She gave it a go. How many others could stand there in front of 6 people who does that for a living and in front of an audience and answer questions like that within one minute? Fine, there has been a few do it. I'd struggle answering those with a 20 second head start. Hat's off to her for giving it her best
I'd have either gone £30K for 3 chasers or £100K for 5, depending on how I was feeling. For 4 chasers (versus 3), the small difference in time advantage, plus an extra chaser, isn't worth only £20,000 more in my opinion. At that point you might as well go for 5.
With 29 left on the clock she would have struggled to get one of the lower offers anyway. Such a shame. My heart thumped for her, for sure. I was thinking before the timer started, no matter what happens, I have massive admiration for her choosing that option, and the Chasers and audience obviously respected that as well. This would have been such an incredible win though. Would have loved to see that.
The pressure is already high as is when she chose to face all six of them. The chasers saw this as a challenge as well - took less than 3 seconds to answer the first question, and less than 4 on average for subsequent questions (ones that were answered correctly, anyway.) The pressure on the girl probably multiplied itself by 500000x when she failed to answer the first time, and then another 500000x the second time. When she started shaking her head and smiled to herself she already knew she lost. I believe her train of thought was almost at "Mayflower" when she passed to save time. Still, major balls of titanium to take on six of them, knowing your chance of winning is probably slim to none. I would've taken the 40-second deal (best value, in my opinion).
she went for the gusto, props to her! first 20 seconds she did amazingly but would've needed to keep that pace throughout the whole round and essentially not get 1 wrong if she wanted to win, but I guess thats how it goes when theres 500k on the line, also going first definitely does not help. GG
Also I think once she did get one wrong, she dwelled on it and I think that threw her. I've noticed now, because time is so crucial if the answer doesn't come to you right away, just pass immediately and cut your losses don't waste time thinking, if you do get one wrong, let it go mentally and just focus on the next one don't let it throw you off.
I almost responded to some of the condescending-to-downright hateful comments below. Shame on me. She got a few really nasty questions. Her pace was good initially. Even with no advantage, her chances of winning were still relatively high - she doesn't have a team to get in her way, and she doesn't have a buzzer, those two things are HUGE. As has already been pointed out by others, her set was so bad she wouldn't have won with a lower offer anyway. Good on her for trying.
This isn’t Jess’ fault. It’s bad game design, not allowing for a time advantage on the super. Chasers probably would have offered 50 seconds or so. Still very tough, and Jess would have still lost, but that at least makes it seem theoretically possible.
I do believe this is the first and only time that a contestant has chosen to take on all 6 chasers. What’s also interesting to note is that there was another contestant who could’ve taken on all 6 but chose to take on 4 and he absolutely slaughtered them. He had about 30 seconds left on his clock so potentially, if he’d have taken on all 6… they might have won an even more incredible amount of money.
I'm pretty sure it isn't the first, and I think that person won, but I may be wrong on them winning. But for me it's more about the time than anything else. Sometimes the chasers get tripped up on BTC because they have to consider each other as opposed to when they're alone and can just say 'pass' if they're unsure. Sometimes people have won not because they played too well, but because of the time running out and the chasers getting a pop culture question none of them knew the answer to and waiting too long to answer. I think she would've won against 4, and maybe even 5
I wonder if Steven would have beaten 4 or more chaser’s, the only thing is the chaser’s might have known the answer’s to the 2 Paul got wrong and the 1 Darragh got wrong so I’m not sure if Steven would have won if there were more chaser’s he faced.
@@qasimhussain1678 hmm fair enough. Have you ever thought about the strategy you would deploy if you were on Beat The Chasers? What’s most important to you, the time, the money or the chasers?
It's not just a game of knowledge. Psychology plays a big part in this game! You give one wrong answer you have to brush it aside and focus on the next question! Like a psychopath with no emotions ~ ice cold !!
To all who call her greedy, yeah, hindsight is 20/20. I applaud her confidence. Let's see how many would call her greedy had she won. To all that say she should have gone for lower money, well... the chasers used 31 seconds, that's less than the lowest offer. Yes, some chasers wouldn't be able to answer, but it's not clear she would have won with any of those offers.
They play with an inherent time disad in addtion to having to- 1. Press the buzzer, and wait for the buzzer to call the person 2. Wait to see if anyone knows the answer to the question, if not them, instead of instantly passing These two things can waste a major amount of time, but admittedly in a no-pressure contest, you are right
@absolutebad3333 nothing semantic. You quoted (gave credit to) the wrong person. On a video you can watch again and check. And instead of apologizing and editing, you’re defending yourself. When you’re demonstrably wrong. Be better.
There are so many "you should've taken the lower offer instead of being greedy" comments that are entirely based on what the end result was, instead of taking the perspective of being there in the moment, before the actual decision is made. When you're there, you never know. Despite being superbrains, the chasers have a history of messing up big time in quite a few instances, and with the right questions at the right time, it's still doable. So while the lower offers may have changed the outcome, you cannot fault her for going for the 500K. Brilliant start if anything.
@@ArcienPlaysGames Sometimes taking a risk is worth it, especially with a life-changing amount of money. Sure, it may not always work out, but that doesn't mean it was the wrong decision in the moment.
It’s a very easy mistake to make, she was perhaps a little foolish in accepting the deal. You listen for keywords when you’re a quizzer, and 9/10 times you’ll see that the answer for a question relating to melanin is “skin”.
He’s right about her, both negative and positive. 60v60 is madness with how low the times on her other offers were. But she had absolute cojones of titanium to go for it.
I am sure someone will find this useful. Mark answer two questions, both correctly. Shaun answered one question correctly. Anne answered no questions. Paul answered one question incorrectly. Jenny answered three questions correctly. Darragh answered no questions.
1v3 then really. 30k to go for 3 with 20 more seconds. Take 20 off the chasers and she is still 9 seconds away. Could of gone for the 30 and probably won because of who the chasers were.
@@WTyrahcaZ In theory yes, but if it was different chasers they might’ve answered differently as there’s less of them. The chasers also may have made more mistakes as they would have been rushing to save more time.
Any contestant without a time advantage is always going to be up against it, because the contestant goes first - so assuming the average length of each question is the same on both sides, if the chasers get all theirs right then you're toast whatever you do. You really need an advantage of about 5 seconds just to counter the disadvantage of having to go first. 47 seconds would counter the disadvantage and then give you about a two question advantage, i.e. even if they get all theirs right you can afford to get two wrong and still win. So I'd probably have gone for the five chaser offer - £100k is still a lot of money but you have a MUCH better chance. Probably only a "professional" quizzer - Kevin Ashman or someone similar - would be able to take them all on with no time advantage and have a reasonable chance of winning.
They should make it so that the contestant's time doesn't start until Brad reads the first question, that should nullify the disadvantage of going first.
@@marcpower4167 A human reaction time to an audio stimulus is 0.17 seconds and it takes about 6 seconds for Brad to ask a question, to simplyfy this for you it would take about 18 questions each for the buzzing in to nullify the advantage of the chasers going second and in 60 seconds Brad only asks about 10 questions each
Pointless ever going for 6 chasers cos you need to get every question right plus hope chasers get at least 1 wrong otherwise you will run out of time first cos you get the first question.
The difference between 1 of 4 chasers knowing the answer and 1 of 6 chasers knowing the answer is minimal. However, you increase the chance of wrong person answers by a lot with 6 vs 4 and the Chasers know this, so they will be slightly more hesitant in answering.
In all game or quiz shows that involves answering questions. It is all about the odds, the right person being there answering the perfect questions that they happen to know answer for. So someone might have got all questions right and gone home with half a million quid. And someone else might have gone home empty handed etc. In theory it is a trap to lure you in with big money offers. But also as well on the on the other hand. U might as well have a go and take up that big money offer as contestants alway say your only here once
@@markn.7914 It's one typo moron, it isn't a grammar mistake they knew what they mean to type, and if you're gonna talk about grammar why didn't you use a full stop, a mistake using a computer isn't the same as writing, as you can't miswrite a letter, typos happen however.
not really even being greedy since if you walked in with nothing and you leave with nothing, then you've lost nothing. I'd rather go out in a blaze of glory
Come on it was worth a go with £500 million. A big gap between the top offer and the second highest offer. She’d have probably lost with the smaller offers aswell so she was right to go for it.
To be fair, even if she went for the 5000 pounds she still would've more than likely run out of time before the Chasers, she had a long string of incorrect answers which were ultimately her undoing.
@@markymark443 yeah I know I suppose your only there once. You have to be so clever to beat all 5 of them and get a tremendous amount of luck with the questions
The problem with this programme is most of the time the contestants don’t take the correct offer for them. They always go for more money or listen to their friends or don’t think things through properly. Thats what happened in this case.
@@jojobee42 Don't be stupid. Playing against 6 whilst going 1st actually puts you at a time disadvantage, which is the only thing other contestants usually have over the chasers.
@@rosscleary9110 The point of the person you mentioned still stand: "The chasers might mess up! You just don't know UNTIL you do it". See: hindsight bias
Heaven's sake. Whooping, cheering and a standing ovation? She failed. Miserably. After saying yeah i'll have a go at some free money. Isn't she brave? 😂 This is not a U.S show thank you
Hey Kevin, just wondering if you're thinking of going up there at all in the not-too-distant future? Seeing as you have such a big mouth, you should probably stick to offroading, it would appear that you share the same level of intelligence of people who enjoy that hobby 👍
@@CSRLaunchpad Hey Mr Pad. You're clearly very perceptive, well done for that. It's probably best you keep your wonderings to yourself, and perhaps mind your own business? Thanks for reaching out though.
@oore2696 >Comments publicly >Judges someone, a crowd of people >Judges contestant for failing while under pressure >Gets called out >"Mind your business" Buddy, are you okay? Or are you just miserable?
I can’t believe that this is the only episode of beat the chasers that’s for half a million why isn’t there been another episode of this like with of a man and he wins not being sexist she was just unlucky lol cause there’s been a couple if not a few episodes on deal or no deal with the jackpot at the hjghest being been for £500,000 now if they won that on there won that on here and went on who wants to be a millionaire sire they’d be be £2M rich/richer lol
Most shows in this format get insured for rare, high paying prizes that are unlikely to be won. It's budgeted in, but they don't need to pay out the full half a million, just the insurance premium for claiming it.
@@NameReveal-yy7qbEven during the normal show, the offers are fed to them. I have heard this somewhere on UA-cam and am sure it was from a reliable source
@@pgp519 perhaps mental like you for being on here to put a comment Still I feel very lucky to know another mental person, like yourself on here, thank you for making my day. Happy Christmas Oh! mental one
While she did lose, she is the only person currently who can claim that she took on 6 chasers, which is brave.
30 grand for a 20 second time advantage seemed good enough to me!
Yeah I'd have probably taken 3 chasers on for the £30k. Though I can see why someone would take on the super offer if given the chance!
@xxshadowgamer2 which is like I said a 20 second time advantage over the chasers
Id gone 4 chasers 5 is too hard
I would've went for 47 seconds she still might have won if she did
@@Ryan_GaffneyDoubt it, given the Chasers had 29 seconds to spare.
She gave it a go. How many others could stand there in front of 6 people who does that for a living and in front of an audience and answer questions like that within one minute? Fine, there has been a few do it. I'd struggle answering those with a 20 second head start. Hat's off to her for giving it her best
Anyone that bothers to apply for the show I imagine
I admired Jess's bravely because when I first saw this, I was quite shocked and surprised when she goes for it.
"Step aside" 😂😂 bro said i got this
Definitely earned my respect going for that large offer.
100k for 13 sec advantage is actually really good
Especially as The Beast would be omitted.
@@Isleofskye yeah
I'd have either gone £30K for 3 chasers or £100K for 5, depending on how I was feeling.
For 4 chasers (versus 3), the small difference in time advantage, plus an extra chaser, isn't worth only £20,000 more in my opinion. At that point you might as well go for 5.
Imagine taking on Britain's 6 biggest nerds for 500K with no advantage
Like she said, you only live once
I watched it
Never expected 13 likes and 3 repliea
Stupid boy 😅
@@johnbatch9276boy?
With 29 left on the clock she would have struggled to get one of the lower offers anyway. Such a shame. My heart thumped for her, for sure. I was thinking before the timer started, no matter what happens, I have massive admiration for her choosing that option, and the Chasers and audience obviously respected that as well. This would have been such an incredible win though. Would have loved to see that.
I've always wanted to see someone go for the full house of six chasers. Really great effort Jess 🎉
Jess is wonderful. Love her grace under pressure.
30,000 at 40 seconds is what I would've gone for. Could sort out so many of my issues and I'm confident I'd actually win it.
Personally I'd have gone for the £100K. Half a mil would be nice but 60 seconds is very tight!
The pressure is already high as is when she chose to face all six of them. The chasers saw this as a challenge as well - took less than 3 seconds to answer the first question, and less than 4 on average for subsequent questions (ones that were answered correctly, anyway.) The pressure on the girl probably multiplied itself by 500000x when she failed to answer the first time, and then another 500000x the second time. When she started shaking her head and smiled to herself she already knew she lost. I believe her train of thought was almost at "Mayflower" when she passed to save time.
Still, major balls of titanium to take on six of them, knowing your chance of winning is probably slim to none. I would've taken the 40-second deal (best value, in my opinion).
Thanks for posting Beat the Chasers!
she went for the gusto, props to her! first 20 seconds she did amazingly but would've needed to keep that pace throughout the whole round and essentially not get 1 wrong if she wanted to win, but I guess thats how it goes when theres 500k on the line, also going first definitely does not help. GG
Also I think once she did get one wrong, she dwelled on it and I think that threw her. I've noticed now, because time is so crucial if the answer doesn't come to you right away, just pass immediately and cut your losses don't waste time thinking, if you do get one wrong, let it go mentally and just focus on the next one don't let it throw you off.
2:11
Jess: "You know what? No guts no glory. Let's go for it let's go full beans Brad take them all on!"
Chasers:
😙 🙇🏾♂️ ☺️ 🤦🏻♂️ 😲 🤔
I'd go for 5 Chasers for $100,000 with a 60 - 47 Clock 13 seconds time advantage.
I almost responded to some of the condescending-to-downright hateful comments below. Shame on me.
She got a few really nasty questions. Her pace was good initially. Even with no advantage, her chances of winning were still relatively high - she doesn't have a team to get in her way, and she doesn't have a buzzer, those two things are HUGE. As has already been pointed out by others, her set was so bad she wouldn't have won with a lower offer anyway. Good on her for trying.
yea ur not wrong wtf is with the people
This isn’t Jess’ fault. It’s bad game design, not allowing for a time advantage on the super. Chasers probably would have offered 50 seconds or so. Still very tough, and Jess would have still lost, but that at least makes it seem theoretically possible.
I do believe this is the first and only time that a contestant has chosen to take on all 6 chasers. What’s also interesting to note is that there was another contestant who could’ve taken on all 6 but chose to take on 4 and he absolutely slaughtered them. He had about 30 seconds left on his clock so potentially, if he’d have taken on all 6… they might have won an even more incredible amount of money.
I'm pretty sure it isn't the first, and I think that person won, but I may be wrong on them winning. But for me it's more about the time than anything else. Sometimes the chasers get tripped up on BTC because they have to consider each other as opposed to when they're alone and can just say 'pass' if they're unsure. Sometimes people have won not because they played too well, but because of the time running out and the chasers getting a pop culture question none of them knew the answer to and waiting too long to answer. I think she would've won against 4, and maybe even 5
I know Steven got all 5 questions and was offered $500K but went for 3 chasers for $25,000.
@@lonewolfx499 that might be the wrong I was thinking of. I’m sorry for being stupid.
I wonder if Steven would have beaten 4 or more chaser’s, the only thing is the chaser’s might have known the answer’s to the 2 Paul got wrong and the 1 Darragh got wrong so I’m not sure if Steven would have won if there were more chaser’s he faced.
@@qasimhussain1678 hmm fair enough. Have you ever thought about the strategy you would deploy if you were on Beat The Chasers? What’s most important to you, the time, the money or the chasers?
It's not just a game of knowledge. Psychology plays a big part in this game! You give one wrong answer you have to brush it aside and focus on the next question! Like a psychopath with no emotions ~ ice cold !!
Good for her ! She probably calculated she wouldn’t win but had a go anyway, so maybe it’s not just greed .
3.46 world class answer by the dark destroyer. Won the game for the chasers imo
mark is literally buzzing in as well
They won by 29 secs.... I don't think that one question made a difference.....
@@thomassf3dunno man such a niche question that kept the momentum in their favour. We’ll never know for sure but I think that was a pivotal moment
Why should the contestant have to answer first? Disadvantage straight away.
The chasers have to buzz in and be called on though, I think that makes up for it.
@@marcpower4167the opposite version of the chase but still it can still be annoying though lol yes what playing for was good though lol yes lol
They’re offering a chance to win money; they make the rules. Don’t like it? Don’t play.
To all who call her greedy, yeah, hindsight is 20/20. I applaud her confidence. Let's see how many would call her greedy had she won.
To all that say she should have gone for lower money, well... the chasers used 31 seconds, that's less than the lowest offer. Yes, some chasers wouldn't be able to answer, but it's not clear she would have won with any of those offers.
Going down in glory. Like her self-confidence. What a nice person as well
In short to play for half a million you`d be facing Aristotle - arguably the last man on earth to know practically everything there is to know.
4:37 Darragh's face when he knows that question is for him 😂😂😂
No guts, no glory, no money 😮
Fair play to her for going for it, she may even end up being the only player ever who had the guts to take on all 6!
多くの観客に囲まれながら、たった一人で6人のチェイサーと戦うのは大変なプレッシャーだと思います。彼女のその勇気に拍手👏
You wouldn’t beat an average pub quiz team in a 6v1, let alone when you’re against some of the best quizzers in the UK.
They play with an inherent time disad in addtion to having to-
1. Press the buzzer, and wait for the buzzer to call the person
2. Wait to see if anyone knows the answer to the question, if not them, instead of instantly passing
These two things can waste a major amount of time, but admittedly in a no-pressure contest, you are right
Maybe they should invite Kevin from eggheads on as a celebrity contestant. Maybe he could win the 500k.
@@-mattm would love to see that! The man knows everything!
@@him050 Problem is would he be quick enough to answer at speed. We know Anne is a top chaser but she seems very redundant on Beat the chasers.
@-mattm Kevin can be quick if he wants to be, he holds the record for the highest ever Mastermind score
I get the feeling Mark was only told 500,000 through his ear piece or monitor as he said it based on his own reaction.
1:42, errr what do you mean, very confused 😕🤔🤔🤔, don't know what explanation I can give you mate?
@@southernboi8154 don’t think you meant to ask me that.
@misstrussteLgbTq what are you talking about ear piece, monitor thing he just said the offer normally right?
The chasers don’t have earpieces. Mark was just being himself.
@@jamesnimarko1439 of course they have earpieces. This is television.
13 second advantage for a hundred grand was a good offer. She got greedy
Jess was unlucky though. After that first wrong answer, every question after that was tough
I don’t care what anyone says. You could never convince me NOT to take the highest offers possible. Like dark destroyer said. No guts no glory
he was just quoting what the contestant just said lol
@@davidz2690 ok?? How does that change anything of what I said
@@absolutebad3333 because no one says "Like ___ said" if they're quoting someone lol
@@Hazetal semantic police over here… who cares does it take away from the point of what I said?
@absolutebad3333 nothing semantic. You quoted (gave credit to) the wrong person. On a video you can watch again and check. And instead of apologizing and editing, you’re defending yourself. When you’re demonstrably wrong. Be better.
I can't blame her for taking that offer, how often do you get a chance to win half a million? Thanks for the upload, these are always fun to watch.
You came with nothing and while you could leave with nothing, why not take the chance to change your life forever?
@@thesmithersy Exactly. Like she could have probably won the 5k, which would be nice, but wouldn't really change anything.
@@RisingSunReviews Having 100k would make a difference as well but the pressure might have been lower.
There are so many "you should've taken the lower offer instead of being greedy" comments that are entirely based on what the end result was, instead of taking the perspective of being there in the moment, before the actual decision is made. When you're there, you never know. Despite being superbrains, the chasers have a history of messing up big time in quite a few instances, and with the right questions at the right time, it's still doable. So while the lower offers may have changed the outcome, you cannot fault her for going for the 500K. Brilliant start if anything.
@@ArcienPlaysGames Sometimes taking a risk is worth it, especially with a life-changing amount of money. Sure, it may not always work out, but that doesn't mean it was the wrong decision in the moment.
I would have also tried £500,000. You never know.
Yeah agreed. Sometimes on the normal chase I’m sure they go easy on them and essentially let them win.
OMG the offer from the beast was huge 😲500k
I kind of doubt even James holzhauer or Ken Jennings could beat this kind of challenge
I would love to see beat the chasers repeat on challenge TV at some point and she try very best to try beat all 6 chasers
Ballsy, but she did get the 5 questions in the builder
Paul calls her a fool after saying Skin for "Neuro"melanin hahahahahah
The best thing about it is that he is a doctor
It’s a very easy mistake to make, she was perhaps a little foolish in accepting the deal.
You listen for keywords when you’re a quizzer, and 9/10 times you’ll see that the answer for a question relating to melanin is “skin”.
Well melanin is constantly related with skin so it wasn't exactly a howler was it?
He’s right about her, both negative and positive. 60v60 is madness with how low the times on her other offers were. But she had absolute cojones of titanium to go for it.
She played well but it was nerves.
Thank you so much, that was so beautiful.
Knew it was Mark who tempted her, of course
I am sure someone will find this useful.
Mark answer two questions, both correctly.
Shaun answered one question correctly.
Anne answered no questions.
Paul answered one question incorrectly.
Jenny answered three questions correctly.
Darragh answered no questions.
1v3 then really. 30k to go for 3 with 20 more seconds. Take 20 off the chasers and she is still 9 seconds away. Could of gone for the 30 and probably won because of who the chasers were.
@@WTyrahcaZ In theory yes, but if it was different chasers they might’ve answered differently as there’s less of them. The chasers also may have made more mistakes as they would have been rushing to save more time.
Thats impossible to beat all 6 chasers to win 500.000 pounds in full 60 seconds!
nothing is impossible
no one said winning HALF A MILLION POUNDS was supposed to be easy :)
Only if the chasers trip up and you don't
And i Said Thats F**ng Impossible to do it
@@Captainalexstars94er Not really if the host asks you every question that you know
I love how it said £0 with 5 seconds before she actually lost it. 😂
😂😂😂
“Step aside”🤣
I love Bradley I think he's absolutely brilliant
Any contestant without a time advantage is always going to be up against it, because the contestant goes first - so assuming the average length of each question is the same on both sides, if the chasers get all theirs right then you're toast whatever you do. You really need an advantage of about 5 seconds just to counter the disadvantage of having to go first. 47 seconds would counter the disadvantage and then give you about a two question advantage, i.e. even if they get all theirs right you can afford to get two wrong and still win. So I'd probably have gone for the five chaser offer - £100k is still a lot of money but you have a MUCH better chance. Probably only a "professional" quizzer - Kevin Ashman or someone similar - would be able to take them all on with no time advantage and have a reasonable chance of winning.
Agreed. Thats why the time advantage is so important.
They should flip a coin to decide who goes first when there's no time advantage.
They should make it so that the contestant's time doesn't start until Brad reads the first question, that should nullify the disadvantage of going first.
What about the fact the chasers have to buzz in and be called on, that takes a second or two, isn't that enough to nullify it?
@@marcpower4167 A human reaction time to an audio stimulus is 0.17 seconds and it takes about 6 seconds for Brad to ask a question, to simplyfy this for you it would take about 18 questions each for the buzzing in to nullify the advantage of the chasers going second and in 60 seconds Brad only asks about 10 questions each
Very Brave But One Question Tripped Her Up And The Game Was Over
Plus When It Had 1 Second Left The Amount Was Already £0 And The Chasers Question Too
Yeah, I’ve seen that happen on a previous series. It’s quite strange.
Dang girl got balls
It looks flat enough to me 😊
Anne just awesome yet again
This is what happens when the Chasers dominate
I watched hoping she had won it! How disappointing 😮
Me too! I was hoping she would win the $500,000 as well! That’s why I watched the video because it sounds exciting
Could have been for 10mil but she never gonna beat all 6 with the same time is she lool
Could you with your bum juice?
2:18
2:21
2:26
2:29
1:34
she tried
44 for 50k Perfect
So sad she lost £500,000. Good try tho
Wheres the full episode
The full episode will be on ITVX. Series 4, episode 4.
All 6 having a full 60 seconds is too much of an advantage for them. Should’ve only been another 3 seconds for 50.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Seen this start. Surely not ????
Well that's why they award half a million!
but she gets half a million if she wins
She would have won a lot of money, more money than 99.9% of uk game show contestants will ever be offered
Pointless ever going for 6 chasers cos you need to get every question right plus hope chasers get at least 1 wrong otherwise you will run out of time first cos you get the first question.
The difference between 1 of 4 chasers knowing the answer and 1 of 6 chasers knowing the answer is minimal. However, you increase the chance of wrong person answers by a lot with 6 vs 4 and the Chasers know this, so they will be slightly more hesitant in answering.
Thats why it's half a million
Well, that was close 😆
I honestly really seriously do not get why there hasn’t been another episode where a contestant plays for this much and instead actually wins it 😢😢
Because they have no interest in losing all this money
They have to get 5 questions right in the cash builder first, I’ve never seen anyone else get 5 right before
In all game or quiz shows that involves answering questions. It is all about the odds, the right person being there answering the perfect questions that they happen to know answer for. So someone might have got all questions right and gone home with half a million quid. And someone else might have gone home empty handed etc. In theory it is a trap to lure you in with big money offers. But also as well on the on the other hand. U might as well have a go and take up that big money offer as contestants alway say your only here once
Hold on how is this Series 4 when Darragh is a chaser.
Darragh joined Beat The Chasers in series 3 when Paul was ill. Series 4 was recorded in summer 2021.
Some mudders do have em
All the chasers look fucking missrable
miserable*
I don't think you can really talk shit with that grammar mate
@@markn.7914 It's one typo moron, it isn't a grammar mistake they knew what they mean to type, and if you're gonna talk about grammar why didn't you use a full stop, a mistake using a computer isn't the same as writing, as you can't miswrite a letter, typos happen however.
@@bobbob6978 Ohhhh, someone's in a mood, oh! Talk about a mood!
how?
Those questions were hard for her you little cheat
They weren't that hard. I knew half of them. It's the time pressure of being under.a timer.
@@darrenpimlottSo you didn't know half of them, then? Do you think you win if you don't know half of them ...
I’d be happy with 5k
I think if someone got all 6 ?'s right, if they beat the chasers they get £500,000 if the chasers beat them they still get £250,000
No, they leave with nothing if their clock runs out before the chasers’.
what sense would that make LMAO
Not 500,000 to bigger
She'd of got 30k if she wasn't so greedy
No she wouldn't. She wasn't quick enough.
not really even being greedy since if you walked in with nothing and you leave with nothing, then you've lost nothing. I'd rather go out in a blaze of glory
go big or go home
5:05 Lose
Silly Girl, She would have easy won 30k with 20secs time advantage
Greed won again.
Come on it was worth a go with £500 million. A big gap between the top offer and the second highest offer. She’d have probably lost with the smaller offers aswell so she was right to go for it.
Gambling can sometimes be a good thing
Greedy got the better of her plus she the questions weren’t the best for her. Pressure she really should have thought about this
To be fair, even if she went for the 5000 pounds she still would've more than likely run out of time before the Chasers, she had a long string of incorrect answers which were ultimately her undoing.
@@markymark443 yeah I know I suppose your only there once. You have to be so clever to beat all 5 of them and get a tremendous amount of luck with the questions
The problem with this programme is most of the time the contestants don’t take the correct offer for them. They always go for more money or listen to their friends or don’t think things through properly. Thats what happened in this case.
@@DAN44100 I agree
That was such a a ridiculous decision
You never know the outcome.. The chasers might mess up! You just don't know UNTIL you do it.
In hindsight maybe, but you never know in the moment.
@@jojobee42 Don't be stupid. Playing against 6 whilst going 1st actually puts you at a time disadvantage, which is the only thing other contestants usually have over the chasers.
@@rosscleary9110 The point of the person you mentioned still stand: "The chasers might mess up! You just don't know UNTIL you do it". See: hindsight bias
@@rosscleary9110why does going first put you at a time disadvantage?
Pointless video when it wasn't even close
Heaven's sake. Whooping, cheering and a standing ovation? She failed. Miserably. After saying yeah i'll have a go at some free money. Isn't she brave? 😂 This is not a U.S show thank you
Hey Kevin, just wondering if you're thinking of going up there at all in the not-too-distant future? Seeing as you have such a big mouth, you should probably stick to offroading, it would appear that you share the same level of intelligence of people who enjoy that hobby 👍
@@CSRLaunchpad Hey Mr Pad. You're clearly very perceptive, well done for that. It's probably best you keep your wonderings to yourself, and perhaps mind your own business? Thanks for reaching out though.
@@kktomm A friendly suggestion then, please watch more of Beat the Chasers and you'll see how many people really go for 6. Have a good day.
@kevinmoore2696 you're an absolute massive disgrace to Kevin's. Ya big hill
@oore2696
>Comments publicly
>Judges someone, a crowd of people
>Judges contestant for failing while under pressure
>Gets called out
>"Mind your business"
Buddy, are you okay? Or are you just miserable?
Skill Issue
I can’t believe that this is the only episode of beat the chasers that’s for half a million why isn’t there been another episode of this like with of a man and he wins not being sexist she was just unlucky lol cause there’s been a couple if not a few episodes on deal or no deal with the jackpot at the hjghest being been for £500,000 now if they won that on there won that on here and went on who wants to be a millionaire sire they’d be be £2M rich/richer lol
What's her gender got to do with anything
Jesus fucking Christ learn how to use punctuation. Your comment is unreadable you illiterate waste of oxygen.
so bad
500k... obviously the show doesn't have the budget for it.
Most shows in this format get insured for rare, high paying prizes that are unlikely to be won. It's budgeted in, but they don't need to pay out the full half a million, just the insurance premium for claiming it.
The beast has an earpiece telling him the offer
Well they would of had the budget for it if she won. They'd have to pay her if she won
No one would beat the six of them on equal footing.
@@NameReveal-yy7qbEven during the normal show, the offers are fed to them. I have heard this somewhere on UA-cam and am sure it was from a reliable source
She was being greedy Yes I am judgmental
Perhaps just mental, for commenting on a quiz show video twice 5 days apart
@@pgp519 perhaps mental like you for being on here to put a comment Still I feel very lucky to know another mental person, like yourself on here, thank you for making my day. Happy Christmas Oh! mental one
@paulahowse6543 indeed same here, happy Christmas, I hope we can watch the chase together whilst chucking down a can of roast dinner
Deserved to lose for being GREEDY!
Or she wanted to have fun and an enjoyable experience. Imagine being this judgmental.