VICTOR OSIMHEN VS BENJAMIN SESKO - WHO SHOULD CHELSEA SIGN?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 тра 2024
- FOLLOW ALL MY SOCIALS
TikTok: / tqt_yt
Twitter: / thequicktake
Instagram: / the_quicktake
~
~
Microphone Used: www.amazon.co.uk/Shure-MV7-Mi...
~
~
Background Music:
Conant Gardens - Matt Large
Ginger Chews - Daniel Sitts
~
TheQuickTake is a channel dedicated to creating football-related content with a focus towards Chelsea Football Club. Any opinions expressed are of my own, some you may agree with, some you may not. One of the things that makes football so interesting is the diversity of opinions and the conversations had around them. By subscribing to TheQuickTake, not only are you supporting the channel, but you are also joining a welcoming community filled with like-minded individuals, all with a passion for football.
Thank You For Watching, Always.
TQT - Спорт
If data is not contextualised, it becomes noise
My thing with sesko, yh he is a good striker but we have already a young striker in jackson. If we do sign sesko, what does that do for jackson. With osimhen he's 25 experienced, suits what the squad is missing and very good. And osimhen will get used to prem football quicker than sesko because before this season sesko was playing in the Norway league same as haaland but haaland numbers was insane and had like 2 full seasons at dortmund before moving. When osimhen is 30, jackson will be hitting his prime and it be better for jackson to have osimhen to learn off than a fellow young striker in sesko and do we want to go into next season with 2 young strikers.
Problem with Victor is his release clause, too expensive
@@MalibongweMbatha-gi4ri I believe that we don't have to pay his release clause to get osimhen
Austrian not Norwegian league. sesko is in much better form and has scored or assisted 10 times in his last 11 games. it'll comes down to price and availability. i would prefer a cheaper prem proven option like toney for 40 mil
@@rogue9800 PSG is willing to pay the rc if im not mistaken so yeah the fee is the problem
And Chelsea have Deivid Washington as another young centre forward at 18 years old and both could learn from Osimhen. If both could learn their trade from Osimhen, then we could be good for the next 10 to 12 years to come.
Osimhen in 2019 was one of the top strikers in ligue 1 so saying Sesko currently is better than Osimhen in 2019 is false. He even scored against us in 2019 while at Lille.
I think Osimhen also won the u17 world cup, while being the top goal scorer. He is clearly the more proven striker so get him. Sesko will end up benching to Jackson I can just feel it. Bundesliga is easier, I bet Jackson would score +20 goals in that league
@@virtualcity721 Osimhen's goal scoring record at U17 is the all time record which has still not been broken till date. 10 goals in a single tournament
Why would we need sesko when we have Jackson, just bring in osimhen
Because his a young giant 6’4 bro
He's far better than Nicolas Jackson!
Height doesn't really help if they can't use it
Kai was 6'2"but barely won any headers if we really are going for height
I'd rather the club bring back Dom Solanke and he is prem proven 25 and in his prime rn @@chukwuonweuche5816
@@MalibongweMbatha-gi4ri better finisher but Jackson better every where else, but sesko a beast bro
You all must stop obsessing on Osimhen, he’s not due to Chelsea!
The defences in Seria A are far harder to score against than in the Bundeslega.
Osimhen is the better option imo. He also is Older, has won trophies before and also has Leadership qualities which we are lacking.
The defences are not harder in the modern Série A.
True, i've notice Kane and Lewa's numbers while in the Bundesliga. There are some teams there with school boy defenders
You're right
Italian teams are very tactical and they produce some of the best defenders in football.
Really? Bundasliga are doing very well in Europe
Love the video but there's alot of context missing in the data
Literally. Osimhen has almost exclusively played his senior football in the top 5 leagues.
Yea nah, Sesko has ended the season strong, but he could get a game at the start for whatever reason. If he was 22 or 23 without the increased release clause I'd say it might be worth the risk, but 20 for 65, up to 75 million is too much. Osimhen is by far and away the best striker on the market, the release clause may be big, but for a player of his quality I think it's worth it. Let's also not forget that despite missing a month for afcon, and Napoli having a terrible season, he's still managed 17 goals. 25 years old, a league winner, the backing of Chelsea legends, Osimhen, even for over 100 million is the safer bet.
And also his contract expires in jun 30 2025 which means we can get him for less than 30 million euros.
130-150 Mlns. Release clause cash, chelsea can forget him!
@@ThirdEye... Just bring in vlahovic! Omg why this club is so dumb
@@nomercy411Osimhen is a title winning striker who has more to his game than Vlahovic
@@Iamwhatyousayiam Bring in Toney and Theo Hernandez for the price of Osimhen. Let Napoli keep their player
Both would improve the squad, but osihmen would elevate it more in my opinion. But what do I know
No amount of data will tell me Sesko is better than Osimhen.....
Yes man
Guirassy for 17.5m is a no brainer
I’ve said this countless times, just sign this guy and forget striker options….. give him a 4 year deal. Before he turns 34-35 Jackson would have been a good striker
Osimhen we need
Get us a proven striker, not a project striker....Osimhen is the guy🎉
Jackson will cook... don't spend big on striker Osimhen might ruin the other in our team.
Project striker has 78 goals before turning 21
We need both 📌📌📌
Osimhen is miles ahead of sesko . Sesko won't even reach jackson numbers
When Arsenal comes in for him you will regret
We absolutely do not have time to work on two "project" strikers while trying to confirm top 4 or challenge for the title next season. We already have Jackson who is a promising one. So if there is someone competing with him, I would rather have a lesser talented but more experienced player who we know can deliver what we expect of him.
Osimhen is of course the best of both worlds. But I would rather have someone like Callum Wilson over Sesko. If we can get Toney on a financially favorable deal, even better. Sesko is very talented but unless we are sure he is ready to bag 25 a season for us we should stay away from him (usual benchmark would be 15 but Jackson's already done while being a much better player in general play). I don't think he's ready but I also thought Palmer wasn't ready to start all games for us when he joined so I could be wrong.
Exactly 💯.
Just bring in vlahovic! Omg why is this club so dumb
We already have a young striker in Jackson, and even younger strikers like Deivid, Richards if given more game time would become better than Sesko, so we don't need Sesko. But, even if we needed another striker then we should go for either one of Boniface, Gygkores or Osimhen, those are the only 3 strikers we should be looking at, in my opinion.
Toney too, he just need to find his form again!
Why don't we sign Guirassy. He had a much better season than any striker this year barring Kane. He's 28 so he won't stop Jackson's improvement or block his path into becoming the guy. And if Jackson is in good form he would be fine to sit bench for him. But best of all his release clause is on 17.5m Euros, That's an absolute steal and he'll bring a more experienced striker's knowledge for Jackson to learn off without blocking his path, but if this season is anything to go by, an absolutely lethal goal scorer.
Victor osimhen is the way to go.. No doubt about that. His air dominance and sheer power just suites the premier league. Sesko will be another Timo Werner
We just signed willian estevao but he’s 18 and as per usual we spent 65m on a teen
Do you understand add ons?
He is 17, so only expect him next of next season! He might come train with us during preseason or make a cameo here and there during big games in the stands with the the usual injured gang, Lavia, Fofana and Reece
The only thing we need in front is experience and someone that Jackson can learn from and emulate in the near future. Osimehn ticks those boxes plus he possessed the hallmarks of being even more prolific in the PL.
If spending is not a problem get experience- Osimen or Gyokeres, if it is a problem get a cheaper option like Ivan Toney or Girassy, remember we still have Nkuku, Jackson and academy strikers like Dujuan & Washington. Sesko for me is not what the club needs at the moment. Experience should be prioritized next transfer window.
guirassy is such a good shout. Experienced, scores goals, good hold up play and cheap af.
0 views in 28 seconds bro fell off
😭
I’m so down with not spending big on a ST but we do need need 1
Osimhen up top and put Jackson on the left
Nah i don't see that working. We start Jackson in the cup games and Osimhen in the league and Europe
There is the issue of quality of league and there are also leagues deemed attacking or defensive.
Most clubs will soon be following Chelsea's building model, bring in Sesko he's perfect competition for Jackson who is doing well even of he's not as clinical as we want he's doing good to hold his own and i commend him for it we just need to have faith that the guys will come through and make us proud again success never comes without hard work and sacrifice
I think this comparison is good but you left out a very key parameter which changes everything.
WHAT'S THE QUALITY OF LEAGUE?
You cannot compare the Austrian league to the Italian league
The only gripe with osimenh is the price, we're gonna need to sell players if we wanna get him and idk if that'll do more harm than good for the squad
Any will do💙💙💙🔥🔥🔥
couldn’t agree more ! but i say get them both so we have a one way punch , one off the bench
we have a load of players we can sell to finance it , not just lukaku
I’m fine with just osimhen he is much more proven and experienced, he has the same numbers as sesko while missing a month cause of afcon. He is African and can relate well to Nico, he is expensive this Chelsea. Not to mention he can also be mature and cool headed striker we can rely on big games. We don’t know what would happen if sesko comes and gets crushed by Chelsea fans for underperforming. It’s a risk and I’m tired of buying young risky players. Norway is nowhere near the premier.
Osimhen has being injured this season and missed lots of game. Osimhen is stronger which is what is needed in the prem
Just bring in vlahovic
I suspect there is only one stat that Clearlake will look at.... The cost.
To be fair to Clearlake as far as I remember they’ve never cheaped out on a signing
Clearlake are really not that bad. They just need the right manager that will match their energy.
Clearlake will only chose the player that can sign 7 yrs contract...
The player with high resale value...
Fabrizio confirmed Sesko’s release clause is £55.4m
Chelsea will sign whoever they think Arsenal want most as the criteria, then get it wrong.
Do a video on Marcin Balka
Compare them with Jackson as well. i think what we need a very experienced sturdy striker like we did with Giroud to complement Nkunku and Jackson. Watkins ,Tony or Callum Wilson. Mitrovic is my ideal one but we wont be able to match his salary now.
We have a lot of options to consider: Osimhen, Sesko, Gyokeres and Toney!
I m sure if we send broja to the austrian league he wil score 20 goals or more in a season. Salah was tearing it austria and failed in england until he went to italy to refine his game with roma. I have seen players scoring in france, germany and come to england and be flops, so why should we be signing an untested player when we need experience. Just look at mudryk and u ll understand what i mean, he was a star in ukrainian league much stronger than the austrian league but he is averàge in England
I don't even want another mudryk here
Sesko can only dream of Osimhen's level. Sesko isn't much better than Jackson, he'll end up being another Moratta project.
I don't think Chelsea should sign either. Instead, we shoud recall David Datro Fofana from loan and give him a shot. Also, Jackson's ceiling is so high. Getting someone like Oshimen will hinder his development. But rotating between Fofana and Jackson should be a good idea as it would carry some pressure off Nico's shoulders also allowing Fofana to show what he's about.
well said
nah stop with this bullshit we need experiece , stone killers now in our team we got enought kids and young taletns . time to get some world klassplayer
@@manna_02_ learn to spell.
@@johndawes9337 learn to smd
@johndawes9337leave the spellings and get the message
for me we should get osihmen or play we jackson next season , Washington is doing great why not a chance
What about Victor Gyokerese
Is it worth looking at how strikers from the Bundeliga fare in the EPL compared to strikers from Serie A?
Who are strikers who have moved from the Bundesliga (other than Haaland) who have had great success translating his game? Chelsea did have a young man from the Bundesliga who recently left who struggled to translate his game to the EPL. Their body types are similar too…
Haaland, Aubameyang, Son, Firmino, Dzeko, Mateta?
i don't think we should go after either.
I agree with you,Chelsea should get Sesko and Davis to save costs
I think fullkrug if he would leave dortmund would be good, as it would give us a good alternative to Jackson while also not going to just remove Jackson from the squad
You haven’t taken into account the league’s they are in I think it’s fair to say the Italian league is a tougher league so it’s more challenging for victor!
Plus Osimhen was gone for a whole month plus during the AFCON with Nigeria this season, he could have gotten more than 17 goals.
We need sesko ❤
Come anytime any day osimhen will always scare defender than sesko, mark my word.
Wouldn’t surprise me if oshimen ends up at PSG and we turn to sesko
💀 what’s better a bmw or a go kart
Depends on the purpose. Go kart for a fun race. BMW for a drive to Scotland.
I like Sesko's play style, but I do agree that some of the chances Nico missed are tailor made for a poacher like Osimhen
Osimhen is not a poacher.
Even osimhen miss like nico i watch a lot of Napoli matches he's not good
Sesko or Toney for me, I might even lean towards Toney. Cheap, older than Jackson so doesn't completely replace him, and prem proven. If we get Sesko for 75m he def starts every game he is fit for but Toney for 40, can easily allow Jackson to start a few games without much fuss.
davies could play that lm role poch is wanting to use, id prefer, cheaper prem proven talent, toney, guehi, pickford should be our targets
Sesko is about £50m cheaper and he's younger just get him in, Jackson can play on the lw
One plays in Italy, the other is the only team from Austria most of us know.
RB Leipzig is in Germany…
Nico Jackson will be a menace once he acclimates to the premier league.
Benjamin sesko will be better for Chelsea because will only need converter striker who don't loose much big chances
I would do a player plus the 50 for Sesko. I'm tired of teams exploiting us for the money.
Please Chelsea we don't need you to an other mistake again like we did before to brought Lukaku and Murata Please I need us to bring Benjamin Sesko he is the one we need in our team and go quickly to get Benjamin Sesko without other clubs come over Please
compare gyokeres too
* one two punch
Age and taste of football.... Palmer and sesko plus Jackson and young stars can bring best to Chelsea...
Sesko propaganda
😊sesko for me! But if we want to win champions league, then get both. 😊
Sesko the man
What of Gyokeres?
Unproven
Not coming to Chelsea
Osihmen surely will get 20+ goals with Cold palmer and nkunku Enzo next to him
Why not sign both of them???
Chelsea or any serious EPL club needs four strikers anyway.
These analyses don't mean a thing really. Successful scoring comes from how the whole team gels with each other.
Is anyone seriously asking the question sesko or oshimhen,who is better?? 😂😂😂😂
Lets add Sesko to Jackson and forget Osimhen✅
Love your channel, and your videos in general, but this is a bad one mate. As pointed out by others, this data lacks context. It's not the same doing it in the french\italian league versus the austrian league.
Osimhen is perfeect for Chelsea. 130 mil. Just do it. Overpay. It wouldn't be a Chelsea transfer if they didn't overpay.
dont fully trust data
Not even close. Osimhen is better.
whoever Arsenal dont want is who chelsea can sign.
Are you saying that as a coach, if your club can afford osimhen, you'll buy sesko instead? That's dumb!
If we can afford Osimhen, I’d pick Osimhen. If we need to be wiser with our spending, I would suggest Sesko and a top level left back/gk/defender.
Neither. Chelsea should go for Vangelis Pavlidis from AZ alkamaar. He is the most 3rd most inform striker in europe after harry kane and serouh guiraasy.
Is he around 20-27 age range, proven in Europe, in a top 5 league, and has been consistently good in both ligue 1 and serie A? Osimhen is our best bet.
@@jothekami5328 believe me. I was down for osimeh month's ago until i saw his peformance in Africa cup of nations. he had a terrible competion. he scored 10 goals in the AFCON qualifiers but just 2 goals in the actual competitons. On top of that, he was missing sitters after sitters and even the coach was playing different strikers after the quarter finals of the coompetition.
why buy a striker? stick with what we have
Why do you compare victor with useles people
Šeško without any doubt. 3 times cheaper, younger and not injury prone
Ohsimen is a goal scorer, but...just like lukaku...hes ermmm not technically gifted imo.
Seskonie technically gifted but not as prolific in goal
Comparing Osimhen like Lukaku mean being in a world without football, or just a Brexit one!
Just bring in vlahovic
People must stop shitting on Lukaku. He is a damn good striker. Tuchel ruined him and the argument went too far with egos clashing. He expected him to be a playmaker but we all know he doesn't have the safest first touch. Neither does Oshimhen that's why Toney is the safest bet. Both our wingers including Palmer could play off him.
PLEASE USE THE MONEY AMD BUY SESKO AND DAVIS.
Oshimen v Gyokeres v Toney
Sesko he is very good
I feel like a healthy osimhen is clear
Osimhen is far better ... Strong and fast .. someone who is clinical infront of the goal post .. there's isn't any comparison here
You just lied about osimhen
Why because one is experienced enough but cost a lot of money, while the other cost less but is inexperienced. To save us the trouble. Buy someone who is experienced enough and cost less money. Someone like toney or wilson
Just bring in vlahovic! Omg why this club is so dumb
No guy why?
Ivan Toney for me
We need gyokores
Osimhen is playing in a harder league for strikers.
Osimhen all the way.
even jm rate osimhen highly..his ball control and finishing better than lukaku
None of them, geez 🤦🏾♂️
U want to know my choice. Fine between osimhen or sesko. I would choose... Neither.
Just bring in vlahovic
Chelsea has to have 2 strikers. It’s stupid to rely on only 1 striker
Nope
Chelsea would never spend big for Osimhen . He is 25 already
Sesko for me. Why pay 80m+ and Lukaku for Oshimen. That's insane money.
We know you've been pushing Sesko agenda for a while now, so this vid was always compromised, but the comments did not disappoint , we need experience and Sesko is banging in the Bundesliga while Osimhen has done across multiple leagues
When I see victor l sow King drogba