Ukraine: The Latest Arms Package - Panacea or Plaster?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 11

  • @quantumeconomics-davidroch7157
    @quantumeconomics-davidroch7157  2 роки тому

    Thank you David

  • @quantumeconomics-davidroch7157
    @quantumeconomics-davidroch7157  2 роки тому +1

    The UK tank should be Challeger. I slippec up there. Thank for carching it

  • @fabioq6916
    @fabioq6916 2 роки тому +1

    Chieftain or Challenger?

  • @roseblue3368
    @roseblue3368 2 роки тому

    I beleive you made a good description of the situation thanks, may i ask what is your military background?

  • @guydreamr
    @guydreamr 2 роки тому

    I agree that this initial package will not be decisive, but it will set a precedent which can be built upon, or as you said, might lead to "ripple effects." Also, I thought the name of the British main battle tank was Challenger rather than Chieftain?

  • @davidwright8432
    @davidwright8432 2 роки тому

    Even if several other nations (the UK for instance) threw in a few tanks and troop-carriers, the numbers will be tiny compared with Ukrainian needs. Plus, if you have vehicles from all over - it's unlikely they could be well-maintained; problems of mechanics and spare parts; or have Ukrainian troops trained on them. Tanks aren't like cars - if you can drive an old VW, you can also drive a Rolls-Royce. The single Patriot missile system promised by the US isn't even the most recent version (are you kidding? Permit possible capture or larceny?); plus, its success rate is not promising. Nothing for Putin to worry about there. The Patriot gift is a rhetorical flourish, not serious help.