I agree. Plus, I'd rather see the Philippines as greener, cleaner, and more orderly. There's no point having supertall buildings when there are still squatters living in squalor in other parts of the city. It's just a "yabang" point that we should and could not afford - yet.
A super tall building with a small building foot print is more environmentally friendly than a 3 to 4 story building with a very huge building foot print. Look at HongKong, they manage to maintain and preserve 70 percent of their forest since their own government limits the urban development to a maximum of only 30 percent of the total area of HongKong.
@@moymoythehappymonkey3155 That's true BUT the Philippine land situation is hardly comparable to Hongkong's. At any rate, that's what has been done at BGC and other business centers but would hardly apply to most parts of the Philippines.
As of now we don't need super tall buildings. We need to improve the transportation specially trains and bridges to connect all the province from Luzon, Visayas and Mindanao.. And also if posible to connect Sabah. We need more investors here in the Philippines and lowering the electricity
Philippines doesn't belong in top 10 in terms of the world's super tall buildings, but try to look their Shopping Malls and indoor Arenas. You'll be surprise. And for me it's for practical to first prioritize those kind of buildings than to have a super luxury supertall super iconic super expensive buildings. Shopping Malls and indoor arenas are far more flexible and plenty of use compare to supertall iconic towers. 😅 (just my opinion).
well, sabah should still belong to malaysia bevause if you look at it in every angle, sabah is still malaysia. malaysia has far more GDP PER CAPITA than philippines. use google to learn
Sir saakin lang Po to idea ha wag Kang Magalit pero pwede Po ba lahat cleanliness discipline at tower? Hehe Kasi naiingit ako sa iBang bansa bansa may nga tower Sila at mga iconic Po .. kaya as a millennial that's one of my dream to my country na magkaroo. Talaga Po Ng Isang iconic tower Ang pinas hehe my own idea lang po
Yes, Before having Supertall Skyscrapers, we must Prioritize the Welfare of every 110M Filipinos, such by Cracking Down on Corruption, Educating all Filipinos to Discipline like the Japanese, and Singaporeans, building at least 10 Lines of MRT/LRT in Metro Manila by 2030, and more.
Kaya dapat si Robredo nanalo kasi nasa economic plan niya dapat transparent lahat ng pulitiko sa pera nila. Eh kaso si Marcos nanalo and ayaw niya ipakita mga wealth ng mga kasama niyang corrupt 😂
No, we don't need supertall skyscrapers. Just an iconic landmark, like Sydney Opera House. Doesn't have to be tall. It just needs to be unique, iconic and Filipino - ish structure.
That's a bad investments. Sydney Opera House is an expensive fancy building. You don't believe me, read: Sydney Australia's iconic Opera House is actually a study in a project failure. Its original plan had a four-year timetable and an AU $7 million budget, but in the end, it took AU $102 million and 14 years to complete.
And who told you that Philippines don't need a supertall building? I doubt you are not a Filipino and Philippine improvement will hurt you because of jealousy
@@braunx1080 of course we Filipinos..fyi think and analyze having a very tall and iconic building it can improve our tourism industry..every building made there is a purpose and add improvement to a country. And who told you its not needed? You? That no analysis?
Marina Bay Sands of SIngapore, THe Shards, The Gherkin & Walkie Talkie of London, Sydney opera house, & Burj Al Arab are not famous because of their height but because of their "UNIQUE" design so for the PHilippines, I prefer to have an outstanding, out of this world designed skyscaper rather than a super-tall one.
Philippines doesn't belong in top 10 in terms of the world's super tall buildings, but try to look their Shopping Malls and indoor Arenas. You'll be surprise. And for me it's more practical to first prioritize those kind of buildings than to have a super luxury supertall super iconic super expensive buildings. Shopping Malls and indoor arenas are far more flexible and plenty of use compare to supertall iconic towers. 😅 (just my opinion).
@@codelessunlimited7701 uh? Marina bay sands-most famous casino hotel in SG, all these London skyscrapers are privately owned which caters international banking and insurance companies, & the sydney opera house is always fully-booked showcasing Aussie's international acclaimed classical & cultural shows....
@@codelessunlimited7701 private entities are predominantly the ones erecting those megastructures..and are built as Mixed- Condominiums,Retail & Office Towers.
A tall iconic building can be another tourist spot. Just look at Petronas Tower of Malaysia, Taipei 101 of Taiwan, Skytree of Japan, Burj Al Arab of Dubai. These super tall structure attract a lot of tourists. People in power just lack vision and political will.
Bkit sa europe myroon bang pinakamataas na building? Ang kailangan ng pinas malinis wlang squatter,walng spaghetti at maganda ang mga road🌴🌴🌴🌲🌲🚅🚄🚐🚎🚌 lalo ang public transport😀
skyscraper doesnt define how country is rich, even the philippines is home of the largest and most iconic malls in the world so that would be they considered as a rich?
It's good to have a landmark that will challenge Grand Hyatt Manila in terms of supertall status. And we really need a supertall skyscraper to be a tourist spot that will define not only the Metro but also the country as a whole.
@@dindohaducana4398 buhay ang tourism sa Dubai because of its skyscrapers not of its beaches. wala ngang beach sa metro manila kaya nga naghahanap ng supertall. isa ka pa.
I agree. They need to build affordable housing so the squatters can be relocated there for better life. Help the poor first. They have enough tall buildings
I prefer seeing walkable streets, better mass transport, better housing, parks and more trees, green buildings, and redeveloping wasted lands or squatters area than developing untouch land or mountains. 😌😌😌
Exactly. And it's all about quality, safety, order, cleanliness, good access to quality services, better infrastructure, etc. Even just looking at Paris. They preserved the historic buildings and tall skyscrapers aren't needed to attract tourists. Similar to many European cities. I think European cities are more ideal to emulate, rather than North American and some East Asian cities. They have it down when it comes to proper high-density urban spaces, walkable cities, green spaces, services that are easily reachable on foot/public transportation, etc.
@@GaryHField kasi lawak ang space nila tapos walang katao tao, sino gagamit ng mga iyan, baka sa isang 100 storey building eh kasya na buong populasyon ng city nila .
I am glad that none of those proposed towers were built. From a design perspective, they maybe iconic but downright ugly except for the proposed Icone Tower. I could see these structure built in North Korea for example but not in Metro Manila. Stunning and iconic skyscrapers are those found in Dubai, Doha, New York, London, and Hongkong.
True. "Iconic" doesn't necessarily have to be super tall. It's more like a really unique design that sets it apart from the rest. It becomes the identity of a place, country, or city. A great example would be the Pyramid at the Louvre Museum in Paris, designed by I.M.Pei.
They're found in Chicago where the first one was made. The phillipines doesn't need a megatall tower. Its showcase is the natural beauty of how it exists the mountains, jungles and beaches, and the beauty of the people of the phillipines. Most of the mountains are taller than 1000ft anyways. Is it really neccessary ... Chicago is still an influential world city, and does not have a megatall. Focus the rest of the building initiatives on finishing up or completing the rest of the country's interconnecting infrastructure. Building only one building for the sake of only rich ppl who will use it because they will be the only ones such a building would serve, is not a smart or senseful idea. Create the infrastructure neccessary to handle the traffic. If phillipines wants to continue to improve by utilizing western techniques it needs to create the infrastructure neccessary to cut down on traffic and tagal or wasted time. Gotta not only build, but hustle behind it too. People visit the phillipines for a vacation on the beach or hiking the mountains for a view because its cheap. Not because they want to stand in line for an hour to go take a couple pics with the dusit thani sign behind them lol. Travelers, if you want a tall view, go to people's park in the sky in tagaytay city. Its an observation post ontop of a mountain. You can see the taal volcano rising from the water in the distance, surrounded by beaches islands mountains and jungle. Very unique landscape only found in a few places, but the phillipines does it best. And its affordable
@@gbknowledgeinfo9047 Hey mate...I tned to disagree. The Shard in Southwark comes to mind. Go to London often enough to see how the skyline is slowly changing.
If the Philippines can build superstructure bridges that wil connect all its 7k plus islands, then Philippines will be in the Guinness book of world record that no one can defeat.
We have regular typhoons and earthquake here, beside tall buildings is just a showcase of grandstanding, pride and ego we must be realistic about what we really need, We need thousand of mid rise and high rise housing units to solve our cancerous basic shelter problem.
Sa ngayon dapat ay improve muna natin ang transport system mga roads, bridges, at sky ways natin pati pag build ng more railways sa bansa. Paunlarin ang mga Cities sa mga province para di na lahat siksikan sa NCR. Mag likha ng maraming trabaho at tulungan ang mga mahihirap na umayos ayos ang buhay. Pag build din ng mga tulay na mag connect sa mga pulo ng bansa natin. Maayos at malinis na kalsada at pati malinis ang mga ilog sa cities pati pag build na maaayos na mga pabahay sa cities para wala nang mga squatters. Bunos nalang ang mga super tall buildings sa bansa natin na pwede ipag malaki sa mundo.
if prosperity is the goal....,build bridges or link all the islands not skyscrapers.....or more airports thats the big problem between islands.....transportation ....logistics...
Cities with iconic skyscrapers like Taipei, Kuala Lumpur, Tokyo, Dubai, New York have good adequate public housings. It would be very disturbing and unfitting to see a costly skyscraper in Metro Manila while millions dont have adequate homes (squatter areas). Address needed urban services first before jumping to costly decorations!
Here in Nuvali we dont need high rise sh1t buildings because we enjoy the beauty of the natural landscapes and we can accomodate business offices without building such. The foreign investors dont need sh1t tall buildings here. They also enjoy the natural landscapes here. Its good that the developers and landowners prohibits high rise structures in Nuvali and is a good law implenented here.
we need to be self-sufficient in food. we are currently importing rice, sugar, fish, vegetables, even salt. Cheap and abundant supply of food will make Filipinos happy not seeing tall buildings around we do not own.
Exactly. At bakit why are we importing rice sa Vietnam when we should be exporting rice worldwide to Europe, south America and USA. Filipinos may not own big tall buildings downtown, pero, some familes do have many lands, rice farms and plantations. Why cant the phillipines be the #1 exporter of rice and exotic fruits to the rest of the world? Illinois sells its soybeans n corn worldwide and its only 1 measly state. Why cant the phillipines
if anything, build multiple medium-sized apartment buildings that will ACTUALLY get filled instead of some half-empty vanity tower where the other half only the absurdly rich 1% can afford.
Heaven forbid Intramuros and the old Spanish part of Manila (and the other old Spanish style cities established during the Spanish era) be torn down for gigantic skyscrapers. Many European cities dont even have skyscrapers in their downtowns (Paris is a perfect example).
building high towers is not suitable in the philippines, we are a land of typhoons and earthquakes. why not invest fixing problems like water shortage,garbage disposal system, renewable energy and greener phils? that what makes more filipino proud.
The Philippines and Japan share the threat of natural disasters such as earthquakes and typhoons. Also, Japan has only two supertall buildings, and until this year, there was not a single supertall building in Tokyo.
We need more connectivity to each other with better roads & trains, no more power lines above ground with no brown outs, super speed internet everywhere, but NO SKYSCRAPERS
Yes, We really need to Fast-Track the Construction of Manila's Rapid Transit, if I become Mayor, I will do a Major Fast-Tracking, by Encouraging Construction Companies to Use Prefabs, and 3D Printing.
I've heard that since early 2000. PH was bared to construct super tall buildings because of the location fo the airport. Taguig BGC has building height limit too, and also PH is prone to disasters like the supertyphoons and earthquake. Theres a reason JAPAN doesnt build skycrapers even though they are very good in technology its too risky knowing they just have experience huge earthquakes. I want the PH to build a big staidum instead like an olympic stadium with a capacity of 100k.
Philippines is still developing to be a economic power by 2040. no need for tall buildings, landmark yet. Remember We slept for 30 years of no progress during the aquino and yellow dark ages. So we could have been economic power earlier. PBBM and PRRD are fixing our problem and recovering fast
iconic suoertall is to be constructed by private entity why people here are complaining about it and suggesting better Infra proj instead , eh si govt ang gagawa nyan hindi si private. si govt pa nga makikinabang sa impact ng suoertall
We don't need supertall buildings....what the PHILIPPINES needs is Modern RAILWAYS,AIRPORTS,SEAPORT, BRIDGE'S a public TRANSPORTATION, and good ROADS for a better connectivity in the whole archipelago.And if I may add something power plants so we can have lower electricity rates and for our energy security in a booming economy like the 🇵🇭👍
Look at these examples:Australia with Sydney Opera House and Taj Mahal of India. These infrastructures are not the tallest but popular. The Philippines can have ICONIC Building that doesn't need to be supertall. I would like to have in the country a Statue of Diversity like the Statue of Liberty in America.
A super tall building with a small building foot print is more environmentally friendly than a 3 to 4 story building with a very huge building foot print. Look at HongKong, they manage to maintain and preserve 70 percent of their forest since their own government limits the urban development to a maximum of only 30 percent of the total area of HongKong.
Europe isnt that rich... They look rich coz they have very low population thats why GDP per capita is high there... And people are well educated thats it
@@dantesalazar7805 where big population bro... They are just 300 million... If india and china had 300 million population then they both countries would be more rich and powerfull that USA... its just a game of poplation... Otherwise china and india would have more GDP per capita than western countries 😇
You hv to be mindful about earthquakes. The taller the structure the higher the centre of gravity. So it becomes unstable. I think taipei 101 is a risk for taiwan as there are earthquakes in taiwan too. Same with jakarta.
so sad no super tall building in my country😰😰 cose all cancelled of more reason, no1 reason is corruption and high elec bill.. hope no longger have it in cebu, Iloilo, or davao🙄👍💪🙏
i dont find tall buildings appealing since they only blocks view. for example, italy ,france and germany japan have gorgeous and modern cities, but none of them have super tall buildings. im oppose to giant concrete rectangular structure as it proves that to be a modern city , it doesnt have to have mega tall building.
also many people like to saw ph's tallest skyscrapers soon like the Burj Khalifa in dubai that has an world record in doing that.Iam also designing 2 skyscrapers(i am still G8) filipinos are good in designing ,hmm...what if their will be a megatall/supertall building in any part of the philippines.
Kapag natapos na Ang New Manila Airport at natuloy Ang Sangley Airport pwede na isara Ang NAIA at idevelop kagaya ng ginawa sa old airport sa Makati noon. Napakalawak na space nun maliban na Lang kung gamitin ng air force Yung property kasi nandun lang sa tabi ng NAIA Ang Villamor Airbase.
We need industries and jobs, so that after 25 years I can go home. Wait until the next big earthquake. It's been 25 years since the last earthquake. That's the way to know the buildings are structurally sound.
I mean, they are difficult to construct. Or send 20-40 construction workers to complete it in just 5 years. We just need world-class roads and transportation. I don't know if it will have the top spot for the tallest building in the world.
From what I know, height restrictions are imposed on buildings in Metro Manila due the natural disasters and the proximity to the airport. In my opinion super tall skyscrapers may look cool, but a lot of them lay empty because no one wants to rent their spaces. This is commonly seen in places like the Middle East, particularly in Dubai and as also in China as well. They are going to be waste of money and resources if no one rent and occupy them.
We don't need a supertall skyscraper. Our country still has a lot of cities that need development. Better focus on spreading investments in other cities
Even without, Philippines economy is growing by leaps n bounds, growing more than some of its ASEAN counterparts... take los angeles for example. A city known worldwide, but it has maybe only 1 or 2 buildings barely over 1000ft like the phillipines Hyatt. Yet almost a third of California population and industrial output comes from la county... Manila is also like that.... but has 10 million more ppl in less than half the size of los angeles
@@devinatompong4765 Metro Manila (BGC, Makati city, Pasig city etc..) have a lots of incredible modern tall buildings that beat skycrapper of KL, Jakarta, Bangkok,Hanoi, ho chi minhi ok?
Nah, we don't need such tall buildings. Never in a quadrillion years. The country can still rise in some other ways that's for sure. Uniqueness always kills the giants, if you know what I mean that is.
imagine, being able to personally witnessed those proposed towers since Centennial Tower and after 20 years wala ni isang naipatayo? that even Grand Hyatt is said to be not 318m but rather a 280M up to the pinnacle, is such disappointment. But, the author did not mentioned that there is a height restriction of only 250meters for a high-rise to be built in Metro Manila. That is why no proposed towers higher than 250m were ever materialized (250m up to the roof) Grand Hyatt is 250m up to the roof and 30m spire. Other example is Trump tower was supposed to be 280m pero ayun, kapantay lang ng gramercy. The Park central was proposed to be 270m pero nag top off na mas mataas pa ang Discovery Primea. Let us see with the Estate Makati kung matutupad ang pangakong 280m nito.
Pag natapos na ang New Manila Intl Airport and Sangley Intl Airport, isasara na ang NAIA at icoconvert into business district. Pwede nang literal na sky's the limit ang labanan.
@@kennethcananua77716 I think nor fabros is not Filipino! maybe nor is from other Southeast Asian country. They pronounce and spell Philippines without S
makati and bgc are world class. we dont need super skyscraper. what we need is a cultural tourist destination. like intramuros and binondo restore the old look and develop the area.
It might look good but not much for anything else. Just look at what happened to Dubai, too many vanity projects but didn't make it a more livable and comfy place. And almost all Philippine cities haven't even covered basic urban infrastructure.
i have dream we build like tallest building in the Pilippines likeFreedom tower / One World Trade Center or Petronas Tower ..soon Manila Airport will transfer there is a chance for Supertall Building
The Philippines don't meed to build high rise buildings over 60 - 70 stories high....what the Philippines need are iconic designed buildings that are world class..
PH dont need high or super tall buildings. Filipinos need world class roads and transport system.
I agree. Plus, I'd rather see the Philippines as greener, cleaner, and more orderly. There's no point having supertall buildings when there are still squatters living in squalor in other parts of the city. It's just a "yabang" point that we should and could not afford - yet.
A super tall building with a small building foot print is more environmentally friendly than a 3 to 4 story building with a very huge building foot print. Look at HongKong, they manage to maintain and preserve 70 percent of their forest since their own government limits the urban development to a maximum of only 30 percent of the total area of HongKong.
@@moymoythehappymonkey3155 That's true BUT the Philippine land situation is hardly comparable to Hongkong's. At any rate, that's what has been done at BGC and other business centers but would hardly apply to most parts of the Philippines.
@@s.t.santos5928 probably Puerto Prinsesa might be the way to build such a big megatall building
What’s about food?
As of now we don't need super tall buildings. We need to improve the transportation specially trains and bridges to connect all the province from Luzon, Visayas and Mindanao.. And also if posible to connect Sabah. We need more investors here in the Philippines and lowering the electricity
Philippines doesn't belong in top 10 in terms of the world's super tall buildings, but try to look their Shopping Malls and indoor Arenas. You'll be surprise. And for me it's for practical to first prioritize those kind of buildings than to have a super luxury supertall super iconic super expensive buildings.
Shopping Malls and indoor arenas are far more flexible and plenty of use compare to supertall iconic towers. 😅
(just my opinion).
well, sabah should still belong to malaysia bevause if you look at it in every angle, sabah is still malaysia. malaysia has far more GDP PER CAPITA than philippines. use google to learn
No need to compete the important is cleanliness and discipline.
skyline is not about the tallest. it about uniqueness
But not even In skyline race...PH is losing in Cleanliness, road and other infrastructure too compared to other country...
Yes,clean and hospitality.
Sir saakin lang Po to idea ha wag Kang Magalit pero pwede Po ba lahat cleanliness discipline at tower? Hehe Kasi naiingit ako sa iBang bansa bansa may nga tower Sila at mga iconic Po .. kaya as a millennial that's one of my dream to my country na magkaroo. Talaga Po Ng Isang iconic tower Ang pinas hehe my own idea lang po
@@christianstv8354pasyal ka sa ayala makati, bgc taguig, eton centris qc,Ortigas center, ilo-ilo mega world business area, cebu city cdo
Philippines need to solve the wires everywhere, maintain clean road, solve the corruption,
Correct. All that hairball mess of electrical wires is a firehazard and unhealthy to live under.
Yes, Before having Supertall Skyscrapers, we must Prioritize the Welfare of every 110M Filipinos, such by Cracking Down on Corruption, Educating all Filipinos to Discipline like the Japanese, and Singaporeans, building at least 10 Lines of MRT/LRT in Metro Manila by 2030, and more.
Kaya dapat si Robredo nanalo kasi nasa economic plan niya dapat transparent lahat ng pulitiko sa pera nila. Eh kaso si Marcos nanalo and ayaw niya ipakita mga wealth ng mga kasama niyang corrupt 😂
@@ainsleyfrastructurekpopmashupsit's better to build buildings with businesses in the provinces
No, we don't need supertall skyscrapers. Just an iconic landmark, like Sydney Opera House. Doesn't have to be tall. It just needs to be unique, iconic and Filipino - ish structure.
That's a bad investments. Sydney Opera House is an expensive fancy building.
You don't believe me, read: Sydney Australia's iconic Opera House is actually a study in a project failure. Its original plan had a four-year timetable and an AU $7 million budget, but in the end, it took AU $102 million and 14 years to complete.
And who told you that Philippines don't need a supertall building? I doubt you are not a Filipino and Philippine improvement will hurt you because of jealousy
@@rurallifemindanao7423 who told you it needs one?
@@codelessunlimited7701 you took it literally dude.
@@braunx1080 of course we Filipinos..fyi think and analyze having a very tall and iconic building it can improve our tourism industry..every building made there is a purpose and add improvement to a country. And who told you its not needed? You? That no analysis?
Phillipines Grow Grow Grow👍🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭
ua-cam.com/video/tuQqnRzkebI/v-deo.html
More like Fail, Fail, Fail.
@@Spy359 Iiyak mo yan HAHAHAHA
@@Spy359 iyak iyak iyak ka naman dyan 🤣
@@حظنل Hahahahah! 😪 Kawawang Pilipinas.
Marina Bay Sands of SIngapore, THe Shards, The Gherkin & Walkie Talkie of London, Sydney opera house, & Burj Al Arab are not famous because of their height but because of their "UNIQUE" design so for the PHilippines, I prefer to have an outstanding, out of this world designed skyscaper rather than a super-tall one.
Yea and usually these iconic buildings doesn't make money and costed so much taxpayers money.
Philippines doesn't belong in top 10 in terms of the world's super tall buildings, but try to look their Shopping Malls and indoor Arenas. You'll be surprise. And for me it's more practical to first prioritize those kind of buildings than to have a super luxury supertall super iconic super expensive buildings.
Shopping Malls and indoor arenas are far more flexible and plenty of use compare to supertall iconic towers. 😅
(just my opinion).
Bingo!
@@codelessunlimited7701 uh? Marina bay sands-most famous casino hotel in SG, all these London skyscrapers are privately owned which caters international banking and insurance companies, & the sydney opera house is always fully-booked showcasing Aussie's international acclaimed classical & cultural shows....
@@codelessunlimited7701 private entities are predominantly the ones erecting those megastructures..and are built as Mixed- Condominiums,Retail & Office Towers.
A tall iconic building can be another tourist spot. Just look at Petronas Tower of Malaysia, Taipei 101 of Taiwan, Skytree of Japan, Burj Al Arab of Dubai. These super tall structure attract a lot of tourists.
People in power just lack vision and political will.
Bkit sa europe myroon bang pinakamataas na building? Ang kailangan ng pinas malinis wlang squatter,walng spaghetti at maganda ang mga road🌴🌴🌴🌲🌲🚅🚄🚐🚎🚌 lalo ang public transport😀
Meron na po sa london modern and glassy tall building
skyscraper doesnt define how country is rich, even the philippines is home of the largest and most iconic malls in the world so that would be they considered as a rich?
Its a part od the economy
Maganda yan pre para mas sisikat pa bansa natin at dadami tourista
It's good to have a landmark that will challenge Grand Hyatt Manila in terms of supertall status. And we really need a supertall skyscraper to be a tourist spot that will define not only the Metro but also the country as a whole.
Isa ka pa, ang mga beaches ang tourists' destination hnd skycrapers....
@@dindohaducana4398 buhay ang tourism sa Dubai because of its skyscrapers not of its beaches. wala ngang beach sa metro manila kaya nga naghahanap ng supertall. isa ka pa.
I agree. They need to build affordable housing so the squatters can be relocated there for better life. Help the poor first. They have enough tall buildings
I prefer seeing walkable streets, better mass transport, better housing, parks and more trees, green buildings, and redeveloping wasted lands or squatters area than developing untouch land or mountains. 😌😌😌
We can try putting supertall buildings in the New Clark City or Clark Global City. This is a little bit dangerous in Manila or Cebu.
Might take more time, New Clark City today has few buildings
i am from indonesia
we asean country doesnt need high rise building.. because our land has so many earthquake..
Hiyang hiya naman ang mga European countries 😁 hindi naman pataasan ang labanan😁
Totoo po. Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, etc. Wala yan silang mga supertall buildings.
@@GaryHField ประเทศเจริญไม่ใด้วัดกันที่ตึกสูง
Exactly. And it's all about quality, safety, order, cleanliness, good access to quality services, better infrastructure, etc. Even just looking at Paris. They preserved the historic buildings and tall skyscrapers aren't needed to attract tourists. Similar to many European cities. I think European cities are more ideal to emulate, rather than North American and some East Asian cities. They have it down when it comes to proper high-density urban spaces, walkable cities, green spaces, services that are easily reachable on foot/public transportation, etc.
@@GaryHField kasi lawak ang space nila tapos walang katao tao, sino gagamit ng mga iyan, baka sa isang 100 storey building eh kasya na buong populasyon ng city nila .
I am glad that none of those proposed towers were built. From a design perspective, they maybe iconic but downright ugly except for the proposed Icone Tower. I could see these structure built in North Korea for example but not in Metro Manila. Stunning and iconic skyscrapers are those found in Dubai, Doha, New York, London, and Hongkong.
True. "Iconic" doesn't necessarily have to be super tall. It's more like a really unique design that sets it apart from the rest. It becomes the identity of a place, country, or city. A great example would be the Pyramid at the Louvre Museum in Paris, designed by I.M.Pei.
They're found in Chicago where the first one was made. The phillipines doesn't need a megatall tower. Its showcase is the natural beauty of how it exists the mountains, jungles and beaches, and the beauty of the people of the phillipines. Most of the mountains are taller than 1000ft anyways. Is it really neccessary ... Chicago is still an influential world city, and does not have a megatall. Focus the rest of the building initiatives on finishing up or completing the rest of the country's interconnecting infrastructure. Building only one building for the sake of only rich ppl who will use it because they will be the only ones such a building would serve, is not a smart or senseful idea. Create the infrastructure neccessary to handle the traffic. If phillipines wants to continue to improve by utilizing western techniques it needs to create the infrastructure neccessary to cut down on traffic and tagal or wasted time. Gotta not only build, but hustle behind it too. People visit the phillipines for a vacation on the beach or hiking the mountains for a view because its cheap. Not because they want to stand in line for an hour to go take a couple pics with the dusit thani sign behind them lol. Travelers, if you want a tall view, go to people's park in the sky in tagaytay city. Its an observation post ontop of a mountain. You can see the taal volcano rising from the water in the distance, surrounded by beaches islands mountains and jungle. Very unique landscape only found in a few places, but the phillipines does it best. And its affordable
Bro london dont have sky scrapers 😁
@@gbknowledgeinfo9047 Hey mate...I tned to disagree. The Shard in Southwark comes to mind. Go to London often enough to see how the skyline is slowly changing.
@@gbknowledgeinfo9047 what do you call the shard, its a skyscraper in London
If the Philippines can build superstructure bridges that wil connect all its 7k plus islands, then Philippines will be in the Guinness book of world record that no one can defeat.
dunno why some thinks that skyscrapers are useless, they're not! Like any infrastructure, they are economic drivers!
We have regular typhoons and earthquake here, beside tall buildings is just a showcase of grandstanding, pride and ego we must be realistic about what we really need, We need thousand of mid rise and high rise housing units to solve our cancerous basic shelter problem.
So happy that CDO is also featured here. One of the most promising city from Mindanao.
Congratulations to the Philippines in 2022❤❤❤❤
Philippines sets in the Pacific Ring of Fire...frequented with typhoons and earthquakes. I think , Tall building is not practical to build.
Ganoon din naman ang Japan.
Wishing the best for the Phillipines from Malaysia, but functional architecture always beats vanity projects. Fancy skyscrapers don't mean anything.
Yeah you are right, and the creator of this content is stupid....
TRAINS is rising in the Philippines. Just saw the structures going to clark
Sa ngayon dapat ay improve muna natin ang transport system mga roads, bridges, at sky ways natin pati pag build ng more railways sa bansa. Paunlarin ang mga Cities sa mga province para di na lahat siksikan sa NCR. Mag likha ng maraming trabaho at tulungan ang mga mahihirap na umayos ayos ang buhay. Pag build din ng mga tulay na mag connect sa mga pulo ng bansa natin. Maayos at malinis na kalsada at pati malinis ang mga ilog sa cities pati pag build na maaayos na mga pabahay sa cities para wala nang mga squatters. Bunos nalang ang mga super tall buildings sa bansa natin na pwede ipag malaki sa mundo.
We're always last, lost and least when it comes to everything. We are even surpassed by Vietnam, Cambodia, or Nigeria.
After the New Manila International Airport is finished in Bulacan, close that airport in Manila and build the tall tower in that site.
if prosperity is the goal....,build bridges or link all the islands not skyscrapers.....or more airports thats the big problem between islands.....transportation ....logistics...
I think it's better to enhance RoRo in order to access islands rather than bridges. We are an archipelago so we should have boats not roads.
Cities with iconic skyscrapers like Taipei, Kuala Lumpur, Tokyo, Dubai, New York have good adequate public housings. It would be very disturbing and unfitting to see a costly skyscraper in Metro Manila while millions dont have adequate homes (squatter areas). Address needed urban services first before jumping to costly decorations!
Here in Nuvali we dont need high rise sh1t buildings because we enjoy the beauty of the natural landscapes and we can accomodate business offices without building such. The foreign investors dont need sh1t tall buildings here. They also enjoy the natural landscapes here. Its good that the developers and landowners prohibits high rise structures in Nuvali and is a good law implenented here.
we need to be self-sufficient in food. we are currently importing rice, sugar, fish, vegetables, even salt. Cheap and abundant supply of food will make Filipinos happy not seeing tall buildings around we do not own.
Exactly. At bakit why are we importing rice sa Vietnam when we should be exporting rice worldwide to Europe, south America and USA. Filipinos may not own big tall buildings downtown, pero, some familes do have many lands, rice farms and plantations. Why cant the phillipines be the #1 exporter of rice and exotic fruits to the rest of the world? Illinois sells its soybeans n corn worldwide and its only 1 measly state. Why cant the phillipines
So true. I have gone to BGC and Makati, and all the tall buildings will make you feel left out.
other factor is that the Philippines are an archipelagic country and lots of airports.
if anything, build multiple medium-sized apartment buildings that will ACTUALLY get filled instead of some half-empty vanity tower where the other half only the absurdly rich 1% can afford.
Heaven forbid Intramuros and the old Spanish part of Manila (and the other old Spanish style cities established during the Spanish era) be torn down for gigantic skyscrapers. Many European cities dont even have skyscrapers in their downtowns (Paris is a perfect example).
Bat naman sisirain ang Intramuros? Intramuros is an important part of history. Kung may babaguhin, siguro yung others parts ng Manila City na lang
building high towers is not suitable in the philippines, we are a land of typhoons and earthquakes. why not invest fixing problems like water shortage,garbage disposal system, renewable energy and greener phils? that what makes more filipino proud.
The Philippines and Japan share the threat of natural disasters such as earthquakes and typhoons. Also, Japan has only two supertall buildings, and until this year, there was not a single supertall building in Tokyo.
3:12 how did they get this 3D map?
I think they screen recorded it
We need more connectivity to each other with better roads & trains, no more power lines above ground with no brown outs, super speed internet everywhere, but NO SKYSCRAPERS
Yes, We really need to Fast-Track the Construction of Manila's Rapid Transit, if I become Mayor, I will do a Major Fast-Tracking, by Encouraging Construction Companies to Use Prefabs, and 3D Printing.
I dont care about supertall bldg..we need more train.
I've heard that since early 2000. PH was bared to construct super tall buildings because of the location fo the airport. Taguig BGC has building height limit too, and also PH is prone to disasters like the supertyphoons and earthquake. Theres a reason JAPAN doesnt build skycrapers even though they are very good in technology its too risky knowing they just have experience huge earthquakes. I want the PH to build a big staidum instead like an olympic stadium with a capacity of 100k.
The Pacific Ring of Fire says: “ge, go lang” 😈
PHILIPINES IS A SOARING HIGH
We don't need a High Sky scrapers we need more dreams and action to develop our country.!!!!! Shout out from Abu Dhabi UAE.!!!!!(
No need for a supertall.
Take out those spaghetti wires, more subway lines, zero squatters: these things are necessity NOW. Not a Supertall.
Kailan kaya talaga magkakaroon ng iconic supertall ang pelepenz?
Pag may pampagawa ka na
@@BINI_Maloi_Colet tama
s🐽n
a tall skyscraper is useless if there is not enough open parks or greenspaces infront of it.
we need more trees and parks to improve our air quality
Philippines is still developing to be a economic power by 2040. no need for tall buildings, landmark yet. Remember We slept for 30 years of no progress during the aquino and yellow dark ages. So we could have been economic power earlier. PBBM and PRRD are fixing our problem and recovering fast
iconic suoertall is to be constructed by private entity why people here are complaining about it and suggesting better Infra proj instead , eh si govt ang gagawa nyan hindi si private.
si govt pa nga makikinabang sa impact ng suoertall
PH only needs one significant tallest building that embodies the soul of the city and country.
We don't need supertall buildings....what the PHILIPPINES needs is Modern RAILWAYS,AIRPORTS,SEAPORT, BRIDGE'S a public TRANSPORTATION, and good ROADS for a better connectivity in the whole archipelago.And if I may add something power plants so we can have lower electricity rates and for our energy security in a booming economy like the 🇵🇭👍
MAKE THE ICONE TOWER THE TALLEST IN THE PHILIPPINES 🇵🇭 👈 💥 💥 💥
Look at these examples:Australia with Sydney Opera House and Taj Mahal of India. These infrastructures are not the tallest but popular. The Philippines can have ICONIC Building that doesn't need to be supertall. I would like to have in the country a Statue of Diversity like the Statue of Liberty in America.
Sydney opera house and the like might be a government project but tall building are built by business people for their business interest.
Daming comment na Ayaw talaga sa pag unlad ng bansa. Bakit Kaya ganun mindset ng mga Filipino. ? Pa atras lagi
But the Philippines lagged behind in these 3 vital sectors: Manufacturing, Energy Production and Agriculture
Energy Production and Agriculture pwede pa masulosyunan pero yung Manufacturing di natin yan kaya, sobrang mahal sa Pinas 😂
Europe doesn't have super tall building most of it are old European non glass style but they are rich.
A super tall building with a small building foot print is more environmentally friendly than a 3 to 4 story building with a very huge building foot print. Look at HongKong, they manage to maintain and preserve 70 percent of their forest since their own government limits the urban development to a maximum of only 30 percent of the total area of HongKong.
@@moymoythehappymonkey3155 boysit
Europe isnt that rich... They look rich coz they have very low population thats why GDP per capita is high there... And people are well educated thats it
@@gbknowledgeinfo9047 why america big population,but most powerful
@@dantesalazar7805 where big population bro... They are just 300 million... If india and china had 300 million population then they both countries would be more rich and powerfull that USA... its just a game of poplation... Otherwise china and india would have more GDP per capita than western countries 😇
Informative good content.
We need more super structure BRIDGES between Luzon to Visayas to Mindanao.
You hv to be mindful about earthquakes. The taller the structure the higher the centre of gravity. So it becomes unstable. I think taipei 101 is a risk for taiwan as there are earthquakes in taiwan too. Same with jakarta.
so sad no super tall building in my country😰😰 cose all cancelled of more reason, no1 reason is corruption and high elec bill.. hope no longger have it in cebu, Iloilo, or davao🙄👍💪🙏
ipa tuloy bayan idol sa iconic tower baka hindi yan tuloy😓🤔🤔🤔🙏🙏🙏🙏
the ddt skytower will soon to be built and it will stand at 280m
That's right. Who cares about tall buildings. You need great roads, efficient rail system, seaports, etc.
Very nice explanation
Meron naman taung supetall a. Grand Hyatt sa BGC is 318 meters tall.
Only spire antenna not floor 250m floor height
Just wait and see there will be more BGCs to come here in the country God blessed 😊👍
i dont find tall buildings appealing since they only blocks view. for example, italy ,france and germany japan have gorgeous and modern cities, but none of them have super tall buildings. im oppose to giant concrete rectangular structure as it proves that to be a modern city , it doesnt have to have mega tall building.
also many people like to saw ph's tallest skyscrapers soon like the Burj Khalifa in dubai that has an world record in doing that.Iam also designing 2 skyscrapers(i am still G8)
filipinos are good in designing ,hmm...what if their will be a megatall/supertall building in any part of the philippines.
With hollow blocks?
Princesa Tower and the SJS Maritime Empire could potentially be the provincial-level supertall buildings.
An iconic building can boost tourism..
Kapag natapos na Ang New Manila Airport at natuloy Ang Sangley Airport pwede na isara Ang NAIA at idevelop kagaya ng ginawa sa old airport sa Makati noon. Napakalawak na space nun maliban na Lang kung gamitin ng air force Yung property kasi nandun lang sa tabi ng NAIA Ang Villamor Airbase.
Running down the stairs from 17th floor during an earthquake is bad enough already.
We need industries and jobs, so that after 25 years I can go home. Wait until the next big earthquake. It's been 25 years since the last earthquake. That's the way to know the buildings are structurally sound.
I mean, they are difficult to construct. Or send 20-40 construction workers to complete it in just 5 years. We just need world-class roads and transportation. I don't know if it will have the top spot for the tallest building in the world.
Keep me posted. Thanks
How about both?
Philippines go go go go
jeddah tower was already abandoned.. there is new site of development in saudi the neon city
neom city not neon, in the province of tabuk
From what I know, height restrictions are imposed on buildings in Metro Manila due the natural disasters and the proximity to the airport.
In my opinion super tall skyscrapers may look cool, but a lot of them lay empty because no one wants to rent their spaces. This is commonly seen in places like the Middle East, particularly in Dubai and as also in China as well. They are going to be waste of money and resources if no one rent and occupy them.
no way SMC or Ayala or Pangilan group wont compete on the tallest building in the philippines
We don't need a supertall skyscraper. Our country still has a lot of cities that need development. Better focus on spreading investments in other cities
There have super tall buildings in Philippines you can find it in Makati City & BGC, The Philippines skycrapper is incredible.
Haha dwarf building compare in asean especially in kuala lumpur and vietnam above 400m
Even without, Philippines economy is growing by leaps n bounds, growing more than some of its ASEAN counterparts... take los angeles for example. A city known worldwide, but it has maybe only 1 or 2 buildings barely over 1000ft like the phillipines Hyatt. Yet almost a third of California population and industrial output comes from la county... Manila is also like that.... but has 10 million more ppl in less than half the size of los angeles
@@devinatompong4765 Metro Manila (BGC, Makati city, Pasig city etc..) have a lots of incredible modern tall buildings that beat skycrapper of KL, Jakarta, Bangkok,Hanoi, ho chi minhi ok?
For safety purpose we dont need so much high buildings because we are earthquake prone,we are located in the Pacific Ring of Fire
I don't know pagcor tower will be office or residential
Filipinos need more work.
Nah, we don't need such tall buildings. Never in a quadrillion years.
The country can still rise in some other ways that's for sure. Uniqueness always kills the giants, if you know what I mean that is.
imagine, being able to personally witnessed those proposed towers since Centennial Tower and after 20 years wala ni isang naipatayo? that even Grand Hyatt is said to be not 318m but rather a 280M up to the pinnacle, is such disappointment. But, the author did not mentioned that there is a height restriction of only 250meters for a high-rise to be built in Metro Manila. That is why no proposed towers higher than 250m were ever materialized (250m up to the roof) Grand Hyatt is 250m up to the roof and 30m spire. Other example is Trump tower was supposed to be 280m pero ayun, kapantay lang ng gramercy. The Park central was proposed to be 270m pero nag top off na mas mataas pa ang Discovery Primea. Let us see with the Estate Makati kung matutupad ang pangakong 280m nito.
Pag natapos na ang New Manila Intl Airport and Sangley Intl Airport, isasara na ang NAIA at icoconvert into business district. Pwede nang literal na sky's the limit ang labanan.
Philippine is in the ring of fire so it's not afflicable to build high rise building
Japan also is in the ring of fire along with Taiwan and Indonesia! these countries has the tallest building in Asia
filipino? Or Filipino?
@@jackjohn8246 Filipino for a human pilipino for the language
@@kennethcananua77716 I think nor fabros is not Filipino! maybe nor is from other Southeast Asian country. They pronounce and spell Philippines without S
makati and bgc are world class. we dont need super skyscraper. what we need is a cultural tourist destination. like intramuros and binondo restore the old look and develop the area.
We don't need tall towers, what we need are healthy citizenry, educated people, good infrastructure for transportation and mobility
It might look good but not much for anything else. Just look at what happened to Dubai, too many vanity projects but didn't make it a more livable and comfy place.
And almost all Philippine cities haven't even covered basic urban infrastructure.
BASTA MGA PINOY ANG NAG PLANO PURO DRAWING AT PANAGINIP LANG
i have dream we build like tallest building in the Pilippines likeFreedom tower / One World Trade Center or Petronas Tower ..soon Manila Airport will transfer there is a chance for Supertall Building
Philippines has a huge and beautiful skyline but no urban planning for residentials.
We don't have to do it, Philippines is earthquake prone.
Going business in Cebu, Davao,,Pampanga, including Bacolod city will surely drive the economy rather than a super structural building
The Philippines don't meed to build high rise buildings over 60 - 70 stories high....what the Philippines need are iconic designed buildings that are world class..
According to future cities 20 countries with more skyscrapers phils ahead of singapore, thailand and indonesia on the number of skyscrapers.