California Police Shoot Allegedly Drunk Man Wielding Tow Hitch
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 вер 2024
- The Modesto Police Department in California released bodycam footage of Officers Sam Munsey and Sergio Valencia shooting Paul Chavez Jr., who was allegedly drunk and wielding a tow hitch on July 14. Chavez died at a local hospital. The footage was released after his family announced legal action.
#Police #Bodycam #LawAndCrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on UA-camTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandC...
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.co...
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK UA-cam CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam
As a 20 yr veteran cop who was also a SWAT Operator and Defensive Tactics Instructor, all I can say is this was a very bad shoot. The guy was obviously drunk and could have been taken down easily, even with the tow hitch in his hand. He probably wouldnt have even noticed if one of the officers came up behind him. Not to mention they have pepper spray and batons which could have been utilized. I dont know if it is fear, lack of training, these days or even just looking for justification to shoot someone. But these kinds of incidents is what fosters a lack of trust of law enforcement and even hatred.
One of the biggest problems that happened in CA in the 90's was how police departments were so terrified of lawsuits that they started firing officers over the tiniest policy violations. They went overboard with the internal investigations following Rodney King in order to show the public that they weren't covering for their own. The problem was that when they did that it backfired. Basically when you immediately fire the officer for any violation, however slight, you are basically admitting that your employee did something wrong. This bites you in the a** when it goes to civil court in a lawsuit. So they learned the hard way (financially) that it was not the way to proceed. So what you have now is that no matter how egregious an officer involved shooting is (even when caught on video), they department will announce that they back the officer's actions and find that he did nothing wrong.
Hit the nail on the head. One guy with pc of steel, three guys w/all kinds of stuff. I HATE seeing this crap!
Very well said.
As a former LEO myself, I echo your comments Sir. It’s a sad state of affairs
killed a father, brother, step dad, uncle, a person who probably could or was a leader of someone who looked up to them. All over a bad day and too much alcohol. How wonderful it is for cops to show up and shoot like its a shooting range. Don't be surprised when the same course of action is taken out on you guys and you end up in body bags.
I agree with bad shoot. But civil suit? LOL these cops rely on qualified immunity. And to be honest, why wouldn't they? You can shoot pesky citizens you're protecting and serving the f*ck out of all day long and not be held accountable for it.
It's a good gig if you can get it.
21 ft rule with a blunt instrument that cannot possibly cut arteries? Yeah, seems legit.
It's interesting how the caller acted at first like it was just "some guy" at his door and not his son-in-law. I think there is more to this story than we are hearing.
Always is
@@GeorgiaNFA ALWAYS INDEED !
The caller may consider not calling the police next time now that he has learned that calling them only made the situation worse.
He was ready to shoot him
@@alanh2116 The point is the caller may have done that on purpose intentionally
Is it me, or is 911 protocol sometimes utterly infuriating and ridiculously time consuming?
I just skip to the action. You know it's bad when they blur out dude before they even shoot him.
what do u mean ?
They would already be on the way even with the 911 operator on the phone with the caller. They would be updating police as they drive
It's all a part of the gathering of information. Police are dispatched immediately but 911 begins the process of gathering as much info as possible for them so that they are more informed when they arrive on scene.
Right like why would they want the full story and description or if has weapons..the people calling 911 are usually useless
call the police and tell them you are in fear of your life from a family member and then see how it ends up when your family member has a weapon and refuses to stop; what do people expect?
Little quick on the trigger there for someone carrying a tow hitch. I've seen cops wait longer to shoot someone whom they suspected of carrying a gun. Crappy situation all around.
what do you think would happen if that trailer hitch connects with a guys head?
Key word "suspected"
im going to become a cop so i can shoot people, got to love this country not accountability if your a cop
Well the taser was working and the suspect could flee so they put 2 rounds into him
We watched a city full of cops not kill a school shoot this fast
if that was you or me who shot that drunk guy, we would be sitting in jail for murder
Legal murder with a badge, yes.
What should they have done leave? And if he strikes and kills or injure someone, the police still get blamed, the dude brought that on himself
I really hope that this cop will face murder charges
Bingo
@@notyourtypicalcomment2399 it's really too bad that we live in a world where cops only have two options, kill or leave.
California really should rewrite their laws and allow police more time to wait on a drunk who isn't actively attacking them instead of saying all calls must be resolved in under 3 minutes.
One of the few videos on here where I say unjustified shooting.
It reminds me of the cop who shot the drunk guy in the hotel who couldn't waddle on his knees appropriately. That cop fled to The Philippines and has evaded all justice.
@@hopeseekr Didn't he get found not guilty? I don't think that's true.
@@hopeseekr it reminds me of the cop that shot a guy 7 times in the back who had a pocket knife and was going 2 mph in a mobility scooter. They were too quick to shot on this one.
Weapon and approaching officers after caller said he was breaking in and caller was gonna shoot him.
@@BudsCartoon He was actually walking away from officers before they got in front of him and he stopped and was just standing there. Go to the eye doctor.
No effort to de escalate the situation. That was murder
i guess police only choose to stay back and not shoot when there's a mass shooter like in Uvalde. But a random drunk guy in his backyard is enough to do it.
Pro tip for any criminal: put children in danger and the police will be sure to value themselves over the innocent lives and let you cause as much damage as you want.
@Aluzky So you believe our only two choices are useless cops or trigger happy cops? SMH
true dat. Because they afraid to die in the line of duty to acutally protect.
@Aluzky It's not obvious because that is arguably the majority of cops yet you failed to mention them in your previous comment. I guess you are not as smooth brained as your first comment made you seem.
“Wielding” or holding? It’s not a weapon and he wasn’t brandishing it. Unjustified shooting.
To be fair, a tow hitch is a blunt object, and can be used as weapon the same way a bike lock can. But in this case, he didn't pose a threat, so I agree with you on the terms of unjustified shooting.
@@seancombs1188 he was uncooperative. Had an item he'd threaten someone with. He was dangerous. If they had waited a little longer and had he ran towards a home, neighbor, or an officer. It's totally justified. This was too quick but never assume someone is not a threat because of their appearance. Ever. Cops shouldn't operate that way in my opinion. They need to be vigilant and cool headed.
@@KhamTVinc While I agree with you that cops need to be ever-vigilant (ESPECIALLY nowadays), there was no need to shoot the man in my opinion. To be honest, this video is muddied with grey area, since they fired the taser to no effect, and only had live rounds left as their only means of defense. However the man wasn't near anyone else, and didn't seem to have any intent (or ability, based on his stumbling) to charge them effectively. My opinion doesn't really mean much though since I wasn't there, and don't know how I would've reacted in the same situation.
@@seancombs1188 he was high out of his wits and didn't comply with orders. the taser didn't faze him so the only way to put him on (in this case "in") the ground was bullets.. even then it took a while before he dropped.
@@seancombs1188 oh for sure he didn't need to be shot. The prerequisites for that reaction weren't all there. That is what I meant by it happened too quick.
That was completely unnecessary and the cop definitely should NOT have shot the guy
The guy didn’t run at the cop or try to attack, unjustified shooting
No - he was just heading to the door of a house he did not live in and to the person he previously threatened to kill. Get a clue.
20’ rule applies here
@@The1Highland3r watch the video again. He was very slowly walking towards the officer, not the home. You're wrong and this shooting was not justified.
@@The1Highland3r u are clueless
He didn't comply, he should've complied.
This is MURDER BY COP.
CHARGE THEM.
There was NO THREAT. NO IMMINENT THREAT. There had BEEN NO THREATS.
Cops are not permitted to just kill people who disregard their orders.
I'm crying here.
Yeah I agree with you for sure on this one. I think many cop killings are justified but this one was CLEARLY UNjustified! The man is allowed to be carrying a hitch. The man is allowed to walk. He was in NO way acting as if he was going to hurt any of the cops. His last words before getting shot by them was "its okay". There were no sudden movements by him or anything. They literally shot him after telling him a few times to drop the hitch. That's murder. Just because you are a cop doesn't mean you can shoot someone after they fail to cooperate with your orders. That's NOT a license to kill. The cop who did this is just a pathetic murderer with a badge and a disgrace to humanity.
Yeah, brother got shot?
911 operator: (questions she missed)
what's his mother's maiden name?
What's his blood type?
What high school did he go to? Did he graduate?
Does he have any pets, if so, what are they?"
In the meantime, she hasn't put the call in putting everyone in danger! What a buffoon!
You forgot "How many facebook friends does he have?" While this is actually a pretty funny comment, I think they ask all those random questions to try and distract the caller a little since he said he was thinking about shooting the guy. She a very tiny window into the situation and since the caller sounds relatively safe, she is probably just trying to distract him from engaging the drunk guy until the cops show up (just a guess, I could be wrong). Unlucky this cop showed up. I generally err on the side of giving the cops the benefit of the doubt, but this one is pretty bad. I don't want that guy to show up if I call, yikies. At the very least his cop career should be over. Poor judgement.
Dispatchers are notorious for asking questions that were just answered by the caller! THERES A GUY WITH A GUN OUTSIDE MY HOUSE. Ok so youre saying theres a man outside sir? YES.. ok and does he have any weapons on him? YESSSS!!!! Jesus.
Omg, I hope those aren't protocol questions. Someone would get hury while answering questons. I have questions.n
Oh you forget the question what's his zodiac sign and what's yours?
What do you mean she "hasn't put the call in?"
This is exactly why you should never call the police on your loved ones who are acting crazy or being aggressive. All you had to do is defend yourself and probably use a taser and pepper spray to subdue your loved ones.
How was that slow moving man a threat? Back in the day cops would've tackled the guy and had him in cuffs no death needed.
Back in the day? Lol I just saw a recent video of officers tackling down a violent individual. Don’t let one video convince you that something isn’t the same anymore like “back in the days”.
bruh he has a weapon and wouldn’t comply wtf are they supposed to do
There is an attack on masculinity. Anybody who questions authority is to be taken out of the gene pool. I wish people saw these signs for what they are.
@@elijahluke5233 The weapon was down by his side. They shoulda done what he suggested,......tackle the drunk guy.
@Elijah
Not commit murder would be a good place to start
In this case, I didn’t see the dude being aggressive to have warranted to fired 2 rounds at him.
Yeah except for ignoring lawful commands to drop a lethal weapon and ripping the taser cords out of his chest. Other than that totally unagrressive. Oh and if you count the death threats against his family that made them call the cops in the first place, but other than that a real gentleman napping on the neighbors grass minding his own business carrying a trailer hitch for no reason.
@@rmsg7504 he looked confused. You’re a psychopath.
@@rmsg7504 And what's to say that story is 100% true? That's part of why they are there, to find out what is happening, from the accused and the accuser. You don't know the facts, I don't know the facts, we just have the video. Going off of what I see in the video, no reason to escalate to lethal force. I've seen cops take a lead pipe to the face and still take down the criminal without lethal force.
@@DudeMcGuybro Gather around the fire everyone and put on your tinfoil hats, its a conspiracy now. The whole thing was a setup..... Lame. Actually if you watch the video all the facts are right there so we BOTH are witness to the facts. Both visually and auditory. IF you don't want to accept that facts or you disagree that's fine, but they are there that is why the police released the badge cam video so people can see what exactly happened. It doesn't get more clear cut than this. CCTV and 2 badge cams with audio.
Wait they actually shot this guy? This is just not right man, I'm sorry. I usually am on the cop's side, but this is just murder in my opinion.
The guy brought it on himself
What are you on about? They gave him clear commands to drop the tow hitch multiple times and he didn’t listen, 2 seconds for him to run at the officers and strike them in the head
Agreed... could have taken him down with their billy clubs
Follow commands and you won't get shot, good job officers
@@notyourtypicalcomment2399 thats for a jury to decide
The police shot him pretty quick. I understand that he was drunk but they didn't try to talk him down or anything. I know the taser didn't work, so they immediately went to shooting him. I normally support the police but not on this one.
I agree with you on this, but let's be realistic here . We are nothing but a bag of choices , he made a choice that day of drinking and causing commotion , and the cop made the choice to shoot .
Aint gun culture grand?
This was one unjustified shoot if I've ever seen one. Cop should be in a cell. Period. This is just wrong
He was advancing at officers with a weapon. He may not have been running at them full force, but he was tased and when it didn't work he picked up speed and continued to advance at them. Should they wait until he's swinging a solid steel pipe with a 5-10lb metal ball on it at their heads? Cops (and normal civilians) shouldn't have to wait until they are in mortal danger to defend themselves. This guy made the decision to get drunk , go out and get a weapon and threaten people with it. The consequences of his actions are on him.
@@AdoreYouInAshXI why copy and paste?
@@AdoreYouInAshXI you talk like advancing was him running at them. Let this happen to you with someone you care about. Guess they would deserve it, according to your flawed logic.
@@AdoreYouInAshXI The officers weren't in danger though the guy is clearly struggling to even walk properly. They could have extremely easily tackled him but instead used deadly force when it was very unjustified. There is no possible way that you could justify this.
What weapon ? tow hitch is not classified as a weapon .. he's not doing any swinging action with that thing that can make the cops feel threaten.. the pepper spray and baton is more than enough to tackle a drunk men to the ground.
That cop murdered him man. I mean a warning shot was all it would’ve of took to probably rattle the guy enough to calm down. But that cop straight up point blank fired off 2 rounds into that guy’s chest or head perhaps it looked like. That was flat out murder if you ask me.
No one asked you. You weren't there. And two shots fired. Two hits, and he still didn't follow their commands to get on the ground until he collapsed a full 20 seconds later. With his behavior, he'd have eventually hurt or killed someone another day.
WHEN POLICE POINT A FIREARM AT YOU AND GIVE COMMANDS, STOP WHAT YOU'RE DOING AND DO WHAT YOU'RE TOLD. YOU'LL LIVE TO SEE ANOTHER DAY.
Definitely murder.
@@828enigma6 The point is a cop using there service weapon should always be a last resort thing. He didn't have a gun just a tow hitch which can be deadly but only at very close range. He was far enough away and moving slowly so they had plenty of time to use other non lethal methods to get him down. That cop was to trigger happy. The only way i would have agreed it was justfied to shoot that soon was if he had a gun or other longer rang weapon then then what he had.
He didn’t deserve that.
He did, actually.
The person/people who he threatend to beat to death probably disagrees. I don't think anyone should have to put up with someone coming onto their property and telling them they're gonna kill them. Maybe don't drink if you're gonna have murderous tendancies, just a thought. Looks like the universe gave him the ol uno reverse card. You don't get a free pass because you married into the family. It is never alright to threaten others and even more messe dup when you do it to family.
@@honkhonkv2236" 🤓"
@@Wuh1988 Unjustified and is sad that you think that he deserved to be murdered.
Officer who fired his weapon, didn’t even communicate “fire shots fire shots” to dispatch. Unjustified killing. Officer should be in jail for taking away this guy’s life
Assahbi you live in Murrica?
Ooohhh so it's just the reporting of shots fired that determine whether it was justified or not? Makes sense. Also It's "shots fired" not the other way around
@Justice Forall a little gun happy are we ?
You may want to listen to the audio again, both officers tried to put it out and got the busy tone... I just laughed because that was your reasoning on justification...
Funny how holding a tow hitch can get you shot, but for looting and burning there isn't even a misdemeanor charge.
You are like the saying "one step forward, two steps back".
What are you talking about? Looting and arson are illegal.
The long pause by the 911 dispatcher after the caller said: "no shirt" indicated that the she knew this was going to end very badly.
Total überinterpretiert
Just remember when calling the police, this is a very possible outcome.
Not if you live in a civilised country.
Even the father in law told the dispatcher if police didn’t arrive quick enough and the drunk broke in & touched his wife he was going to shoot him. Watch the whole video from start to finish.
Our Lovely Police Are Angels Sent From Heaven!🥰
I'm glad it is. Putting more garbage in the ground instead of wasting money rotting in jail just to be released a couple of months latter.
I don’t think dad will feel too guilty about the man who was clearly an abusive drunk being out of his daughters life.
cop, he should go to jail immediately for this shooting!
as a law enforcement supporter, this shooting was unjustified.
so you admit theres a huge issue with law enforcement training right ?
you can now be killed for being drunk and uncooperative. this video is disturbing
@@Jordan-vx2ly thats not an admission of anything bruh, justs saying this is unjustified
I agree 100%. There was no reason to shoot him.
@@Jordan-vx2ly The only thing law enforcement does wrong is refuse to arrest bounty hunters, security guards, bouncers, loss prevention, and other wanna-bee cops for battery.
I'm a big supporter of law enforcement but this shooting was just simply unnecessary, the guy wasn't posing an immediate threat other than the fact he was holding an item that could've been used as a weapon. The officers should have continued using verbal commands rather than execute the guy.
Why they are a legal gang with no duty to protect. Whenever I have needed help they aren’t very interested so don’t give me that you will need a cop someday. Bare minimal.
Idk brother. I'm pretty liberal and pretty pro cop myself because of a lot of videos like these but this one had me saying he shot him pretty quickly, but they were pretty close to him tbh.
it teaches a lesson, you didnt learn anything?
Pourquoi il lui tirer dessus sa va pas non
P*ssy *ss cop
This police officer should be fired. Not a justifiable shooting. 3 cops and one drunk guy with a tow hitch. Just another poorly trained police department.
Ain’t gonna lied, sometimes when you call cops to solve a problem it’s like you should have never called them.
I agree. Social workers with clipboards are the best way to deal with belligerent drunks.
@@bunsonhoneydew9099 I hear u but let’s be real here. This is the first shooting I’ve seen that I’d consider unjustified. They could’ve at least tried to deescalate the situation more before shooting the guy. Plus he looks so drunk they probably could’ve just tackled him
I wonder if the screams and crying are from the house that called 🤷♀️ probably couldve ignored this drunk inside the house
Coming from the person who PROBABLY has a few bench warrants. Law abiding Citizens call your weird as$es in all night long. You should be ashamed and embarrassed: "Ain't gonna lied" ...haha WOW
@@ryan19754 if this the first unjustified shooting you seen you either live under a rock or are actually a r e t a r d
Woah, no threat to law enforcement and very little time trying to deescalate. This doesn't look justified.
seems justice was served
What time is appropriate? Why does the officer need to be threatened to be listened to. And how does it need to look to be justified?? Hindsight right...
That's why you don't threaten people with a tow hitch whilst drunk, and then proceed to ignore demands from the police. It probably could have been handled differently, but you don't always get second chances, as the dude that got lit up realized.
@@Richard_the_V How about when the guy actually makes an aggressive or violent move towards the officers? The suspect didn't put those officers in imminent danger or cause serious bodily harm.
This is exactly why I will never call the cops on family or someone I actually care about, having a crisis.
Exactly right in situations like this especially with you know the person, calling cops is worst decision you can make..
No doubt.
I don't get your comment. The father wanted someone else to execute his son in law so he called to cops. Right decision.
@@lennykump8396 lol yea dude was surely a worthless pos who needed a little lead poisonin
The caller said HE was going to shoot him.
It's kind of disturbing how quick American police are to end somebodies life.
Act right then.
@@777SFINN777fr
It's pretty bad when cops clearly have a drunk man that can barely walk and instead of taking him to the ground they just shoot him. Unbelievable!!!!
They're cowards. It's practically a job requirement.
Cope and seethe
nobody wants to get bludgeoned by a tow hitch
How about you taking him on with a wrench in his hand.
There was no rush, he wasn't going to get away. They should give the guy a minute to realize the situation, wait for more backup, and go hands on.
That poor woman screaming after asking "did you shoot him?" OMG 😭😭
His momma :(
@@danos3284 it was her son in law not her son. Still heartbreaking
Maybe she could have done something beforehand, to avoid such kind of situation. It was an unjustified shooting, no doubt about that, but often people dont think ahead...
@@alizaepstein6567 thanks yeah terrible situation
the cop that shot him should go to jail
That moment you realize it's a Law and Crime video and not Police Activity where the entire scene is blurred out.
Usually im on the officers side, but this just seems like they killed him for no reason, the guy wasnt being aggressive he was just walking
That was sarcasm, right? You're joking, right?
How is ripping off someone's screen door "not being aggressive"?
Are you blind?He had a knife and didn't comply maybe they should've waited till he ran at them or one of the public 🙄
*Walking toward the officers with a tow hitch after being told to drop it lol. Comply and you will not die.
@@djrampantuk are you blind? 😆 🤣 lol it was a tow hitch not a knife. And I agree. He wasn't charging them. He was slowly walking drunk 🥴 you could tell he was drunk af as ge didn't even flinch when shot then stood dazed for 5 seconds then collapsed.
That cop was a coward he didn't. Even charge at them he just wanted to shoot.him because in all.his years he never discharged his weapon so he didn't want to retire until he had a story to tell his wife and children what a coward
He didn't drop the weapon so was shot. End of story. Coward, no. Who wants to be hit in the head with a trailer hitch? That's not cowardice its self-preservation; but he took the shot to protect the family that had been threatened with death threats by the drunk. If you were paying attention the drunk starts heading back there when the cops show up.
Now imagine that was you in your front yard and you shot someone like that. You would be in prison for the rest of your life absolutely without a doubt
And he was shooting into or towards that house where there could be children or anyone else !!!!
If it was you on your own property its most likely self defense, and the only way someone was getting hit was if the officer missed, those rounds aren’t going to pierce through him🧐 and he will almost never miss at point blank against someone moving like a sloth, but in the end it was unjustified.
@@thiccnsaltytv998 In a lot of states unfortunately, if you assault or kill someone on your property; you go down because you were "supposed to retreat or avoid the individual as best you could" before lethal force is used. You actually have to wait for them to come into your house. It call all be argued if you have a good enough lawyer though.
Civilians can't do things cops can. You are comparing apples and oranges. Instantly your argument falls apart the second you type it out. Police have law enforcement powers civilians don't have.
@@thiccnsaltytv998 def could have passed thru. I've had the smallest caliber do a in and out on me .
Never call the police unless you want someone to die.
How is a tow hitch called for shooting a drunk shirtless man twice? Cop should be ashamed.
Why is everything ramped up to deadly force within seconds? You have two cops armed with battons, presumably trained on how to use them but no, straight to the gun. Don’t tell me they were afraid for their lives, British cops deal with this crap daily without needing a body bag.
that is your opinion
some of us are sick and tired of violent drunks getting a slap on the wrist
I love it when cops kill drunks in public
American cops YEAH!
While I question this one...lets be fair and admit the truth. This wasn't "straight to the gun" dude was tazed at least once and it had zero effect. He then walked towards the home with a weapon.
We can't blame the cops in Uvalde out of one side of our mouths and then blame cops out of the other.
Dude was a threat, ignoring orders, with a weapon in his hands, moving towards a residence. He deserved to be tazed' when that doesn't work what do we expect the cop does next?
The guy was approaching the front door of the residence. Were the police supposed to let him go inside and kill someone?
@@deanm2075 Exactly. Why are the other commenters acting like they're blind? It's all shown on the video. They couldn't allow him to go inside the house and kill someone.
Should be in jail 15+ years for that. Pure insanity and blood thirsty.
Did they really have to execute him?
Did he really have to get drunk and threaten to beat people to death on their own property?
@@Wuh1988 He didn't threaten to beat people to death listen to the call. Dude was not a threat and was murdered for no reason
@@NITROOOO_YO no you listen to the call. Caller was definitely in fear of death or harm to him or a loved one
@@johncena-hq1ti The caller was not in fear of death lmao listen to the call the guy is insanely calm and could have locked a door but you like people getting killed so idk what to tell you
@@NITROOOO_YO calm doesn’t mean anything lol. He literally said the guy is trying to break in my house. If he does or touches my wife I will shoot him. Call doesn’t mean he wasn’t in fear of this guy.
“Sir, sir If he had to watch a movie 10 times what movie would that be”
Victim never raised a weapon, simply intoxicated.Didn't deserve to be executed in such a brutal manner!Shame on the Modesto Police Dept
From Adelaide South Australia
Too drunk to comply
What do you expect? It's California.
I think it was a justified shooting, the guy clearly was in for a attack. I hope his family learned there lesson and keep there drunk or drugged-up family members off the street.
@@VicGreenBitcoin should take a lesson from the police in the uk they seem to tackle people armed with knives and all sorts of weapons just fine and they dont have guns, you dont need to shoot everyone you see they could have easily took him to the ground, American cops are ridiculous no wonder there is so much murder there
THIS IS AMERICA DUDE. THE LAND OF THE FREE (TO SHOOT AND KILL INNOCENT CIVS). THE LAND OF THE HOMELESS, AND LAND OF DRUGS, AND BOMBING INNOCENT CIVILIANS OVERSEAS.
This was literally an execution. Disgusting.
Afraid so. They probably feel like real men for killing a drunk.
👍
@@jorgearagon2035 LMFAO dont get drunk and pick fights. - a drunk
Not justified...he was not an immediate threat to life..he didn't charge, didn't have a gun...this was handled improperly. Officer that fired should be charged.
Nothing short of a life sentence in my opinion. That was straight up murder.
A police officer should never bring more aggression into the situation than the situation is. Paul was calm and showed no aggression. The shooting was groundless and unjustified!
So the officers should've waited for him to attack them? No way! He didn't listen to any verbal commands. Would you wait for a wolf to shred you to pieces before you shoot it? I don't think so. The officers gave him more than enough chances to drop the weapon, he didn't comply and got shot. Very good reaction from the Officers!
@@mista__g__
It is only your assumption, and theirs, was that he was going to attack them. Clearly the man was inebriated to the point where all the officers had to do was out-finesse him and quickly apprehend him. When the taser had no effect (as is often the case with drunk people) the cops' adrenaline level was the only thing that got out of control.
No violent crime was committed other than the senseless killing by cops, who don't wear bulletproof helmets because they don't want to intimidate the public with a military-like presence, but will shoot a man simply for being too drunk to immediately comply.
maybe it's me who's drunk but..i didn't see him act violent...yes taser failed ..but ..straight to murder? because a drunk guy is uncooperative? ...did he threaten to tow them?
this was cowardly murder plain and simple.
he wasnt violent . he could barely put one foot in front of the other and the police officer is yelling as if he is wielding an exe and about to murder 10 people
I suspect it's the way he sort of altered the direction of his movement that prompted the officer to fire. The suspect is moving more or less parallel to them until 7:38 or 8:59 (for each respective camera perspective), when he stops after getting Tased before beginning walking again in a trajectory that's *slightly* more in the direction of the closest officer while saying "Chill". Immediately afterward, the other officer fires.
My initial suspicion is that he wasn't actually intent on braining the officer he was advancing toward, but that his change in direction was either a simple drunken stagger or his brain adjusting subconsciously due to the curving garden bed in front of him cutting off his initial parallel movement. This is all 100% conjecture on my part, mind you.
He's also walking towards the person's house that he was trying to assault in the first place
It sucks that tasers don’t do anything and there’s no other commonly used less lethal to opt for but it is what it is. If the taser doesn’t work multiple times and the person keeps moving towards an officer or a civilian with a weapon in hand what should they do? Wait until the weapon is used and someone is hurt? I don’t think so.
The man on the phone wanted to shoot him too. Asked the 911 if he was allowed to didn't he?
wow he shot too fast, honestly this was not justifyable, he wasnt listening, but made no attempt to charge, swing, or attack in any way
He was listening because he said no when they told him to put it down. The fact that he pulled out the taser shows that if he charged the officer he would be hard to stop. I back this shoot. Even after shot he stood there for a hot minuite,he was on something that he didnt feel pain. You dont take a chance with those people.
I didn't see any crimes being committed until the police showed up
Until the uniformed serial killer showed up, yes.
You wouldn't... There was no camera.
I've been tasered once when I was a kid while running from the cops. My muscles immediately lock up like I was frozen stiff and I couldn't breath. I fell face down with my arms and hands underneath my body. The cops then told me "Put your hands behind your back or I will shoot you!" while pressing and holding the button for 10 seconds at a time then releasing it. I tired to reply back but I had no air in my lungs to speak. After about 30 secs I was finally able to move my arms and put them behind my back. I was very close to being shot. They hit me right next to my heart. The next day I had a base ball size lump on my chest.
Honestly this was a bad shoot. The guy was so drunk they coulda walked up and pushed him over! He didn’t have the capacity to fist fight two cops. The hitch wasn’t even brandished at anyone!
Yet he brushed a taser off like nothing. Last time I checked being drunk doesn’t make you immune from tasers or so drunk to the point where you can’t comprehend a cop telling you to drop the weapon
Shots were premature, but so crazy how he just stood there after taking lead to the body.
I think the taser and bullets made him stiff. His right heel never touched the ground in that moment.
Shock and adrenaline will do that to ya
It probably didn’t register. Similar to the commands.
Apparently people usually only fall after being shot because they've seen it in movies. Generally a bullet won't knock you down, but it also depends on the weapon used and the victims state of mind.
@@icarusalchemist1398 I was gonna mention the fact he didn’t fall. Which is what made it strange...
I’m not a law officer and I’ve never been in that situation. That being said I’ve seen other videos where officers were confronted with even more aggressive individuals and they held off shooting and made the arrest. It’s all a judgment call but in this situation given what I saw from my layman’s perspective, I don’t think the shooting needed to occurr so quickly.
It wasn’t a gun and he wasn’t moving or making any threatening gestures towards the officers and his hands were in full view the whole time it’s not like it was done at night with uncertainty. They should’ve tried to use another taser Or perhaps a beanbag gun. That being said very unfortunate that it had to happen
I agree, there were two officers there... even tackling him to the ground would have worked. It was clearly a tow hitch and not a knife or gun.
Have you ever been hit on the head with a solid piece of steel? It will kill you. You guys have no idea what you’re talking about.
Senseless.
his last words were 'Chill, Chill', definitely menacing and I feared for my life.
Not to mention the officer shot towards civilian home that was occupied bad decisions all the way around
Wow he actually stayed up for about 10 seconds 😆
That cop is a murderer.
He didn't do his job right.
He needs to go to prison.
He got scared like a chicken
That cop protected the caller from the drunk. He did his job. IF you have a weapon in your hand and don't drop it, cops will shoot you.
@@rmsg7504 you must not understand what being drunk does to the mind
@@Darkfoot21 I understand it just fine, doesn't take a genius. IT doesn't excuse his behavior otherwise NO ONE would ever be charged with a DUI. Suddenly being a drunk is a get out of jail card? Get real.
@@rmsg7504 never claimed it was a get out of jail card, the point is the guy never went to jail, I wanted that guy in jail, instead he was just killed
Also DUI's are a thing BECAUSE it changes your behavior
Videos like this might actually end up deterring people from calling police for help with family members..who’d risk receiving trigger happy police when it’s your own family?
That cop was WAY too quick to use lethal imo.
it wont because not every caller sees these videos, ever see the cop murder the deaf guy who had a pen knife and was sitting on a bench whittling ? the cop told him to put the knife down three times then shot him 16 times for not obeying the guy didn't even hear the gunshots . someone called the cops on him
There was a case here where I live, a family with a mentally I’ll son refused to call the cops when he acted up out of fear that the police would shoot him. The cops here are trigger happy too. The kid ended up beheading his own father in the kitchen one day.
what ever happened to comments like "if he'd complied with the officers he'd still be alive?".... oh wait never mind, i see his make up
Yup
Everyone has the opinion cop is too quick to use lethal, until they are in jeopardy then they complain the cop didn't use lethal fast enough.
Murder.. murder.. never said he's being detained..never said police.
Cant you see that. With your eyes?
He had a grudge. This is obvious by the way he told 911 "some drunk man" was at his door, when the truth is it was his son-in-law. He called a gun to do what he himself wanted to do, but couldn't.
im pretty sure he woulda smoked him he was asking the cop if he could shoot him, dont know why your making asumptions about someone you dont know
wtf are you talking about
Good shot! No more problems! ???any questions
His question to the dispatcher was pretty odd, too: "If he comes through the door, do I get a chance to shoot him?" Says a lot about his state of mind.
He clearly states to the dispatcher that it is his son in law.
When you are commenting on the use of force in the video, consider that the tow hitch is heavy enough to fracture a skull, destroy an eye socket, or break a cervical vertebrae in one swing. Yes there are three big LEOs available. Who is willing to be the one that gets hit in a fight? The drunk guy may, or may not get a swing in before he goes down. If he does, potentially devastating results could occur. What other non lethal options is this dept outfitted with? Are the officers equipped and trained in options other than the taser? If the taser is the only other option, that leaves one other choice. I would want to know what that dept trains.
Excuses. They tasered him and could have done it again. They are TRAINED to handle hostile situations appropriately. And should use lethal force if he had gotten in range. He wasn’t and he was indeed murdered
Yes, and the guy could also be under the influence of drugs. They can allow someone to turn on a dime, become super-violent, and also VERY STRONG. I think folks need to stop being so quick to judge. The guy kept moving, never obeyed any command. That’s when you put yourself at risk. A cop never shot a complicit person.
@@r.joseph8911 Complicit of what? Disobedience is not a a crime punishable by death. They could have even shot him in the legs. The guy wasn't moving much.
What you have witnessed here is MURDER. The man did NOT rush at police brandishing anything that could be defined as a weapon. If anything he as walking away from the police. They cold bloodedly targeted this guy and brutally shot him to death. Being intoxicated is not a death penalty offence. These cops need to be charged, tried and sent to prison for the rest of their coward lives.
Police are the same everywhere. It's as if they all get the same incompetent people training them. This man was reported as being drunk. When does anyone who is drunk listen to orders from someone who they don't know. And in a case like this. That person may not even recognize those people as being the police. The problem with police is the annoying tendency to constantly yell commands at the top of their lungs. I have proven time and again in the past how that initiates an uncooperative response rather than a cooperative one. Basic psychology 101, but they still keep doing it. If this fellow had a Wife and kids I feel very sorry for their loss.
that was pure murder.. the guy didnt charge.. raise his hands.. or do any threatening actions besides stand there... that was not needed.. If that was my son or brother being shot like that and i witnessed it being done like this i would have done some pretty bad things to that cop
Yes, and the idiots defending the murderous cop would be the first ones bashing a female cop if she did the exact, same thing.
I don't usually agree with your comments but in this case you're correct.
They targeted him ? Typical anti police Crap. How’s that , they were called to the scene.
He had a freaking trailer hitch those things are so heavy you can’t do anything with them. This was definitely murder.
I fail to see why the use if deadly force was required. He didn't threaten to use the object on anyone, he simply did not comply to drop it.
Yeahhh.. I understand that some people are still able to cause damage after taking gun shots. But I feel like this is the perfect situation to put a few in his knee cap or lower legs.
again and again why not comply
when you are constantly telling someone to drop something, they dont, you use your means of non-lethal force and it has no effect. Lethal force is the next logical step.
Its very simple, drop your ego, listen to what the cops are telling you to do, especially at gunpoint. and you will live.
That is what the training teaches these officers. They are cowards.
Ya...that was not required
This is why I don't call the police
Is there nothing you would call the police for? No hate - just asking.
Hope you own guns then
Same here!
I laughed at that. Can't give it a thumbs up, but I like the humor.
Lies. Hopefully you'll never have to call them. But rest assured, one day you'll have no choice.
Wow...that went too far way too fast. One taser shot, no threatening actions, aside from non compliance, and he's shot in the torso two times? I think this defines excessive. It's absolutely wrong to no not comply with lawful orders, but was this worth executing him?
Here’s the deal. What he had in his hand could kill someone pretty quickly. Although some departments would have backed off and continued shouting the same thing at him I don’t really think that’s something they should be expected to do. When a situation like this is prolonged the danger to the public and officers present just grow. The guy had an adequate chance to determine that these officers saw him as a threat and to listen to commands.
Huh. Are you high? Or blind
Note that the taser was not effective, so they went to the next level.I agree with you. From the father in-law call he also felt threatened enough to tell the dispatcher that if he enters his house can shoot him.
If t you listened to the tape the Father-in-law asks the dispatcher if he comes into my house can I shoot him? So the father in law knows that his son-in-law is a threat. The taser was ineffective and he was holding a weapon that could kill.
Well, you guys combined have a whooping 1 like. I have 17. I’m going to stop trying to convince you three that execution wasn’t necessary at that moment. Take care.
Completely unjust !!! Gun happy cop .how do you justify shooting a man standing still not putting your life in danger and they knew he was drunk!!!!!
He had a towing hitch if someone gets hit with that it can knock some out so they had a right to shoot him
No accountability and a blood lust....that's how.
Standing still? Did you even watch the video? He stands still just long enough to detach the taser then he squares up and advances toward the officer.
@@ghostgaming-78-l5l he wasn't using the towing hitch he was standing there with his back to the man that shot him or did you not see the video . he was drunk out of his mind and you don't shoot drunk people that aren't moving or threatening anyone. You're not a very bright person, thank God you're not a police officer. Wish that were one of your family members. Then I'd love to hear your response after seeing the video. Watch it again a couple more times
@@johnwyatt3677 it’s blurred out beiges the shooting but you can see he clearly was facing and appeared to be advancing towards the officers. Watch a few more times….
Plain an simple.that was straight up murder and was uncalled for those two scared clowns should have never become cops
Would you like to get hit over the head with a tow hitch or would you shoot the psycho?
Thanks Mr cop dude, for saving us all from that tow hitch.
cali cops.
Deadly weapon
@@christ9467 A pencil is a deadly weapon. So shoot everyone then?
Outlaw tactical tow hitches
@@christ9467 that cop probably still shot if he was holding chopsticks.
They just killed a man that most likely had more curage and heart in his little finger than these cowards have in their entire body's.
I’d never call the cops on someone I cared about. We deal with our own because this is always a possibility once the cops arrive. To many trigger happy people out there.
@ is someone that acts like this really family?
And if someone cared about you, they wouldn't be acting like that.
@@djayt1215 not all families are perfect. Sometimes people can get drunk and make mistakes. It’s important for families to forgive each other and not just call (snitch) police on each other without mercy.
@@djayt1215 Act like what? Drunk?
@@djayt1215 Yea if someone acts like this they are still family. The guy is Drunk? Have you not seen a drunk guy before?
i agree with cops a lot but not on this one. He didn’t charge them and wasn’t an immediate threat. You’re telling me 2 cops can’t take a hitch from a drunk man that can barely walk. Hitch wasn’t even in his hand when they killed him
they shot him 1st and then he dropped it
Cops refuse to take ANY risk whatsoever now. This was but a small example. Uvalde was an extreme distilled example
One swing to the head with a tow hitch and you could easily die. Idk about this one mang.
It was in his hand he didn't drop it until after the 2 shots but the guy also didn't really do anything aggressive. I feel like they could have spent more time on getting him to comply.
@Jake Lingenfelter except he didn't need to get shot and he should not have been shot. This was 100% unjustified.
The fact one cop pulled a taser and kept his distance even after using it and the other pulled his gun and went forward shot twice at a man who wasn't even looking at him says it all really.
Happens all the time. Tasers are known to not affect people.
@@ARDG89 better way of saying it is tasers don't work on some people because if both of those hooks don't make contact in his flesh then there isn't any current, meaning it wont do anything
Police officers are allowed to use force to protect themselves. You obviously don't know anything about policing.
@@truthspeaker7553 right But not this I mean dude look the cop was nit in danger there’s zero sign normally you’ll shoot after they start running at the cop in this case they didn’t
@@truthspeaker7553 you need to change your batshit name because you're talking some untruths.
2 cops cant control a drunked men ??? WTF are you learning in Police school, who has the biggest Kill Streak or WHAT ???
"Do I get a chance to shoot him?"
You reallllllly should not be this eager to kill someone unless they've done something insanely bad.
Wooooooah, that cop should be in some trouble, that was insanely early with no sign of an attack.
He was going straight towards the people he was threatening to kill.. with a weapon, not complying & a taser didn't phase him.
@@Mandy-nt2cs Some drunk fool with a tire iron surrounded by the police was posing that much of a risk? We can't just shoot everybody like that.
Maybe you can put on a badge and wrestle the next crazy guy with a trailer hitch and let us know how it goes. The guy has every right to protect his home.
You apparently haven't had to be in that type of situation if they give him a lawful order to drop the hitch and he keeps advancing in their direction i would have shot to probably until the target dropped.the police made a good call if he would've thrown the hitch he could've knocked the cop out and he possibly could taken his gun and then what .....just think about it that way they do the dirt for you everyday so you don't have to kill that thief that breaks in Your house and raps your daughter or even worse ...blue lives matter to
@@Mandy-nt2cs The officers didn't get any first hand evidence of that threat so it should be worth about 0 in this situation. The fact that the taser failed doesn't necessarily mean anything regarding the guy - there are a lot of things that have to happened right for a taser to work properly.
If the only tool you have is a hammer every problem seems like a nail.
Way too quick to shoot people. That escalated quick. Not sure that was a lethal force scenario.
It definitely wasn't, at least not at that moment. Maybe it would've escalated later, but it was nowhere near justifying lethal force at that point
That's because you're clueless.
Guy was being a drunken nuisance. He didnt need to die AT ALL.
@@robertharper3114 he didnt need to walk to random house after being tazed with dangerous object in hand. he get what he deserved.
@@sajuente8235 He was intoxicated. If you believe he deserved to die then you're sub-human. Hope something like this never has to happen in your family. The Modesto PD are getting sued by the family for unnecessary use of lethal force, and THEY are getting what they deserve.
I'm willing to bet most people here have been this drunk at one point or another. I'm sure most of us have also been in a terrifying and delicate situation whilst heavily under the influence.
This officer shot 2 rounds into this man within 15 seconds of seeing his face. He didn't need shot, he just needed some help.
If you're really this afraid of people and you're not willing to do what you know is right due to your own cowardice then by all means turn in your badge and go look for another job, this one's not for you.
Perp ignored commands, had a deadly weapon, was unaffected by a taser. Officer's shot at last opportunity Before the perp could create a risk to the house occupants.
Ignoring commands doesn't justify murder, it wasn't a gun or even a knife and it was at his side. He was so intoxicated he could barely walk and the cop shot him point blank without the guy ever once making any threatening movements other than stumbling forward. Also, the first thing I thought was how he was aiming directly into someone's house with no thought of where his shots might land.
Never been drunk. When you are drunk a lot of bad things can happen. Not worth it.
@@mikeriordan1811 You forgot to add while under the influence of Alcohol. He had a Weapon in his hand but did he raise it up and use it? Nope.
You people disgust me. It's like there's no compassion left. What if this was someone you knew quite well and cared about? What then?
@@mikeriordan1811 he was never gonna enter that house in his current state
What actually makes me angry about this is, they decided to blur out the fella before he was shot. For the love of all, we are not babies, we are not innocent, we are not weak, just put a disclaimer on the video, and don't blur it. If we can't handle it, then its our fault after being warned before we watch something. I mean, sense this was justified, there is no reason to blur it out now is there? When ever evidence is doctored in this way, my first thoughts are not, "thank goodness they protected my eyes".. its always the same "What are they hiding from me?" that goes through my mind. You create doubt when you edit the footage in this way.
Wtf is wrong with you? It's just disrespectful to the victim and his family, and something like this doesn't belong on a platform where every 9-year-old can pretend to be 18. brooo
@@overkill20979
It is not disrespectful to his family, or to anyone to show his face or what happened. In fact, its disrespectful to him and his family to edit the video in this way.
That 9 year old you are so worried about, has seen millions of times worse on T.V. and if his or her parents can't figure out parental controls for their kid, that is the parents fault not anyone else's fault.
@@overkill20979
or in other words, whats wrong with you?
@@overkill20979 wait, other people lie so I’m punished? Tf?
Wtf is wrong with you
It's like, most the time I'm on the cops side and then there's situations like this where I'm just completely baffled at their actions.
Dudes uncooperative the tasers not working, he’s still walking to the officers it’s been proven a person can close a 20 foot distance to you before you can I holster your weapon and fire if you don’t they’ll already be on you. A guy with a blunt object can kill someone
Lol so kill them before they try now?
Same here
So what exactly did the police do wrong? How come bounty hunters were allowed to shoot Walter Hutchins dead, but a police officer can't defend himself against an aggressor?
For the record, I HATE the police since they arrest people for "robbery" if they defend themselves against retail loss prevention and allow bounty hunters to break into our homes, but I'm sick of Police Academy dropouts like bounty hunters, loss prevention, bouncers, and armed guards being allowed to use lethal force when the real police aren't allowed to do the same.
Same here
I’ve never seen someone shot and freeze standing up like that
they missed him twice
@@PHlophe lol that man is dead
You still haven't. It was blurred.
That is not a shooting by a cop, that is point blank MURDER BY A COP. The man may be drunk, he may be on a substance but none of that changes the fact that the man made zero threating moves towards the officer who discharged the gun. The man was walking slowly shown by both police cameras, there was NO need to open fire. Yes, the man didn't follow instructions but then again, he did nothing hostile in the presence of the officers other than walking from point A to point B and all of the sudden, Pew pew pew.. Charge the cop. Set an example,
Yes that was straight up Murder !
We’re is the national news coverage?
I agree. Literally no reason to use lethal force
There’s no example to set, situations aren’t handled well all the time, this as an example, but from the point of confronting police with a weapon it’s unreasonable to expect very calm treatment.
Does this guy have there right to expect perfect non violent treatment when engaging in a situation like this?
@@sawyermcbride1522 If the cops are scared, they are welcome to turn in their badges and apply at the bakery, Its part of the job, its why they are given specialized training that they so often fail to use. When they approach a citizen armed with a blunt force weapon, its not difficult to realize that this is a close encounter type of weapon, keep distance, give time, de eseclate the situation, not 3..2...1 ..Shoot shoot
@E G have you ever thrown a trailer drawbar? I bet you couldn’t throw one beyond 10 feet. If you swung one your arm would move so slow I could tickle your armpit less than half way through your swing. Next time you are at an auto parts store or Home Depot pick one up.
This is murder.He showed NO hostile actions to the officers.I really do hope the officer who shot him is charged with murder.
What a lovely society.
Pepper spray would have been very affective here or even bean bag shot gun. Homie was super drunk but walking with something in your hand with your hands down isn't threatening!
His father in Law caused his death by tell the dispatcher he wants to shot him. The guy didn’t do anything except being drunk. They shot him for no reason. Both cops should be in jail for murder.
i think taser cop acted appropriately. he couldnt fathom "a shooting" because there was just no reason to shoot.
The sky was allegedly blue and the grass was allegedly green lol.
A drunk or drugged man and he looked like he was no threat, carrying a big spanner, in the UK the police would have rugby tackled him to the ground without a gun pointing, this was properly out of order, poor guy and family, surely the officer should have tried to talk to him before murdering him.....the US is nuts!!!!
About 20 years ago the police here would have done the same thing
That was definitely unjustified right there. This cop is losing his job and more I'm sure of it.
Wow I hope that cop was fired and the right actions were taken against him, that was in no way a reason to shoot a man.
Another fantastic example of where a taser has little to no effect on someone. He simply pulls the probes and keeps walking. Amazing.😧
That officer shot way too soon, there was no immediate threat to their lives, they should of used a less lethal way like the taser again. More training is definitely needed and that officer needs to be held accountable
whatever
the dude had a deadly weapon and on top of that pulled the taser prongs out while he was being tazed. do you think a bean bag gun or pepper spray is gonna do any better? let alone tazing him again
Because it worked so well the first time? Lethal encounter from the start, the Officer only used the Taser because he had lethal backup.
Dude could have been knee deep in water completely naked and the tazer still has a chance to fail. Problem is when you defund the police you slow development of the tools they use such as tazers and other non lethal weapons.
But that trailer hitch could have gone off any second!
Never call the Death Squad on someone you're not willing to see killed
@Ryan666 you're the same kind of redneck that wants to open carry a hunting rifle in public without getting shot. Make up your mind. Besides I'm talking about calling the police on your own family, mind your own
When you finally get rid of them, no one is going to protect people like you from people like me. Good luck!
@@somewhitman4040 some of us are still getting the job done with them around. Where you at?
This is why you only call the cops as an absolute last resort when dealing with family arguments/fights.. too many times stuff like this happens
and it only happens in the USA, your police seem either incapable or unwilling to defuse situations without killing suspects, its amazing to other forces across the world that you have such little concern for your own citizens.
@@mariadowler1279 You speak freely for so many other countries that it denies your credibility.
so, all those “snitches” stories save people? I absolutely disagree with your premise. If the criminal won’t listen to cops who will they listen to? Get the cops there BEFORE it gets worse. “Last resort” has got to be the most dangerous advice I’ve heard. This guy in the video had a weapon and was breaking stuff. I dont think the cop should’ve shot him the way it happened but I’m glad they called the cops.
@@mariadowler1279 only in america are so many people ready and willing to kill cops or die trying
@@mariadowler1279 -- That's a good point, MD, but keep in mind that this type thing only happens a few dozen times a year in the U.S., in a country of three hundred million people.
They should send the Cops to Prison The Guy wasn't doing anything but walking drunk
That poor woman crying was heartbreaking......😞
Death has a immediately effect
@@MarcoYoloDigitals what?
@@MarcoYoloDigitals Depends on how close to death we’ve been
Oh boo hoo. 😄
@@martinmi5 Love hearing mothers cry 😈
Whoever invented the taser should face a trial.
A watergun is more reliable.
I guess you haven’t seen all the taser trust falls on the internet
Have you ever been tased? Lmfaoo. It drops 250 pound men like Babies. This guy was on something.
When the woman asked if they shot her husband the officer happily said yup and they did nothing to afterwards she was screaming in horror cause they murdered her husband and by how he fell you can tell that it was an instant lethal shot to the heart , the officer aimed for the guys heart so it would be fatal.
Let's hope karma is real and will visit the cops's family as well. Then, he will know how it feels.
If you are going to shoot center mass is the place to shoot, you want any misses to still be on target and you want them to stop the threat as soon as possible...although it didn't look like this guy was a threat.
@@jorgearagon2035 Dayum dawg lmao
It was her son, not her husband. Her husband was the one that called 911. He said on the call it was his son-in-law that was drunk.
@@jorgearagon2035 exept its the dudes fault, not the cops
I think the officer may have jumped the gun on this one no pun intended. He wasnt charging anyone with a weapon he just seemed unresponsively drunk