Steven Crowder Goes To WAR With Jared
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 кві 2024
- MindsFest Tickets: tickets.vulcanpresents.com/e/... Promo code AJW for 20% Off
In this video I discuss the video Jared formerly from Louder With Crowder dropped accusing Steven Crowder of using law fare against him to hurt his career. I explain what I'm interested in & the response from LWC CEO Gerald
Website: www.actualjusticewarrior.com/
linktr.ee/ActualJustice
Odysee: odysee.com/@actualjusticewarr...
Rumble: rumble.com/ActualJusticeWarrior
Instagram NEW: / actualjustice
Twitch: / actualjusticewarrior
Utreon: utreon.com/c/ActualJusticeWar...
2nd Channel: / ajw2dreamscometrue
TeeSpring Store: teespring.com/stores/actualju...
New Store: actualjusticewarrior.myspread...
Gettr: gettr.com/user/iamsean90
Parler: parler.com/profile/Actualjust...
www.minds.com/actualjusticewa...
Support me on Patreon: / seanfitzgerald
Paypal: www.paypal.me/Iamsean90
Venmo: venmo.com/iamsean90
Support me on Subscribe Star: www.subscribestar.com/seanfit...
Gab: gab.com/Iamsean90
Twitter / iamsean90
Backup Twitter / ajwsean
Bitchute: www.bitchute.com/actualjustic...
Discord: / discord
3rd: / dudemonkeyhq
Get Storable Food: www.preparewithajw.com
Get Pocketnet: pocketnet.app/actualjusticewa...
Podcast Links:
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/1o0q86A...
Apple: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Google Podcast: podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0...
Sources:
Jared's Initial Video: / 1772594355620270141
Jared's Fundraiser: www.gofundme.com/f/monroe-fam...
LWC Response: • Here’s what you don’t ...
LWC Documents Response Thread: / 1773005805354156474
Lauren Southern's Video: • Debunking Steven Crowd...
Article Crowder Custody: www.currentrevolt.com/p/steve...
Current Revolt Twitter: / currentrevolt
DailyMail Crowder Custody Article No Paywall: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...
Steven Crowder StopBigCon: • It's time to stop...
DW Response To Crowder: • Our Offer to Steven Cr...
TimCast Episode Referenced: ua-cam.com/users/liveIyJBb_dd...
Hilary's Lawyer Reps Tucker Carlson: www.forbes.com/sites/nicholas...
WebMd Dogo Argentino: www.webmd.com/pets/dogs/what-...
Ring Timing Complaints: community.ring.com/t/recordin...
Destiny Explains Ring Video: • Why The Leaked Steven ...
Article About Ring Video: nypost.com/2023/04/28/steven-...
#StevenCrowder #Lawsuit #IamSean90
FAIR USE NOTICE
This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright. - Комедії
![ОРБАН приехал к ПУТИНУ и "отчитался" о поездке в Киев 😁 [Пародия]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_0ukDovOWq8/mqdefault.jpg)
You can agree with Crowders politics but also believe hes a complete narcissist.
People throw that word around so much, its becoming meaningless
What does him being a narcissist have to do with Jared and his ex wife trying to fleece him for more money, take his kids from him, and damage his business?
I don't even know, or care, what his politics are these days.
Exactly, that's how I feel about Trump.
He’s a giant grift
Give me the money! Give you?!? Give me the money!
It’s funny every time
I catch myself repeating it every time. Her delivery is perfect
Okay
@@manuelperez9764I catch myself coming up with ways to work it in to conversations with my wife, who also does it back
"Give me the coffee. Give YOU? Give ME the coffee.. OK.."
OKAY!!!
I'm sick of hearing "I didn't want to do this" or "This didn't have to happen."
That's the language of a manipulator seeking power and dominance over someone.
Exactly. "I didn't want to do this..." was the title for the video of him playing the secretly recorded phone conversation with Jeremy Boering. And Steven had a dumb smile on his face as he kept replaying the supposed "gotcha" moment. I think secretly recording that conversation was already awful, but don't tell me you "didn't want to do this" or "this brings me no pleasure" when you're laughing and obviously enjoying it.
I'm sure you didn't want to say that. It didn't have to happen.
The only time someone says this is when they are loading a firearm.
For once it would be nice to see a video with the title “I want the smoke” 😂
I love when Internet personalities start a video/post/tweet with “I didn’t want to do this” or “I wasn’t gonna do this”.
Didn’t stop ya, did it?
Idk I could see Steven being a dick to work with..
True. But people like that tend to attract similar personalities when they start a company. So yeah Crowder is probably a dick but so is evryone else involved most likely.
Being a dick boss isn’t illegal though…
I don’t doubt that. I’ve worked for a few. I didn’t insert myself into their private life and divorce. Collude with their ex’s lawyer in an attempt to extort them never crossed my mind.
I wouldn't be surprised. However that is not grounds for breaking an NDA or non-disparagement clause in a contract.
Same can be said about most bosses running multi-million dollar companies.
I think we can all agree the only people winning in this debacle are the lawyers.
Nobody's mentioning that Crowders audience is naturally hard wired to hate anyone named Hillary.
Yeah but these Hillarys seem to have something in common..
They love to delete evidence
I'm with her
@@thedavischanger#MeToo
Well, to be fair, the Hillary we're all thinking about since you brought it up is not a good human being in general. I can't speak for Crowder's Hillary, though. And I'm not going to pick sides until we have _all_ the facts, not just one side only.
Well his wife's name is Hilary and not Hillary, so I understand the confusion though.
Pearl is a pale snake in the grass.
She is awful
Any parent who demands full custody without evidence of abuse is a monster. They want to hurt their ex more than they want to love their children.
That alone makes me despise her. I don’t give a fuck if she has no friends she has no right to steal someone’s children. She doesn’t get to be free
🙌🏼amen. You wanted to hang out with me. But now that you don’t, I’m dangerous to be around. 🙄 sure Jan
@@LyndseeMSteven wants full custody. Hilary asked for split custody
Steven wants full custody. Hilary asked for split custody
@@LyndseeMdo you don’t think that men can become abusive later in the relationship?
I got a few minutes into this before realizing I didn't give one single damn about any part of this story lol
Wow you're super cool
@@gregutz4284 I know, thanks.
Haha me too. I was like, wait a minute... Why am I watching this?
@@cmonman3639 Good job. Seriously. 😂
Based
Ben Shapiro, candance Owen, daily wire, crowder.... a bunch of wealthy people that have become out of touch with reality in my humble opinion
wealth has nothing to do with it, I see plenty of poor losers who have no grasp on reality either, you just have a problem with their own personal views their large viewer base tells you a crap ton of people agree with their views. (I don't watch any of them)
Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right...
@@RetroPages here I am stuck in the middle with you
Saus Ben "who needs to retire" Shapiro
That could be true and Crowder could still be a lying asshole. They don't have to be mutually exclusive.
Daily Wire must be thinking "We sure dodged a bullet!" now.
Just shows you the love of money juice have to even consider signing a complete psychopath like Steven.
lol this attack campaign is funded by them
@@derpsnarf4052 I don't think they realized how bad it was when they were considering him.
@@adrianalexanderveidt344 to be fair not many did. Honestly it was his handling of that beef that made a lot of people see. His mask slipped a little and then this has all unraveled since then.
To be fair I lost respect for both parties
Tired of the infighting we have way bigger fish to fry
At this point I’m most open to the possibility that two things can be true at once, they both suck. It is entirely possible that everything Jared is saying is true, but the second he entwined himself in a divorce and conspired to take a father’s kids away from without even suggesting anything like child abuse he lost all my sympathy. So either Jared is a garbage person and Crowder is innocent, or they’re both garbage people.
Jared working to get Crowders kids taken/kept from him is a big no. Even if Steven was a massive POS to him, Jared is the bad guy IMO just for that.
If he had a reason beyond revenge it would void the NDA in how big it is think of every reason that would make that statement remotely justified in your head, yeah none of them would be covered by NDA
@@androidoficeandfire9667 yeah man, Jared said he doesn’t feel comfortable with Crowder being around his own kids, but never even hinted at anything that would justify that statement. If he had some evidence showing Crowder was an abusive father that would be one thing, but he didn’t even suggest that could be the case, so why make that statement? What does it mean?
@@MalefaxTheBlack Why? Steven seems like a POS, so I don't see why I would see him being a good father to his kids. Especially after how he never seemed to really care for them.
@@kristoferprovencal3608Jared made his statement in his feelings over watching that video of Crowder yelling at his wife in the backyard.
He has nothing else.
That’s my prediction of the situation at least.
I can see why they call him not gay, because it isn't obvious.
Gerald strikes me as a creep
As someone who's as neutral in this as anyone could be (I've been on Steven's side, I've been on Jared's sides, and I've been on Steven's wife's side, all at different times as my knowledge of this affair progressed). And what I've ultimately concluded is that there are no "innocent" people here. Each of them has a reason to be upset, but at the same time is also doing some slimy and gross. ALL OF THEM. There are no heroes in this story, in spite of every Conservative commentator picking a side to die on.
I could elaborate on the facts that make me feel this way, and I started too, but realized that comment would end up being exceptionally long, and knew no-one would read it. Just like no-one will probably read this.
i never felt something so deep in my life....
Oh, so you have just realized that pure-as-driven-snow heroes don't exist? Should make the news
This is the case for so many disagreements lol. People suck, and angry people do scummy things.
I actually would read the cliff notes of whats going on because I know very little but am curios if you don’t mind.
@@user-gd3bb2pz7esure they do. You are just too pathetic and morally weak to see them.
1/4 Black Garret was able to keep his name. Others have been able to keep working and have all social media. Either Crowder treated Jared differently or someone is being dishonest.
Ya. Jared teamed up with HC’s campaign to destroy LWC. That seems to be the major difference. He also wants to keep SC’s kids away from him. Why??? The nanny, who spends more time with the kids than the parents, sang nothing but praise for SC.
Jared trying to keep Steven from his kids is all I need to know to determine that Jared is the bigger POS here.
The true is, Jared signed a contract willingly, the non compete ended in 2020 which Jared started a company called Honest Fox never heard of it yeah didn’t take off, Garrett and Landau started their own show no contract signed audio wade made his own podcast crowder might be a pain to work with but Jared went to far
Indeed he's went way too far.
Jared must have some different shit in Crowder. Only thing that makes sense
Crowder's side sounds so whiney. Listen to that warbling voice and vocal fry.
Just read the comments from the Ceowderstans. Most of them didn't even watch the video before defending Crowder
LWC has higher turnaround than McDonald's, there has to be a reason.
He doesn’t , if you idiots are gonna complain about that look at DW you say something bad about Israel they fire you
My thoughts too
I find it so wierd how saying anything with “D VV” gets my comments deleted instantly, Sean is paid by them and you should see there turnover rate it’s exponentially higher and they actually do steal peoples careers
Homophobia?
NDA’s don’t cover illegal behaviour. If he could prove that Crowder was actually abusive he could do it.
Being "hard to work with" is not abuse.
NDAs don’t cover extortion
Yes, but the way he went about it casts a hell of a lot of doubt. If it was actually illegal behavior, or if he thought it was, he would have taken it to the authorities. NOT the "Court of Public Opinion" where he is trying to assassinate Crowder because - based on his actions - he does not actually have evidence of wrong doing.
Abuse is not illegal, at least not in the colloquial sense
@@canisblack wrongdoing and illegal behavior are too different things
1:02:17 I didn’t take it as guilt by association. I took it as saying, this attorney has seemingly practiced law fare in the past that includes smear tactics and false images etc. By saying this I believe he’s implying that it’s very possible (if not likely) that this attorney uses underhanded media tactics to put pressure on the people he’s litigating against. I can attest to this as I have been in a lawsuit against a company Bryan Freedman represented. Freedman is also being sued by Michael Kassan as of 5 days ago.
100 percent Gerald is Crowders personal bottom
Gerald is so disingenuous. He looks like he doesn't even believe what he is saying.
He's a very good spokesman for a company in that regard. I've thought that for quite a while.
Like someone else mentioned earlier, "talks the way a demon would to you.."
The dog comments pushed me way over the edge, the level of disingenuousness is nauseating
I think he just has the tism, he just kinda looks and talks like that.
He's always been like that. When I watched their ages ago I would think the same thing. He speaks well but there is no meaning behind it.
why did he even sign that paper ... Dave Landau said he didn't sign it and he talks about who crowder is and Crowder can't legally do anything
That’s what I’ve wondered I know Jared signed some sort of noncompete when he signed with LWC. Law and Lumber mentioned that apparently Jared negotiated a better noncompete terms in return for the NDA.
He explained it in his original video FFS
Its literally at the start of this video, he had a non compete clause that Crowder's lawyers were willing to loosen in exchange for allowing him to go to another specific Job he had lined up... which once he started working at they sent another Cease and Desist causing him to lose that job.
Well that nda was signed when Steven was different and the show was different, I’m sure many of the things that are being alleged now are true, but I’m also fairly sure they are relatively recent developments. With his wealth and notoriety Steven has become a lot more angry, bitter, mean spirited, and generally someone who seems to have lost his faith in god and Jesus. The daily wire stuff alone should have been enough for most, a normal business discussion leveraged to get people on a mailing list while throwing friends of 10 or 15 years under the bus as traitors and sellouts for what you yourself have done to others. When his fights with his wife leaked that should have sealed it, and yet people with defend the man without ever acknowledging his failures. This video hasn’t even been out long enough for people to judge and yet Stevens fan boys are here dismissing it outright. At least if you are going to act like sheep give us all the courtesy of accepting it, instead of acting like a bunch of libs. Mad that your ideology was attacked and justifying it with limp-wristed defenses of what you would otherwise call reprehensible behavior.
@@sparks6177 The problem is that im not even a fanboy, and I know that you are lying. You know we are on the internet. When you make claims, people can doublecheck you.
I'm gonna take the black pill and say ALL parties are despicable in this situation. Divorces can be really ugly. Inserting yourself inside a person's divorce is probably the most dishonorable thing a man can do.
The *most* dishonorable thing? I think you're skipping over quite a few other actions.
Crowder has ruined him financially for 6 years and is still doing so.
Well no
Steven crowder is the abuser and Hillary is trying to free herself from his clutches
Have you not seen that awful video?
@@whitesoxMLBmaybe he meant literally inserting himself??
I feel bad for him, but he keeps saying that NDA was unconstitutional. That’s not how free speech works and he voluntarily signed that agreement.
Force, fraud, and coercion
@@PunkShockRockand what evidence do we have of that? None. Just the word of a disgruntled former employee
@@TheWhiteTrashPanda given crowder’s history of SA to his workers by his CEO’s admission, I’ll take Jared’s word over Steve
It is unconstitutional though. The government acting as an arbitrator when it comes to restricting speech, makes it so.
Aren't NDAs now illegal for employment separation agreements/severance packages? Not that it would matter with Jared (as he signed his years ago), but good for others to know right now.
Jared may or may not be being treated unfairly, but he didn’t lose constitutional rights when he entered into a contract. He signed it. He wants to get out of it, fine. But he’s whining a bit much.
Facts!
But his entire argument is that the contract that he signed was not fulfilled and that some of the things stipulated in the contract were false. As an example: him thinking he had a carve out to work for another, specific company, but that Crowder allegedly sabotaged it. Whether or not you believe him is up to you, but let’s not make things up about what he has flatly stated.
But why is Jared talking about the divorce in the first place? That literally has nothing to do with him.
Maybe to build a case of character?
Is it possible he is just caring for a friend?
A friend of his is going through a bad divorce. The texts were to her privately. This isn't rocket science
@@joshcooper7No, but it's fucking weird.
@@MeanBeanComedywhy is it weird to talk to a friend about a divorce privately?
As much of a POS Steven is... Jared putting himself in the middle of very public divorce is some the slimmest shit 😒
He and Hilary are friends, no?
He's trying to have the man's children taken away from him. And Sean's endorsing it. Despicable
my dude , Crowders the one telling the world about his divorce.
@@BlyGuy just cause he didn't pull out doesn't mean he's a good father
@@BlyGuyI mean...is that not what both Crowder and his wife are trying to do - take their children away from their other parent? Everyone involved is awful is what I'm getting at.
I had a narc boss and family member. If I heard either/any of them were divorcing, I'd be vocal about my desire for what is best for the children. Even without divorcing I'd say the same things. Narcissists are deadly toxic, they destroy. Jared gets to have his opinions and his friends just like anyone else.
There's just something about that Gerald guy that has always rubbed me the wrong way. Can't quite put my finger on it, but a nasty chill goes down my spine whenever I see his face and hear him talk. Everything in my body is telling me not to trust that guy.
Same for me. And when all this stuff went down regarding daily wire and how Gerald just started being Steven's trained ape and stepping in for him to smooth things over and appear more reasonable but in reality he never answered or addressed anything and instead just deflected. It's so sketchy
@Selfcarestars123 And you're the type who thinks they can judge someone's entire soul by a single UA-cam comment they wrote. A true schizo take.
@@synthesizerneilWhy assume their conclusion is based on one tweet?
@@WhatsTheTakeaway What are you talking about? Tweet? What tweet? Are you okay buddy?
@@synthesizerneilpssst he was talking about Stephen and Gerald not you and the original commenter
A lot of people in these comments are showing that they didn't watch the video.
The video was absolutely terrible, and a one-sided Hilary simp fest.... The guy is heavily biased against Steven.
@@JonHop1you guys are amazing
It's pretty hilarious-- I'm not a fan or a hater of Crowder, but clearly the die hards are pretty obsessed with him.
@iamjurell it's crazy I supported Crowder during the daily wire stuff too, yet have been told I'm biased against Crowder by friends and family just because I can see this situation for what it is. Heck there's even big parallels between this and Crowder vs daily wire, that I honestly believe people are just showing themselves to be hypocrites by being on Crowder's side in both cases.
The crowder simps are wild.
If you donated to jared, at least we know you arent a neutral arbiter in this commentary.
Having come to a conclusion is not delegitimizing.
I’m not even sure I’ll watch the rest. Clearly he bought the lies.
@@JD-xz1mx come to a conclusion? Its an ongoing divorce battle. It aint concluded.
@@JD-xz1mx once the bias is exposed, yes it is.
@Fabric_Hater actually the divorce is over. They finished in mediation
They tried to do the same thing with Dave and say his comedy was Crowders
When Crowder released personal phone conversations about his negotiations with daily wire was the end for me. You only release those conversations if you have zero intentions of actually signing a contract. All it did was prove to me that Crowder negotiated without good faith
Whoa whoa whoa....
You need to get a timeline going.
How old was the ring footage the daily wire released? 4 years old?
Where was it from? His back Patio.
How did they get this footage? Why do they have it?
How is it they had this footage, ready to release, 2 days after he released the phone call?
Why did he lose 2 staffers at the same time?
Crowder was getting hit by seedy business deals, having already lost 2 employees.
He retaliated with releasing a BUSINESS PHONE CALL.
They retaliate by releasing out of context home footage.
I know if you had that happen to you, you'd be seeing red.
You would want someone's head.
Timeliness help one figure out WHAT happened.
Remember: election year.
Crowder is releasing damning evidence against the left.
@enigmalfidelity these people are basically liberals, you can't reason with them, most are Daily Wire watching Ben "JIDF" Shapiro supporting RINO globalists. Just take a look at the terms they use, many of them use the same phrases leftists do, such as calling everyone a "narcissist" or saying that being mean to people is "abusive" or telling people to "do better".
These are leftists in "conservative-face".
I used to watch every day as soon as they went live. I did so for years.
Then, my friend, Dave Landau, began working there. I privately warned Dave about things that I had picked up on (being a body language expert) after having watched many, many, manyyyyyyy hours of Steven over time.
And even though Dave made the show the best it had ever been, he still ended up leaving quite soon. Then, Dave confirmed for me that I had been correct before he eventually went public about all of it.
The day Dave told me what he had experienced was the day I stopped watching permanently, which was a major bummer for me. However, everything that has happened since then has made me feel better about my choice.
And yet here i stand absolutely drowning in razors, chocolate, tumblers, gold, sheets, toothbrushes...
Its almost like its simple a for profit machine trying to sell the same conservative talking points without doing fuck all about it. Oh yeah, and some really shit basketball movie. Glad to see our money burned on a pyre.
You are obviously not being objective here. If you donated money to a GoFundMe on one side or the other of this particular scenario and then want to comment on it in a UA-cam video, then your objectivity is out of the window. You already have major decision on who you think is in the right and who you think is in the wrong. You should take the video down and rethink your point of view and express it differently.
So him thinking the balance of facts weighs heavily in favor of Jared removes his objectivity?
Besides, the money is to help litigate the issue, not to make sure Jared wins. We just want sunlight, which Crowder has been steadfastly avoiding for years now.
@@bvoyelrThe balance of facts are not based on Sean knowing enough about this scenario to come to a conclusion on it. There is obviously a lot more that Sean and the rest of us don't know than we do know. So he's already made a decision about whom he thinks is in the right here without knowing everything about the situation. That is where the duplicity of objectivity that he is trying to demonstrate here is called into question.
AJW is one of my favorite UA-cam channels that I watch and have watched for years and this ^^ is absolutely true. I hate to see it but it's true.
@@Ferrari308-GTSiyou keep saying 'objectivity' as if this video is claimed to be a document of objective fact-- do you suppose *the CEO* of LWC was being whatever is your definition of 'objective' when he made *his* video and *objectively* lied?
Or hey, maybe it's your eyes lying when a court document *objectively* says something different than was claimed by LWC?
@@iamjurell Why would Gerald need to be objective? He is one of the concerned parties in this nonsense. Sean is not a concerned party. He is just a commentator on the outside.
How did we get to a place where anyone with a social media presence can just ask for strangers to financially support their decisions, whether righteous or not? Can you do that?
I got a speeding ticket over the summer. Anyone wanna pay for it for me?
You can certainly try.
Good job, Sean!! As soon as that video leaked, I stopped watching LWC. I just knew something was messed up when Landau, whom I adore, left. Crowder is a bully. Like top notch.
I miss Jared... Steve and Jared were great together.
Yep. Quit watching after he left.
@@aservantinbabylon Same for me.
Same
Same
Same
AJW is adding words and meaning into emails/texts that aren’t there. The ex never said she wanted more time and freedom with or for the kids. She stated she wanted more freedom. You should have given a disclaimer that you hate LWC and this is your biased take. Normally you have solid analysis on crime and related material. This is too much
By any chance, did Sean mention how the nanny testified that she spent the most time with the kids while all Hilary did was watch TV or did he leave that out? I'm not watching this whole hit piece
I'm 4 mins in and when I seen he donated $501 to this con man I knew where he stood. You don't have to like crowder but this weasel fuck got involved in his divorce. I'd beat tf outta him over that. Who can take this guy seriously and ajw is usually solid but come on dude
@@oag2167 no of course he didn't.
@39:40 ""I want more freedom than that", referring to as well custody of the children" - Gerald.
Yeah. I am no fan of Crowder, but this video pretty much made me unsub from AJW. His videos are usually alright. But anyone who "interprets" without evidence to fit in their bias is not someone I am interested in hearing from. This whole video was just... bad.
It's wild; the only place Jared talks about the divorce is in a private text to someone in the divorce. Jared isn't publicly seeking on SC. Why are people commenting like he has?
Because they are idiots, simps for Crowder, or both...
I don’t know if he is directly involved, but apparently crowders wife was basically trying to blackmail him into giving her more money than she was legally entitled to, hence crowder suing her, her family, and her lawyers.
Is it Jared or Jerald??
@@mudslinger8694Jared is the former employee. Gerald is the current CEO of LWC and the one talking in the video.
And do you think about someone "privately" plotting to take your kids away from you?
Not rooting for one side or the other, but I love internet drama so 😂
Just my 2 cents, but this seems like he went out of his way to side with Jared.
I've seen both videos and AJW is heavily curating what the crowder guy is saying. I get it the video is 30 minutes but he either A misrepresents the core points of a clip or he hyper focuses on some miniscule component of the video and makes it more important than it really is.
He also keeps putting all the weight on LWC to show these documents and emails, as if not showing them is evidence that they are in the wrong, yet this goes both ways. Jared should have documents proving LWC is drowning him in legal fees, he should have access to his own emails and yet AJW doesn't say he is a liar or manipulator for not showing proof of his claims. AJW also applies an extremely one sided critical eye, going out of his way to try and dismantle what LWC says but seemingly just taking Jared at face value.
Also let's be straight up he donated to Jared 😂 Seems a bit unethical to me to donate to one side and then produce propaganda supporting them, masquerading it as neutral reporting.
Fully agree with you here I'm quite disappointed in how heavily AJW sided with jarred here
Closest i have ever come to unsubbing to AJW
How is he masquerading as neutral? He said in the opening of the video that he donated to Jared’s legal fees. That’s an outright statement that he thinks one party if more right than the other.
Explain an example of him misrepresenting a clip from Gerald.
Everyone involved sucks. The end.
Sorry not sorry. Jared sucks but the Crowder crew seems to be shady right now as well. I dont trust none em
How so?
couldn't agree more
True. I hope both get sued and both lose somehow.
Look at the language here. The crew "seems" shady, but it's quite convenient how that evidence doesn't exist. Jared and Hillary both actually did something shady, like break NDA's and deleted 2k hours of home surveillance, respectively, but the Crowder crew "seems" shady. One side actually committed shady acts while another only has accusations leveled against them with no evidence.
How’s crowders crew shady for not revealing documents they are under contract to not reveal?
Not your best take by a long shot Sean
I've come to realize the reason Steven Crowder was so mad at the Daily Wire's contract is it was so similar to contracts Louder with Crowder uses.
Edit: Some people have not understood what I'm saying. I am not saying Crowder was mad that Daily Wire stole a copy of his contract to use or he felt they were using a contract to similar to his, what I am saying is that he was mad that the Daily Wire's contract demanded the same kind of control of his social media accounts that Crowder's contract demands of his employees.
Actually he hires nobodies and gives them positions to gain experience and fame and a lot of money.
Crowder is a millionaire and was offered a pittance of what he makes.
@@logangodofcandy don't forget to breathe between slurps
@@logangodofcandy then he needs no NDAs since he is such a kind and compassionate man who dispenses largesse whever he goes.
You tiny hat lovers are insane , DW wanted 99% of LWC that was the problem not the NDA’s but of course just like ajw you troglodytes must lie to have an argument
Projection. It was always projection with SC. Literally no one who worked with him has anything nice to say and talk about how controlling and jealous he is while simultaneously trying to keep them down.
The projection is strong with this Dbag
As someone with a close sister currently going through a divorce with 2 young kids, I know to take isolated text messages with a HEAVY spoonful of salt. In the absolute HELL that is a contentious divorce with children and livelihoods at stake, it is very easy to get carried away fantasizing about absurd theories and tactics to use, to go off on complete tangents about “what if he does this, that, or this etc etc”.
Over the course of years, you will have thousands of conversations which occur, many of them right in the midst of seriously intense and traumatizing situations. In those moments, you will express feelings of pure hatred and plots for revenge which, when shown in an entirely separate context, will make a perfectly reasonable person appear like a deranged psychopath.
When speaking privately to close family deeply involved these disputes, everyone understands the context of the situation and will speak in an unguarded manner, even say things which undoubtedly cross the line. Just because these statements exist, it’s critical that we do not therefore conclude that they are the party at fault. In fact, I would speculate that more often than not, there’s a very very good reason why family and friends might resort to ugly name-calling and desperate conversations about how to achieve the best outcome in court.
Divorce is an incredibly ugly and intense process that I wouldn’t wish on my biggest enemy. It takes extensive intimate knowledge of a relationship in order to reach accurate conclusions about assigning fault to either party. Let’s be honest, we know next to nothing about Stephen crowders marriage, and who deserves the blame for what.
Its ya boy,raid shadow legends.
Give, you... give me the microtransactions!
Give me the money. Give YOU... give me the money! Okay?
my favorite part of every AJW video
The second “me” is a “ME”. She’s in full shrill mode
I love that quote clip
does she know that shes the mascot of the channel?
@@gavingibson8965what about that skeleton?
The $25,000 accusation is particular egregious, considering Texas law is _very_ unfavorable toward women when it comes to spousal maintenance. There is a $2,500 and seven year statutory cap on spousal maintenance. (And, in practice, seven years is for "extraordinary circumstances," like a recent cancer diagnosis.) It doesn't matter if you have a high school education and stayed at home raising your seven children while your high school sweetheart husband became a prominent neurosurgeon who started beating you and sleeping around. The cap is the cap.
You’re just a liar are you a it from DW or something? I know they hate Texas law because the SweJ are pro abortion
Don't know about any of this divorce stuff, but ever since Steven sperged out at DW I've guessed that he probably makes most things about him.
Ah well looks like DW’s manipulation works easy in you
@@david-468 guess so
@@david-468shame that basic English classes didn't work easy in you
@@iamjurell autocorrect one word and apparently I don’t know English? If that’s all you fake conservatives can say then I guess your argument is even worse then I initially thought
Suing and counter suing isn’t uncommon in a celebrity divorce. There is a ton of money at stake so they do this all the time. I think AJW is a little too biased to see things clearly
was wondering if anyone else sensed it, don’t know why he’s being so obtuse about it.
@@gavingibson8965 AJW is friends with Lauren Chen and Lauren has beef with Crowder. Not sure if this has anything to do with it, but could be part of it.
AJW is acting as if Crowder’s team should release all information and be fully transparent. Why would Crowder release Jared from signed agreements that will not benefit him at all?
@@jeffhenry8586 i’ll keep that in mind, thanks
@@jeffhenry8586@jeffhenry8586 oh its 100% part of it. "Oh you wanna be paid by DW?" Then say dumb shit...ta da
"Listen and Believe" is in full effect when this shyte happens and the courts and public opinion are always against men/ fathers.
Jared isn't an innocent in this Crowder is a dick but he didn't have to sign anything he could have spoke out but instead he took the deal plus getting involved in another divorce and actively trying to get his kids taken away is beyond scummy
You didn’t watch the video did you?
@@austinpierce6746Did he sign the nda and is he trying to get involved in Crowder's divorce?
@@austinpierce6746 no as all I need to know was how he acted in another man's problems so unless Jared suddely came out and said " i apologise for trying help to take a mans children with his ex " ? Then there is fxxk all to discuss dear
@@matthewrowe9903 Steven Crowder Literally abused Jared. He was extremely controlling, violent, prone to anger, and toxic against the people around him. Jared took Hillary's side in the divorce because of that. However, if you would watch the video, you would know that the vast majority of Jareds focus had nothing to do about crowder's divorce. It was Crowder that made the divorce the main topic.
Please stop playing apologetics for a man who needs to be humbled. Pride goes before the fall, and Crowder is falling hard. Its a sight to behold.
@@austinpierce6746 and yet he signed an nda ? Giving away his voice to protect others
I have never watched Crowder, ever. Don't know anything about him. Don't care to know anything about him, just because all I've heard has made it clear he's not my style. Having said that, I fully understand why someone who does a show like his would want an NDA or NDP or whatever. Someone leaving a show like his, often their next job is to talk sh*t about their previous job. That's what I've seen over and over again.
The problem is crowder made them sign NDAs while sexually harassing his employees
Lol, someone who leaves might talk bad so make them sign a thing saying they won't? That's the most snowflake thing I've ever heard of.
Wise.
@@derpsnarf4052 take the word "make" and change it to "agreed to" and you will see where you fucked up at
@@Anthony-fp2jb forgive my word choice, I'm sick, but I think you get the meaning of what I was saying
EDIT: I went back and checked, I didn't use the word "make"
From what I get from this video is LWC pulled specific things to make it seem a certain way….but we are also supposed to just take Jared at his word? I don’t think it’s fair either way. Also NDAs don’t protect crime. If Jared knows of abuse or crimes that have happened no NDA can get in the way of that. Also like NDAs or not, it was signed, he broke it, lawsuits follow broken contracts. Either way it’s all dumb.
Thank you. It's nice to see somebody actually acknowledge this.
Dude you are the absolute best. Anything I question, I come to the actual justice worrier for answers. Facts and a close analysis of EVERYTHING is your job. You do it well. It is basically entertainment and thought provoking content wrapped up perrrrty.
He didn't yell. He tried reasoning with her in a nasty way and told her to watch it in a nasty way.
Except that it’s not reasonable to expect your heavily pregnant wife to handle potentially dangerous chemicals.
@@ryanhubbard1885
I agree, it's like he wanted her to get hurt or something.
Sean, the issue isn't either one of the parties of the marriage asking for sole custody. Nobody cares about that because that's legitimately a matter for each party to consider on their own.
The reason why people are bringing it up at all is specifically because it's being stated by an unrelated, disgruntled ex employee that he is seeking for Crowder to lose his kids, and this same man is asking for sympathy. That's why it's relevant at all. It has nothing to do with Hillary and everything to do with Jared. You've completely missed the point.
So this thing where you point out that Steven is the one filing for sole custody while Hillary isn't doesn't make the point you think it does.
EXACTLY!!!!! THANK YOU FOR MAKING THAT VERY CLEAR, AND I HOPE SEAN ACTUALLY READS IT AND TAKES THE TIME TO THINK IT THROUGH. JARED IS COLLUDING WITH HAILEY'S FATHER TO USE PR CAMPAIGNS TO DESTROY CROWDER WHILE ALSO GETTING HAILEY (AND HER DADDY DEAREST) EVEN MORE MONEY FROM CROWDER IN ADDITION TO WHAT HE'S ALREADY PAYING HER. IT'S DISGUSTING!
But maybe that’s not the point of why he’s making the video? It seems to me that he’s trying to clear up ANY confusion as to the facts of this and who’s lying about what, and he’s not JUST talking about why Jared said what he said.
This video is about ALL of it.
The point is crowder will never let you be his bidet, so have some dignity and stop trying to be it.
Gynocentrism and "listen and believe" is in full effect. This is why men can never get a fair shake in the family courts.
@@derpsnarf4052 I'm sorry that me disagreeing with Sean hurt your feelings.
a disgruntled employee involved himself in his bosses divorce and leveraged it against him in an attempt to deny him any custody or visit time to his kids. just mean words. Have fun defending that.
He is defending it because he is a simp of lauren chen.
How would he have any actual effect on someones custody or visit time that the parent didnt warrant?
Maybe it's a legitimate concern? Have fun defending that.
If the argument is "Do we like Jared personally", that would indeed be hard to defend.
Since that's not the issue at hand, no one needs to defend that.
@@GenerationalDisappointment We saw the messages about him running a negativ emedia campaing for the exwife, so they would get more money and better deals in court. Thats how.
sorry to comment so much but HE IS PAYING FOR HIS LAWYER AND PAYING FOR THE OPPOSING LAWYER ... WHOM IS TRYING TO DESTROY HIM.... how is it fair that a man has to pay for someone else to destroy you. She FILED for Divorce??? what am i missing here? The man doesn't want to get divorced but is forced to FUND the Divorce Proceedings and PAY for the attorneys of the opposing side the whole time. regardless of the LAWFARE claim of ... Crowder is STILL paying up to 25k for his wife to pay a lawyer to oppose Him.
If you actually believe it trust his ex wife, you're silly af.
Why do you believe otherwise? Crowder is a proven liar so why just take his word?
@@WhatsTheTakeawayyou idiots keep saying that. It I’ve never seen these “proven” lies just he said she said , the only lies I see is the hours of footage deleted by Hillary
@@WhatsTheTakeaway
That's easy.
They are a mug club NPC who can't think for themselves.
Or
A fan who thinks Crowder can't do no wrong.
@@WhatsTheTakeaway When women demand child support and alimony, get 25k a month but then say "Yeah but I need more to pay for the kids" you know that woman is a liar and not to be trusted. She's already getting more than enough and to push the custody issues as leverage is just straight up vindictive bs that needs to be called out far more often than it is now.
If you don't want to believe Crowder then believe the Nanny.
We found the sexist
Maybe NOT donate to a cause, then say you’re impartial. That’s really sus.
At least he states it at the start of the video, so you know the next hour and nineteen minutes will be mental gymnastics to justify it.
I like how he doesn't want to talk about the divorce, 'it's not important', but talks for 80 minutes about contract minutiae. Very convenient because if you don't talk about the divorce proceedings, you don't have to bring up the fact that Jared and the ex are actively and explicitly out to defame Crowder and separate him from his kids. Inexcusable behaviour.
Yeah that's bizarre. "Oh Ben Shapiro and I are neutral in this but we also donated heavily to one side..."
@@JohnSmith-pn1vv Yeah, I really hate how most of the UA-cam Center / Right channels are all covering this. Like, not only is it really not their business, it just gets repetitive. Honestly had no idea LWC was this disliked by other creators for them to immediately throw him under the bus on little to no evidence other than hearsay.
@@BiscutTheGreatthe hate started not too long ago, when steven called out the DW publicly, especially considering it was really uncalled for and unnecessary..
the online right is a mess right now. smh. everyone is fighting.. people are getting more and more extreme.. it’s just so frustrating.
If the last two items are at question, why didn't Jared show those? He should have copies unless he was not smart enough to get them.
The fact that it doesn't bother you that he's been working with Hillary to smear lwc is incredibly problematic. If Jared signed an nda, he can't violate it post employment. We don't know what clauses were included or the final contract terms. If he didn't want to adhere up that, he shouldn't have signed it. He should've hired an attorney long before that. Or, hey, most cities and states have FREE legal assistance that anyone could avail themselves of.
Most of the rest of the country can't afford an attorney so if you failed to read your contract, that's your failure. Responsibility these days is at a premium and stupidity has a price.
I think your hated for Crowder is coloring your judgment on this as well, which was pretty evident in your last video about him. Nobody cares if you hate Crowder, but your analysis is flawed and lacking some crucial context that you claim lwc has to provide, when if it exists, Jared can provide as well.
It's clear most people don't understand a single bit of how nda or non-competes work and it's severely damaging your credibility in this realm.
I'm also confused why Jared can't just show the NDA, he has to have a copy.
It’s feeling like Dev talking about US law. Sean’s speciality is criminal stuff not contract law. Personally I excelled at tort law in law classes. That doesn’t make me an expert on contract or criminal law.
I remember thinking anytime I used to watch Crowder "Why is this boring unintelligent dude Gerald even on the show?". And this video reinforces that.
Somehow this went from Jared's journalistic independence to Stephen's divorce. I'm still at a loss finding the exact point at which that occured. I'm just trying to find the bridge. Have you seen the bridge? I ain't seen the bridge! Where's that confounded bridge?!
Jared suing the quarting for insinuating that he slept with Hilary is the bridge and explains EVERYTHING.
Steven's wife deleted against the judges orders all the footage leading up to their fight along with some 8,000 hours
Says who?
According to who?
You troglodytes replying, according to the judge , ya know what AJW would usually show except he’s extremely biased
According to Quartering, for one
@@danieldavis6288 Who cares about him, and why is he inserting himself into another man's divorce? Isn't that a big no-no in Crowder Land?
Failed to mention the deposition of the Midwife turned Nanny for the kids because Hillary didn't actually care for them, but rather stayed in her bedroom all day on social media instead of being a mom. That doesn't sound stable. And I'm with Pearl, the language she used in that Ring video was selected and choreographed to be broadcast in her favor. That nanny/midwife deposition was what turned me into doubting Hillary and trusting Steven in this sea of unknowns and half truths we get. She was IN THE HOUSE.
Yup, when I listened to what the nanny had to say I was solidly on Steven's side.
And there were at least two edits to the video.
I don't have much to say besides that I just never expected anyone with a half functioning brain to agree with Pearl.
I guess I don't have evidence of your half a functioning brain so I take that part back
Sean seems to be snuggly in the Daily Wire’s pocket these days. Thats the only reason he would jump into this topic unrelated to his usual content.
I can't take you seriously because you are unironically using Pearl as your source
I don’t even need the volume on to tell who is lying
Viva and Barnes covered this. Jared is not a honest actor in this and he is violating his non-compete clause and nondisclosure aggreements. I know you are sympathetic to him but he is violating what he agreed to uphold.
So Jared's non compete was not a non compete, but after he talked to a lawyer, he signed the NDA to get a carve out in the non compete. WTF?
Now he wants out of the NDA instead of the non compete so that he can earn a living? WTAF???
Smells like a fishery 3 days after a flood.
I can't even comprehend what you wrote
@@dt4676 Yeah, exactly! And I just wrote down what Jared said. Whole thing stinks.
@Naomi_Boyd He has found work since the original issues with the non compete which was years ago at this point. He wants out of the nda because he was served a lawsuit for talking with and supporting former employees who allegedly are experiencing similar situations.
Yea but the main issue is Crowder made him sign an NDA at all. Crowder made such a big deal about NDA with daily wire but now is being a hypocrite.
@@entheogenocideno. He didn't. The issue isn't an NDA or the DW's NDA. It's common to have certain protected assets.
When people start making wild accusations you serve them with a cease and decist. It's not rocket science and you're not automatically in the wrong for serving one. Jared is exactly right the point of a cease and decist is to stop the behavior in the cease and decist. It would take a court to determine who was in the right.
but you can't determine which side is right by looking at who served who.
AJW just believes Jared’s version of events and somehow doesn’t understand the purpose of a cease and desist.
The bias here is obvious and actually pretty sad.
The point of who served who is because Gerald said otherwise! It’s like y’all don’t listen
@@natenecocheawe definitely didnt watch the same video
I don't like what you are saying. The next time we interact, it will be my lawyers sending you a cease and desist.
@@hocky-ham324-zg8zc AJW did the same thing as Gerald he made up shit and lied to you as the summery is what happened during the meeting you dont know who recommended what so the lier is calling a lier a lier who do you believe he also lied that drowning a former partner in legal procedure when fighting for custody was a rare case when he himself has videos pointing out how common this is used against men AJW just lost all trust he has built up here in one video i dont think what Steven is doing is right but i wont lie about this shit
When you attempt to prove you're straight by simping for your ex-boss's ex-wife.
Everybody's a bad guy except Steven Crowder? hmmmmmmm?
That's how idolatry works.
Just like Fauci is a bad guy, but Trump is excused from giving Fauci so much power to begin with.
The buck stops with they person you don't like, in Crowderstan land
1:21:49 - Very bad take. You may never have been involved in lawsuits, but I have, as an expert witness and as a plaintiff. No attorney will allow a client to sign off on a mediation agreement without a confidentiality provision. It simply wouldn't happen if your attorney was competent. Also, Crowder addressed the mediation in the opening of the next show after the one you reviewed here with Gerald if you really want to know.
He also asked us all to stop going after everyone for it. He has a point. (Speaking for myself.)
Then he wouldn't be able to say what he is saying
30 seconds into the video: I dont want to do the TMZ video
^timestamp: "show us the evidence steven!"
That's not a bad take that's straight out Clown World Activities
Jared could be the bestest boy in every other aspect of his life and Steven could be the biggest POS in the whole world, but the fact that Jared inserted himself in another man's divorce makes him a piece of garbage. I hope you can get your money back Sean, because it looks like you are backing a piece of s**t.
a hundred percent
Have you ever had an original thought? I swear, if I have to hear one more idiot say “he inserted himself in the divorce…” God you people are morons.
💯
Wait he sent money 2 that guy, for a fund that would help legally attack steven?
Big facts
The only innocents involved here are the children.
However, I have to agree with most of the people in the comments section, and say involving yourself in someone else’s divorce makes you a fuc|
Texting a friend who is going through a divorce is not inserting anything lol
@@WhatsTheTakeaway If thats all that took place, sure.
But, that’s not what happened here now, is it?
Again, getting involved at any level in someone else’s divorce, is as low as one could get. Especially when, given the comments Jared has made about access to his children, and the blatantly obvious motive to get involved is out of spite, I would categorize this as “getting involved”.
Well no Hillary is also a victim as Steven clearly abused her .. what is wrong with you?
10 whole years of marriage, but the divorce only happens once they have kids.
Does anyone else not find this odd?
Edit: for any comments saying "having kids is hard" or "it changes the relationship," I have 3. Each one made our marriage stronger. I can't fathom being married to someone for a rocky 10 years and thinking having kids is a good idea. Or having 10 amazing years and pregnancy completely ruining it.
These 2 clearly had a strained relationship the whole time and both of them were lying to each other AND themselves about whether it truly was strained or not.
Having kids either makes or breaks a couple. Especially one that was already rocky.
? His talking to her like that with her giant belly was what was beyond odd, and what would be still odder is her not divorcing him after that.
@@naysayer1238 Yeah, she staged that.
Having kids adds gasoline to the fire. My wife just had a kid 2 weeks ago, and it's not easy/takes a toll on the relationship.
Crowder was probably like that already, but having.... twins at that... could definitely make him worse than what he originally was.
@@MeanBeanComedy cope
"Her raising the babies and SC being the 'cool dad'" sounds a lot like she is looking for full custody while SC gets fun time weekend visitation with the children. Doesnt sound like co parenting to me.
Except according to the testimony of the nanny she’s not raising the kids. She spent all her time online and watching TV in her room and Stephen took care of them when he was there.
Ya because every father wants to only come home to their kids on weekends, and when he knows the mother is constantly manipulating them against him every chance she gets, I wonder why he’d make sure the kids have fun with him? Anyone’s who’s been through or seen a modern divorce knows this game. Get some perspective.
@@higcraigerson2737 if your comment was for me you misread what I said. If it wasn’t for me then preach!
Honestly, Sean, I think you may be slightly wrong on this whole thing. I quit watching Crowder a while ago, because the show has gone down hill from when I was in mug club years ago (joined for one year during the whole Vox thing), and the drama with Shapiro's company made it worse, but it seems that Jared is in the wrong for inserting himself into the divorce. I guess, I believe that if Crowder was so wrong back in the day, why didn't Jared try to contest the NDA and non-compete back when they were made? If the non-compete was not valid, why didnt he sue for wrongful termination when he was "unlawfully terminated" by his new employer after leaving? The entire situation is fishy
An explanation can be he is one man with small influence who may not have had the resources or power to fight a big company so he sighed the papers
@@anjolatope-babalola2338 That doesn’t make sense because a lot of lawyers would have done it pro bono or taken a cut of the settlement. Especially one politically motivated.
I almost missed the “illegally fired” part. If it were true he could just file a claim with the labor board if he can’t afford an attorney but I do think there are a ton of attorneys who’d take that case.
Because of the time and financial burden, a lot of times it’s just easier to move on instead of fighting.
@@debanydoombringer1385 🤣🤣🤣 this is not the movies, do you know how hard it would to get a lawyer to take up a pro Bono case, especially one with little upside. Law suites are long and expensive. single lawyers or small firms won't take the case as they need payment now, while the settlement won't entize big law firms
Jared can get work, he is just tainted. He has broken his NDA, and should pay. He is a Weasle.
I guess we just ignore the 18 seconds of the ring camera footage that Hillary deleted, along with thousands of hours of additional footage.
Watch the video, Sean explains this. So many Crowderstans refuse to watch anything critical of Crowder but somehow know its all wrong...
I don't mean to be a dick but do you have a link to the court document that I can browse at my leisure?
How is it unusual to sue the people responsible for damaging your company? Shawn, what are you doing, man?
He's pointing out the hypocrisy, Crowder got angry at Dailywire for doing less than this, meanwhile he's behind the scenes controlling his employees speech and inhibiting their careers
@@MentokTheMindTaker If Jared had stayed out of the divorce none of this happens. Jared is clearly a scumbag, I don't see how people even defend what he has done. Maybe Crowder is too, IDK if what Jared is saying is true or not, but involving yourself in an ex employers divorce is a scumbag move.
@@MentokTheMindTaker if true, this is definitely worse than what the DW tried with LWC. I don't think there's enough evidence to take a solid stance one way or another, I am slightly leaning Jared though. Depending on how things develop that can change.
@@MentokTheMindTaker To be fair, Jared left a long time ago and is the only one who seems to have had these issues. That being said, free speech is between you and the government, not you and an ex-employer.
How is this the drama you cover and not Candace Owens vs DW?
Because there is very little in the public record to analyze with regard to why Candace and DW parted ways. Also, Candace already has a new gig lined up on Locals, so there's clearly not any kind of non-compete nor any kind of legal action either real or implied, which makes it a very different situation.
Why would you donate to ANY of these people?????
It's definitely gay Jared. I don't even like Crowder, but this looks like straight up blackmail.
You’re saying Jared is blackmailing Crowder???
Its not blackmail. Its extortion
Not straight blackmail. Gay blackmail. Gay gay!
You're falling for it. This video THOROUGHLY debunks this claim.
You stans got the DW vs. Crowder thing wrong before. You got Candace vs. Crowder wrong. When will you learn?
@@hughmungus7425lol
Litigation against a broken NDA is not "lawfare", its honoring the terms of the agreement.
Except for sexual assault. "Revenge of the cis" guys covered it. They fucked Jared.
Exactly.
@@zackthebongripper7274NDAs do not protect against crime. If a crime was committed, where’s the report?
LOL, keep doing you bro. Wild that yall turn into sjws so quickly.
@@seanprice9626Since when do SJWs support NDAs?
Jist remember... You CAN have a problem with what Crowder's in-laws are doing AND still be critical of his business practices
There are no heroes here, just villains and victims.
Follow God not men.
I watched crowder but I have never been fan of him. I liked his show, his staff, etc. His ego and attitude are obnoxious. I used to love change my mind. He just got bullied on one. Now, I find him unwatchable even if I really like Jim Beurer.
I agree completely. Although talented, and honestly, I rarely watched since Jared left, he really was half the show. Crowder always gave a strong vibe that behind the scenes he's an egomaniac.
He got rid of Jared for the same reason he got rid of Landau. He has to be the biggest star in the room. Which is fine, but its not hard to outshine Crowder. He is not really funny.
@@nobodynever7884 Still 100times funnier than Landau. I was relieved when he left. Shit takes and unfunny. He added nothing to the show and lied afterwards.
@8asw8 I agree and how come Dave and Jered are not funny without LWC just a thought.....
@user-bw9lf1xf5p Dave is somewhat funny regardless. Jared is not really a comedian and has been blocked from working since leaving LWC so seems like you are just simping for crowder. Dave was never that funny on LWC. You know how people call the View audience slapping seals. Crowder stans are similar. Echo chambers on both sides annoy me. That's why I like AJW, Stitch and Adam, Lex Friedman, Destiny(even if he annoys me at times), Coleman, Rogan, The hill, etc. l also love PBD, Rubin report, Owens, etc. I used to like crowder. His ego and loud mouth persona were a bit obnoxious. All past employees have a similar narrative which makes him seem like the bully he was trying to make DW out to be. The way crowder CEO tried to manuplate and spin the story was complete bad faith. Not the 1st time Crowder acted like a leftist. He was a voice on a children's cartoon show and from Canada. He is not blue collar. I don't see why so many worship him and Tim Pool. Pool seems like a better dude TBF
Gerald is a tool for Crowder.
💯
And Sean is a tool for the daily wire
@@david-468
I seen AJW lay into everyone equally.
Unless I missed a video where he is protecting the DW.
@@valor1omega every video including this one lol
Honestly I wouldn’t sign an NDA under any circumstance.
If you had an employee that quit and was not successful and the only grift was to disparage you and insert themselves into your messy divorce and raise 100k while inserting himself into that shitty situation. Dave and quarter black just fine. On blaze being successful. But Jarrod has zero to add. That’s his problem. He has nothing to offer.
You're acting like the dude was unfunny which is severely untrue. Ask most people who remember those days.
This has been ongoing since he left.
He was an excellent side kick to Crowder, greatly improved the vibe and commentary of the show. Then he was just gone, didn’t even get to say goodbye. I never liked the show afterwards, every other individual or group just seemed to kiss Crowder’s rump. I found the show unwatchable. When Jarrod was on I watched very regularly, now I haven’t watched in years. Everybody sucks in this story except the babies and the dog.
@@lilolmecjyou must not have because he got a goodbye. They did a bunch of clips and everything.
@@KadenaSKK The show revolves around Steven Blake Crowder so he is always the funny one. I wanted to find his guests funny, I mean that seriously, but I would always laugh at Crowder.
Would’ve waited to donate for more information
I'm a conservative and i have really enjoyed the downfall of Crowder. He is a cringe boomer humor grifter. We don't need shit parody songs Steven, we already have Tom McDonald stinking up the joint.
Well done Sean.
Thank you. I just can’t stand Crowder. He is not an honest actor. He plays dumb on purpose all the time.
Thanks for being honest that you idiots are attacking and lying simply because you don’t like him, and you call yourselves “conservative” hahaha
You aren't exactly wrong. I have not listened to Crowder for years. I was not shocked by Dave's statement that Crowder had a light telling him to shut up. It is obvious that was what was going on. Dave is much more funny than Crowder and he would be on a roll and then all of a sudden shut up. The other thing that always annoyed me is that Crowder would go off on a tangent about something dumb. Crowder will say some things that would get me laughing but then he would just go on and on and beat that horse long after it was dead. He would say something that was funny and then talk about it for five minutes as if he had to tell us that he was funny.
Also NDAs are not “unconstitutional” lol
ANY divorced father will tell you that if another man interferes in your relationship with your kids, nothing is off the table. Just hearing Jared mention Crowder’s kids is infuriating…
Why did Crowder want to take the kids away from Hillary?
@@michaelvanderwal7390men rarely get full custody even in the most extreme circumstances. If a lawyer told him he may have grounds to get it, maybe there is something crazy going on. Any good lawyer would tell a man (if his ex wife was a good mom) to ask for joint custody so child support is limited. Joint custody is the best case scenario for both of them but people mad in divorces never see that
@michaelvanderwal7390 if a stay at home mother is pushing her kids off on a nanny, then tries to use them as pawns in a divorce, do you think she really has the children's best interest at heart?
Police officers regularly intervene between kids and their father. Rightfully, courts do too.
I agree, that’s a dirty move and he deserves a black eye for that! Coward behavior! Stay out of it, it’s none of his business!
You are one of my favorite youtubers brother. Thank you for the breakdown
I know people like Crowder.
Funnily enough, they defended Crowder during the Daily Wire debacle, without even bothering to watch Jeremy's response and explanation.
This whole thing stinks.
funny because I am sure DW deals are not that good or ideal especially for "talent" that is basically already fully set up and operational by themselves so makes sense its not a good deal for crowder but that doesn't really mean its scam. but wild thing is crowders legal agreements with his employees are way way way worse than what he did.
I did watch Jeremy’s video, and it would only convince but the dumbest of people.
The problem crowder had that basically stopped any negotiations with DW was that the DW essentially sucks off youtube and any advertiser, they ignore, or make milquetoast “acceptable points” on a lot of topics because it would lead to demonetization or cancel campaigns. THAT MEANS THEY’RE CONTROLLED OPPOSITION.
Steven is paying for HER lawyers.
Watch the video from their Nanny. Quite interesting.
Jerad had a lawyer when he signed his NDA.
Sure he may be a dick to work with, but when the nanny said she just laid in bed all day while Steven and the nanny planed together to take care of the children, when she deleted all the ring videos (not sure if it was ring) and released an edited video, that turned me off against her.
Screw Daily Wire!! 😡🤬