Joe Sprinkle
Joe Sprinkle
  • 497
  • 68 426
Amos 7 WHEN THEY REJECT OUR MESSAGE 2024
A Sermon on Amos 7 1-15 by Dr Joe Sprinkle
Переглядів: 40

Відео

Malachi
Переглядів 14Місяць тому
Malachi
Zechariah
Переглядів 22Місяць тому
Lecture introduction to the book of Zechariah by Dr. Joe Sprinkle
Haggai
Переглядів 39Місяць тому
Lecture Introduction to the book of Haggai
Zephaniah
Переглядів 12Місяць тому
Lecture introduction of the book of Zephaniah by Dr. Joe Sprinkle.
Habakkuk
Переглядів 22Місяць тому
Lecture introduction to the book of Habakkuk by Dr. Joe Sprinkle. Dialogue of the prophet with God leads to the lesson, "the just will live by faith." Hab 2:4
Nahum
Переглядів 56Місяць тому
Nahum
Micah
Переглядів 20Місяць тому
Lecture introduction to the book of Micah, by Dr. Joe Sprinkle.
Jonah
Переглядів 19Місяць тому
Lecture on the book of Jonah, including the question of whether the book is history or parable and its relevance for Christians today. By Dr. Joe Sprinkle.
Obadiah
Переглядів 26Місяць тому
Lecture on the book of Obadiah by Dr. Joe Sprinkle
Amos
Переглядів 222 місяці тому
Lecture Introduction to the book of Amos. By Dr. Joe Sprinkle.
Joel
Переглядів 232 місяці тому
Lecture introduction to the book of Joel by Dr. Joe Sprinkle
Hosea
Переглядів 252 місяці тому
Lecture introduction on the book of Hosea by Dr. Joe Sprinkle
Daniel
Переглядів 1072 місяці тому
Lecture introduction to the book of Daniel by Dr. Joe Sprinkle. Deals with the issue of whether or not the book is historical and a survey of Daniel's content.
Ezekiel Part 2 Oracles against the Nations and Eschatological Blessings on Judah and Jerusalem
Переглядів 412 місяці тому
Part 2 of a two part lecture on Ezekiel by Dr. Joe Sprinkle
Ezekiel Part 1 Introduction and Judgment on Judah and Jerusalem rev
Переглядів 492 місяці тому
Ezekiel Part 1 Introduction and Judgment on Judah and Jerusalem rev
Lamentations
Переглядів 362 місяці тому
Lamentations
Jeremiah Part 2 Selective Passages
Переглядів 302 місяці тому
Jeremiah Part 2 Selective Passages
Jeremiah Part 1 Introduction Biography and History
Переглядів 812 місяці тому
Jeremiah Part 1 Introduction Biography and History
Isaiah Part 3 Isaiah 40 66
Переглядів 972 місяці тому
Isaiah Part 3 Isaiah 40 66
Isaiah Part 2 Isaiah 1 39
Переглядів 1302 місяці тому
Isaiah Part 2 Isaiah 1 39
Isaiah Part 1 Introduction
Переглядів 1173 місяці тому
Isaiah Part 1 Introduction
Song of Songs
Переглядів 633 місяці тому
Song of Songs
Ecclesiastes
Переглядів 153 місяці тому
Ecclesiastes
Proverbs Part 2 The Simple Ideal Persons and Hermeneutics
Переглядів 293 місяці тому
Proverbs Part 2 The Simple Ideal Persons and Hermeneutics
Proverbs Part 1 Introduction and Wisdom and Fear of the Lord
Переглядів 233 місяці тому
Proverbs Part 1 Introduction and Wisdom and Fear of the Lord
Psalms Part 3 Imprecatory Psalms
Переглядів 223 місяці тому
Psalms Part 3 Imprecatory Psalms
Psalms Part 2 Genres
Переглядів 283 місяці тому
Psalms Part 2 Genres
Psalms Part 1 Critical Introduction
Переглядів 384 місяці тому
Psalms Part 1 Critical Introduction
Job Part 3 Job 32 42 Elihu and God
Переглядів 134 місяці тому
Job Part 3 Job 32 42 Elihu and God

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @hermanq.5271
    @hermanq.5271 13 днів тому

    Thank you so much for the presentation. It was very helpful to me. Keep up the good work. Q~

  • @genebaker6964
    @genebaker6964 18 днів тому

    Appreciate you putting this together

  • @genebaker6964
    @genebaker6964 21 день тому

    These have been very helpful. I've alawys found Isaiah to be messy and difficult.

  • @4305051
    @4305051 29 днів тому

    Thanks for posting. Very clear and interesting.

  • @riklouman673
    @riklouman673 Місяць тому

    Very valuable insights, thank you for the efforts dr. Joe.

  • @edmann4287
    @edmann4287 Місяць тому

    Thank you Dr Sprinkle for the video you presented. I've been looking for specific teaching on hermeneutics for the Other Letters of Paul and stumbled on your channel. It's well-presented.

  • @divineduabil3195
    @divineduabil3195 Місяць тому

    Thank you for this resource very helpful

  • @TobyQuan
    @TobyQuan Місяць тому

    This video is trying to claim that the book of Daniel is accurate history and accurate prophecy. Daniel claims that after the 4th beast, and after the kingdom represented by the feet of the statue is "Destroyed by God", then God will cause ALL other kingdoms on earth to stop. It calls this the End of the Ages, also known as the apocalypse. When we look in a history book, we see that this simply didn't happen. The world didn't end after Rome or Greece or the Seleucid Empire as Daniel falsely prophesied. The only thing we can do is either accept Daniel for what it is (inaccurate history and inaccurate prophecy), or pretend that it's all true.

  • @TobyQuan
    @TobyQuan 2 місяці тому

    These conservative responses to the arguments are less than paper thin. This video states that the two prophesies that don't come true in Daniel 11, where Antiochus invades Etheopia and dies in Palestine, the narrator suggests that those are for the antichrist and they haven't happened yet. Why on earth would the Antichrist want to invade Etheopia? And why would this person suggest that the Antichrist would die in Palestine, which strongly contradicts the book of Revelation. These arguments are weak at best, dishonest at worst.

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 2 місяці тому

      I give a more detailed argument in my commentary on Daniel, if you want to see my best response.

  • @momochakhwoirakpam4266
    @momochakhwoirakpam4266 2 місяці тому

    Hello..... Sir i it would be very grateful if the notes were provided. Any way thank you for the all the videos 🙏 awesome 💯

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle Місяць тому

      Email me and I'll send notes: joesprinkle11@gmail.com

  • @aniltambe74
    @aniltambe74 2 місяці тому

    Hello Sir, your notes are precise and very informative. Can I get a pdf copy.

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 2 місяці тому

      Sure. Email me joesprinkle11@gmail.com

  • @karldegroot1800
    @karldegroot1800 2 місяці тому

    I'm proud you try it - but it's horribly corrupted [-as so many prophets and NT] . There never was no 'laying on the side 360 days and eating lentils' : it was about "the scroll that will be corrupted by Esau". There are no '3d temple chapters' at the end : ghostwritten by Esau . Most of Ezekiel is about 'the other [Eden-] reality' and the evil region Mystery-Babylon [-east of this earth] , starting after the "gate in the north" first chapters , but virtually unrecognizably corrupted . Thank God most has been restored now

  • @betawithbrett7068
    @betawithbrett7068 2 місяці тому

    תודה לך. זה טוב מאוד

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 2 місяці тому

      אני שמח לשמוע את זה

  • @joesprinkle
    @joesprinkle 3 місяці тому

    While I have learned much from Lewis, I don't entirely agree with him on the curses in the Psalms. I quoted him where I liked him but passed over where I found him less helpful. My own view owes much to my teacher Walter Kaiser.

  • @mrtdiver
    @mrtdiver 3 місяці тому

    10:37 You bring up C.S. Lewis regarding another subject matter (taking seriously - right & wrong). But on the imprecatory or cursing psalms Lewis said, they “are indeed devilish” and: “We must not either try to explain them away or to yield for one moment to the idea that, because it comes in the Bible, all this vindictive hatred must somehow be good and pious. We must face both facts squarely. The hatred is there - festering, gloating, undisguised - and also we should be wicked if we in any way condoned or approved it.” (C.S. Lewis, Reflections on the Psalms) Your video presented some good information on the Imprecatory Psalms.

  • @meskaraireang3565
    @meskaraireang3565 3 місяці тому

    Thank you i find this video is so useful

  • @momochakhwoirakpam4266
    @momochakhwoirakpam4266 3 місяці тому

    Hello.... Sir i need the notes

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 3 місяці тому

      Email me. Go to my UA-cam page www.youtube.com/@joesprinkle and click on "more" under my name, and then click on "show email address". Then email me your request and I will send you the file.

  • @momochakhwoirakpam4266
    @momochakhwoirakpam4266 4 місяці тому

    Can I get the notes please?

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 4 місяці тому

      Give me your email and I will gladly send as an attachment.

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 3 місяці тому

      Email me. Go to my UA-cam page www.youtube.com/@joesprinkle and click on "more" under my name, and then click on "show email address". Then email me your request and I will send you the file.

  • @momochakhwoirakpam4266
    @momochakhwoirakpam4266 4 місяці тому

    Please do provide the PFD file, that would be very helpful. thank you 👍

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 4 місяці тому

      Give me your email and I will send it to you.

  • @tehray3094
    @tehray3094 4 місяці тому

    Thank you for your informative lecture! It's so interesting to learn the history of the development of the hypothesis.

  • @jessecamping
    @jessecamping 5 місяців тому

    Great stuff again!

  • @larrybedouin2921
    @larrybedouin2921 5 місяців тому

    The title Deuteronomy, derived from Greek, thus means a “copy,” or a “repetition,” of the law rather than “second law,” as the word's etymology seems to suggest.

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 5 місяців тому

      Point taken. Longman/Dillard explain in more detail as follows: "The name of this book of the Bible comes from a Greek compound that means “second law” or “repetition of the law.” Ironically, it derives from a misunderstanding in the Septuagint of a Hebrew phrase in Deuteronomy 17:18, where the king is instructed to make a “copy of this law.” Although the title of the book rests on a mistranslation in the Septuagint, it is nevertheless a fortuitous error, since Deuteronomy contains a second version of the law delivered on Mount Sinai as recorded in Exodus, Leviticus, and Numbers." Tremper Longman III and Raymond B. Dillard, An Introduction to the Old Testament, Second Edition. (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan, 2007), 102.

  • @Easternromanfan
    @Easternromanfan 5 місяців тому

    Good research and nice lecture

  • @odar9729
    @odar9729 5 місяців тому

    Is there any artifacts out there for the migration of Israel to America. Many Mormons have this idea from when people wanted to answer where the native americas came from. I have a Paleolithic anthropology degree so not my area lol

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 5 місяців тому

      Not that I know of. There is some contrary evidence in the the Egyptian text used to "translate" the Mormon document called the Book of Abraham which was purported to be Smith's translation of an Egyptian papyrus, a papyrus later returned to the Mormon church by the Metropolitan Museum in New York. This "translation" was before Egyptian had been deciphered, reduced to grammar and widely taught. Joseph Smith found in the text a story about Abraham, Joseph and an alleged daughter of Pharaoh, but the text is known by Egyptologists to be a copy of the Egyptian Book of the Dead with nothing in it related to the Bible. It looks like Smith just looked at the hieroglyphs and made up a story from his imagination, showing no supernatural ability to translate the text. That native Americans, who have no distinctively Jewish DNA, are descendants from the lost tribes of Israel, also seems unlikely. Though there is no doubt Israelite blood mixed among the peoples of Mesopotamia among which the northern tribes of Israel were deported by Assyria and subsequently assimilated, intermarried and merged, there is no reason to suppose they migrated from Mesopotamia to the Americas.

    • @odar9729
      @odar9729 5 місяців тому

      @@joesprinkle thank you

  • @gowdsake7103
    @gowdsake7103 5 місяців тому

    So still nothing from jesus or moses then

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 5 місяців тому

      The lecture is for an Old Testament course so I did not try to discuss New Testament archaeology which would require a complete lecture of its own. We do have an inscription of Pilate, the Ossuary of Caiphas, buidings in Masada and Herodium and Hebron built by Herod, Herod's temple retaining wall (the "wailing wall"), physical evidence of someone who was crucified (man named Jehohanan not Jesus). From there we have ancient, non-Christian extra-biblical writings that speak of Jesus (Josephus, the Talmud, Tacitus, Pliny) that loosely fits into archaeology and the NT.

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 5 місяців тому

      For Moses, there is no archaeological evidence, though the name Moses is likely Egyptian in the pattern of Thut-Moses and Ah-Moses and Ra-Moses in which "moses" means begotten of (the god Thoth, Ah, Re etc.) so he fits into the name pattern of the day. See my video introduction to Exodus where I discuss further.

    • @lishaizion
      @lishaizion 5 місяців тому

      Moses wrote the last book of the 5 books of Torah is written in his perspective and his language

  • @Booger-Magnolia
    @Booger-Magnolia 5 місяців тому

    This was a very fun watch. Thank you for sharing your knowledge with the world!

  • @braix7405
    @braix7405 5 місяців тому

    What a treat! Will you be making more videos on Biblical Archaeology?

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 5 місяців тому

      Thanks. Not sure when or if I will do more in this area, but glad you liked what I posted.

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 5 місяців тому

      I do have one more on biblical archaeology coming July 10 (tomorrow). Some archaeology content here and there scattered in my historical book lectures.

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 5 місяців тому

      I do have one more on biblical archaeology coming July 10 (tomorrow). Some archaeology content here and there scattered in my historical book lectures.

  • @TunaseChristian
    @TunaseChristian 6 місяців тому

    you have really done a great job

  • @exegeticalapologetics4970
    @exegeticalapologetics4970 6 місяців тому

    Love your channel! Thank you for going strong. We would be honored to have ya in our discord! God Bless!

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 6 місяців тому

      I have not worked with discord so I am unsure what to say. Glad you are liking my work. I created them for a couple of online courses I teach. Feel free to copy and use as you wish.

  • @GMGMGMGMGMGMGMGMGMGM
    @GMGMGMGMGMGMGMGMGMGM 7 місяців тому

    "Canon" simply means the books that are read in the liturgy. So canon develops organically over time along with the rest of Holy Tradition. There is no ecumenical council that ever declared an official canon. Churches tended to inherit whatever canon was being used by their local Jewish diaspora community, and there were different sets of texts being used during Second Temple Judaism varying with region. Thinking of the canon as a definitive, closed, anthology from which faith flows is a post-Protestant notion of scripture. The canon is that which is fruitful to read in Church. The relationship flows from Church to canon, not canon to Church. The Church decides what to read. While this has generally been the same set of works throughout the world, even up to the 8th century there were lists of canons that do not match the present works we currently call the canon. There was never a definitive moment where the canon was declared. It’s just an organic consensus. The Western Latin church didn't exist before the Frankish theologians began to innovate for political reasons in order to, in Charlemagne's words, "create a new religion with which to evangelise the Slavs" in opposition to Constantinople. The Eastern Orthodox churches are the only ones which have maintained the continuity of apostolic succession, Holy Tradition, ritual & liturgical worship practices of the undivided 1st millennium church (which continue the lineage of the 1st & 2nd temple OT liturgical worship of God) so you should be looking to Orthodoxy as the standard for comparison, not the Germanised churches of the west which are all less than 1000 years old.

  • @bguman
    @bguman 7 місяців тому

    What authority did men have 1500 years after Christ to dismiss 7 books from scripture?

  • @ApocalypticShowPony
    @ApocalypticShowPony 7 місяців тому

    Is it too late to exclude the book of Genesis?

  • @mrtdiver
    @mrtdiver 8 місяців тому

    Belief in millions of years is incongruent with the Bible. 47:03 See Answers in Genesis for evidence of a young earth. Also Ken Ham. This was a good study. A lot to think about from Proverbs 30.

  • @hermanq.5271
    @hermanq.5271 8 місяців тому

    Thank you so much for the teaching on Ps. 126. Especially the tense-less nature of Hebrew verbs; and challenge of determining the etymology of shuv. Good job!

  • @samuelcream7166
    @samuelcream7166 8 місяців тому

    The question remains? Are we being obedient To the New Spiritual Priesthood Covenant- Heb 7:12, Paul's Glorious Gospel, The Glorious Gospel of Christ, The Glorious Gospel of God, Being offered To each of us? To that form of doctrine: Romans 6:17 NOT: 2 Cor 2 Cor 11:4 Note: HIS Commandments- 1 Cor 14:37 The Book of Life =Paul's Gospel Judged by Paul's Gospel- Romans 2:16 Books Opened-Rev 29:12

  • @jenna2431
    @jenna2431 9 місяців тому

    It takes real hubris for a new religion to take the holy book of another religion and go ""Nuh-uh ".

  • @lloydgush
    @lloydgush 9 місяців тому

    Hard for the samaritan torah to be superior due to the sacarcity of resources, but there's certainly parts where it should be superior.

  • @lloydgush
    @lloydgush 9 місяців тому

    They lost the torah from the codex? How? A progrom?

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 9 місяців тому

      Good question. To quote Wikipedia on the Aleppo Codex, "The fate of the codex during the subsequent decade is unclear: when it resurfaced in Israel in 1958, roughly 40% of the manuscript-including the majority of the Torah section-was missing, and only two additional leaves have been recovered since then. The original supposition that the missing pages were destroyed in the synagogue fire has increasingly been challenged, fueling speculation that they survive in private hands." Wikipedia links to a NYT article calling this a "High Holy Who-done-it" mystery. We may never know what happened to it.

    • @lloydgush
      @lloydgush 9 місяців тому

      @@joesprinkle F antisemiticpedia. Reference their sources instead.

  • @rickjohnson9456
    @rickjohnson9456 9 місяців тому

    Joe its upsetting Some way around the line Christians stopped giving importance to hebrew orignal scripts. I feel sadden alot by God i am Sadden the orignal Hebrew bibile ❤ always will live in our life. Love you Christians May God help us finding Him. Ameen

  • @rickjohnson9456
    @rickjohnson9456 9 місяців тому

    ❤ i am a Muslim from Pakistan and reading this great Effort i love Orignal Christianity ❤❤❤❤❤❤

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 9 місяців тому

      Hope you find these videos informative

    • @Brian-kr1pt
      @Brian-kr1pt 9 місяців тому

      Original christianity (practiced by jews) and Islam are basically the same.

  • @DrBob1611
    @DrBob1611 11 місяців тому

    I’m interested in knowing more of the history behind the Second Rabbinic Bible of 1524-1525. And the Rabbinical Texts history. Thanks

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 11 місяців тому

      On a popular level here is some more: biblemanuscriptsociety.com/Bible-resources/Early-Bibles/Rabbinic-Bible

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 11 місяців тому

      An In-Depth analysis is the work by C. D. Ginsberg. Available on books.google.com -- books.google.com/books?id=ZYgJqQG44PUC&printsec=frontcover&dq=C.D.+Ginsburg,+Introduction+to+the+Massoretico-critical+edition+of+the+Hebrew+Bible&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiYgOObudqDAxXQGDQIHc8VDioQ6AF6BAgGEAI#v=onepage&q&f=false

  • @btbb3726
    @btbb3726 Рік тому

    Hello Dr. Sprinkle I just found your channel. I had you as a professor back at TFC in the late 80’s - early 90’s.

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle Рік тому

      A[ways good to hear from former students

  • @AlexKnowles-p4n
    @AlexKnowles-p4n Рік тому

    Could the church reform today

  • @KingKing01
    @KingKing01 Рік тому

    I wish I had heard this before I went into university, in which there was no defense given whatsoever for Mosaic or substantial Mosaic authorship.

  • @jj74qformerlyjailbreak3
    @jj74qformerlyjailbreak3 Рік тому

    You are the light of the world.

  • @benth162
    @benth162 Рік тому

    Not only do you not know who your Gods are, you have no idea "What" your gods are. And here you tout yourself to be an PhD. I used God in the plural because it also says so in Genesis. A word there implied that there was not "A" god but many. Or do you believers just ignore that part because it does not fit in with the narrative you WANT to believe. How can a man received a PhD in a subject that he actually knows so little about. Your bible is nothing but conjecture and assumptions, in other words Fairy Tales, which were designed as a mechanism to keep the animalistic humans under control, to try and convince Homosapiens to be civil with each other. Obviously it didn't work because humans are just as animalistic as they have always been and war upon each other AS THEY ALWAYS HAVE !!! The advanced geneticist who put homo-sapiens together left a lot out otherwise we would not sill be acting as we do.

  • @PinasNews
    @PinasNews 2 роки тому

    You interpreted Pilgrims theory as best interpretation based on evidences from songs of ascent Psalm itself. A great learning. Thanks a lot.

  • @ruachnaim0305
    @ruachnaim0305 2 роки тому

    Thank you for this video.

  • @LaurelsCurls
    @LaurelsCurls 2 роки тому

    Hi there. I realize this course was from a few years ago, but I wonder if you can tell me if there is an answer guide to all of the exercises in Ross' book published anywhere? You mentioned your own guide available for your class, but I am just trying to study Ross' textbook solo so I don't have access to your school's online system. I also recently purchased the Supplementary Exercises for Ross' text and was hoping it would have an answer guide, but it does not. Any assistance on where to find such resources would be lovely. Thank you.

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 2 роки тому

      Not everything, but selected answers are found here. biblicallanguages.net/language-courses-i-teach/hebrew-grammar-i-first-year-course/answer-keys-to-ross-introducing-biblical-hebrew-ibh/

    • @LaurelsCurls
      @LaurelsCurls 2 роки тому

      @@joesprinkle Thank you so much! As I mentioned, I'm just slowly working through Ross' book on my own then watching your lectures after I complete each section. I've always wanted to learn some Biblical Hebrew and now that I'm 40, the time is ripe to do so!! Your lectures are very helpful and adds clarity to what I'm reading in Ross. Please don't remove this lecture series from your channel. Thank you again!

  • @mitchellc4
    @mitchellc4 2 роки тому

    Hello There’s no “fully God and fully man” Jesus is the Messiah The Son of God The Son of David The Son of man The man God has chosen to be his anointed king The man God will judge the world through The man God raised from the dead Jesus will return and rule the nations with believers in the kingdom of God on the earth Jesus has a God There is no triune god in scripture Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent. - Acts 3 13 The God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and of Jacob, the God of our fathers, hath glorified his Servant Jesus; whom ye delivered up, and denied before the face of Pilate, when he had determined to release him. 14 But ye denied the Holy and Righteous One, and asked for a murderer to be granted unto you, 15 and killed the Prince of life; whom God raised from the dead; whereof we are witnesses. Notice Jesus is NOT the God of Abraham 13 The God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and of Jacob, the God of our fathers, hath glorified his Servant Jesus; whom ye delivered up, and denied before the face of Pilate, when he had determined to release him.