Joe Sprinkle
Joe Sprinkle
  • 484
  • 63 003
Daniel
Lecture introduction to the book of Daniel by Dr. Joe Sprinkle. Deals with the issue of whether or not the book is historical and a survey of Daniel's content.
Переглядів: 29

Відео

Ezekiel Part 2 Oracles against the Nations and Eschatological Blessings on Judah and Jerusalem
Переглядів 2514 годин тому
Part 2 of a two part lecture on Ezekiel by Dr. Joe Sprinkle
Ezekiel Part 1 Introduction and Judgment on Judah and Jerusalem rev
Переглядів 2819 годин тому
Ezekiel part 1, lecture by Dr. Joe Sprinkle.
Lamentations
Переглядів 17День тому
Lecture on the book of Lamentations by Dr. Joe Sprinkle, with a goal of finding a message for Christians from the book.
Jeremiah Part 2 Selective Passages
Переглядів 1414 днів тому
Part 2 of a two part lecture on Jeremiah by Dr. Joe Sprinkle. This lecture emphasizes selected prophecies of Jeremiah, concluding with the prophecy of the new covenant in Jeremiah 31:31-34.
Jeremiah Part 1 Introduction Biography and History
Переглядів 5814 днів тому
First of two lectures on the book of Jeremiah by Dr. Joe Sprinkle. This lecture emphasizes the historical backdrop and biography of Jeremiah.
Isaiah Part 3 Isaiah 40 66
Переглядів 7714 днів тому
Lecture on Isaiah 40-66 by Dr. Joe Sprinkle. Special emphasis on the Servant of the LORD (Servant of Yahweh) passages and whether these as messianic.
Isaiah Part 2 Isaiah 1 39
Переглядів 10421 день тому
Lecture on Isaiah 1-39 by Dr. Joe Sprinkle
Isaiah Part 1 Introduction
Переглядів 10221 день тому
Isaiah part 1, introduction to book. By Dr. Joe Sprinkle. Deals with author, date etc. of Isaiah and the question of authorship.
Song of Songs
Переглядів 42Місяць тому
Lecture on the biblical book Song of Song (or Song of Solomon, or Canticles) by Dr. Joe Sprinkle.
Ecclesiastes
Переглядів 10Місяць тому
Lecture on Ecclesiastes by Dr. Joe Sprinkle.
Proverbs Part 2 The Simple Ideal Persons and Hermeneutics
Переглядів 22Місяць тому
The Book of Proverbs, Part 2, Lecture by Dr. Joe Sprinkle. The character type "simple" or naive, the ideal person according to Proverbs.
Proverbs Part 1 Introduction and Wisdom and Fear of the Lord
Переглядів 13Місяць тому
Lecture on Proverbs, Part 1 by Dr. Joe Sprinkle. Introduction, and the concepts of Wisdom and Fear of the Lord.
Psalms Part 3 Imprecatory Psalms
Переглядів 17Місяць тому
Psalms Part 3, the curses in the Psalms (Imprecatory Psalms). Lecture by Dr. Joe Sprinkle
Psalms Part 2 Genres
Переглядів 15Місяць тому
Psalms Part 2, Genres. Lecture by Dr. Joe Sprinkle. Discusses major genres in the Psalms such as hymn, lament, song of thanksgiving, wisdom psalm, royal/messianic psalm and the like.
Psalms Part 1 Critical Introduction
Переглядів 27Місяць тому
Psalms Part 1 Critical Introduction
Job Part 3 Job 32 42 Elihu and God
Переглядів 8Місяць тому
Job Part 3 Job 32 42 Elihu and God
Job part 2 Job 12 31 Second and Third Cycles and Poem on Wisdom
Переглядів 6Місяць тому
Job part 2 Job 12 31 Second and Third Cycles and Poem on Wisdom
Job Part 1 Introduction and Job 1 11
Переглядів 182 місяці тому
Job Part 1 Introduction and Job 1 11
Wisdom Literature Introduction no headshot
Переглядів 82 місяці тому
Wisdom Literature Introduction no headshot
Biblical Hebrew Poetry
Переглядів 272 місяці тому
Biblical Hebrew Poetry
Ezra Nehemiah and Esther
Переглядів 722 місяці тому
Ezra Nehemiah and Esther
Chronicles
Переглядів 302 місяці тому
Chronicles
Writing Prophets Part 2
Переглядів 362 місяці тому
Writing Prophets Part 2
Writing Prophets Part 1
Переглядів 352 місяці тому
Writing Prophets Part 1
Samuel and Kings
Переглядів 222 місяці тому
Samuel and Kings
Ruth
Переглядів 162 місяці тому
Ruth
Judges Part 2 Major Judges and the Theology of the book of Judges
Переглядів 202 місяці тому
Judges Part 2 Major Judges and the Theology of the book of Judges
Judges Part 1
Переглядів 282 місяці тому
Judges Part 1
Joshua Part 2 Historical and Theological Problems
Переглядів 742 місяці тому
Joshua Part 2 Historical and Theological Problems

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @aniltambe74
    @aniltambe74 День тому

    Hello Sir, your notes are precise and very informative. Can I get a pdf copy.

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle День тому

      Sure. Email me joesprinkle11@gmail.com

  • @karldegroot1800
    @karldegroot1800 7 днів тому

    I'm proud you try it - but it's horribly corrupted [-as so many prophets and NT] . There never was no 'laying on the side 360 days and eating lentils' : it was about "the scroll that will be corrupted by Esau". There are no '3d temple chapters' at the end : ghostwritten by Esau . Most of Ezekiel is about 'the other [Eden-] reality' and the evil region Mystery-Babylon [-east of this earth] , starting after the "gate in the north" first chapters , but virtually unrecognizably corrupted . Thank God most has been restored now

  • @betawithbrett7068
    @betawithbrett7068 9 днів тому

    תודה לך. זה טוב מאוד

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 9 днів тому

      אני שמח לשמוע את זה

  • @joesprinkle
    @joesprinkle Місяць тому

    While I have learned much from Lewis, I don't entirely agree with him on the curses in the Psalms. I quoted him where I liked him but passed over where I found him less helpful. My own view owes much to my teacher Walter Kaiser.

  • @mrtdiver
    @mrtdiver Місяць тому

    10:37 You bring up C.S. Lewis regarding another subject matter (taking seriously - right & wrong). But on the imprecatory or cursing psalms Lewis said, they “are indeed devilish” and: “We must not either try to explain them away or to yield for one moment to the idea that, because it comes in the Bible, all this vindictive hatred must somehow be good and pious. We must face both facts squarely. The hatred is there - festering, gloating, undisguised - and also we should be wicked if we in any way condoned or approved it.” (C.S. Lewis, Reflections on the Psalms) Your video presented some good information on the Imprecatory Psalms.

  • @meskaraireang3565
    @meskaraireang3565 Місяць тому

    Thank you i find this video is so useful

  • @momochakhwoirakpam4266
    @momochakhwoirakpam4266 Місяць тому

    Hello.... Sir i need the notes

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle Місяць тому

      Email me. Go to my UA-cam page www.youtube.com/@joesprinkle and click on "more" under my name, and then click on "show email address". Then email me your request and I will send you the file.

  • @momochakhwoirakpam4266
    @momochakhwoirakpam4266 Місяць тому

    Can I get the notes please?

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle Місяць тому

      Give me your email and I will gladly send as an attachment.

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle Місяць тому

      Email me. Go to my UA-cam page www.youtube.com/@joesprinkle and click on "more" under my name, and then click on "show email address". Then email me your request and I will send you the file.

  • @momochakhwoirakpam4266
    @momochakhwoirakpam4266 2 місяці тому

    Please do provide the PFD file, that would be very helpful. thank you 👍

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 2 місяці тому

      Give me your email and I will send it to you.

  • @tehray3094
    @tehray3094 2 місяці тому

    Thank you for your informative lecture! It's so interesting to learn the history of the development of the hypothesis.

  • @jessecamping
    @jessecamping 2 місяці тому

    Great stuff again!

  • @larrybedouin2921
    @larrybedouin2921 2 місяці тому

    The title Deuteronomy, derived from Greek, thus means a “copy,” or a “repetition,” of the law rather than “second law,” as the word's etymology seems to suggest.

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 2 місяці тому

      Point taken. Longman/Dillard explain in more detail as follows: "The name of this book of the Bible comes from a Greek compound that means “second law” or “repetition of the law.” Ironically, it derives from a misunderstanding in the Septuagint of a Hebrew phrase in Deuteronomy 17:18, where the king is instructed to make a “copy of this law.” Although the title of the book rests on a mistranslation in the Septuagint, it is nevertheless a fortuitous error, since Deuteronomy contains a second version of the law delivered on Mount Sinai as recorded in Exodus, Leviticus, and Numbers." Tremper Longman III and Raymond B. Dillard, An Introduction to the Old Testament, Second Edition. (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan, 2007), 102.

  • @Easternromanfan
    @Easternromanfan 3 місяці тому

    Good research and nice lecture

  • @odar9729
    @odar9729 3 місяці тому

    Is there any artifacts out there for the migration of Israel to America. Many Mormons have this idea from when people wanted to answer where the native americas came from. I have a Paleolithic anthropology degree so not my area lol

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 3 місяці тому

      Not that I know of. There is some contrary evidence in the the Egyptian text used to "translate" the Mormon document called the Book of Abraham which was purported to be Smith's translation of an Egyptian papyrus, a papyrus later returned to the Mormon church by the Metropolitan Museum in New York. This "translation" was before Egyptian had been deciphered, reduced to grammar and widely taught. Joseph Smith found in the text a story about Abraham, Joseph and an alleged daughter of Pharaoh, but the text is known by Egyptologists to be a copy of the Egyptian Book of the Dead with nothing in it related to the Bible. It looks like Smith just looked at the hieroglyphs and made up a story from his imagination, showing no supernatural ability to translate the text. That native Americans, who have no distinctively Jewish DNA, are descendants from the lost tribes of Israel, also seems unlikely. Though there is no doubt Israelite blood mixed among the peoples of Mesopotamia among which the northern tribes of Israel were deported by Assyria and subsequently assimilated, intermarried and merged, there is no reason to suppose they migrated from Mesopotamia to the Americas.

    • @odar9729
      @odar9729 3 місяці тому

      @@joesprinkle thank you

  • @gowdsake7103
    @gowdsake7103 3 місяці тому

    So still nothing from jesus or moses then

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 3 місяці тому

      The lecture is for an Old Testament course so I did not try to discuss New Testament archaeology which would require a complete lecture of its own. We do have an inscription of Pilate, the Ossuary of Caiphas, buidings in Masada and Herodium and Hebron built by Herod, Herod's temple retaining wall (the "wailing wall"), physical evidence of someone who was crucified (man named Jehohanan not Jesus). From there we have ancient, non-Christian extra-biblical writings that speak of Jesus (Josephus, the Talmud, Tacitus, Pliny) that loosely fits into archaeology and the NT.

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 3 місяці тому

      For Moses, there is no archaeological evidence, though the name Moses is likely Egyptian in the pattern of Thut-Moses and Ah-Moses and Ra-Moses in which "moses" means begotten of (the god Thoth, Ah, Re etc.) so he fits into the name pattern of the day. See my video introduction to Exodus where I discuss further.

    • @lishaizion
      @lishaizion 3 місяці тому

      Moses wrote the last book of the 5 books of Torah is written in his perspective and his language

  • @Booger-Magnolia
    @Booger-Magnolia 3 місяці тому

    This was a very fun watch. Thank you for sharing your knowledge with the world!

  • @braix7405
    @braix7405 3 місяці тому

    What a treat! Will you be making more videos on Biblical Archaeology?

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 3 місяці тому

      Thanks. Not sure when or if I will do more in this area, but glad you liked what I posted.

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 3 місяці тому

      I do have one more on biblical archaeology coming July 10 (tomorrow). Some archaeology content here and there scattered in my historical book lectures.

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 3 місяці тому

      I do have one more on biblical archaeology coming July 10 (tomorrow). Some archaeology content here and there scattered in my historical book lectures.

  • @TunaseChristian
    @TunaseChristian 3 місяці тому

    you have really done a great job

  • @exegeticalapologetics4970
    @exegeticalapologetics4970 4 місяці тому

    Love your channel! Thank you for going strong. We would be honored to have ya in our discord! God Bless!

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 4 місяці тому

      I have not worked with discord so I am unsure what to say. Glad you are liking my work. I created them for a couple of online courses I teach. Feel free to copy and use as you wish.

  • @GMGMGMGMGMGMGMGMGMGM
    @GMGMGMGMGMGMGMGMGMGM 5 місяців тому

    "Canon" simply means the books that are read in the liturgy. So canon develops organically over time along with the rest of Holy Tradition. There is no ecumenical council that ever declared an official canon. Churches tended to inherit whatever canon was being used by their local Jewish diaspora community, and there were different sets of texts being used during Second Temple Judaism varying with region. Thinking of the canon as a definitive, closed, anthology from which faith flows is a post-Protestant notion of scripture. The canon is that which is fruitful to read in Church. The relationship flows from Church to canon, not canon to Church. The Church decides what to read. While this has generally been the same set of works throughout the world, even up to the 8th century there were lists of canons that do not match the present works we currently call the canon. There was never a definitive moment where the canon was declared. It’s just an organic consensus. The Western Latin church didn't exist before the Frankish theologians began to innovate for political reasons in order to, in Charlemagne's words, "create a new religion with which to evangelise the Slavs" in opposition to Constantinople. The Eastern Orthodox churches are the only ones which have maintained the continuity of apostolic succession, Holy Tradition, ritual & liturgical worship practices of the undivided 1st millennium church (which continue the lineage of the 1st & 2nd temple OT liturgical worship of God) so you should be looking to Orthodoxy as the standard for comparison, not the Germanised churches of the west which are all less than 1000 years old.

  • @bguman
    @bguman 5 місяців тому

    What authority did men have 1500 years after Christ to dismiss 7 books from scripture?

  • @ApocalypticShowPony
    @ApocalypticShowPony 5 місяців тому

    Is it too late to exclude the book of Genesis?

  • @mrtdiver
    @mrtdiver 5 місяців тому

    Belief in millions of years is incongruent with the Bible. 47:03 See Answers in Genesis for evidence of a young earth. Also Ken Ham. This was a good study. A lot to think about from Proverbs 30.

  • @hermanq.5271
    @hermanq.5271 6 місяців тому

    Thank you so much for the teaching on Ps. 126. Especially the tense-less nature of Hebrew verbs; and challenge of determining the etymology of shuv. Good job!

  • @samuelcream7166
    @samuelcream7166 6 місяців тому

    The question remains? Are we being obedient To the New Spiritual Priesthood Covenant- Heb 7:12, Paul's Glorious Gospel, The Glorious Gospel of Christ, The Glorious Gospel of God, Being offered To each of us? To that form of doctrine: Romans 6:17 NOT: 2 Cor 2 Cor 11:4 Note: HIS Commandments- 1 Cor 14:37 The Book of Life =Paul's Gospel Judged by Paul's Gospel- Romans 2:16 Books Opened-Rev 29:12

  • @jenna2431
    @jenna2431 6 місяців тому

    It takes real hubris for a new religion to take the holy book of another religion and go ""Nuh-uh ".

  • @lloydgush
    @lloydgush 6 місяців тому

    Hard for the samaritan torah to be superior due to the sacarcity of resources, but there's certainly parts where it should be superior.

  • @lloydgush
    @lloydgush 6 місяців тому

    They lost the torah from the codex? How? A progrom?

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 6 місяців тому

      Good question. To quote Wikipedia on the Aleppo Codex, "The fate of the codex during the subsequent decade is unclear: when it resurfaced in Israel in 1958, roughly 40% of the manuscript-including the majority of the Torah section-was missing, and only two additional leaves have been recovered since then. The original supposition that the missing pages were destroyed in the synagogue fire has increasingly been challenged, fueling speculation that they survive in private hands." Wikipedia links to a NYT article calling this a "High Holy Who-done-it" mystery. We may never know what happened to it.

    • @lloydgush
      @lloydgush 6 місяців тому

      @@joesprinkle F antisemiticpedia. Reference their sources instead.

  • @rickjohnson9456
    @rickjohnson9456 6 місяців тому

    Joe its upsetting Some way around the line Christians stopped giving importance to hebrew orignal scripts. I feel sadden alot by God i am Sadden the orignal Hebrew bibile ❤ always will live in our life. Love you Christians May God help us finding Him. Ameen

  • @rickjohnson9456
    @rickjohnson9456 6 місяців тому

    ❤ i am a Muslim from Pakistan and reading this great Effort i love Orignal Christianity ❤❤❤❤❤❤

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 6 місяців тому

      Hope you find these videos informative

    • @Brian-kr1pt
      @Brian-kr1pt 6 місяців тому

      Original christianity (practiced by jews) and Islam are basically the same.

  • @DrBob1611
    @DrBob1611 9 місяців тому

    I’m interested in knowing more of the history behind the Second Rabbinic Bible of 1524-1525. And the Rabbinical Texts history. Thanks

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 9 місяців тому

      On a popular level here is some more: biblemanuscriptsociety.com/Bible-resources/Early-Bibles/Rabbinic-Bible

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 9 місяців тому

      An In-Depth analysis is the work by C. D. Ginsberg. Available on books.google.com -- books.google.com/books?id=ZYgJqQG44PUC&printsec=frontcover&dq=C.D.+Ginsburg,+Introduction+to+the+Massoretico-critical+edition+of+the+Hebrew+Bible&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiYgOObudqDAxXQGDQIHc8VDioQ6AF6BAgGEAI#v=onepage&q&f=false

  • @btbb3726
    @btbb3726 Рік тому

    Hello Dr. Sprinkle I just found your channel. I had you as a professor back at TFC in the late 80’s - early 90’s.

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle Рік тому

      A[ways good to hear from former students

  • @AlexKnowles-p4n
    @AlexKnowles-p4n Рік тому

    Could the church reform today

  • @KingKing01
    @KingKing01 Рік тому

    I wish I had heard this before I went into university, in which there was no defense given whatsoever for Mosaic or substantial Mosaic authorship.

  • @jj74qformerlyjailbreak3
    @jj74qformerlyjailbreak3 Рік тому

    You are the light of the world.

  • @benth162
    @benth162 Рік тому

    Not only do you not know who your Gods are, you have no idea "What" your gods are. And here you tout yourself to be an PhD. I used God in the plural because it also says so in Genesis. A word there implied that there was not "A" god but many. Or do you believers just ignore that part because it does not fit in with the narrative you WANT to believe. How can a man received a PhD in a subject that he actually knows so little about. Your bible is nothing but conjecture and assumptions, in other words Fairy Tales, which were designed as a mechanism to keep the animalistic humans under control, to try and convince Homosapiens to be civil with each other. Obviously it didn't work because humans are just as animalistic as they have always been and war upon each other AS THEY ALWAYS HAVE !!! The advanced geneticist who put homo-sapiens together left a lot out otherwise we would not sill be acting as we do.

  • @PinasNews
    @PinasNews Рік тому

    You interpreted Pilgrims theory as best interpretation based on evidences from songs of ascent Psalm itself. A great learning. Thanks a lot.

  • @ruachnaim0305
    @ruachnaim0305 Рік тому

    Thank you for this video.

  • @LaurelsCurls
    @LaurelsCurls 2 роки тому

    Hi there. I realize this course was from a few years ago, but I wonder if you can tell me if there is an answer guide to all of the exercises in Ross' book published anywhere? You mentioned your own guide available for your class, but I am just trying to study Ross' textbook solo so I don't have access to your school's online system. I also recently purchased the Supplementary Exercises for Ross' text and was hoping it would have an answer guide, but it does not. Any assistance on where to find such resources would be lovely. Thank you.

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 2 роки тому

      Not everything, but selected answers are found here. biblicallanguages.net/language-courses-i-teach/hebrew-grammar-i-first-year-course/answer-keys-to-ross-introducing-biblical-hebrew-ibh/

    • @LaurelsCurls
      @LaurelsCurls 2 роки тому

      @@joesprinkle Thank you so much! As I mentioned, I'm just slowly working through Ross' book on my own then watching your lectures after I complete each section. I've always wanted to learn some Biblical Hebrew and now that I'm 40, the time is ripe to do so!! Your lectures are very helpful and adds clarity to what I'm reading in Ross. Please don't remove this lecture series from your channel. Thank you again!

  • @mitchellc4
    @mitchellc4 2 роки тому

    Hello There’s no “fully God and fully man” Jesus is the Messiah The Son of God The Son of David The Son of man The man God has chosen to be his anointed king The man God will judge the world through The man God raised from the dead Jesus will return and rule the nations with believers in the kingdom of God on the earth Jesus has a God There is no triune god in scripture Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent. - Acts 3 13 The God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and of Jacob, the God of our fathers, hath glorified his Servant Jesus; whom ye delivered up, and denied before the face of Pilate, when he had determined to release him. 14 But ye denied the Holy and Righteous One, and asked for a murderer to be granted unto you, 15 and killed the Prince of life; whom God raised from the dead; whereof we are witnesses. Notice Jesus is NOT the God of Abraham 13 The God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and of Jacob, the God of our fathers, hath glorified his Servant Jesus; whom ye delivered up, and denied before the face of Pilate, when he had determined to release him.

  • @jonas3598
    @jonas3598 2 роки тому

    I stumbled upon channel. I know zero Hebrew but looking forward to learning something from your channel!

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 2 роки тому

      Enjoy

    • @jonas3598
      @jonas3598 2 роки тому

      @@joesprinkle I am currently reading “Recalling The Hope Of Glory” By Allen P Ross and found your page!

  • @adugnachalla3507
    @adugnachalla3507 2 роки тому

    very detail and very ineterting. God bless you indeed.

  • @henrystevenson7429
    @henrystevenson7429 2 роки тому

    thank you very much I must write a research paper Describe and explain the context of biblical Hermeneutics from the wider context (place in the canon) to the narrower context (Lexico-grammatical context)

  • @shaiventures2274
    @shaiventures2274 2 роки тому

    Hello Dr. Joe, I am a Bible School student. I am having a hard time understanding my research and readings, but your videos helped me a lot. You are appreciated, and keep doing what you are doing for the Gospel. A blessed day to you <3

  • @nccfidelity1634
    @nccfidelity1634 2 роки тому

    Thank you for this work sir! I really appreciate it. . . .

  • @jaymond80
    @jaymond80 2 роки тому

    Thank you for this video Dr. It is much appreciated & valuable information.

  • @davidbarber3821
    @davidbarber3821 2 роки тому

    Dang u just glossed right over the ו is waw & the consonant is a "w" not "v"

    • @joesprinkle
      @joesprinkle 2 роки тому

      In the modern Israeli Sephardic pronunciation system spoken today in Israel, the letter originally pronounced waw and transliterated with /w/ has come to be pronounced vav and transliterated with /v/. I was taught that system at Hebrew Union College and it has the advantage of being the form of Hebrew actually spoken today. However you are correct to point out that the letter was originally a waw not a vav.

  • @davidbarber3821
    @davidbarber3821 2 роки тому

    I've bought the IBH from watching Charles Grebe YT series Animated Hebrew

  • @amyash2744
    @amyash2744 2 роки тому

    Could you please add an email address to your profile? I'm a former student of yours and would like to contact you.

  • @joesprinkle
    @joesprinkle 3 роки тому

    Next video on Daniel: ua-cam.com/video/y-xXGB6Z5_A/v-deo.html . Also see the playlist for Ezekiel/Daniel here ua-cam.com/video/GjRBsgC3zmI/v-deo.html