The Apostles were all Praeterist and wrote about the second coming in year generation. Revelation was written before AD70 but John's gospel was written after as witness to his return.
But those in Christ are judged by their works to check their faith that they are in Christ, if not they are condemned in Adam, and they are judged when they die.
I agree, I don't subscribe to preterism. It's a pretty bold statement to say, "one of the false teachings..." Has it ever occurred to you that you have an equally unique perspective as anyone else? Are you the sole authority upon whom we shall find true doctrine? In understand that most "respectable" scholars agree that Revelation was written around AD95. That doesnt mean thay are all correct. Most "respectable" schollars of Jesus' day rejected him. Most "respectable" scholars today agree that Origen of Alexandria was properly anathematized by the church (he was not). Most "respectable" scholars today agree that Christianity is fundamentally centered around getting "saved" unto a pleasant afterlife vs an unpleasant one. It is not. There are many things "most respectable scholars" agree on that may very well be very wrong. Jesus didn't come to warm of a looming judgement, his advent was a declaration of good tidings to all. What we have today is a christian religion, in any flavor, FAR from what Jesus came to proclaim.
Your last remarks is so true. Even as the apostles wrote epistles false teaching abounded, and in the 2nd century Christianity divorced from its roots of the law of Abraham.
There are a lot of opinions in understanding the Bible. Some are harmless, and thus can't be considered false teachings, but some are very important and address or oppose the basic Principles of the Christian Faith. It is not about understanding one verse in a certain way, but rather denying a tenant of The Christian Faith. The danger of Full Preterism is that it denies several basic principles, the Great Hope of the coming of Jesus is just one of them, in addition to the actuality and reality of judgement. Therefore, I badly consider full preterism as false doctrine, not our of prejudice or claims of exclusivity of Truth, but due to denying the basic tenant of Christianity, judgement, a Biblical principle supported by 10s of passages all across scriptures.
Thank you so much 💞 Finally someone has addressed multiple fulfillment of prophecy! 🙏💗
The Apostles were all Praeterist and wrote about the second coming in year generation. Revelation was written before AD70 but John's gospel was written after as witness to his return.
Nothing in your comment is proven historically.
But those in Christ are judged by their works to check their faith that they are in Christ, if not they are condemned in Adam, and they are judged when they die.
I agree, I don't subscribe to preterism.
It's a pretty bold statement to say, "one of the false teachings..."
Has it ever occurred to you that you have an equally unique perspective as anyone else? Are you the sole authority upon whom we shall find true doctrine?
In understand that most "respectable" scholars agree that Revelation was written around AD95. That doesnt mean thay are all correct. Most "respectable" schollars of Jesus' day rejected him. Most "respectable" scholars today agree that Origen of Alexandria was properly anathematized by the church (he was not). Most "respectable" scholars today agree that Christianity is fundamentally centered around getting "saved" unto a pleasant afterlife vs an unpleasant one. It is not.
There are many things "most respectable scholars" agree on that may very well be very wrong.
Jesus didn't come to warm of a looming judgement, his advent was a declaration of good tidings to all.
What we have today is a christian religion, in any flavor, FAR from what Jesus came to proclaim.
Your last remarks is so true. Even as the apostles wrote epistles false teaching abounded, and in the 2nd century Christianity divorced from its roots of the law of Abraham.
There are a lot of opinions in understanding the Bible. Some are harmless, and thus can't be considered false teachings, but some are very important and address or oppose the basic Principles of the Christian Faith. It is not about understanding one verse in a certain way, but rather denying a tenant of The Christian Faith. The danger of Full Preterism is that it denies several basic principles, the Great Hope of the coming of Jesus is just one of them, in addition to the actuality and reality of judgement. Therefore, I badly consider full preterism as false doctrine, not our of prejudice or claims of exclusivity of Truth, but due to denying the basic tenant of Christianity, judgement, a Biblical principle supported by 10s of passages all across scriptures.