Support Court- Daycare expense in lieu of child support
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 вер 2024
- Hannah and Richard have been doing a split custody agreement where the children were with each parent during the day and at night. Hannah's work schedule changed and she wishes to put the children in daycare for the day. Should either parent have to pay child support? Check it out!
Lmao the dad in the background with the hand sanitizer 😂😂😂😂 the ex wife like really dude!
hjnjbbbbnbbbnnbnbnnnnnnjnnnbnnnnnnbnbnn
nnnnnn nnnnnn.n bnnnnnnnnbn9bnnnnnnnbnnn
Is it staged
@@User_Rogan_Revolution_Realm yes, the cases are real but reenacted with actors here
@@debbiehadrava204 just
Yo the end straight killed me on this one! The dad spreads a 10 pump of sanitizer onto his hands while he's shooting looks of disgust at the people on either side of him.. absolute comedic gold.
Curious how he did during covid….
@@amandasutherland626 hahaha he probably vacuum sealed himself into his house.
😂😂
You can also see the ex-wife mouthing 'Really' twice as she watches him do that.
Dude, the one guy next to him reeling back as he saw how much hand sanitizer he used.
The way she sips her tea gives me life. She be like really *sip
DeAndre Jones girl not even drinking nothing 😂😂😂
@@queenb8309 exactly lol. She had me fooled for a few episodes.
That double-handed sip and nod 😅😅 i love her
I love it when the judge sips her tea! Always makes me smile!
Me too❤ It
I bet he went crazy when the pandemic broke out .
Good thing it’s fake
Oh. My. God. I wouldn’t even wanna imagine a germ o Phoebe rn
Did you see the father when the judge was talking to us He was just behind her A few germs for kids are not a bad thing in my opinion
@@certifiedpumps232 the case itself it’s real
Probably needed therapy
I'm scared of germs, too. But, my kids went to daycare. And, it builds up their immune system.
My daughter went to daycare for two years from age 3. The thing is, once kids begin to mix, they bring germs home. The same as when they go to school. Kids are germ merchants. So after she started day care, *I* started to get sick more, so the guy actually has a point. Perhaps he is worried for his job if he needs extra time off due to things he might catch from his kids. I’m self employed, but I can see how it could be an issue.
I noticed the OP was pre COVID lol. Bet their mindset changed really fast.
@@karenkelly8700 True.
As a person who actually attended daycare I hated it. It was like going to another school after school. My husband and I chose our jobs to be able to work without needing to use daycare. I understand some people have no choice but for our situation, I thought of our work schedule prior to us having kids.
@@ashleywilkes545 What does this have to do with germs? I went to daycare, too. It wasn't bad. I went in the eighties
I don’t think this was a fair reconciliation. He has a valid point they split the time and if he had placed the children in daycare during the time he has them he would simply pay it. She took a different work schedule and instead of working with him to swap times where he would take them during the day and she would take them at night she opted to place them in daycare-so she’s pretty much not going to have them since they’d be leaving and going to him after. And when the judge brought up child support he should’ve said “yes, base child support to each other off of each of our pays” since she would’ve had to make
The mother pay as well since they have shared custody
Not to mention that her times will change again so then what?
I agree!
Completely agree
OP, you have no idea if they attempted to work out schedules, if anything it actually sounds like they did but it just didnt work. They could also already be at an adjusted time.
THAT said, i will agree that i felt the judgement was wrong. But for one reason and one reason only.
That man clearly has a rather severe personality disorder and this is something that should be taken care of by the state.
@@undergrounddojokeyboardcag701 Again it doesn’t change the fact they have shared custody and evenly split the time they have with the children. During the time they are in his care if he has to utilize childcare he pays for it as it’s during his designated time and she wouldn’t be paying it. She is fully aware of how they split their time with the children. She chose to take a rotation that would affect her ability to care for the children when they were in her possession so she opted to place them in childcare. While that is her right to do during the time the children are in her custody there are two things that should not be affected by it. One of them being his time with the children, his designated time shouldn’t be affected in order to accommodate her decrease in physical time with the kids. His financial contributions also shouldn’t be affected. This is not a situation where she is the primary custodial guardian and he’s a weekend and holiday father and she has to rely on childcare to ensure she’s able to financially support them full time. I hate my ex husband, absolutely loathe him, we still have joint 50/50 custody. Neither of us received child support nor do we receive reimbursement for child care costs. We both care for the children for half of the month every month. This is an instance where the best interest of the children was not being taken into consideration or how it would effect them. I also know in the state I reside in given the shared custody she actually wouldn’t be able to place the kids in childcare without his approval as they would both have to consent to allowing the outside party access to the children. That’s something people also seem to forget, every state doesn’t default to this mindset and some are actually fairer in their rulings regarding the parents in these cases. I would actually urge him to use this ruling as proof that it would be in the children’s best interest to reside with him on a full time basis.
I love the judges eyes when she sips her tea... It always brings me a smile
That dad has no idea that keeping kids in a sterile environment all the time would actually make them more susceptible to disease later on in life, making uneventful colds a life-threatening situation for them. If I had a parent like that in my classroom, id have social services called. I’m surprised the mom didn’t prescribe the kids to go out and run around in the dirt around farm animals-it’s fantastic at that age for allergy prevention.
Technically you can't take a person's child away because of a mental disorder unless it is interfering with the care of a child. We don't know that it is yet with him. But the good news is that because they have shared custody the mom has the right to make choices without his permission as long as she has the judge backing her up. Which she does. I'm not massively worried about the kids unless his OCD escalates. At that point, the mom can file for full custody with him having supervised visitation. And then he'd be ordered to pay child support which is actually more than what he's paying now at only $500/month. So if he's smart he won't let it get out of hand and he'll follow what the judge says.
She should pay. Since he practically will have the kids full time. It call child support
How do you figure that? He only has them half the time. The rest of the time they're either going to be with her or at daycare. Daycare isn't the father's time. That's her time. I actually feel bad for her doing that. She probably wanted to switch the hours and he probably refused to do so because he clearly has OCD. OCD people don't do well with change. It has to do with that they constantly try to control everything. She's going to be missing out on time with her kids. She can't be happy about that.
@@jessicaarmstrong5035 so she should pay daycare, this was very very unfair, assuming they have joint custody.
@@rayhaanalykhan bruh! by that logic, since children go to school in day time, mother should pay?
@@souraldandothi5681 that cancels out because children sleep at night
How is it the children are only 6 months apart…..18 month old and a two year old
Just LOVE the "dad" looking at the guy sitting next to him like he's about to catch ebola or something from him! Too funny.
If they have a shared custody agreement in which she is responsible for the children during the day and he is responsible at night then why would he have to pay half of the cost of child care during the day? If he hired a nanny to what them at night so he could sleep interrupted would she have to share in that cost as well?
Victor Hagan my thoughts exactly
Women damn near always get benefitted from child support
Exactly that shit ain't right that shit should be all on her to pay
Exactly
My husband had to pay for day care even though he was available to care for his daughter during the day and worked nights. The judge said “mom feels it would be beneficial for daughter to go to day care” so even though he already paid support, he had to pay for the child care bill as well. Keep in mind, this was “needed” because mom just wanted it. She didn’t work but would not allow my husband to have her some days.
This was not fair to the Father, it was the Mother's choice to put them in daycare during the time she agreed to have them, he has the children at night and not has to pay for her decision to work during the day. That isn't fair.
10000% day care is horrible
It is not fair at all!!!! It is she failing to the agreement to take care of them
How is that not fair if he doesn’t want them in a daycare then maybe he should keep them through the day she works as well
She said her job doesn't allow her to stay at home during the day.... she's a doctor.... so how is it not fair?
@@candaceharmon2919 Exactly she is a doctor so she has to work during the day
One of the very few times i dont agree with what was done. If i were him i would get a lawyer. He may have made out better dropping the BS about dirty daycare just gone on his last argument about he takes care of kids during his time she should pay for daycare during her time.
jim hike That’s just it when it comes to child support. Judges have plenty of discretion and can order what they believe is in the child’s best interest. Google §154.123 of the Texas Family Code.
Support Court with Judge Vonda B. If she a doctor why can’t she paid it herself? Why could he get full custody and she pays if the father have them overnight? Why he play half if make 3x as much. Should it 30:70 or a 25:75 for pay?
CMJack Bauer Great question!
Child support and custody are two different things. She being a doctor is irrelevant. Judges have discretion to do what’s in the child’s best interest and in this case, the judge believed it was fair for the parties to split the cost.
I under stand all that and i think the laws and judges lean toward punishing men. And with the big differance in income should give him some child suport so the kid has the same quality of life at both homes. As it is she has the disposable income to be the supper parent he does not. That reflects on kids as they grow up mom did everything for me took me places and bought me things dad did very little. You know that and every person that has had a divorce. She offerd to have him pay child suport but didnt offer to have her pay xhild auport to him based on her salary rather than pay the day care. How is that not favoring the woman? Im sure her xhild auport would be more than $1,000 mo.
Good thing this is a fake court case
So if the Dad wants to get Pizza during his time can he send her HALF the bill?
The judge is caught up on how 'cheap' to BABYSITTING service is...but the judge FAILS to realize the mother just got OVER
They agreed upon SHARED custody based upon day parts...
He was responsible for NIGHTS
She was responsible for DAYS
So now...he still has NIGHTS 100%
Yet, she now doesn't have DAYS anymore because she unilaterally chose to outsource her day part to a babysitting service...and to make matters WORSE....he has to actually pay HALF of the bill SHE chose to incur, in order to NOT have true custody during her SHARED child time.
Again, if Dad goes on dates and uses a babysitter at NIGHT during 'his' shared time...I'd hope your honor would see it the EXACT same way and award HIM 50% of 'that' reasonably priced babysitting just the same....because it is EXACTLY the same scenario.
I'm sure he'll find a 'nationally' accredited sitter of 1 & 2 year olds...😂
He might as well ask for full custody bc he has them every single night and she will barely have them when theyre in daycare if they are gonna be in daycare anyway and he is paying for it might as well have main custody instead of half and half
yeh - seems unfair as he's still doing nights - at first I thought nights would be easy as people sleep then but not with babies! - if he couldn't do nights would she pay?
AGREED
100% agree! This is the first verdict I didn’t agree with. Dad takes care of nights on hundred percent and now mom needs help with her half of the day, so why is it fair that dad has to pay for a half of the daycare she got for HER time. I would say the same thing if they had a nanny. If the nanny is only there during the day then she should be responsible, if it was a night nurse that is only there at nights, the dad should be responsible
Totally agree
If she had them during the day and that’s the agreement he shouldn’t have to be paying for day care
She could not have to pay daycare by herself because her job changed her hours that is not her fault
Just because the responsibility is split in half doesn't make them only half his children... They both are still 100% responsible
@@mayiamcclain3172 ....if that's there agreement that she has them during the day and he at nights that should be all on her because that's the time she's suppose to have them he's still doing his part
I don’t think he should be paying daycare
He doesn't want to pay for childcare and it doesn't want to pay for the child then he shouldn't get to see the child
@@CJAYstonerted if he can watch the kids during the day why is he posting because she can’t watch during her allotted time that’s not his fault
@@CJAYstonerted The thing is when you have an agreement that has been working and your situation changes its the responsibility of the parent who has the changes. Cause at the end of the day he is still going to have them every night. She is getting off not having to be bothered with her own kids and getting paid for it.
@@CJAYstonerted ....STFU U SOUND STUPID AND THE PEOPLE THAT GAVE YOU A THUMBS UP
@@katinabell4464 ..... EXACTLY
What keeps kids healthy is being around germs I’m surprised as a dr she didn’t say that
Don’t be stupid.
Oh she probably has and knows that it's useless to explain it to him. People with OCD aren't rational. Their underlying issue is control. He's afraid of germs because he can't control them and can't stop his kids from getting sick. Nothing about that is rational and trying to "explain" only frustrates them and they will become more and more stubborn the more you "explain". There are components of delusion with people who have OCD. You can't talk to them until they're willing to listen to what you say.
I think she should pay for day care. Why does he pay child support if they split the kids 50/50?
He isnt paying any CS
Jesse Grider because they split.
He hurried up and said"(then no").😂😂😂that's it i died
My thing is they should decide on a daycare they both agree on if he has to pay for it
He doesn’t want any daycare. He want to drop them off on his family members with strict precautions.
Yes and no. Because he could just continue to refuse to agree. But the court could order they have a month to find one they both like or something and if he doesn't agree her choice gets it lol
I agree. They are BOTH the parents and while it DOES sound like a nice daycare, the children are very young and I see his point that maybe it would be best if they stayed with family.....or he at least needs to have an equal voice in where the children go to be cared for. I went to daycare. I very much enjoyed it. We made friends there. We got the opportunity to socialize. He's not even giving this a chance. He's just judging it to be dirty and unfit without even looking at it first.
What if he had a daycare at night for the children, would she have to split it with him also? Don't seem quite right if he has them at night and he gets nothing for taking care of the kids but she gets money for daycare where she is not taking care of the kids.
Being a crazy germaphobe he'd never agree to one. Is he going to homeschooling them because schools are full of germs? Will they be forbidden from ever leaving 5he house because of germs?
I understand the logic but it's not fair, to the man...
I agree with him why should he have to help cover her watching the kids during the day
Exactly if she's suppose to have the kids during the day then that should be on her not him because he's still doing his part and what they agreed on
Agreed. He shouldn't cover expenses during her Tim when he has them equal time. Unfair
you know that woman needs to work, right? He has the kids during the night... they are sleeping. She is the one that does most of the work during day time. Yes, no child support... but who pays for that womans rent, her expences etc? If she works only the nightshift, so he can get his will and she takes care of the children during the day... when exactly would she have time to sleep?
He wants a SAHM for his children, but didnt pay her (not the child) for staying home... doesnt work that way.
Also he looks more like someone who works in an office (with his phobia etc)...so no nightshift for him...
In bonus point most people dont understand: Shared Time means also shared expenses for the children for ALL activities... (Daycare, School, Hobbies) outside the home. In our country its actually the law, you have split custody 50-50 than you pay half of ALL expenses for the kid as well! Only if you havent 50-50 one pays the other child support on a monthly basis 🤣
@@felic86kaufmann57 I’m not reading all that the man not receiving help or complaining why should she
@@charlesayers3177 because split custody 50-50 means the both need to pay 50-50 for ALL the expences outside the homes.... simple. kids cost money . clothing, school supplies, medical etc. Kids cost a lot more than some rent, food and water. If you pay only child support its because you dont have 50-50 so you pay one sum for ALL cost (in- and outside the home based on your income) If HE want her to stay home, than he can pay her her earnings that she will lose OR he can shift his workshift... simple. As long as she needed to work, he needed to pay half of all cost for daycare, school-/schoolsupllies etc. If a parent not even want to pay that, than they should use a condome...simple
Man, what is that Dad going to do when the kids have to start regular elementary school. He definitely needs some serious therapy. I feel so sad for those children. 😥
why was she not paying the child support? she had decided to take care of children in the day but they are in daycare now and at night they will be with their day ..? why?
He should have said then give me full custody and then request for child support
Because of $500 you’ll try to take your kids away from their mom? Y’all really be after money and don’t care about the children’s emotions. Some people shouldn’t have kids
@@olicesa0137 ....YOU SOUND STUPID THAT'S NOT WHY BUT YOUR A WOMAN SO
@@olicesa0137 the mother shouldn’t have because she’s to busy at work.
@@fahmishaibi5063then doctors should never have kids?
@@olicesa0137 Mother should have emotions enough to take care of her own children.
no no no, not right for father, now he's paying for her time in the morning. bad call judge
Just curious, if they have split custody wouldn't the judge have to calculate both of their child support payments and then the difference would go to the the party that makes less??
Dude stayed in character till the end
He is right ! Daycare vs home care is night and day in the development of the children
That ruling is not within the bounds of the law in any state. They arrangement is clearly shared custody. Unless the parents agreed, then there is not a payment in lieu of child support. In there cases, they put it in form of child support. The daycare cost is added to the child support calculation. The cost is based on the amount of money each parent make. Its literally the amount of offset income. The Dr would end up paying the most of the daycare cost and it would be in form of child support to the other parent. This would be overturned on appeal in a heartbeat because even in Texas, the state is required to add addition cost to the child support formula. The reason they do this is because this is the only way they can seek payments through title 4 funding.
t t Unfortunately, it wouldn’t change on appeal and it didn’t.
What appeal case is this? I would like to read the appeal. If the appeals court didn't not overturn this then they are way in the wrong and every man who makes a higher income than the custodial parent can use that appeal case as precedent to reason that they should not pay a higher portion of child care expenses simply case they make more. Please give me the name of the appeals case you are referring to. Most child support always try to reason that the higher income parent should pay the most just because they make more. I really would like a case I can reference where the appeals court didn't agree that the higher income parent shouldn't pay more of the cost when they clearly made more money.
t t In Texas after a temporary orders hearing (hearings held before associate judges-Dallas county), a party can request a de novo appeal (must be requested in 3 days following the hearing), and have the temporary hearing redone. Those appeals don’t make it to the appellate courts. They are heard before the district court.
That's really not a appeal. I am referring to the appellate courts. They routinely uphold that the parent who makes the most money pays most of the cost. Most of the time its the non-custodial parent who makes the most(problaby cause they don't have the kid that much) so I don't see why a appellate court would rule in the Dr favor on this. Every noncustodial parent out there would use that ruling if they did that so I don't see a appellate court not reversing this decision. Not having this Dr pay most of the cost would open up a big can of worms.
I agree with what you said. He should not have had to pay. Let it be split. She would have to pay
I need to get in her court room. I have a 5yr old. Her father has done NOTHING for her since the day she was born. He thinks since he calls her whenever he feels like it. He shouldn't have to pay money. Any talk about money the father always have an attitude
Sounds like my situation I been dealing with child support for 4 years in GA and my son is 5. I haven't gotten a dime. Only a box of clothes and a pair of shoes yearly.
That's not fair at all to the father he has his kids at night so he should be responsible for the night if she wants daycare she should pay
Loved the way he committed to the character in the end with the hand sanitizer
Yup...what a crap actor 😆 🤣
I think she should pay for day care. She is supposed to take care of the children ding the day.....
Thanks for the knowledge that you share, it has helped me with understanding the child support system even though I'm another state.
You’re very welcome!🤗
If he has the kids at night and they are in daycare in the day when do she have them
She works hello
Since he has them all night and they are at daycare during the day he should have custody and she has a parenting schedule.
If she a doctor why can’t she paid it herself? Why could he get full custody and she pays if the father have them overnight? Why she he play half if make 3x as much. Should it 30:70 or a 25:75 for pay?
@@QueenTiffinee so when do she get the child again you replied as if working is a reason every body work
Tiffinee Brown well that really doesn’t answer Khy’s question, does it?
The guy should file for full custody, since she doesn't have the time or don't want to spend time with the kids and have her pay child support plus insurance from her almost 200k salary. Then he can get his family to look after the kids in the day. The judgement should not be because it's just 500 it's the principle.
EXACTLY! She's not spending any time with the kids. If the roles were reversed she would NOT have made her pay anything because she would have claimed it would negatively impact her standard of living and quality of life. The judges don't even see how gender bias they are against men.
Oh, I missed that.. did they say what her salary was?
Germs are one thing, but abuse and neglect are real reasons to be scared of daycares but the same can happen with "family" you have to compromise sometimes when you have children and not all the means you want to live how you feel you need
Fmaily is always better than Daycare.
If they are supposed to be with mom during the day...she should pay it. This was soooo unfair
Now im wondering, if he hire a babysitter to watch them at night when he wants to go out... does she have to pay half of it?
smelther Either way, they will spilt the cost of daycare.
Support Court with Judge Vonda B. That’s not fair that’s her decision to make it easier for her to go to work no one is forcing her bt she wants home to help pay for her to go to work
@@angeljosephs30 ....right i know I'm late on this but exactly if they had agreement that she watching them during the day and he has them at night why should he have to pay for it i feel like that should be on her not him because he's still doing his part if her schedule changes then she should be the only one paying daycare because that's her time when she's suppose to have the kids
@Ayahna Mangham woulbnt be saying tht if it was reverse
@Ayahna Mangham it doesn't matter why mom can't watch the children on her time. They have split custody that means each parent is responsible for the children while they are in their care. There's no child support because time is 50/50, it makes no sense for dad to pay for what the kids do on mom's time. And vice versa.
So now the kids don't see their mom Durning her time and he pays for it....but that's not the biggest issue when will the kids have mom time
I don’t agree with the judge on this.the dad was holding up his end and like he said if he needed night care he would have payed
Shared custody means they both have the kids, so when does she have them? I’m confused🤨🤨🤨
When she is off work like most divorced k8ds. He shouldnt have them at all germaphobe thats going to have problems. He wants her to stay home they are not married there is the real issue
she sends them to daycare during her time now, but somehow that was still classified as her time.
I don't think she will be working daytime all of the time. I can agree now that she probably should've paid for the daycare BUT as the judge said her decision was based upon their agreement. HALF TIME=HALF THE COST....
I wonder why he didn't want her to figure out what he really should've been paying according to his 62,000 a year salary!!!😂
@@priscillalopez7480 Because the judge had her head up her butt, not 'thinking' about THIS specific case.
Her female BIAS was showing...when she asked him that STUPID question, he should have said SURE let's based child support on the WIFE'S salary honestly because HE really has custody....if the kids are in daycare during the day and SLEEP at his house....how the F would HE pay 'her' child support?
The judge's head was up her butt forgetting the facts of THIS case, simply ASSuming a more 'traditional' scenario where sbe could squeeze a non-custodial Dad.
In FAIRNESS if they have shared custody and either parent wants to get a Babysitter during THEIR TIME, it should be their responsibility and their bill NOT a shared responsibility.
@@geminieric1662
The judge had the idiotic Tx law in front of her. Equal time Equal pay. If he wants to fight it he should takes it to the court that will change their custodial agreement since she makes more money than him he should get a 60-40 or 70-30.....
I think that she should pay more if she makes more. BOTTOM LINE IS he didn't REALLY care who watched then during her time he just wants it to be free.
This is the first verdict I don’t agree with ...if their agreement was she has them in the day and he has them at night then if she needs daycare then she should pay for it especially as it’s so she can go to work to earn three times more than he does !
Maybe he can have them in the day and her have them at night ?.
Or at least she pays a larger percentage of the daycare cost as she earns so much more than he does ...if he had them more hours she would have to pay him child support ....yet the judge was threatening to put him on child support when they split care 50/50 ?
I do think daycare is great for kids if a good establishment is found ...
She based her judgement on the fact that daycare is like school so it's like paying the school fee, they would have to split the fee, but she ignored the fact that the primary reason for the mom to use daycare was to get assist in her job, not because of learning as she admitted In this video
Moreover by analysing other videos I came to know that she should still be paying him child support because she makes 3x more times as him, even though it's a joint custody.
I think the judge miss the point of why the guy didn't want to pay. If they have an agreement for him to keep the kids at nights everynight and her to keep them during the day every day. I don't think it fair for the guy to be paying for the time she don't want to be spending with her kids. I can understand if it was school expenses, but not for day care when she is not working during the day. And for the judge to have threaten him with child support for kids he is supporting and have 50/50 custody was like rubbing salt in his wounds.
Exactly
Why didnt the judge say that to her at the end as well if she earns a lot more!
If I was an American I wouldn't have children your child support system is scary if your relationship breaks down that hell ain't worth it especially the men they get done over by this system
File for custody since she can't watch the kids in day
I agree.
There are 24 jours in a day 12 hours each work is 8 hours. They have already been to court. Dont think the dad would win in child custody cases germaphobe dont normally win. They lack ablity to completely care for kids. 1 ablity to leave the house emergency happen hed call her. 2 teaching then to be afraid of the outside because of his fears. Ehen they get to school age he will not retain custody.
Plus he doesn't want full custody. Why should he file for sole custody? So he can have one of his relatives watch them for the time that they would've been at daycare. Plus I don't think that the mom will be working days for long. It sounds like she's an on call doctor or an ER doctor.
Very biased judgement on this one. I've only seen 5 so far where you've clearly put your emotion into the case to set a ruling but this is for sure one.
The judge was DEAD WRONG on this one
No she wasn't. They split the time 50/50 so they split the expenses 50/50. End of discussion.
@@jessicaarmstrong5035 She based her judgement on the fact that daycare is like school so it's like paying the school fee, they would have to split the fee, but she ignored the fact that the primary reason for the mom to use daycare was to get assist in her job, not because of learning as she admitted In this video
Moreover by analysing other videos I came to know that she should still be paying him child support because she makes 3x more times as him, even though it's a joint custody.
@@jessicaarmstrong5035 yeah read my other comment too, but I he gets a "night care" during the night, they should also split that. How crazy
@rayhaanalykhan that's not how it works in shared custody. Each parent spends what it takes for everyday living when the kids are with them and any expenses are paid 50/50. What your income level is plays no part in shared custody because you're obviously spending more than if it was a custodial/non-custodial arrangement. I think you misunderstand how shared custody works.
@@jessicaarmstrong5035 please watch other videos of this judge I’ve seen in Atleast one case that even though it was shared custody judge awarded child support to the parent making less amount. Although it’s was not full, I think it she calculated both of their child support then subtracted them, the amount that came was awarded to the parent making less.
If they are 50 50 in spilt time, if she needs care during her time, thats on her. If his job changes she'd owe him? Thats ignorant. The ex should have first right of child care if she cant care for them during her time. Need vs want. Do the kids NEED to be in a mega expensive day care? Yep ,splitting. He pays for expenses incurred during his time and she should pay for expenses during her time. SPLIT. Its a crap decision on this one.
She based her judgement on the fact that daycare is like school so it's like paying the school fee, they would have to split the fee, but she ignored the fact that the primary reason for the mom to use daycare was to get assist in her job, not because of learning as she admitted In this video
Moreover by analysing other videos I came to know that she should still be paying him child support because she makes 3x more times as him, even though it's a joint custody.
@@rayhaanalykhan I spent 20 years as a single dad raising my 3 sons. Courts are able to just bend over backwards for women. Finally at about year 15, the court finally woke up to what shes been doing over the years and put the protective order in place with her only having supervised visits. She eventually didnt even do her visitations. Luckily I had custody. Plenty of crap stories over the years.
@@rushfan9thcmd Did you get child support?
@@rayhaanalykhan barely and not at all. She originally only had to pay 70 a week for all 3 but got over 4000 behind and they began confiscating her tax returns. Then she quit working the court bent over backwards for her and wouldnt find her in contempt. In about the 15th year when i took her to court for violating a court order, we got the court to put the order of protection in temporary and she no showed the following hearings for 9 months. They even were allowing her to just call in. I was at each hearing date for 9 months. The last one they even tried calling her and she wouldnt answer. The court reluctantly made the OP permanent. The last 3 years she didnt have any visitation. Its absolutely amazing watching the courts leniency toward women, not just my ex. I saw the judge tell a guy one day that if he didnt have this certain amount of support paid by the next month, the guy was going to jail. The judge told the guy that he didnt care if the guy had to sell everything and live in a tent. I dont know what happened to that guy. I filed for divorce the day after learning of her plan to lie to police to get me arrested. I called the lawyer first thing that next day. I struck first.
This show feels like a skit, and the end scene with him hand sanitising proved it
If you read the channel description, you will see that all episodes involve actors. It is a "skit" of sorts. That's why Vonda says, near the end, that comments can become scenarios on the show.
@@lilydaquila9847ahh that makes sense thank you (new subscriber, this germaphobe at the end was terrible)
@@lisasmith8484 the cases are mostly real, they are recreated by actors.
I am SOOOOO sick of these people who use the "I have to go save lives" BS - as a justification for them garnering sympathy - but he is delusional and obsessed and deranged.
I expected more from the judge. Maybe she’s starting to change.
Well, this was from two years ago 👀👀
you do know these are all actors right? they are only replaying what actually took place in a court case
If she wants child care during her time then she should be the only one paying. She no longer has the kids. On top of that the judge threaten him with child support when he has the kids more.
Pierre Ashton Threatened? No. It was a simple question. Who complains over $500 when based on actual income, he would pay more?
@@JudgeVondaB My question is and trying to understand is why if they have an equal agreement for both having the children equal time, why does he have to pay for child during her time. She is spending less time with the children so shouldnt she pay more. From what I see is that the father has the kids during his time and has to pay daycare for mothers time. Also, from this the children are with the father more so child support should be of the mother because they are with the father more. Just trying to understand
Pierre Ashton Who said she is actually spending less time? She said she works during the day. Her schedule could be 5am to 1pm which typically means she isn’t completely foregoing seeing the child even a full 12 hours. Based on their testimony, they still have a split agreement.
I’m confused. How is the judge threatening him saying would she like for her to base child support off of his earning when they have shared custody and she makes more? Wouldn’t she be the one who has to pay him child support since she makes me and he has the kids at night and she will no longer have them during the day since they’ll be in school?
Not necessarily.
@@JudgeVondaB you’re just petty sometimes.
@@miekaash6831no. She's following the laws of the Texas courts. Child support and custody is such a tangled mess to figure out that going by the books usually the best way to do it. With her being a Dr, they would be in and out of court every time the hospital puts her on a different rotation getting child support amended. Everyone is so quick to judge, but not think about the reasons behind a decision. You can't make decisions in court based on your feelings. They have a custody agreement in place. Regardless of how much time she is spending with them during her "time" with them, the agreement has to legally be followed. So unless he wants to fight for sole custody and hit her for child support, then the law has to be followed. Sometimes it just sucks.
She based her judgement on the fact that daycare is like school so it's like paying the school fee, they would have to split the fee, but she ignored the fact that the primary reason for the mom to use daycare was to get assist in her job, not because of learning as she admitted In this video
Moreover by analysing other videos I came to know that she should still be paying him child support because she makes 3x more times as him, even though it's a joint custody.
@@juliestrickland7754 This is not feelings, this is just pure logic.
I usually like her decision to but she took away his right as a guardian. So what the hell was the point of him turning up. He seems to be parenting more then her. She cares for the kids during the day but they are in daycare. At night the kids are with him and he cares for them. How is any of this fair????! You got this totally wrong. Poor guy!
His right as a guardian? He’s the parent.🤔
@@JudgeVondaB exactly. And now he’s being forced to pay for something he as a parent doesn’t want his children involved in.
My child’s daycare is 1,200 a month!!!
My daughter paid that amount for after school daycare, 4 hours per day. I retired abd am now able to provide. So expensive!
The judge said that she would base his child support off of his annual salary, but in any other case, if the parents split custody, she rules against child support. LOL. Reality TV has no rules, I reckon.
That's not fair at all,he takes care of his end ,she doesn't so now he has to come up with 500 a month for her,that is just bullshit, system is set up for who ever does the wrong thing sad
nah, this one was definitely off at the end. she’s choosing to put them in daycare when she has them, she should pay…
Germophibic Dad in audience booth washing down with hand sanitizer is hilarious 🤣 😆 😂
The ending scene with him freaking out bout the germs and the guy giving him a bad look 😭😭😭😭😭🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Judge Vonda: I understand sometimes I don’t wanna be here but I’m here… 😂😂😂
This was a terrible reconciliation. If they have a split custody agreement and she can no longer honor that agreement why should he have consequences. And to threaten him with child support when he has split custody was tackie. The germaphobic bit was implemented to make the audience dislike the male character instead of having him use a logical and valid argument.
Never in a court room have I seen a Germaphobe person. That client is crazy!
The mom cracked the code: have "joint" custody so she doesn't pay CS, she's in charge of the kids during the day, and the father during the night, yet in practice she doesn't watch over the kids at all since she's at work, so the father has to pay 50% of the cost for day care during her hours.
So in a nutshell, instead of paying CS, she only pays half of the daycare expenses and forces the dad to do so as well. Very unfair decision by the judge and I'm surprised she allowed this kind of arrangement.
I crack up when healthcare professionals say they are saving lives everyday, and I'm a RN
I was thinking the same thing.
First off your not saving lives everyday.
Your helping lives everyday big difference.
Also most doctors are legalized drug dealers imo
😂😂😂😂
That's awfully self-deprecating. Maybe you should talk to a therapist. You shouldn't put yourself down. Maybe you don't save lives EVERY day but that doesn't make what healthcare professionals do less important. Don't devalue yourself. You're important and you do an important job.
$1000.00 per month. He sees his kids. How can a man go from 0 to $1000.00 per month. They share in the up bringing. The family is willing to watch the kids. Now its $500.00. Im not sure about this. Before it was zero.
Kids need to be around germs - lots of germs - my friends and I were always digging in dirt, hugging each other, having chickenpox parties and we are all really well. Kids now are kept off school, separated from each other, told not to hug and are all more sickly than we used to be
Mom should be paying for the daycare. So unfair. It is her responsibility to look after them during the day.
LMFAO on the reaction between the ex-wife and the other guy sitting there. EPIC
This judge was totally for the mother and not the children. She wasn't neutral.
If a parent doesn't want their kids to go to daycare, the judge shouldn't force the father to pay 500 a month for something he does not agree to just because the mother wants to. If she wants to send them, she should pay, she isn't taking care of them during their agreed upon time. While he takes them in during the night.
They have split custody, threatening him with child support when there is no fixed custodian for the kids, when they clearly should pay child support to each other, should get you under review Judge Vonda.
This whole matter should've been settled in child custody court where 1 of the 2 would get full custody of the kids and the other decides what they do / where they go and the other pays OR like I said above.. the mother should pay.
In a few years she might want a nanny too and send them to a private school worth 5000$ a month... does the father have to pay half for that as well if he disagrees?
Now that we are living in a pandemic, do you still think they should be in daycare like you forced this man to pay for because CLEARLY you were wrong judge. You forced this man to pay for something he did not want
Force him to pay for something he did not want...🤔
Yes the childcare for her to work
A'Lay Solace As a parent, we are all tasked with doing things “we don’t want to do” but it’s what’s in the best interest of the child(ren) that matters.😊
Support Court with Judge Vonda B. That’s understandable and in the past I have agreed with every other ruling your honor! This was the only case that made me go 🤔 Oh and thank you for responding I feel special lol
A'Lay Solace - It seems that he wasn’t working with the Mother in a resolution, obviously her work situation had changed. He could of arrived at court with a child care resolution. But he didn’t offer any real resolution and was being obstinate.
However it seems that the cost of the day care should be the same for both if the Mother makes triple what he makes. Shouldn’t there have been an offset to determine how much each would pay. Calculate what the child support amount would have been for each parent, then subtracted the difference between the two? I believe based on this the Mother would have been paying the child care bill.
$1,000 a month for daycare. Dammmmm
Better find someone for half that price or get a family member to help
Daniel Garcia I paid 650 for one child
Ms G Really?! How do you pay your rent?!
Daniel Garcia well my son 13 months old my boyfriend pay $1,000 every month 😢 kids expensive
Belly Wank lol 😂 😂😂 you are so right:) well my boyfriend and baby.... sometimes I feel bad 😔 for him ..but my friends told me not to
Well he wanted to get family to watch the children but the judge is forcing him to send them to daycare and pay for it.
Sometimes I watch these older videos and calculate how old these kids are and wonder how they are, especially because of this father I couldn’t imagine him being my father I’m sure he’s a wonderful guy if you get to know him but jeez dude germaphobia is an issue people battle with and get better I just hope he learns that
I mean if you watch the end his behavior is almost alarming, sure maybe they just wanted to do a bit so they told him to do something funny, but if that was true emotion it’s startling. People battling a fear of germs irrationally must really take a tole on one’s life, I imagine it to be near impossible to form deep meaningful connections and build many relationships with people due to being terrified of what they may carry….it was a bit my bad lol
Makes zero sense. Split custody. She should be paying him child support if she makes 3 times as much. If she wants daycare during her time with the kids, she should pay it. But oh, let's screw over the man as usual.
One child is 2 years old and the other one 18 months?...they got busy pretty soon for the 2nd one.jejeje
Okay... And now I'm seeing the ACT. F****** ridiculous
It's funny at the end explaining the dad is using hand sanitizer lol
Buddy with the hand sanitizer is funny
Wait the ex wife saying stop..and the look that other dude gave buddy priceless.
I’m confused how he owes her child support when they have 50/50 and she makes 3 times more than him
Raising kids without Germs will cause their immune system to not work as well, causing them to get sick more.
Also, first episode where you can tell this show was scripted 😥
If she a doctor why can’t she paid it herself? Why could he get full custody and she pays if the father have them overnight? Why she he play half if make 3x as much. Should it 30:70 or a 25:75 for pay?
So the man bass all the over nights and the judge threatens him with child support in Florida she would be paying child support. She makes three times as much and has no overnights that's at least 1200 a month
Has all the overnights.
That daycare price is not bad at all I used to pay it over just over $400 for my daughter’s daycare
My only problem with this is they pick the most expensive and go to court and when child support is raised they go to another cheap one.
That daycare amount sounds reasonable, split is fair. He needs to go to therapy for his "germophobia"
i dont think he needs to pay she the one cant keep them day time so she should pay it
Good acting. That dude played the germophobe perfectly with that hand sanitizer, which doesn't kill c. diff btw.
I agree with the man on this one if he keep them at night with no additional charge to the mother it should be her responsibility to take care of them during daytime I would ask for her to pay night daycare
Did anybody catch when the judge questioned the age of the children she said "2 years and 18 months" that's only 6 months apart. How can that be?
Women give birth early. Couples adopt children. Couples have surrogates. Those are possibilities.
Support Court with Judge Vonda B. Thank you
Also it could be like 2 1/2 years they didn’t specify -
This is massively unfair, and this usually fair judge is absolutely unbearable here. They have a 50/50 agreement; she is no longer willing to do her part herself, and he has to pay 50% for something that exclusively benefits her. And this judge is even threatening him to pay child support in a 50/50 agreement situation. Pure injustice.
Yup. I agree with these comments too. I agree with the dad. He shouldn’t have to pay the day care when she’s the one who wants to put them in it. Like he said he would pay full if it was his time he had to watch the kids. It should be her full responsibility of paying the daycare since it’s her time to watch the kids.
The guys is a pathetic loser PERIOD!
But she works, she’s a doctor
She's a doctor and just said her job no longer allows her to stay with them during the day. He should help pay part of the expenses. He didn't check out the daycare because he didn't want to. His phobia isn't her problem. He wants his way and is being stubborn about it because he's not getting his way. Ridiculous.
Maybe there isn't a family member who wants to or is able to care for them all day.
Lol that’s ridiculous the children belongs to both of them they both need to pay for daycare, if they was going to private school it’ll still fall on her time, so should she pay for that too?
Only fair the man needs to do daycare on his time and let the mother pay half as well . Feminist need TRUE EQUALITY
Nanny...
What a unfair ruling on a split custody at which point now does the mum have them
I love Christine! Keep it creepy ♥️ if you know, you know
this is so sad would hate to have this judge as my judge ,this women would rather put her kids in child care and waste $1000 instead of staying with a family member smh
So she shares the expenses of her original responsibilities with him, but he doesn't share the expenses of his original responsibilities with her?
Fuck that, that's bull shit. BuT tHaT wAr On WaHmEn!!
Her ruling was off in this case. The cost enquired was during here turn to care of the kids
The judge TOTALLY 'missed' the point AIRHEAD style here....
1) 24 & 18 month old 🚼 do NOT 'need' to go to school, because soooo much is beyond the capacity of a parent to TEACH a 2y.o. 😵
2) He is ABSOLUTELY correct.... Because their split agreement was based upon one party doing DAYS and the other doing NIGHTS....if said party CHOOSES to 'do something', go somewhere, where that party can't or doesn't want to take the kids...it SHOULD be, that party's bill.
* The caveat, that the judge MISSED is that 'normally'
1) ppl work during the day
2) kids either HAVE TO be in daycare because a) #1 Daytime work or b) Kids are of proper school AGE...but the BIG miss was
3) This party who had AGREED to work NIGHTS vs DAYS...totally UNILATERALLY 'chose' to switch where
1) It couldn't have been that long that she pulled this CRAP because the kids are 1 & 2 ( it's not like she's been doing it for YEARS and needs a break from nights, she didn't even sacrifice ONE freaking year FOR her babies) another thing that's sh*tty specifically for THIS parent is that she is a DOCTOR at a hospital, so nights vs days is MUCH more of a personal cgoixe for her, it'd be different if she were an engineer or CPA where the shift is daytime or ZERO work...she absolutely could work nights only AND still have been a PARENT w/ no real deterrent to her ability to earn ( especially until the kids are more age appropriate for Pre-School if not Kindergarten....it's only a few years but 1 & 2?)
Either way IF whichever parent had custodial care of them and wanted to 'go out' or warehouse the kids on their watch that SHOULD equal their nickel NOT 50%
Just like the Dad said...if this is the case, then if HE feels NIGHTCARE is appropriate I suppose she'll pay 50% of that?
This again isn't a case where there is NO CHOICE but to warehouse the kids because both HAVE TO WORK DAYS...
She PURPOSELY does not WANT to be a Doctor on night shift, when she ABSOLUTELY could and has been....she didn't say 'Hey the hospital said I'm FIRED if I don't do Days'....no she wants days likely to be involved with the politics of moving UP the corporate ladder quicker, which YES she's right, working days would serve that purpose better....it's a matter of CHOICES.
Either she WANTS to be there during the kids developmental stages as a PARENT ( where most/many don't get to choose) or she just absolutely PREFERS to not be bothered with 'that'
But to make the agreement...one party CONTINUES
1) Working during the DAY and then
2) Caring for the kids at NIGHT &
3) Now PAYING for HALF of the care during the DAY, during the time the other party had agreed was THEIR responsiblity?????
At that point isn't it just HIM being basically the FULL TIME parent and since she DOES NOT have the kids DAY or NIGHT....wouldn't it make sense for her to just pay CHILD SUPPORT at this point
He's feeding them dinner and obviously their sleeping, waking up, getting dressed,having breakfast and going TO DAYCARE from his house (on his way to WORK) and then RETURNING to his home after WORK/DAYCARE...
that means she has NO CUSTODY, all she did was choose the DAYCARE where HE takes them and picks them up from....that ALL she has to do is pay 50% of daycare and have ZERO physical responsibilities AT ALL.....
Why wouldn't she just pay CHILD SUPPORT at this point....she's not covering ANY meals, doing ZERO baths, zero bedtimes, zero mornings ready for school....
How is it 50/50 if the kids are in daycare when he's working AND with him when his off....if that's the case they should SPLIT night time custody since she has changed HER availability....
So if he wanted to go on a date, would she responsible for paying half?
He should just declare for custody and then CHOOSE how he wants to handle it, with a family member etc since he is responsible either way....because again if they sleep at his house every night, he'd be the one transporting them back n forth from WHEREVER they go, so why not just be the whole BOSS vs allowing HER to manipulate the situation, make him drive back n forth to a daycare he doesn't want AND pay 50% of it
= Hell nah
Long post...find something to do.😂
@@JudgeVondaB Wow what a distasteful way to respond to a long post. Saying the person should find something to do other then watch and comment on your videos.(i know this was posted two years ago, but still)