These conservative responses to the arguments are less than paper thin. This video states that the two prophesies that don't come true in Daniel 11, where Antiochus invades Etheopia and dies in Palestine, the narrator suggests that those are for the antichrist and they haven't happened yet. Why on earth would the Antichrist want to invade Etheopia? And why would this person suggest that the Antichrist would die in Palestine, which strongly contradicts the book of Revelation. These arguments are weak at best, dishonest at worst.
Hello Sir, your notes are precise and very informative. Can I get a pdf copy.
Sure. Email me joesprinkle11@gmail.com
These conservative responses to the arguments are less than paper thin. This video states that the two prophesies that don't come true in Daniel 11, where Antiochus invades Etheopia and dies in Palestine, the narrator suggests that those are for the antichrist and they haven't happened yet. Why on earth would the Antichrist want to invade Etheopia? And why would this person suggest that the Antichrist would die in Palestine, which strongly contradicts the book of Revelation. These arguments are weak at best, dishonest at worst.
I give a more detailed argument in my commentary on Daniel, if you want to see my best response.