The Anatomy of a Feynman Diagram | on the Gaomon PD2200

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 чер 2024
  • You've probably heard of /seen Feynman Diagrams before, but what exactly do they stand for and what make them up? In this videos I try to answer that question. Take advantage of the Gaomon sales through November 29th!
    GAOMON Black Friday Week SALE
    PD2200 - 21.5'' 373.99USD Black Friday Deal--15% OFF
    US: bit.ly/US_PD2200
    November 23 to 29
    PD1560 - 15.6'' 237.99USD Black Friday Deal--34% OFF
    US: bit.ly/GAOMONUS_PD1560
    November 23 to 29
    PD1161 - 11.6'' ON SALE 169.99 Black Friday Deal--29% OFF
    US: bit.ly/GAOMONUS_PD1161
    November 23 to 29
    PD1561 -15.6'' 339.99USD ON SALE
    US: bit.ly/GAOMONUS_PD1561
    PD156PRO -15.6'' ON SALE
    www.amazon.com/dp/B08FXD2V9F
    www.amazon.com/dp/B07ZZ4J7QR
    GAOMON Non-Screen Pen Tablets
    S620: bit.ly/GAOMONUS_S620 33.99USD
    M106K: bit.ly/GAOMONUS_M106K 47.99USD 20% OFF
    www.newegg.com/GAOMON
    Flammable Maths review of the PD 2200 (Starts at 23:05):
    • Separating the Time De...
    A dedicated pd2200 review:
    • A LARGE ONE (Gaomon PD...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 175

  • @tomkerruish2982
    @tomkerruish2982 3 роки тому +70

    0:06 I don't think the penguin diagram is labeled correctly.

    • @AndrewDotsonvideos
      @AndrewDotsonvideos  3 роки тому +13

      Yup, you’re right. When I googled “penguin diagram” to rip a picture for the video, I chose the first one I saw and didn’t even bother to check it. Thanks for pointing that out.

    • @AndrewDotsonvideos
      @AndrewDotsonvideos  3 роки тому +18

      One of the anti-tops should be a top

    • @tomkerruish2982
      @tomkerruish2982 3 роки тому +18

      @@AndrewDotsonvideos Maybe it's a top that identifies as an antitop?

    • @robinwarren6924
      @robinwarren6924 3 роки тому

      🤙🏿

    • @randolphsushi1
      @randolphsushi1 2 роки тому +1

      Don’t worry for every QPT (quantum penguin theory) there is a flipper symmetry so it works out.

  • @maureendotson4634
    @maureendotson4634 3 роки тому +137

    2nd. Sooooo close! Is it just me - or did one of the diagrams on the white board look like a dog? Happy Thanksgiving Kelly & to the best son ever!! ~ Love, Mom 💕

    • @kshitijsalunke2620
      @kshitijsalunke2620 3 роки тому +6

      Maybe someone loves him more than you 😏🤐
      lol just kidding
      hope u come first soon

    • @meowwwww6350
      @meowwwww6350 3 роки тому +5

      You are such a loving mom congrats Dotson

    • @maureendotson4634
      @maureendotson4634 3 роки тому +7

      @@meowwwww6350 - Happy Thanksgiving!! ~ Andrew’s Mom 💕

    • @SK-qc2hb
      @SK-qc2hb 3 роки тому +5

      @@maureendotson4634 Happy Thanksgiving ma'am!!

    • @maureendotson4634
      @maureendotson4634 3 роки тому +3

      @@SK-qc2hb - Happy Thanksgiving. Stay safe! ~ Andrew’s Mom 💕

  • @scretching08
    @scretching08 Місяць тому +1

    Peskin and Schroder is an advanced undergraduate to graduate level and beyond textbook. As a student of applied mathematics, I find it extremely helpful. But for beginners, novices, and undergraduates. McMahon's QFT Demystified, Zee's QFT in a nutshell, and Schwichtenberg's QFT are good places to start. I discovered several new equations combining QFT and molecular biology in 2003 and am finally publishing my discoveries. Pray for me and keep on learning.

  • @shayangfkk7948
    @shayangfkk7948 3 роки тому +16

    After a hard day of GR i'm taking , what makes the day better is
    1 Andrew's math derivations
    2 Alex Flournoy mathematical methods
    thanks , you are the hbar .🖐

  • @TheMrjulitos
    @TheMrjulitos 3 роки тому +61

    Me: Has to study fluid mechanics.
    Also me : Better watch a 30 min vid on Feynman Diagrams

  • @PapaFlammy69
    @PapaFlammy69 3 роки тому +107

    Last time I checked your anatomy, I noticed you were underweight. Gotta give you one more Happy Meal from time to time.

    • @gr00veh0lmes
      @gr00veh0lmes 3 роки тому +4

      He’s not underweight, he just trimmed his beard

    • @AndrewDotsonvideos
      @AndrewDotsonvideos  3 роки тому +25

      I never truly recovered from Andrew my fat (dot)son

    • @gr00veh0lmes
      @gr00veh0lmes 3 роки тому +4

      @@AndrewDotsonvideos Puppy fat from mums cooking melts away when your diet consists of ramen and a side order of low level panic.
      Ah, how I miss my 20’s. 😂

    • @atheoristspointofview7059
      @atheoristspointofview7059 3 роки тому +1

      @@gr00veh0lmes haha my ramen days started recently 😂

    • @dent20111
      @dent20111 3 роки тому

      @@gr00veh0lmes haha..dental school had lots of panic..oooo the memories.

  • @NikolajKuntner
    @NikolajKuntner 3 роки тому +23

    Thanks, Andrew, for taking things into a slightly more advanced direction with your content.

  • @Eigenbros
    @Eigenbros 3 роки тому +25

    Ah, this came just in time. Now I can finally compute the momentum of this relativistic turkey field 🦃. Thanks, Dotson 👌

    • @AndrewDotsonvideos
      @AndrewDotsonvideos  3 роки тому +14

      turkeys minimally couple to stuffing and never forget that

    • @robertsteinbeiss8478
      @robertsteinbeiss8478 3 роки тому

      but self-energy is not the same as the energy you add to yourself

  • @jimpollard9392
    @jimpollard9392 3 роки тому +1

    I know I'm coming late to this, but I have to comment. I've never had math or physics beyond B.Sc (Comp Sci) level. I've seen Feynman Diagrams for years in popular media (Scientific American, etc.) and had a vague general understanding that they aided calculation of probabilities, but I'd never seen an explanation of the mechanics of how it's actually done. So this was extremely interesting. Thank you, Andrew, good look with the dissertation.

  • @GenFightClub
    @GenFightClub 3 роки тому +2

    Breakdown of Audience
    2% people who actually know physics
    10% Tensor Ninjas honing their skills
    69% people who just kept on watching the channel after seeing meme reviews
    19% Andrew’s grandma rewatching videos

  • @riddhiyadav2532
    @riddhiyadav2532 3 роки тому +6

    Tensor boi back at it againn
    Am so happy I found this channel 😌 you literally magically post everything that I need😇😇

  • @RC32Smiths01
    @RC32Smiths01 3 роки тому +19

    I'm a simple man, I see Feynman, I click.

    • @randomblueguy
      @randomblueguy 3 роки тому

      I am fond of you simply man grammar.

    • @RC32Smiths01
      @RC32Smiths01 3 роки тому

      @@randomblueguy Thank you kind man

  • @dozzco2827
    @dozzco2827 3 роки тому +2

    This was an incredibly cool video! Feynman diagrams are absolutely awesome and Renormalization, while epic, is difficult as hell! Thanks for this video! 👍

  • @stefanvietz6665
    @stefanvietz6665 3 роки тому +8

    All I see is a fine man drawing Feynmans

  • @sushruttadwalkar7701
    @sushruttadwalkar7701 3 роки тому

    This is like the best physics video on UA-cam; keep up the great work!

  • @scinc3579
    @scinc3579 3 роки тому +2

    Man, you inspire me so much to start studying physics! I’ve always loved maths and understanding how our universe works but, despite all that, I graduated in mechanical engineering instead (poor choice 😫). However, there are no schools near where I live and, even if there were, I wouldn’t be able to afford it.
    Hope to, someday, enroll in physics when I move out and maybe have the same level of understanding that you have in physics...someday😢.
    Thank you so much for these videos and feeding my dream/passion!

  • @fermiLiquidDrinker
    @fermiLiquidDrinker 3 роки тому

    If anyone's into condensed matter, then Mattuck's _Guide to Feynman Diagrams in the Many-Body Problem_ is a really good read. It's definitely one of the best introductions to Feynman diagrams out there in my humble opinion.

  • @spaceboi135
    @spaceboi135 3 роки тому

    Holy cow not two days ago I just starting studying Feynman diagrams on my own, what amazing timing

  • @joaopedrogoncalves6505
    @joaopedrogoncalves6505 3 роки тому +1

    You are my idol next to Feynman for making these videos! I have read and understood P&S back to front, but your videos are still entertaining

  • @elif9422
    @elif9422 3 роки тому +1

    Hey, great job explaining this idea! I understood a lot more of the video than I usually do

  • @yourdisappointedmother9449
    @yourdisappointedmother9449 3 роки тому +1

    my boi covering the feynman diagrams, thx so much

  • @thereccher8746
    @thereccher8746 3 роки тому

    I took this course last year but dropped out once the pandemic happened. It's a course simply dedicated to learning Feynman diagrams for nuclear reactions. I'm thinking of taking it again before going into my Masters because it seems like a useful skill for a Physicist to have. Problem is the fact that ten different people will learn ten different rules and notations.

  • @RV3G4
    @RV3G4 3 роки тому +22

    I’m just trying to pass calc 1 man...

    • @gangstagoose7207
      @gangstagoose7207 3 роки тому +12

      DONT FORGET + C!!!!

    • @gangstagoose7207
      @gangstagoose7207 3 роки тому +1

      if you don’t get that now, you’ll get that once you get into integration

    • @RV3G4
      @RV3G4 3 роки тому

      My course is slightly accelerated, but I haven’t forgotten it yet! The one thing I made sure I didn’t lose points on during our third exam 😂

  • @adriandynamixab1392
    @adriandynamixab1392 3 роки тому

    If you are using an external mic you can use an audio plugin to cut the computer fan noise when you aren’t talking. I use fab filter pro g which is a gate plugin but there’s a lot more plugins in the market for the same use! So In your case, every time you stop taking the plugin Will turn on and in sense compress the audio signal to zero and then turn off when you start talking again!!

  • @LavenderTown40
    @LavenderTown40 3 роки тому +1

    Best way to kick off thanksgiving! Have a good one (:

  • @meowwwww6350
    @meowwwww6350 3 роки тому +2

    Andrew please upload more videos on qft and strat a new series qft explained for beginners in which you go from basics to calculating feynman diagrams please

  • @gappythegoat5397
    @gappythegoat5397 3 роки тому

    I am an 11 year old kid watching this, and literally my brain melts

  • @aniketeuler6443
    @aniketeuler6443 3 роки тому +2

    That's truly amazing Andrew 😰

  • @niccolozanotti
    @niccolozanotti 3 роки тому

    Really good content as always !

  • @dinos372
    @dinos372 3 роки тому +1

    Feynman diagrams are so beautiful!!

  • @datsmydab-minecraft-and-mo5666

    Awesome Explanation!

  • @anna.n8142
    @anna.n8142 3 роки тому

    Can you please please please please do a video on Algebra 2 , I'm in high school and I absolutely love watching your videos ,

  • @ayushisharma162
    @ayushisharma162 3 роки тому

    You know I quit being a medical student coz I was required to pass a physics exam. And yet am subscribed. I like that words are being said and I don't understand shit. As a literature student it's an insane pleasure. It's just like sitting in my philosophy lectures. Just amazing.

  • @abhishekkp7121
    @abhishekkp7121 3 роки тому +33

    How the hell are you getting out of papa flammy' s basement.

    • @AndrewDotsonvideos
      @AndrewDotsonvideos  3 роки тому +13

      I stole his tablet and ran back to the basement to make a video

    • @abhishekkp7121
      @abhishekkp7121 3 роки тому +1

      @@AndrewDotsonvideos 😂

    • @PapaFlammy69
      @PapaFlammy69 3 роки тому +15

      @@AndrewDotsonvideos Give it back you god damn snitch

  • @zacharyjasper6367
    @zacharyjasper6367 3 роки тому +1

    Great video! Thank you!

  • @ThRandomBomb
    @ThRandomBomb 3 роки тому +1

    A great Thanksgiving giving gift even if I’m not 100% sure what Andrew’s talking about :)

  • @pugazharasuad
    @pugazharasuad 3 роки тому +1

    About time!

  • @lonebazif1982
    @lonebazif1982 3 роки тому +1

    Awesome n much fun to watch

  • @muhammadhamza4494
    @muhammadhamza4494 3 роки тому +1

    I am only an Alevel Student but I enjoyed what ever it was 😄😄

  • @canyadigit6274
    @canyadigit6274 3 роки тому +1

    Happy thanksgiving!

  • @twistedsector
    @twistedsector 3 роки тому +53

    Why do you only have 177K subs, just Lorentz boost to 1.7M lol

  • @baticadavinci3984
    @baticadavinci3984 3 роки тому +2

    more videos please!

  • @pugazharasuad
    @pugazharasuad 3 роки тому +1

    I have to say, the section switching flashbanged my eyes

  • @nickvermaelen1124
    @nickvermaelen1124 3 роки тому +2

    I am a feyn man, I see Feynman, I click

  • @Salmanul_
    @Salmanul_ 3 роки тому

    I like the editing

  • @pedroastorga8140
    @pedroastorga8140 3 роки тому

    Im not even a even a physics major, im a bio major. I don’t know why ive binged like half of your videos lol

  • @YoUwIsHuDiDDaT
    @YoUwIsHuDiDDaT 3 роки тому +1

    This stuff is pretty beyond me but I just wanted to compliment you on your hand writing.

  • @sidneijunior153
    @sidneijunior153 3 роки тому +7

    I just said that I needed a miracle 😳

  • @ChrisChoi123
    @ChrisChoi123 3 роки тому +2

    woah, i just noticed you write lowercase "a"'s in the cool way (like me). when did u start doing that?

  • @ian731
    @ian731 3 роки тому

    I wish you'd take a qft course

  • @sagnikbhattacharjee3311
    @sagnikbhattacharjee3311 3 роки тому

    Where can I get a complete lecture series on QFT that's pretty easy to understand I have read say -Sakurai?

  • @berketozlu
    @berketozlu 3 роки тому

    This video thaught more than my first 2 years of physics education

  • @Safwan.Hossain
    @Safwan.Hossain 3 роки тому

    13:02 "he sure does" lol you just couldn't help it, could you 😂

  • @gurleensingh1895
    @gurleensingh1895 3 роки тому

    Hey man make a video on how can we go from Bsc physics to Phd.Please

  • @fishbones92
    @fishbones92 Рік тому

    Is it okay to prove the vertex interaction from the extra term in the minimally substituted QED Lagrangian?
    Where psi bar is the final state and psi A is the initial state for a fermion whose path is changed by coupling with a photon?
    Ie is this extra term the amplitude for this interaction?

  • @drover7476
    @drover7476 3 роки тому

    27 minutes YES PLEASE, how come youre not on twitter Andrew?

    • @AndrewDotsonvideos
      @AndrewDotsonvideos  3 роки тому +1

      Not big on social media

    • @drover7476
      @drover7476 3 роки тому

      Fair enough man I agree. I dont have Facebook, Instagram or snapchat either but twitter is brilliant

  • @stephendaedalus7841
    @stephendaedalus7841 3 роки тому

    Not sure yet if I like being taught more by right-chiral dotson or left-chiral dotson...

  • @gabzinemo3894
    @gabzinemo3894 3 роки тому

    I was wondering if there was any notable physics books anyone would recommend. I've been interested in studying physics, but I lack a sizeable wallet to study it within college.
    Thanks in advance!
    Gabzi

  • @tp_2301
    @tp_2301 3 роки тому

    Sorry, once I didnt understand... What ec
    excactly was calculated with the Feynman-Rules? Self energie?

  • @skylar141
    @skylar141 3 роки тому

    Hey Andrew. I am about to start at a university in the Spring to major in physics, but I am really nervous about student loan debt. What is your opinion on how much student debt you should be in for a physics major?

  • @themightyai3495
    @themightyai3495 3 роки тому

    Get a load of THIS guy

  • @EssentialsOfMath
    @EssentialsOfMath 3 роки тому +1

    I think I remember you recommending "QFT and the standard model" as a good book for self study in QFT... Is this still your top recommendation, or do you have something else?

  • @alexbyard9358
    @alexbyard9358 3 роки тому +2

    Do you have any references (maybe pdf links?) that illustrate calculations in more complicated QFTs?

  • @jasonliu1181
    @jasonliu1181 3 роки тому +2

    im only here for andrew's handwriting

  • @ephraimdikel7663
    @ephraimdikel7663 3 роки тому

    Hey im 14 years old and I go to College high school and a advanced math program and I wanted to know your opinion of how to manage study time in these kind of situations by the way I really like your content on UA-cam even if I cant understand the more advanced stuff

  • @CJ-sq8wo
    @CJ-sq8wo 3 роки тому +3

    You are 🔥

  • @cristianfreddie
    @cristianfreddie 3 роки тому +1

    I enjoy watching your videos but so far this is above my "smart" level .

  • @otakudnp3880
    @otakudnp3880 3 роки тому +7

    Another video of
    "I don't understand what the hell is going on" 😂

  • @christopherthomas4005
    @christopherthomas4005 3 роки тому

    I am a Great fan, and wanted to ask a little favour. I am 3rd year B.Sc physics student and want to do a project in theoretical physics. can you suggest something?

  • @leonardoesparza2605
    @leonardoesparza2605 3 роки тому

    I thought the exponent on scalar theory (Φ³ , Φ⁴ …) meant the number of incoming and outgoing legs, i.e., Φ⁴ has 2 particles incoming and 2 outgoing, and Φ² just 1 particle incoming and 1 outgoing.

    • @leonardoesparza2605
      @leonardoesparza2605 3 роки тому

      Oh no, I’m sorry, it’s the Green function of n points the one that dictates how many external legs your diagram will have: Φ⁴ using a Green function of 4 points means 4 external legs, right?.
      Also there is a constant next to the Φ (it is often λ or g, i.e. λ Φ⁴/4!) and I understand the number of vertex your diagram will have depends on the order of that exponen you work with (λ² means you’ll have 2 vertex).

  • @sakshamsharma4184
    @sakshamsharma4184 3 роки тому +3

    Loads of love from india to andrew
    Love you andrew
    Just one question......
    Can a moving charge can have both electric and magnetic feilds??

    • @riccardoorlando2262
      @riccardoorlando2262 3 роки тому +1

      Yes.
      An electric charge is accompanied by an electric field, by definition. If that charge is also accelerating, there will also be a magnetic field.

    • @tomkerruish2982
      @tomkerruish2982 3 роки тому

      @@riccardoorlando2262 It doesn't need to be accelerating, just moving. Magnetism is a relativistic correction to electricity. That is why magnetic fields are only generated by moving charges and only affect moving charges (classically speaking; charged particles with spin is a different can of worms).

    • @riccardoorlando2262
      @riccardoorlando2262 3 роки тому

      @@tomkerruish2982 Sigh.
      *Picks up E&M*
      Ah shit, here we go again.

    • @tomkerruish2982
      @tomkerruish2982 3 роки тому

      @@riccardoorlando2262 Well, that's how I learned it in college. First, they taught us special relativity, which we then used to derive Maxwell's Equations. (Okay, we started with Gauss's Law and maybe some other stuff; it's been nearly 35 years.)

  • @leot7
    @leot7 3 роки тому +2

    Will you ever return to videos at whiteboard or will it be the tablet forever?

    • @AndrewDotsonvideos
      @AndrewDotsonvideos  3 роки тому +1

      Do you prefer the whiteboard?

    • @leot7
      @leot7 3 роки тому +1

      Tbh, yeah, but I do get the advantages of tablet and realize I’m probably in the minority. But I feel like the whiteboard is more engaging and easier to follow, rather than just seeing writing appear on the screen with your icon in the top corner. Ya know?

  • @nicolascortes9109
    @nicolascortes9109 3 роки тому

    Andrew how long in total (from undergrad school to grad school) did it take you to earn your PhD?



    If you answer this, thank you a lot I really appreciate it.

  • @NovaWarrior77
    @NovaWarrior77 3 роки тому +2

    He always says "what's goin' on smart people", but no one ever says it back : (

  • @mohammadtarshihi364
    @mohammadtarshihi364 3 роки тому +2

    Hey Andrew, have you ever considered setting up a discord server? I'm sure a lot of people would join instantly and there you could set up some moderators. Of course, I'm not saying you should. You're a busy man, but if you have considered it or at least want to in the future, please reply here so I can know

    • @AndrewDotsonvideos
      @AndrewDotsonvideos  3 роки тому +1

      I want to but I really just having taken the time to learn how it works

  • @tomkerruish2982
    @tomkerruish2982 3 роки тому

    I've never taken a course in QFT, but I've leafed through some texts on it, which is pretty much equivalent, right?
    At any rate, it's incredible how broken this is and yet still works. First, as you pointed out, your calculation has a logarithmic divergence, which needs to be covered up somehow. Second, correct if I'm wrong, but those i epsilon terms are there to move the poles off the real axis with no justification other than it makes the calculation possible. Third, these diagrams describe terms in a perturbation series which, like essentially all perturbation series, diverges if you take enough terms.
    To recap, there are three (to my mind) solid reasons not to trust this... and yet it works. No wonder Feynman said to not bother trying to figure out what quantum mechanics really means.

    • @twistedsector
      @twistedsector 3 роки тому +1

      It's not that broken:
      1. The bare parameters of the free Lagrangian are themselves nonsensical in an interacting theory, so these unrenormalised parameters lead to divergences
      2. This can be defined reasonably rigorously by switching to Euclidean time and adding a vanishing temperature (moving the time contour rather than the poles)
      3. At least for QED, the series is roughly asymptotic in that higher order terms decrease in magnitude, so it makes predictions that seem to be very accurate for now
      Although I'd agree, QFT does not have a formulation that I'd both mathematically rigorous and useful qualitatively

    • @tomkerruish2982
      @tomkerruish2982 3 роки тому

      @@twistedsector About your third point, yes, the magnitude of each term decreases, but (I believe) the number of diagrams becomes so numerous that it more that counteracts this, though this might not be until 137th order.

  • @xxxJoakoDarKxxx
    @xxxJoakoDarKxxx 3 роки тому

    bro i wanna be like U when I grow up

  • @ffusk
    @ffusk 2 роки тому

    God-like

  • @atheoristspointofview7059
    @atheoristspointofview7059 3 роки тому +1

    The one dislike is Andrew himself

  • @lattice737
    @lattice737 3 роки тому

    Introducing: The Dotson Lectures

  • @shantanudash7
    @shantanudash7 3 роки тому +6

    How u doing Andrew?

  • @IsaAbdulHakeem
    @IsaAbdulHakeem 3 роки тому

    I didn't know Ben Affleck was doing a Physics PhD

  • @miguelaphan58
    @miguelaphan58 3 роки тому +1

    ¿ could you teach those feynman diagrams in andrew style?....would be fantastic !!!!

    • @AndrewDotsonvideos
      @AndrewDotsonvideos  3 роки тому

      Which diagrams?

    • @miguelaphan58
      @miguelaphan58 3 роки тому

      @@AndrewDotsonvideos basic ones, scatering of electrons, electromagnetic interactions,....with special enphasis on symmetry factor...there is no " pedagogical material ",,,about this point, and articles in pdf, are from experts ...for expersts in the matter...physics fans ...keep out

  • @farhannoor3935
    @farhannoor3935 3 роки тому +2

    Le me: hasnt even done University Physics modern physics section

  • @wiserhuman21
    @wiserhuman21 3 роки тому

    Andrew, how are you, man?

  • @brandonfoy9207
    @brandonfoy9207 3 роки тому

    Today I saw someone putting together some sort of circuit and I instinctively said "Found the experimentalist"..... I'm not even a physics student..... will I ever recover?!!?!

  • @matthewmartin7639
    @matthewmartin7639 3 роки тому

    "this is aimed more for those who aren't far along enough in their studies..."
    I got a C in Algebra Based physics 1. The third time I took it. I think I'll be just fine *finger pistols*

  • @BaronVonTacocat
    @BaronVonTacocat 3 роки тому +2

    _Feynman Rules!_
    _rename K, E K_

  • @viniciusf.linhares1416
    @viniciusf.linhares1416 3 роки тому +2

    My bosons are never this wavy :/ they're more like a saw, won't even talk about the gluons

  • @harunbasmac7679
    @harunbasmac7679 3 роки тому

    No one:
    Andrew Dotson: ı

  • @IsaAbdulHakeem
    @IsaAbdulHakeem 3 роки тому

    Hi Ben Affleck

  • @DumblyDorr
    @DumblyDorr 3 роки тому

    Says he is very careful about how he states things ... consistently calls a diagram a process 😁
    Classic physicist style - just like in group theory, physicists don't know the difference between a thing and its representations 😂
    (💖 with brotherly love - Math-Gang)

  • @morgengabe1
    @morgengabe1 3 роки тому

    “I don’t do product reviews on this channel...”

    • @AndrewDotsonvideos
      @AndrewDotsonvideos  3 роки тому

      I don't really understand the point of this comment. I took 3 minutes out of a 27 minute video. This isn't a video only talking about the tablet, in fact most of it doesn't even mention it.

    • @morgengabe1
      @morgengabe1 3 роки тому

      ​@@AndrewDotsonvideos It's not a big deal. Honestly, I expect that more than a couple of viewers of this channel are going to be teaching some day, so a review of a potentially good utensil or manufacturer isn't even that far out of order, imo. But I'm sure they asked you to do/say some particularly cringey things and/or you would've liked more time to get to know it, so fair play.
      If you **do** decide to do one, make sure you give us a reasonable idea of its limitations and how it stacks up against similar products and it should be fine and dandy.
      cheers
      TMI part:
      I didn't know about how little time you'd spent talking about it because I'm still looking forward to watching this later in the week. But the title mentioned it (and I don't really understand the point of it doing so :p), and you were already pretty nice about it after the video on deriving Noether's Theorem, for someone who "doesn't do reviews".

  • @juijani4445
    @juijani4445 3 роки тому

    Me: Hey, hey, my brain....can I focus right now, please? I still have a lot of chem stuff to do today.
    My brain: Oh, here's da thing....NO! u can't do dat! bt wut u can do s u can watch dis vid dats 27 mins long n den too u 'ave some time left for prepping for the haloalkanes & haloarenes test.
    Me: Well, I also have 2 pending genetics classes that I missed & then another E&....
    My brain: Shut the f up!
    Me: What am I thinking? I got like, what 15 hours to finish all that? 27 minutes are like 3% of 15 hours? We can still approximate that to 1st order and then that's just 1%? That's nothing! Yeah, 15 hours are more than enough. Who needs a week of preparation? Thanks brain.

  • @Supercatzs
    @Supercatzs 3 роки тому

    Get a load of THIS guy