Don't forget the myth that "satan rules hell". A lot of people believe that. No. Hell is the place where the devil and all his demons and those who are not written in the book of life will be punished for eternity.
Hell is a myth. Where in the bible does it say you will be punished for all eternity? That literally contradicts John 3:16. What it does say is that there will be a judgement. Eternal death.
Remember: science is perfectly okay to study as a Christian. I have never seen anything wrong with studying God's creations and how they work. It's wonderful to work with science.
Yeah, Science is cool, I believe that you cannot refutate scientific observations. As a christian it makes me sad people use earthly things to say God is not real
You sure? Scientists are far less religious than other people and the amount of people becoming scientists are fairly proportionate. Higher education causes people to become less religious and as a religious person yourself do you really think that's a good thing?
@PhillipMoore-td5yi I didn't say you were required to be a scientist as a Christian. I just said that it's okay to learn about how things work. The way you phrased that made me sound like Kim Jong Un by sending people off to the careers of my choice.
Most Christians need to know that just wearing a cross necklace or just going to church doesn’t make you a Christian. Take control of your faith and build a relationship with Christ!
What part of the Nicene Creed, would the Filioque be apart of that? Both Orthodoxy and Western Churches have different views and each redefine the Trinity.
I'm taking AP World History, and one of the first things my teacher said about Christianity was that Jesus never claimed to be the Messiah and that Christians argued this was due to his humility. I shared with him John 4:25-26 immediately after, and he said, "Oh, 'll look into it then." saying he studied world religions as an interest. Deception is causing misinformation. Please make sure we as Christians know the word so we can to tell the truth from a historical and spiritual standpoint. Jesus Christ needs the representative he deserves, albeit we can never fully and perfectly represent him, at least we can do our best by the Holy Spirit working mightily in us, giving us the desire to do his will.
@@weepingj While that's true, it's also a common apologetics story. In reality, an AP history teacher has no business bringing up these claims about Jesus, and if they do it as part of class, how is it they never herd the verse before?
@@kosefixUniverse from nothing, multiverses, primordial soup, billions of years, human evolution from apes, junk DNA are all examples of false science
Nowadays, unfortunately, the persecution of the first Christians is forgotten. I highly recommend the historical novel by the Polish Nobel Prize winner Henryk Sienkiewicz "Quo Vadis"
@@giantotter319, In the case of medieval works, what we currently know is interpreted based on ancient accounts (which have been preserved directly or indirectly), so I don't think they are lying much in this matter. "Quo Vadis" is not ahistorical. It is a historical NOVEL, so it was not written in those times (you can see from the author's last name), but Sienkiewicz really had a good historical workshop, and the novel reflects the spirit of those times
@@jakubkosz1009 There is plenty of ancient sources which were preserved through greeks or muslims. Christian authors have changed some of the narratives, though - namely the persecution of christians. For example the idea that Nero was insane and hated does not fit the way he was described at his time - he was bad at running rome and spent a lot of time on nonsense, but compared to many emperors he was almost capable. Also pretty popular in eastern part of the empire. Also Ogniem i Meczem is better.
Yes, I have read and re-read this novel from my teen years. I grew up in West Germany after WWII. My father was in the USAF and a "history nerd". We lived near Trier and often visited the Roman ruins and my father told my sister and I about how the Roman's "threw" Christians to the lions and other wild animals in the amphitheater. This book helped make me a more devout Christian. I have an original edition.
@@jilledmondson6894, as a Pole and Catholic I'm glad you liked it :) I am at my 22s and I just discovered this for myself (but generally in my country it is widely known). I saw that this reading allowed me to better understand my faith too (its sources, my behavior as a non-believer who is undergoing transformation, etc.). Greetings :)
It always kills me when I hear people say "Christians are just as violent as followers of the 7th-century prophet" and then they somehow try to compare a couple of sentences in Deuteronomy, and a few crusaders, with 1300 years of imperialism from the mideast and a huge percentage of that prophet's scriptures. And in current times, the only people I have ever seen politely knocking on doors with literature and kind persuasion are various self-proclaimed Christians (whether or not you want to grant Witnesses and/or LDSers that moniker).
Good people do go to heaven but not because they earned it. Be careful how you word things like this especially around children and non-believers. You will confuse people.
@@aaronharlow2137 So no one is good. All the infants god killed in the flood? All evil. The 1000+ infants that die every day. All evil? All deserving of hell? Any religion that teaches you all kids are worthless wretches worthy of eternal torture is vile. Any God that tricks you into being born owing him worship or else be evicted into hell is a horrible being and even worse landlord. Only by indoctrination of children or preying on the poor, drug addicted, and desperate, only through war, colonization, and threat of punishment are you able to coerce people into believing this nonsense. I have no problem letting my kid read any religious book including the Bible because I didn't indoctrinate them by saying there is only 1 truth and I'm the one that discovered it. All contradictions are false. I teach them to think critically and evaluate what they see and read. If Christians did this the religion would be dead in a decade, not counting the already indoctrinated.
@Ask_Xi It doesn't say young girls, but women and children (as separate nouns). And, where does it say to make them into slaves? If you interpret in a modern English context a translation of the Hebrew, then you can abstract it enough to metaphorically mean keep alive as in keep servants for yourself, but a charitable reading or just the actual Hebrew says to cause them to live amongst you. It's not enslaving them, it never says that anywhere in the text in Numbers 31, it's telling them to adopt them into the tribes of Israel. They killed everyone who was married, probably because you hold an allegiance to those you're married to (God considers the married as becoming One), but someone who is without allegiance to the soldiers of the Midianites can be part of the Israelite tribe.
@Ask_Xi Numbers 18 clearly outlines the disgusting sexual deviancy of the surrounding pagan nations, the same kind of deviancy we now see becoming normalised in our own society now that it has opted to return to paganism. And here you are, running to the defence of those people and their deviancy...
After reading the Bible myself, I discovered that Jesus Christ is life Himself. Life is ultimately meaningless without God and I am glad that the Lord showed me and many others His mercy.
@@griffin9478 At least I’ll have lived a moral life and done objective good. So yes, I will sleep well. My question for you is, since God is real, where will you spend eternity?
@@johnmcclane3747 The Bible is a book of fables and half-truths. It's for bad people who need to be mentally chained to stop them from doing bad things. Usually doesn't help though.
Bro my ancient world history teacher was talking about religion, and we had an assignment called “Islamic achievements” and half of the “Islamic” achievements were done by the Catholic Church 😭😭 like science and hospitals
@@giantotter319 The only one lost here is you, he never said anything about anyone doing science for achievements, he said that for a school assignment he had to read up about modern innovations achieved by Islam, but half of the innovations we're done by the church. You call him lost yet you managed to completely misunderstand what the dude was trying to say all because of one word LMAO
@@AoMohammed Congratulation on repeating the same thing he wrote, guess that's only thing you all are good for. Point still stands. And as far as those christian innovations go, most in one way or another originated with greeks, muslims or jews. Christians just had a talent for codifying it. That was the case with math, healthcare, even cuisine.
@giantotter319 you have no idea what your talking about. Christianity invented modern science. Not the Greeks or the Muslims or any eastern cultures. Because Christianity gave many of the axioms and presupositions that are necessary for modern science to work. Generations of historians and sociologists have discovered many ways in which Christians, Christian beliefs, and Christian institutions played crucial roles in fashioning the tenets, methods, and institutions of what in time became modern science. They found that some forms of Christianity provided the motivation to study nature systematically.[52] - Noah J. Efron
@@giantotter319The three pre-conditions just discussed-the translations, the universities, and the theologian-natural philosophers-laid a foundation for the emergence of modern science because they provided an environment that was conducive to the study of science. . . . And without the support of the theologians and the Church, the medieval universities would have been unable to institute the science-logic-natural philosophy curriculum that began Western Europe’s long, uninterrupted involvement with scientific thought and problems Grant, The Foundations of Modern Science
"I'm not arguing for Christianity in this video, I'm just arguing for the objective historical facts" That's called arguing for Christianity. Christ is king ✝ EDIT: Fun fact, the Islamic Golden Age was about 1% Islam and 99% the Persians.
if someone tells you christianity caused the crusades( 3 milion deaths in almost 200 years) then tell them atheism caused ww2, stalins soviet union and maos regime( ~150 milion deaths in ~50 years)
How did atheism cause WWII? Pretty sure WWII was caused by nationalism, fascism, militaristic jingoism, and the Treaty of Versailles. And antisemitism, sure. But atheism? Yeah, I don’t think atheism caused WWII. Also correlation does not equal causation. Just because Mao and Stalin were atheists doesn’t mean atheism caused them to commit atrocities. Also, even if I grant *everything* you say as true (I.e. atheism killed 150 million), this entire argument is a whataboutism fallacy. Instead of addressing the deaths caused by Christians, you don’t deny they did it and that it was wrong, you just say “well atheists are worse,” which doesn’t vindicate Christianity. That would be like, if I said “9/11 was bad,” and someone replied “hey less than 3000 died in 9/11 but six million died in the Holocaust, why are you criticizing Al Qaeda buddy the Nazis are worse.”
@@caseycrowe3805 It's a bad argument yes. But to deny that the fruit of atheistic ideology "nationalism, fascism, militaristic jingoism" involved in a large amount of deaths in the 21st century is a failure to understand history and sociology. The fact is that atheism doesnt generate a worldview that ends with the overall benefit of mankind.
@@caseycrowe3805Not whataboutism. No one is denying that pretty much any belief can cause atrocities to occur. It's just that we hear time and time again about Christianity yet there is clear evidence atheism and other, non-religious ideologies have caused atrocities as well. We're simply pointing out that it's not correct to say atheism because no war, because that's simply not true. Just because you don't like bringing it up doesn't mean calling attention to it is wrong.
I think these myths are so pervasive that I often hear it from non-believers when I mentioned that I'm a Christian (I live all the way in SE Asia). People would try to argue with me about the bible over some grounds that they themselves aren't sure about. But I think all Christians should be equipped and ready to confront these arguments (1 Peter 3:15) hence why theology is essential. Thank you for the video!
"Now go and smite Amalek and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass." 1 Samuel 15:3, KJ21 Can you help me make this a just command from God? It is the children part i have a problem with...
When you are reading the bible you need to read it with the cultural context. The meaning of the verse yiu sent is not the complete physical murder of the amalek ppls but the destruction of their cultureal identity. The verse is akin to more like how ppl today says i completely murdered the other team etc.
@@thomb.1326 Leviticus 18 explains it. These people were disgusting and they condemned their children and their civilisations to destruction...much like our own culture is apparently aiming for.
@Rocky-ur9mn 1.Why is it so specific in that even the infants and cattle are to be destroyed? 2.Its the COMMAND from God to Samuel, (very clear from the text if it is not misstranslated, wich gives a rise to many other problems if so) NOT the actual action that happend, since Saul actually didnt follow through, he Spared the King and some of the better cattle to offerd to God. THEN he gets confronted by the profet Samuel, who reprimanded him for sparing the cattle and the King, Samuel then Beheads the King, Saul abdicates and David becomes the new king and God regrets that he made Saul king. I know that the Amalekites werent wiped out, they reappear later in the texts. My problem is again with the COMMAND OF SLAUGHTER and the reprimand for not following through, or the claim of inerrancy of the texts themselves (Jesus own words)
How did they come to that conclusion? Since they probably mean medieval times, Paul of Aegina and the Byzantine medical community would like to have a word. Just because they were working with theories(like the 4 Humors) that are outdated and completely absurd now doesn't mean it was a dark age
@@RabidLeech1 I assume its because they literally thought demons were possessing people during epileptic episodes rather than trying to figure out it was uncontrollable fires in the brains neurons.
@@nickhadknacks-z9qHow dare those backwards people not have access to time machines to be able to use EEG! Who cares that it wasn't invented until *checks notes* 1924(some research on electrical activity going back to the 1870s)?! That goes against this narrative I've built!
@@nicanorfredricksbirdrealm228 Eh, maybe in part. But it seems to me that part is limited mostly to the fact that both have the universe beginning to exist.
Genesis doesn’t line up with Big Bang Theory at all. First of all, the theory says nothing about the beginning of the universe, only the universe in its current form. Take another look at Genesis 1. The Earth is unformed, and there is a vast ocean. That’s not empty. It actually aligns with an ancient model of the Earth: A flat disk where the sky is water contained in a solid firmament and held up by pillars. This idea pops up in various other places, especially Job 38-39.
@@seanpierce9386the Bible does not support the flat earth theory. you are referencing Genesis 1, yet are ignoring the Bible saying that light was created first, which holds to the Big Bang theory and our modern understanding of electromagnetism, amongst the foundation of all universal constants that hold space, matter and time together. Christians do not typically hold to a flat earth view of the world, simply because the Bible does not confirm a flat earth creation of the world. The Bible isn’t primarily a scientific text, but people weren’t as ignorant as we think they were, considering Babylon had access to calculus dating back to the construction of the tower of Babel.
@@oxideaitunim What we call the speed of light is a universal speed limit. Photons just happen to travel at that speed through a vacuum, and they slow down in a medium due to the properties of waves. We have no idea what particles were created first, but given that the physics of the early universe were completely different than our own, it cannot have been anything we would call light. You’re probably just using this fact as a memorized apologetic. I would encourage you to think about the problem yourself. You can’t have it both ways. Is the Bible scientifically accurate or not? If it is, then everything should be totally accurate with no mistakes. If it’s not, then why would a God-inspired book contain only the understanding of the world available to the people who wrote it? This is especially relevant in Job, where God is specifically trying to display His unknowable greatness with no need to appear reasonable to the people at the time.
One time, I was reading a history book in high school that erroneously stated that the Gospels were "..filled with contradictions". That's a false and very biased statement to make, and its totally unnecessary with regard to Jesus and the writings of his disciples.
@@Dcm193 no its really not, and I never said it has zero contradictions. I was trying to say that a more neutral statement or position should have been in the textbook. Also read Hegel, contradiction actually creates new knowledge through the dialectical process.
0:45 There is a really good video by a UA-camr known as InspiringPhilosophy on this called “Christianity's War Against Science Debunked!” if you want to learn more.
@@griffin9478All the pagans are mouthy until God raises up more dedicated pagans to hand your ass to you right before He comes to deal with you personally. Islam is riding high at one quarter of all people on earth and one quarter of all land and our governments have been giving them a free pass into our countries for a while at this point. Mouth off now before you hear the shahada slipping out from between your lips because its coming sooner than you will be able to accept and we both know you lack the constitution and the masculinity to speak thusly to them.
@@griffin9478which is why i can confidently say Jesus Christ is King and santa claus isnt. Because while no records of a red fat man flying around exist as real proof, we have plenty of the life of Jesus Christ, and his resurrection. However, we both know you didnt make this statement in good faith
Science and christianity or theism period, are two beliefs that do not contradict each other. You can believe in both, and both come together perfectly
No, science and any religion are contradictory. Faith cannot coexist with rationality. What is not ultimately testable and repeatable is not science. A good scientist never says 'oh, this must be real!' but has to constantly look and see if things work to declare that what they have is a working theory. Any loyalty to any God is thus contradictory to how science works
referring to the thumbnail, my school got like 10x more liberal this year, last year it was pretty much not political at all, this year they had a whole ass 30 minute talk to not disrespect gender identity and sexual orientation and to be inclusive and shit, but they skimmed over racism in like 5 secs
How do you think people heard about Christianity? Do you think people back then had flyers raining down from the sky, preaching about God and His Prophets? Yes, Islam spread by conquest. Yes, Christianity also spread by conquest.
7:34 early church fathers weren’t the only early anti slavery Christian’s. There was also Moses himself freeing the lord’s people from Egyptian slavery so he could lead them to their designated holy land
I'll also add that a lot of Galileo's issue was that he was being kind of a jerk(still a lot of historical debate about whether this was intentional) by putting the Pope's objections, in a book he wrote in Italian(writing in the common language, rather than Latin was a very anti-establishment move at the time), in the mouth of a character named Simplicio, meaning buffoon, and that he refused to show his work and answer the Pope's theological concerns. This was also only about a decade or two after Martin Luther's 95 Theses so the Catholics were very paranoid about any challenges to their supposed authority at the time.
Galileo was twisting scripture to justify his belief, not because we Catholics were paranoid about authority. Also he was teaching his theory as fact while not having sufficent proof. Go to your local uni and teach some crack pot idea with NO PROOF and see how long you stay as a teacher.
He also claimed to be on firmer scientific ground than he was. Yes, he turned out to be mostly correct, but he didn't have enough evidence at the time.
It also didn't help Galileo's case that his model of planetary motion... didn't conform to the history of observations and could not make accurate predictions for the future. A lot of folks get wrapped up in the fact he was right about heliocentrism, but ignore the fact he was completely WRONG regarding orbits, Galileo believed orbits to be perfect circles. As Kepler later figured out, orbits are NOT circles, they're elliptical, and that makes a MASSIVE difference when you start trying to use circle orbits to calculate the positions of planets. Meanwhile, the model of the solar system in use at the time, a hybrid model that actually assumed the sun, moon and outer planets orbited Earth while the Inner planets orbited the sun, was actually MORE PREDICTIVE of planetary motion and BETTER FIT the historically recorded positional data. In other words, Galileo was actually in many ways LESS scientific than the Catholic Church at the time, as he refused to consider other options even when his model did not fit observed data.
@@jdotoz No, he wasn't "mostly correct", his model was less predictive of planetary motion than either the full geocentric model complete with epicycles or the hybrid model that I mentioned. The ONLY things his model got correct were the relative positions of the planets AND heliocentrism. But his model could not be taken, plugged in any date, and then accurately predict the location the planets would be in the night sky. Thus he was wrong about SIX OTHER aspects of his model (the orbits of the known planets at the time). Last I checked getting that much of an assignment observably wrong was a failing grade. :P
I wasn't home schooled but I have a feeling that high school is an attempt to adjust you to a sleep deprived 9-5 life Even middle age peasants got more time off than we do now
@@reisen9235 Exactly. It's completely insane that we teach people how long they should sleep and then just make them wake up at 7am(at least in my school).
As an atheist, this video has basically been exactly what I've been looking for. There are so many disrespectful atheists and theists whose arguments are as weak as they possibly can be and have no understanding of the other side of the argument. Another myth that you might want to talk about is the myth that Jesus didn't exist. I see so many atheists saying Jesus didn't exist, but he has more evidence of existing than Julius Caesar (I believe he existed but does not have heavenly connection).
The only thing that any Christian should say regarding slavery is that Christian nations ENDED IT. Not just within themselves. The entire Muslim world gave up on slavery because of Christian nations warships parked in front of their coast.
@@donut9719 Through colonialism, hell yeah. Do you understand how that's wrong, or do you need to hear about the murdered native children in christian schools in canada?
I usually dumb it down for atheists but here's how it works in the Old Testament: Israel: Help us! God: Sure. Israel in desert betrays God. God spanks Israel then says: I barely saved you and you turn your backs on me? I'm gonna leave! " Israel: Please don't, we're sorry. God: Then worship me like you promised. Israel: Can we have a King? God: But I'm your King. Israel: Please? God: Sure. Here's a nice kid, David. Later... Israel: Look at Baal, he looks nice. Let's worship him. God: Not again. God spanks Israel. God: They are so forgetful, so I'll send them prophets to remind them. Israel: We don't like these prophets, they keep saying bad things. Let's chase them away. God spanks Israel again. Israel says sorry. God: I forgive you. So much so that I'll send you a Messiah. Israel: Cool. God: So stop chasing my prophets away. Later... Israel betrays God and kills prophets. God spanks Israel. God: This is your last warning. Your punisment will last 400 years since I just can't get through to you. Come back when you are called. Thus it was the reason why He was called the long-suffering, all-loving and forgiving God.
5:02 I want to add a point on the conquest part. The reason why the crusades happened was because of the culture which influenced the European countries at that time. Some of the European nations, particularly the Anglo Saxons, based their societies on pride and honour. So when the gospel was preached to them, they could not understand the basis of the message so they twisted it to suit their beliefs. Since they thought that it was shameful for Jerusalem to be captured by the Muslims, they thought it was honourable for them to recapture in the name of the Lord. When in actuality, it was based on their pride. So that’s why the subsequent crusades weren’t as successful compared to the first one, as they are not moving in the will of God
I’m curious why you think that. Do you think science was handed down to us by God Himself (directly or indirectly)? And if so, why didn’t He provide this earlier, in the Bible itself, like so many people expect?
Its mainly to do with the history of the churches being against anything science related. Like the invention of the lightning rod, evolution,big bang cosmology etc
@@marlon8095 The children of God, the people that are made in God's image, people who are in the same religion as you, people in the comments who are religious, people who The Lord gives visions to, people who The Lord gives missions to...etc.
0:45 also about the scientific contributions. Don’t forget the massive contributions by our fellow orthodox brothers in the Byzantine Empire, virtually all of their Byzantine scientists and philosophers were Greek yet they were also devout orthodox Christian who became monks and bishops. Byzantine Greece produced polymaths in the medieval period such as Isidore of Miletus, John Philoponus and Leo the mathematician. Greece 🇬🇷 is essential in Christian history and science
@@griffin9478 So there was nothing then there was something then that something was stable enough to form but wasn't really that stable or something from nothing caused it to explode thus the big bang.
Genesis1 takes its story from enoma elish which in both a god is splitting the water (which goddess Tiamat which is chaotic dragon with many heads) and those splitted parts become heaven & earth and bible refer to that dragon in (psalm74:13) and many other places by name leviathan ;it’s polytheistic story with many errors
For those interested...Truth: 1) Christianity includes science 2) Christianity spread because it's the only God created / human discovered Way of Life 3) Christianity unites, but imperfect humans (including dedicated spiritually immature Christians) oppress themselves and others 4) Christians temporarily go to the paradise component of current heaven (e.g. soul is saved) and everyone else temporarily goes to Hades. When the new heaven/earth is here, on Judgement Day, either each human's soul is redeemed and their spiritual body is united with God and others in the new heaven eternally, or the human's soul is destroyed and spiritual body is eternally separated from God in hell. 5) One of God's many types of perfection is teleios (constantly spiritually maturing), hence God from Old to New Testament. 6) There is one Truth. The rare "narrow is the path" spiritually maturing Christians are one with the Truth: God gives free will (there is no predestination), real baptism (e.g. establishing spiritual connection with God) naturally eventually happens after a human starts and grows a relationship with God, etc. 7) Christians have discovered more of God and His/our reality over time...but the Truth hasn't changed.
Look your probably right in many ways. But how is this helping seriously. How is statement public school is horrible helpful or good in any way. I'm a Christian I am going to public. Every single public is different. If someone told you all x is bad you would totally disagree. Like I highly doubt you would say scab. if you want to change the systems don't sit on the sidelines
It's not a sin for a Christian family to carefully make use of public school, as long as they monitor what is being taught and they are ready to pull their kids out if necessary. But as/if society improves we will come to realize that educating kids is way outside of the government's job and the government's aptitude.
Another myth is that Christianity does not treat women well. Salve Regina Oh, and as of today, it’s her birthday as well! Happy birthday, Mother Mary!🥳
@@user-Strong.Trinitarian Except Christian organizations consistently fight to hold back women’s rights right up to the modern day. This is like telling a plebeian to be grateful to the Roman Senate for overthrowing the monarchy to institute the republic when those same senators were weaponizing said republic to screw them over at every turn.
@@user-Strong.Trinitarian My reply got deleted. I said nothing even remotely edgy or TOS breaking. UA-cam’s management keeps getting worse by the fucking year. To be clear it’s almost certainly not RZ’a fault, it’s UA-cam’s worthless automated content moderation. They’re likely using an LLM to filter comments, which is insane because it effectively means nobody even knows what the rules are and they’ll keep changing as the LLM intakes more data. I hate AI so much like you wouldn’t believe.
@@outmywritemind1739 I don't just blindly believe Christianity. I have tried Islam, and Judaism. I have a good substantial knowledge of church history and i can easily explain all essentials of the Christian faith. I understand apologetics: the nine extrabiblical sources for Jesus that still coincide with the bible and how the bible is 99.5 identical to the original manuscript. The world is not eternal, there's a creator and that's God. You who doesn't believe has not been predestined by God to believe and will be damned by your sinful nature. Yes i also believe in Calvinism, God's absolute sovereignty. Trust me, i myself cannot have the faith but it was God who changed the disposition of my heart to believe in him. May I preserve in the faith he has given and the Good Lord who starts his work in me shall finish it, Amen.
I don't just blindly believe Christianity. I have tried Islam, and Judaism. I have a good substantial knowledge of church history and i can easily explain all essentials of the Christian faith. I understand apologetics: the nine extrabiblical sources for Jesus that still coincide with the bible and how the bible is 99.5 identical to the original manuscript. I also believe in Calvinism- God's ABSOLUTE sovereignty that means that if you don't believe in God it's because he hasn't called you to his from outside time while in time it seems you have rejected him but it is an uno reverso card 🥱
6:50 John Brown was kind of my gateway drug to conversion, I'm from where he was born and that motivated me to study him. The lyrics "John Brown was John the Baptist of the Christ we are to see, Christ who of the bondsmen shall the liberator be, and soon throughout the sunny south the slaves will all be free, his soul is marching on- The conflict that he heralded, he looks on from Heaven to view, on the army of the Union with its flag red, white and blue, and Heaven shall ring with anthems over the deed they mean to do, his soul is marching on" from the original "John Brown's Body" lyrics printed in The Tribune on December 16, 1861 made me weep. They still do most of the time.
Eastern Catholicism is just Catholics who larp as Orthodox and they don't even do a good job, like they combine Eastern and western customs in some places so its just so weird
I dislike Eastern Catholicism for how it tends to be seen. Eastern Catholics portray it as this kind of "reasonable middle ground" between Catholicism and Orthodoxy, but then you realise many of their beliefs are heretical to Catholics and it drags the Catholics down by showing that they're willing to tolerate literal heresies for the sake of unity and having more groups in communion with the pope.
Glad you're as insistent on the "Christianity is not anti-science" point as you are. Speaking as someone who is both Baptist in theology but also accepting of things like evolution, I often feel like I'm stuck in the middle of the Conflict Theory hitting me from both directions when I mention I'm not a YEC. My fellow conservative evangelicals tend to be YEC, although thankfully, nobody has called me a heretic, and often think I'm not being faithful to the text(Ignoring the many textual issues of YEC like the Tree of Life problem in Gen 3:22-24 that you've mentioned before and why the tree needed to be "guarded" if it was simply an obedience thing, or the question of how Day and Evening could exist and be 24-hour periods before the Sun and Moon were a thing, or how Adam and Eve had a frame of reference of death pre-Fall as shown in Gen 2:17 and 3:4, or why the animals needed to be "subdued" if everything was peaceful in the Animal Kingdom before the Fall, or how plants which are also living things could be food before death.) and atheists will think I'm inherently illogical for rationally coming back(I had almost completely lost my faith in college due to being confronted with secular biblical theory despite being at a Baptist college, along with things in my personal life) to the idea that God exists at all. That idea that Christianity and mainstream science are incompatible is beyond frustrating. Even those YEC who are scientific about it like my pastor(who is a fantastic man of God btw, not attacking him or his faith here) reject mainstream science. Think we all need to have a bit more grace on that question and accept that it's an issue that strong, reasonable Christians, can disagree on.
@@bigfennecI don't necessarily have an issue with most YEC people. I disagree with them and do have issues with those who will go around claiming those like me are heretics and saying that any other view means you're not a serious Christian but not with YEC people in general(most of the people in my church family are YEC after all.) They are good, solid Christians, and I fully acknowledge and respect their faith and viewpoints.
@@HistoryNerd808 the problem is there there is literally a verse in gensis that defines what one day is. "God called the light “day” and the darkness “night.” And evening passed and morning came, marking the first day." so one day in genesis has a morning evening and night. and if we say, one day in genesis is 1000 years maybe, that would mean 333 days were just straight sunshine, and 333 years had straight darkness.
My school NEVER taught any of that stuff. Every teacher I have had as been Christian or just never touch religion at all, my science teacher is Catholic, my old history teacher spent a lesson all on B.C. and A.D. and how it does not stand for after death. And everyone who went to my school was Christian, I know only 2 kids who are atheist, and they don't even debate about it, they respect that people believe that God is real and is the Lord. My public school is one of the best, I hope you all have good ones too, and if you don't, make them good ones.
Bruh, saying you shouldn't be Christian just because a few minor teachings today contradict older ones is like saying you shouldn't believe in science just because modern science teaches things people didn't used to believe.
Not to mention, many scientists were not only Christians but owed their discoveries and inventions to Christianity and the Bible. Matthew Fontaine Maury was a naval officer and the founder of oceanography. He discovered the currents of the ocean after reading Psalm 8 and dedicating his life to it. Such currents are used today for shipping routes, freight and oil distribution, and underwater cables.
"many scientists were not only Christians but owed their discoveries and inventions to Christianity and the Bible." I disagree that "many" scientist claimed that their faith allowed them to make scientific discoveries. Regardless you have only cited one example. can you cite 3 more so that your quantifying word "many" is true? thank you my friend.
@@robertm3329 Thank you for the response my friend. So how do these people prove that god exists? How are they any different from other believers? Can you now offer proof for gods existence? Thank you.
If an infinite Lord with infinite power, infinite knowledge, infinite understanding and infinite compassion somehow cannot by our standards exist, how can we?
I dont rember who said it, but it was something in the line of "Those who decide what kids learn in school are those who will manipulate the next generation and beyond." He/She was very, very real with that.
Massive oversimplification. Should we have allowed 1930s Germany to overtake Britain without a fight? If we don't fight no one dies. It's just a peace of land afterall.
Im a Christian; but also a longical person. One of the things people get wrong about Christianity or religion in general, is that if we belive in God, we cant be rational or logical beings. But that isnt true. God wants us to be logical beings. He wants us to think for ourselves. But when we use science and reson against Him; that's when it bbwcomes wrong.
@@ichsehsanders there are lots of evidence that a world wide flood did not happen, there is no way humans were created just one day after ALL animals were created.
@@ichsehsandersthere’s no absolute proof that god exists. Much less that god being from the Bible. That’s what they mean. We move based on belief and faith, not science
Tbh I don't think young earth creationism is wrong. Talking just the fundamentals, most Hebrew scholars say the account of Genesis is written as a history book, not a metaphor. And evolution would be impossible in the 6 days of creation. Death came into the world after Adam and Eve sinned. What God made was perfect. How can you have evolution with no death? This is a very fundamental flaw in the compatibility of the Word and billions of years.
One note regarding ending slavery without a big war in England - they didn’t have to use violence. Slavery, specially agricultural slavery, wasn’t deeply entrenched into the economy of half the country, unlike America.
The idea that Christianity questioned and opposed scientific progress was touted throughout my educational career. It's sad that people still think this is true. Most Universities have their roots in Christianity.
@@Colddirector nope, the catholic church in spain was what funded Columbus' journey. They must have known the world wasn't flat to send someone around the world. Please do research
11:32 rather than the test paper swap analogy, here's a better suggestion: imagine a poor villager woman who has nothing going on for her. Suddenly a prince decided to marry her. Now she's suddenly rich, because her name is added to everything he has.
In school, when I was in 6th grade. I was taught about Bhuddism, Hinduism, Judaism, Islam, and Christianity. What I can remember about was taught about Christianity in school, was that Jesus was the son of God and when I asked if Jesus was a demigod my teacher answered that Jesus is both God and human at the same time which I didn’t understand at the time. I believe that my teacher taught about religion in a very respectful way, but I do hold the belief that people shouldn’t teach about a religion unless they have a deep knowledge and understanding of it.
11:35 is one of the most curious sections about salvation. I heard a sermon by a w tozer on this. He said that heaven isnt full of Earth's garbage. He said that to truly embrace Christ is to truly change into a good person. Certainly we ARE only saved through our faith of our LORD, but surely God wouldnt just overlook say, a pedo's sins just because he says he praises Christ. He would forgive him, but only if he was truly repentant. Part of the glory of God is that everybody has an individual relationship with him.
Being colonized by Christian colonists and conquistadors was the best thing to happen in the western hemisphere since the first people got there. You can have a colony of Christians proselytizing or Aztecs brutally sacrificing 10,000 people to a demon and Caribs eating each other. The choice seems pretty clear. And the crusades were about taking back territory that Muslims had conquered from Christians
I wouldn't say that when they lost 80% of their population yeah, it helped in the long run for everyone via the colombian exchange but you also have the Spanish getting millions killed in Iron Mines
Just so everyone knows.. the Catholics and protestants agreed a long time ago that both their understandings of what consitutes salavtion is legitante . Both agree the other is saved
2:15 not defending the pope here despite being Catholic myself, but seriously, when you are given a way to present your theories by your friend, the pope and you go around calling your friend, who is the Pope, an idiot in your published works, you're kind of asking for it. And he just got house arrest anyway so it's not like he was tortured.
@@giantotter319 read the whole comment including the first sentence. The pope was wrong and Galileo was inpolitic. He could have published his work if he hadn't been a d### about it.
@@TheCatholicNerd And the other time he wasn't a dick, and yet, was forbidden from publishing his stuff, Copernicanist books were banned and other astronomers were prosecuted? Was it also his fault, or was catholic church just not accepting of freedom in science?
I went to catholic schools throughout my life, and it just made me despise christianity even though it has taken me YEARS to deal with my traumas I'm finally starting to return to the faith not as a catholic though(YET)
I find it interesting that a public school is the thumbnail for this video because here in New Zealand public schools often have better values and beliefs than the 'Christian' private schools. Public schools here also tend to have a wider and diverse groups of people than private schools and so religion, while not taught, is often discussed among students. My public school in Christchurch has a very large student bible study that kids attend and religion is not mentioned in our science classes and our teachers allow us to hold our own beliefs. Just my random thoughts, great video, keep up the good work RZ😊
@@giantotter319 That's a bit unfair. This video is clearly made by an American for an American audience. He specifically stated in his intro that he's responding to lies told during his time in public school. He can't be expected to respond to every lie told across the entire world.
@@dahliaherrod4301 No, zoomer purposefully tried to make a statement of Public school - Bad and lies to you/ Christian school - Good and tells you truth. Even in the title of the video. He doesn't have to respond to everything, just needs to treat the subject with level head and stop trying to divide people.
the video makes some valid points about the history of Christianity and its core doctrines. however, it oversimplifies complex historical issues like the spread of Christianity, its relationship with oppression, and the diversity of biblical interpretations. it also downplays the impact of key historical figures and events like Constantine and the Council of Nicaea. while aiming for objectivity, the video's presentation is somewhat biased in favor of minimizing criticisms of Christianity.
Open Communist Arthur Miller has the monopoly on defaming the Puritans, specifically with his propaganda The Crucible being taught by retarded English teachers everywhere. It's difficult to fathom that by contrast, pretty much everybody you ever ask will have no idea what a "Holodomor" is. The death toll difference is only about 10-11 million minus 23 or so. Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you modern mass education!
I grew up in a Christian school and even I thought that Galileo was sentenced to death by the Catholic Church. It's actually a shock to learn that he was only sentenced to imprisonment. Granted, he was threatened with the death penalty if he continued to proclaim heliocentrism, but I was always under the impression that he didn't back down and was put to death.
Same thought here. In IP's comment section there were many historical references to previous belief in a literal reading of Genesis, and not that it "only" originated in the 1800's. It reads as quite antagonistic to point it only to SDA's as the origin, when it is quite not that way.w@mandiocatostada3859
I'm not saying you need to believe it, but I seriously recommend taking an actual deep research dive into young earth Creationism. It's not some anti-science movement. It's tens of thousands of Christian scientists in multiple scientific organizations applying as direct a scientific process as possible to confirm or deny their theories. This whole video is about "debunking lies told about Christianity," yet less than 5 minutes in you reinforce one of the biggest lies about a very large number of Christians.
@@Gr8Imres Mutation issues, genetic decay, irreducible complexity, apparent age, entropy, the entirety of the fossil record? I'm sorry, I thought we were just randomly throwing out buzz words with no explanation.
13:10 people started confusing paradise and heaven… heaven originally meant the sky, and paradise the future new earth for the saved ones… Jesus ascended to heaven and will come back from heaven to judge earth and bring paradise, a new creation… but before returning to a new earth, it is written he will take us to heaven, that’s why people got confused.
@MarkStein-b5b He claims that the Big Bad secular kings were the ones who caused crusades and forceful spread of christianity, while such a concept (secular ruler) didn't exist for at least several centuries after middle ages. Medieval rulers, their conquests and crusades were all connected to christianity and the church.
3:38 is a myth. Every one of Islam's scientific contributions, they stole from somewhere else. EVERYTHING that Islam had was taken from somewhere else. Horseshoe Arch, one of the most iconic Islamic architectural features. Visigothic Spain invented them. Algebra? India.
I think a more nuanced question is, did they "steal" the contributions, as in learning them from others & then claiming to be the first, or did different people independently make the discoveries, at different times, in different parts of the world, but muslims today mistakenly/falsely claim to be the originators?
A lie that we're told somewhere related is to trust in yourself, believe in yourself, YOU can do it. No, trust God, your heart is deceitful and your mind evil.
Don't forget the myth that "satan rules hell". A lot of people believe that. No. Hell is the place where the devil and all his demons and those who are not written in the book of life will be punished for eternity.
Remember Satan knew your god and wanted nothing to do with him and a lot of angels felt the same.
@@kevinkelly2162You don't even understand what it is that you're arguing. Please, if you're going to try this, try harder.
Hell is a myth. Where in the bible does it say you will be punished for all eternity? That literally contradicts John 3:16. What it does say is that there will be a judgement. Eternal death.
@@epsilon3821 try matthew 25:31-46
Oh, thanks for the clarification, Flowey.
Unfortunately, all these myths are spread by people who get their knowledge from Hollywood movies.
Gotta love the ultimate sin city spreading lies am I right?
Los Angeles has the most ironic name of any city on the planet
In every way possible it's hell on earth, city of Angels?, city of demons more like
Generalizing, but true to some extent.
Kinda makes you think about who’s making these Hollywood movies🤔
@sub.sa.3058they’re hidden motto is why believe in God when you can just “believe in yourself”. I pray they wake up from this lie
Remember: science is perfectly okay to study as a Christian. I have never seen anything wrong with studying God's creations and how they work. It's wonderful to work with science.
Yeah, Science is cool, I believe that you cannot refutate scientific observations. As a christian it makes me sad people use earthly things to say God is not real
@@ElChanty46 Indeed. Science should never be used as a weapon against God.
@@TotallyNotABotRightGuys Its beautiful to see how God's creation works, leave it here cuz I dont wanna sound like an NPC
You sure? Scientists are far less religious than other people and the amount of people becoming scientists are fairly proportionate. Higher education causes people to become less religious and as a religious person yourself do you really think that's a good thing?
@PhillipMoore-td5yi I didn't say you were required to be a scientist as a Christian. I just said that it's okay to learn about how things work. The way you phrased that made me sound like Kim Jong Un by sending people off to the careers of my choice.
Most Christians need to know that just wearing a cross necklace or just going to church doesn’t make you a Christian. Take control of your faith and build a relationship with Christ!
Russian foreign minister is Armenian
What part of the Nicene Creed, would the Filioque be apart of that? Both Orthodoxy and Western Churches have different views and each redefine the Trinity.
@@lutheranrussianI feel like nowadays if you wear a necklace you're LESS likely to take the faith seriously.
On my way to doing that!
Yeah, we need to change our ways. Faith without works is dead. And works without faith is dead.
I'm taking AP World History, and one of the first things my teacher said about Christianity was that Jesus never claimed to be the Messiah and that Christians argued this was due to his humility. I shared with him John 4:25-26 immediately after, and he said, "Oh, 'll look into it then." saying he studied world religions as an interest. Deception is causing misinformation. Please make sure we as Christians know the word so we can to tell the truth from a historical and spiritual standpoint. Jesus Christ needs the representative he deserves, albeit we can never fully and perfectly represent him, at least we can do our best by the Holy Spirit working mightily in us, giving us the desire to do his will.
Your world history teacher saying that Jesus never claimed to be the Messiah sounds like something an Islamic person would say.
How can a history teacher be so ignorant?
And then you woke up and realized it was Saturday. The old student teaching the teacher plot twist.
@@fredwoods-o3g Oh please, teachers can definitely be wrong or misinformed especially on a topic like history or religion, no plot twist here
@@weepingj While that's true, it's also a common apologetics story. In reality, an AP history teacher has no business bringing up these claims about Jesus, and if they do it as part of class, how is it they never herd the verse before?
There is no conflict between religion and science, but a conflict between true science and false science.
Can’t agree more👍
You are right. False Science has the Pope as noble prize scientist.
If anyone tells you that science has disproved the existence of God, it's safe to ignore his religious opinions.
What is an example of false science?
@@kosefixUniverse from nothing, multiverses, primordial soup, billions of years, human evolution from apes, junk DNA are all examples of false science
The biggest lie about Christianity is that it’s false. Jesus is Lord.
Your comment makes no sense?
Oh wait I'm being dumb I've got the reading comprehension of a brick wall
@@alfieingrouille1528lol
@@popxcleNG😂
Jesus is make believe.
@@lordvoldamort4606atheist saying "science is the truth" and yet still ignoring all the science saying Jesus was real.
Nowadays, unfortunately, the persecution of the first Christians is forgotten. I highly recommend the historical novel by the Polish Nobel Prize winner Henryk Sienkiewicz "Quo Vadis"
Maybe because it's been widely misrepresented by salty medieval authors. Quo Vadis is ahistorical.
@@giantotter319, In the case of medieval works, what we currently know is interpreted based on ancient accounts (which have been preserved directly or indirectly), so I don't think they are lying much in this matter.
"Quo Vadis" is not ahistorical. It is a historical NOVEL, so it was not written in those times (you can see from the author's last name), but Sienkiewicz really had a good historical workshop, and the novel reflects the spirit of those times
@@jakubkosz1009 There is plenty of ancient sources which were preserved through greeks or muslims. Christian authors have changed some of the narratives, though - namely the persecution of christians. For example the idea that Nero was insane and hated does not fit the way he was described at his time - he was bad at running rome and spent a lot of time on nonsense, but compared to many emperors he was almost capable. Also pretty popular in eastern part of the empire. Also Ogniem i Meczem is better.
Yes, I have read and re-read this novel from my teen years. I grew up in West Germany after WWII. My father was in the USAF and a "history nerd". We lived near Trier and often visited the Roman ruins and my father told my sister and I about how the Roman's "threw" Christians to the lions and other wild animals in the amphitheater. This book helped make me a more devout Christian. I have an original edition.
@@jilledmondson6894, as a Pole and Catholic I'm glad you liked it :) I am at my 22s and I just discovered this for myself (but generally in my country it is widely known). I saw that this reading allowed me to better understand my faith too (its sources, my behavior as a non-believer who is undergoing transformation, etc.). Greetings :)
It always kills me when I hear people say "Christians are just as violent as followers of the 7th-century prophet" and then they somehow try to compare a couple of sentences in Deuteronomy, and a few crusaders, with 1300 years of imperialism from the mideast and a huge percentage of that prophet's scriptures. And in current times, the only people I have ever seen politely knocking on doors with literature and kind persuasion are various self-proclaimed Christians (whether or not you want to grant Witnesses and/or LDSers that moniker).
Meh I've me plenty of Hindu Proselytisers.
Probably a difference though, is they usually want to sell you something at the same time.
You can't just ignore "a couple of verses in Deuteronomy" that urge genocide.
I once had someone somehow compare me to the Taliban. Right, because not killing isn't in the 10 commandments at all.
People forget the crusades only happened due to the Muslim conquest
Atheists will tell me to be rational. And I am rational, which is why I am Christian.
🗿
What they consider to be "rational" is really just accepting a lot of modern pressupositions that came from the enlightment.
😂
@@timhartman3359 I bet you feel really smart right now don’t you little Timmy
@@Chi_Rho-12 Yes.
I believed the good people go to heaven myth until I became a Christian. Amazing how badly the world is lied to.
Good people do go to heaven but not because they earned it. Be careful how you word things like this especially around children and non-believers. You will confuse people.
@stevied3400 there are no good people. No one is good but the Father
@@aaronharlow2137those who partake in the nature of God will be saved
@@aaronharlow2137 So no one is good. All the infants god killed in the flood? All evil. The 1000+ infants that die every day. All evil? All deserving of hell? Any religion that teaches you all kids are worthless wretches worthy of eternal torture is vile. Any God that tricks you into being born owing him worship or else be evicted into hell is a horrible being and even worse landlord.
Only by indoctrination of children or preying on the poor, drug addicted, and desperate, only through war, colonization, and threat of punishment are you able to coerce people into believing this nonsense. I have no problem letting my kid read any religious book including the Bible because I didn't indoctrinate them by saying there is only 1 truth and I'm the one that discovered it. All contradictions are false. I teach them to think critically and evaluate what they see and read. If Christians did this the religion would be dead in a decade, not counting the already indoctrinated.
@@aaronharlow2137God specifically deemed creation good, are we not creation?
I absolutely HATE when Christians juxtapose “old testament god” and “New Testament god.” It reeks of Marcionism.
Well yeah, I imagine yall hating that. Those darn prophets, can't live with them, can't live without them.
@Ask_Xi It doesn't say young girls, but women and children (as separate nouns). And, where does it say to make them into slaves?
If you interpret in a modern English context a translation of the Hebrew, then you can abstract it enough to metaphorically mean keep alive as in keep servants for yourself, but a charitable reading or just the actual Hebrew says to cause them to live amongst you. It's not enslaving them, it never says that anywhere in the text in Numbers 31, it's telling them to adopt them into the tribes of Israel.
They killed everyone who was married, probably because you hold an allegiance to those you're married to (God considers the married as becoming One), but someone who is without allegiance to the soldiers of the Midianites can be part of the Israelite tribe.
@@koderamerikaner5147 Congratulations! You have just justified genocide and sex slavery.
@@kevinkelly2162it is neither genocide or sex slavery
@Ask_Xi Numbers 18 clearly outlines the disgusting sexual deviancy of the surrounding pagan nations, the same kind of deviancy we now see becoming normalised in our own society now that it has opted to return to paganism.
And here you are, running to the defence of those people and their deviancy...
After reading the Bible myself, I discovered that Jesus Christ is life Himself. Life is ultimately meaningless without God and I am glad that the Lord showed me and many others His mercy.
Yes!
When I read the Bible, God opened my eyes and showed me Jesus is real and truly the Son of God!
life is meaningless with god as that means you've thrown all logic and rational thought out the window 😂😂😂 but have fun sleeping for all eternity
@@griffin9478 At least I’ll have lived a moral life and done objective good. So yes, I will sleep well. My question for you is, since God is real, where will you spend eternity?
@@Thatoneguy-pu8tyhe'll spend it in hell that's for sure 😂
@@griffin9478Bro did not listen to the video. Yap yap yap sucker
Athiest reddit is alone enough for me to reject athiesm embrace christianity
Atheism is the default position.
We know its the default position. Default because its the starting point from a lack of gained knowledge @lennonkelly-james2693
@@johnmcclane3747 The Bible is a book of fables and half-truths. It's for bad people who need to be mentally chained to stop them from doing bad things. Usually doesn't help though.
@@lennonkelly-james2693 there's plenty of proof
@@lennonkelly-james2693 More like agnosticism.
Bro my ancient world history teacher was talking about religion, and we had an assignment called “Islamic achievements” and half of the “Islamic” achievements were done by the Catholic Church 😭😭 like science and hospitals
nobody "does" science as an achievement, you seem to be pretty lost in this.
@@giantotter319 The only one lost here is you, he never said anything about anyone doing science for achievements, he said that for a school assignment he had to read up about modern innovations achieved by Islam, but half of the innovations we're done by the church. You call him lost yet you managed to completely misunderstand what the dude was trying to say all because of one word LMAO
@@AoMohammed Congratulation on repeating the same thing he wrote, guess that's only thing you all are good for. Point still stands. And as far as those christian innovations go, most in one way or another originated with greeks, muslims or jews. Christians just had a talent for codifying it. That was the case with math, healthcare, even cuisine.
@giantotter319 you have no idea what your talking about. Christianity invented modern science. Not the Greeks or the Muslims or any eastern cultures. Because Christianity gave many of the axioms and presupositions that are necessary for modern science to work.
Generations of historians and sociologists have discovered many ways in which Christians, Christian beliefs, and Christian institutions played crucial roles in fashioning the tenets, methods, and institutions of what in time became modern science. They found that some forms of Christianity provided the motivation to study nature systematically.[52]
- Noah J. Efron
@@giantotter319The three pre-conditions just discussed-the translations, the universities, and the theologian-natural philosophers-laid a foundation for the emergence of modern science because they provided an environment that was conducive to the study of science. . . . And without the support of the theologians and the Church, the medieval universities would have been unable to institute the science-logic-natural philosophy curriculum that began Western Europe’s long, uninterrupted involvement with scientific thought and problems Grant, The Foundations of Modern Science
"I'm not arguing for Christianity in this video, I'm just arguing for the objective historical facts"
That's called arguing for Christianity. Christ is king ✝
EDIT: Fun fact, the Islamic Golden Age was about 1% Islam and 99% the Persians.
The arabization of the middle east (and a little beyond) was horrible Iranians and Egyptians had such a cool culture before their fall too:(
What would a golden age of a religion even entail? I assumed everyone knew that that term refers to the Islamic world not the religion itself lol
Islamic Golden Age is 40% Assyrian and Melkite Christians who had knowledge of both Greek and Arabic so they helped translating classics into Arabic.
Al Ghazali would like a word with you
Persians were fucking based, until a drugged old man with a silly beard and his own cult said "Fuck that, gimme power, women and wealth!"
Your comment section is the most rational and respectful group of Christians I've seen on UA-cam. Congrats, props and well done.
if someone tells you christianity caused the crusades( 3 milion deaths in almost 200 years) then tell them atheism caused ww2, stalins soviet union and maos regime( ~150 milion deaths in ~50 years)
Also, before crusades muslims did lots of cruel, evil things and so the crusades had to stop the evil
How did atheism cause WWII? Pretty sure WWII was caused by nationalism, fascism, militaristic jingoism, and the Treaty of Versailles. And antisemitism, sure. But atheism? Yeah, I don’t think atheism caused WWII.
Also correlation does not equal causation. Just because Mao and Stalin were atheists doesn’t mean atheism caused them to commit atrocities.
Also, even if I grant *everything* you say as true (I.e. atheism killed 150 million), this entire argument is a whataboutism fallacy. Instead of addressing the deaths caused by Christians, you don’t deny they did it and that it was wrong, you just say “well atheists are worse,” which doesn’t vindicate Christianity. That would be like, if I said “9/11 was bad,” and someone replied “hey less than 3000 died in 9/11 but six million died in the Holocaust, why are you criticizing Al Qaeda buddy the Nazis are worse.”
How about a better idea, do not generalize every problem to the world to a Religion, be a good representative of God and view everything in full lens
@@caseycrowe3805 It's a bad argument yes. But to deny that the fruit of atheistic ideology "nationalism, fascism, militaristic jingoism" involved in a large amount of deaths in the 21st century is a failure to understand history and sociology. The fact is that atheism doesnt generate a worldview that ends with the overall benefit of mankind.
@@caseycrowe3805Not whataboutism. No one is denying that pretty much any belief can cause atrocities to occur. It's just that we hear time and time again about Christianity yet there is clear evidence atheism and other, non-religious ideologies have caused atrocities as well. We're simply pointing out that it's not correct to say atheism because no war, because that's simply not true. Just because you don't like bringing it up doesn't mean calling attention to it is wrong.
If only Young Sheldon could see this video
He isn't real
@@Zedreconno
Young Sheldon that is
@@Iesous_Christos_Nika_7 no what
@@Zedrecon Young Sheldon will be real in 52 minutes
When people told me that Rome released lions on criminals in the colosseum, they did not tell me the criminals were Christian’s.
Because they weren't the only ones thrown to lions, lol.
I think these myths are so pervasive that I often hear it from non-believers when I mentioned that I'm a Christian (I live all the way in SE Asia). People would try to argue with me about the bible over some grounds that they themselves aren't sure about. But I think all Christians should be equipped and ready to confront these arguments (1 Peter 3:15) hence why theology is essential. Thank you for the video!
"Now go and smite Amalek and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass."
1 Samuel 15:3, KJ21
Can you help me make this a just command from God? It is the children part i have a problem with...
When you are reading the bible you need to read it with the cultural context. The meaning of the verse yiu sent is not the complete physical murder of the amalek ppls but the destruction of their cultureal identity. The verse is akin to more like how ppl today says i completely murdered the other team etc.
ua-cam.com/users/livebFkJmAKfq2o?si=5A0W5_X-7kbSwviP
@@thomb.1326 Leviticus 18 explains it. These people were disgusting and they condemned their children and their civilisations to destruction...much like our own culture is apparently aiming for.
@Rocky-ur9mn
1.Why is it so specific in that even the infants and cattle are to be destroyed?
2.Its the COMMAND from God to Samuel, (very clear from the text if it is not misstranslated, wich gives a rise to many other problems if so) NOT the actual action that happend, since Saul actually didnt follow through, he Spared the King and some of the better cattle to offerd to God.
THEN he gets confronted by the profet Samuel, who reprimanded him for sparing the cattle and the King, Samuel then Beheads the King, Saul abdicates and David becomes the new king and God regrets that he made Saul king.
I know that the Amalekites werent wiped out, they reappear later in the texts.
My problem is again with the COMMAND OF SLAUGHTER and the reprimand for not following through, or the claim of inerrancy of the texts themselves (Jesus own words)
Just last day I was thought in a nursing Class that Christianity brought a dark Age in Nursing
😂
How did they come to that conclusion? Since they probably mean medieval times, Paul of Aegina and the Byzantine medical community would like to have a word. Just because they were working with theories(like the 4 Humors) that are outdated and completely absurd now doesn't mean it was a dark age
Where do they think the name of the Knights Hospitaller came from?
@@RabidLeech1 I assume its because they literally thought demons were possessing people during epileptic episodes rather than trying to figure out it was uncontrollable fires in the brains neurons.
@@nickhadknacks-z9qHow dare those backwards people not have access to time machines to be able to use EEG! Who cares that it wasn't invented until *checks notes* 1924(some research on electrical activity going back to the 1870s)?! That goes against this narrative I've built!
The Book of Genesis is what inspired the Big Bang Theory btw.
@@nicanorfredricksbirdrealm228 Eh, maybe in part. But it seems to me that part is limited mostly to the fact that both have the universe beginning to exist.
Genesis doesn’t line up with Big Bang Theory at all. First of all, the theory says nothing about the beginning of the universe, only the universe in its current form.
Take another look at Genesis 1. The Earth is unformed, and there is a vast ocean. That’s not empty. It actually aligns with an ancient model of the Earth: A flat disk where the sky is water contained in a solid firmament and held up by pillars. This idea pops up in various other places, especially Job 38-39.
@@seanpierce9386the Bible does not support the flat earth theory. you are referencing Genesis 1, yet are ignoring the Bible saying that light was created first, which holds to the Big Bang theory and our modern understanding of electromagnetism, amongst the foundation of all universal constants that hold space, matter and time together.
Christians do not typically hold to a flat earth view of the world, simply because the Bible does not confirm a flat earth creation of the world. The Bible isn’t primarily a scientific text, but people weren’t as ignorant as we think they were, considering Babylon had access to calculus dating back to the construction of the tower of Babel.
@@oxideaitunim What we call the speed of light is a universal speed limit. Photons just happen to travel at that speed through a vacuum, and they slow down in a medium due to the properties of waves. We have no idea what particles were created first, but given that the physics of the early universe were completely different than our own, it cannot have been anything we would call light. You’re probably just using this fact as a memorized apologetic. I would encourage you to think about the problem yourself.
You can’t have it both ways. Is the Bible scientifically accurate or not? If it is, then everything should be totally accurate with no mistakes. If it’s not, then why would a God-inspired book contain only the understanding of the world available to the people who wrote it? This is especially relevant in Job, where God is specifically trying to display His unknowable greatness with no need to appear reasonable to the people at the time.
@@jdotoz No. The big bang theory is about the expansion of the Universe, not the origin of the Universe.
One time, I was reading a history book in high school that erroneously stated that the Gospels were "..filled with contradictions". That's a false and very biased statement to make, and its totally unnecessary with regard to Jesus and the writings of his disciples.
Its a very true statement. You are biased for saying it has no contradictions.
@@Dcm193 no its really not, and I never said it has zero contradictions. I was trying to say that a more neutral statement or position should have been in the textbook. Also read Hegel, contradiction actually creates new knowledge through the dialectical process.
@Dcm193 I have yet to see one pointed out, so I'll continuing reading trying to find one
As a Muslim I found this video very informative. Thank you.
0:45 There is a really good video by a UA-camr known as InspiringPhilosophy on this called “Christianity's War Against Science Debunked!” if you want to learn more.
Inspiring philosophy is one of my favorite UA-camrs
I have officially drafted myself into the IP Mafia. Yes, he does a wonderful job.
Jesus Christ be praised
Always!!!
I mean I liked Santa Claus as a kid too but everyone's gotta grow up eventually
@@griffin9478All the pagans are mouthy until God raises up more dedicated pagans to hand your ass to you right before He comes to deal with you personally. Islam is riding high at one quarter of all people on earth and one quarter of all land and our governments have been giving them a free pass into our countries for a while at this point. Mouth off now before you hear the shahada slipping out from between your lips because its coming sooner than you will be able to accept and we both know you lack the constitution and the masculinity to speak thusly to them.
@@griffin9478which is why i can confidently say Jesus Christ is King and santa claus isnt. Because while no records of a red fat man flying around exist as real proof, we have plenty of the life of Jesus Christ, and his resurrection. However, we both know you didnt make this statement in good faith
@@griffin9478have your parents ever teaches you the concept of "respect" or is it just a myth
Science and christianity or theism period, are two beliefs that do not contradict each other. You can believe in both, and both come together perfectly
THANK YOU!!!!!
@@alfieingrouille1528 we evolved from monkeys
W theistic evolution
My big thing is I have never heard a compelling argument for physical Death existing before the fall
No, science and any religion are contradictory. Faith cannot coexist with rationality. What is not ultimately testable and repeatable is not science. A good scientist never says 'oh, this must be real!' but has to constantly look and see if things work to declare that what they have is a working theory. Any loyalty to any God is thus contradictory to how science works
referring to the thumbnail, my school got like 10x more liberal this year, last year it was pretty much not political at all, this year they had a whole ass 30 minute talk to not disrespect gender identity and sexual orientation and to be inclusive and shit, but they skimmed over racism in like 5 secs
Lol
both should be talked about
It’s political to not disrespect peoples gender identities?
@@Colddirector gender identity as a concept is political even
@@seriousvcat Not actively disrespecting someones gender identity shouldn't be. That should be simple courtesy.
"christianity spread mostly by conquest"
that much better describes a certain mideast religion
A certain middle-eastern religion which _invented_ "Holy War" and whose sacred texts actively promote it as a method of evangelism.
The religion of Ares isn’t Middle Eastern.
How do you think people heard about Christianity? Do you think people back then had flyers raining down from the sky, preaching about God and His Prophets? Yes, Islam spread by conquest. Yes, Christianity also spread by conquest.
Islam ☪️ 👀
No need to make up lies lmao
7:34 early church fathers weren’t the only early anti slavery Christian’s. There was also Moses himself freeing the lord’s people from Egyptian slavery so he could lead them to their designated holy land
I'll also add that a lot of Galileo's issue was that he was being kind of a jerk(still a lot of historical debate about whether this was intentional) by putting the Pope's objections, in a book he wrote in Italian(writing in the common language, rather than Latin was a very anti-establishment move at the time), in the mouth of a character named Simplicio, meaning buffoon, and that he refused to show his work and answer the Pope's theological concerns. This was also only about a decade or two after Martin Luther's 95 Theses so the Catholics were very paranoid about any challenges to their supposed authority at the time.
Galileo was twisting scripture to justify his belief, not because we Catholics were paranoid about authority. Also he was teaching his theory as fact while not having sufficent proof. Go to your local uni and teach some crack pot idea with NO PROOF and see how long you stay as a teacher.
He also claimed to be on firmer scientific ground than he was. Yes, he turned out to be mostly correct, but he didn't have enough evidence at the time.
It also didn't help Galileo's case that his model of planetary motion... didn't conform to the history of observations and could not make accurate predictions for the future. A lot of folks get wrapped up in the fact he was right about heliocentrism, but ignore the fact he was completely WRONG regarding orbits, Galileo believed orbits to be perfect circles.
As Kepler later figured out, orbits are NOT circles, they're elliptical, and that makes a MASSIVE difference when you start trying to use circle orbits to calculate the positions of planets.
Meanwhile, the model of the solar system in use at the time, a hybrid model that actually assumed the sun, moon and outer planets orbited Earth while the Inner planets orbited the sun, was actually MORE PREDICTIVE of planetary motion and BETTER FIT the historically recorded positional data.
In other words, Galileo was actually in many ways LESS scientific than the Catholic Church at the time, as he refused to consider other options even when his model did not fit observed data.
@@jdotoz No, he wasn't "mostly correct", his model was less predictive of planetary motion than either the full geocentric model complete with epicycles or the hybrid model that I mentioned.
The ONLY things his model got correct were the relative positions of the planets AND heliocentrism. But his model could not be taken, plugged in any date, and then accurately predict the location the planets would be in the night sky. Thus he was wrong about SIX OTHER aspects of his model (the orbits of the known planets at the time).
Last I checked getting that much of an assignment observably wrong was a failing grade. :P
@@peregry Compared to the mainstream model of the time I'd say it was pretty good.
Was anyone else here home schooled? Probably the only time in my life when I got enough sleep.
Homeschooling sucks, especially went hyper conservatives do it
I wasn't home schooled but I have a feeling that high school is an attempt to adjust you to a sleep deprived 9-5 life
Even middle age peasants got more time off than we do now
@@reisen9235 Exactly. It's completely insane that we teach people how long they should sleep and then just make them wake up at 7am(at least in my school).
Sup dude.
fellow homeschooled fella here, homeschooling also helped me bring back my faith🙏🏻
As an atheist, this video has basically been exactly what I've been looking for. There are so many disrespectful atheists and theists whose arguments are as weak as they possibly can be and have no understanding of the other side of the argument. Another myth that you might want to talk about is the myth that Jesus didn't exist. I see so many atheists saying Jesus didn't exist, but he has more evidence of existing than Julius Caesar (I believe he existed but does not have heavenly connection).
Went to public school and secular university... It's more common than not for people to believe all of these lies
The only thing that any Christian should say regarding slavery is that Christian nations ENDED IT. Not just within themselves. The entire Muslim world gave up on slavery because of Christian nations warships parked in front of their coast.
Many scientists were Christians, as were people who promoted hospitals, orphanages, education for girls, etc.
Christianity has improved the lives of every country it's been to. Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is Liberty.
Africa and India strongly disagree
@@samosadosa2409 Huh? In both those places Christian ministries have been giving a lot of aid lol.
@@donut9719 Through colonialism, hell yeah. Do you understand how that's wrong, or do you need to hear about the murdered native children in christian schools in canada?
@@giantotter319 Colonialism =/= Christian ministries. Those schools WERE ran by the Canadian colonial government.
@@giantotter319 Christ is not Christianity bro
I usually dumb it down for atheists but here's how it works in the Old Testament:
Israel: Help us!
God: Sure.
Israel in desert betrays God.
God spanks Israel then says: I barely saved you and you turn your backs on me? I'm gonna leave! "
Israel: Please don't, we're sorry.
God: Then worship me like you promised.
Israel: Can we have a King?
God: But I'm your King.
Israel: Please?
God: Sure. Here's a nice kid, David.
Later... Israel: Look at Baal, he looks nice. Let's worship him.
God: Not again.
God spanks Israel.
God: They are so forgetful, so I'll send them prophets to remind them.
Israel: We don't like these prophets, they keep saying bad things. Let's chase them away.
God spanks Israel again.
Israel says sorry.
God: I forgive you. So much so that I'll send you a Messiah.
Israel: Cool.
God: So stop chasing my prophets away.
Later... Israel betrays God and kills prophets.
God spanks Israel.
God: This is your last warning. Your punisment will last 400 years since I just can't get through to you. Come back when you are called.
Thus it was the reason why He was called the long-suffering, all-loving and forgiving God.
God you're an asshat dude💀
5:02 I want to add a point on the conquest part.
The reason why the crusades happened was because of the culture which influenced the European countries at that time.
Some of the European nations, particularly the Anglo Saxons, based their societies on pride and honour. So when the gospel was preached to them, they could not understand the basis of the message so they twisted it to suit their beliefs.
Since they thought that it was shameful for Jerusalem to be captured by the Muslims, they thought it was honourable for them to recapture in the name of the Lord. When in actuality, it was based on their pride.
So that’s why the subsequent crusades weren’t as successful compared to the first one, as they are not moving in the will of God
Actually science works better in christianity than in atheism
Its certainly more openminded bc we believe in heavens/hells/purgatory etc aka dimensions...
❤ in my mind anyhow
I’m curious why you think that. Do you think science was handed down to us by God Himself (directly or indirectly)? And if so, why didn’t He provide this earlier, in the Bible itself, like so many people expect?
@@ProchoicePeopleAreSociopaths Science is about what you can prove, not your fantasy world.
@@kevinkelly2162 science proved Jesus existed
@@ProchoicePeopleAreSociopaths How and when?
The anti-science one is particularly obnoxious. It’s been mostly pretty well debunked for decades now.
Its mainly to do with the history of the churches being against anything science related. Like the invention of the lightning rod, evolution,big bang cosmology etc
@ In what sense?
@@TitusCastiglione1503 religious institutions have historically been against fields of study that challenge religious beliefs.
@@Dcm193 what evidence has led you to this conclusion?
@@TitusCastiglione1503 snopes monkey trial
The worst lie I was taught about Christianity is that we are all "friends." We are not friends.
Who is "we"?
@@marlon8095 The children of God, the people that are made in God's image, people who are in the same religion as you, people in the comments who are religious, people who The Lord gives visions to, people who The Lord gives missions to...etc.
8 That christians are unskilled dancers.
that one isnt a myth
@@redeemedzoomer6053 Latino Catholics that know how to dance be like
@@redeemedzoomer6053 In Ohio, it is
@@redeemedzoomer6053Black Baptist churches would beg to differ
@@mandiocatostada3859 Ohio is a hoax
Those who say that Christianity is oppressive aren't oppressed enough to understand what real oppression actually is.
0:45 also about the scientific contributions. Don’t forget the massive contributions by our fellow orthodox brothers in the Byzantine Empire, virtually all of their Byzantine scientists and philosophers were Greek yet they were also devout orthodox Christian who became monks and bishops. Byzantine Greece produced polymaths in the medieval period such as Isidore of Miletus, John Philoponus and Leo the mathematician. Greece 🇬🇷 is essential in Christian history and science
Anyone who reads Daniel, Genesis or Revelation, knows God and Science go together.
And anyone with common sense and rational thought knows that God doesn't exist
@@griffin9478 So there was nothing then there was something then that something was stable enough to form but wasn't really that stable or something from nothing caused it to explode thus the big bang.
Genesis is very unscientific that many apologists try to act as if it's mistranslated not literal etc
@@kisstune don't get me wrong this guy is a dick but the earth was eternal and the big bang just changed it's form
Genesis1 takes its story from enoma elish which in both a god is splitting the water (which goddess Tiamat which is chaotic dragon with many heads) and those splitted parts become heaven & earth and bible refer to that dragon in (psalm74:13) and many other places by name leviathan ;it’s polytheistic story with many errors
"Science is the study of God's creation" ❤✝️
For those interested...Truth:
1) Christianity includes science
2) Christianity spread because it's the only God created / human discovered Way of Life
3) Christianity unites, but imperfect humans (including dedicated spiritually immature Christians) oppress themselves and others
4) Christians temporarily go to the paradise component of current heaven (e.g. soul is saved) and everyone else temporarily goes to Hades. When the new heaven/earth is here, on Judgement Day, either each human's soul is redeemed and their spiritual body is united with God and others in the new heaven eternally, or the human's soul is destroyed and spiritual body is eternally separated from God in hell.
5) One of God's many types of perfection is teleios (constantly spiritually maturing), hence God from Old to New Testament.
6) There is one Truth. The rare "narrow is the path" spiritually maturing Christians are one with the Truth: God gives free will (there is no predestination), real baptism (e.g. establishing spiritual connection with God) naturally eventually happens after a human starts and grows a relationship with God, etc.
7) Christians have discovered more of God and His/our reality over time...but the Truth hasn't changed.
Public school is horrible.
Look your probably right in many ways. But how is this helping seriously. How is statement public school is horrible helpful or good in any way. I'm a Christian I am going to public. Every single public is different. If someone told you all x is bad you would totally disagree. Like I highly doubt you would say scab. if you want to change the systems don't sit on the sidelines
amen brother
Nah, only if you live in the US. In Europe it's fairly decent.
It's not a sin for a Christian family to carefully make use of public school, as long as they monitor what is being taught and they are ready to pull their kids out if necessary. But as/if society improves we will come to realize that educating kids is way outside of the government's job and the government's aptitude.
@@joaovidentedefine fairly decent though. What school are you using as the measurement to compare the European public schools?
Another myth is that Christianity does not treat women well.
Salve Regina
Oh, and as of today, it’s her birthday as well! Happy birthday, Mother Mary!🥳
Christianity freed women by comparison to how they were treated under the paganisms of antique europe
@@nocsiou”better” does not mean “good”.
@@ColddirectorJust learn to be appreciative at this point.
Christianity was doing for things paganism wasn't in the most extreme misorgistic time.
@@user-Strong.Trinitarian Except Christian organizations consistently fight to hold back women’s rights right up to the modern day. This is like telling a plebeian to be grateful to the Roman Senate for overthrowing the monarchy to institute the republic when those same senators were weaponizing said republic to screw them over at every turn.
@@user-Strong.Trinitarian My reply got deleted. I said nothing even remotely edgy or TOS breaking. UA-cam’s management keeps getting worse by the fucking year.
To be clear it’s almost certainly not RZ’a fault, it’s UA-cam’s worthless automated content moderation. They’re likely using an LLM to filter comments, which is insane because it effectively means nobody even knows what the rules are and they’ll keep changing as the LLM intakes more data. I hate AI so much like you wouldn’t believe.
W NEWTON, ATHEISM IS SENSELESS
Yes, atheism is senseless. However you who believes in the Flying Spaghetti Monster are sound of mind
@@outmywritemind1739
I don't just blindly believe Christianity. I have tried Islam, and Judaism. I have a good substantial knowledge of church history and i can easily explain all essentials of the Christian faith. I understand apologetics: the nine extrabiblical sources for Jesus that still coincide with the bible and how the bible is 99.5 identical to the original manuscript.
The world is not eternal, there's a creator and that's God. You who doesn't believe has not been predestined by God to believe and will be damned by your sinful nature.
Yes i also believe in Calvinism, God's absolute sovereignty. Trust me, i myself cannot have the faith but it was God who changed the disposition of my heart to believe in him. May I preserve in the faith he has given and the Good Lord who starts his work in me shall finish it, Amen.
I don't just blindly believe Christianity. I have tried Islam, and Judaism. I have a good substantial knowledge of church history and i can easily explain all essentials of the Christian faith. I understand apologetics: the nine extrabiblical sources for Jesus that still coincide with the bible and how the bible is 99.5 identical to the original manuscript.
I also believe in Calvinism- God's ABSOLUTE sovereignty that means that if you don't believe in God it's because he hasn't called you to his from outside time while in time it seems you have rejected him but it is an uno reverso card
🥱
6:50 John Brown was kind of my gateway drug to conversion, I'm from where he was born and that motivated me to study him. The lyrics
"John Brown was John the Baptist of the Christ we are to see, Christ who of the bondsmen shall the liberator be, and soon throughout the sunny south the slaves will all be free, his soul is marching on- The conflict that he heralded, he looks on from Heaven to view, on the army of the Union with its flag red, white and blue, and Heaven shall ring with anthems over the deed they mean to do, his soul is marching on"
from the original "John Brown's Body" lyrics printed in The Tribune on December 16, 1861 made me weep. They still do most of the time.
He also raped and murdered several children. So.....
Could you do video on Eastern Catholicism similarly you did with Lutheranism, Baptism, Catholicism, Orthodoxy please?
Why? Eastern Catholicism is just in between Catholicism and Orthodoxy. It’s got no unique features of its own
Eastern Catholicism is just Catholics who larp as Orthodox and they don't even do a good job, like they combine Eastern and western customs in some places so its just so weird
Eastern Catholicism is a rite within the Catholic Church
I dislike Eastern Catholicism for how it tends to be seen. Eastern Catholics portray it as this kind of "reasonable middle ground" between Catholicism and Orthodoxy, but then you realise many of their beliefs are heretical to Catholics and it drags the Catholics down by showing that they're willing to tolerate literal heresies for the sake of unity and having more groups in communion with the pope.
@@itapi697 I know.
bro always has to bring up the 20 highlighter girl
Glad you're as insistent on the "Christianity is not anti-science" point as you are. Speaking as someone who is both Baptist in theology but also accepting of things like evolution, I often feel like I'm stuck in the middle of the Conflict Theory hitting me from both directions when I mention I'm not a YEC. My fellow conservative evangelicals tend to be YEC, although thankfully, nobody has called me a heretic, and often think I'm not being faithful to the text(Ignoring the many textual issues of YEC like the Tree of Life problem in Gen 3:22-24 that you've mentioned before and why the tree needed to be "guarded" if it was simply an obedience thing, or the question of how Day and Evening could exist and be 24-hour periods before the Sun and Moon were a thing, or how Adam and Eve had a frame of reference of death pre-Fall as shown in Gen 2:17 and 3:4, or why the animals needed to be "subdued" if everything was peaceful in the Animal Kingdom before the Fall, or how plants which are also living things could be food before death.) and atheists will think I'm inherently illogical for rationally coming back(I had almost completely lost my faith in college due to being confronted with secular biblical theory despite being at a Baptist college, along with things in my personal life) to the idea that God exists at all.
That idea that Christianity and mainstream science are incompatible is beyond frustrating. Even those YEC who are scientific about it like my pastor(who is a fantastic man of God btw, not attacking him or his faith here) reject mainstream science. Think we all need to have a bit more grace on that question and accept that it's an issue that strong, reasonable Christians, can disagree on.
Why do you believe in evolution? It can't be proven, and many scientists don't even believe it.
Not to sound dumb but what does YEC mean
@@AoMohammed YEC=young earth creationist. These are the people who take the 6 days in Genesis hyperliterally and believe in a 6,000 year old Earth.
@@bigfennecI don't necessarily have an issue with most YEC people. I disagree with them and do have issues with those who will go around claiming those like me are heretics and saying that any other view means you're not a serious Christian but not with YEC people in general(most of the people in my church family are YEC after all.) They are good, solid Christians, and I fully acknowledge and respect their faith and viewpoints.
@@HistoryNerd808 the problem is there there is literally a verse in gensis that defines what one day is. "God called the light “day” and the darkness “night.” And evening passed and morning came, marking the first day." so one day in genesis has a morning evening and night. and if we say, one day in genesis is 1000 years maybe, that would mean 333 days were just straight sunshine, and 333 years had straight darkness.
My school NEVER taught any of that stuff. Every teacher I have had as been Christian or just never touch religion at all, my science teacher is Catholic, my old history teacher spent a lesson all on B.C. and A.D. and how it does not stand for after death. And everyone who went to my school was Christian, I know only 2 kids who are atheist, and they don't even debate about it, they respect that people believe that God is real and is the Lord. My public school is one of the best, I hope you all have good ones too, and if you don't, make them good ones.
Bro called me out for not doing homework lol 🤣
Your best video in a while. Thank you!
Bruh, saying you shouldn't be Christian just because a few minor teachings today contradict older ones is like saying you shouldn't believe in science just because modern science teaches things people didn't used to believe.
Not to mention, many scientists were not only Christians but owed their discoveries and inventions to Christianity and the Bible.
Matthew Fontaine Maury was a naval officer and the founder of oceanography. He discovered the currents of the ocean after reading Psalm 8 and dedicating his life to it. Such currents are used today for shipping routes, freight and oil distribution, and underwater cables.
"many scientists were not only Christians but owed their discoveries and inventions to Christianity and the Bible." I disagree that "many" scientist claimed that their faith allowed them to make scientific discoveries. Regardless you have only cited one example. can you cite 3 more so that your quantifying word "many" is true? thank you my friend.
@@TboneWTFStephen Barr, Laura Bassi, John Billings, Édouard Eugène Désiré Branly, even gave you an extra ;)
@@robertm3329 Thank you for the response my friend. So how do these people prove that god exists? How are they any different from other believers? Can you now offer proof for gods existence? Thank you.
@@TboneWTFYou must be really strong if you can move the goalpost that far.
@@gamemakerloch6964 LOL. And you can't offer any credible answers as to why being a religious scientist proves there is a god. Good luck my friend.
Random question, what’s y’all’s favorite worship song? I’m Southern Baptist and mine is Gloria Patri.
He Reigns - Newsboys
Jesus keep me near the cross, old hymn
Ave Maris Stella
I believe that music is a gift from God and all music can honour Him.
If an infinite Lord with infinite power, infinite knowledge, infinite understanding and infinite compassion somehow cannot by our standards exist, how can we?
I dont rember who said it, but it was something in the line of "Those who decide what kids learn in school are those who will manipulate the next generation and beyond."
He/She was very, very real with that.
6:00 you can't say conquest isn't bad when thousands of people died just for a piece of land. "Thou shall not kill"
Massive oversimplification.
Should we have allowed 1930s Germany to overtake Britain without a fight?
If we don't fight no one dies.
It's just a peace of land afterall.
not to mention that making false converts out of of alot of people would drive them farther away from the Lord than coming to them proselytizing
Im a Christian; but also a longical person.
One of the things people get wrong about Christianity or religion in general, is that if we belive in God, we cant be rational or logical beings. But that isnt true. God wants us to be logical beings. He wants us to think for ourselves. But when we use science and reson against Him; that's when it bbwcomes wrong.
How could one possibly use science and reason against an existing God?
I'm wondering
@@ichsehsanders there are lots of evidence that a world wide flood did not happen, there is no way humans were created just one day after ALL animals were created.
@@ichsehsandersthere’s no absolute proof that god exists. Much less that god being from the Bible. That’s what they mean. We move based on belief and faith, not science
Tbh I don't think young earth creationism is wrong. Talking just the fundamentals, most Hebrew scholars say the account of Genesis is written as a history book, not a metaphor. And evolution would be impossible in the 6 days of creation.
Death came into the world after Adam and Eve sinned. What God made was perfect. How can you have evolution with no death?
This is a very fundamental flaw in the compatibility of the Word and billions of years.
Thanks for this great video, it's been a blessing to me!
One note regarding ending slavery without a big war in England - they didn’t have to use violence. Slavery, specially agricultural slavery, wasn’t deeply entrenched into the economy of half the country, unlike America.
The idea that Christianity questioned and opposed scientific progress was touted throughout my educational career. It's sad that people still think this is true. Most Universities have their roots in Christianity.
no bo polska to lewacki kraj, wbrew temu co niektórzy myślą
It’s undeniably true with young earth creationism. Evolution had and still has significant opposition on explicitly religious grounds.
@@Colddirector nope, the catholic church in spain was what funded Columbus' journey. They must have known the world wasn't flat to send someone around the world. Please do research
@@Colddirector Science started long before evolution came on the scene.
@@rebeccalindley153 okay? that doesn’t change my argument in the slightest
11:32 rather than the test paper swap analogy, here's a better suggestion: imagine a poor villager woman who has nothing going on for her. Suddenly a prince decided to marry her. Now she's suddenly rich, because her name is added to everything he has.
God Is The Greatest And Bless You All Amen ✝️♥️✝️♥️✝️♥️✝️
You will never see your loved ones again. Have fun believing in nothing 😂😂😂
@@griffin9478 Are You serious Believe a true will hear on your words?
@@griffin9478 The devil is deep in You, i pray for You!
In school, when I was in 6th grade. I was taught about Bhuddism, Hinduism, Judaism, Islam, and Christianity. What I can remember about was taught about Christianity in school, was that Jesus was the son of God and when I asked if Jesus was a demigod my teacher answered that Jesus is both God and human at the same time which I didn’t understand at the time. I believe that my teacher taught about religion in a very respectful way, but I do hold the belief that people shouldn’t teach about a religion unless they have a deep knowledge and understanding of it.
I think that principal should apply to everything related to education.
11:35 is one of the most curious sections about salvation.
I heard a sermon by a w tozer on this.
He said that heaven isnt full of Earth's garbage. He said that to truly embrace Christ is to truly change into a good person. Certainly we ARE only saved through our faith of our LORD, but surely God wouldnt just overlook say, a pedo's sins just because he says he praises Christ.
He would forgive him, but only if he was truly repentant.
Part of the glory of God is that everybody has an individual relationship with him.
Being colonized by Christian colonists and conquistadors was the best thing to happen in the western hemisphere since the first people got there. You can have a colony of Christians proselytizing or Aztecs brutally sacrificing 10,000 people to a demon and Caribs eating each other. The choice seems pretty clear.
And the crusades were about taking back territory that Muslims had conquered from Christians
I wouldn't say that when they lost 80% of their population
yeah, it helped in the long run for everyone via the colombian exchange but you also have the Spanish getting millions killed in Iron Mines
Just so everyone knows.. the Catholics and protestants agreed a long time ago that both their understandings of what consitutes salavtion is legitante . Both agree the other is saved
There's no conflict between religion and science. Science explains how, religion explains why.
Hey! Just found your channel! I'm a new lutheran and your video are amazing! God bless!🙏🏻
2:15 not defending the pope here despite being Catholic myself, but seriously, when you are given a way to present your theories by your friend, the pope and you go around calling your friend, who is the Pope, an idiot in your published works, you're kind of asking for it. And he just got house arrest anyway so it's not like he was tortured.
So, is "he made the pope mad" a solid enough reason to silence new ideas in science?
@@giantotter319 read the whole comment including the first sentence. The pope was wrong and Galileo was inpolitic. He could have published his work if he hadn't been a d### about it.
@@TheCatholicNerd And the other time he wasn't a dick, and yet, was forbidden from publishing his stuff, Copernicanist books were banned and other astronomers were prosecuted? Was it also his fault, or was catholic church just not accepting of freedom in science?
I went to catholic schools throughout my life, and it just made me despise christianity even though it has taken me YEARS to deal with my traumas I'm finally starting to return to the faith not as a catholic though(YET)
no harm, we Catholics have a meme that Catholic Schools makes more atheists than Catholics
don't be a Catholic. Be Presbyterian :)
@@redeemedzoomer6053I'm leaning very Anglican ngl
my father is even on my Local Anglican church council.
@@PabloVelasco-hr3koWell that's exactly what happened to me
I find it interesting that a public school is the thumbnail for this video because here in New Zealand public schools often have better values and beliefs than the 'Christian' private schools. Public schools here also tend to have a wider and diverse groups of people than private schools and so religion, while not taught, is often discussed among students. My public school in Christchurch has a very large student bible study that kids attend and religion is not mentioned in our science classes and our teachers allow us to hold our own beliefs.
Just my random thoughts, great video, keep up the good work RZ😊
you'd need for americans to care about the rest of the world for this to be relevant.
Chch is generally more conservative than the rest of the country. Public schools in Wellington, not so great.
@@vijilantVery true, a lot of kids in Chch are actually farmers who are boarding at a town school.
🤣🤣
@@giantotter319 That's a bit unfair. This video is clearly made by an American for an American audience. He specifically stated in his intro that he's responding to lies told during his time in public school. He can't be expected to respond to every lie told across the entire world.
@@dahliaherrod4301 No, zoomer purposefully tried to make a statement of Public school - Bad and lies to you/ Christian school - Good and tells you truth. Even in the title of the video. He doesn't have to respond to everything, just needs to treat the subject with level head and stop trying to divide people.
Good book on this: Dominion by Tom Holland. Answers a lot of these ridiculous things from a secular standpoint.
the video makes some valid points about the history of Christianity and its core doctrines. however, it oversimplifies complex historical issues like the spread of Christianity, its relationship with oppression, and the diversity of biblical interpretations. it also downplays the impact of key historical figures and events like Constantine and the Council of Nicaea. while aiming for objectivity, the video's presentation is somewhat biased in favor of minimizing criticisms of Christianity.
RZ, since you are a Minecraft youtuber, you should make a reaction to the trailer for the live action movie
I swear private schools teach Catholicism way more better than public school from what I've heard
Maybe because most private schools are Catholic
3:27 the Big Bang theory doesn’t imply a beginning necessarily- it only means that what happened before it no longer matters.
Hey Zoomer, you should make a video debunking common misconceptions about the Puritans.
Open Communist Arthur Miller has the monopoly on defaming the Puritans, specifically with his propaganda The Crucible being taught by retarded English teachers everywhere. It's difficult to fathom that by contrast, pretty much everybody you ever ask will have no idea what a "Holodomor" is. The death toll difference is only about 10-11 million minus 23 or so. Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you modern mass education!
I grew up in a Christian school and even I thought that Galileo was sentenced to death by the Catholic Church. It's actually a shock to learn that he was only sentenced to imprisonment. Granted, he was threatened with the death penalty if he continued to proclaim heliocentrism, but I was always under the impression that he didn't back down and was put to death.
Love and peace all my brothers and sisters in Christ who are sharing the truth🙏❤✝
and everyone else😚
3:58 that’s not true at all. Thats nonsense. Clearly haven’t bothered reading YEC answers to such charges.
Yeah there’s no way that no one believed in a literal interpretation of Gen 1 before Ellen White
@@RabidLeech1True, he probably got that from the Inspiring Philosophy video but he literally adresses that
Same thought here. In IP's comment section there were many historical references to previous belief in a literal reading of Genesis, and not that it "only" originated in the 1800's. It reads as quite antagonistic to point it only to SDA's as the origin, when it is quite not that way.w@mandiocatostada3859
@@OrionFineArt He doesn't watch IP's videos correctly because he is prejudiced against him, just because he's a Baptistocostal
@MarkStein-b5bthat's still not a problem for the text. God likely created light itself before creating the sun.
W Issac newton 2:29. Always knew he was the brightest mind.
I'm not saying you need to believe it, but I seriously recommend taking an actual deep research dive into young earth Creationism. It's not some anti-science movement. It's tens of thousands of Christian scientists in multiple scientific organizations applying as direct a scientific process as possible to confirm or deny their theories.
This whole video is about "debunking lies told about Christianity," yet less than 5 minutes in you reinforce one of the biggest lies about a very large number of Christians.
If you've never seen it, Hydroplate theory: ua-cam.com/video/4hhE6tzJR_c/v-deo.html
that contradicts science in many ways
@@Gr8Imres Can you explain the contradictions to me, or are you just parroting what you've been taught?
@@camerapasteurize7215 half lives, evolution, the entirety of the nebular hypothesis
@@Gr8Imres Mutation issues, genetic decay, irreducible complexity, apparent age, entropy, the entirety of the fossil record?
I'm sorry, I thought we were just randomly throwing out buzz words with no explanation.
13:10 people started confusing paradise and heaven… heaven originally meant the sky, and paradise the future new earth for the saved ones… Jesus ascended to heaven and will come back from heaven to judge earth and bring paradise, a new creation… but before returning to a new earth, it is written he will take us to heaven, that’s why people got confused.
As an Ex-Jehovah's Witness who's not religious but still believes in God, your videos are informative. Now I'm a subscriber. ❤
Is there a place where I can find your sources for this information?
I asked him that a few months ago, but he did not respond.
It is not a Wikipedia article or scientific paper just a UA-cam video. Do your own research.
@@Ordo1980 God forbid someone is called out for the information they spread online
@MarkStein-b5b He claims that the Big Bad secular kings were the ones who caused crusades and forceful spread of christianity, while such a concept (secular ruler) didn't exist for at least several centuries after middle ages. Medieval rulers, their conquests and crusades were all connected to christianity and the church.
Mostly goggle and Wikipedia
3:38 is a myth.
Every one of Islam's scientific contributions, they stole from somewhere else. EVERYTHING that Islam had was taken from somewhere else.
Horseshoe Arch, one of the most iconic Islamic architectural features. Visigothic Spain invented them.
Algebra? India.
The Islamic golden age and the Bhagdad house of wisdom contributed a lot
I think a more nuanced question is, did they "steal" the contributions, as in learning them from others & then claiming to be the first, or did different people independently make the discoveries, at different times, in different parts of the world, but muslims today mistakenly/falsely claim to be the originators?
@@bri-chimchimcher-ee6955 It's the latter.
What mathematicians today call algebra is abstract algebra and was founded by Armenian mathematician Emil Artin and Jewish mathematician Emmy Noether
Ok, then from whom did Al-Khwarazmi stole the solution for quadratic equations?
Its even common here in Philippines
1:41
I'm a christian but buddy, they didn't try to silence, imprison, and kill Einstein.
Einstein didn't assault Oppenheimer for proving black holes though, did he
A lie that we're told somewhere related is to trust in yourself, believe in yourself, YOU can do it. No, trust God, your heart is deceitful and your mind evil.
just as a correction, Isaac Newton wasn´t christian. He believed in God but rejected the trinity
Are you Colombian bro ?
@@damianpaez yea