoomer6053 In Ohio, it is
@@redeemedzoomer6053Black Baptist churches would beg to differ
@@mandiocatostada3859 Ohio is a hoax
Public school is horrible.
Look your probably right in many ways. But how is this helping seriously. How is statement public school is horrible helpful or good in any way. I'm a Christian I am going to public. Every single public is different. If someone told you all x is bad you would totally disagree. Like I highly doubt you would say scab. if you want to change the systems don't sit on the sidelines
amen brother
Nah, only if you live in the US. In Europe it's fairly decent.
It's not a sin for a Christian family to carefully make use of public school, as long as they monitor what is being taught and they are ready to pull their kids out if necessary. But as/if society improves we will come to realize that educating kids is way outside of the government's job and the government's aptitude.
@@joaovidentedefine fairly decent though. What school are you using as the measurement to compare the European public schools?
The Book of Genesis is what inspired the Big Bang Theory btw.
@@nicanorfredricksbirdrealm228 Eh, maybe in part. But it seems to me that part is limited mostly to the fact that both have the universe beginning to exist.
Genesis doesn’t line up with Big Bang Theory at all. First of all, the theory says nothing about the beginning of the universe, only the universe in its current form.
Take another look at Genesis 1. The Earth is unformed, and there is a vast ocean. That’s not empty. It actually aligns with an ancient model of the Earth: A flat disk where the sky is water contained in a solid firmament and held up by pillars. This idea pops up in various other places, especially Job 38-39.
@@seanpierce9386the Bible does not support the flat earth theory. you are referencing Genesis 1, yet are ignoring the Bible saying that light was created first, which holds to the Big Bang theory and our modern understanding of electromagnetism, amongst the foundation of all universal constants that hold space, matter and time together.
Christians do not typically hold to a flat earth view of the world, simply because the Bible does not confirm a flat earth creation of the world. The Bible isn’t primarily a scientific text, but people weren’t as ignorant as we think they were, considering Babylon had access to calculus dating back to the construction of the tower of Babel.
@@oxideaitunim What we call the speed of light is a universal speed limit. Photons just happen to travel at that speed through a vacuum, and they slow down in a medium due to the properties of waves. We have no idea what particles were created first, but given that the physics of the early universe were completely different than our own, it cannot have been anything we would call light. You’re probably just using this fact as a memorized apologetic. I would encourage you to think about the problem yourself.
You can’t have it both ways. Is the Bible scientifically accurate or not? If it is, then everything should be totally accurate with no mistakes. If it’s not, then why would a God-inspired book contain only the understanding of the world available to the people who wrote it? This is especially relevant in Job, where God is specifically trying to display His unknowable greatness with no need to appear reasonable to the people at the time.
@@jdotoz No. The big bang theory is about the expansion of the Universe, not the origin of the Universe.
Went to public school and secular university... It's more common than not for people to believe all of these lies
I think these myths are so pervasive that I often hear it from non-believers when I mentioned that I'm a Christian (I live all the way in SE Asia). People would try to argue with me about the bible over some grounds that they themselves aren't sure about. But I think all Christians should be equipped and ready to confront these arguments (1 Peter 3:15) hence why theology is essential. Thank you for the video!
"Now go and smite Amalek and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass."
1 Samuel 15:3, KJ21
Can you help me make this a just command from God? It is the children part i have a problem with...
When you are reading the bible you need to read it with the cultural context. The meaning of the verse yiu sent is not the complete physical murder of the amalek ppls but the destruction of their cultureal identity. The verse is akin to more like how ppl today says i completely murdered the other team etc.
ua-cam.com/users/livebFkJmAKfq2o?si=5A0W5_X-7kbSwviP
@@thomb.1326 Leviticus 18 explains it. These people were disgusting and they condemned their children and their civilisations to destruction...much like our own culture is apparently aiming for.
@Rocky-ur9mn
1.Why is it so specific in that even the infants and cattle are to be destroyed?
2.Its the COMMAND from God to Samuel, (very clear from the text if it is not misstranslated, wich gives a rise to many other problems if so) NOT the actual action that happend, since Saul actually didnt follow through, he Spared the King and some of the better cattle to offerd to God.
THEN he gets confronted by the profet Samuel, who reprimanded him for sparing the cattle and the King, Samuel then Beheads the King, Saul abdicates and David becomes the new king and God regrets that he made Saul king.
I know that the Amalekites werent wiped out, they reappear later in the texts.
My problem is again with the COMMAND OF SLAUGHTER and the reprimand for not following through, or the claim of inerrancy of the texts themselves (Jesus own words)
I'll also add that a lot of Galileo's issue was that he was being kind of a jerk(still a lot of historical debate about whether this was intentional) by putting the Pope's objections, in a book he wrote in Italian(writing in the common language, rather than Latin was a very anti-establishment move at the time), in the mouth of a character named Simplicio, meaning buffoon, and that he refused to show his work and answer the Pope's theological concerns. This was also only about a decade or two after Martin Luther's 95 Theses so the Catholics were very paranoid about any challenges to their supposed authority at the time.
Galileo was twisting scripture to justify his belief, not because we Catholics were paranoid about authority. Also he was teaching his theory as fact while not having sufficent proof. Go to your local uni and teach some crack pot idea with NO PROOF and see how long you stay as a teacher.
He also claimed to be on firmer scientific ground than he was. Yes, he turned out to be mostly correct, but he didn't have enough evidence at the time.
It also didn't help Galileo's case that his model of planetary motion... didn't conform to the history of observations and could not make accurate predictions for the future. A lot of folks get wrapped up in the fact he was right about heliocentrism, but ignore the fact he was completely WRONG regarding orbits, Galileo believed orbits to be perfect circles.
As Kepler later figured out, orbits are NOT circles, they're elliptical, and that makes a MASSIVE difference when you start trying to use circle orbits to calculate the positions of planets.
Meanwhile, the model of the solar system in use at the time, a hybrid model that actually assumed the sun, moon and outer planets orbited Earth while the Inner planets orbited the sun, was actually MORE PREDICTIVE of planetary motion and BETTER FIT the historically recorded positional data.
In other words, Galileo was actually in many ways LESS scientific than the Catholic Church at the time, as he refused to consider other options even when his model did not fit observed data.
@@jdotoz No, he wasn't "mostly correct", his model was less predictive of planetary motion than either the full geocentric model complete with epicycles or the hybrid model that I mentioned.
The ONLY things his model got correct were the relative positions of the planets AND heliocentrism. But his model could not be taken, plugged in any date, and then accurately predict the location the planets would be in the night sky. Thus he was wrong about SIX OTHER aspects of his model (the orbits of the known planets at the time).
Last I checked getting that much of an assignment observably wrong was a failing grade. :P
@@peregry Compared to the mainstream model of the time I'd say it was pretty good.
referring to the thumbnail, my school got like 10x more liberal this year, last year it was pretty much not political at all, this year they had a whole ass 30 minute talk to not disrespect gender identity and sexual orientation and to be inclusive and shit, but they skimmed over racism in like 5 secs
Lol
both should be talked about
It’s political to not disrespect peoples gender identities?
@@Colddirector gender identity as a concept is political even
@@kaiserv1n Not actively disrespecting someones gender identity shouldn't be. That should be simple courtesy.
"Science is the study of God's creation" ❤✝️
Bro called me out for not doing homework lol 🤣
Not to mention, many scientists were not only Christians but owed their discoveries and inventions to Christianity and the Bible.
Matthew Fontaine Maury was a naval officer and the founder of oceanography. He discovered the currents of the ocean after reading Psalm 8 and dedicating his life to it. Such currents are used today for shipping routes, freight and oil distribution, and underwater cables.
"many scientists were not only Christians but owed their discoveries and inventions to Christianity and the Bible." I disagree that "many" scientist claimed that their faith allowed them to make scientific discoveries. Regardless you have only cited one example. can you cite 3 more so that your quantifying word "many" is true? thank you my friend.
I usually dumb it down for atheists but here's how it works in the Old Testament:
Israel: Help us!
God: Sure.
Israel in desert betrays God.
God spanks Israel then says: I barely saved you and you turn your backs on me? I'm gonna leave! "
Israel: Please don't, we're sorry.
God: Then worship me like you promised.
Israel: Can we have a King?
God: But I'm your King.
Israel: Please?
God: Sure. Here's a nice kid, David.
Later... Israel: Look at Baal, he looks nice. Let's worship him.
God: Not again.
God spanks Israel.
God: They are so forgetful, so I'll send them prophets to remind them.
Israel: We don't like these prophets, they keep saying bad things. Let's chase them away.
God spanks Israel again.
Israel says sorry.
God: I forgive you. So much so that I'll send you a Messiah.
Israel: Cool.
God: So stop chasing my prophets away.
Later... Israel betrays God and kills prophets.
God spanks Israel.
God: This is your last warning. Your punisment will last 400 years since I just can't get through to you. Come back when you are called.
Thus it was the reason why He was called the long-suffering, all-loving and forgiving God.
God Is The Greatest And Bless You All Amen ✝️♥️✝️♥️✝️♥️✝️
You will never see your loved ones again. Have fun believing in nothing 😂😂😂
@@griffin9478 Are You serious Believe a true will hear on your words?
@@griffin9478 The devil is deep in You, i pray for You!
The worst lie I was taught about Christianity is that we are all "friends." We are not friends.
Who is "we"?
@@marlon8095 The children of God, the people that are made in God's image, people who are in the same religion as you, people in the comments who are religious, people who The Lord gives visions to, people who The Lord gives missions to...etc.
I find it interesting that a public school is the thumbnail for this video because here in New Zealand public schools often have better values and beliefs than the 'Christian' private schools. Public schools here also tend to have a wider and diverse groups of people than private schools and so religion, while not taught, is often discussed among students. My public school in Christchurch has a very large student bible study that kids attend and religion is not mentioned in our science classes and our teachers allow us to hold our own beliefs.
Just my random thoughts, great video, keep up the good work RZ😊
you'd need for americans to care about the rest of the world for this to be relevant.
Chch is generally more conservative than the rest of the country. Public schools in Wellington, not so great.
@@vijilantVery true, a lot of kids in Chch are actually farmers who are boarding at a town school.
🤣🤣
Anyone who reads Daniel, Genesis or Revelation, knows God and Science go together.
And anyone with common sense and rational thought knows that God doesn't exist
@@griffin9478 So there was nothing then there was something then that something was stable enough to form but wasn't really that stable or something from nothing caused it to explode thus the big bang.
Genesis is very unscientific that many apologists try to act as if it's mistranslated not literal etc
@@kisstune don't get me wrong this guy is a dick but the earth was eternal and the big bang just changed it's form
Genesis1 takes its story from enoma elish which in both a god is splitting the water (which goddess Tiamat which is chaotic dragon with many heads) and those splitted parts become heaven & earth and bible refer to that dragon in (psalm74:13) and many other places by name leviathan ;it’s polytheistic story with many errors
Most Christians need to know that just wearing a cross necklace or just going to church doesn’t make you a Christian. Take control of your faith and build a relationship with Christ!
Russian foreign minister is Armenian
Классно.
But if you don’t follow Christ even after being Baptized, are you still Christian? The definition of Christian is a follower of Christ, so wouldn’t you not be a Christian?
What part of the Nicene Creed, would the Filioque be apart of that? Both Orthodoxy and Western Churches have different views and each redefine the Trinity.
bro always has to bring up the 20 highlighter girl
0:45 There is a really good video by a UA-camr known as InspiringPhilosophy on this called “Christianity's War Against Science Debunked!” if you want to learn more.
Inspiring philosophy is one of my favorite UA-camrs
I have officially drafted myself into the IP Mafia. Yes, he does a wonderful job.
Being colonized by Christian colonists and conquistadors was the best thing to happen in the western hemisphere since the first people got there. You can have a colony of Christians proselytizing or Aztecs brutally sacrificing 10,000 people to a demon and Caribs eating each other. The choice seems pretty clear.
And the crusades were about taking back territory that Muslims had conquered from Christians
The idea that Christianity questioned and opposed scientific progress was touted throughout my educational career. It's sad that people still think this is true. Most Universities have their roots in Christianity.
no bo polska to lewacki kraj, wbrew temu co niektórzy myślą
It’s undeniably true with young earth creationism. Evolution had and still has significant opposition on explicitly religious grounds.
@@Colddirector nope, the catholic church in spain was what funded Columbus' journey. They must have known the world wasn't flat to send someone around the world. Please do research
@@Colddirector Science started long before evolution came on the scene.
@@rebeccalindley153 okay? that doesn’t change my argument in the slightest
Christ is King ☦️🗿
Could you do video on Eastern Catholicism similarly you did with Lutheranism, Baptism, Catholicism, Orthodoxy please?
Why? Eastern Catholicism is just in between Catholicism and Orthodoxy. It’s got no unique features of its own
Eastern Catholicism is just Catholics who larp as Orthodox and they don't even do a good job, like they combine Eastern and western customs in some places so its just so weird
Eastern Catholicism is a rite within the Catholic Church
I dislike Eastern Catholicism for how it tends to be seen. Eastern Catholics portray it as this kind of "reasonable middle ground" between Catholicism and Orthodoxy, but then you realise many of their beliefs are heretical to Catholics and it drags the Catholics down by showing that they're willing to tolerate literal heresies for the sake of unity and having more groups in communion with the pope.
@@itapi697 I know.
Your best video in a while. Thank you!
For those interested...Truth:
1) Christianity includes science
2) Christianity spread because it's the only God created / human discovered Way of Life
3) Christianity unites, but imperfect humans (including dedicated spiritually immature Christians) oppress themselves and others
4) Christians temporarily go to the paradise component of current heaven (e.g. soul is saved) and everyone else temporarily goes to Hades. When the new heaven/earth is here, on Judgement Day, either each human's soul is redeemed and their spiritual body is united with God and others in the new heaven eternally, or the human's soul is destroyed and spiritual body is eternally separated from God in hell.
5) One of God's many types of perfection is teleios (constantly spiritually maturing), hence God from Old to New Testament.
6) There is one Truth. The rare "narrow is the path" spiritually maturing Christians are one with the Truth: God gives free will (there is no predestination), real baptism (e.g. establishing spiritual connection with God) naturally eventually happens after a human starts and grows a relationship with God, etc.
7) Christians have discovered more of God and His/our reality over time...but the Truth hasn't changed.
regarding the conquest, Ironically Islam is the one that got the title religion of peace
God called me out 11:35 😭
Same lmao
My school NEVER taught any of that stuff. Every teacher I have had as been Christian or just never touch religion at all, my science teacher is Catholic, my old history teacher spent a lesson all on B.C. and A.D. and how it does not stand for after death. And everyone who went to my school was Christian, I know only 2 kids who are atheist, and they don't even debate about it, they respect that people believe that God is real and is the Lord. My public school is one of the best, I hope you all have good ones too, and if you don't, make them good ones.
Good book on this: Dominion by Tom Holland. Answers a lot of these ridiculous things from a secular standpoint.
Luckily I never got these taught in public school. I guess British schools are superior
6:50 John Brown was kind of my gateway drug to conversion, I'm from where he was born and that motivated me to study him. The lyrics
"John Brown was John the Baptist of the Christ we are to see, Christ who of the bondsmen shall the liberator be, and soon throughout the sunny south the slaves will all be free, his soul is marching on- The conflict that he heralded, he looks on from Heaven to view, on the army of the Union with its flag red, white and blue, and Heaven shall ring with anthems over the deed they mean to do, his soul is marching on"
from the original "John Brown's Body" lyrics printed in The Tribune on December 16, 1861 made me weep. They still do most of the time.
One note regarding ending slavery without a big war in England - they didn’t have to use violence. Slavery, specially agricultural slavery, wasn’t deeply entrenched into the economy of half the country, unlike America.
W NEWTON, ATHEISM IS SENSELESS
Yes, atheism is senseless. However you who believes in the Flying Spaghetti Monster are sound of mind
@@outmywritemind1739
I don't just blindly believe Christianity. I have tried Islam, and Judaism. I have a good substantial knowledge of church history and i can easily explain all essentials of the Christian faith. I understand apologetics: the nine extrabiblical sources for Jesus that still coincide with the bible and how the bible is 99.5 identical to the original manuscript.
The world is not eternal, there's a creator and that's God. You who doesn't believe has not been predestined by God to believe and will be damned by your sinful nature.
Yes i also believe in Calvinism, God's absolute sovereignty. Trust me, i myself cannot have the faith but it was God who changed the disposition of my heart to believe in him. May I preserve in the faith he has given and the Good Lord who starts his work in me shall finish it, Amen.
I don't just blindly believe Christianity. I have tried Islam, and Judaism. I have a good substantial knowledge of church history and i can easily explain all essentials of the Christian faith. I understand apologetics: the nine extrabiblical sources for Jesus that still coincide with the bible and how the bible is 99.5 identical to the original manuscript.
I also believe in Calvinism- God's ABSOLUTE sovereignty that means that if you don't believe in God it's because he hasn't called you to his from outside time while in time it seems you have rejected him but it is an uno reverso card
🥱
Just so everyone knows.. the Catholics and protestants agreed a long time ago that both their understandings of what consitutes salavtion is legitante . Both agree the other is saved
Random question, what’s y’all’s favorite worship song? I’m Southern Baptist and mine is Gloria Patri.
He Reigns - Newsboys
Jesus keep me near the cross, old hymn
Im a Christian; but also a longical person.
One of the things people get wrong about Christianity or religion in general, is that if we belive in God, we cant be rational or logical beings. But that isnt true. God wants us to be logical beings. He wants us to think for ourselves. But when we use science and reson against Him; that's when it bbwcomes wrong.
How could one possibly use science and reason against an existing God?
I'm wondering
@@ichsehsanders there are lots of evidence that a world wide flood did not happen, there is no way humans were created just one day after ALL animals were created.
W Issac newton 2:29. Always knew he was the brightest mind.
I'm not saying you need to believe it, but I seriously recommend taking an actual deep research dive into young earth Creationism. It's not some anti-science movement. It's tens of thousands of Christian scientists in multiple scientific organizations applying as direct a scientific process as possible to confirm or deny their theories.
This whole video is about "debunking lies told about Christianity," yet less than 5 minutes in you reinforce one of the biggest lies about a very large number of Christians.
If you've never seen it, Hydroplate theory: ua-cam.com/video/4hhE6tzJR_c/v-deo.html
that contradicts science in many ways
@@Gr8Imres Can you explain the contradictions to me, or are you just parroting what you've been taught?
@@camerapasteurize7215 half lives, evolution, the entirety of the nebular hypothesis
@@Gr8Imres Mutation issues, genetic decay, irreducible complexity, apparent age, entropy, the entirety of the fossil record?
I'm sorry, I thought we were just randomly throwing out buzz words with no explanation.
Saying that Christianity did not contribute to slavery is disingenuous when the Bible condones it at numerous points and given how it took almost two milennia to end it, it seems far more the product of cultural change than a religious command to me
Well good thing how you feel isn't what actually happened
@@CoryW-h3q Regardless, the credit Christianity can take for ending slavery is at best limited when the text itself condones it at multiple points, and it took like a milennia and a half of Christian hegemony for its abolition to even be on the table.
@@Colddirector doesn't change reality. They put a stop through religious convictions
@@CoryW-h3q That doesn't exactly mean much when religious convictions inspire people to do horrible things as well. You can't have it both ways, if Christianity wants credit for the good things done in its name, it also deserves blame for the terrible things done in its name.
@@Colddirector well no because one is to the letter and the other is to man's Interpretation through their wicked hearts, not following the hermeneutics of the scriptures
11:32 rather than the test paper swap analogy, here's a better suggestion: imagine a poor villager woman who has nothing going on for her. Suddenly a prince decided to marry her. Now she's suddenly rich, because her name is added to everything he has.
Glad you're as insistent on the "Christianity is not anti-science" point as you are. Speaking as someone who is both Baptist in theology but also accepting of things like evolution, I often feel like I'm stuck in the middle of the Conflict Theory hitting me from both directions when I mention I'm not a YEC. My fellow conservative evangelicals tend to be YEC, although thankfully, nobody has called me a heretic, and often think I'm not being faithful to the text(Ignoring the many textual issues of YEC like the Tree of Life problem in Gen 3:22-24 that you've mentioned before and why the tree needed to be "guarded" if it was simply an obedience thing, or the question of how Day and Evening could exist and be 24-hour periods before the Sun and Moon were a thing, or how Adam and Eve had a frame of reference of death pre-Fall as shown in Gen 2:17 and 3:4, or why the animals needed to be "subdued" if everything was peaceful in the Animal Kingdom before the Fall, or how plants which are also living things could be food before death.) and atheists will think I'm inherently illogical for rationally coming back(I had almost completely lost my faith in college due to being confronted with secular biblical theory despite being at a Baptist college, along with things in my personal life) to the idea that God exists at all.
That idea that Christianity and mainstream science are incompatible is beyond frustrating. Even those YEC who are scientific about it like my pastor(who is a fantastic man of God btw, not attacking him or his faith here) reject mainstream science. Think we all need to have a bit more grace on that question and accept that it's an issue that strong, reasonable Christians, can disagree on.
Why do you believe in evolution? It can't be proven, and many scientists don't even believe it.
Not to sound dumb but what does YEC mean
@@AoMohammed YEC=young earth creationist. These are the people who take the 6 days in Genesis hyperliterally and believe in a 6,000 year old Earth.
I don't really see what the issue is with, or without, Young Earth. God could have made the Earth at any time and just added all the stuff to make it look like it existed for longer. In Minecraft there are fossils and villages that look like they've been there a long time but those didn't naturally form one day long ago, they were just created recently for the purpose of making the world look like it was old. It's like Last Thursdayism pretty much. If the earth was young but made to look old, we would have no way to prove it.
@@danksmemington362I don't necessarily have an issue with most YEC people. I disagree with them and do have issues with those who will go around claiming those like me are heretics and saying that any other view means you're not a serious Christian but not with YEC people in general(most of the people in my church family are YEC after all.) They are good, solid Christians, and I fully acknowledge and respect their faith and viewpoints.
Science actually bought me to Christ lol. As the father of quantum physics said (paraphrased): a gulp from the glass of science will make you an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass Jesus is waiting for you."
I am a Seventh-Day Adventist and we should get together sometime over Discord, Zoom etc. to exchange ideas. I welcome you to learn about our beliefs so you may present an accurate representation and can either refute or agree with. I am also interested in learning about your points, though I have seen many of your videos and like them for the most part. Thank you and may God bless.
I have more intelectual respect for you guys seven days Adventists then for other types of Protestant in the basis of consistency.
The believe that saints are alive in heaven and can intercede for you is as old as the believe that Sunday is the new Shabbat because of Jesus resurrection on Sunday.
And if such believes are wrong, the Sunday believe is worse than the Intercession Belief. But somehow Protestants only reject the intercession tradition, they agree with the Sunday tradition, I don’t understand why.
If the Catholic tradition are wrong. God will be more merciful towards people trying to talk to saints in heaven. Then to people changing the day of the Lord.
Let me guess your sda because your parents converted when you were young
@@Chance_Rice Yes, I was raised an SDA. So what? Does that mean I cannot do my own research? That I follow blindly without testing their claims against the Bible? Just because someone was raised a certain way does not me that they do not do their own research. If you can show me in the Bible where I am wrong I will recant everything. But if you cannot then the truth must be accepted.
@thesagerodel4485 it was a joke because that's how most ppl convert
0:45 also about the scientific contributions. Don’t forget the massive contributions by our fellow orthodox brothers in the Byzantine Empire, virtually all of their Byzantine scientists and philosophers were Greek yet they were also devout orthodox Christian who became monks and bishops. Byzantine Greece produced polymaths in the medieval period such as Isidore of Miletus, John Philoponus and Leo the mathematician. Greece 🇬🇷 is essential in Christian history and science
Its even common here in Philippines
I went to catholic schools throughout my life, and it just made me despise christianity even though it has taken me YEARS to deal with my traumas I'm finally starting to return to the faith not as a catholic though(YET)
no harm, we Catholics have a meme that Catholic Schools makes more atheists than Catholics
don't be a Catholic. Be Presbyterian :)
@@redeemedzoomer6053I'm leaning very Anglican ngl
my father is even on my Local Anglican church council.
@@PabloVelasco-hr3koWell that's exactly what happened to me
Intra-Christianity Myth: "Remember the sabbath and keep it holy", and other laws, were reversible at the whim of a few men in 325AD.
Nope that happened since the 1st century because of Jesus resurrection. Justin Martyr had written about celebrating Sunday as the Lord's day 200+ years before the council
@@user-Strong.Trinitarian Citation.
@@FelonyVideosLook into the way Messianic Jews treat the Sabbath, as they are the direct descendants of the Jewish Christians. They don't have one 'Sabbath', they practice TWO Sabbaths, the regular Jewish Sabbath, and the gathering of the Saints together with Gentiles (aka Sunday)
They even find Adventists doctrine a clear misunderstanding of Scripture, as they understood that under the Law of Grace, Jesus IS the Sabbath and its fulfillment, and they can rest anytime, but they have to obey the Torah still to win over their Jewish brethren, hence that solution.
Science is a way in which to observe and study God's work.
Gregor Mendel, the Father of modern genetics was a Catholic Priest.
Robert Boyle, who defined elements, compounds, and mixtures was an Anglican.
Francis Collins, invented positional cloning is an atheist turned Christian.
Now what about all the others, like jews and muslims
newton was an alchemist. Does that mean alchemy is a good thing? Einstein was a deadbeat father. Does that mean being a deadbeat father is a good thing?
@@stewystewymc3929 Christianity is a GOOD THING.
Christianity brought about your universities and has the biggest charity foundations
Earth store house of information Heaven store house of righteousness
1: This is more of a modern phenomenon, nowadays biblical inerrancy contravenes scientific consensus pretty significantly; most famously with Evolutionary Biology.
2: That position is an oversimplification at best, but you calling most of those rulers “secular” is also.
3: Public school taught me that oppressors used Christianity to justify their actions as their opponents did. This is as close as a historical opinion you can get to being fact. Really not sure what you’re on about.
4: Public school never taught me Christianity is like that. What.
5: Again, what? Y’all must have had some weird-ass teachers.
6: Public school does disproportionately focus on the differences, but they have a limited time window to explain the Protestant reformation and its consequences. So I’ll give them a pass. They’re not allowed to teach Theology for Theology’s sake anyway.
7: I was taught Nicaea helped standardize Christian beliefs more so than “change” it.
Tl;Dr reply;
😂😂😂😂 you are so full of shit
I sadly had to go back to public school after being homeschooled for 6 years.
Hey Zoomer, you should make a video debunking common misconceptions about the Puritans.
Open Communist Arthur Miller has the monopoly on defaming the Puritans, specifically with his propaganda The Crucible being taught by retarded English teachers everywhere. It's difficult to fathom that by contrast, pretty much everybody you ever ask will have no idea what a "Holodomor" is. The death toll difference is only about 10-11 million minus 23 or so. Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you modern mass education!
GLAD TO BE HOME SCHOOLED
I'm not, its not hard just to not believe the lies in public school.
Thank God I'm russian
BASED Russian Orthodox church: 🗿
CRINGE American Gay churches: 🤡
uhh... not sure if I would trade places with you tbh.
Well, I wanted to make a joke about instead of having bad public education you have no public education at all, but I looked it up and your public education is pretty good.
Stupid facts getting in the way of a good joke!
Slava russiya 🇮🇹☦️🇷🇺
1 one. Agreed that Christianity is generally not opposed to Science, but fundamental Christianity in the US does, but extremists are not the norm. 2nd to me is half truth. More in the sense of those "secular" leaders paved the way and to call them secular is a potential misnomer and a defensive Strawman. Again with third and my opinion. Almost all traditional religions were pro slavery due to societal pressure and economics. I do agree several major Chrisitan groups were involved in emancipation too. Fourth point you brought up is a mhth in Chrisitan Theology. 5th is nuanced but yes it is a myth. 6th was a myth I never believed, but again somewhat nuanced. Core message I never believed changed in Christianity.
just as a correction, Isaac Newton wasn´t christian. He believed in God but rejected the trinity
Heliocentrism was declared a heresy by the Catholic Church. Geocentrism was the dominant view and justified by a literal reading of several scriptures.
Heliocentrism was never declared as heresy by the Catholic Church. That is a lie perpetuated by Atheists.
Galileo was excommunicated because a certain bishop did not like the way he treated him in favor of another bishop (and this channel discussed it before). Galileo was put under house arrest UPON GALILEO'S OWN REQUEST under that same bishop who supported him to prevent him from dying under that other bishop's hand.
@@skybattler2624 no that is a fact.
@@NC-vz6ui what you said is a common Atheist lie. A simple study of Galileo's life just disproves this lie of yours, and the truth is much more dramatic.
Heliocentrism is NOT the reason why Galileo was excommunicated. Galileo was placed under house arrest upon his own request under a bishop who supported his work. That same bishop encouraged him to defend his position, form his confession of repentance (even if there is no need for that), and still explain his view of heliocentrism.
This is why hybrid theories exists that time, because Galileo's work is very hard to discredit.
@@NC-vz6ui Can you give me your source for your statement that it was declared heresy by the catholic church
?
@@Brutici There is a ton of resources on it. Just google it and it will present the Inquisitions report.
RZ, since you are a Minecraft youtuber, you should make a reaction to the trailer for the live action movie
Bruh, saying you shouldn't be Christian just because a few minor teachings today contradict older ones is like saying you shouldn't believe in science just because modern science teaches things people didn't used to believe.
The hell are you talking about? The derangement of even mentioning intellectual honesty while being religious is insulting enough, but then the arguments start.
Christianity has opposed science. You say that Copernicus wasn't questioned because they were opposed to scientific advancement or anything, except for the fact that they believed in a God in direct contradiction to the science and their belief in a God led to them actively discrediting science. They didn't give Copernicus scrutiny, they gave him defamation despite Copernicus being a devout Catholic. No "scientist" had any evidence for the Earth being the center of the Universe, their source was the Bible and the Bible only. The Church has directly opposed scientific advancement up until the modern day at any point where their scripture tells them to turn a blind eye to reason or logic.
Downplaying the "spread by conquest" claim misses the point of the claim. The point is that people were pressured into conversion through centuries of brainwashing. The Roman Empire used force to keep people united, and thus when Christianity became the official religion they were in a prime place to influence civilizations all across Europe and the Middle East. The Crusades were a direct response to Christians feeling threatened by some land no longer being occupied by Christians and the Pope thought that a good enough reason for them to die.
Christianity still contributes to oppression. People in their desperate search for intellectualism stumble into religion and then the rest of society has to help them walk down the long road of recovery back into a safe state of mental health. It also can't be denied that Christians were pro-slavery because the Bible directly condoned it. Saying "Christians started abolition" is the most insane and misleading thing I have ever heard. In the United States, it was the South who explicitly said they have every right to hold slaves as property because God constructed the natural order as a totem pole and put black people at the bottom. Confederate President Jefferson Davis said "It was established by decree of Almighty God … it is sanctioned in the Bible, in both Testaments, from Genesis to Revelations" in 1859. It was Quakers who started the first abolition movements, who were a sect of Christians that were persecuted by Presbyterians and Catholics for decrying God's will and speaking out against slavery.
Christianity doesn't say "good people go to heaven," thats correct. So why are you feigning praise for a deity that doesn't love or respect you?
You can say what you want about the Old Testament, after all it's a fictional book so it's all up to your interpretation anyway, but yeah the consensus at church and from our pastors has been that God is harsher (but surely so out of love) in the Old Testament. It's almost like the testaments were written by different people with little literary talent.
Yes, the Bible is up to your interpretation. The Bible is full of contradictions, and no Christians can agree. John 5:22 says God judges, John 12:47 says God does not judge. Luke 16:19 says Once a person dies there is no return from the grave, 1 Samuel 28:11 says Samuel returned from the grave. Romans 3:10 says There is no one that is sinless and Job 1:1 says Job was perfect and upright. You can further prove how little Christians truthfully adhere by the Bible by attending any American churches potluck dinners because there will be bacon and probably shrimp, both forbidden foods under Leviticus 11:7-10. The point is they claim the Bible is an absolute truth, and thats laughably untrue.
Who cares on the last one? The Council of Nicaea hegemonized Christianity and strengthened it; we may never know if Christianity still would have blossomed as it did without the Council of Nicaea, so it's pointless to argue alternate history. Sure. Christianity has been mostly the same the entire time, but if you want me to believe your book is an absolute truth, why would there ever been any need to update or clarify anything?
I hope that the next generation can be free from these conspiratorial vestiges you preach so society can begin building forward with love and understanding. Your book might have a lot to say about those values but so few adherents actually practice.
How did you come to those conclusions?
@@outmywritemind1739 The irony of your comment being massively intellectually dishonest. You didn't magically evolve from a magical exploding dot. Seek God.
Being one of the new generation currently finishing off year twelve I completly support what you have said after freeing myself from this conspiratorial garbage passed on to me by my parents and grandparents.
Go read Atheist Delusions by DBH. It is a 400+ page book dedicated to refuting the garbage you just spewed everywhere
@@markizkorobas4049 conspiratorial garbage? What made you say that?
Christianity does not hinder science. It was a dark age where most people are illiterate. Churches often become center of learning for monks and supository of ancient knowledge. The catholic church only crack down on scientific researcher after protestant reformation.
Is there a place where I can find your sources for this information?
His ass lmao
I asked him that a few months ago, but he did not respond.
It is not a Wikipedia article or scientific paper just a UA-cam video. Do your own research.
His source if everything he read in the past 5 years since he converted and got interested in Christianity.
Tell me one quote from the Video you find problematic and I’ll personally check the sources of the claim and bring it to you cause I agree and vouch for everything said in the video
@@Ordo1980 God forbid someone is called out for the information they spread online
I remember vividly in about 6th grade I believe. My teacher was teaching about Christianity, and when he got to Jesus he said that during that time period he got hung by a rope and not a cross, because cross crucifixions didn't exist in that time period. As a young Christian I was confused, but accepted it because school is always right, right? Wrong. I held onto that belief for years until I talked to my pastor and looked into it. It's much worse than we think.
Issac newton was a non trinitarian.
He was pretty fascinated with the occult.
i want to hear your oppinion about Nietzche's theories about christianity, could be a cool video
John Calvin literally defends YEC.
yes but he also says Christians should accept the findings of secular science and said Genesis is an oversimplified narrative
@@redeemedzoomer6053 You can't prove billions of years or evolution.
YEC is correct
@@andyontheinternet5777And you can't prove a four-figure year old universe from the physical evidence.
@@jdotoz That's correct. The idea of a young earth doesn't come from human conjecture, it comes from the Bible. God is more than capable of creating something that appears older than it is. Jesus did just that when he turned water into wine.
Thanks for this great video, it's been a blessing to me!
My only zoomer ❤️
Wow
RZ is taken, he's married
11:35 is one of the most curious sections about salvation.
I heard a sermon by a w tozer on this.
He said that heaven isnt full of Earth's garbage. He said that to truly embrace Christ is to truly change into a good person. Certainly we ARE only saved through our faith of our LORD, but surely God wouldnt just overlook say, a pedo's sins just because he says he praises Christ.
He would forgive him, but only if he was truly repentant.
Part of the glory of God is that everybody has an individual relationship with him.
Yay new vid.