GTX 1630 vs RX 6400 - Test in 8 Games
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 лип 2022
- Games : @1080p
Far Cry 6 0:01
Cyberpunk 2077 0:51
Resident Evil Village 1:52
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3:01
Horizon Zero Dawn 4:02
Hitman 3 5:03
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6:09
Watch Dogs Legion 7:14
PC Specs:
Palit GeForce GTX 1630 4GB Dual GDDR6
Gigabyte Radeon RX 6400 EAGLE 4G GDDR6
intel Core i9-12900K
Asus ROG Maximus Z690 Hero
RAM: 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5 5200 MHz
Samsung 970 EVO Plus SSD 1TB
CPU Cooler: Corsair iCue H150i RGB PRO
Corsair RM850x White 80PLUS Gold 850W - Ігри
AMD tried so hard to make the worst GPU. but nvidia managed to dethrone them with how garbage the 1630 is
Rx 6400 is not even close to being bad, let alone worse, it is meant and targeted for a specific audience which believe it to be the best low profile gpu so far.
@@softwarearena7592 yeah. it serves a purpose. but 1630? that thing is dogshit
@@zhila5958 Yea that's just load of bull, nvidia is at this point just putting ancient chips on new cases and setting them for double the price, its just a shit show honestly
@@softwarearena7592 1630 would’ve been fine at 70$. but 150$? LMFAO. the 6400 with a PCIE 4.0 mobo can literally shit on it. and guess what? the 6500xt at 180$ can absolutely smoke that thing. for only 30$ more
@@zhila5958 haha pretty true, and they had the nerf and audacity to release such shitty card with a ridiculous price, that just prooves that they don't give a shit about anyone, just wants to cash big and shit on everything.
Imagine trying so hard to make the worst GPU of the year/decade and Nvidia comes around the corner and takes it away......poor AMD
I mean at least AMD had the audacity to make the 6400 to run some games at over 60fps...Nvidia however did not
RX 6400 is surprisingly good and its the cheapest between new budget gpus.
You made the fastest GPU, but Nvidia makes 3090 ti. You made the worst GPU, but... Nvidia makes 1630. Nvidia is a winner
xd
nope RX 6950 XT is better than 3090ti, which is no different than 3090.
The GTX 1630 is slower, more expensive, more power hungry and based on an older process than the RX 6400. On top of that the RX 6400 has hardware RT acceleration. Why should anyone buy the 1630?
@The hero we deserve no one uses 3 displays, atleast not on a entry level card that's more less meant for work. that's why the 1630 didn't even get announced by Nvidia, it wasn't meant for gamers, but gamers are the ones who get curious only cause it's a graphics card, and people forget not every card is meant for gaming. these are low profile cards meant for casual games, not for hardcore gaming. the thing is you can't buy them, you have to go to each manufacturer that makes there own version of the card and buy it directly.
i bought an MSI low profile version 1630 through MSI, but i didn't buy it for gaming because it's not good enough to run most modern games, i got it for the living room as a home theatre movie set up. i replaced the GT 950 which is what in it previously. i have the RX 6600 XT for my main rig, that was a replacement for the gtx 1050.
The GTX 1630 is just 100-120 dollars now and the rx 6400 is still 160 dollars at least in my country. @@Jeymez
Nvidia has already had best GPU crown, but they didn't just sit idle they also got the crown for worst GPU this generation.
oh no its 2017 again, gtx 1050 ti vs rx 570
Amd: i made the worst budget gpu of this generation
Nvidia: you sure? Sit and watch...
Hold my beer
АМД тащи!)
power consumption?
I had no idea the 1630 existed
Wich is better for editing, rendering, content creation? 🙏🏻🤓💻
1630 because the rx 6400 doesn't have hardware encoding. But the rx 6400 is much better for literally anything else
@MicahDaRhuler can I do editing with rx 6600?
What about with ddr4 memory?
Rx 6400 top!
I don’t understand why they didn’t just push the 1650 low profile back onto the market.
i wish they made low profile 6500
kinda sad that 1630 can't even beat a wheelchair bound 6400...
bench rx 6400 vs gtx 1630 pci 3.0 plz i3 10100f CPU
yep, that'll be interesting to see as most ppl will have 3.0 system.
Lmao. The 6400 is not only faster than the 1630 at launch (even on PCIe 3), but it's likely to age far better as well. This is embarrassing for Nvidia. The 6400 is literally made out of repurposed laptop GPUs lol. I hoped AMD would release a purpose built budget card, but given the sorry state of the 1630 and Intel's Arc A380, the 6400 should clean house on the low end this generation.
Moi j'espère qu'ils font sortir une 7400 capable d'enfoncer une 3060 histoire que Nvidia se bouge les fesses pour les gamers au budget limité
...and what about pcie3?...
AMD absolutely dominates here
Rx 6400 and 6500 xt makes sense in
Markets which they are the cheapest gpus. Like in brazil for example.
Or like France cause People are more poor than before, just a little bit like 5-10% can buy rtx.
Ha újonnan kell akkor szerintem az Amd rx 6400 4g de azért az Intel arc A380 sincs nagyon lemaradva. Ha használt piac akkor éppen ami van.
Nvidia low cost is very death in this moment
RX 6400 BEST LOW ENTRY AND LOW PROFILE EVER IN 2022
gtx 1630 30 fps wel 30$ max !!! for apu gpu or sarter card for starting up your pc for instaling win 10 ! veri bad !
veri good video . next one vs to intel ark a370m with tha gtx 1630 ..tha ultimate low low end !!
test warzone plss
Tá Melhor pegar um 5600g doque essa 1630...
the 6400 is even worse than the 6500 xt, damn i think the 6500 xt would completely destroy the 1630
Yes it is i have a Rx 6500 XT at pcie 4.0 with rDNA 2.0 and it's performing better than GTX 1660 super 💀 amd is actually good at making budget cards
@@Nats3ki bro can you record with windows gamebar with the 6500XT? which cpu are you using?
@@narami8702 bro I'm sorry but i disabled game bar because it literally kills ur fps and only records 30 fps obs is better you can record 1080p 60fps but i can tell you the average fps that i get in popular games like valorant and etc.
The new gtx 1630 suck, more like gt 1030.
Jajaja 💩💩💩💩💩
RTX 2050 BENCHMARK
AyyMD became GayMD
NVidiot became WinVidia
Guess it's 2012 again for AMD