Its over rated. Quantum is fraud. This guy is stupid. Bet he never even did a double slit experiment. He may be good with liquid nitrogen and peltiers ( so am I ) but he is fooling himself along with many others. Its also not an accomplishment to be getting spied on daily by Google as your boss. Shoulda stayed small.
So the majority of people, or people who do not have aphantasia, have a so-called "mind's eye" and can basically run visual simulations of different kinds. I think what you said is true but also what he was saying is true as well. I'm not sure if all programmers and or mathematicians take problem solving to a visual angle. I do and I've been in the programming industry for about 20 years. In that time I've met maybe a handful of people who solve problems that way. Maybe it would be better to say that in 20 years I've met maybe a handful of people who openly discussed the mental images they used to solve some hard problem. For me I've come to the point where I don't really feel like I actually fully understand a thing until I can solve problems mentally and in a visual way.
If I am getting this right, they use thermodynamic noise in a similar way as stable diffusion use random noise as starting point. Then incorporate external parameters to steer the diffusion process ?
Yeah I think. And their whole idea is that regular computers waste energy trying to reduce noise to then on performed stable diffusion later on, so why not just use that noise from the start a creat a whole new way of computing
@@elijaht5188 yes and in general computing, specially in AI, noise would be generated and represented in a large array or matrix. While in this quantum thermodynamics computer the matrix just exists as part of device.
Normal Computing successfully did a matrix inversion with oscillators in a thermodynamic setup their blog explains it fairly comprehensibly: blog.normalcomputing.ai/posts/2023-11-09-thermodynamic-inversion/thermo-inversion.html
So he is not calculating the Master Equations of the Universe, but wants to build a computer that DOES it FOR US , AND THE COMPUTER is built on BROWNIAN MOTION. So he needs to call the computer the HYPER-IMPROBABILITY-DRIVE computer, and name his sons Lunkwill and Fook. (Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, for those that didn't get it.)
@@rodericksasu6976 Elon explained things simply, most STEM folks understood him. not this guy though, he is talking gobbledygook to sound smart, that’s his goal
Analog compute is incredibly hard and has been tried for decades. Been following this guy for a while now and he displays so many red flags, and has been accused of a scandal by a couple of publications. I hope he succeeds, but almost always when a startup claims to be able to achieve a technology in the short term which has been impossible to implement for decades, it turns out to be a scam. Have we learned nothing from Theranos?
Very interesting work, excited to see where it goes but jeez, beff's (and the interviewer's) ideology is proof that guys who spend their whole life balls deep in STEM textbooks should really be leaving the philosophy to the philosophers. The awkward code/law analogy is case in point of how these guys conceptualize everything in terms of the abstract, unfeeling, analytical worlds they live in. I don't hold that against them - obviously your head needs to be in that place 24/7 to do the kind of work they do, but they never seem to understand how there are other people who spend all day thinking about history, ethics, humanity, etc, and your towering IQ doesn't automatically mean you know better than them. Beware the Dunning-Kruger effect
Have to disagree respectfully. Code as law is a terrific analogy. Familiar with blockchain? You are binded by code instead of a human intermediary that is imperfectly trying to carry out the terms of a piece of paper
I would rather have STEM fields which bring direct expression and simplicity of communication to reality across all modalities of intelligence known to us; rather than be stuck behind some self proclaimed bunch of experts who force me into believing that their interpretation of the world is the correct one.
Maybe thermodynamic chips will transform computing, but they need a new speaker, this guy keeps humble bragging about his genius in a not so subtle way, and it's shredding the professionalism of the project
it's ironic you are using fuzzy technology and your presentations are fuzzy. It shouldn't be that hard to explain from a higher level how your technology works. I don't care about the CEO and what his thoughts are on AI and humanity. just do some animation or slides to show us pictorially on what this is. It's a bunch of jargon that no one understands. what is the theoretical performance you expect? how much per watt. How far are you from having a viable product? I mean you are in what seems like a small room with the smallest amount of equipment I have ever seen. It literally looks like you haven't even got past the theory stage. I read you got first round funding of $14m. I mean for something so revolutionary different technology that you need to build every single stack, $14.1m is like of by 20x it seems. It doesn't take a genius to figure out you don't even have a working prototype as of yet. No investors buy into your vision. Ceberas is another company that is making custom hardware for AI from the ground up and to give you a perspective they received $27m in 2016 (before this inflation we've had) and before this AI bubble. I would have thought any AI company would get way more in todays world. you are also bad at marketing. you need a short 3 minute video explaining how your tech will work, you are from the quantum computer world , so you should have seen UNSW and their breakthroughs are followed by 3 minute videos even though they don't even have all the elements to build a quantum computer, but those 3 minute videos spread like wild fire. Not your 40 minute video where one guy is stroking your ego. I'm sorry that sounds harsh but it's reality. The Founder and CEO seems smart enough so I have no objection backing him but if you can't convince me then how do you expect to convince VC money to notice you. spend $5k and get a video to show me how it works conceptually. It seems you have to use very cold temperatures to make this work. companies are get 100's of thousands of Nvidia GPU's and attach them together. I don't understand how even if you are 100x the performance from 1 chip , how you can thousands of these things all cold to so low level temperatures and then attach them together. is this even been developed? or is your concept no different to trying to build a quantum computer? you are still on theory stage? you take about the energy will be low but it uses refrigeration technology to keep it running which seems like it negates the power savings. This presentation reeks that you are running out or very close to depleting your VA money, and showing this (even though you rather not) to plead for more money, but if that's the case, talk about the tech and why we need it, talk about GPU's will take stupid amount of energy to scale up. whereas yours is better because etc. Is this just theory work? have you even got all the pieces to have a product? if you can't explain in simple terms what it does, how do you expect developers to try to programme this?
also look more professional. you look like grad students doing a phd. you both need to wear a suit at the least. and if you going to do a presentation for 40 minutes, do it in an office where you are sitting. draw some stuff on the white board . I really want to get excited about this because I love tech, but you have given me nothing and I'm underwhelmed. If it's all theory as of now and you have at least a 5-10 years before you able to build then you better have cracked AI to make it so much better because Nvidia aren't stopping their 2x performance increase every year. So by then you have to realise everyone already got the hardware for AI. why the hell will they buy yours unless it saved them 10x in electricity. Wow you guys are super intelligent and instead want to talk about what the founder thinks of where AI is going. snake oil pitch!!! you can do better
@@realgrilledsushi If I had millions in bank I wouldn't have such bad spelling and grammar. I'm literally a tech enthusiast. I don't mind this is EARLY THEORY stage. But honestly the two gentleman could use some marketing and presentation skills. I've also explained the logic, the company is trying to show of some exotic equipment to seem futuristic but I've seen more equipment in high school physics department, except for the refrigeration. so they don't have much of anything. If the product was good and they had a working prototype, this will easily get $100m round 1 funding. $14m seems like it's not even proven if it will work, and I still don't know what the hell it is. this is first I've heard about the company and I seen they had funding since last year. make a small 3 minute clip on how this thing will be put together and work. They are making visualisations of quantum computers and yet they don't have all the building blocks. If they can make videos of that and get people interested, then this can't be harder than full blown quantum computer to conceptualise. media outlet would buy this up. $5k for a video for that kind of coverage! And yes suits are important. He's not Jensen or Mark Zuckerberg yet. I'm only trying to give constructive criticism, the founder seems passionate and highly intellectual but you can't sell an idea on just showing you are smart. lastly its a valid question. Nvidia Blackwell in a full data centre has like what 32000 GPU's connected. how on earth does showing you just about got one prototype being build compare to 32000. and if they are 5 years away. you'll be most likely looking at 64000 GPU's. I didn't mention this before but since it's not deterministic and a hybrid. is it reproducible , see their is nothing to go off. be more humble and let your product do the talking.
my gut feeling: Extropic is gonna be the biggest vaporware since Theranos. This guy has no clue as to what he is talking about, using the same vague phrases throughout his interviews ("dancing electrons..."). Co-releasing a couple of papers about quantum computing software tools at Alphabet qualifies maybe to suggest to 95%+ of the audience that he is a genius... happy to get challenged about my humble opinion though😉
I love the interview here... but I feel like the "main show" was a trailer-- I literally thought it was a trailer because it felt like not a full S3 episode. I guess you are changing formats? Anyway, love this company and thank you for covering it!
Really great video… but tech people really don’t understand society or human nature. I wish they would understand that they have a lane, and their thinking breaks down as soon as they leave it.
They are well meaning rubes, usually with poor social skills are very easily to manipulate and highly susceptible to the libertarian propaganda the startup world force feeds everyone.
OK, really smart dude. Why do people feel the way they do about advanced technology? Why is this so widespread? Perhaps the book Ages of Discord by Turchin can give you a paradigm to understand it. The same paradigm might explain why you are able to reach into thermodynamic computing at this point in time. Just sayin'.
data and info is stored using an avaerage amount of electrons to increase data redundancy, generally what he is trying to do is use AI to control electron momentum in data storage, transport and manipulation. It will increase the risk of cyber security coz one can get control of your system at an electron level and there's really no difference between electrons at equal energy levels. Why not use photons and diodes, control photon movements
@@dustyveilplays It's not a quantum computer at all. It's classical with all the problems of superconducting. A liquid nitrogen cooling system will never be practical or go mainstream.
@@revisionfour Right he kind of alluded that with bringing it to silicon valley and trying to make it more streamlined. I'm a college dropout and I'm trying to keep up with a quantum scientist so excuse gaps in my knowledge. I like cars so I related it to that.
@@dustyveilplays No worries. I have been in Quantum labs and have been recruited for creating the software stack to control Quantum computers for D-Wave and IonQ, so I know a little bit. Beff left Google Quantum because of problems with superconducting and now he's implementing it again at Extropic. He's claiming later they will switch off of this architecture. It's going to be years before he can produce a working prototype, let alone get it competitive and into mass manufacturing.
@ZombieLincoln666 nope his company is joke, if this tech was too good nvidia a 3.5T$ company would invest billions of dollars in it. It's most likely gonna fail!
@@fosatech No. Terraforming is entirely different from building things on land, or even very large earth and water works like dams, or flattening a few small islands off the coast of Hong Kong and filling the ocean to build a new international airport. Terraforming is like, "Lets block the sun by spraying aluminum particles in the atmosphere on a global scale", on the basis that some people think the whole earth is too hot. Terraforming is like "Lets create an earthlike atmosphere on Mars."
"build the computer that will understand the universe" see, Douglas Adams wrote science - not science fiction, we weren't clever enough to keep up with him and just laughed it all off
Yeah and having all laws sunset automatically is bonkers. He stole that idea from Elon, but it's the dumbest thing imaginable. Our current government has to fight multiple times a year to avoid a total shutdown. Can you imagine them agreeing to allow the regulation of clean drinking water, or food safety standards. Pure libertarian lunacy.
Okaythe chip in action would be better presentation... second nothing to fail here he can get the patents and sell the theory's to other chip manufacturing companies anyway it seems complicated
@@Aedonius am not musk or Jeff .....he's funded why fear ... Ain't got cash my friend he needs talk to his investors only what i say and don't say never matters
Humanity lives here in this domain but far to long many have lived out yoo hoo woo uncertainty or extreme physicalism as we've been living under wartime platonic posterity in America since ww2. It's just been many distracting interactions of the samething as European political order viper causes by design..kept society in prayer logic whataboutism conservatism vs cursed rationalism progressive interventionism while censorship of all pragmatic common sense Christian objectivism proper which is based on, Relational reality feedback loop thermodynamical systems of human & hardware is here in this avenue . We've gotten miss aligned measure ignored what Freed the servitude in the first by knowing we could create new means of production. New form & shape hardware for improving the human condition through decoupling old systems, old Affinity getting in our way by re allocation of them to be taxonomically encrypted elsewhere useful so to still be able to live them out as a measure of faith without getting out of alignment but still able to maximize benefits seeking eqaul measure to know all things furthering that supply chain in concert with one another . Not educating youth on exactly what the movement of thought that inspired the men & there myths denying the Americans the ability to keep our eyes on the prize. Ease of access teaching men and myth plurisms is dangerous in this new computational paradigm as our human infrastructure must stay in alignment it's going to stress many beliefs and ways of working & living
Been watching this guy for months, he still can't explain what his chip does, if he's not setting of your bullshitter alarms then your alarms are broken.
Let’s reserve judgement until he releases the chips and he demonstrates a neural network and shows that it’s more efficient. As in it runs with lower energy. I heard him on another podcast and that’s what he claimed.
@@adnansarker3909 I'm rooting for Beff but he doesn't explain things simply and uses too many buzz words. He spends WAY too much time hyping without a prototype or benchmarks. Unfortunately right now there is no clear vision or roadmap to anything practical.
This kind of prediction is very opportunistic : if it happens, you'll brag a lot about it, if it doesn't, you already know nobody will have noticed you even said anything.
An episode on scalable room temp super conductors would be great. Weeks relevant to this south Korea cake out with some papers on this. Made a lot of waves not sure if legit or not This is great stuff do an episode on epaper screens/moniters and the dangers of blue light too. Our tech should he easier on our brains and eyes, just my 2 cents, met a business management consultant that says that dell is investing in eink tech apt screens because ppl are increasingly developing ocular migraine conditions, which I myself have
it's crazy how underrated this channel is
I just read the 23k and I WTF
Its over rated. Quantum is fraud. This guy is stupid. Bet he never even did a double slit experiment. He may be good with liquid nitrogen and peltiers ( so am I ) but he is fooling himself along with many others. Its also not an accomplishment to be getting spied on daily by Google as your boss. Shoulda stayed small.
@@635574the what now?
"I have a Different way of thinking than most people" - Thats exactly how most people think.
haha
yeah but not "most people" play with quantum computing
@@JuankM1050 And OP wasn't debunking the claim of playing with Quantum computing.
So the majority of people, or people who do not have aphantasia, have a so-called "mind's eye" and can basically run visual simulations of different kinds. I think what you said is true but also what he was saying is true as well. I'm not sure if all programmers and or mathematicians take problem solving to a visual angle. I do and I've been in the programming industry for about 20 years. In that time I've met maybe a handful of people who solve problems that way. Maybe it would be better to say that in 20 years I've met maybe a handful of people who openly discussed the mental images they used to solve some hard problem. For me I've come to the point where I don't really feel like I actually fully understand a thing until I can solve problems mentally and in a visual way.
@@crypticnomad yup , Makes sense
new paradigm is called jiggle based computing
If I am getting this right, they use thermodynamic noise in a similar way as stable diffusion use random noise as starting point. Then incorporate external parameters to steer the diffusion process ?
Yeah I think. And their whole idea is that regular computers waste energy trying to reduce noise to then on performed stable diffusion later on, so why not just use that noise from the start a creat a whole new way of computing
@@elijaht5188 yes and in general computing, specially in AI, noise would be generated and represented in a large array or matrix. While in this quantum thermodynamics computer the matrix just exists as part of device.
Normal Computing successfully did a matrix inversion with oscillators in a thermodynamic setup their blog explains it fairly comprehensibly: blog.normalcomputing.ai/posts/2023-11-09-thermodynamic-inversion/thermo-inversion.html
So he is not calculating the Master Equations of the Universe, but wants to build a computer that DOES it FOR US , AND THE COMPUTER is built on BROWNIAN MOTION. So he needs to call the computer the HYPER-IMPROBABILITY-DRIVE computer, and name his sons Lunkwill and Fook. (Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, for those that didn't get it.)
What a fascinating documentary! I can't believe no one is talking about this on social media (at least that I can find). Great work S3!
this guy has bs written all over. if he's actually got something interesting he's tanking it with his entire style of talking about it.
That's probably what they thought about Elon too 😂
@@rodericksasu6976 Elon explained things simply, most STEM folks understood him. not this guy though, he is talking gobbledygook to sound smart, that’s his goal
@@rodericksasu6976 He actually reminds me of Elon in many ways. 🙃
well, he talked himself into some serious gear
please be more specific in your criticism, so everyone can improve
"A mixture of different states over a continuum" ... so, hard-core analog at the speed-of-heat? - sweet.
Analog compute is incredibly hard and has been tried for decades.
Been following this guy for a while now and he displays so many red flags, and has been accused of a scandal by a couple of publications.
I hope he succeeds, but almost always when a startup claims to be able to achieve a technology in the short term which has been impossible to implement for decades, it turns out to be a scam.
Have we learned nothing from Theranos?
@@ItsRyanStudios can you please inform me more of the scandals and red flags?
@@willcowan7678 this. we need specifics not some tabloid bs
27:38 I did not realize this is Beff Jesos lmao
Biff Jesus
Same lol
thank you for bringing next gen innovations into public domain
How is this next gen innovation? They haven't done anything yet.
Paid shill comment
All you non quant/psychics people will come to realize hm of a grift this dude is
Catching up on this one, so incredible,
And by the video dates i can already tell a new one dropping soon! Amazing channel ❤ S³
Very interesting work, excited to see where it goes but jeez, beff's (and the interviewer's) ideology is proof that guys who spend their whole life balls deep in STEM textbooks should really be leaving the philosophy to the philosophers. The awkward code/law analogy is case in point of how these guys conceptualize everything in terms of the abstract, unfeeling, analytical worlds they live in. I don't hold that against them - obviously your head needs to be in that place 24/7 to do the kind of work they do, but they never seem to understand how there are other people who spend all day thinking about history, ethics, humanity, etc, and your towering IQ doesn't automatically mean you know better than them. Beware the Dunning-Kruger effect
Have to disagree respectfully. Code as law is a terrific analogy. Familiar with blockchain? You are binded by code instead of a human intermediary that is imperfectly trying to carry out the terms of a piece of paper
I would rather have STEM fields which bring direct expression and simplicity of communication to reality across all modalities of intelligence known to us; rather than be stuck behind some self proclaimed bunch of experts who force me into believing that their interpretation of the world is the correct one.
the thing is you're not able to do the same from opposite position you describe while they can
Maybe thermodynamic chips will transform computing, but they need a new speaker, this guy keeps humble bragging about his genius in a not so subtle way, and it's shredding the professionalism of the project
lol no. obviously you never tried to run your company. without such personality you get exactly zero founding.
it's ironic you are using fuzzy technology and your presentations are fuzzy.
It shouldn't be that hard to explain from a higher level how your technology works.
I don't care about the CEO and what his thoughts are on AI and humanity. just do some animation or slides to show us pictorially on what this is. It's a bunch of jargon that no one understands.
what is the theoretical performance you expect? how much per watt. How far are you from having a viable product? I mean you are in what seems like a small room with the smallest amount of equipment I have ever seen. It literally looks like you haven't even got past the theory stage. I read you got first round funding of $14m. I mean for something so revolutionary different technology that you need to build every single stack, $14.1m is like of by 20x it seems.
It doesn't take a genius to figure out you don't even have a working prototype as of yet. No investors buy into your vision. Ceberas is another company that is making custom hardware for AI from the ground up and to give you a perspective they received $27m in 2016 (before this inflation we've had) and before this AI bubble. I would have thought any AI company would get way more in todays world.
you are also bad at marketing. you need a short 3 minute video explaining how your tech will work, you are from the quantum computer world , so you should have seen UNSW and their breakthroughs are followed by 3 minute videos even though they don't even have all the elements to build a quantum computer, but those 3 minute videos spread like wild fire. Not your 40 minute video where one guy is stroking your ego. I'm sorry that sounds harsh but it's reality. The Founder and CEO seems smart enough so I have no objection backing him but
if you can't convince me then how do you expect to convince VC money to notice you. spend $5k and get a video to show me how it works conceptually.
It seems you have to use very cold temperatures to make this work. companies are get 100's of thousands of Nvidia GPU's and attach them together. I don't understand how even if you are 100x the performance from 1 chip , how you can thousands of these things all cold to so low level temperatures and then attach them together. is this even been developed? or is your concept no different to trying to build a quantum computer? you are still on theory stage?
you take about the energy will be low but it uses refrigeration technology to keep it running which seems like it negates the power savings.
This presentation reeks that you are running out or very close to depleting your VA money, and showing this (even though you rather not) to plead for more money, but if that's the case, talk about the tech and why we need it, talk about GPU's will take stupid amount of energy to scale up. whereas yours is better because etc.
Is this just theory work? have you even got all the pieces to have a product?
if you can't explain in simple terms what it does, how do you expect developers to try to programme this?
also look more professional. you look like grad students doing a phd. you both need to wear a suit at the least. and if you going to do a presentation for 40 minutes, do it in an office where you are sitting. draw some stuff on the white board .
I really want to get excited about this because I love tech, but you have given me nothing and I'm underwhelmed. If it's all theory as of now and you have at least a 5-10 years before you able to build then you better have cracked AI to make it so much better because Nvidia aren't stopping their 2x performance increase every year. So by then you have to realise everyone already got the hardware for AI. why the hell will they buy yours unless it saved them 10x in electricity. Wow you guys are super intelligent and instead want to talk about what the founder thinks of where AI is going. snake oil pitch!!! you can do better
@@percy9228So you’re saying you have millions in your bank account to invest if they made this seemed more professional?
@@realgrilledsushi If I had millions in bank I wouldn't have such bad spelling and grammar. I'm literally a tech enthusiast. I don't mind this is EARLY THEORY stage. But honestly the two gentleman could use some marketing and presentation skills.
I've also explained the logic, the company is trying to show of some exotic equipment to seem futuristic but I've seen more equipment in high school physics department, except for the refrigeration. so they don't have much of anything. If the product was good and they had a working prototype, this will easily get $100m round 1 funding. $14m seems like it's not even proven if it will work, and I still don't know what the hell it is.
this is first I've heard about the company and I seen they had funding since last year. make a small 3 minute clip on how this thing will be put together and work. They are making visualisations of quantum computers and yet they don't have all the building blocks. If they can make videos of that and get people interested, then this can't be harder than full blown quantum computer to conceptualise.
media outlet would buy this up. $5k for a video for that kind of coverage! And yes suits are important. He's not Jensen or Mark Zuckerberg yet.
I'm only trying to give constructive criticism, the founder seems passionate and highly intellectual but you can't sell an idea on just showing you are smart.
lastly its a valid question. Nvidia Blackwell in a full data centre has like what 32000 GPU's connected. how on earth does showing you just about got one prototype being build compare to 32000. and if they are 5 years away. you'll be most likely looking at 64000 GPU's.
I didn't mention this before but since it's not deterministic and a hybrid. is it reproducible , see their is nothing to go off. be more humble and let your product do the talking.
@@realgrilledsushi are you the CEO?
chill out on the amphetamines bro
my gut feeling: Extropic is gonna be the biggest vaporware since Theranos. This guy has no clue as to what he is talking about, using the same vague phrases throughout his interviews ("dancing electrons..."). Co-releasing a couple of papers about quantum computing software tools at Alphabet qualifies maybe to suggest to 95%+ of the audience that he is a genius... happy to get challenged about my humble opinion though😉
Nothing in physics says such a chip is impossible.
I love the interview here... but I feel like the "main show" was a trailer-- I literally thought it was a trailer because it felt like not a full S3 episode. I guess you are changing formats? Anyway, love this company and thank you for covering it!
pretty sure it's all bullshit, him explaining how it actually works feels like a student who did not study but makes up a response anyway
Reading Stephen Hawking at 7 or 8 is wild. I was reading Frog and Toad.
Nah, you could’ve read it, understanding is another matter
First Class Gentlemen. World changing idea. Best of luck to this endeavor.
I'd love to hear Michael Levin talk to this guy
Please can I have the diagrams for the mechanical implementation of a thermodynamic computer 🙏
No. What for?
This is gonna Blow up
S3 asks all of the questions I didn't know I wanted answered
Using entropy to compute. Love it. Is randomness a computer?
No don't sell that noble prize crab
So like cooking with no ingredients?
could you reccomend a solid book to understand the basics of physics to back track these computational relations with the physical ones hes making ?
I saw all of that in a DMT Trip!!!
very cool. wonder how far this will go
My thinking is that considering we are essentially..n=1..as far as conscious life...seems suspect that we should go out with a whimper
Really great video… but tech people really don’t understand society or human nature. I wish they would understand that they have a lane, and their thinking breaks down as soon as they leave it.
They are well meaning rubes, usually with poor social skills are very easily to manipulate and highly susceptible to the libertarian propaganda the startup world force feeds everyone.
nah already got interviewed, this guy is not pro humans and shady
I am SO pumped for everything yall are doing! Let’s goooo 💪😎💪
OK, really smart dude. Why do people feel the way they do about advanced technology? Why is this so widespread? Perhaps the book Ages of Discord by Turchin can give you a paradigm to understand it. The same paradigm might explain why you are able to reach into thermodynamic computing at this point in time. Just sayin'.
Sounds like an analog computer
i know this guy His ideas are like Super complex its true he thinks different from us
love it!
It's just my, I and me, prototype narcicist
You heard what you wanted to hear I heard a lot we , our , humanity and civilisation
@@Bboy235 Even more concerning
@@sucim what is he supposed to interview him back? this isn't lex fridman
data and info is stored using an avaerage amount of electrons to increase data redundancy, generally what he is trying to do is use AI to control electron momentum in data storage, transport and manipulation. It will increase the risk of cyber security coz one can get control of your system at an electron level and there's really no difference between electrons at equal energy levels. Why not use photons and diodes, control photon movements
Bro needs to accelerate on the treadmill
What are you talking about???
It's an interesting time to live
This guy is like Deep Thought in Khaki
He basically made a turbocharged quantum computer.
False
@@revisionfour I was only referencing utilizing the exhaust heat to then power it but I'm sure you have a more elaborate rebuttal.
@@dustyveilplays It's not a quantum computer at all. It's classical with all the problems of superconducting. A liquid nitrogen cooling system will never be practical or go mainstream.
@@revisionfour Right he kind of alluded that with bringing it to silicon valley and trying to make it more streamlined. I'm a college dropout and I'm trying to keep up with a quantum scientist so excuse gaps in my knowledge. I like cars so I related it to that.
@@dustyveilplays No worries. I have been in Quantum labs and have been recruited for creating the software stack to control Quantum computers for D-Wave and IonQ, so I know a little bit. Beff left Google Quantum because of problems with superconducting and now he's implementing it again at Extropic. He's claiming later they will switch off of this architecture. It's going to be years before he can produce a working prototype, let alone get it competitive and into mass manufacturing.
he's just another Elizabeth Holmes or Sam bankman fried in the making.
If he manages BS good enough he could be Elon
@ZombieLincoln666 nope his company is joke, if this tech was too good nvidia a 3.5T$ company would invest billions of dollars in it. It's most likely gonna fail!
I like him but I don't know if I can trust him because of how he views musk/bezos....
... AND how he mentioned terraforming OUR planet... where WE live.
@@mrwayneright oh, you mean like dams, roads, and fields? Terrifying
@@fosatech No. Terraforming is entirely different from building things on land, or even very large earth and water works like dams, or flattening a few small islands off the coast of Hong Kong and filling the ocean to build a new international airport. Terraforming is like, "Lets block the sun by spraying aluminum particles in the atmosphere on a global scale", on the basis that some people think the whole earth is too hot. Terraforming is like "Lets create an earthlike atmosphere on Mars."
Bruh im getting "DEVS tv show" vibe
"build the computer that will understand the universe"
see, Douglas Adams wrote science - not science fiction, we weren't clever enough to keep up with him and just laughed it all off
The 'e' should be efficient not effective
Next Gen Scam Artist right here.
Actually seems like a no brainer..as long as the math is good
Fck the haters, keep pushing
idk, there is definitely a line with deregulation.
Yeah and having all laws sunset automatically is bonkers. He stole that idea from Elon, but it's the dumbest thing imaginable. Our current government has to fight multiple times a year to avoid a total shutdown. Can you imagine them agreeing to allow the regulation of clean drinking water, or food safety standards. Pure libertarian lunacy.
Simple but elegant if not expected with only a touch of disappointment.
so hes trying to make a computer
Okaythe chip in action would be better presentation... second nothing to fail here he can get the patents and sell the theory's to other chip manufacturing companies anyway it seems complicated
people would benefit from learning more before criticizing
@@Aedonius am not musk or Jeff .....he's funded why fear ... Ain't got cash my friend he needs talk to his investors only what i say and don't say never matters
Haha unfortunate thumbnail looks like history channel "Alien civilization" meme guy
❤
Humanity lives here in this domain but far to long many have lived out yoo hoo woo uncertainty or extreme physicalism as we've been living under wartime platonic posterity in America since ww2. It's just been many distracting interactions of the samething as European political order viper causes by design..kept society in prayer logic whataboutism conservatism vs cursed rationalism progressive interventionism while censorship of all pragmatic common sense Christian objectivism proper which is based on,
Relational reality feedback loop thermodynamical systems of human & hardware is here in this avenue .
We've gotten miss aligned measure ignored what Freed the servitude in the first by knowing we could create new means of production. New form & shape hardware for improving the human condition through decoupling old systems, old Affinity getting in our way by re allocation of them to be taxonomically encrypted elsewhere useful so to still be able to live them out as a measure of faith without getting out of alignment but still able to maximize benefits seeking eqaul measure to know all things furthering that supply chain in concert with one another .
Not educating youth on exactly what the movement of thought that inspired the men & there myths denying the Americans the ability to keep our eyes on the prize.
Ease of access teaching men and myth plurisms is dangerous in this new computational paradigm as our human infrastructure must stay in alignment it's going to stress many beliefs and ways of working & living
Gigachad 💪
Been watching this guy for months, he still can't explain what his chip does, if he's not setting of your bullshitter alarms then your alarms are broken.
Yup. 👍
I think his smart, thermodynamic computing paradigm, just like quantum computing
@@lule-ahmed that's called b.s. Sounds great, means nothing, he can't explain it.
Let’s reserve judgement until he releases the chips and he demonstrates a neural network and shows that it’s more efficient. As in it runs with lower energy. I heard him on another podcast and that’s what he claimed.
Oh no
Prediction: In 3 years Extropic will be one of the fastest growing companies in history, if not the fastest.
Dumb. They'll be lucky to get a working prototype chip within 5 years
Prediction: comes out as huge grift
@@adnansarker3909 I'm rooting for Beff but he doesn't explain things simply and uses too many buzz words. He spends WAY too much time hyping without a prototype or benchmarks. Unfortunately right now there is no clear vision or roadmap to anything practical.
This kind of prediction is very opportunistic : if it happens, you'll brag a lot about it, if it doesn't, you already know nobody will have noticed you even said anything.
so many people are triggered by their inability to understand :D most funny comment section
Why is he so overweight and why didn’t he finish his PhD?
he is very strong and he is smarter with bigger better plans than wasting time on the phd.
Why do you need to know ?
Different strokes for different folks.
An episode on scalable room temp super conductors would be great. Weeks relevant to this south Korea cake out with some papers on this. Made a lot of waves not sure if legit or not
This is great stuff do an episode on epaper screens/moniters and the dangers of blue light too. Our tech should he easier on our brains and eyes, just my 2 cents, met a business management consultant that says that dell is investing in eink tech apt screens because ppl are increasingly developing ocular migraine conditions, which I myself have