A user story is clear and concise information given to the scrum team by the product owner. Which outlines the requirements that a customer wants in their product.
A user story is an excellent starting point where the product owner, scrum team and scrum master can understand the needs of customers/users. They can transparently see what needs to be done.
A great user story provides a clear and concise description of a product feature. It answers the questions of who, what and why and provides the development team with clear information on what outcome is needed.
The way a user story is scaffolded really resonates with me. I also really like the fact that it all starts with three simple questions that SHOULD be easy to answer, and is a solid framework that allows it to be repeated with minor edits for each user story (As a (user) I want a (goal) so that I can (achieve value)).
I continue to be inspired by how familiar a lot of these concepts are to my experiences with teaching, directing, and even acting. The best way to approach a complex problem is to break it down into digestible/doable pieces. The simplicity of the format for user stories keeps the focus concise. Including the why keeps the team focused on the value they are moving to create and puts the end user in the spotlight. User stories also keep the Agile values central, especially being people centered. User stories also guide the conversation around them and adjusting them via acceptance criteria and clarifies the task further.
My understanding of a User Story is having an outline of Who, What, and Why for a product that will help the team understand what the final picture is expected to look like and achieve for its customers.
This video did a great job of answering questions of mine regarding the definition of a "user story". I now understand that a User Story is the definition of a project, written in story form: (This User) wants (this product) that solves (this problem) so that they can be awesome (in this way)/ achieve (this goal). The Acceptance Criteria is, essentially, a a definition of success on which a team agrees: We will know that we have met our goal in creating this product when it does (this), (this), and (this, etc.). I love this method of defining a project- I believe that most humans connect best in the story form of communication, as it keeps the broader contexts of a project in focus. A question that I had after watching this video is: what is an Acceptance Criteria? I gathered what it is from reading some of the comments. But by the end of the video, if one does not previously come from a tech production background, one may wonder as I did, if an Acceptance Criteria is a list that outlines the questions a team has about the project"s criteria, that must be verified by the customer, by which a team determines whether they will accept a project; or, whether it is a simple definition by which we can know when the project is done and functions as our customer needs it to function. I have now realized that it is the latter. However, I thought it may add some value to mention this because I do not see that term defined so far in the course. I may not be the only one who wondered. ;)
As a social worker, we are trianed to write so much for documentation purpose and assessments thats why I think I like User Story. Three simple words and you can write as much or little for each words and it will be the same. Its also nice that this whole manifesto is a tean work and not individuality.
A user story is a great way to keep the Agile framework progressing. It shows the development team who they are developing for, what the goal is, and what kind of value it can bring to the customer. The Acceptance Criteria creates a solid end goal, and the user stories make it so that the end goal can be reached in multiple ways.
User story is valuable information taken from the end user back to the team and sifted through. Using the INVEST method is going to make things concise and easy for product owners to undertsand.
user stories seem to provide a tremendous amount of value with how they are broken down. It's simple yet concise and allows for the plan to be malleable till you find the right course of action.
User stories captures the product description from the view of the consumer. Simply answers who, what, and why so the development team can understand what is needed.
It's great to hear the idea of product development discussed with such a high emphasis on user point of view. It's amazing what simply changing the way we approach tasks (even just in the wording, from "As a developer I want"...to "As a user I want") can do for the end result
The best thing about user stories is their ability to align the development team with user expectations, facilitate collaboration, and provide a structured yet flexible approach to delivering value in a customer-focused manner.
User stories seem so much more valuable than a comprehensive and set document. The ability to converse with the user and it be in a collaborative way must make the process so much more enriching.
User stories are a great way to ensure there is a market for the end product. The 3 C's and the INVEST acronym are solid ways to get the teams thoughts in a productive place when creating these user stories.
The 3 C's and INVEST acronyms help me understand what is expected in creating a user story. I can have a short and concise checklist while conversing with the customer about what they are looking for in the product.
A user story is a concise description of a product feature from an end user's point of view. It is flexible and adaptive based on the changing wants of the product owner and customer.
The INVEST anagram is such a great way to simplify the process of creating these user stories & AC. This way, the simplicity transfer downstream to the AC and the clarity of what needs to be done per sprint.
Invest method and User Stories are an amazing way to work as a team and creating products that fully comply with the ideas of the clients, it is a very interesting way of mixing the vision of the client and what as a team we can offer.
A user story includes the 3 major parts of a project which are the who, what, and why. Who is going to use the product/software, what do they want to do with the project, and why do they want to do it. The user story does have to flexible though to help out the development team achieve it's goal frequently.
My understanding of a user story is that is something that the team uses to gain perspective to what the customer wants. The user story should be something small enough that it can be added during a sprint and completed in a few days that the whole dev team understands the importance of it being added and what it means for it to be successfully added through pass fail tests.
This is really getting interesting, and I am falling in love with the practice of agile. Yes, product owner writes the initial user story based on users response of product for team to decide on its acceptance.
User stories are written from the end users point of view and utilized to deliver how a product feature or piece of work will bring value to the customer. When creating user stories who, what, and why is kept in mind which helps ensure the product achieves the goals and values that they are trying to meet for their customers.
A user story is a way to simply tell a development team what to produce, who they are producing it for, and why the product will bring value. It also makes sure that everyone is on the same page in terms of the final product. One thing I want to examine more is how to determine if a user story will be "small".
A user story is a simple description of a product feature written from an end user's POC. It includes the 3 main parts which are the who, what, and why. Who is going to use the product/software, what do they want to do with the product, and why do they want to do it. The user story must be flexible and able to adapt to the Product Owner/customer's needs. Should be completable in a few days.
User stories describe who an end-user is, what they want and why. They give a basic description of want the user is wanting to see from a product in order for the team to build upon this foundation with user input.
The user story is the intuitive&responsive approach to the deliverable generated by the agile dev team. It is attained through comprehensive and detailed feedback gathering.
I'm really enjoying watching these videos that focus so much on teamwork. This has worked well for me in the past, and I'm excited this seems to be the best method of getting jobs done in this career that I'm looking to move into.
A user story is a way for the development team to form a more fulfilling relationship with not only their product but also their customer. insuring that the end product is enriching and useful for the target audience
A user story to me means laying out the needs of the client so that the development team knows exactly what to do. It also breaks down goals into measurable and independent tasks, which are great for the Agile framework.
User stories are short and simple descriptions of what the customer would like to get out of a product. They are used to begin guiding the product owner and team in the development of the product.
After watching this video, the biggest takeaway for me is that user stories are simple descriptions of a product feature that is written from the user or customer's perspective. In order to test user stories, acceptance criteria are made per user story in order to see what customer needs need to be satisfied by this specific user story.
As I understand it, a user story is a description of a product or feature from the user or stakeholder's point of view. It includes who is using it, what the feature is or the goal, and what value it brings. There are certain acceptance criteria that need to be met before a user story is completed.
The INVEST method makes it easy to take a concise idea to the team to explain who the product is for, what is its intended use and why it's going to bring value.
A User Story, is a simple description of a product feature that captures the "who", "what", and "why". This is collected by the Product Owner and then shared with the development team where the can converse about the 3 C's and confirm their understanding. While confirming, they made add Acceptance Criteria.
User stories are mostly used to identify what a customer wants out of a product. It focuses on the who, what, and the why of customers expectations. With the INVEST it helps us understand who to create the perfect user story to help the rest of the team.
A User Story is a simple description of a product feature used to ensure the dev team can provide a useful product to the end user. By using the 3 C's and INVEST, a team can better create a useful product for the target audience, that allows that audience to accomplish their goal. Transparency with the product owner on what the team intends to do is key here.
A user story is a simple demand from customers in simple words which the scrum team can use to create a product to supply the demand of the customer. As the story will give information about the user, need and the value of the product , scrum team may extract products guidelines and many different options in the form of acceptance criteria through card, conversation and confirmation.
User story is a short, simple, and informal written description of the product (software) from a user's perspective. It is for the team to understand what the user wants within the product.
User stories is the description of a product feature that is written from the end users POV. It entails WHO the user is, WHAT is their goal and WHY is it a story they will value.
The User stories are super important so we think of as many different points of view regarding our product. This, in turn will make the product an all-around success no matter the type of user.
My understanding of a “user story” is that the “user stories” are simply another tool to help product owner develop products that meets the needs and wants of the users. (Marketing tool)
A user story is a conversation, not a requirements document, that facilitates a shared understanding of the customer's needs with the development team. User stories should include Who, What and Why as well as acceptance criteria.
A user story is a breakdown of what user want in their products. As given in the example, the products owner and user want to log in or create an id using Facebook, Instagram. It is mentioned in the story and the developer used that story and code it and make a products/software to login using the Facebook, Instagram and social sites.Products owner gives the story of what they want in their products and the products are developed by a developer. QA test the products matching the user story and release final products to the product owner.
If the Product Owner is creating the Acceptance Criteria, can some of these be denied during the confirmation? Are they re-written or removed completely until the next sprint?
Looks like you can use User Stories to quickly figure out more specifically what the end user wants from the product in development. Also, helps the team and PO establish goals and ways to achieve what the end user wants
User stories include who (user), what (goal) and why (value/benefit) along with conditions (acceptance criteria) that must be executed successfully when tested, to satisfy customers' needs.
A user story should be clear and concise. Referencing who the user is, what the goal the user has, and why the goal is valuable. Using the acronym “INVEST” to create the best understanding of every user story.
Assuming that the user story, for example is "As a ordering technician I want to see the orders submitted through the portal (GUI for sake of example) so that I can reduce duplicate orders", what is the best way to determine if the story is small enough to finish in a few days per the INVEST criteria? Would there be another step to consider aside from communicating with the team and product owner to identify story priorities?
In the beginning of a new large project, it has to be pretty overwhelming for a product owner to take a ton of feedback from end users. How do product owners actually communicate and connect with these end users, and how often are they asking for new ideas? Is this consistently taking place during the sprint review where stakeholders are allowed to join, or is the product owner randomly informed of new things that need to be added to the backlog?
The user story is developed to help the team understand who, what, why this particular section (need) of the software is being developed. What it's purpose is and what they customer is looking for the end product to be.
I understand that it's better to have independent user stories, but sometimes reality falls far from that, so what tis the best way to deal with situations where there are dependencies?
A user story is a simple description of a product feature written from the end user's point of view. Using both the 3 C's and INVEST can help reach a goal more effectively and efficiently.
User stories are used to create detail an actionable and executable piece of the project. These stories help guide the team to create something that will meet the acceptance criteria.
The user story is a effective, streamlined tool used by the dev team to ensure they're on the same page as the client and to help keep the dev team on task.
User stories should address who the user is, what the user wants accomplished, and why the user wants that feature (what value does it bring?). Additionally, it should not depend on other user stories, should be negotiable (flexible, able to adapt), valuable to the user, estimatable in regards to what it will take to get it done, small, and testable with pass/fail results.
User story starts from a composition of the three C'’s: Card, Conversation, and Confirmation. Great user stores stores are determind by using the INVEST METHOD. Acceptance criteria is added to a user story to help bridge any gaps in between development and needs of customer defined by PO.
What is the most common method of writing these user stories? I've read that they're usually on post-it notes, index cards, or done on some sort of project management software. Is one method better or more effective/efficient than the other?
The user story is an empathetic way to look at how to develop the product with the user at front of mind, focusing on who the user is, what they're trying to accomplish, and why they have that desired outcome.
A user story is an explanation of a product feature written from a user's point of view. It should clearly describe the who, what and why to the dev team.
If a product owner always has 10 acceptable criteria in all of their stories, does getting them down to the best 7 help? What if they all relate and contribute to the story?
A user story is clear and concise information given to the scrum team by the product owner. Which outlines the requirements that a customer wants in their product.
A user story is an excellent starting point where the product owner, scrum team and scrum master can understand the needs of customers/users. They can transparently see what needs to be done.
User stories are the backbone of agile projects, describing what users want from a product. They capture who wants what, why, and the benefit.
A great user story provides a clear and concise description of a product feature. It answers the questions of who, what and why and provides the development team with clear information on what outcome is needed.
The way a user story is scaffolded really resonates with me. I also really like the fact that it all starts with three simple questions that SHOULD be easy to answer, and is a solid framework that allows it to be repeated with minor edits for each user story (As a (user) I want a (goal) so that I can (achieve value)).
I continue to be inspired by how familiar a lot of these concepts are to my experiences with teaching, directing, and even acting. The best way to approach a complex problem is to break it down into digestible/doable pieces. The simplicity of the format for user stories keeps the focus concise. Including the why keeps the team focused on the value they are moving to create and puts the end user in the spotlight. User stories also keep the Agile values central, especially being people centered. User stories also guide the conversation around them and adjusting them via acceptance criteria and clarifies the task further.
User stories are independent, valuable statements written from a customer perspective used for capturing and communicating requirements.
My understanding of a User Story is having an outline of Who, What, and Why for a product that will help the team understand what the final picture is expected to look like and achieve for its customers.
This video did a great job of answering questions of mine regarding the definition of a "user story". I now understand that a User Story is the definition of a project, written in story form: (This User) wants (this product) that solves (this problem) so that they can be awesome (in this way)/ achieve (this goal). The Acceptance Criteria is, essentially, a a definition of success on which a team agrees: We will know that we have met our goal in creating this product when it does (this), (this), and (this, etc.). I love this method of defining a project- I believe that most humans connect best in the story form of communication, as it keeps the broader contexts of a project in focus.
A question that I had after watching this video is: what is an Acceptance Criteria? I gathered what it is from reading some of the comments. But by the end of the video, if one does not previously come from a tech production background, one may wonder as I did, if an Acceptance Criteria is a list that outlines the questions a team has about the project"s criteria, that must be verified by the customer, by which a team determines whether they will accept a project; or, whether it is a simple definition by which we can know when the project is done and functions as our customer needs it to function. I have now realized that it is the latter. However, I thought it may add some value to mention this because I do not see that term defined so far in the course. I may not be the only one who wondered. ;)
A user story seems to be the driving force of tasks, connecting the needs of the customer to the goals of the team.
Thanks for this point of view!
As a social worker, we are trianed to write so much for documentation purpose and assessments thats why I think I like User Story. Three simple words and you can write as much or little for each words and it will be the same. Its also nice that this whole manifesto is a tean work and not individuality.
A user story is a great way to keep the Agile framework progressing. It shows the development team who they are developing for, what the goal is, and what kind of value it can bring to the customer. The Acceptance Criteria creates a solid end goal, and the user stories make it so that the end goal can be reached in multiple ways.
User story is valuable information taken from the end user back to the team and sifted through. Using the INVEST method is going to make things concise and easy for product owners to undertsand.
user stories seem to provide a tremendous amount of value with how they are broken down. It's simple yet concise and allows for the plan to be malleable till you find the right course of action.
User stories captures the product description from the view of the consumer. Simply answers who, what, and why so the development team can understand what is needed.
thanks for sharing!
It's great to hear the idea of product development discussed with such a high emphasis on user point of view. It's amazing what simply changing the way we approach tasks (even just in the wording, from "As a developer I want"...to "As a user I want") can do for the end result
The best thing about user stories is their ability to align the development team with user expectations, facilitate collaboration, and provide a structured yet flexible approach to delivering value in a customer-focused manner.
User stories seem so much more valuable than a comprehensive and set document. The ability to converse with the user and it be in a collaborative way must make the process so much more enriching.
User stories are a great way to ensure there is a market for the end product. The 3 C's and the INVEST acronym are solid ways to get the teams thoughts in a productive place when creating these user stories.
The 3 C's and INVEST acronyms help me understand what is expected in creating a user story. I can have a short and concise checklist while conversing with the customer about what they are looking for in the product.
A user story is a concise description of a product feature from an end user's point of view. It is flexible and adaptive based on the changing wants of the product owner and customer.
thanks for sharing!
Users stories are basically conversations about what a user might want from a product/feature written from the user's perspective.
User stories really help the team understand what the end result needs to be so that they can find solutions on how to achieve that
A user story is a description of a product feature written from the perspective of the customer. It captures the questions: who, what, and why.
The INVEST anagram is such a great way to simplify the process of creating these user stories & AC. This way, the simplicity transfer downstream to the AC and the clarity of what needs to be done per sprint.
I appreciate the breakdown of how a user story should be written (Who, What and Why principles) and the check point of INVEST
Yes Fraura Yes! Thank you for the insight.
Invest method and User Stories are an amazing way to work as a team and creating products that fully comply with the ideas of the clients, it is a very interesting way of mixing the vision of the client and what as a team we can offer.
A user story is a conversation that is had about what the user wants in their software that captures the who/what/why of the whole idea.
I like the INVEST method. It makes writing a user story simple and you meet all the acceptance criteria.
A user story includes the 3 major parts of a project which are the who, what, and why. Who is going to use the product/software, what do they want to do with the project, and why do they want to do it. The user story does have to flexible though to help out the development team achieve it's goal frequently.
The user story provides a valuable perspective that the team can use to fully achieve the actions necessary to build a completed product.
My understanding of a user story is that is something that the team uses to gain perspective to what the customer wants. The user story should be something small enough that it can be added during a sprint and completed in a few days that the whole dev team understands the importance of it being added and what it means for it to be successfully added through pass fail tests.
User stories are statements that will lay out the expectations and outcomes that a user desires in a particular feature.
This is really getting interesting, and I am falling in love with the practice of agile. Yes, product owner writes the initial user story based on users response of product for team to decide on its acceptance.
User stories are written from the end users point of view and utilized to deliver how a product feature or piece of work will bring value to the customer. When creating user stories who, what, and why is kept in mind which helps ensure the product achieves the goals and values that they are trying to meet for their customers.
User stories are descriptions of a desired feature. They should be written in a way that is clear and easy to understand.
A user story is a way to simply tell a development team what to produce, who they are producing it for, and why the product will bring value. It also makes sure that everyone is on the same page in terms of the final product. One thing I want to examine more is how to determine if a user story will be "small".
We love your thought process. You're on the right track!
A user story is a simple description of a product feature written from an end user's POC. It includes the 3 main parts which are the who, what, and why. Who is going to use the product/software, what do they want to do with the product, and why do they want to do it. The user story must be flexible and able to adapt to the Product Owner/customer's needs. Should be completable in a few days.
User stories describe who an end-user is, what they want and why. They give a basic description of want the user is wanting to see from a product in order for the team to build upon this foundation with user input.
Thanks for sharing
The user story is the intuitive&responsive approach to the deliverable generated by the agile dev team. It is attained through comprehensive and detailed feedback gathering.
I'm really enjoying watching these videos that focus so much on teamwork. This has worked well for me in the past, and I'm excited this seems to be the best method of getting jobs done in this career that I'm looking to move into.
A user story is a way for the development team to form a more fulfilling relationship with not only their product but also their customer. insuring that the end product is enriching and useful for the target audience
A user story to me means laying out the needs of the client so that the development team knows exactly what to do. It also breaks down goals into measurable and independent tasks, which are great for the Agile framework.
Thanks for this point of view!
User stories are short and simple descriptions of what the customer would like to get out of a product. They are used to begin guiding the product owner and team in the development of the product.
A user story brings more indepth information to the dev team about how a feature of the application should be from a user's perspective
After watching this video, the biggest takeaway for me is that user stories are simple descriptions of a product feature that is written from the user or customer's perspective. In order to test user stories, acceptance criteria are made per user story in order to see what customer needs need to be satisfied by this specific user story.
A user story is a succinct description of a product feature from the user's POV.
thanks for sharing!
User stories are the foundation that value is derived from throughout the sprint.
A user story is a quick and simple way to get across the baseline of what the feature should be, be for, and include from the user's pov.
A user story is function from the end user perspective that the scrum team creates that benefits the end user.
As I understand it, a user story is a description of a product or feature from the user or stakeholder's point of view. It includes who is using it, what the feature is or the goal, and what value it brings. There are certain acceptance criteria that need to be met before a user story is completed.
The INVEST method makes it easy to take a concise idea to the team to explain who the product is for, what is its intended use and why it's going to bring value.
Do you have more examples of The C’s? the video is excellent.. thank you, guys.
To me, I think a user story is a way to effectively determine who users will be and what they truly want to do with the product.
A User Story, is a simple description of a product feature that captures the "who", "what", and "why". This is collected by the Product Owner and then shared with the development team where the can converse about the 3 C's and confirm their understanding. While confirming, they made add Acceptance Criteria.
User stories are mostly used to identify what a customer wants out of a product. It focuses on the who, what, and the why of customers expectations. With the INVEST it helps us understand who to create the perfect user story to help the rest of the team.
A User Story is a simple description of a product feature used to ensure the dev team can provide a useful product to the end user. By using the 3 C's and INVEST, a team can better create a useful product for the target audience, that allows that audience to accomplish their goal. Transparency with the product owner on what the team intends to do is key here.
Is it acceptable to also write test cases in a user story for reference?
A user story is a short scenario to describe a software goal or feature from the user's' point of view.
A user story is a simple demand from customers in simple words which the scrum team can use to create a product to supply the demand of the customer. As the story will give information about the user, need and the value of the product , scrum team may extract products guidelines and many different options in the form of acceptance criteria through card, conversation and confirmation.
User story is a short, simple, and informal written description of the product (software) from a user's perspective. It is for the team to understand what the user wants within the product.
User stories is the description of a product feature that is written from the end users POV. It entails WHO the user is, WHAT is their goal and WHY is it a story they will value.
Thanks for sharing!
The User stories are super important so we think of as many different points of view regarding our product. This, in turn will make the product an all-around success no matter the type of user.
User story is a simplified story of who what and why around the product for the end user.
The user story brings a more in-depth info to the whole team. A easier way to get feedback basically.
The who, what, why and the 3'C are key components to a user story
My understanding of a “user story” is that the “user stories” are simply another tool to help product owner develop products that meets the needs and wants of the users. (Marketing tool)
so, user story is a simple and concise discription of a product feature that is written from the point of view of the end user.
A user story is a conversation, not a requirements document, that facilitates a shared understanding of the customer's needs with the development team. User stories should include Who, What and Why as well as acceptance criteria.
thanks for sharing Tisa!
A user story is a breakdown of what user want in their products. As given in the example, the products owner and user want to log in or create an id using Facebook, Instagram. It is mentioned in the story and the developer used that story and code it and make a products/software to login using the Facebook, Instagram and social sites.Products owner gives the story of what they want in their products and the products are developed by a developer. QA test the products matching the user story and release final products to the product owner.
thanks for sharing!
Does the dev team write the user stories together? or is it typically one person?
Is there a common time frame, or specific amount of time that should be granted or designated to create a user story?
Writing a great user story consists of the three “C”’s: Card, Conversation, and Confirmation.
User Stories are great invitations for conversation.
Thanks for sharing!
If the Product Owner is creating the Acceptance Criteria, can some of these be denied during the confirmation? Are they re-written or removed completely until the next sprint?
Looks like you can use User Stories to quickly figure out more specifically what the end user wants from the product in development. Also, helps the team and PO establish goals and ways to achieve what the end user wants
Thanks for this point of view!
User stories include who (user), what (goal) and why (value/benefit) along with conditions (acceptance criteria) that must be executed successfully when tested, to satisfy customers' needs.
A user story is the description of the product feature from the user prospective. This is done by explaining the who what and why of the story.
A user story should be clear and concise.
Referencing who the user is, what the goal the user has, and why the goal is valuable.
Using the acronym “INVEST” to create the best understanding of every user story.
Assuming that the user story, for example is "As a ordering technician I want to see the orders submitted through the portal (GUI for sake of example) so that I can reduce duplicate orders", what is the best way to determine if the story is small enough to finish in a few days per the INVEST criteria? Would there be another step to consider aside from communicating with the team and product owner to identify story priorities?
INVEST stands for:
Independent
Negotiable
Valuable
Estimated
Sized
Testable
The INVEST acronym should be used to write great user stories.
In the beginning of a new large project, it has to be pretty overwhelming for a product owner to take a ton of feedback from end users. How do product owners actually communicate and connect with these end users, and how often are they asking for new ideas? Is this consistently taking place during the sprint review where stakeholders are allowed to join, or is the product owner randomly informed of new things that need to be added to the backlog?
The user story is developed to help the team understand who, what, why this particular section (need) of the software is being developed. What it's purpose is and what they customer is looking for the end product to be.
I understand that it's better to have independent user stories, but sometimes reality falls far from that, so what tis the best way to deal with situations where there are dependencies?
A user story is a simple description of a product feature written from the end user's point of view. Using both the 3 C's and INVEST can help reach a goal more effectively and efficiently.
User stories are used to create detail an actionable and executable piece of the project. These stories help guide the team to create something that will meet the acceptance criteria.
The user story is a effective, streamlined tool used by the dev team to ensure they're on the same page as the client and to help keep the dev team on task.
If one or more of the testable acceptance criteria receives a "Fail" then will the user story continue to the next sprint? Does it evolve over time?
User stories should address who the user is, what the user wants accomplished, and why the user wants that feature (what value does it bring?). Additionally, it should not depend on other user stories, should be negotiable (flexible, able to adapt), valuable to the user, estimatable in regards to what it will take to get it done, small, and testable with pass/fail results.
User story starts from a composition of the three C'’s: Card, Conversation, and Confirmation. Great user stores stores are determind by using the INVEST METHOD. Acceptance criteria is added to a user story to help bridge any gaps in between development and needs of customer defined by PO.
What are some good signs as an investor that I should invest in a particular user story I deem profitable?
User story is a basic explanation of the product's feature that is written from a customer's point of view by following the given user story format.
What is the most common method of writing these user stories? I've read that they're usually on post-it notes, index cards, or done on some sort of project management software. Is one method better or more effective/efficient than the other?
Hi Britni! There are pros and cons to both, and what works best for one team might not be what works best for a different team.
User stories are descriptions/explanations of a feature(e.g. Software) from a perspective of an end-user(customer)
The user story is an empathetic way to look at how to develop the product with the user at front of mind, focusing on who the user is, what they're trying to accomplish, and why they have that desired outcome.
A user story is an
explanation of a product feature written from a user's point of view. It should clearly describe the who, what and why to the dev team.
Thanks for sharing!
If a product owner always has 10 acceptable criteria in all of their stories, does getting them down to the best 7 help? What if they all relate and contribute to the story?
User story looks at product development with the end user in mind first.
user stories are what the user wants
A user story is a feature that is looked at from the view of the end user.
The INVEST anagram is simplifies the process of creating user stories and making it simple to understand.