@@Nayr7928 now you are confusing me. why do you want active cooling just to lower the power. i thought you wanted active cooling so you can maintain the peak performance of these SoCs
@@quantumdot7393 Yes. I just want more control over it. Just like how I can lower my desktop GPU's power limit. I'm pretty sure phones rack up the power usage to maintain steady performance even when the game doesn't need it. I'd like control over that so I can test things out where I can maximize sustained performance and efficiency.
You made an interesting video. I saw a video last week, and it included previous SoC's like the SD 8Gen2. That processor performed well in some stress tests. Made 300th thumbs up.
This is not that realistic either because you are likely to play a game for 30 minutes and then wait 2-3-4 minutes to join another round so the phone does have "some" time to cool down.
@@alexandruilea915 , that's a good point. But what Garry is doing here is a form of stress testing to find the performance limits. Your suggestion can also be another test.
@@alexandruilea915it is realistic because even before going back in the lobbies in games are not nothing, it is still graphically stressing so there's no time for real cooling like on the homescreen...and this only apply to fps game. Adventure on the other hand is continuous fire for 3+ hours like sky children of light i play
Great topic! Suggestion for a video: check battery efficiency for different SOC during phone calls? One big factor which seems to be impacting Exynos (S24) worse battery life compared to QC (S23) where GSMarena have tested. Perhaps wou could get a Xiaomi with QC vs Mediatek (PhoneX vs PhoneX PRO).
Great video Gary 🙂 The Exynos 2400 is an powerhouse yet fairly efficient ✅ A step in the right direction for sure. Another thing I've realised is that the standby battery has improved drastically. I've uploaded clips of me playing brand new Switch games like Sonic Superstars & Mario Wonder at full speed.
This, absolutely this. Standby, with 5g and bluetooth in background, is awesome on exynos 2400. Then when you need peak performance like with AI and Ray tracing is there. Maybe with software optimisation can be even better (in context switches for example), in the end a 10 core cluster is new for Samsung One UI to handle.
One thing is certain, the Exynos SoC isn't terrible this time around. The battery drain and heat issues that plagued previous iterations seem to be mostly fixed. The SD 8 Gen 3 is still fairly ahead in terms of CPU performance and quite a bit ahead in GPU. For the average user it won't be very noticeable though. I'm just glad to see Qualcomm finally beating Apple silicon. It took a long time to get there.
Great stuff Gary, I didn't realize these flagship processors have pushed so far beyond what can be done in the phone form factor as far as cooling goes. I'll probably be on the lookout for lower clocked midrange chips since that level of performance is all a phone can sustain anyway. 👍
That performance drop on Apple is absolutely criminal. It indicates that they overclock GPU to unsustainable level to inflate the benchmark scores, when in reality the GPU will run at 60% of speed.
Based on your test the new Exynos 2400 is definitely performaning well against its counterpart sd and mtk. i would assume that amd gpu could surpass qualcomm adreno in the future.
Even with the debuff from the manufacturing process its still not far from 8 Gen 3 or 9300. Its ray tracing capability is even slightly better. Imagine if it's manufactured on a proper process.
I really liked this concept of sustained performance it gives a lot of insight of how different processors work also if you could make similar videos every year thanks. And would request to make similar content for upper midrange and mid range processors.
I like the info, it’s very interesting to see how the design choices pay out for this. Sustained performance doesn’t affect my purchasing decision though.
@@GaryExplainssustained performance means constant FPS which is more important than high fps numbers but with frequent drops. The Samsung's could sustain better performance if they didn't push that hard in the beginning I think.
Because he don't even tried to make a fair comparison from the start. If he wanted a fair comparison he should include the SD8G2 too and split the result into 2 parts (SD8G2/Tensor 3/A17 and SD8G3/Dimensity 9300/Exynos 2400). With this the result is similar like you compare their 4 generations backward models, so Pixel 4 XL (SD855) vs iPhone 11 (A13) vs Note 20 (SD865), on what earth is that a fair comparison..? Just because Note 20 released with iPhone 12 (A14), and the Note 10 with also SD855 like Pixel 4 XL is 5 gens backward not just 4 like for the others...
@@TamasKiss-yk4stas a pixel owner myself we all know tensor has always been behind in raw performance, the test wasn't unfair, the pixel 8 is the latest tensor chip and will be until October. I would have liked to see something like the Asus ROG phone or another phone that really pushes cooling to see if they are worth the increased price and camera sacrifices.
I am just curious do you run the tests multiple times or just once? By multiple times I mean, do you do 20X then let the phone cool down and then run it 20X again for a couple of times just to make sure that there werent any outliers? I am just asking because you mentioned when referring to those weird dips and spikes as possible outliers. If you only run one set of the tests wont it be possible that the dip after the second run on the iphone just be an outlier? I assume that if it was an outlier that it wont make to much of a difference (meaning that the iphone would probably stil drop down to that level either then by run 3 or 4)
Expected more from the Dimensity 9300 but it was still good Also so glad to see Exynos being in the game, RDNA3 Raytracing lead was expexted. I think if this was using tsmc fab, It would have had a bigger lead in raytracing and a match in raster with Qualcomm Apple is really disappointing here
I would love to see these tests run across all 3 Tensor generations. The GPU in the first Tensor still burst-performs higher than the GPU in the 3rd Gen SKU.
@@Jerry-hc7yx u don't need a fan u need a right amount of thermal dissipation or heat spreather to cool itself but apparently apply don't do so well on this type of cooling , what the phones without a fan using it's a passive cooling that in the end uses the frame to cool itself , the better design the faster dissipate the heat
I don't own or have access to an IQOO12 or an iPhone 15 Pro Max. How can I do the test on those phones if I don't have access to them? This is part of the problem, the channel wasn't popular enough to justify investing in phones for testing, etc.
This is part of why Pixel is the "iPhone of Android". A couple of Tensor iterations down the road: might be noteworthy if the performance gets closer to Snapdragon level and continues to have less of a sustained drop compared to the others.
I covered that in the release video of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. The info here was a very quick overview mainly pertaining to the testing. Limited time and space. Many things not mentioned.
I feel like they should have tested similar phones in terms of cooling performance. S24 is fine but test an s24 with snapdragon and not the plus or make them both plus. Throw in the ultra too since it should have the best cooling in theory.
Would you mind if I criticize you here slightly? First, we could have really used some temperature figure here. Then don't you think a small s24 among all those big smartphones you compare specially for sustained performance is a bit unfair?
Oh okay. The s24+ has usually much better score. @@GaryExplains sorry for the confusion.. Also please include the temperature which will let us know the actual reason behind the throttling. Thank you for the video.
@@GaryExplains Gary in competitive gaming scenario which core is important Single core with higher clock speed or multi cores with lower or medium clock speed? Pls I've this confusion for a long time if the single core is more important definitely iphone would be better but not for ah long playing hours I mean in sustain performance right?
Like i commented a year ago. You cannot go over physics. Heath is there and all about these socs now is thermal dissipation, we pretty much hitted the wall here. There is only active cooling or some new technology that can solve this. 3nm or 2nm won't solve this.
Well, Google and Apple still nit showed us the SD8G3 conpetitor chip, because Samsung retreated, and not enough confident to release a phone directly with the iPhone, the generations still not crossed.. easy to count 4 generations backwars where Pixel 4 XL (SD855) and iPhone 11 (A13) released, but the Note 20 (SD865) is not their competitor, you must go 5 gens backward on Samsung timeline to find the Note 10 (SD855) what released 2 weeks before iPhone 11.. so why wouldn you call that to a fair conparison where SD855 vs A13 vs SD865 is compared, when that SD865 Note 20 released with the iPhone 12, so not to professional to compare only with the iPhone 11 (especially when the Pixel 4 XL in 2019 also had the same SD855 like the Note 10 in 2019, and isn't that obvious their competitor is that iPhone what released between them?)
The best sustained performance is due to the cooling not the cpu. So the better question would be sustained performance in this phone with this cooling solution.
That isn't true. A CPU that produces less heat needs less cooling. Most phones have passive cooling, so the "cooling solution" is basically how big is the phone so that it has a larger surface area to expel the heat.
Why would Apple do it intentionally, it means that games will slow down after a few minutes. Are you saying Apples wants games to slow down intentionally?
Amd gpu is no slouch. I am still doubting samsung 4nm is worse than tsmc 4nm process. If samsung fixes this with their 3nm it will be great competition to snapdragon.
@@GaryExplainsknowing Apple’s reputation of throttling hard on their CPU’s when it comes to thermals (even the desktop range) on the surface it would appear that way😢
Gaza might have mentioned how much power (efficiency) was expended by each SOC. I think Apple's SOC beats most, if not all of these in Single-core and Multi-core Geekbench and with slower RAM than all of these. You have to say Apple's chip did very well considering it had the lowest number of cores and don't forget it is probably the most power efficient. Remember also the clever design feature they have put into their SOC as well, not just using ARMs design without any improvements. Not good to leave out the important stuff and home in on the smallest detail. But hey lets not let the important specs get in the way of a good story!
Are smart phones designed for sustained performance as what do users use them for? Unlike desktop computers which are designed to work 7 days a week constant.
I don't think they are designed for any particular usage pattern. There are obvious physical constraints like battery size and cooling. As the video shows the performance drops after a few minutes and then kind of plateaus. That is why quick charging is a thing, people like to top up the battery before heading out.
So SD 8G3 is best considering higher performance scores even after throttling. Surely, heat dissipation is a concern here as ROG 3 with vented fans shows better stability
This just shows Exynos is a bad chip. We pay more in EU than US for inferior chip. Feel sorry for everyone who paid for S24 exy models. Only reason people are happy is because it was even worse before.
It's true that overall the Exynos 2400 is worse than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, but you seem to purposely not notice that this same Exynos 2400 that you decry so much, is better than other processors, and especially Apple's A17 Pro that they try to sell us as the pinnacle of the pinnacle in terms of smartphone processor.
Nope, if it was worse it would have throttled like hell, this test only shows how the Exyno 2400 is stable, stop blaming the SoC and wait for the long term reviews
I'd like to see someone turn one of these SOCs into a laptop with proper active cooling running a Linux desktop.
Why when you are going to have the x elite soon enough
I'd like to have an option to throttle down power usage so I have a consistent performance from start to finish.
@@Nayr7928 now you are confusing me. why do you want active cooling just to lower the power. i thought you wanted active cooling so you can maintain the peak performance of these SoCs
@@quantumdot7393those are different people
@@quantumdot7393 Yes. I just want more control over it. Just like how I can lower my desktop GPU's power limit. I'm pretty sure phones rack up the power usage to maintain steady performance even when the game doesn't need it. I'd like control over that so I can test things out where I can maximize sustained performance and efficiency.
There should be a category for this in the Geekbench scoreboards
Lmao other benchmarks have it, geekbench probably won't have it considering who they cheat for has shit sustained performance
You made an interesting video. I saw a video last week, and it included previous SoC's like the SD 8Gen2. That processor performed well in some stress tests. Made 300th thumbs up.
Went to oneplus 9 because of exynos at the time, tried coming back to s24+ but it's exynos again. Brilliant.
Repeatability is a test many ignore but should in any comprehensive testing strategy. Good job!
This is not that realistic either because you are likely to play a game for 30 minutes and then wait 2-3-4 minutes to join another round so the phone does have "some" time to cool down.
@@alexandruilea915 , that's a good point. But what Garry is doing here is a form of stress testing to find the performance limits. Your suggestion can also be another test.
@@alexandruilea915it is realistic because even before going back in the lobbies in games are not nothing, it is still graphically stressing so there's no time for real cooling like on the homescreen...and this only apply to fps game. Adventure on the other hand is continuous fire for 3+ hours like sky children of light i play
@@lekejoshua4402 in lobby the GPU is way less stressed.
Great video professor!
Great topic!
Suggestion for a video: check battery efficiency for different SOC during phone calls? One big factor which seems to be impacting Exynos (S24) worse battery life compared to QC (S23) where GSMarena have tested. Perhaps wou could get a Xiaomi with QC vs Mediatek (PhoneX vs PhoneX PRO).
❤❤ most needed test. Thanks
You're welcome 😊
Great video Gary 🙂
The Exynos 2400 is an powerhouse yet fairly efficient ✅
A step in the right direction for sure.
Another thing I've realised is that the standby battery has improved drastically.
I've uploaded clips of me playing brand new Switch games like Sonic Superstars & Mario Wonder at full speed.
This, absolutely this.
Standby, with 5g and bluetooth in background, is awesome on exynos 2400. Then when you need peak performance like with AI and Ray tracing is there.
Maybe with software optimisation can be even better (in context switches for example), in the end a 10 core cluster is new for Samsung One UI to handle.
One thing is certain, the Exynos SoC isn't terrible this time around. The battery drain and heat issues that plagued previous iterations seem to be mostly fixed. The SD 8 Gen 3 is still fairly ahead in terms of CPU performance and quite a bit ahead in GPU. For the average user it won't be very noticeable though.
I'm just glad to see Qualcomm finally beating Apple silicon. It took a long time to get there.
GPU Exynos has an edge in solar bay test since it tests RT capabilities@@elimalinsky7069
Great stuff Gary, I didn't realize these flagship processors have pushed so far beyond what can be done in the phone form factor as far as cooling goes. I'll probably be on the lookout for lower clocked midrange chips since that level of performance is all a phone can sustain anyway. 👍
That performance drop on Apple is absolutely criminal. It indicates that they overclock GPU to unsustainable level to inflate the benchmark scores, when in reality the GPU will run at 60% of speed.
Based on your test the new Exynos 2400 is definitely performaning well against its counterpart sd and mtk. i would assume that amd gpu could surpass qualcomm adreno in the future.
Even with the debuff from the manufacturing process its still not far from 8 Gen 3 or 9300. Its ray tracing capability is even slightly better. Imagine if it's manufactured on a proper process.
I really liked this concept of sustained performance it gives a lot of insight of how different processors work also if you could make similar videos every year thanks. And would request to make similar content for upper midrange and mid range processors.
I like the info, it’s very interesting to see how the design choices pay out for this. Sustained performance doesn’t affect my purchasing decision though.
Great job 🎉🎉
Why is no one talking about how the Google pixel managed to keep a sustainable performance right from the first run
Because the performance is quite low and has nowhere to go.
@@GaryExplainssustained performance means constant FPS which is more important than high fps numbers but with frequent drops. The Samsung's could sustain better performance if they didn't push that hard in the beginning I think.
Because he don't even tried to make a fair comparison from the start. If he wanted a fair comparison he should include the SD8G2 too and split the result into 2 parts (SD8G2/Tensor 3/A17 and SD8G3/Dimensity 9300/Exynos 2400).
With this the result is similar like you compare their 4 generations backward models, so Pixel 4 XL (SD855) vs iPhone 11 (A13) vs Note 20 (SD865), on what earth is that a fair comparison..? Just because Note 20 released with iPhone 12 (A14), and the Note 10 with also SD855 like Pixel 4 XL is 5 gens backward not just 4 like for the others...
@@TamasKiss-yk4stas a pixel owner myself we all know tensor has always been behind in raw performance, the test wasn't unfair, the pixel 8 is the latest tensor chip and will be until October. I would have liked to see something like the Asus ROG phone or another phone that really pushes cooling to see if they are worth the increased price and camera sacrifices.
This was a really informative video. Thank you Gary
Glad it was helpful!
I am just curious do you run the tests multiple times or just once? By multiple times I mean, do you do 20X then let the phone cool down and then run it 20X again for a couple of times just to make sure that there werent any outliers? I am just asking because you mentioned when referring to those weird dips and spikes as possible outliers. If you only run one set of the tests wont it be possible that the dip after the second run on the iphone just be an outlier? I assume that if it was an outlier that it wont make to much of a difference (meaning that the iphone would probably stil drop down to that level either then by run 3 or 4)
Expected more from the Dimensity 9300 but it was still good
Also so glad to see Exynos being in the game, RDNA3 Raytracing lead was expexted. I think if this was using tsmc fab, It would have had a bigger lead in raytracing and a match in raster with Qualcomm
Apple is really disappointing here
I would love to see these tests run across all 3 Tensor generations. The GPU in the first Tensor still burst-performs higher than the GPU in the 3rd Gen SKU.
What a great video
As a rule of thumb if a processor uses more than 7watts it's going to throttle
wish they make again a chip like dimensity 8100 , that was the best in terms of long time performance and battery life
Obviously cz no Fan for cooling down that thing...🔥🤝
@@Jerry-hc7yx u don't need a fan u need a right amount of thermal dissipation or heat spreather to cool itself but apparently apply don't do so well on this type of cooling , what the phones without a fan using it's a passive cooling that in the end uses the frame to cool itself , the better design the faster dissipate the heat
@@cristianJoker2512 ...But Redmagic and ROG got inbuilt fan
......
@@Jerry-hc7yx that fan it's annoying, had the 8 pro and was a nightmare , imagine 20000rpm
3:40 Aren't SD 8Gen3 and the Dimensity 9300 manufactured on the same process?
Hello Sir Why your Speed Test G Channel Not Run?
Unfortunately it wasn't very popular.
@@GaryExplains But Today Need Your Speed Test G Channel Beacuse This Channel Very Informative About phone performance.
I am glad you think so, but as I said it wasn't popular, so clearly it isn't needed.
@@GaryExplains Sir Please I Want IQOO 12 vs Iphone 15 pro max Speed Test G Test.
Please upload Vedios on Speed Test G Channel Please 🥺
I don't own or have access to an IQOO12 or an iPhone 15 Pro Max. How can I do the test on those phones if I don't have access to them? This is part of the problem, the channel wasn't popular enough to justify investing in phones for testing, etc.
It seems that the Apple SoC's are even less powerfull as thought from seeing the results of a single run.
u a legend for this
Excellent 👌
Glad to hear you found it useful. 👍
Can you explain to me which is more essential for gaming in mobile chipset? cpu or gpu?
It isn't a simple one or the other answer. They both work together. Having said that, for mobile gaming the GPU is very important.
Would've loved to see this compared to 8 gen 2 as well
What's with the Vivo? Heat?
This is part of why Pixel is the "iPhone of Android". A couple of Tensor iterations down the road: might be noteworthy if the performance gets closer to Snapdragon level and continues to have less of a sustained drop compared to the others.
Sustained performance
3:56 Curious why there's no mention of Unreal Engine 5 Global Illumination in the Adreno GPU area. 🤔
I covered that in the release video of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. The info here was a very quick overview mainly pertaining to the testing. Limited time and space. Many things not mentioned.
@@GaryExplains Okay Gary. Thanks for the clarification.
How about battery life on exynos vs snapdragon?
Ray tracing performance is where exynos 2400 really shine
I feel like they should have tested similar phones in terms of cooling performance.
S24 is fine but test an s24 with snapdragon and not the plus or make them both plus. Throw in the ultra too since it should have the best cooling in theory.
Would you mind if I criticize you here slightly?
First, we could have really used some temperature figure here. Then don't you think a small s24 among all those big smartphones you compare specially for sustained performance is a bit unfair?
It was the Plus, not the small one.
Oh okay. The s24+ has usually much better score. @@GaryExplains sorry for the confusion..
Also please include the temperature which will let us know the actual reason behind the throttling.
Thank you for the video.
Why u don't used gaming phone with active cooling system
Because those are niche. Most phones with all the different SoC have passive cooling. To use a phone with active cooling would distort the results.
We all go down at some point.
Yeah but I guess you don't want to have to struggle just after just one run.
Try to examine REDMAGIC 9 pro it has inbuilt fan and massive copper plates cooling system result must be far ahead from other Snapdragon 8 gen 3 🔥
Yes, but that is a niche product that doesn't represent a "normal" flagship smartphone.
@@GaryExplains Gary in competitive gaming scenario which core is important Single core with higher clock speed or multi cores with lower or medium clock speed? Pls I've this confusion for a long time if the single core is more important definitely iphone would be better but not for ah long playing hours I mean in sustain performance right?
The GPU.
can you do speedtestg?
Whay you stopped from making speed test G 😢.
Your backdrop looks like the inside of a film camera.
whatever ever happend to Speed Test G ?
Like i commented a year ago. You cannot go over physics. Heath is there and all about these socs now is thermal dissipation, we pretty much hitted the wall here. There is only active cooling or some new technology that can solve this. 3nm or 2nm won't solve this.
Let's see what we get next year.
Well, Google and Apple still nit showed us the SD8G3 conpetitor chip, because Samsung retreated, and not enough confident to release a phone directly with the iPhone, the generations still not crossed.. easy to count 4 generations backwars where Pixel 4 XL (SD855) and iPhone 11 (A13) released, but the Note 20 (SD865) is not their competitor, you must go 5 gens backward on Samsung timeline to find the Note 10 (SD855) what released 2 weeks before iPhone 11.. so why wouldn you call that to a fair conparison where SD855 vs A13 vs SD865 is compared, when that SD865 Note 20 released with the iPhone 12, so not to professional to compare only with the iPhone 11 (especially when the Pixel 4 XL in 2019 also had the same SD855 like the Note 10 in 2019, and isn't that obvious their competitor is that iPhone what released between them?)
The best sustained performance is due to the cooling not the cpu. So the better question would be sustained performance in this phone with this cooling solution.
That isn't true. A CPU that produces less heat needs less cooling. Most phones have passive cooling, so the "cooling solution" is basically how big is the phone so that it has a larger surface area to expel the heat.
But at the absolute level the Snapdragon 8 gen 3 seems to be the best.
Not really fair comparing the s24 with + model which has bigger and better cooling!
5:53 iPhone do it intentionally… They don't care about benchmark… 🤣
I noticed it from the beginning of A17 Pro…
*except Geekbench
Why would Apple do it intentionally, it means that games will slow down after a few minutes. Are you saying Apples wants games to slow down intentionally?
Amd gpu is no slouch. I am still doubting samsung 4nm is worse than tsmc 4nm process. If samsung fixes this with their 3nm it will be great competition to snapdragon.
@@GaryExplainsknowing Apple’s reputation of throttling hard on their CPU’s when it comes to thermals (even the desktop range) on the surface it would appear that way😢
@felipe367 Are you saying that Apple throttles is CPUs on mobile and on the desktop when it doesn't need to?
Yup it does sometimes since most iphones only have 2 or 3 graphite pads for cooling @@GaryExplains
In layman words, which one is the best processor?
Gaza might have mentioned how much power (efficiency) was expended by each SOC. I think Apple's SOC beats most, if not all of these in Single-core and Multi-core Geekbench and with slower RAM than all of these. You have to say Apple's chip did very well considering it had the lowest number of cores and don't forget it is probably the most power efficient. Remember also the clever design feature they have put into their SOC as well, not just using ARMs design without any improvements. Not good to leave out the important stuff and home in on the smallest detail. But hey lets not let the important specs get in the way of a good story!
Are smart phones designed for sustained performance as what do users use them for? Unlike desktop computers which are designed to work 7 days a week constant.
Many uses cases (including gaming, watching videos, social media, etc) require the phone to be on and active for several minutes at a time.
Several minutes, is that all they are supposed to be used for?@@GaryExplains
I don't think they are designed for any particular usage pattern. There are obvious physical constraints like battery size and cooling. As the video shows the performance drops after a few minutes and then kind of plateaus. That is why quick charging is a thing, people like to top up the battery before heading out.
IMO Kirin chips had the best sustained performance.
Based on what numbers/metrics?
Back when qualcomm went for samsung for the 888, 8g1 yeah
Great video but 8Gen3 for Galaxy is clocked higher so it might not be accurate representation of general 8gen3
exynos seems to be the most consistent
Its dimensity 9300 had the highest scores actually 2x more after so many tests 8 gen 3 dropped down hard
So SD 8G3 is best considering higher performance scores even after throttling. Surely, heat dissipation is a concern here as ROG 3 with vented fans shows better stability
Qcom for the win.
Ohh I thought its over the years sustained performance.
Good job exynos
Snapdragon 865 remains superior in this regard. I miss my Oppo Find X2 Pro.
lol the exynos dips below the yearold and a half iPhone at this point this thing sucks
It's no surprise that overall the Snapdragon is the slightly better one between it and A17Pro .
The A17 is still the more powerful soc though.
Do that mean iPhone is faster or slower? 🙄
Depends on when you measure and what you measure.
How is samsung outperforming iphone despite having half decent thermals lol
This just shows Exynos is a bad chip. We pay more in EU than US for inferior chip. Feel sorry for everyone who paid for S24 exy models. Only reason people are happy is because it was even worse before.
It's true that overall the Exynos 2400 is worse than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, but you seem to purposely not notice that this same Exynos 2400 that you decry so much, is better than other processors, and especially Apple's A17 Pro that they try to sell us as the pinnacle of the pinnacle in terms of smartphone processor.
Nope, if it was worse it would have throttled like hell, this test only shows how the Exyno 2400 is stable, stop blaming the SoC and wait for the long term reviews
It isn't by some tests and games, anyway the long performance reviews will say if its better or not@@rolins3279
That is not true tho. Also in some gaming scenarios it was performing better than 8g3
Even after having a smaller form factor of a phone
It's not as bad as I was expecting it's actually quite acceptable benchmark wise
Apples chips are amazingly stable, ideally they should all be a flat line like this. I admire how well regulated it is
But it isn't a flat line is it? It drops sharply at the beginning.
@@GaryExplainsIt drops to a regulated constant, It probably improves its own power efficiency also.
It is mainly to do with cooling, not power efficiency.
Really bad performance from the iPhone
bad cooling you mean 😂
Their SOCs potential is wasted due to bad heat dissipation.
Can you test against dedicated gaming phones like the Asus Rog Phone 8?
Hum first !
Close! But no, @CanadianBakin42O was first.
A15 has most sustained performance in apple
Bring back @SpeedTestG