Top 5 4-Seater Single-Engine Piston Airplanes | Price & Specs

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @AviationFederation
    @AviationFederation  4 роки тому +9

    *What do you think of these single-engine piston airplanes? Which one is your favorite? Let me know down below! To watch more interesting aircraft videos, check these out:*
    Top 5 Cessna Citation Jets | 2021-2022
    ua-cam.com/video/4SuD_ZWouH8/v-deo.html
    Top 5 Cheapest Private Jets | 2021-2022
    ua-cam.com/video/MOtWK35dgFM/v-deo.html&t
    Top 5 Cheapest Turboprops | 2021-2022
    ua-cam.com/video/G7n1-3KgOuo/v-deo.html

    • @karlossargeant3872
      @karlossargeant3872 3 роки тому

      Hi Sophie I Love these Videos on Airplanes & Helicopters is Awesome keep going!!!!!!

    • @peterlo5900
      @peterlo5900 2 роки тому

      I'm gonna by one tomorrow 🤪

  • @zeffmetu
    @zeffmetu 3 роки тому +3

    c172s are the workhorses of training industry. In love with those birds

  • @zerogravityaviation
    @zerogravityaviation 3 роки тому +17

    I think my favorite would be the Diamond 40NG . I love the concept of single lever and not to have to worry about adjusting mixtures. Also it’s very economic because the used fuel for it is JET A-1 which is highly cheaper than 100LL what I use now on my pa28

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  3 роки тому +4

      That’s an interesting point. Thank you for watching and the great comment!

    • @christianfensbo6980
      @christianfensbo6980 2 роки тому +3

      Totally agree - I schooled in a DA40 and now that I fly C172 and Bristell BR23 I still can't get the DA 40 out of my head.

    • @L3nny666
      @L3nny666 2 роки тому +1

      plus it just looks so good.

  • @In20xx
    @In20xx 2 роки тому +2

    This helps with my research so much, thanks for making!

  • @henrikwilcox3703
    @henrikwilcox3703 2 роки тому +2

    I think your selection for the Top 4-Seater Single-Engine Piston Airplanes is spot on perfect in every category. I really enjoy your video's. Keep up the excellent work that you're doing! Thank you!

  • @wheelsandwings7535
    @wheelsandwings7535 3 роки тому +12

    Great choice but give me the DA40 over the Cirrus every time. 👍

  • @cecilwhiting125
    @cecilwhiting125 3 роки тому +9

    Thinking Most of us real aviation folks rather hear Spec, ( wt., V-no, T.O.-dist) rather than corporate history and background music. Why the order of favorites (the reasoning) 😕

    • @tonyneel7908
      @tonyneel7908 Рік тому

      Legit. You should make that video I would definitely watch

  • @Fynnley525
    @Fynnley525 2 роки тому +1

    Hey i know the plane in the thumbnail, N695DS is part of the flying club near me, i see it all the time

  • @alexandrefrossardnogueira3894
    @alexandrefrossardnogueira3894 3 роки тому +3

    Great vid! Try gathering your top 5 picks for Experimental, single engine, 4 seater eirplanes. There are some great toys to look for!

  • @josephcwallace
    @josephcwallace 3 роки тому +20

    The price info is useful to know.....it would also be good to know the comparative useful load, range, and top speeds

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  3 роки тому +4

      Thanks for the feedback! Missed putting those in the video but please check out the description box for more info!

    • @alexdarcydestsimon3767
      @alexdarcydestsimon3767 2 роки тому

      Can't say better.

  • @douglasvarela1065
    @douglasvarela1065 3 роки тому +1

    Your channel is great. Congratulations.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  3 роки тому

      Thank you very much! I'm working on some more improvements.

  • @pilotkaps4562
    @pilotkaps4562 2 роки тому +2

    Excellent 👍 I like it 😉😉😉

  • @clarencehopkins7832
    @clarencehopkins7832 2 роки тому

    Excellent stuff

  • @jimydoolittle3129
    @jimydoolittle3129 3 роки тому +2

    RV10 is the best 4 seater ❤️✈️

  • @gregoryhill7960
    @gregoryhill7960 2 роки тому

    👍 👌 I like the Cirrus SR 20_ SR22 series . But I enjoyed all five of your selections

  • @johannjohann6523
    @johannjohann6523 Рік тому

    good video and information. Thanks for sharing. Glad to see carbon fiber being offered on small private aircraft. I would think that should help structural stability without adding weight.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Рік тому

      We're glad you found the video informative! Carbon fiber indeed offers a great balance of strength and lightness. Are there any other advancements in aircraft materials or technologies that particularly interest you?

  • @lawrencestark8983
    @lawrencestark8983 2 роки тому

    Beautiful planes but I can't buy a new plane at those prices. Very good video thank you

  • @joeystories6946
    @joeystories6946 3 роки тому +3

    The parachute system is light years ahead. Thank you CIRRUS

  • @charlieseldon6202
    @charlieseldon6202 Рік тому

    What about the Sling TSI?.

  • @DavidGienger
    @DavidGienger 8 місяців тому

    Enjoyed the video, but would have liked the specifications like you did on a previous video on the lightweight 2 seater sport planes. The speed, distance, weight of plane. And maximum carry capacity with baggage square feet. Thanks for the enjoyable video’s.
    Sincerely, David Gienger

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  8 місяців тому

      Thank you so much for the kind feedback. We'll do our best to bring more useful and informative content.

  • @jtflypegasus
    @jtflypegasus 2 роки тому +2

    I think Cessna 182 was left out on your list (inadvertently).

  • @pavelruzicka3491
    @pavelruzicka3491 3 роки тому

    Simply wonderful

  • @waynelagasse9914
    @waynelagasse9914 3 роки тому +7

    Pipistrel Panthera

    • @speedomars
      @speedomars 3 роки тому

      The Panthera is a non-starter.

  • @charlymark7
    @charlymark7 3 роки тому +4

    Where are the Piper aircraft

    • @acratone8300
      @acratone8300 3 роки тому

      They're at the bottom of the bay...
      ua-cam.com/video/2u2Dggrb6dE/v-deo.html

  • @philipgledhill7227
    @philipgledhill7227 3 роки тому +2

    Philip likes the cirrus special edition 8000.
    Philip is going to have a look at the Mooney on UA-cam I have not seen this airoplane before top five planes are brilliant philip.

  • @SpatialGuy77
    @SpatialGuy77 2 роки тому +3

    G’day, I like your videos. With this one the background company information was good but at lease cruise speed and range would have been even more interesting. Would have saved me 25min looking up the specs on each 😁
    Cheers 🍻

  • @terryflint7557
    @terryflint7557 Рік тому

    Would have been nice to know cruising speed and range of each.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Рік тому

      Absolutely, understanding the cruising speed and range is crucial when evaluating single-engine piston aircraft. We'll do our best to provide this in future content. Which specific model or category are you interested in knowing more about?

  • @roymayhew6250
    @roymayhew6250 2 роки тому +1

    Hey , look at this , I am the one who missed one thing , let us assume in emergency situation , and parachutes open to land safely , and the plane is at 4000 ft. in elevation , Ahhhhh ! now I am safe , and the pilot looks down , and thinks "no , no way , not the power plant " or it could be " no , not the power line". so you see I even miss things . hang glider method is better way and safer.

  • @changbou1093
    @changbou1093 2 роки тому

    ThAnk you.

  • @G-Force_70
    @G-Force_70 4 місяці тому

    Great choices especially the Diamond DA40, but you don't include engine specs, power or flight ranges

  • @jamesbarrick3403
    @jamesbarrick3403 Рік тому

    I'm not a pilot but I love following aviation. I will be a pilot soon. I do love studying all of the performance specs of different designs and learning what I like or not. I wish all of the producers would include one simple stat for their planes - the coefficient of drag. I want a slippery plane. We all want this. One simple number will tell us where we are at. Why do they not do this?

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Рік тому

      It's great to hear about your passion for aviation! The coefficient of drag is indeed an important factor in aircraft performance, as it directly affects the aerodynamic efficiency and fuel consumption. While manufacturers often provide detailed information about an aircraft's aerodynamic features, including wing design and other performance characteristics, the coefficient of drag may not be explicitly listed as a single number in marketing materials or specifications. As the aviation industry continues to advance, it's possible that manufacturers may include more comprehensive aerodynamic data in the future, considering the growing interest in fuel efficiency and environmental sustainability.

  • @gilbertdrui2134
    @gilbertdrui2134 3 роки тому +4

    What about the longest ever in production single and still produced, the Beech Bonanza ?

    • @rexr3306
      @rexr3306 3 роки тому

      Thats a six seater. The video is top 5 4 seater single engines

    • @speedomars
      @speedomars 3 роки тому

      The Bonanza is an antique design. Sells few.

    • @gilbertdrui2134
      @gilbertdrui2134 3 роки тому

      @@speedomars Your comment would be valid if the video didn't mention the C172 and the Mooney which are both antiquated by your standards, especially the C172.

  • @MegaPierre88
    @MegaPierre88 6 місяців тому

    Theyre very good selections. Awesome😊

  • @gammaraider
    @gammaraider 3 роки тому +1

    That interior of the Cirrus is just gorgeous. Completely different league from what i've flown so far. and combined with that emergency chute system, this one would be right on the top of my wish list.

  • @andrewsampson9952
    @andrewsampson9952 10 місяців тому

    Check out the Pipistrel Panthera

  • @peterwilliamson8721
    @peterwilliamson8721 3 роки тому

    Great choic3s

  • @speedomars
    @speedomars 3 роки тому +3

    The top piston aircraft continues to be the Cirrus SR20, SR22 and SR22T. How do we know? They sell more than all other aircraft COMBINED. And Mooney is out of business, btw.

  • @reedr1659
    @reedr1659 3 роки тому

    It's amazing any new aircraft are built and sold considering what a new "entry level" plane costs.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  3 роки тому

      The private aircraft industry is actually experiencing a boom this year and couldn’t even keep up with the growing demand.

    • @2Greenlid
      @2Greenlid 3 роки тому

      If you look at the wealth the stock market has created you would not be surprised, 20% returns make a lot of people wealthy!

  • @zachadams6666
    @zachadams6666 2 роки тому

    What’s the plane at :14 seconds in??

  • @creativityworld6781
    @creativityworld6781 3 роки тому +2

    you missed panthera aircraft the coolest one

  • @processingbenefitsbt6306
    @processingbenefitsbt6306 3 роки тому

    Amazing ariplan I need ..

  • @archiemilagan383
    @archiemilagan383 3 роки тому

    Nice one. Chutes should be standard now for all planes.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  3 роки тому

      Definitely agree! At least for small ones

    • @mauriceevans6546
      @mauriceevans6546 3 роки тому

      Most BRS parachutes are optional on most aircraft and standard on cirrus. They take away from useful load on small aircraft and this can be a factor in the decision to install by the customer. Some pilots don't think they need it.

  • @danielepelaia7875
    @danielepelaia7875 3 роки тому +1

    Cirus used 4 seater a little over 175.000 grand parachute cool avonics with quarterly keyboard and synthetic vision

  • @AllenPortman
    @AllenPortman Рік тому +1

    I was considering getting back into flying and possibly owning a plane but it seems the prices of GA planes have gotten completely beyond what the common working or retired person can afford. Maybe one day if I inherit some unknown fortune!

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Рік тому

      Indeed, the costs of general aviation planes have become quite substantial. If you do decide to pursue it in the future, there are still options like flying clubs, partnerships, or more budget-friendly aircraft that can make it more accessible. Until then, you can always enjoy aviation from the ground and keep the dream alive! Is there a specific aircraft you've always dreamed of owning, even if it's just a wish for the future?

  • @Abofahad20
    @Abofahad20 2 роки тому +1

    How much is plane number 1?

  • @christopherhand4836
    @christopherhand4836 3 роки тому +3

    I thought you were gonna tell us your fav

  • @Friend-of-Oil-and-Gas
    @Friend-of-Oil-and-Gas Рік тому

    I was thinking they would average around 200k. But I guess I can’t be surprised when a new pickup truck cost 80-120k.

  • @BrianRhodes9763
    @BrianRhodes9763 3 роки тому +2

    I will have to go with the Diamond DA40, there is something about that T-tail

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  3 роки тому

      Thought so too!

    • @MajorCaliber
      @MajorCaliber 3 роки тому +2

      Not to mention the super low stall speed, and consequent great safety record.

  • @stanislavturanov895
    @stanislavturanov895 3 роки тому

    what about RV10?

  • @khangvutien2538
    @khangvutien2538 3 роки тому

    I’m surprised to see the C175 in this list. In this new version, do you know how many fuel drain points *per wing* this plane has?!!!

  • @CyrilDeretz
    @CyrilDeretz 2 роки тому

    I would have included the legendary Beechcraft Bonanza into this list. Surprisingly no Piper aircraft either

  • @dirkdiggler3009
    @dirkdiggler3009 2 роки тому +1

    In 1970 a new Cessna 172 was $12,500. There is nothing about todays prices that make sense. A dying industry that has outpriced itself.

  • @tennisdude2004
    @tennisdude2004 3 роки тому

    “With over 6,000 sold” shows the cirrus special edition 7,000 in most of the video clips 😂

  • @benh2134
    @benh2134 2 роки тому

    Interesting competition has developed over the years in the experimental category. Worth considering when thi king to purchase. Downside potentially is that one must build the plane. Likely a deal breaker for most.

  • @sparkyspace
    @sparkyspace 2 роки тому

    Isn’t it amazing how almost all of these planes in your top five I built in America yet 100+ other countries in the world didn’t make the top five

  • @overqed
    @overqed 3 роки тому

    Mine is the Cirrus SR22.

  • @gregoryhill7960
    @gregoryhill7960 2 роки тому

    P.s Cirrus SR M SR22 series

  • @axelgerber6298
    @axelgerber6298 Рік тому

    The Cessna 206 Turbo

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Рік тому

      The Cessna 206 Turbo is a great choice although not in this list! It offers powerful performance and versatility, making it suitable for various missions. Whether it's for personal use, charter operations, or utility purposes, the Cessna 206 Turbo is known for its reliability and capability.

  • @elvis-6250
    @elvis-6250 3 роки тому

    I'm surprised of the prices of this planes. 40 years earlier I readed the prices of planes in this category, they were a little part of the prices today. But there are offers of used planes with prices lower than 40.000 $.

  • @chriskamen2152
    @chriskamen2152 2 роки тому

    no TB20 Trinidad? oh wait they don't make it anymore :(

  • @mkaplan114
    @mkaplan114 10 місяців тому

    My favorite would be the TECNAM 2010 . Best flying regards from Stuttgart❤💙🤍

  • @ddt77ta
    @ddt77ta Рік тому

    Don’t get the reason why the cirrus sr22 should be better than the diamond d40….

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Рік тому

      Both the Cirrus SR22 and Diamond DA40 have their strengths, but preferences can vary based on individual needs and priorities. It's all about finding the right fit for your flying style and requirements.

  • @stevenslachta9523
    @stevenslachta9523 3 роки тому +6

    They are too expensive.

    • @mattivirta
      @mattivirta 2 роки тому +1

      sure, ower price all, used can buy 30k-55k ewerywere in USA same cost europe 50k-70k

  • @jaimehidalgo3742
    @jaimehidalgo3742 2 роки тому

    comparing the rs-22 with 180hp GA is tricky, then you must compare it with a c-182 and the da50, and Caps is just a bad solution for a bad design that could not pass spin recovery certification...

  • @brycecampbell4845
    @brycecampbell4845 Рік тому

    182 cessna

  • @ThomasAfterHoursASMR
    @ThomasAfterHoursASMR 4 місяці тому

    I went to an air show today and seen a brand new cirrus sr22 in blue and I gota say, I have zero roots in flying and zero interest in aviation and after looking at that plane up close and being told it’s pressurized, turbo charged, can fly at over 25000 feet and can go from western Pennsylvania to Florida quick
    😂 I gota up my game

  • @StevenHunter-k1i
    @StevenHunter-k1i Рік тому

    Where does one fly one of these planes? Seems like a short distance/few occupant toy.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Рік тому

      Single-engine piston airplanes, including 4-seaters, are versatile and can be used for various purposes. They are often used for personal and recreational flying, flight training, short-distance trips, and even some business travel. Depending on your location and aviation interests, you can fly them from local airports, private airstrips, or fly-ins to explore nearby destinations or for training purposes. It's all about how you want to use the aircraft and the missions you have in mind. Do you have any specific flying goals or destinations you'd like to explore with a 4-seater single-engine airplane?

  • @j2moto582
    @j2moto582 3 роки тому

    Some pilots find more joy in maintenance and upkeep? Those people should stay their happy delusional ass on the ground. Lol.

  • @andrie9090
    @andrie9090 Рік тому

    Vanz RV10

  • @sparkyspace
    @sparkyspace 2 роки тому

    This reminds me of the World Series, which is only in America, and only involves Americans. Yes, it’s called the world series.

    • @tonyneel7908
      @tonyneel7908 Рік тому

      Not quite the best analogy since the best players from around the world play in the world series.

  • @mattivirta
    @mattivirta 2 роки тому

    best plane have my mind, 4 or 6 seat, 1 or 2 engine, less than 100 000$ and FREE delivery to thailand. new or used. best used budget plane have 4 seat,singke engine long range (additional tank) less than 80k $ normal used cessna 172 about similar cost 30k-55k no more newer.

  • @crimsonpyro6076
    @crimsonpyro6076 3 роки тому +1

    Old and Piston and Manny Seat and sea landing

  • @ersinc9080
    @ersinc9080 2 роки тому +1

    Vans RV 10 Anyone?

  • @rafaelcamposlemus7506
    @rafaelcamposlemus7506 3 роки тому

    traduzcan el audio a otro idioma, español...sv

  • @harryagrotis326
    @harryagrotis326 3 роки тому

    The fact of the matter is that greed is abundant in the aviation community. I take that back rampant is more like it.
    So let's say a shell of a single engine airplane costs $150k-$200k and then you need $100k for an engine and another$100k for avionics I can't see how they are priced where they are. Greed and lawyers is the only explanation that makes sense really.

    • @mattivirta
      @mattivirta 2 роки тому

      ower 100k have single engine plane ower price not newer need cost more.

  • @roymayhew6250
    @roymayhew6250 2 роки тому

    Hey , this is not fair , only people who can afford to buy the nice planes don't have to deal with stop lights . Nice planes . I remember when I took flying lessons . Nice planes , but you missed one thing , please do not create computers on the planes with male voice and female voice , there will be lot of mid air crashes , due to female computer having crush with male voice , and might get too close to one of them to chat in mid air while flying . No. actually I like them all . But parachute is not good way , It will create jerking motion . better method is hang glider to reduce impact from sudden jerking motion from Parachutes . hang glider to eject out , is better method . So in transition of safe landing , is exactly that , Pilots already know how to fly , so with hang glider safety method , without engine , can glide the craft more smoothly and better way , Parachutes are in mercy of the wind , and this is not good method from the height to jerk and glide down on mercy of the wind to land . but with hang glider method the pilot can control to safe and smoother landing , This is what I am thinking . When engine failure occurs , and if any other emergency occurs , dejection of hang glider is much better.

  • @gunsaway1
    @gunsaway1 3 роки тому +1

    Who in Hell can afford them?

  • @derrelcarter9401
    @derrelcarter9401 3 роки тому

    No speed or burn rates, sadly missing

  • @Skyprince27
    @Skyprince27 3 роки тому

    If I had money to burn like that, I would be shopping for a jet. Most likely, a Lear 35 from the late 70s…
    Spending 2/3 of a mil on a piston single is utter insanity.

    • @2Greenlid
      @2Greenlid 3 роки тому

      FYI, Jet maintenance & annuals several times a piston, operating costs two to three times even if you buy old jet for a million..

    • @Skyprince27
      @Skyprince27 3 роки тому +2

      @@2Greenlid
      If you have to ask, you can’t afford it.

    • @WattsUpDev
      @WattsUpDev 2 роки тому

      @@Skyprince27 It’s funny how so many broke people keep repeating that slogan, it was brought to the mainstream by gamblers, and rich people who later went bankrupt. I wonder how many (Wealthy) people you’ll hear using that slogan. The wealthy are strategic not dumb.

    • @WattsUpDev
      @WattsUpDev 2 роки тому

      @@Baroque-Handel Damn buying a Jet for the purpose of singing, life must be good in your reality lol

    • @Skyprince27
      @Skyprince27 2 роки тому

      @@WattsUpDev
      Could you clarify what aircraft you’re talking about, the Lear 35 or overpriced piston singles?

  • @yahatinda
    @yahatinda 3 роки тому +1

    BONANZA

  • @janwalor3014
    @janwalor3014 3 роки тому

    Technam is way too expensive!

  • @jamesbarisitz4794
    @jamesbarisitz4794 Рік тому

    Like boats, rent one.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Рік тому

      Renting a 4-seater single-engine piston airplane can be a great way to enjoy aviation without the commitment of ownership. It provides the flexibility to explore different aircraft and destinations. Have you had the chance to rent and fly one of these airplanes, and if so, any memorable flights or destinations you'd like to share from your rental experiences?

  • @wolfsdecree
    @wolfsdecree Рік тому

    The robotic AI voicover needs to go away. I wanted to like the video, but couldn't get through more than a couple minutes. I'm assuming this is an AI voice. If so, get rid of it. If it's a human narrator, speak more realistically. Maybe I'll watch the next one. AI voices need to go away.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Рік тому

      We appreciate your feedback on the voiceover. While I'm not directly involved in the video production, I'll pass along your sentiments. Your preference for a more realistic or natural-sounding delivery is duly noted. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!

  • @AClark-gs5gl
    @AClark-gs5gl 3 роки тому +1

    No to Diamond/China.

  • @snotnosewilly99
    @snotnosewilly99 2 роки тому

    $300,000 is cheap?????????

    • @mattivirta
      @mattivirta 2 роки тому +1

      NOT have, less 100k must be do.

    • @2Greenlid
      @2Greenlid 2 роки тому +1

      Yes, it is compared to most other airplanes in 2022, sorry it’s not 1970 anymore…….wish it was- I could buy a new car then for $3000….