The Exiled Prophet, Part 11: The Seventy Weeks Prophecy (Daniel

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 48

  • @joannaencarnacion544
    @joannaencarnacion544 3 місяці тому +7

    SHABBAT SHALOM 🙌🏽

  • @danasalomon3721
    @danasalomon3721 2 місяці тому

    Upvote for putting thorough analysis on the table. Comparison of viewpoints. This was challenging to research and much appreciated.

  • @marijakoceva4359
    @marijakoceva4359 3 місяці тому +1

    Thank you 🙏 It all makes sense. May God continue to bless you

  • @Psalm-119
    @Psalm-119 3 місяці тому +8

    Shabbat Shalom 🤗

  • @safetyfirst1484
    @safetyfirst1484 3 місяці тому +2

    Shabbat Shalom. There is of course the contention that Messiah's ministry was in fact 70 weeks long and not 3.5 years, as a 3.5 year ministry would mean Messiah having to spend 4 passover's in Jerusalem the 4th being His crucifixion. This 70 week ministry would render John 6:4 a lie and an addition to scripture as postulated by Michael Rood and Nehemiah Gordon.

  • @marcchitwood2352
    @marcchitwood2352 3 місяці тому +2

    Have you considered that the desolation of the temple is Gods judgment on the corrupt levitical priesthood of Yeshua’s day? Matthew 23:38 - referring to the rending of the temple veil which exposes a holy of holies with a missing Ark of the covenant. The ultimate ‘wizard of Oz’ moment for them (there was nothing behind the curtain). On what mercy seat were they sprinkling the blood of atonement? It was the unjust murder of the just Son of God that was their undoing - Colossians 2:15. By an act of total non violence on His part, Yeshua strips the religious rulers of their power. They committed a miscarriage of justice for everyone - even Rome to see. The events surrounding the crucifixion and the resurrection establish the Deuteronomy 18:19 prophecy - where God promises to judge those who do not receive Yeshua’s words. So the 70 years do not have to extend past Yeshua’s resurrection. I do not see the desolator as Rome although that is a common view.

  • @tomference4618
    @tomference4618 3 місяці тому +1

    ...some interesting views presented over a "couple" of timelines out of which considerably exist.
    It is my opinion that all presented only manifests more "confusion" and fails to aid, or point to a direction on which to build on.
    Of course, the lessons learned can be of application to our continued learning efforts and study of scripture.

  • @carstenoelke3507
    @carstenoelke3507 3 місяці тому +2

    First of all: Daniel chapter 9 is not a vision! A prophecy, yes, but not a vision as like Daniel reported in chapter 2, 7, 8, and 10. In Daniel 9 the angel Gabriel received a word of god and then visited Daniel to tell him this word.
    Next point:
    Daniel points to the vision in Daniel 8, where he met the angel Gabriel the first time. Also Gabriel told Daniel, carefully listen to the word, so he can understand the vision (in Daniel 8, because Daniel didnt understand the vision in Daniel 8 (Daniel 8, 27).
    Next point:
    In the origin scripture there is a so called *Tashuv* between the 7 weeks and the 62 weeks frames. This *Tashuv* meant to Daniel to return back to the starting point in order to calculate the 62 weeks. Therefore the seven weeks will be counted twice, as you mentioned. But it is our own thinking, which let us doubt about that, because we are used to think linear about times and timeframes. It's only our thinking, that let us calculate with 490 years. But Gabriel never mentioned 490 years. He didn't teach Daniel to calculate 490 years. He just taught to calculate 7 weeks and 62 weeks. Also Gabriel never mentioned 69 weeks, so therefore I doubt, if it is correct to calculate with 69 weeks at all. Gabriel didn't seperate all three timeframes with no reason, so we should stay only at his three timeframes and avoid adding 490 years or 69 weeks into this.
    Final point for this time:
    I'm wondering, why it is so, that everyone seems missing the biggest issue of the second interpretation. 🤔
    It starts with a decret of Artaxerxes in 457 BC (a german interpretation by Dr. Roger Liebi actually takes a decret of Artaxerxes in 445 BC and calculates 69 weeks with 360 days/year and then divides the equation with a 365 days/year. But after that there are only 68 weeks left, one week is missing after that calculation.🤭🤭🤭)
    But here is the big issue with the decret of Artaxerxes: Daniel was supposed to understand the vision in Dan. 8 with the ram and the male goat and the little horn and the 2300 evenings and mornings. And Gabriel himself told Daniel, that he came to help Daniel for a better understanding. And he also told Daniel to listen carefully to the word, which Gabriel is about to preach. Therefore Daniel should have been able to fix the beginning point of the 70 weeks at 605 BC and could be able to calculate the 7 and the 62 weeks. And by that said he also could evaluate the seven weeks, that they were fullfilled by Cyrus and so he could see, that the prophecy really is attended by god.
    But if we fix the beginning point of the 70 weeks by the decret of Artaxerxes in 457 or 445 BC, so how could Daniel have been able to calculate these timeperiods? I mean, Daniel received this prophecy of the seven weeks in the year 539/538 BC. The decret of Artaxerxes appeared at least 82 years/92 years after Daniel died. This might have been completly impossible, because Daniel couldn't know, when Artaxerxes will drop his decret. For me, this is the biggest issue of that kind of interpretation. The forthcoming word (dabar) is given to Jeremia. It is a word (dabar) of god, not of man.^^ Regard Esra 6, 14 - 15:
    "And the Elders of the Jews build and it went forth because of the prophecies of the prophets Haggai and Zaccariah, the son of Iddosh, and they build and finished it *according to the order of the God of Israel* and according to the order of Darius, Cyrus and Arthaxerxes." I find it very interesting, that the order of the three kings were mentioned in one sentence, but were seperated from the order of god. Therefore I more likely think, that the order of god is the right way to calculate the 70 weeks, but not the randomly picked out decret of Artaxerxes.^^
    Also the annointed one, who should be cut off and will have nothing anymore (or will not be anymore) that absolutely does not fit to Jesus. Yes, Jesus was punished and crucified, I got it, but he rose from the dead and is still alive today and everything's belongs to him. Dan. 9 isn't about Jesus at all. In my opinion this kind of interpretation is completly wrong Therefore I'd prefer the first interpretation with a few changes, but yeah.^^

  • @Ecc1213
    @Ecc1213 3 місяці тому +2

    40 years is NOT an arbitrary length of time (to pass between the resurrection and the destruction of Jerusalem).
    Also, a biblical prophetic month DOES have 30 days, you can calculate it in Genesis:
    Gen 7:11 In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.
    Gen 7:24 And the waters prevailed upon the earth an hundred and fifty days.
    Gen 8:4 And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat.

  • @Charles73358
    @Charles73358 3 місяці тому +1

    Amen brother you are teaching the truth thanks for not placing a pause or a gap in the 70th week prophecy.
    But one thing that you said I don't agree with you said that the Roman Army didn't place a literal idol of the Abomination of desolation in the Temple but if you read the writings Flavius Josephus the war of the Jews Josephus wrote that the Roman Army along with Titus brought into the holy of Holies their Roman ensigns or Flags and pledged their allegiance to the ensigns.
    And Titus also sacrificed a pig an Ox and a Ram in the Temple
    The reason Caesar Titus and Antiochus Epiphanies share all the same epithets is because both men set up a seemingly identical abomination that causes desolation in the Temple! In 168 B.C. Antiochus Epiphanies set up an idol of a foreign god in the Temple (2 Macc 6:1-2) and sacrificed a pig in the Temple as well (1 Macc 1:59; Wars 1.1.2). This act is called “a desolating sacrilege” in 1 Macc 1:54 and “the abomination that causes desolation” in Daniel 11:31.
    Titus did the same thing! In A.D. 70 while the Temple was inflames the Roman army brought the ensigns (military flags that were idols of Caesar and Rome) to the Temple’s eastern gate and offered sacrifices to them (Wars 6.6.1). There were three animals that were likely sacrificed at this time, a sheep, an ox and a pig; as these were the three sacrifices made in the practice of suovetaurilia, the customary sacrifice made for land purification done especially during the destruction of Temples (Tacitus, Histories 4.53). Did you catch that? Like Antiochus Epiphanies during the first abomination that cause desolation (Dan 11:31), Titus ALSO sacrificed a pig and presided over the worship of foreign gods in the Temple! Since both Titus and Antiochus Epiphanies are responsible for the abomination that causes desolation it is not surprising that both men are given all the same epithets throughout the Bible and Jewish tradition."
    Titus also brought into the Temple two Harlots and had intercourse with them on the altar over the scroll mocking God
    God bless 🙌 🙏

  • @PrairieChristianOutreach
    @PrairieChristianOutreach 3 місяці тому +2

    Nice study. Well done.

  • @RL.777
    @RL.777 3 місяці тому +2

    BTW the Esseans calculated a 360 day per year based on their records in the dead sea scrolls

  • @OceanView420
    @OceanView420 3 місяці тому +5

    Wonderful teaching on a complex subject, thank you ❤

  • @kellyd4221
    @kellyd4221 11 днів тому

    If you count the feasts that the disciples count, the Messiah's ministry was 70 weeks.

  • @carstenoelke3507
    @carstenoelke3507 3 місяці тому +2

    Okay, thank you very much for this teaching. I'd prefer the first interpretation with a few changes. My timeline would be as following:
    605 to 556 BC = 7 weeks/49 years - Cyrus appeared, the greater horn of the ram (Dan.8) grew forth.
    605 to 171 BC = 62 weeks/434 years - Antiochus IV. Epiphany appeared, the little horn, which comes forth out of one of the four large horns of the male goat (Dan. 8). He is the annointed one, who was cut off after the 62 weeks timeperiod. The key to understand, why the 70th week is still yet to come, is Daniel 11, 21 to 45 and Daniel chapter 8, 13 and 14 and 26.
    Here is why:
    Daniel 11, 21 to 45 is describing three mayor periods.
    *First timeperiod*
    Daniel 11, 21 to 32 is describing Antiochus IV. Epiphany. According to Rev. 17, 10 is Antiochus that *one, who is*. But these Verses in Dan.11, 21 to 32 have a second meaning: They are also describing a second king of the north, who we call the antichrist. According to Rev. 17, 10 he is the *other one, who has yet to come*. He will do the exact same things, as Antiochus did (abomination of desoltion). But what's different between Antiochus and the antichrist is described in Dan.11, 36 to 45. These things will occure in the 70th week. So therefore Dan. 11, 21 - 32 is the first of the three timeperiods, but also the third timeperiod.
    *Second timeperiod*
    Dan. 11, 33 - 35 describes a timeperiod, which started in 168 BC, the time of Maccabeas, and will endure until the end of times. According to Dan. 8, 13 - 14 I believe, it will endure 2300 years, starting from that point, when Antiochus abolished and prohibited the daily offerings (168 BC) and will end in that time in the very end, when the gentiles will start to trample down the holy place, or so to speak the holy city of Jerusalem, for 42 months. I believe, that the frame of 2300 evenings and mornings could also stand symbolicly for 2300 years.
    *Third timeperiod*
    Daniel 11, 36 - 45 describes the Antichrist and the 70th week. But keep in mind, that the description of the antichrist also begins in Dan. 11, 21 - 32. According to Rev. 17, 11 is he the eighth (king "of the north") and is also one of the seven (kings "of the north").
    (The five, who already have been fallen, were Alexander the Great and the first four Diadochean Kings, Antiochus is the one, *who is* (but that just means the status quo of the prophecy, not literal a living king; because Daniels prophecy is interrupted after the 62nd weeks and will run again, when the 2300 evenings and mornings are fullfilled and the 70th week will start), the antichrist is the *other one*, who has yet to come and stay for a short while (42 months, three and a half years).
    The antichrist will be the eighth king and will also be one of the seven . That doesn't mean, that the antichrist already lived and died and will rise again, but it means exactly, what I've told before. His description begins in Dan.11, 21 - 32, but those verses also refer to Antiochus. He ist the seventh of seven kings of the north (seleucid kings), who are described in Dan. 11, 5 to 32. Otherwise: Dan. 11, 5 - 32 describes in summery seven identificable seleucid kings as king of the north and Dan. 11, 36 - 45 describes an 8th king of the north, whom's description starts in Dan. 11, 21 together with Antiochus. Therefore is the antichrist the eigth king and is one of the seven.

    • @carstenoelke3507
      @carstenoelke3507 Місяць тому

      @@Popo-br8xq Which horn is Alexander the Great supposed to be? The little horn?
      I don't think so, because Alexander the Great is the first prominent horn of the male goat, which means the kings of Jawan/Greece. He was the one, who defeated the medo-persian empire.

    • @Popo-br8xq
      @Popo-br8xq Місяць тому +1

      @@carstenoelke3507 sorry I misread what you wrote and thought you were saying the great horn that broke is Antiochus IV. Total misunderstanding. I agree with u that Antiochus is the little horn. 😅👍🏼

    • @carstenoelke3507
      @carstenoelke3507 Місяць тому

      @@Popo-br8xq Never mind. My comment was way too long, that doesn't make me wonder, if someone could misread. 😄😄😄

    • @Popo-br8xq
      @Popo-br8xq Місяць тому +1

      @@carstenoelke3507 lol yeah, I was reading through it all, but I forgot wat u said in the beginning 😭

    • @carstenoelke3507
      @carstenoelke3507 Місяць тому

      @@Popo-br8xq Hahaha, I sometimes forget my point while writing such long comments. 😂😂😂

  • @JoRandle
    @JoRandle Місяць тому

    Masoretic verses Septuagint. - Jesus and the Apostles quoted from the Septuagint, which was their version of the Tanoak at that timeline. The Septuagint states otherwise.

  • @bonniem.pederson7105
    @bonniem.pederson7105 Місяць тому

    Just Hebrew is not linear but, (in my thinking) in waves like the ocean, The Lord Weill come back and restore his faithful
    We start out in faith, but all fall short, We sin repent, start again and forward we try again only to stumble again.
    Yes this is an awful rendition but from all the Law 119 Ministries have presented I believe In a better understand now🙏🎚️👍👋

  • @rosegarcia2651
    @rosegarcia2651 3 місяці тому +1

    When was the flood of Daniel 9:26?

    • @marcchitwood2352
      @marcchitwood2352 3 місяці тому

      The Bible is all about justice. The goal of Torah is the proper administration of justice and the Levitical priesthood failed in this regard. They desecrated the temple with their unjust acts so Gods justice overtakes them in a flood (an idiom for ‘judgement’ - ie a ‘flood of justice’. See Isaiah 1:7, Amos 5:7-9. It was the same with Noah’s flood. Read all of Matthew 23 and it will make sense. Hope this is helpful.

  • @tdrtdr2
    @tdrtdr2 2 місяці тому

    THIS IS ABSOLUTE PROOF THAT SOLOMON BUILT TWO TEMPLES! ONE HE BUILT IN MAJESTY AND ONE HE BUILT IN SECRET!
    IN THIS SCRIPTURE SOLOMON IS DEDICATING AND SANCTIFYING THE FIRST TEMPLE:
    1 Kings 8 (KJV)
    ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
    ¹ Then Solomon assembled the elders of Israel, and all the heads of the tribes, the chief of the fathers of the children of Israel, unto king Solomon in Jerusalem, that they might bring up the ark of the covenant of the LORD out of the city of David, which is Zion.
    ² And all the men of Israel assembled themselves unto king Solomon at the feast in the month Ethanim, which is the seventh month.
    ³ And all the elders of Israel came, and the priests took up the ark.
    ⁴ And they brought up the ark of the LORD, and the tabernacle of the congregation, and all the holy vessels that were in the tabernacle, even those did the priests and the Levites bring up.
    ⁵ And king Solomon, and all the congregation of Israel, that were assembled unto him, were with him before the ark, sacrificing sheep and oxen, that could not be told nor numbered for multitude.
    ⁶ And the priests brought in the ark of the covenant of the LORD unto his place, into the oracle of the house, to the most holy place, even under the wings of the cherubims.
    ⁷ For the cherubims spread forth their two wings over the place of the ark, and the cherubims covered the ark and the staves thereof above.
    ⁸ And they drew out the staves, that the ends of the staves were seen out in the holy place before the oracle, and they were not seen without: and there they are unto this day.
    ⁹ There was nothing in the ark save the two tables of stone, which Moses put there at Horeb, when the LORD made a covenant with the children of Israel, when they came out of the land of Egypt.
    ¹⁰ And it came to pass, when the priests were come out of the holy place, that the cloud filled the house of the LORD,
    ¹¹ So that the priests could not stand to minister because of the cloud: for the glory of the LORD had filled the house of the LORD.
    ¹² Then spake Solomon, The LORD said that he would dwell in the thick darkness.
    ¹³ I have surely built thee an house to dwell in, a settled place for thee to abide in for ever.
    ¹⁴ And the king turned his face about, and blessed all the congregation of Israel: (and all the congregation of Israel stood;)
    ¹⁵ And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Israel, which spake with his mouth unto David my father, and hath with his hand fulfilled it, saying,
    ¹⁶ Since the day that I brought forth my people Israel out of Egypt, I chose no city out of all the tribes of Israel to build an house, that my name might be therein; but I chose David to be over my people Israel
    .
    .
    .
    SO WHY IS HE SANCTIFYING AND DEDICATING THIS OTHER "TEMPLE" IN A CAVE?
    2Mac.2
    [1] It is also found in the records, that Jeremy the prophet commanded them that were carried away to take of the fire, as it hath been signified:
    [2] And how that the prophet, having given them the law, charged them not to forget the commandments of the Lord, and that they should not err in their minds, when they see images of silver and gold, with their ornaments.
    [3] And with other such speeches exhorted he them, that the law should not depart from their hearts.
    [4] It was also contained in the same writing, that the prophet, being warned of God, commanded the TABERNACLE AND THE ARK to go with him, as he went forth into the mountain, where Moses climbed up, and saw the heritage of God.
    [5] And when Jeremy came thither, HE FOUND AN HOLLOW CAVE, WHEREIN HE LAID THE TABERNACLE, AND THE ARK, and the altar of incense, and so stopped the door.
    [6] And some of those that followed him came to mark the way, but they could not find it.
    [7] Which when Jeremy perceived, he blamed them, saying, As for that place, IT SHALL BE UNKNOWN UNTIL THE TIME THAT GOD GATHER HIS PEOPLE AGAIN together, and receive them unto mercy.
    [8] Then shall the Lord shew them these things, and the glory of the Lord shall appear, and the cloud also, as it was shewed under Moses, and as when Solomon desired that the place might be HONOURABLY SANCTIFIED.
    [9] It was also declared, that he being wise offered the sacrifice of DEDICATION, and of the FINISHING OF THE TEMPLE.
    [10] And as when Moses prayed unto the Lord, the fire came down from heaven, and consumed the sacrifices: even so prayed Solomon also, and the fire came down from heaven, and consumed the burnt offerings.
    SO THIS IS A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT DEDICATION CEREMONY IN A CAVE SOMEWHERE!
    And it says that the offering was accepted by God...
    ...BECAUSE THIS SPOT WHERE THE ARK OF THE COVENANT IS BEING HELD RIGHT NOW!!
    .... DIRECTLY UNDER WHERE JESUS DIED AND HAS THE BLOOD OF JESUS ON THE MERCY SEAT OF THE ARK OF THE COVENANT DOING THE JOB OF THE ATONEMENT.....
    It was His blood going down the earthquake crack in Daniel chapter 9 verse 24 to 27 which causes the daily sacrifice to cease... WE DIDN'T NEED TO SACRIFICE LAMBS ANYMORE BECAUSE HE WAS THE FINAL SACRIFICE HEBREWS CHAPTER 7 AND 8
    So when people read Daniel chapter 9 verse 24 through 27 many mistake that for the abomination of desolation... But it's the blood of Jesus that makes the blood of lambs unnecessary therefore it was Jesus blood that caused the daily sacrifice to cease...
    Daniel 9 (KJV)
    ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
    ²⁵ Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.
    ²⁶ And after threescore and two weeks shall MESSIAH be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
    ²⁷ And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and IN THE MIDST OF THE WEEK HE SHALL CAUSE THE SACRIFICE AND THE OBLATION TO CEASE, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
    .
    NOW WE TURN TO DANIEL CHAPTER 11 VERSE 31 AND THAT'S WHEN THE ANTICHRIST COMES IN AND CAUSES THE DAILY SACRIFICE THAT JESUS BLOOD IS PROVIDING FOR US RIGHT NOW TO CEASE!
    “And arms shall stand on his part, and they shall pollute the sanctuary of strength, and shall take away the daily sacrifice, and they shall place the abomination that maketh desolate.”
    - Daniel 11:31 (KJV)
    HE TAKES CONTROL OF THE ARK OF THE COVENANT AND SETS HIMSELF UP AS GOD TO BE GOD AND THAT'S THE ABOMINATION OF DESOLATION WHICH YOU'RE GOING TO SEE NEXT YEAR!
    MATTHEW 24:15
    “When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:)”
    - Matthew 24:15 (KJV)

    • @tdrtdr2
      @tdrtdr2 2 місяці тому

      A) 1 Kings 8:1-13 The Ark of the Covenant DEDICATED in 1st Temple
      B) The Ark is moved because of abominations Ezekiel 7:20
      C) the Ark is hidden in Mount Moriah AND DEDICATED IN ANOTHER TEMPLE 2 MACCABEES 2:9
      D) THATS WHERE IT IS DWELLING IN THICK DARKNESS RIGHT NOW 1 Kings 8:12,13
      D1) THATS THE SAME SPOT YESHUA DIED! Which means He played The HIGH PRIEST OF THE ORDER OF MELCHIZEDEK AND ANOINTED HIS OWN ALTAR!
      HE did not just give His only begotten Son to die BUT HE ALSO PREPARED THE SPOT TO BE HOLY 2,000 YEARS EARLIER WITH ABRAHAM AND THEN AGAIN BY HIDING THE ARK UNDER THE SPOT SO HIS BLOOD WOULD FALL ON THE MERCY SEAT
      E) Yah ALWAYS tells Prophets before He does anything... Where is the prophecy concerning the Ark of the Covenant?
      WHERE DOES THE BIBLE SAY IT WILL BE PUT IN A TEMPLE SOMEWHERE??
      IT DOESN'T!!
      THE PROPHECY IS IT WILL BE HANDED OVER AS A SPOIL OF WAR
      Ezekiel 7:21,22 AND DANIEL 11:31!
      .
      And:
      Psalms 94 (KJV)
      ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
      ²⁰ Shall the THRONE OF LAWLESSNESS have fellowship with thee, which frameth mischief by a law?
      👑YESHUA DOESN'T SHARE THE THRONE WITH THE LAWLESS ONE
      .. Sort of like when the President of the United States gets off AIR FORCE 1 it changes CALL SIGNS to let everyone know he's not on board anymore...
      THE ARK OF THE COVENANT BECOMES THE THRONE OF LAWLESSNESS when the antichrist takes control.
      And the "mischievous law" will be the law mandating THE MARK👑
      ²¹ They gather themselves together against the soul of the righteous, and condemn the innocent blood.
      ²² But the LORD is my defence; and my God is the rock of my refuge.
      .
      .
      THE PROPHECY SAYS THE NEXT THING TO HAPPEN TO THE ARK OF THE COVENANT IS THE ANTICHRIST WILL TAKE CONTROL OF IT!
      .
      You started from the false premise that there has to be a temple built in order to have the abomination of desolation because you need an altar for that and you never once stopped to think that the altar ALREADY EXISTS...
      .
      When you steal this and write a book just remember where you heard it...
      We have LOTS MORE RESEARCH TOO... you have just been given what this limited forum allows

    • @tdrtdr2
      @tdrtdr2 2 місяці тому

      AND IT'S STILL THE HOLIEST SPOT ON EARTH BECAUSE IT HOUSES THE ARK OF THE COVENANT DIRECTLY UNDER WHERE JESUS DIED!
      What if I could show you FROM THE BIBLE that God came down in the form of a man named Jesus and played as HIS OWN HIGH PRIEST OF THE ORDER OF MELCHIZEDEK shed his blood INTO the holy of holies so He could ANOINT THE MOST HOLY (Daniel 9:24-27) Ark of the Covenant... DIRECTLY UNDER THE SPOT JESUS DIED JUST LIKE THE BIBLE SAYS!
      ... SO THAT GOD'S WILL COULD BE DONE IN THE EARTH AS IT IS IN HEAVEN? ... Just like Jesus prayed...
      And the moment that the blood going on to the Ark of the Covenant caused the Lamb's blood over on the Temple mount on the OTHER ALTAR to become desolate and obsolete. Because Hebrews 7 says that Jesus was the final sacrifice.
      What if I could show you that the blood of Jesus Is providing a daily sacrifice for you RIGHT NOW on that Ark of the Covenant directly under the post hole where He died?
      And then what if I could show you God is not going to build another Temple of brick and stone because he doesn't have to. He already has the Ark of the Covenant in the holiest place on Earth which was directly under the spot Jesus died. What we consider the holiest of holy places in some majestic temple on some Golden Mountain is our own MAN-MADE idea of what's holy ....
      HOLY SIMPLY MEANS TO BE SET APART.
      What if I could show you that God, with some help with from Jeremiah, moved the holy of holies from the Temple of Solomon into a cave along with the Tabernacle of David and some of the other Temple artifacts like the Table of shewbread?
      WHAT IF I COULD SHOW YOU WHERE IT SAYS THESE THINGS WOULD BE RESTORED ONE DAY IN THE END TIMES?
      What if we could show you the blood evidence that proves all of this to be true? And then what if we can show you the scripture which supports the blood evidence?
      We have all this information!
      .
      This means God did not JUST give his only begotten son to die for you BUT HE ALSO prepared the place for him to die so that his blood would not fall onto the ground to be trampled under the foot of man as an unworthy sacrifice!
      ACCORDING TO THE BIBLE SOLOMON BUILT A SECRET TEMPLE AND ITS BEING USED BY GOD TODAY!
      SO NO NEED TO BUILD ANOTHER TEMPLE!
      THE PHYSICAL MANIFESTATION OF THE HOLY OF HOLIES IN THE EARTH HAS ALREADY BEEN FULFILLED:
      In First Kings when it records Solomon building a temple of majesty for God it also describes a place that he builds for God where God can DWELL IN THICK DARKNESS.
      HERE'S A LITTLE PREVIEW:
      👑🙏 IN THE SCRIPTURE THAT FOLLOWS WE SEE SOLOMON CELEBRATING THE TEMPLE THAT HE BUILT FOR GOD!🙏👑
      1 Kings 8 (KJV)
      ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
      ¹ Then Solomon assembled the elders of Israel, and all the heads of the tribes, the chief of the fathers of the children of Israel, unto king Solomon in Jerusalem, that they might bring up the ark of the covenant of the LORD out of the city of David, which is Zion...
      ⁵ And king Solomon, and all the congregation of Israel, that were assembled unto him, were with him before the ark, sacrificing sheep and oxen, that could not be told nor numbered for multitude....
      ¹⁰ And it came to pass, when the priests were come out of the holy place, that the cloud filled the house of the LORD,
      ¹¹ So that the priests could not stand to minister because of the cloud: FOR THE GLORY OF THE LORD HAD FILLED THE HOUSE OF THE LORD.
      🙏👑SEE? THIS WAS A MAJESTIC PLACE THAT SOLOMON BUILT FOR GOD TO DWELL... But we also learn that Solomon built ANOTHER place ... A SECRET PLACE WHERE HE COULD DWELL IN THICK DARKNESS👑🙏
      1 Kings 8 (KJV)
      ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
      ¹² Then spake Solomon, The LORD said that he would dwell in the thick darkness.
      ¹³ I have surely built thee an house to dwell in, a settled place for thee to abide in for ever.
      👑🙏 HERE'S THE SMOKING GUN! RIGHT HERE IS PROOF THAT THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE A THIRD TEMPLE BUILT!🙏👑
      This is Solomon talking about the temple he prepared for God.
      In this passage God says that he's going to dwell in thick darkness... AND SOLOMON SAYS HE PREPARED A PLACE FOR HIM TO DO JUST THAT!
      What else do we have to support this?
      Ezekiel 7 (KJV)
      ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
      ⁵ Thus saith the Lord GOD; An evil, an only evil, behold, is come.
      ⁶ An end is come, THE END IS COME: it watcheth for thee; behold, it is come.
      ²⁰ As for the beauty of his ornament, he set it in majesty: but they made the images of their abominations and of their detestable things therein: therefore have I set it far from them.
      ²¹ And I will give it into the hands of the strangers for a prey, and to the wicked of the earth for a spoil; and they shall pollute it.
      ²² My face will I turn also from them, and they shall pollute my secret place: for the robbers shall enter into it, and DEFILE it.
      👑🙏 YOU CAN'T JUST FILE SOMETHING UNLESS GOD MADE IT HOLY FIRST, RIGHT?🙏👑
      SO WE SEE THAT SOLOMON PREPARED A SPECIAL PLACE AND GOD MOVED THE ARK OF THE COVENANT INTO IT. HOW DID HE GET IT THERE?
      2Mac.2
      [1] It is also found in the records, that Jeremy the prophet commanded them that were carried away to take of the fire, as it hath been signified:
      [2] And how that the prophet, having given them the law, charged them not to forget the commandments of the Lord, and that they should not err in their minds, when they see images of silver and gold, with their ornaments.
      [3] And with other such speeches exhorted he them, that the law should not depart from their hearts.
      [4] It was also contained in the same writing, that the prophet, being warned of God, commanded THE TABERNACLE AND THE ARK to go with him, as he went forth into the mountain, where Moses climbed up, and saw the heritage of God.
      [5] And when Jeremy came thither, he found an hollow cave, wherein he laid the TABERNACLE, AND THE ARK, and the altar of incense, and so stopped the door.
      [6] And some of those that followed him came to mark the way, but they could not find it.
      [7] Which when Jeremy perceived, he blamed them, saying, AS FOR THAT PLACE, IT SHALL BE UNKNOWN UNTIL THE TIME THAT GOD GATHER HIS PEOPLE AGAIN TOGETHER, and receive them unto mercy.
      [8] THEN SHALL THE LORD SHEW THEM THESE THINGS, and the glory of the Lord shall appear, and the cloud also, as it was shewed under Moses, and as when Solomon desired that the place might be honourably sanctified.
      AND WE SAW IN EZEKIEL 7 THAT IT WAS GOING TO BE TURNED OVER AS A SPOIL TO THE GENTILES. IT DOESN'T SAY ANYTHING ABOUT BUILDING ANOTHER TEMPLE... And we have the words of Daniel chapter 11 to support this:
      “And arms shall stand on his part, and they shall pollute the sanctuary of strength, and shall take away the daily sacrifice, and they shall place the abomination that maketh desolate.”
      - Daniel 11:31 (KJV)
      So while everybody is talking about sacrificing red heifers and they're trying to figure out where they're going to put the crane up on the Temple Mount to knock down the dome of the Rock SUDDEN DESTRUCTION IS GOING TO COME UPON THEM AS THE ABOMINATION OF DESOLATION IS GOING TO OCCUR DIRECTLY UNDER THE SPOT WHERE JESUS DIED BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE THE HOLY OF HOLIES IS ACCORDING TO GOD
      . These blue slides show the Hebrew word play and how Solomon built a temple and Majesty but he also built a SECRET PLACE... on a lower level
      .
      .
      Go to the pinned comment on my page to find out more!

  • @timjones1583
    @timjones1583 3 місяці тому

    The blood of YESHUA anointed the most holy place during the crucifixtion. We have a witness, John, The earth quaked the rocks rent and Yeshua's blood fell down the earthquake crack and anoited the ark of the covenant.

  • @tellittotheworld857
    @tellittotheworld857 3 місяці тому +5

    This makes no sense.

    • @ellenlefavour628
      @ellenlefavour628 3 місяці тому +2

      I fell asleep, but it is Shabbat so I guess it’s ok. Shabbat shalom. Challenging scriptures for sure.

    • @suzannemoore6115
      @suzannemoore6115 3 місяці тому +1

      Yep

    • @frankemann81
      @frankemann81 3 місяці тому +2

      ​@@praiseyahuah yes 2 meanings indeed. A pashat and pashar. The pashat is the 70 week ministry of Yeshua (perfectly following the feast days in John you can see this from the time Yeshua leaves the wilderness) or the acceptable year of the Lord. And then you have the pashar meaning that has a few different theories, I'm not sure which one I side with there but do know the rapture theory is not it.

    • @lutonia
      @lutonia Місяць тому

      How do you figure?

  • @thabilldozer
    @thabilldozer 3 місяці тому +1

    OK, I was somewhat OK with this up until the 16 minute mark of the teaching. Nice to see that contextual reference to what Leviticus chapter 5 says is tossed aside. What you claim it is about and what it actually says are 2 totally different things. Read verse one again.
    "When any of you sin in that you have heard a public adjuration to testify and, although able to testify as one who has seen or learned of the matter, do not speak up, you are subject to punishment".
    What this is saying is let's say that I know someone who got away with robbing a store at gunpoint, and I do not take action to make sure that they are brought to justice I am therefore an accomplice to their action by my inaction, are guilty, and should be punished.
    But, that is not the only sin mentioned in Leveitcus 5. There is the touching of unclean things, and making rash oaths. There are also other remedies mentioned in Leviticus 5 that you did not mention.
    And, that is where I stopped watching. At that point anything else you were going to say was tarnished by your mishandling of scripture.
    Also, and I am not sure how much more of this particular offense I can take from 119. His name is NOT YEshua. His name is YAHoshua. When you remove the YAH from his name you remove his connection to YAHweh. YAHoshua and YEshua do not even have the same meaning in Hebrew.
    YEshua is a construct of Rome. Rome sought to remove the power of Moshiach by changing his name. There is everlasting power in the name of YAHoshua ben YAHweh. Joshua son of God. There is absolutely no power in the name YEshua.

    • @TheKingsComingAlefTav
      @TheKingsComingAlefTav 3 місяці тому +1

      Could you imagine a baby mispronouncing his dad's name or just calling him dad or father 🤷🏼‍♂️

    • @TheKingsComingAlefTav
      @TheKingsComingAlefTav 3 місяці тому

      I can't take much more of this offense My knowledge so supersedes yours You're so pathetic! That's what you sound like Go sit down for a while

    • @RL.777
      @RL.777 3 місяці тому +3

      I think you are arguing on wrong channel nothing you speaking of has anything to do with the topic of this teaching

    • @April4YHWH
      @April4YHWH 3 місяці тому +3

      From the transcript:
      "... the third item is to *atone for iniquity* this phrase is found in many places in scripture when people sin they must *bear their iniquity* meaning they must suffer the consequences of their sin we see this in Leviticus 5 Leviticus 5:1 if anyone sins in that he hears a public adjuration to testify and though he is a witness whether he has seen or come to know the matter yet does not speak he shall *bear his iniquity* a sinner must *bear his iniquity* he must bear punishment from God because of his sin however if atonement is provided for the iniquity then the punishment is also removed Leviticus 5:6 he shall bring to Yahweh as his compensation for the sin that he has committed a female from the flock a lamb or a goat for a sin offering and the priest shall make atonement for him for his sin many times this atonement for iniquity is provided by sacrifice as we just read sacrifice for iniquity is also..."
      Could it be that further consideration is merited? From experience, throwing out a teaching for "mishandling of scripture" (as you put it) can be just as careless as what you are accusing your brother of doing. I watched to the end, and in all humility he states that the interpretation is not clear but the takeaway lesson is very valuable:
      * Daniel's prophecy teaches us how to fulfill God's plans.
      * First, we recognize that we are anointed to fulfill God's purpose, and we live with that purpose in mind.
      * We further recognize that accomplishing this purpose will be difficult and even dangerous, so we must have courage and faith.
      * Finally, we keep ourselves aligned with this purpose by understanding what God wants: he wants to end sin, and to meet with his people in a holy place.
      * If we keep these things from Daniel's prophecy in mind, then God can anoint us to fulfill his purpose in our lives.
      Now, you may have a different perspective or understanding, but I can find no fault in what is being expressed in this teaching. This ministry does not profess to know everything, but they are blessing many in their faithful endeavors to bring the Word of God to the people as it is revealed to them. I can't claim to do that. Can you? I could not imagine standing in front of a large group of people and giving an inspired teaching, only to have many from the crowd whip out their [keyboard] clubs and beat me with them.
      *“A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. 35 By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.”* John 13 v 34-35
      I pray constantly for God to reveal truths to me, and sometimes what I consider to be a truth ultimately is disproven because I continue to seek truth. After it is revealed that what I've faithfully embraced as truth is wrong, I weigh what I learned and have the courage to change. This is my walk and only mine; I am abundantly blessed by the humbling lessons given to me.
      I _do_ agree with the Yahshua point but again, being divisive isn't showing love, especially about his name.
      Ironically, you wrote: "Also, and I am not sure how much more of this particular offense I can take from 119"
      Since in Psalms 119 v 165 it says, "Great peace have they which love the law: and *nothing* shall *offend* them.
      Please patient with one another. Shalom.

    • @RL.777
      @RL.777 3 місяці тому +1

      @@April4YHWH
      Verses Matt 22 Mirrors Deut 6:4-5 & Leviticus 19:18
      The Greatest Mitzvot
      Matt 22:34 But the Pharisees, when they heard that Yeshua
      had silenced the Sadducees, gathered together in one
      place. 35 And testing Him, one of them, a lawyer,
      asked, 36 “Teacher, which is the greatest
      commandment in the Torah?”
      37 And He said to him, “‘You shall love ADONAI
      your God with all your heart, and with all your soul,
      and with all your mind.’[133] 38 This is the first and
      greatest commandment. 39 And the second is like it,
      ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’[134] 40 The
      entire Torah and the
      DEUT 6:4 “Hear O Israel, the LORD our God, the LORD is
      one. 5 Love ADONAI your God with all your heart
      and with all your soul and with all your strength
      LEVITICUS 19:18 You are not to take vengeance, nor bear any grudge against the children
      of your people, but love your neighbor as yourself.
      I am ADONAI