I would keep Richard Hadlee on top because at that time, New Zealand cricket team was very weak as compared to Pakistan,India and England. He was kind of a lone warrior.
@@stephenmcloughlin7718 Procter was devastating in county, but didn't play enough tests to be considered better than Imran. Still better than modern all rounders tho
@@sayonbasak-x3w , they played together in Kerry Packers World Series Cricket. Procter averaged 10 more than Imran with the bat, a d 5 better than Imran with the ball. He has more 10 wickets in a match than Imran, more 5 wickets an innings, more centuries, more 50s. He has a world record 6 successive first class centuries, the only player in history to score a century and take a hatrick in the same game twice.
In my opinion imran is greatest all rounder than botham ,kapil,richard hardlee but what's your choice in these four please tell
I would keep Richard Hadlee on top because at that time, New Zealand cricket team was very weak as compared to Pakistan,India and England. He was kind of a lone warrior.
Mike Procter was better than Imran, Botham, Kapil Dev and Hadlee
@@stephenmcloughlin7718 Procter was devastating in county, but didn't play enough tests to be considered better than Imran. Still better than modern all rounders tho
@@sayonbasak-x3w , they played together in Kerry Packers World Series Cricket. Procter averaged 10 more than Imran with the bat, a d 5 better than Imran with the ball. He has more 10 wickets in a match than Imran, more 5 wickets an innings, more centuries, more 50s. He has a world record 6 successive first class centuries, the only player in history to score a century and take a hatrick in the same game twice.