Sennheiser XSW-D Review: Simple Wireless Lavalier Microphone System for Solo Shooters
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 сер 2024
- Sennheiser XSW-D Portable Lavalier Set at B&H Photo: bhpho.to/2IM0RUD
In this episode, we take an in-depth look at Sennheiser’s new entry level digital wireless microphone system, the XSW-D. In particular, we put the portable lavalier set to the test. The XSW-D is made to be as simple to use as a cable, according to Sennheiser. And based on our tests, we agree.
The transmitter and receiver are very small, include in-built batteries with over 5 hours of powering time, and there’s only a single button so you don’t have to fuss with a bunch of settings. Of course, there are trade-offs when you make things this simple, but overall, it seems that Sennheiser has made a winning option for solo video shooters and those who don’t know a lot about audio production but want high quality audio.
If you’d like to learn how to make great dialogue audio for your film and video projects, please have a look at my courses at school.learnli... including processing dialogue audio, recording sound, how to use the Zoom F8 and F8n, and how to get the most from the Sound Devices MixPre series of recorders.
Links to gear used in this video:
----------------------------------
Sennheiser XSW-D Wireless Microphone System - all the options, kits, add-on receivers and transmitters
B&H: bhpho.to/2JjmGeC
----------------------------------
TRS to TRRS adapter to run this into a laptop or mobile phone
B&H, Amazon: geni.us/tQ7AeU
----------------------------------
RODELink Filmmaker Kit - this is the set with a transmitter, a receiver, and the RODE Lavalier microphone
B&H: bhpho.to/2ibeQad
----------------------------------
RODELink Wireless Microphone System - all the options, kits, add-on receivers and transmitters
B&H: bhpho.to/2JjPP9z
----------------------------------
Aputure AL-MW LED Light - used as the background light in the talking head shots
Amazon: geni.us/OwJcdHt
B&H: bhpho.to/2ILBUIW
----------------------------------
Aputure COB 120DII LED Light - this is my main workhorse light for 90% of my video work.
Amazon: geni.us/iNVn
B&H: bhpho.to/2T7FtcR
----------------------------------
Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 4K - I used this to record most of this episode
B&H: bhpho.to/2JB7W5V
----------------------------------
Panasonic 12-35mm F/2.8 OIS Lens - Used on the Pocket 4K camera
B&H: bhpho.to/2i6s2gv
----------------------------------
Panasonic GH5
Amazon: geni.us/Efb6r
B&H: bhpho.to/2BcorBk
----------------------------------
Panasonic GH5S
Amazon: geni.us/hnP75j
B&H: bhpho.to/2Cbt6mY
----------------------------------
Copyright 2019 by Curtis Judd
Music Copyright 2019 by Cary Judd. Used with permission.
Ethics statement: Some of the links above are Amazon.com, B&H Photo, or other affiliate links.
![[REVIEW] SENNHEISER XSW-D](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ksyhz0-TlOE/mqdefault.jpg)
The most professional youtuber of this nich, best reviews and advices!
Thanks Rodrigo!
There are some really good and professional UA-camrs out there... But Curtis is definitely one of the tops.
This system works great with my Canon Rebel T5i, but it was gold for me while acting on stage. I needed a small, easy to hide unit with no antenna that could be damage while performing in a play at Cleveland State University. All the other actors were wearing regular wireless mics but my character -a hostage strapped to a chair, was a very physical role being roughed around and getting wet. So I took a chance and ordered a unit. Love it! The transmitter easily hid in a microphone belt on my back under my t-shirt (and under a full business suit on initial scenes) with the mic wire running up behind my neck and pinned just above my forehead's hairline (I have shoulder length hair). The mic worked like a charm and the sound quality was better than the other mics. The unit was on for two and a half hours without any battery problems. Now we are considering getting more units (and hoping for the price to go down) Still, for live stage, I highly recommended it.
Thanks John, great info! Glad to hear it worked so well on stage
You are one of the Best person with Professional approach with great experience, I always wait for ur videos. Lot of Respect Sir.... THANKS
Thanks Dr.Malik Osama Saeed!
Thanks. I've been looking at this and you answered my most important questions.
👍
I, too, wanted to know how much cocoa powder was needed.
1/4 cup, got it!
Perfect timing with the "START CLIPPING!"
😀
Curtis, my ear clearly gives the winner to the Sennheiser over the Rode. The Senn sounds richer and not "echoey" as the Rode does. To me, there is no comparison: the win goes to the Senn. Great review! Much appreciated.
Thanks Roy!
Hi Curtis. Thanks for another informative review. I bought two sets of these a month ago for my church and they have worked well for the last three Sunday services. I got the lavaliere set with the XLR audio out on the receiver because they plug into our mixing board. Problem is, we rent our space for only four hours each Sunday. Everything gets packed away into a box and stored in a self-store garage with no mains power for recharging. My solution for recharging is to purchase a rechargeable power bank so we can pack the four devices plugged into the power bank and they can recharge at their leisure. Each week, when we set up we will plug the power back in so that it recharges during the service.
The Sennheiser Product Information sheet informed me that each device has a 850 mA-hr rated at 3.7 V which is 3145 mW-hr so I'll need a power pack with at least that capacity times four, or 12580 mW-hr . I could keep the two receivers plugged into a charger the whole time they are in use. I don't know if that would keep them fully charged but it would reduce the recharge power overall.
I measured the current a fully-charged receiver consumes when operating as 240 mA at 5 V. That's 1200 mW. A receiver at about half-charge pulled 410 mA when off and charging. When on and charging it pulled 480 mA. I'm not sure I can draw an accurate assessment of how much having them plugged in while in use will extend their battery endurance or reduce their charge consumption from the battery pack.
Oh, they only send one charging cable with a transmitter/receiver set, so you'll have to pick up another cable if you want to change them at the same time, which do.
Sennheiser Product sheet: assets.sennheiser.com/global-downloads/file/11409/SP_1225_v1.1_XS_Wireless_Digital_Lavalier_Set_Product_Specification_EN.pdf
Hi Robert, good idea to use USB Batteries to charge them after service. And good point re: only one included cable - that can create a bit of a recharge bottleneck.
No one covers audio like you! Well done!!!!
Thanks Jay!
So knowledgable, so concise, so practical. Chapeau!
Mercí!
Thank you so much Mr. Judd. I very rarely subscribe to this type of channel but this is the 4th video of yours that I have found to be extremely informative and easy to watch. You are very professional (it is SO refreshing to encounter someone who doesn't think he's a comedian) and I am happy to subscribe. Please keep on producing reviews of this quality.
Thanks so much!
Some of your videos are like good television. I find myself coming back now and then. Thank you.
Thanks!
Great review! Good point about the inability to reduce the output level. Otherwise it looks good, but I'm hesitant to ever buying a device, other than a phone or a USB battery, with a built in non replaceable battery. I once bought some flash triggers from a reputable brand that only saw light use, and after three years the built in battery wouldn't charge anymore. So that was 300 USD worth of "disposable" flash triggers down the drain. A built in battery basically sets an expiration date on the device based on the longevity of the battery - unless the device is so popular that after market battery replacement service is available - like it is for phones. And then there's the challenge of not being able to quickly swap out batteries if the device runs out of power while you're using it - as you already pointed out. I like the size, and I'm sure it's a fine device, but I prefer replaceable batteries.
Great points. Thanks for sharing!
Thanks Curtis! Not sure how you dont have more subscribers, mate. You're one of the most professional for all video-related reviews. :)
Thanks. In part it is because my videos are not “Edu-Tainment” but I’m ok with that! 😀
Haha, first time I ever had the honor of giving the 1k thumbs up. Great vid. Thanks!
Thank you!
Thank you very much! I had to make a quick desition for a two day job with a lot of interviews in a crowded environment at an expo and this just worked perfectly for my needs. I'm in love with your channel.
Glad it worked out well! Thanks!
Thank you for the review, Mr. Judd. Thanks, B&H, for providing it so it can be reviewed by a trusted reviewer.
Thank you, too, huyked!
Nice review, with spot-on counselling about dos and don'ts.
Aside from all technical aspects and features, I see this new product range as a key for non-sound-specialists to step right in good-sounding videos/presentations/mini-gigs, etc.
After years as an actor, I know a thing or two about how to mic a talent, on a set or a stage... and the hassle of it all. But I'm also an entertainer and host/presenter... thus having the "joy" to install / set /adjust / troubleshoot my own soundgear. And boy is it giving me headaches sometimes !!!
I've always managed to get great results, and sometimes was being requested as the good samaritain pulling out collegues from "technical traps". We all know these old venues, shops, theatres, conference halls, event places... where sound system was installed by no-one-knows-who, with some obscure gear, decades-old basic loudspeakers, pinched cables, dusty-crusty amplifiers, karaoke-type mixers, etc. In such places, you can easily lose 2 hours trying to figure where is what, and how to get the thing to sound decent. If ever !
In such places and situations, having to just plug-press-pair-run is more than mind-relaxing. The clever folks at Sennheiser know how to conceive gear and whom for... I guess they've just done it once more.
Thanks Giles, appreciate your perspective. The simplicity is definitely compelling.
Appreciate all your audio focused videos greatly.
Thanks Incee!
Another comprehensive yet simple review. I value learning what I don't need every bit as much as what I do.
Ha! Thanks Ike!
Very nice and thorough review. I chuckled quite a bit when you we’re doing the range test and breathing heavy.
I’ve done some vlogging with the XSWD, and one other note to mention is that the clipping system is better on the Rode Link. The XSWD is not good when placed in the back pocket. I vlog placing it in my front pocket to avoid it unclipping and dangling from my back pocket. Overall, I’m happy with it when vlogging with my GoPro7, Oly EM5ii, and Canon EOS RP. It’s fast to set up, but construction is quite weak. The threading that connects the 3.5 input for the receiver will not screw on and connect, and this is my second set that does that. I returned the first set because of that reason, but I’m suspecting this is a consistent reoccurring thing. Please double check you set over time and let me know if your set does that over time. Thanks!
Another thing is the construction for my receiver holding clamp is wobbling due to weak plastics construction. Again, please double check your unit over time.
And, after seeing your different lav mid, I’m considering buying one that’s smaller because people sometimes stare at my mic clipped around my neck area. LOL!!!
Thanks Heng! This one is just on loan from B&H so I need to send it back. So thanks for the info on how well the plastic holds up (or rather doesn't) over time.
Curtis Judd , I just shot a range test on our football field, and next is the obstruction test.
The in office obstruction (loss of line of sight) test was impressive (>100'), especially when compared to the Rode Wireless GO( 15-30'). If you anticipate this condition, such as weddings, I would go with this system.
👍
Great review. I just wanted to mention that you can use a mini to male XLR cable (like the Sennheiser CL100) to connect the receiver you have to a camera or recorder with an XLR input. That way you can use the receiver with either.
Thank you Sven.
Thanks! I just confirmed this same question with Senheisser!
Thank you so much for your thorough evaluation, without all the "UA-cam Shenanigans."
You are most welcome!
I was deadset locked in on buying the Rode system, but I'm definitely going the Sennheiser for my first wireless system. Another great review as usual.
Thanks and I hope it works well for you!
Loving the new production look and feel Curtis!
Thanks Erich!
Hi Curtis, I enjoy so much your reviews! Nice cozy warm atmosphere captured with your Blackmagic camera! Have you recorded in 4k or 1080p? Blackmagic RAW, ProRES or what? I would love to know!
Hi, thanks! This was captured in UHD, Blackmagic Raw.
Thanks Curtis! Always appreciate your videos. :)
Thanks!
This was a great review (per usual). Thanks, Curtis!
Mahalo.
Thank you Curtis, great review and as always keep up the great YT channel!
Thanks Jose, will do!
Yes! Yes! Yes! I've waited for your review! Thanks! One quick question, if you don't mind. I'm considering buying Beachtek DXA-MICRO-PRO PLUS and 2 sets of these Sennheiser sets, so I could record 2 people at the same time and reduce the levels, if required. Do you think that's a good idea? I'm using GH5. It's a lot of money, so it might take me a very long time to save that much money to improve my horrible audio 🤣
Yes, that combination should work nicely. Best wishes!
@@curtisjudd Thank you!
As always, thanks for the clear and solid review. Truly appreciated.
👍
I've been waiting for this review from you and finally it's here. Thanks a lot for your work! Did you try Audio-Technica System 10 as well? How it compares to this Sennheiser?
Hi Kirill, thanks! I haven't tried the AT System 10 yet. It is still on my list to try.
Usual high quality, concise and informative review. Thanks Curtis.
The sound from the Sennheiser XSW-D in this review seems lacking in fidelity and poor bass and clarity. It would be interesting to hear a comparison with the RØDE FilmMaker Kit. I would expect the RØDE to sound much better. You could also compare it with a different Lav plugged into the XSW-D. (Why do manufacturers insist on such dumb naming instead of giving their products a name we can actually remember?)
Thanks! The RODELink sample is in there. 😉
I too have an issue with the audio, sound like picking up too much plosive, given he was not speaking directly in the mic.
Very good comparison and professional video overall as usual Curtis. Thank you !
Thanks Laurent!
Really good video Curtis, thinking of getting this for my whiteboard math lessons. I have been using a Power DeWise lapel mic, but it's pretty noisy - not bad for some 20 dollars - but not as good as I'd like. Thanks a lot for the thorough review!
Thanks, I hope it works well for you and best wishes on your tutorials!
Just did an on the water demo of this kit. I really love it! Excellent video, thank you!
Thanks Cooper, good to know it works out on the water, too!
@@curtisjudd For sure! I had a slight cut out at probabky 50-60 feet but I had my back to the camera and had the transmitter down in the front of my waders. Once I repositioned the transmitter, it worked flawlessly :)
Always such great and clear advice in a professional and friendly manner! Many thanks.
Thanks Nick!
Got this. Love it overall but the levels are crazy high and have no adjustment that I can find. it’s a real problem.
Agreed. Some cameras have enough mic input adjustment range to handle it, but it is a real problem on some cameras.
@@curtisjudd This unit is geared towards extreme portability. So for example using on a phone work great for field work. Expect it's so high that it clips. Give it a try, this seems like a big deal.
@@GavinSeim Hi Gavin, I'm sorry, I didn't consider this for use with phones as it will require an adapter in most cases (TRS to TRRS) and on our channel we focus on shooting with dedicated cameras. I sent the unit back as it was only on loan for the review. For use with phones, I'd imagine you'd want to use a phone app like Filmic Pro where you can control the input level.
Are you on iPhone or Android and which camera or audio recording app are you using? I'm curious whether apps with input settings would make it usable.
@@curtisjudd I use it on all kinds of cameras but even on my A7R3 I have to dial the level back in camera to a fraction of what is normal on the Rode link Rode. I see no need whatsoever to have it this high. I use IOS at the moment.
Filmic is great, what what about live streamers using this mic, Here we have a mic geared to for mobile vlogging that does not really work on mobiles. For a company to make a compact mic that won't work properly on mobile when most of the videos on UA-cam are made on mobile is Pretty disappointing. Good review, people should just keep this in mind. This is a major design omission.
Totally understand the frustration. With cameras, usually dialing the mic input gain back is better for the audio quality in the end because you reduce the amount of amplification the camera has to do to the signal. However, I agree that it would be nice to dial the output of the receiver back just a notch for cameras like the Panasonic GH5.
Totally understand re: mobile as well. A look at Sennheiser's marketing materials suggests that they did NOT intend for this to be used with mobile devices And, this particular kit includes a hotshoe mount for DSLR/Hybrid cams as well as a TRS output cable and does NOT include a TRRS cable for mobile phones. One could easily argue that they foolishly missed the mobile market. But I do think they specifically had DSLR and hybrid dedicated cameras in mind for this product.
Just wanted to say that I have watched all of your reviews, and they are invaluable. THANKS! One tip: you might want to check out the SE Electronics SE8. I've only used it once but it feels like a budget MKH50
Thanks for the tip!
Very good review. If you had said 2 years ago what would be my run-n-gun dream replacement for a Sennheiser G4 system, this XSW system would be a dream come true. It just works and for a no muss no fuss git er done video shoot, this is amazing. Would I use this if I was in a studio and had plenty of time for audio setup, no way. I'm on a college campus and we do lots of interviews of students, professors and staff and often no time for set up, but this sure beats having to use a shotgun mic, especially in noisy environments. Thanks Sennheiser.
Sure is convenient.
Interesting. Speaking of reverb -- thanks again for the iZotope recommendation. Saved my butt a couple of times.
👍
I bought this lav set with XLR receiver and plug it in to a Tascam DR-10X, best set up to carry on my pocket to easily check it when I want.
👍🏻
I shoot videos in my personal office.
What’s your recommendation for a dual channel wireless lavaliere system?
What about for a 3 channel wireless lav system?
Basically, I want 2 or 3 talents to each have a wireless lav mic.
I currently have the Azden pro Xd which sounds fine except it isn’t dual channel.
I shoot with my iPhone X. Thanks!!!
Hi! You're looking to record 3 lavalier microphones to an iPhone X? You might consider AirLinc over at airlinc.io
Then you'll need lavalier microphones for each of the phones. The Sennheiser ClipMic Digital is a decent option for iPhones: bhpho.to/2yOdLr4
The Sennheiser MKE2 Digital is quite a lot better sounding but much more expensive: bhpho.to/2B2WxME
JZ helps - a Florida injury law firm vs
Best reviews and advice! Thanks, Curtis!
Thanks Kelly!
Great review -- But one thing that I was hoping you would mention is how it compares to in sound quality to say EW100 G3 lavs... I am attracted to the xsw's form factor and the fact that it seems made for cameras like the BMPCC 4k the Rode that you compare it to is not so attractive to me for the exact reason (form factor) but I have been relatively happy with the sound I have got from my EW100 G3's and if you think that this sound is comparable that may be enough for me.
The G3 sounds better to my ear.
@@curtisjudd OK good to know... I am looking forward to your Deity Wireless review... I am gearing up for a year of shooting abroad and wanna make sure I have the right tools! your reviews are very helpful and a great contrast to all the noise that is found on UA-cam these days.
Another great review Curtis. I was hoping you would review this system, as I have been considering buying one. One noob question: Aside from occasional interference, does a cheaper system like this give you lesser audio quality than a pro system? Or is the quality of the mic the only thing that matters?
Hi xak huh, Good question. I think that the microphone contributes probably 80% of the overall audio quality and the wireless transmission is the remaining 20%.
Thanks so much for the reply. A sound comparison to one of your more pro systems would be super helpful in the future.
@@xakhuh5104 Good idea. Thanks.
Nice video Curtis. Waiting for you review of the new Deity wireless system :)
If everything goes well with my schedule, we should have that for you next week.
Very well made ! Thanks Curtis !!
Thanks Phil!
If you're in an office like that normally I've found 2.4GHZ transmissions will do better than in a home or any other situation for that matter. I'm not sure if it's repeaters or the surface not obsorbing the 2.4GHZ but my testing in a home setup did not do this good at all on obstacle range with this unit
Thanks for that, Isaiah. Interesting. Most of this was recorded at my home aside from the distance test at the office. Good to know!
When the Deity wireless review?
Next week. 😀
Curtis Judd cool!!! :)
Looking forward to that!😉
Almost a month passed by! :(
Wheeeen?!!!
This had me rolling in laughter! That office scene, especially. Every time you are the unscripted Curtis it makes me chuckle.
God bless you, sir!
Also, do you still own the Samson C02 pair that you reviewed some years ago?
😀
No, I just borrowed the CO2 for the review.
Darn. I am doing a bit of personal investigating on that mic; as it turns out the mics you reviewed had five vent-slits in the capsule, mine only have three.
Short of getting in contact with Samson directly, I find no mention of the capsule difference anywhere online, as of yet.
No worries. I will see if Gerald Undone still uses the C02 as his main.
Thank you for the response!
Is that the cardioid capsule with the 3 vents?
Nice review. I’m unsure where I land on this system. If they had undercut the Rode price by a good margin, I think it’d be a much easier choice.
Hey Ray, understood. I think they're aiming for a slightly different crowd, but I'm not sure there's a distinct group of people that would rather give up the ability to set the input and output levels for smaller TX and RX units. I guess the market will speak for itself. :)
Awesome tests as usual. They really stand out. Thanks 🙏
Thanks!
Thanks! great video! Whats the soundtrack you use in your outro?
Thanks! That's a song my brother composed. He calls it MzA.
So Curtis... You just set a new standard for testing: traveling to the North Pole for testing purposes! :-P
These Sennheisers look quite fantastic and probably what I'll end up getting. For the simple interview and event work, should be perfect. Thanks for the great review!
Hahaha! Thanks Ricardo!
I've been interested in this. Thanks for this review.
You're welcome!
Instead of the supplied 3.5mm audio cable to connect the receiver to the GH5 camera, I used a Sescom LN2MIC-ZOOMH4N 3.5mm Line to Mic 9-Inch Audio Cable which has 25dB of attenuation. I adjusted the audio gain on the GH5 to 0dB and this produced clean audio that peaked at -12dB with the lav mic with no limiter required. In conclusion, the audio from the Sennheiser XSW-D is about 13 dB too hot for the GH5 using the supplied 3.5mm audio cable and the audio gain set all the way down to -12dB.
Thanks Randy, that’s very useful info!
Another great video and review, so practical, professional and useful. If you are recording into a mobile with another person recording and say you're making a presentation or a review, which wireless entry level mic would you recommend?
Hi Javier, thanks! The Aputure A.Lav was good when I tested it several years ago.
Blackmagic video looks a tad nicer than the GH5 (on my iPhone at least) which I found interesting...and the review was top notch as always!
I agree, thanks!
Another excellent review and a great products for people on a budget.
Thanks!
Another great review; as I've grown to expect.
Since you mentioned latency, which digital wireless lav systems have this problem?
The Sennheiser AVX system has 19ms of latency. I suspect a large part of that is that it does some serious encryption which is more important for news gathering.
@@curtisjudd Thanks a lot for replying to my query.
Since I do own the Rodelink system, I've found that it does work for me.
However my only gripe is the size of the unit(s)!
This system from Sennheiser seems to take care of that aspect.
I'll probably think of it as an add-on! 😊
Sounds good!
I like the new look man. not that 1980 look any more he he he, congs. And appreciate the constant info and education you provide, very detailed and helpful.
Thanks.
:)
Thanks for the overview. I actually use the Me-2 version 2 as a lav in my UA-cam videos. I like it. Mine is in rough shape however (no idea how. I feel that someone got to it, and never told me, but that's another story...), but I agree. It sounds nice for what it is. I keep considering this option. Thanks for that distance test!
You bet! Thanks Dave.
Seems like most companies are making now small and "affordable" wireless systems as a new trent in 2019. "Rode Wireless Go Compact Wireless Microphone System" got released. I would love to see your review and opinion on it, compared to this system here and other small portable in the same class similar systems. Thanks
Hi Alex, count on it. A copy of the Wireless Go is already on its way so we can review it.
@@curtisjudd great. I am very interested. The battery is a big question, its long use durability and replacement options. Also using multiple units together. Looking forward for your review!
With the GH5 and this mic, I’ll get a static like distortion at times, even when speaking in the same consistent lower volume. Any idea on which setting I could use, or is this some type of 2.4ghz interference?
Hmm, not sure. Do you have a sample online?
Very good review - thanks!
Thanks!
Congratulations on the review. Very good! I really like the sound of Sennheiser. Today (2002), comparing the Sennheiser XSW-D x Rode Wireless GO II, which would you choose? I saw dozens of reviews and I still have doubts. The RW GO II system is very good and comes with dual channel. But I still think the Sennheiser sound is better. The problem is that to have a "dual channel" on Sennheiser you would have to buy 2 kits. I work with the Zoom H4n Pro and would use the RW GO II or XSW-D on it instead of the camera (most of the time).
If you need 2 channels, I'd go with the RODE Wireless GO II.
@@curtisjudd Okay! Thanks for the answer. 1 question about the GO II: I didn't see any review with it being used on a recorder, like the Zoom H4n Pro, for example. How can the GO II be configured it might be confusing to use it in a recorder? Why would I have to do two settings? As far as I know, using the XLR input is better for the sound. More quality. Therefore, in short films I would think of the GO II connecting to a recorder through an XLR - P2 adapter. In journalism works, I would use it directly connected to the camera. Sorry for so many questions. I'm a little "lost", with many doubts, and in need of tips.
This looks like a great unit, thanks for the review Curtis! Will you be reviewing the new Rode wireless Go?
Yes, Wireless Go is on the way.
Great job as usual, as far wireless is concerned I don't have a professional one so this may be it. I ended up finding a deal on the XLR GH5 adapter so I might go for the xlr input version.
Thanks Clayton. I hope it works well for you.
Excellent review
Thanks
Great Review!
Thanks!
Nice piece of information. Thank you very much
You're most welcome.
Hi Curtis, you are the most professional youtuber in this field. Please, can you tell me the sampling rate of the system? I can't find any info on the web. Thank you for your reviews.
I don't see that Sennheiser has shared that information anywhere. The output of the system is analogue so the real question is whether it sounds good enough for your purposes.
Great review! It is definitely a very attractive product with its small foot print. Plus you can wirelessly connect XLR input/output, that's pretty neat. The AF on the GH5s was awful though
Thanks Dwayne.
Hi Curtis, I think this system has a big advantage with cost. If you need a two channel set up it's still not that expensive. BobUK.
I agree. Cost is relative but to me this seems fairly priced. Some on tighter budgets might not agree, but I don't know of any other options at a lower price with this level of quality.
Hi Curtis, would you say the sound coming from the XSW-D into a zoom f8 would sound noticeably different than a G4 system into the same recorder? Concerned with getting pro quality audio for filmmaking. Thanks!
The G4 is cleaner by a bit in my experience.
I like the set that includes the adaptor for a shotgun mic. Maybe you could do a test on the shotgun mic adaptor? Maybe?
Hi Todd, I believe that the XLR transmitter does not supply phantom power so it'll only work for shotgun mics which supply their own power. Is this the adapter you are referring to?
Wonderful and informative video. Thank you for sharing : )
You bet! 👍
Curtis, I'm a wedding videomaker and I bought the Comica Boomx-u and I didn't like because it have much interference
Do you think, in 2020, the senheiser is a good option? Or rode wireless go is best?
All of these 2.4GHz consumer wireless systems will have interference issues if there's a lot of wifi or other wireless activity in the same location. The Sennheiser and RODE might be a little better, but they're not a panacea, definitely not perfect either. When the person wearing them turns, the RODE in particular tends to drop the signal. The Sennheiser did a little better, but still not perfect.
Like camera sensors, there's something to be said for having large diaphragms, so that negative of it being a little big is perhaps a positive? I have the AT10 which is the same size as the Rode, and similar gauges and settings and I never find them really useful. Indeed, they're just distracting. I mean if the RX shows only one bar, what is one supposed to do? I have a Sony Bluetooth, similar to the Sennheiser, and love the small size and functionality. In short, this looks it would be a perfect solution for many, myself included. The bottom line is if you can't get a good signal it doesn't matter. So I believe that is the only question with wireless lavs and your tests seem to indicate you're not paying $350 for nothing ;) Finally, showing off your Rodecaster I see. ; ) Yes, I'm sure I'm not the only one who noticed!
Hi Maxotics, interesting point re: the diaphragm size. Could be! I have found that some of the very expensive pro lavaliers which are much smaller generally sound better but I bet they have to do a LOT of engineering to get them to that point.
In regards to the RODECaster, I have a confession to make: I wasn't so much trying to show it off as I was trying to hide the cables that hang down behind the little stand the computer sits on. :)
Brilliant review thank you so much for your help
You’re welcome. Happy recording!
Love your reviews and channel! QUESTION: do you recommend the avx, xs-d, or G4 for "noticably" better sound quality?
AVX with the MKE2 microphone.
@@curtisjudd Would the xsw-d work with the mke2 microphone (i.e. without phantom power)?
@@patrickpaganini Yes, MKE2 will work and will sound great.
@@curtisjudd Thanks Curtis!
Curtis Judd would you feel like the new MKE Essential Omni is much of a step down? I just discovered this new mic.
Curtis, do you think its worth getting the XLR receiver for this? The sound sounds pretty amazing to me with just the base set that you are using. I use the GH5 and was considering getting the Panasonic XLR module for it but now I dont know if I need it...
Cheers!
I'd have a look at the new RODE WIRELESS GO instead. Its receiver has settings to reduce the output level to work well with the GH5. Just learned about it a couple of days ago here: ua-cam.com/video/0CqlFX07mNI/v-deo.html
Thank you for this review 👍
You're welcome!
Thanks for the video. IM in the market for some wireless mics.
You're welcome. Best wishes!
Hi Curtis. Thanks for you great review. I really liked it.
A few ago I bought the aspen mics because of your review. Can I use any lavalier with this system or only the the Sennheisers? And if it is possible, are the aspen mics as good as this Sennheiser lavalier?
Hi Josh, you can use any microphone with a 3.5mm TRS plug for Sennhesier. I prefer the included microphone over the Aspen mic. But you can use third party mics, they just need to be specifically wired/terminated for Sennheiser (often they will say for Sennheiser Evolution Wireless G3/G4).
Audio technical system 10 is also a competitor and has excellent sound
Good point, thanks!
Great reviews
Thanks.
Nice review as always ....You'd probably be the only youtuber who's tested this.
With the previous Sennheiser Wireless kits (G2 and G3), you set the sensitivity on
Canon cameras (70d, 80d) to just 1 click above zero so Canon's preamps
didn't kick in and clip. Do you have any idea if it is the same with this or what I should set the settings on?
Yes, you'd use the same process except that with the XSW-D, you cannot reduce the output level so you'll start with the camera's input level at one notch below off, and move it up if needed to optimize the levels (aiming for peaks at -12dB, -6dB at the most). Best wishes!
@@curtisjudd Thank you very much. I knew you'd have the answer.
Hello Curtis, do you think the XSW-D would be also appropriate for giving Yoga classes at home (for example for a live streaming on Zoom) or would you suggest another solution for that? Thank you for taking time for answering me, Büke
Yes, absolutely. The small size makes it a good option.
Great review. I'm evaluating several options.. can they pair to multiple receivers for backup recording?
I don't think so, but I only had one kit so wasn't able to test.
Hello Curtis, another great review, thank you!
I have a quick question for you. I am using mix-pre 3 for all my work but sometimes I need quick/simple & lighter solution for audio.
I was thinking about Rode Wireless Go MIC system but I just saw this video. If price is not an issue, what would you prefer for run & gun quick project, Rode Wireless Go or Sennheiser XSW-D? Thanks in advance.
I haven't worked a lot with the GO yet as I just got a copy last week, but so far, I was really impressed that it worked so well at the NAB show convention where my pro wireless system wasn't working reliably. I should have a review up on the WIRELESS GO in a few weeks.
Curtis Judd I am looking forward to your review
I have the rode link and looking for a second setup. Would this compliment well?
Yes, as long as you have an additional mic input.
At 8:15 I got really scared as I never saw Curtis this mad before. Lol JK a stellar review as always. One question I had though how will this mic cope with supplying the audio for a bride if the groom has it on. Maybe you can do an indoor and outdoor test with someone talking into it thanks.
:) I had to send it back so I don't have it any longer, but this lavalier mic (omni-directional) seems like most that I've used. As long as the bride is within about 1/2 a meter, it'll pick her up. When she gets much farther than that, we don't pick much up.
Hey Curtis! Would you say this kit is better in terms of audio quality when compared to the Rode Wireless Go using a Rode lav +? I’m interested in the me2 lav because it seems to be better than my current rode lavs.
Hi, yes, the Sennheiser seems to sound slightly better, at least on my voice.
Just check out the current price of Sennheiser XSW-D, because I think, one could buy lavalier set as low as 200USD :)))))) Big thank to Black Friday :) I took one for myself to be able life recording my lectures in physics. Thinking of getting the second one, just to be able to record onstage life dialogs and interviews, if I will need it in the future, but still hesitating. Hope mic is compatible with Zoom F1, since I have bought the shotgun kit.
👍
Curtis, thank you so much for this helpful video. One idea, around 7:47, you mentioned the input level is a bit high for some of the Panasonic GH-series cameras. Do you think passing the audio through a Zoom H1 (or a similar device) be able to act as an attenuated (as well as providing a backup track)?
Hi Silverlightphoto - its worth a try. A cleaner solution might be to run it through an attenuation cable to bump down the level just a bit. Best wishes!
@@curtisjudd Thank you so much for taking your time to help me, and so many other people, through your UA-cam channel!
If I may, one more question: If I can only afford 1 wireless mic setup at this time, what if I were to get the all XLR version (XLR transmitter and receiver) of the XSW-D...
...Then if I need to plug into a 3.5mm input, I can get a 3.5mm to XLR adapter cable to (also) attenuate the signal?
NOTE: The reason I know many of these adapter cables attenuate is that I have tried several of these cables and was initially DISAPPOINTED that they reduced the mic level. In THIS case, however, it may be a benefit!
Then, on the TRANSMITTER side,
I could use it for either a handheld XLR mic, an XLR lavalier (such as the Audio Technica Pro 70) or if I need to use a 3.5mm lavalier, could I use a Rode VXLR adapter?
I bought this from Amazon a few days ago and am sending it back tomorrow. I am very disappointed in this Sennheiser system. I planned to use it as a mic for my iPhone 13 Pro which I am using to shoot news. My main mic will be Deity as it has a proper XLR transmitter but I needed a back up. I was between the Sennheiser ENG set and Godox move link. Godox move link was much better. The reasons why I really disliked this Sennheiser :
1 It doesn't have a port for headphone. The Godox has one on its transmitter, which plugs directly to my iPhone. I had to use a Rode adapter so I could connect the Sennheiser receiver to my iPhone and also monitor the sound being recorded.
2 The noise of a quiet room when I used the lavaliere was too present. I could hear a strong buzzing added to sounds of the street that I would normally not hear. I am no sound expert but didn't need to be one to notice that there was much less "buzzing" when I used Deity lavaliere and Godox lavaliere. So, I couldn't say it was something wrong with my phone as I used the same settings (50% gain) and the same cam app (Beastgrip cam). The noise of the room was present only in the Sennheiser recording.
3 I plugged a Rode reporter to the XLR transmitter. I could never work with it because the sound was just too low. Again, everything else the same, I plugged the Rode to the Deity XLR transmitter and the sound was louder.
4 It doesn't have phantom power so I am limited in my choice of microphones. I have a Neumann handheld which needs power and could use it with the Deity as its transmitter powered the mic. But I couldn't use it with the Sennheiser . The sound of the Godox attached to its handheld adapter was much stronger and clear than the sound of this Sennheiser using the Rode mic. The handheld adapter transmits more noise when handled than a real mic would do but I used it to record Vox pops and had no problems. But I was holding it . I would be really worried if I was working with a. reporter as some of them like to move the mic and that noise will go directly to the sound of the interview, ruining it. The option to use a XLR transmitter (and , therefore, a real mic) is the only reason why I am considering the Godox Wmic S1 pro to use as my back up mic instead of the Movelink. Maybe the Godox would be even my main mic instead of the Deity?
I am actually surprised seeing the number of positive reviews about the Sennheiser. I wouldn't say the problem is caused because I am recording to an iPhone because, as I said before, the same mic performed better when I used a Deity transmitter.
Surprised and sad because I didn't like to see a mic from such a traditional and well known company, Sennheiser, being outperformed by a relatively new company which, I am sorry but I can't help it, makes me think of cheap products.
Sennheiser microphones and inputs are wired slightly differently than most other 3.5mm interfaces so that is likely why you got the buzzing sound. If your use case is to use third party mics with this or any other Sennheiser system, they need to be specifically wired for Sennheiser 3.5mm.
@@curtisjudd Thanks for your reply. My comment was too long so maybe things got lost in translation. I used the Sennheiser lavaliere with the Sennheiser transmitter and receiver. It was all Sennheiser. Yet, there was a lot of buzz. And I can't blame the iPhone because there was no buzz with Godox's and Deity's lavaliere mics
I should have recorded a video and used it as review but was in a hurry. One thing I didn't do in my test was to use the Sennheiser lavaliere with other systems, the Deity for example, and use another lavaliere with the Sennheiser transmitter. That would have cleared any doubts. Too late now as I've sent the set back. I've ordered the Godox pro system. It is compatible with their XLR transmitter and that is essential to me as I need to connect a reporter mic to my phone. I've already have the Deity but as I said I never go out with a sound back up. But the microphone will be only one, obviously. There is just so much I can carry in my backpack. I've ordered a Sennheiser MD 46 as I am not too happy with the Rode reporter mic. The Godox movelink with its handheld adapter is going back. The handheld adapter could be very noisy in the wrong hands but the main reason why I decided to make this change is because some reporters are open to new technologies but many are not. The only tool a reporter uses is a microphone so they will feel more comfortable if they are facing a phone instead of a camera if the microphone is a real reporter mic, with which they are familiar with.
That Godox adapter looks rather tacky and unprofessional but the sound of the little transmitter was strong and clear. But to make the reporter feel more comfortable is more important hence a XLR plugged to a microphone instead of a small transmitter on the top of the handle.
I have a Sennheiser MKE 400 and am very impressed with its capacity to reject wind noise. But this kit from Sennheiser is rather amateurish to my thinking.The fact that a receiver for small equipment doesn't have a port for a headphone always tells me a lot.
I am new to this world of smartphones, SLRs and UA-cam. I am old school and when I started to work as a cameraman there was only one professional video camera: Sony U-Matic which was followed by Sony Betacam. I think Ikegami was also making cameras but I worked only with Sony. Panasonic and JVC were doing only VHS at the time. Blackmagic didn't even exist then. And SLRs didn't record video.
And microphones were invariably Sony or Sennheiser. Things were much simpler then...
Now it's such a jungle of names and options that can easily drive one crazy. I spent no less than a month buying equipment, researching, reading, watching reviews here.
Incidentally, thanks for your reviews. They are among the reviews who really helped me in my marathon of equipment buying.
It was a lot o try and error. A lot of sending things back to B&H and losing the money I had spent on taxes and shipping. I bought most of what I wanted on Amazon or UK online shops but many times B&H was the only option and sometimes even the faster. It takes less time to receive a product from B&H in the US than from Germany, for example.
So, being new to this world I was rather suspicious of everything small and with names unknown to me. But I've learned very fast to be less, say, snob, and worked with the likes of Deity etc. I just love the freedom that mobile phones give me. I am going to post at some point a long review called "How to shoot news with an iPhone or how I learned to stop worrying and love cam apps".
Small is beautiful 🙃
Absolutely Incredible PRO Presentation. Thank you so much. Subscribed immediately.
Thanks Jazz Bourne
I have the xlr base kit.... well made but, u really have to use a hi end mic like the sennheiser me66... that mic is super sensitive and because of that you can afford to gain down a little on the camera... and hence not getting as much hiss.
Good to know, thanks for that Carlos!