Emma Vigeland Destroyed On Crime
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 чер 2023
- In this video I discuss my appearance on Culture War where I went from debater to moderator in record time. I explain how Emma was wrong on crime & what I believe were her intentions with this appearance
Website: www.actualjusticewarrior.com/
linktr.ee/ActualJustice
Odysee: odysee.com/@actualjusticewarr...
Rumble: rumble.com/ActualJusticeWarrior
Instagram NEW: / actualjustice
Twitch: / actualjusticewarrior
Utreon: utreon.com/c/ActualJusticeWar...
2nd Channel: / ajw2dreamscometrue
TeeSpring Store: teespring.com/stores/actualju...
New Store: actualjusticewarrior.myspread...
Gettr: gettr.com/user/iamsean90
Parler: parler.com/profile/Actualjust...
www.minds.com/actualjusticewa...
Support me on Patreon: / seanfitzgerald
Paypal: www.paypal.me/Iamsean90
Venmo: venmo.com/iamsean90
Support me on Subscribe Star: www.subscribestar.com/seanfit...
Gab: gab.com/Iamsean90
Twitter / iamsean90
Backup Twitter / ajwsean
Bitchute: www.bitchute.com/actualjustic...
Discord: / discord
3rd: / dudemonkeyhq
Get Storable Food: www.preparewithajw.com
Get Pocketnet: pocketnet.app/actualjusticewa...
Podcast Links:
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/1o0q86A...
Apple: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Google Podcast: podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0...
Sources:
Full Video: ua-cam.com/users/liveSOnfHUhU...
Challenge To Sam Seder: / 1672631103020990465
Disparity In Arrests NYC: www.manhattan-institute.org/h...
Article On crime & purpose of prisons: www.city-journal.org/james-q-...
Crime Decline Great Recession: www.theatlantic.com/business/...
New Yorker Income Inequality Charts: www.newyorker.com/news/john-c...
Brennan Center Mass Incarceration losing effectiveness post 2000t: www.brennancenter.org/our-wor...
Compstat Write Up: nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/...
NYPD Crime Data Referenced: www.nyc.gov/site/nypd/stats/r...
Recessions & Crime: citymonitor.ai/economy/recess...
Bloomberg Audio: • Bloomberg: Put All The...
Video About The Long Case & TYT: • MIRRORED: Young Turks ...
#TimPool #CultureWar #IamSean90
FAIR USE NOTICE
This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright. - Комедії
Sam Seder has accepted the debate challenge
Get ‘im!
Hopefully you crush that propagandist!
Get your buckets ready.
Watch out he might swap in Ethan Klein
How many buckets did he request?
Emma : "Bringing up specific examples is a way to dodge context"
Also emma "I dont argue with abstract concepts. Be specific"
She jumped between these two contradictory statements throughout the show.
She was incoherent.
But what percentage of Tim’s viewers would notice the contradiction? Most think she did OK.
@@DovidMI don't think so. Most people in the chat and in the comments are her fans. They always flood the comments in these kinds of videos. Often they also tries to hide that they're SJW and pretends to be moderate/right-wing. It's something I have observed for years now. It's not a coincidence but a targeted effort with pre planing from the most active.
No she didnt
@@DovidM think the vast majority of Tim pool viewers caught on to her shite within the first 15 minutes or so of her talking
@@DovidMI don’t think that’s true. Most comments seem against her
29:49 Emma acting like she could’ve been held in jail indefinitely if she’d been caught with a gram of whatever after being randomly stopped and frisked is both precious and highly disingenuous.
EVERY RACE AND GENDER SHALL BE TREATED EXACTLY EQUALLY. STATISTICAL INFERENCE IS RACIST!
Lol. Yes it was. I can’t believe how well she relates to her fellow murderers in nyc.
@@Kunfucious577 😂she really understands their plight
@@Kunfucious577 NYC is safer than the poorly managed red cities.
That's true. But at the same time, it's not like it's all sunshine and roses. Disconnected, pheaux empathetic rich people make things up because they don't know what it's like to live in that environment or know anyone who's been in that circumstance.
What usually ends up happening is that you go to jail for a few months and all your shit gets repoed in the meantime, basically setting you back at the proverbial square one. Petty possession charges DO fuck people over, just not in the way Emma describes which leads to the entire premise being damaged as a whole by her mouth.
We need police, judge and prosecutor accountability. Just have a pathway for people to have justice if someone is corrupt.
Emma is an excellent example that being a modern democrat means being stupid on purpose.
Stupid or evil. That's what democrats always have been
Pretty sure she's just stupid in real life. But I get your point.
She was awarded a degree for listening and seeing and repeating everything she see and hears as proof from her college professors.
She then was given a job because she had a vaagina.
SHe knows nothing about the real world, or actual hard work, criminality/race statistics while sitting in her champagne glass tower.
I've seen some of her videos, yes I can confirm this is the case. She made a video about why Ben Shapiro doesn't understand his own point. No Emma it is u who didn't understand before turning the record button on.
Ignorance like diversity is her strength.
I mean here's a thought: crime is bad, don't do crime. These people that try to humanize someone that wouldn't hesitate to kill them is hilarious to me.
Thats progs for me
"So what you're saying is that we should let people be raped and murdered on Riker's Island?" "I did hard drugs at one point. If I got Terry stopped, I could have gotten sent to Riker's Island!"
First off, if Riker's Island is so bad, fix it. Second, if the alternative is to let accused murderers out back into the general public, yes, let's put them somewhere else regardless of the danger it puts them in, and yes, if you are carrying illegal drugs it's not unheard of that you'll be arrested if caught. They're illegal for a reason, and if you want to be civilly disobedient, then getting arrested is part of that.
The issue isn’t pøverty, it’s cułture. I looked up the following information last year, so likely there will be some changes.
Most Dangerous/Víolent Cities (US):
1. Detroit, MI
2. Memphis, TN
3. Birmingham, AL
4. Baltimore, MD
5. St. Louis, MO
6. Kansas City, MO
7. Cleveland, OH
8. Little Rock, AR
9. Milwaukee, WI
10. Stockton, CA
How about poorest cities:
1. Memphis, Tennessee 42.3%
2. Detroit, Michigan 36.1%
3. Baltimore, Maryland 34.1%
4. Miami, Florida 31.7%
5. Fresno, California 31.5%
6. Buffalo, New York 30.9%
7. Newark, New Jersey 30.4%
8. Toledo, Ohio 30.1%
9. Milwaukee, Wisconsin 29.9%
10. St. Louis, Missouri 29.2%
So if the poorest aren’t always the most dangerous, what are the demographics of the most dangerous:
1. Detroit - Black or African American: 78.33% White: 14.70% Other race: 3.06% Two or more races: 1.84%
2. Memphis - Black or African American: 64.11% White: 29.23% Other race: 3.28% Asian: 1.72%
3. Birmingham- Black or African American: 69.85% White: 25.81% Two or more races: 1.49% Other race: 1.45%
4. Baltimore - Black or African American: 62.35% White: 30.46% Asian: 2.58% Two or more races: 2.49%
5. St Louis - Black or African American: 44.9%, White: 44.5%, Asian: 3.44%, Two+: 2.54%
6. Kansas City - White: 60.90% Black or African American: 28.21% Other race: 4.00% Two or more races: 3.58%
(Note: Look at that KC broke the trend, let’s look at the most dangerous neighborhoods. Washington Wheatley is the most dangerous and it is Black or African American: 75.9%, White: 13.3%, Two+: 6%, Asian: 1.9%, Other : 3%
7. Cleveland - African American: 48.8%, White: 40%, Two+: 4.4%, Asian: 2.6%. Other: 4.2%
8. Little Rock - White: 50.29% Black or African American: 42.04% Asian: 3.30% Two or more races: 2.25%
(Note: we have another apparent trend breaker, what’s the most dangerous neighborhoods? South End is the most dangerous and it is Black or African American: 90.1%, White: 3.4%, Two+: 3%, Other: 3.5%… Looks like the trend isn’t broken after all).
9. Milwaukee - White: 44.35% Black or African American: 38.75% Other race: 7.98% Asian: 4.26%
(Note: Most dangerous neighborhoods? Metcalfe Park is the most dangerous and it is Black or African American: 86%, White: 3%, Asian: 8%, Two+: 3%… Trend still intact).
10. Stockton - White: 45%, Asian: 22%, Two +: 12%, Black or African American: (What’s the most dangerous neighborhoods? Too many different neighborhoods came up without an agreement on just one… So does this break the trend? It does if you think this is only about race but it doesn’t if you realize it’s about culture. A culture can cross racíal lines, while still being predominant in one).
I don't know how anyone can call themselves a human anymore for viciously attacking and killing senior citizens.
@@Sassarai916It's a sick world.
Sean, you are such a vicious debater. You're sharp and quick. When you say "I'm not here to win over the audience but I will because I'm correct" in such a matter-of-fact tone killed me.
He's a tool
Silly answers for big problem
If you wanna live in a state run police land he's your guy
The issue is she doesn't think she was crushed. Despite facts, evidence w/o emotions, she just KNOWS you're insane. The insane ones think everyone else is insane.
On the subject of crime and racism, all you need to know about Emma here is the fact that it's pretty much guaranteed she lives nowhere near the "black and brown" people she claims to care so much about
Leftists hate brown people
True
and she doesn't seem to care about the victims( black and brown) of those criminals.
💯
Neither do you nor the majority of white people thanks to the systemic racism of Jim Crow, redlining, blockbusting, housing discrimination, and mortgage loan discrimination.
I got so mad when Sean pointed out that you could reduce the shoplifting rate by 1/3 simply by arresting, charging, and imprisoning 300 of the constant repeat offenders, and Emma just dismissed it hautily to make a dig about bail reform.
Worse yet was Sean suggesting to lock up repeat offenders, and Emma said "So on what basis will you determine who is a repeat offender?". Sometimes people just destroy themselves with stupid comments.
Honestly there’s really no point in these “debates”.. they are all the same
@linusgustafsson2629 _leftist sets herself on fire_
"I totally won this debate"
This is how it works in their heads.
@@brianmeen2158 The point is entertainment. Also lots of other reasons.
@@brianmeen2158 "omg so you just want to lock everybody up" nah we want to skip the foreplay and just get rid of the criminal sociopaths
"The nahtsee shooter watched your show" is equivalent of saying marlyn manson is partly to blame for columbine.
Crime needs to be under control before our community dies. Once the businesses leave, we'll have to place to work, or get services. I feel for people who are struggling, but taking everybody down with you is not a solution I will get behind.
Once all the shops leave the hood then those people will branch out and victimize the ones who claim it's all sweet people who just need a loaf of bread to feed their kids. At that point things will change. Elitists only care about the sad poor people until those people start victimizing them 😂
What i hated about emma is how smug she acted despite knowing NOTHING.
Her entire goal was to disagree with Tim. She would take any position so long as Tim disagreed. That's why when she brought something up that Tim agreed with, she brushed it off.
You just described extremist ideology.
@@terdsie - Yes. The Cannon of Leftism. Oppose and destroy. Ignore the fact that you're least likely to survive if society collapses.
But violent crime is caused by poverty REEEEEE
@@joshjohnson2600feel like Serfs did the same thing.
Remember, this is a woman who attended a high school that costs $46k a year. I hate to generalize but she was brought up being told low income = victim, and to help - we must always excuse their actions (because it's never impacting us in our gated communities!).
Bingo
She's a white supremacist that feels bad for doing nothing to help people she considered inferior because of their race
The issue isn’t pøverty, it’s cułture. I looked up the following information last year, so likely there will be some changes.
Most Dangerous/Víolent Cities (US):
1. Detroit, MI
2. Memphis, TN
3. Birmingham, AL
4. Baltimore, MD
5. St. Louis, MO
6. Kansas City, MO
7. Cleveland, OH
8. Little Rock, AR
9. Milwaukee, WI
10. Stockton, CA
How about poorest cities:
1. Memphis, Tennessee 42.3%
2. Detroit, Michigan 36.1%
3. Baltimore, Maryland 34.1%
4. Miami, Florida 31.7%
5. Fresno, California 31.5%
6. Buffalo, New York 30.9%
7. Newark, New Jersey 30.4%
8. Toledo, Ohio 30.1%
9. Milwaukee, Wisconsin 29.9%
10. St. Louis, Missouri 29.2%
So if the poorest aren’t always the most dangerous, what are the demographics of the most dangerous:
1. Detroit - Black or African American: 78.33% White: 14.70% Other race: 3.06% Two or more races: 1.84%
2. Memphis - Black or African American: 64.11% White: 29.23% Other race: 3.28% Asian: 1.72%
3. Birmingham- Black or African American: 69.85% White: 25.81% Two or more races: 1.49% Other race: 1.45%
4. Baltimore - Black or African American: 62.35% White: 30.46% Asian: 2.58% Two or more races: 2.49%
5. St Louis - Black or African American: 44.9%, White: 44.5%, Asian: 3.44%, Two+: 2.54%
6. Kansas City - White: 60.90% Black or African American: 28.21% Other race: 4.00% Two or more races: 3.58%
(Note: Look at that KC broke the trend, let’s look at the most dangerous neighborhoods. Washington Wheatley is the most dangerous and it is Black or African American: 75.9%, White: 13.3%, Two+: 6%, Asian: 1.9%, Other : 3%
7. Cleveland - African American: 48.8%, White: 40%, Two+: 4.4%, Asian: 2.6%. Other: 4.2%
8. Little Rock - White: 50.29% Black or African American: 42.04% Asian: 3.30% Two or more races: 2.25%
(Note: we have another apparent trend breaker, what’s the most dangerous neighborhoods? South End is the most dangerous and it is Black or African American: 90.1%, White: 3.4%, Two+: 3%, Other: 3.5%… Looks like the trend isn’t broken after all).
9. Milwaukee - White: 44.35% Black or African American: 38.75% Other race: 7.98% Asian: 4.26%
(Note: Most dangerous neighborhoods? Metcalfe Park is the most dangerous and it is Black or African American: 86%, White: 3%, Asian: 8%, Two+: 3%… Trend still intact).
10. Stockton - White: 45%, Asian: 22%, Two +: 12%, Black or African American: (What’s the most dangerous neighborhoods? Too many different neighborhoods came up without an agreement on just one… So does this break the trend? It does if you think this is only about race but it doesn’t if you realize it’s about culture. A culture can cross racíal lines, while still being predominant in one).
Shes also 30 and looks like shes 45.
Her pre K was nearly that price
Sean that was one of the best Timcast episodes because of YOU. Thank you for your intelligence, research and time.
Sean: “So when you’re talking about poverty leading to crime, what are you basing that off of?”
Emma: “All of human history.”
THAT, ladies and gentlemen, is how you know Emma is not giving an honest answer: She replies with a broad, hand-waved answer and doesn’t respond with anything _specific._
Any time someone tries to give a non-specific, vague answer to a question like this, FORCE them to give a specific, quantifiable example that they can recall because there should be at least ONE they can pull out in a discussion.
The root cause of criminality is low moral character, not “poverty”. To say that poverty causes crime is to suggest that all poor people are criminals, or should be expected to commit crime, or be suspected of criminality. This is a condescending view of people of low income. There are many people that’ve risen up from modest means to highly successful lives.
If stealing is easy and benefits you, then it really depends how much it benefit you and how bad consequences are. If you are a minor, actually stealing food so you can eat (I literally did this) them it is very easy, benefits you, and getting caught is a greater benefit. Breakfast, lunch, and dinner in juvi. Lol it's not necessarily a bad thing to get "punished" for it.
@@bobjohnson1633Yes, no one would argue that what you stated doesn’t make sense but it’s the people that say pøverty is the cause of “vīolent” críme that aren’t correct. Víolent críme is caused by bad people, not pøverty, and there is no way around that.
The issue isn’t pøverty, it’s cułture. I looked up the following information last year, so likely there will be some changes.
Most Dangerous/Víolent Cities (US):
1. Detroit, MI
2. Memphis, TN
3. Birmingham, AL
4. Baltimore, MD
5. St. Louis, MO
6. Kansas City, MO
7. Cleveland, OH
8. Little Rock, AR
9. Milwaukee, WI
10. Stockton, CA
How about poorest cities:
1. Memphis, Tennessee 42.3%
2. Detroit, Michigan 36.1%
3. Baltimore, Maryland 34.1%
4. Miami, Florida 31.7%
5. Fresno, California 31.5%
6. Buffalo, New York 30.9%
7. Newark, New Jersey 30.4%
8. Toledo, Ohio 30.1%
9. Milwaukee, Wisconsin 29.9%
10. St. Louis, Missouri 29.2%
So if the poorest aren’t always the most dangerous, what are the demographics of the most dangerous:
1. Detroit - Black or African American: 78.33% White: 14.70% Other race: 3.06% Two or more races: 1.84%
2. Memphis - Black or African American: 64.11% White: 29.23% Other race: 3.28% Asian: 1.72%
3. Birmingham- Black or African American: 69.85% White: 25.81% Two or more races: 1.49% Other race: 1.45%
4. Baltimore - Black or African American: 62.35% White: 30.46% Asian: 2.58% Two or more races: 2.49%
5. St Louis - Black or African American: 44.9%, White: 44.5%, Asian: 3.44%, Two+: 2.54%
6. Kansas City - White: 60.90% Black or African American: 28.21% Other race: 4.00% Two or more races: 3.58%
(Note: Look at that KC broke the trend, let’s look at the most dangerous neighborhoods. Washington Wheatley is the most dangerous and it is Black or African American: 75.9%, White: 13.3%, Two+: 6%, Asian: 1.9%, Other : 3%
7. Cleveland - African American: 48.8%, White: 40%, Two+: 4.4%, Asian: 2.6%. Other: 4.2%
8. Little Rock - White: 50.29% Black or African American: 42.04% Asian: 3.30% Two or more races: 2.25%
(Note: we have another apparent trend breaker, what’s the most dangerous neighborhoods? South End is the most dangerous and it is Black or African American: 90.1%, White: 3.4%, Two+: 3%, Other: 3.5%… Looks like the trend isn’t broken after all).
9. Milwaukee - White: 44.35% Black or African American: 38.75% Other race: 7.98% Asian: 4.26%
(Note: Most dangerous neighborhoods? Metcalfe Park is the most dangerous and it is Black or African American: 86%, White: 3%, Asian: 8%, Two+: 3%… Trend still intact).
10. Stockton - White: 45%, Asian: 22%, Two +: 12%, Black or African American: (What’s the most dangerous neighborhoods? Too many different neighborhoods came up without an agreement on just one… So does this break the trend? It does if you think this is only about race but it doesn’t if you realize it’s about culture. A culture can cross racíal lines, while still being predominant in one).
"Poverty creates crime" is also debunked every single time you hear about someone wealthy committing criminal acts, which as of late, is quite a bit!
@@GiantBoarMonster
Socialism is essentially the government granting itself the authority to steal your money.
I used to know high school kids who shoplifted from the mall just because of the thrill of it. They didn’t want to buy stuff if they could get away with stealing it. Emma has no idea the “pathology” of shoplifters. Winona Ryder was a rich actress who developed the “pathology” for shoplifting. She wasn’t poor.
Exactly. People like her don’t live in reality. They reject common sense, for fake empathy and virtue signaling.
The issue isn’t pøverty, it’s cułture. I looked up the following information last year, so likely there will be some changes.
Most Dangerous/Víolent Cities (US):
1. Detroit, MI
2. Memphis, TN
3. Birmingham, AL
4. Baltimore, MD
5. St. Louis, MO
6. Kansas City, MO
7. Cleveland, OH
8. Little Rock, AR
9. Milwaukee, WI
10. Stockton, CA
How about poorest cities:
1. Memphis, Tennessee 42.3%
2. Detroit, Michigan 36.1%
3. Baltimore, Maryland 34.1%
4. Miami, Florida 31.7%
5. Fresno, California 31.5%
6. Buffalo, New York 30.9%
7. Newark, New Jersey 30.4%
8. Toledo, Ohio 30.1%
9. Milwaukee, Wisconsin 29.9%
10. St. Louis, Missouri 29.2%
So if the poorest aren’t always the most dangerous, what are the demographics of the most dangerous:
1. Detroit - Black or African American: 78.33% White: 14.70% Other race: 3.06% Two or more races: 1.84%
2. Memphis - Black or African American: 64.11% White: 29.23% Other race: 3.28% Asian: 1.72%
3. Birmingham- Black or African American: 69.85% White: 25.81% Two or more races: 1.49% Other race: 1.45%
4. Baltimore - Black or African American: 62.35% White: 30.46% Asian: 2.58% Two or more races: 2.49%
5. St Louis - Black or African American: 44.9%, White: 44.5%, Asian: 3.44%, Two+: 2.54%
6. Kansas City - White: 60.90% Black or African American: 28.21% Other race: 4.00% Two or more races: 3.58%
(Note: Look at that KC broke the trend, let’s look at the most dangerous neighborhoods. Washington Wheatley is the most dangerous and it is Black or African American: 75.9%, White: 13.3%, Two+: 6%, Asian: 1.9%, Other : 3%
7. Cleveland - African American: 48.8%, White: 40%, Two+: 4.4%, Asian: 2.6%. Other: 4.2%
8. Little Rock - White: 50.29% Black or African American: 42.04% Asian: 3.30% Two or more races: 2.25%
(Note: we have another apparent trend breaker, what’s the most dangerous neighborhoods? South End is the most dangerous and it is Black or African American: 90.1%, White: 3.4%, Two+: 3%, Other: 3.5%… Looks like the trend isn’t broken after all).
9. Milwaukee - White: 44.35% Black or African American: 38.75% Other race: 7.98% Asian: 4.26%
(Note: Most dangerous neighborhoods? Metcalfe Park is the most dangerous and it is Black or African American: 86%, White: 3%, Asian: 8%, Two+: 3%… Trend still intact).
10. Stockton - White: 45%, Asian: 22%, Two +: 12%, Black or African American: (What’s the most dangerous neighborhoods? Too many different neighborhoods came up without an agreement on just one… So does this break the trend? It does if you think this is only about race but it doesn’t if you realize it’s about culture. A culture can cross racíal lines, while still being predominant in one).
Kleptomania
During the riots in Ferguson looters stole beer, weaves and lottery tickets in the "mostly peaceful" name of civil rights.
@@GhostSalthanks for the data. Most interesting although not surprising👍🏻
I could tell Sean was gaming out the arguments, but he had whole battle plans, prepared arguments, and contingencies which we never heard in the debate.
She's so just...wrong in everything she does you get like second-hand embarrassed watching people wreck her almost...and joy, lots of joy.
Emma openly advocating pedophilia was shocking.
I'm shocked, shocked! Well, not that shocked.
Not that shocking to me honestly
Not to me. These leftards love pedophelia
Why would you be? The UN's newest "guidelines" for prosecuting sex crimes encourages people to NOT consider ages of victims and perpetrators.
Our governments are compromised by sex weirdos. So it isn't too crazy that some people are starting to demand to be allowed to molest children openly.
She didn't advocate shit.
"Crime is driven by poverty" Yet we never see these criminals stealing food only luxury goods and pharmacy products
They are in desperate need of luxury items lol
They can sell those
I'm not a leftoid but this is a terrible argument
Alladins
I’ve never had a PPA where the thief was stealing bread and diapers.
@hoominbeeing Yet, they tend to wear those luxury items more often than not. Blame hip hop for promoting brand name obsession.
@@hoominbeeing I shouldn't have to tell you what they use pharmaceutical products for either.
Did anybody else get the "wanna be cool, but utterly clueless" vibe from Emma? Seriously it was like watching the girls from High School that desperately wanted to be in the "cool group", but would constantly say "I don't care" when learning they weren't invited. After the debate on Tim Cast, I actually felt sorry for Emma. She was so clueless it was almost sad.
Nah man, She's not clueless she's a liar. We gotta call this sophist nonsense out.
@@specimenlarry6068
I dont think shes a liar
I think her brain legitimately doesnt compute that shes being dishonest
Double think at its finest
@TOAOM123
I find this moment egregious.
43:03 pure slanderous smear lie
And at 39:49, it's just a pure lie
@@specimenlarry6068 She's a good mix of being clueless and a liar. I doubt she would have responded with saying "that's a great book" when referring to a ped.0philia propaganda book. She would have came up with a better strategy if she wasn't clueless from the start.
She's a liar, she's only starting her career, he'd be all over klaus schw4b's ass as soon as she can.
Emma got completely destroyed but she was too stupid to understand it.
When I’m losing an argument, I just accuse the other person of being any of the many hate groups…what a ridiculous woman…
Many of the leftists spats go like this. They take turn to paint the other as inexcusable-ist and getting offended by how can the other have the gall to accuse saint me of anything. The only who is less ruthless and lets any of the words get into him looses the argument.
What do you expect? 1 in a hundred women are capable of doing their reasoning through logic instead of emotion, and Emma is, for once in her pampered life, in the 99%.
Where do you get that 1/100 figure? I agree that women are worse on this than men but that seems a little extreme lol.
This is why conservatives destroy the left when they debate because we are forced to support our arguments while they can just name call and other underhanded tactics
@@nickcollins9170 not when it’s these far left women who spew garbage on leftist media
She reminded me of a sleazy politician that never directly answers a question, deflects when faced with things she had nothing to counter with and heavily resorted to broad talking points about policies while avoiding specifically stating how to implement those policies in the real world.
She a corpo-fem
You clearly only watched the highly edited version actual social justice put up
@@frank-vt8yf no I watched the whole thing on Tim's channel.
Your comment proves you didn't even watch the entire show and only watched the heavy edited version the right wing channels are puting out
@@alwaysonit4660 nauh,she really didn't. Just because somebody talks louder and over somebody doesn't make them smarter.
When you said "I would like judges to have judgement, yes." I almost died. 😂😂😂
Sean, you represented yourself well. Good job
Sean, don't think you are not a nice person. She was completely unprepared and arrogant. Being firm is an okay thing.
Yeah, I don’t think he was being mean. Overall, he was quite polite if not firm.
Being kind to morons while they lie to our faces is what got us into this situation.
@@laurendearnley9595Agree!!
@@laurendearnley9595 I see what you mean, but I don’t think being kind is being a pushover necessarily. We can treat people with basic respect and still speak out against the foolishness.
@@Blakmagic88 at some point though, you really have to call them out on their stupidity and arrogance. However, these days, with massive egos in people like Emma, I doubt any of it would get through her head
I like how she pretends to care about "people dying" in Rikers Island, when more people are dying in the streets from violent criminals not being afraid of arrest, or being released immediately after booking.
You can tell that she has never experienced and doesn't know anyone who has experienced anything remotely close to being the victim of a violent crime or theft.
They care more about the criminals than the victims. Truly authoritarian. Those with power deserved to do everything to conserve that power.
@@BonzoForLyfe It's funny how a small taste of reality makes these lying morons realize how the world isn't ran on gum drops and rainbows. Ana Kasparian is still a lunatic, but after getting a taste of what the ideology she and the rest of TYT were/are pushing about how "criminals are victims and you're just privileged if you cry about being robbed", funny how that tune changed, what? Immediately after? SUDDENLY we need "arrest criminals and homeless people can't shitpiss wherever they want".
The narrow view of the world that these cultists have is BY FAR the worst I've ever heard of anywhere in the world at any time.
Conservatism propaganda
How so?
That whole dying in prison and no cash bail was just a giant, incoherent mess of garbage.
1. People dying in Rikers doesn't necessarily mean they're dying BECAUSE they're in Rikers. Emma never established this connection.
2. There is absolutely no case or civil law that states holding someone in jail while awaiting charges in itself is cruel and unusual punishment. (Bonus points for not getting the correct amendment.)
3. Reforming the jail system or Rikers doesn't mean you have to not hold anyone in jail until they're convicted. You can just fix the jail.
4. Not every jail is Rikers or as messed up as Rikers. See above.
5. Yes, judges should be empowered with JUDGMENT to allow the release of the guy who's never been arrested for shoplifting as opposed to holding the guy who was arrested for shoplifting (or some other crime) three days ago until trial.
6. Since there is a small portion of the population in New York committing all these retail thefts repeatedly, we should let them out of jail pending trial because reasons?
What an absolutely terrible performance on her part. I can't wait until her beta co-host gets demolished by Sean. Hopefully this time there will be no third wheel for Sam to repeatedly defer to to derail the debate.
You came in with facts, statistics and logic. She came in buzzwords, a smug attitude and a complete unwillingness to meaningfully discuss anything that wasn't going exactly her way. She hasn't meaningfully debated anyone outside her echo chamber and it shows. this wasn't a debate it was the roast of emma vigeland.
I currently work in retail (craft store right now) and witnessed shoplifting for the first time in my life. A woman with a massive, empty purse walks into the store and I greet her. She totally ignores me and walks to the back of the store, where we have knitting/crochet and fine art supplies. I don't see her for probably 15 minutes to half an hour. A couple of the managers come up to the front of the store to talk about manager stuff, and the lady comes back up to the front and walks right out of the door (I tried to greet her again and she completely ignored me). This time, her purse was absolutely bulging with shit that she stole. The managers both caught sight of her purse and knew that it was empty when she got here. For the next couple of days, we found what she had stolen. Two entire rows of chalk markers (not cheap), tons of knitting needles that she just took out of the packages and left locked on the hooks, pens... all sorts of really expensive stuff that I can guarantee she didn't need to survive. People don't steal shit because they're desperate, they steal shit because they don't feel like paying for it. I could have understood her stealing food or diapers or other things like that, still would have disagreed with it and would have loved to see her in jail for theft, but stealing from a craft store has no justification. You can't eat chalk markers or knitting needles. You can't take care of a child with pens.
Emma and people like her are free to donate directly to the store that I work at in order to offset the poor little thief that stole a few hundred dollars' worth of stuff's damage. The thief was black too, so they'd be doing a great service to the black community by paying for the damage that she caused.
Her idea that crime is driven by poverty is classist. Poor people aren't all thieves, even when they're desperate.
Don't forget that the cities with all the crime are the most wealthy ones in the nation.... Towns that are almost entirely made up of "poor" people don't have gang members flagged up and walking down the street looking for fights...
Stats showing high crime and high poverty areas, make it clear that crime causes poverty, and not the other way around.
The issue isn’t pøverty, it’s cułture. I looked up the following information last year, so likely there will be some changes.
Most Dangerous/Víolent Cities (US):
1. Detroit, MI
2. Memphis, TN
3. Birmingham, AL
4. Baltimore, MD
5. St. Louis, MO
6. Kansas City, MO
7. Cleveland, OH
8. Little Rock, AR
9. Milwaukee, WI
10. Stockton, CA
How about poorest cities:
1. Memphis, Tennessee 42.3%
2. Detroit, Michigan 36.1%
3. Baltimore, Maryland 34.1%
4. Miami, Florida 31.7%
5. Fresno, California 31.5%
6. Buffalo, New York 30.9%
7. Newark, New Jersey 30.4%
8. Toledo, Ohio 30.1%
9. Milwaukee, Wisconsin 29.9%
10. St. Louis, Missouri 29.2%
So if the poorest aren’t always the most dangerous, what are the demographics of the most dangerous:
1. Detroit - Black or African American: 78.33% White: 14.70% Other race: 3.06% Two or more races: 1.84%
2. Memphis - Black or African American: 64.11% White: 29.23% Other race: 3.28% Asian: 1.72%
3. Birmingham- Black or African American: 69.85% White: 25.81% Two or more races: 1.49% Other race: 1.45%
4. Baltimore - Black or African American: 62.35% White: 30.46% Asian: 2.58% Two or more races: 2.49%
5. St Louis - Black or African American: 44.9%, White: 44.5%, Asian: 3.44%, Two+: 2.54%
6. Kansas City - White: 60.90% Black or African American: 28.21% Other race: 4.00% Two or more races: 3.58%
(Note: Look at that KC broke the trend, let’s look at the most dangerous neighborhoods. Washington Wheatley is the most dangerous and it is Black or African American: 75.9%, White: 13.3%, Two+: 6%, Asian: 1.9%, Other : 3%
7. Cleveland - African American: 48.8%, White: 40%, Two+: 4.4%, Asian: 2.6%. Other: 4.2%
8. Little Rock - White: 50.29% Black or African American: 42.04% Asian: 3.30% Two or more races: 2.25%
(Note: we have another apparent trend breaker, what’s the most dangerous neighborhoods? South End is the most dangerous and it is Black or African American: 90.1%, White: 3.4%, Two+: 3%, Other: 3.5%… Looks like the trend isn’t broken after all).
9. Milwaukee - White: 44.35% Black or African American: 38.75% Other race: 7.98% Asian: 4.26%
(Note: Most dangerous neighborhoods? Metcalfe Park is the most dangerous and it is Black or African American: 86%, White: 3%, Asian: 8%, Two+: 3%… Trend still intact).
10. Stockton - White: 45%, Asian: 22%, Two +: 12%, Black or African American: (What’s the most dangerous neighborhoods? Too many different neighborhoods came up without an agreement on just one… So does this break the trend? It does if you think this is only about race but it doesn’t if you realize it’s about culture. A culture can cross racíal lines, while still being predominant in one).
According to her logic, nuns who take a vow of poverty would be hardened criminals.
Criminality drives crime she's no clue.
Emma would like you to simultaneously believe that criminals pose no threat to society and shouldn't be held before trial, but also the place they're held before trial is one of the most dangerous places in the country.
It was a wink and a nod to cops being the perps in all of these cases because her tribe wants us all to believe they're just hunting 🙎🏿♂️ and the corrections officers are cops in her world. She knows her side won't bother to look into it and even if they find its other inmates doing this stuff then it'll still be the corrections officers fault for various reasons.
Also she would not like to live in high crime neighborhoods
It's the guards who are dangerous, not the people being held 😂
I think jail can be dangerous and reform can be done without leaving more dangerous criminals out on bail in the meantime
@@ID-ee9hzidk fam, I was in court recently. Zoom. So I was able to listen to other people’s charges. All the people being held in county awaiting trial were for armed robbery, domestic abuse, shooting people, etc. not one was there for anything non violent.
She likes to move the goalpost
Your face the entire time she was re-directing was actually hilarious. First time I saw your mediation between Tim and Emma was also funny. You looked like you were just happy to be along for the ride there. Good work as always.
What a CEO makes a year doesn’t force people to shoplift. That’s insane for her to say that.
BUT CORPORATE PROFITS THOUGH NUH-UH. I hate the lack of analysis from people that propose to be experts. Sean researches and uses comparative analysis, the bare minimum could prove his points, and yet people like Emma act like it's foreign science and mental acrobatics.
I made about 38k last year. The income inequality between me and CEOs is in the millions. But would you look at that, I still paid for my Chopani.
If the CEOs and boards of directors all got paid nothing, their employees would make a few hundred dollars a year extra. A full time worker would get paid less than half an extra paycheck
It’s a great excuse for criminals
Yep. Income inequality is a problem, but it doesn’t make sense that it drives crime. CEOs being rich doesn’t provide less products at higher prices. And how much money people have doesn’t change poverty, the only thing that changes that is having MORE THINGS at CHEAPER prices. So I hope she’s not an environmentalist, because lifting people out of poverty is ONLY about making more and more stuff for them so the prices drop, deregulating so products can be made easier, razing natural land to build more housing, etc.
If Emma's house was broken into and robbed by the same person over and over she'd want that person in jail.
Flash news the answer of why people keep doing crime is because the system continues to punish them! The answer is not being more facist and send them to prison but rather deal with the material condition of the people
All they have to say is they are poor and deserve her things I'm sure she'll understand
She'd want them killed, I'd bet.
@@homesteadorbustyeah that really bothers me about leftists. To them, poor people are all just criminals. I grew up poor in the projects and my single mom has never stole anything. She worked crap jobs and missed tons of time with us in order to get off welfare and eventually into college so she could get a better job. We went without a lot of things. Not once did my mom ever go steal nikes and hair extensions to get us things or pay the bills.
@@homesteadorbust if that is the impression that you got from her than you cemetery miss the point that she is making.
Tim and others: Crime is going up.
Emma: That's because of poverty.
Tim: Why are more people being pushed in front of trains?
Emma: I don't know dude.
Wh....what? You just gave an answer to the same kind of question and have no answer not 5 seconds later! Things like this help lead to the idea that people like Emma are just trying to disagree with people like Tim and Sean. You want to prove you aren't an NPC? JUST THINK! Use your head and stop following the party line.
Great conversation Sean and i appreciate your hard work, understanding and covering all the details. Thank you.
She straight up didn't want to engage Sean because she knew she was just spouting talking points with surface level research. Sean wasn't having any of her little leftist weasel tricks of evoking racism or reframing and it was obvious she knew she could not hold a light to Sean so she kept engaging Tim thinking he would be more her match AND EVEN TIM DUNKED ON HER. God everytime i see progressives engage people with actual arguments it makes me hate them even more because they have such conviction and a hollier than thou attitude when they are absolutely winging it.
Just like the Christians of old. Also what is up with all these accounts with a name and a number?
Highly sus
@@Max_OhmIt's UA-cam's new feature where you have handles now
If you want it changed you have to do it manually
@@Max_Ohmand there it is. Because you can't argue the point attack religion because it's too easy. Pathetic
She didn't consciously know she had a shallow and heavilly inaccurate understanding. She was just maneuvering through an adversarial engagement as far as her actions indicate.
6:00 "Poverty leads to crime." Wrong. No one thinks, "I'm so poor, guess I'll go shoot up a school or maybe shove some folks onto the subway tracks." The *stealing bread because I'm starving* trope is a myth. If it ever happens, it's such a low % of crime it's practically immeasurable. Next time I see police break up a fight at a party I'm going to ask which one was starving. Poverty and crime are both downstream to low intellect and low impulse control. There just aren't a lot of brainiacs out there robbing liquor stores for $100 risking 10 yrs in prison.
And when you break down crime by homicide they can no longer associate it with poverty because we all know that isn't the case.
Yes and no.
Evil is a choice, Marxists are right to call out rich and powerful people as criminals because many times they are.
It just completely invalidates their argument that poverty creates criminals because then these rich people wouldn’t steal would they.
Btw many criminals con-artists, corrupt criminals, and crime bosses have relatively high IQs.
Part of the problem is...they're never asking, or talking to either the people in law enforcement because they don't like or trust them...and they're not talking to people in asset protection, either. Not only that, they're not talking to the people actually stealing. Some people do it because they feel they have to, but a lot of others are doing it as a job, pretty much.
That's what this is all about the majority of people that do this aren't white so people like Emma think they are protecting them
That's not what it means to say "poverty causes crime." You are strawmanning.
It’s easy to show low violent crime numbers when you don’t arrest or prosecute them anymore. That’s how they do it not to mention cook the books and emit Certain facts that don’t fit their worldview.
loved your input in both of Tim's shows. Great job, keep it up and lets get you to a million.
I literally spit my drink out when she made the comment about people only shoplifting due to finances.
that explains why rich people also shoplift.
Make up, electronics and fashion are some of the most commonly shoplifted items
@@ncyikcvjxiw8936 because those are big money items, it's about easy money (not necessity). Get a real job? Yeah, no way, that's for suckers am-I-right?
@@bighomiestevethemetalheadhow about you stop being facist and recognize that poverty leads to crimes. More cops doesn't solve a dammed thing. The reason that the high rate of crime occurs is because we continue to punish people even after they serve their time. But facist like yourself can't understand why that is and than don't understand why neo-nazi loves conservative content.
@@bighomiestevethemetalheadI don't understand your 'get a real job?" question. Can you explain why this is a question.
I could barely watch, the amount of bad faith from her was extremely disheartening.
Not disheartening. Disgusting.
She looks like a female version of the singer from Anberlin
imagine being such a fanboi of tim pool lol cry more
@@A-Jeffcope lol
@@A-Jeff Her being intellectually dishonest is irrelevant to Tim. She made bad faith arguments, performed confirmation bias, and doesn't care if she is wrong or committing slander.
Emma lost every single argument in that entire 2 hours. It’s impressive how much of a walking L she is💀
LOL Sweet profile pic!!
@@stephenhood2948Thanks! Yours is… just okay, I guess.
@@JoeBidenIsMyDaddy Yeah, I def need to woke on my profile pic game. LOL
Emma picked apart every argument the conservatives made, regardless of there being several conservatives in AJW’s team, he still got nuked. Cope
@@aln5832 In what way lmfao? Give me specific examples of her debunking their arguments. AJW made a recap video proving himself 100% correct lmfao. She lost literally every argument and then desperately pivoted away to another topic every time she realized she lost. You majority report fans are genuinely delusional😂
What's scary is that people still defend her.
Emma was remarkably stupid. I had very low expectations, considering her political leanings, but she still surprised me with how she couldn't back a single thing she said up with factual evidence.
Funny thing, but when you stop arresting and prosecuting criminals, the reported crime stats might be less. It doesn't mean there's actually less crime.
Yes, exactly. All the shop owners know nothing will be done with the shoplifters, so they don’t even bother calling the police. And look at Lululemon, which forbid their employees from calling the police.
🎯 Bingo
Yep, funny that
Yep.
It’s like a school saying that they didn’t have to put anyone in detention. It doesn’t mean everyone was well behaved.
When you don't prosecute crimes, crime reporting goes down smh
Keep fighting the good fight, Sean. We appreciate everything you do.
Emma debates the same way most libs do these days, no facts in broad context, change the argument, until finally you get back to race. Seeing Emma get hit with the wrecking ball of reality was priceless.
It's why she got so mad every time Tim or Sean wanted to be specific.
@@bradmiles1984 It is hard to debate with people who always go "But that is just one example. Listen instead to my ideals and concepts!"
The least she could do is thank them for the examples, and then present her own counter example.
@@linusgustafsson2629 Well that would be actual debate not trying to clip farm on her side.
And with that stupid smug smirk every time she thinks she had a gotcha lol
*Leftists
It's so interesting to watch people like this talk about "destroying Republicans" and how much smarter they are than everyone who disagrees with them yet they absolutely flounder when they try to defend their positions at even a base level.
And then they post a clip of the floundering to reddit and say they destroyed whoever they were debating.
It's incredible to see. But people will just believe it.
They're morons.
@@getthegoonsI was looking on Reddit & saw this exact thing. A lot "Emma absolutely destroyed Tim!" With no context as to how she "destroyed" him. Just that she did... somehow. On one thread I even saw someone referring to AJW as "random frat bro" posting proof that the "Hispanic neo-nazi" watched Tim. It was a quick grab & edit of Tim saying he didn't watch my show. Then just the part of Sean saying "I checked, he posted 4 clips." To make it seem as if Sean were correcting Tim.
“It’s because I’m white.“
“Yeah, that’s nice…“
💀💀💀
She's Jewish
It’s so funny how she kept looking around, like she was looking for somebody to agree with her😅
"The greatest crimes issue from a desire for excess and not from necessity" - Aristotle
Emma is pretty much wrong about everything she likes to talk about.
Such a great quote. Every tyrannical political schemer does this when they're already comfortably wealthy
That is also why true socialism or communism won't work.
Someone is going to want more and be willing to do whatever it takes to get it.
hmmm i wonder how it's explained that more crime statistically is committed in low income areas, aka poverty stricken parts of a city. that's just basic data anyone can look up.
@@Janzer_ plenty of poor people don't kill other people
@@Janzer_ Crime destroys wealth (think about how, for example, stolen good sell for less money than new, or even used goods. Stores close down when shoplifting is too much to bear, and even if they don't, prices have to be higher to compensate for the stolen merchandise, etc.), so high crime areas become areas with only poverty.
That said, poverty is the normal state in nature, so only productive activity and trade can alleviate poverty - both of which are harder with higher crime.
Imagine someone arguing that rape is driven by poverty lmao "you see judge I couldn't pay for dinner so... you know" man that would be entertaining to watch.
the rapist was hungry... for non-food things.
@@RoseNZieg Too many rapists are poor in the sexual market, so they turn to crime to make up the difference. Surely as a woman she understands that some people aren't as privileged as her and are just seizing the means of reproduction.
awesome video as always, great to see you on with sitch and adam with brianna as well. Back to back bangers, keep it up
Was waiting for this video.
It was nice to see Sean on the show to moderate this debate 😂
Emma was totally avoiding debating Sean. She had a hard on for Tim cause Tim "slandered" her boyfriend.
I assume you saw the original video. And because you saw it and are a commenter, saw the fact that a lot of people said exactly the same thing. Thank you for contributing nothing to the conversation and for being annoying.
@@justliving920shut up. Engagement drives this platform. Adding the same comment is still a net benefit for Mr. Fitzgerald
@@Noodlepunk cope Emma destroyed ajw multiple times, watch the sam seder segment and stop being uneducated please
@@A-Jeffyikes it's an antifa guy, he's here to burn down a building or something else as stupid as these "people" like to do.
“So they’re stealing just for fun”
Uh, yeah. That, and because they can. Stealing, probably 75% of the time, is due to opportunity not because of need.
I've had arguments with people who genuinely believed Emma Vigeland steamrolled both Sean and Tim and I am absolutely convinced these people are delusional
"They're desperate"
Yeah, desperate people steal $100 pairs of shorts from Lulu Lemon (however it's spelled). We're not talking about people stealing bread, lady.
She's insufferable. You have the patience of a saint.
She’s kinda hot. She’s probably been getting away with being this insufferable due to that her whole life.
He has the patience of a Saint unless you try to exercise your 2nd amendment. Then he turns into every other New Yorker petty tyrant
@@cargopilotguy305 Timmy boy is very pro gun rights what you talking about?
@@BlookbugIV 32:57-35:30 Sean. Sean is the anti-2A liar.
@@cargopilotguy305 sorry dude I thought this was a thread on a Tim video. I just got a bunch of replies from Tim videos, wasn’t paying attention. Didn’t know that about Sean.
People do have a US Constitutional right to a speedy trial. You know who typically delays the case as much as humanly possible? The Defendants.
defendants don't typically delay as much as possible unless they're very guilty in order to delay conviction. they typically delay enough to make a good case. you have to remember that the prosecution has had months/years of investigation before they bring a case. the defense has to catch up. in the very beginning, the prosecution wants to rush things because it means the defense is not prepared. after the defense prepares, the prosecution wants to delay as much as possible (oops, we just found some more evidence! here's 100,000 pages of additional discovery) to increase costs for the defendant and coerce a settlement.
@@justhecuke I could see that happening in select instances, but then the Defendant really is supposed to have the power to get the case kicked for Constitutional reasons.
Fuck no. The state
@@justhecuke 95% don't go to trial anyway.
@@stanleyclark923 There was a TV show called "Shannon's Deal" who would say that trial is for amateurs. Pros should be able to cut a deal as both sides should know enough to know where to draw the lines ahead of time. Even for him, that didn't always happen.
She’s the Anna Kasperian of the majority report.
It was great! I loved seeing you and hearing you controls that conversation.
I wish you got to talk more on the show. You did really well
Only Tim is allowed to talk.
Alright though seriously when she tried to say that mass shooters like tim pool for a reason and he just started yelling at her i was laughing my ass off
thats the c*nts fault, she went there to say "im right you are wrong", which Tim could take, but the extent she went for, aint no way in hell Tim was not going to spend every single minute argumentatively sodomizing her.
@DastardlyVamp I feel more that Emma was voiding talking to Sean. She had a huge hard on for going after Tim for bad mouthing her boyfriend. 🙄
@@Noodlepunk "Nah, that sounds like what happened but I'm going to pretend it was Tim's fault."
Sam is going to pull a ton of your clips out of context, misquote you, and put words/positions in your mouth. Don’t just prepare based off of HIS clips, make sure to check out your own previous videos to quickly challenge his erroneous points.
“So, you previously stated that you’re ok with poverty and don’t understand why criminals need money for food. Let’s talk about that and how you’re a racist.”
-Probably Sam in the future
Comment for algo boost.
Great point.
A debate with Sam Sedar is almost impossible to win because you're forced to listen to him try to talk, something almost unbearable for most people. Every other word is ummm, ahhh, or some other gutteral noise. Insufferable. Sam talks for a living, or for a hobby, or for some other reason - maybe he's just sadistic - whatever... He expects people to listen to him...? Yikes.
This is why I don't bother watching these debates. At least one of the counterparts is a slimy character desperately angling for cheap "gotcha" moments
I'm at least glad that this nonsense introduced me to this UA-cam channel
@@kielfrank4528hah, thank you!
@@BoxOfOranges84AJW has some pretty solid content! He has a few debates with Destiny (a UA-camr on the left) that are pretty productive and respectful, if you’re looking for some debates that aren’t based in lunacy.
Okay now do a video on Emma's claim that right wing terrorism dwarfs left wing terrorism. I really wanted to hear her elaborate on that one.
We all know it's just based on cooked ADA "data" that classifies white-on-white killings as "right-wing hate crimes."
why would anyone shoplift if they have money?
tiktokers: hold my dasani
Ground shifting is such a sophist debate tactic. If you’re not able to respond to someone’s argument, you just shift to different argument then act as those they are the same. Emma seems to employ this tactic a lot.
Liberals often shift from one point to another when you have proven your point. They don’t want to confront the facts, so instead of refuting something, they bring up another point and you don’t realize until later that they never really gave a proper answer.
I'm glad you actually got to talk about this on Stich and Adam's show. The debate on Tim's show was more like you third wheeling with two exes with unresolved issues. Though when you did get to speak, you did great (even as a moderator)!
Emma had a huge rage boner for Tim cause he bad mouthed her boyfriend Sam.
At around 21:20, Emma confirms that she doesn't know what she's on about. Judges can be overturned by higher courts- this is what the appellate process is all about.
I tried to make it through this 😢 but she was impossible. It wasn't a debate, she would answer any point or question with "but did you know about this worse thing?" But thank you for trying, hopefully the viewers learned some new things.
And oh, if they stop arresting people, crime stats go down 🙄
How many of these brazen shoplifting sprees have we saw lately where they were taking food?? Id say 5%. They were so poor and hungry that the IPhones, TVs and Lululemon they stole are going to feed them?? I would have some sympathy for a starving person stealing food, the people we have saw of late are doing no such thing, and defending them with the "Oh they are just hungry" argument is only going to make this worse.
I hope Sean gets on Timcast IRL more often. It's nice to hear different opinions on the show and finding some policies or opinions the hosts can find common ground on.
Why, so that Tim won't let him get his thoughts out?
tim needs another man to defends his own political position lmao
Nope. Don't subject Sean to more of Tim's "Hosting".
@@A-Jeff Fair enough.
@@A-Jeff Not really he did a better job of it then Emma did of defending hers.
She’s the reason we have repeat offenders because it hurts feelings making you pay bail.
Cops: Mr. T-rex why did you eat that Triceratops?
Mr. T-rex: I was hungry, bro.
Viggles: Mr. T-rex ate the Triceratops because he didn't have single payer healthcare!!! 🦖🦕
It was the best episode of "culture war" ive seen. Sean, you did an awesome job
A gangster may have thousands of dollars in his pocket, and millions in the bank, yet continue to engage in criminality. Gangsta gonna gangsta…
Some researcher counted real earnings of drug traffickers. It was below what you make flipping burgers, with an even steeper inequality than a corporation. Mid level guys were making OK money but it was less than if they put that ambition and dedication into becoming mid level in any career. They also needed to spend a lot on frivolous stuff to stay respected, which meant no savings and less spending on what really matters. There has to be big cultural impact for this kind of end result, if it wasn't "cool" there'd be much fewer aspiring gangsters.
I left the left when I finally realized that they don’t live in reality. Of course people shoplift for fun. The most shoplifted items are in inessential items such as expensive clothes, tech, and jewelry. I know people who personally stole from stores because they simply didn’t want to pay, even though they could afford it. People like her need to wake tf and learn some common sense. We don’t always need stats to know why people do crime.
I've seen some TEDx talk where a leftists was "proving" how all crimes are crimes of passion (no they're not) and then that you can't affect emotions with fear of consequences (as if I'm just as likely to shoplift if its 100$ fine or 5 years in prison) so any kind of reason based crime prevention is useless. You can ONLY do ecological approach where you care for and give stuff to everyone who's having it rough, so eventually less people have bad days and the urge to do crimes. The room clapped.
Where my friend is from, he literally told me that shoplifting was a “rite of passage”
@@Peterusplwho did the talk ?
It aint just that baby products are good because of shelf life and mothers trying to get products cheap.
So its easy money.
People steal single use items because its a reocurring market.
Nappies are always needed.
Makeup
While jewels and tech are worth money, constant supply makes up more than enough.
Its litreally how dollar stores work.
They also have huge profit margins.
My brother stole some steaks from the local grocery store even though he got free meals at home and could afford it if he really wanted it.
Sam Seder actually deleted my comments on his piss poor attempt at a "PWNING" video where he selected the bits where Emma didn't sound as dumb as she actually is.
I was actually quite polite and just said that using deceptive and selective editing was his typical M.O.! He really hates being called out on that stuff!
Wow, that was a great interview! I thought you and Tim played off each other really well. I'm so glad you did this follow-up video to really nail some of these points down. Great job.
"I will win over the audiance because i am correct"
Sean, thats gold. Im gonna use that from time to time.
Louis Rossmann has repeatedly pointed out that, the reason why NY City's crime rate is "low" is because most crimes are not accounted for, because most crimes are not reported or recorded.
The NY cops tell people they don't want to take reports when it's not thousands of dollars of stuff stolen. And to be fair, I see their point... They know the shitty courts are going to just let them go and they'll have wasted their time, so why even bother?
Subbed after Timcast. I like your style and excited to see more!
Many of the crimes that have increased since 2020 are not financial crimes, like theft. So that kills her point right there
People who avoid hypotheticals are scared that there standards will be exposed as inconsistent and indefensible.
Not necessarily. Some hypotheticals are so outrageous and ridiculous that it's just used as a desperate "gotcha"
Emma is so unbelievably ridiculous, just up her own keester with a "SAVE THE MINORITIES" mindset.
ajw lies constantly and u never call him out.
@@A-Jeff
What did he lie about?
@@A-JeffI wish to be enlightened as well.
@@John.T. about george floyd for example, he said inaccurate things and didn't correct himself. maybe ur too blinded by hate that u cant see it ?
@@A-Jeff okay, but what did he lie about?
This video increased the crime rate in NY. "Hello officer, I'd like to report a murder."
I enjoyed the episode! I hope we get more debates!
"The desperation of the pandemic"
It's amazing how quickly the people screaming to defund the police forgot it ever happened....
It's more like """""forgot""""" it ever happened. haha
Also the same people who demanded the "pandemic" be a complete shutdown of the whole world and shamed anyone saying they were losing jobs and homes and needed to get back to work and stop worrying about such a weak illness 😂 they were even mad it didn't extend longer but refuse to own the responsibility for causing all this "desperation"
Was any department actually defunded?
@@falseprophet1024yep
The Majority Report has a video all about how Emma "humiliated" Tim but strangely they didn't show any video of said humiliation...
Lol rly?
Great recap!
The people I know who shoplifted the most were all upper middle class people who just didn’t want to pay.
Vigeland arguing with a straight face that NO ONE ever would shoplift for any reason other than "because poor" is mind blowing. Like, even if you ignore Sean's very cogent point about organized shop lifting being an opportunistic crime due to lax laws surrounding it, it's like she's literally never heard of kleptomania which leads to people stealing literally just because they have an impulse to. To claim that there can only ever be one single reason that people shoplift is just insane.
I used to be a heroin addict and i knew many who were the same that shoplifted all the time to get items they would sell for drugs. I'm white, if i were black Emma would excuse this behavior.
To be entirely fair to Emma Vigeland, you have to be an NPC to actually work with Sam Seder. And she fulfils that role very well.
wdym sam seder is a genius of comedy? i think u guys on the right are still triggered that he embarrassed ur e daddy steven chowder and dont get his sense of humor.
@@A-Jeff who? I don't know what you're talking about. You are talking about people who don't matter.
@@xyonblade u dont know who steven crowder is?...
@@A-Jeffhow can you embarrass someone you didn't debate. Also still defending that coward Ethan for hiding away behind someone else despite multiple times stating to his fans AND Steven that it was a one on one debate. But what do you expect from a scumbag who stole over 12 million dollars from his fans and bought a mansion lmao. Ethan and Sam deserve zero respect. And also, yes, despite your thinking that the world revolves around you, not everyone on the right will know about who you like and don't like. Welcome to reality, where being a sniveling lying little bastard isn't a good thing. I have zero doubt that of Steven had done the same thing people would've lost their shit. Steven still told Ethan after this over and over that he would still debate him of he stopped being a coward
@@A-Jeff The fact that you think he embarrassed anyone is cute. He tried to pull a fast one to get on a show where they declined him multiple times in the past because Sam acts like that. I'm not overly fond of Crowder but you should really up your troll game, it's pretty bad, like 10 year old intellect bad.
I hate this assumption that poverty causes crime. They're willing to tear down the dignity of the poor just so they can push their ideology. The problem is no one ever questions it because it feels intuitive - and some people get to have an excuse. Poor people are no more or less predisposed to committing crimes than any other demographic. The determining factor is culture, not privation.
Haven’t watched yet but super glad to see you back on Timcast. Hope it keeps happening!