A History of Dispensationalism
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 вер 2020
- Rev. Michael J. Glodo, Associate Professor of Pastoral Theology and Dean of the Chapel at Reformed Theological Seminary in Orlando, Florida, speaks about dispensationalism and its development in light of several historical, sociological, and theological contexts. Rev. Glodo is the author of “Dispensationalism” in Covenant Theology: Biblical, Theological, and Historical Perspectives edited by Guy Prentiss Waters, J. Nicholas Reid, and John R. Muether.
John Nelson Darby (1800-1882) introduced dispensationalism as a theological system, which bears several key characteristics, including an insistence upon a “literal” hermeneutic or “plain reading” of the biblical text in addition to separate divine purposes for Israel and the church. Yet several features of “classic dispensationalism” have since been modified or altogether eliminated. Glodo remarks that “from its beginnings until the middle of the twentieth century, dispensationalism grew rapidly in popularity and underwent several refinements.”
This is Christ the Center episode 666 (www.reformedforum.org/ctc666)
![The Errors of Dispensationalism [Scriptum #4.3]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0K1D5bvI3Wc/mqdefault.jpg)
At 75 I was recently introduced to Preterism. Had never realized I was an ignorant Dispensationalists…. Not any longer….
It is an error to say non-dispensationalists believe in "replacement theology". Reformed people believe in EXPANSION theology, not "replacement theology": the Israel of God (Galatians 6:16) where Gentiles were added to the Jewish people saved by grace through faith (Gen. 15) to expand the Israel of God. The true Israel of God is Christ Himself--if you are in Him or part of His body, you are a true Israelite. There are not 2 separate plans of salvation; 1 for the ethnic Jew and 1 for the Gentile. The Son of God stated the flesh profits nothing. Classical Dispensationalism says if you are an ethnic Jew in the end times, the flesh profits a great deal. The ONLY way to be reconciled to God is through the crucified Christ. No other way. No separate plan of salvation as certain famous dispensational teachers have claimed. One very famous dispensationalist stated in a book, "The Jews don't need to be evangelized, they are already in covenant with God...". That is pure heresy.
I was in fellowship with the Plymouth Brethren for many years. Dispensationalists believe that Reformed people are anti-Semitic. One thing I could not get over was that Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud, Leon Trotsky, Henry Morgentaler, and Bugsy Siegel were Jewish. There was no way I was going to believe that they were right with God because they were Jewish.
I agree. When I was president of the funding branch for a rehab center in Israel for Russian Jews, I would have to hear replacement theology accusations, which I would confront the speaker about during breaks. Then I heard about big name Zionists saying faith in Christ was just for Gentiles, while the Jews had their own approach, while dispensationalists put off the necessity of Jews to be evangelized until some later date.
Amen….
John Hagee.
i'm adopted into Gods kingdom
I attended Dispensational churches for most of my life before switching to a Reformed church recently. I've learned more about Dispensationalism in the last few months than I did all those years. Dispensationalists may say that God is the same all the time, and that God saves by grace through faith in both the Old and New Testaments, and today, but when they preach, it doesn't come across that way. I came to Reformed Theology because it cleared up the discontinuity implied by Dispensational preachers I listened to for years and years. Reformed Theology is more in line with my understandings of Scripture than Dispensationalism.
As far as eschatology, all I know is that Jesus is coming back some day. In the meantime, we are to make disciples, and baptize in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
One simple way to find out if your church pastors are of the Dispensational camp of theology is to ask them is Matt 24 eschatology written to the Jews and tribulation saints and not the church of born again believers? If they say yes or for the most part, then they are eschatological dispensationalist. That I believe can be dangerous because they believe in the any moment doctrine of Christ return and no prophetic signs that proceed it. It can be even more dangerous if they don't do Bible prophecy updates as related to current events which means their church can be totally caught off guard by the evil plans of Satan's one world system advancing across the earth in the form of the fulfillment of (Daniel 9:26-27 and it's different interpretations) and the seals of Rev 6. If all their eschatological eggs are in the Dispensational camp and it's the wrong theology as I believe, then that is very dangerous and misleading to their congratulations!!! This happened at my church because the current pandemic of the last 2.5 years has caused fear, confusion and deception to cause many pastors, church staff and members to accept the vaccines which the Bible calls a (sorcery) in Rev 18:23-24 which means pharmacies, drugs and poison. Who would have guessed this would be the first seal of Rev 6? Brothers and sisters in Christ get out your concordances and review with a open mind what the word (bow) and (crown) mean in the Greek dictionary in Rev 18:23 and stop relying on commentaries from Dispensational theology. Yes, if we are in the first seal already and I think we sure could be then Daniel 9:26-27 the string firm covenant with the many has already been fulfilled back in May of 2021 by the prince of the people that destroyed the temple and the city (in 70 AD) AKA pope Francis by giving His full support to the (United Nations= the many) of the great reset agenda 30 climate change deception. It was the U.N's agreement that Pope Francis made stronger and firm. Research pope Francis book entitled (Laudato Si) on climate change. Also another critical book to read is entitled (The Real Anthony Fauci) by Robert F Kennedy Jr. It will fully expose the evil behind the gain of function research of the virus and development of the vaccines that Bill Gates, Fauci, the WHO and the vaccine companies and the great reset of the World Economic Forum for massive population reduction by vaccines, food shortages, hyperinflation and wars increasing across the globe. In my humble opinion all the peaces fit this current event prophetically well. Study and consider this yourselves??? ✝ ✝ ✝
Soooooo close. Name(singular). Read Acts. ✝️☝️
Sorry to hear the church you were in weren’t really dispensationalist
You probably haven't read through the whole Bible, and meditate about the serious questions that a true believer need to answer with honesty.
@@paulgarduno2867 how many times has john haggee read the bible and still doesn’t have a clue.
An outstanding discussion! I learned a lot. A couple influential names missing from the discussion were Clarence Larkin (1880-1924), whose 1918 book Dispensational Truth brought us the end-times charts still used today, and tractmaster Jack Chick, who spread premill dispensationalism through millions of comic book tracts (The Beast and The Last Generation were hugely influential in my becoming a dispie).
Chick tracks! Used to love reading those as a kid. My family put them with candy at Halloween. I wonder how many were scared into the kingdom.
@@leadinged As long as they're in the kingdom! I still love Chick tracts and like your family I always include a handful in with the Halloween candy. Thanks for the comment!
@@leadingedtracts
The books by Larkin and Chafer caused me to question dispensational theology. Then I asked graduates of BIOLA and everyone of them told me they never understood what they were taught. I cannot imagine the early Christians listening to scripture being read that they could ever come up with dispensationalism. When I think about what Chafer wrote mentioning three classes of people: Jews, Christians and Jews. When I read Philippians 3 I see where Paul mentions they are the true circumcision. I am unable to find three people in that statement.
Yea I noticed the episode number I thought it was a tongue-in-cheek joke . Looking forward to the discussion
Blessings
Thank you Reformed forum and guest for the reasonable discussion and balanced treatment of the history of dispensationalism. I am some kind of dispensationalist and I was expecting this to be the usual hatchet job but you did very well. We need more content like this on these crtique videos of other theological systems.
Schofieldism and Darbyism deceived millions with the doctrine of the rapture😮
Ummm the rapture is clearly a biblical doctrine. Enoch and Elijah were both raptured. Jesus and Paul both spoke about and taught it. Harpadso is the Greek word Paul used for believers still alive being “caught up,” and is where the term comes from.
@@beauchal
In-Doctrine-nation.....
Such a pleasant and fascinating discussion. Well done.
Does anyone remember the old Left Behind movie, probably made in the 70s. It had that song playing in it. The movie scared the heck out of me. "There's no time to change your mind, the Son has come and you've been left behind." Probably the scariest movie I've ever watched.
The movie was A Thief in the Night, 1972. I CANNOT overstate how destructive it was on someone my age, born 1970. It was not a shinning moment for Christianity , IMHO. God be praised, I was awakened to post-mil two years ago. LOL sounds like I ought to get a sobriety chip...
Yes. My parents had me and my siblings watch it when we were kids. I had to be around 7. It terrified me for years.
Oh my gosh this gave myself and all my siblings nightmares I hate it.
😂 666. That smirk was priceless.
Wow. That smirk at the announcing of the episode number for the topic! Well played
😂
yes, they love there dispensationalist brothers and sisters don't they?
Warning dispensationlist ua-cam.com/video/-d4p2JYWyd0/v-deo.html
Yes, I caught that too.
READ THE BIBLE AND KEEP IT IN YOUR HEART JESUS IS LORD
So, for quite some time I have made myself a student of all things relating to eschatology. Growing up SB in Texas, I learned about the rapture, 7 year trib., and everything that follows after. I was really challenged by the class I sat in on with Dr. Morey. I read his book through and it created a lot of confusion for me, so I tabled the concept for short time. Later, I picked it back up as I started off on my biased quest to prove what I believed, or was taught growing up to be true. As biased as I was, I proved myself wrong. I would read articles, and go to scripture over and over again. I would watch youtube videos and again go back to scripture. The more I tried to make an argument for a rapture, the more questions I created. The more I considered the fact that Revelation was apocalyptic language, more questions were answered. My first "aha" moment I was blessed with was the fact that dispensationalist have to make apocalyptic language literal and take literal terms such as "this generation" and make it apocalyptic. After that, I used scripture outside of Revelation to interpret Revelation, Daniel 9 for example. 70 weeks were decreed, and by all accounts, the timeline marched out just as was prophesized. BTW, this is the part where I start getting really geeky... However, one John Nelson Darby took it upon himself to put a pin into the 69th week and created a prophetic pause button and inserted 2000 years, known as the "gap theory". We will come back to that part later but something else about Daniel stuck in my craw as well. Why was Daniel told to seal up what was revealed to him, yet John was told not too, while on the island of Patmos, because the time was NEAR? Staying with John now, and this part is not my own observation, but what is striking is that if Revelation was written in 95 AD, which is required for dispensationalism to hold water, why did John never mention the destruction of the temple in 70AD? Nary a word. A big goose egg. That would be a kin to writing about WWII and leaving out the holocaust. From that observation though, I now believe it is because he wrote Revelation before 70AD, which would lend itself to him being told "not to seal it up" and '"the time was near." Likewise, this frames the Olivet Discourse as was intended by Jesus. After the disciples asked Him when these things would come to pass, he gives His answer in Matt. 24:14: "And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then the end shall come" (KJV). So the next logical question would be is when was the gospel preached to all nations? Paul told us in Col. 1: 23: "If ye continue in the faith grounded and settled, and be not moved away from the hope, of the gospel, which ye have heard, and which was preached to every creature which is under heaven; whereof I Paul am made a minister." Another thing I discovered is that dispensationalists really have trouble squaring with is Hebrews especially the 9:26: "For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end he hath appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself." This points directly back to the Olivet Discourse and defining exactly what generation Christ was talking about - the one he was speaking to and not 2000 years later. But let us pause and welcome Mr. Darby back, because if I knew nothing about a pre-tribulation rapture and picked up a bible and read Matthew, I would conclude that the tribulation took place in the generation Jesus was speaking to. Point is, this is a made made scheme that has to be taught and learned. So I did some more digging because I wanted to know what exactly Darby said regarding this. I eventually found his synopsis of Matthew 24, and WOW.... He was either grossly deceived by something or some one, or hitting the crack pipe. He observed that: "The disciples confounded that which the Lord had said of the destruction of the temple with this period." "God hides His face from them until He shall see what their end will be, for they are a very froward generation, children in whom is no faith." So in Darby's words, God wasn't sure how everything was going to play out because they are stubborn and pigheaded. So Darby decided that God was going to cut them a break by declaring: "The time of this ignorance God winked at, and another ground of judgment as to them is given in the beginning of Romans."
"if Revelation was written in 95 AD, which is required for dispensationalism to hold water, why did John never mention the destruction of the temple in 70AD? "
Excellent point.
John, a contemporary of Jesus, would have been about 95 years old in 95AD. A bit too old to sit in a dank cave and write Revelation , in my opinion.
There are much easier and logical paths to dismissing the error of dispensationalism and a pre trib rapture than preterism.
@@jamesenewold8864 I’m not a preterist. God is returning at the end of this age.
So many unanswered questions,!
Most of them generated by the biased and wrong, "replacement theology" . This is what you get when you ignore God's faithfulness to Abraham, Issac and Jacob. Aka. The Nation of Israel .
@@BertGraef Moses was writing when he was almost 120 yrs old
Thanks for the discussion. An accurate understanding of the scriptures.
Thanks for the episode! Also, what is the thumbnail artwork?
Thank you. I'm not reformed but I enjoyed your discussion, both on and off topic.
One thing I would have liked is that you would go further back than Darby and Scofield. Lots of (or all?) dispensationalists actually disagree that dispensationalism 'began' in in the late 1800's and they would rather trace dispensationalism back to certain individuals who wrote and taught already in the centuries following Christs crucifixion.
I think it is always the most honourable thing to take your opponents claims seriously and examine them to the fullest extend, because if you just begin at Darby and Scofield, you will lose many a dispensationalist listener because you will already have proven yourself to not take their own claims seriously.
Thanks again.
It started with the jesuits, they wanted papacy to get away with millions of crimes they committed.
who are the ones before Darby?
You didn’t include a link to the content you referenced at 21:00 - could you? Can’t find it on UA-cam or podcast.
This guy makes me feel like Phillip Seymour Hoffman is giving me a Bible talk. (All in good fun, thanks for the informative discussion)
There are still PCUSA churches in Mercer and Hunterdon County New Jersey who have dispensationalist leanings from Lambertville, NJ and Delaware Water Gap. What he is saying is still true in Rural America in the North East. I am glad he said this. True about 10 th Presbyterian and the elders who to this day have some old ties with previously pre-millenial Bible Departments @ Cairn University (Phila
College of the Bible).
What piano bar jazz music artist was playing at the beginning?
I would have loved for these men to bring up the impact of Grace Theological Seminary and Alva J. McClain.
Nobody comes to the father but through Christ. Do Jews accept Christ as savior? No. Is God a respecter of persons. No. Pretty simple. The Jews will not be saved just because of their DNA
the Jews we know are not of the seed of Abraham they are fake ..Khazars
Jews, just like those of every other ethnic group, will be saved by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone.
Eleven seconds into the episode, and I'm already laughing!
I guess what I mean as futurism… which was influential in concepts of rapture. Please read below
“futurism as devised by a Jesuit, Francisco Ribera, during the Counter-Reformation. In the early 19th century, Manuel de Lacunza, also thought to have been a Jesuit, expanded on it”.
Glad to hear about this. When I first became converted I was exposed to dispensationalism. Now I longer hold those views. Fascinating how this view gained ground in America and still is popular
I would guess that the majority of people in reformed churches that hold to covenant theology were influenced by or even held to dispensational beliefs at some point. Dispensationalism runs deep in American evangelicalism.
Nicholas... as one who was taught it and steeped in it can you pls explain it in short layman's paragraphs and why is dispensation interwoven into pre trib rapture.
Thank you
Same here! So glad the Lord showed me the truth about this false system!
@@Christian-vq8rd a little leaven goes a long way. The assumption that they are even biblical Israel today is absurd.
Those who deny the SON, dont have The Father. 1 John 2:22-23. The whole argument is a moot point. Reformed theology shouldnt even be discussing this pathetic nonsense. That religion still claiming Moses but worshipping thier talmudic sages and blaspheming Jesus by calling Him an "idol" is as valid as Islam or Buddhism in Gods eyes. But satan is crafty....
Same here , I came to faith in a Calvary Chapel which holds dispensationalism as an essential doctrine . I’m blessed to be a member of my local OPC
37:10 through 41:05 and 46:59 through 47:56 is absolute gold.
Replacement Theology is a disingneuous pejorative term made up by insincere dispensationists
who cannot debate their own position and resort to name calling. The Church Israel distinction comes
dangerously close to preaching a different Gospel gal. 1:6-9
@@rstora01This is because your theology isn't based on Scripture. How can "all Israel" be the church in Romans 11:26? Paul used Israel as national ethnic Israel 9 verses in a row starting in Romans 9:27. What contextual clue do you offer that Paul has switched to use Israel as the church in Romans 11:26? Paul says there was a "partial hardening" of Israel in Romans 11:25. Are you claiming this "partial hardening" was of the church? If not, what evidence do you have that Paul is suddenly referring to the church one verse later (11:26)? Absolute proof that "all Israel" is national ethnic Israel is found 2 verses later when Paul states they are "enemies of the gospel for your sake (11:28)? If you claim "all Israel" in Romans 11:26 is the church, how can they be "enemies of the gospel" 2 verses later? How can believers in the gospel be enemies of the gospel? Obviously, those who were enemies of the gospel were those of national ethnic Israel.
Clearly Paul is referring to a national restoration of Israel at Christ's Parousia as evidenced by his citation of Isaiah 59:20. This is the same belief the apostles had in Acts 1:6; 3:19-21. The apostles believed and taught a future restoration of Israel, why don't you? Those who receive the doctrines of the apostles receive the very doctrines of Christ (Matt. 10:40). Are you then not proclaiming a different gospel?
The old testament promises "land" because it is necessary to form a kingdom. In the new testament, Jesus declares the "Kingdom of God" is at hand. I don't understand how he can says there is no "land" motif in the New Testament.
Very disappointed in the lack of social/political implications brought upon US and other nations that openly embraced this severe doctrinal error called dispensationalism.
Because you don’t understand it
Endtimes delusion by steve wohlberg
The 70 weeks of Daniel and the jesuit lie of futurism by uncontrolled oppersition
Romanism and the reformation from the standpoint of prophecy by H.GRATTON.GUINNESS
Vatican secret society's jesuits and the new world order by KJVIDEOMINSTRIES
Juggler66
Darkness is falling youtube and newtube
Rulers of evil by tupper saussy
I haven’t understood this argument, does that mean prior to dispensationalism all the social/political issues were due to covenant theology? If not, why is dispensationalism at fault now? There were no other major factors at work? It looks like convenient blame shifting.
@@coloradodutch7480 There will always be social and political issues as Jesus said "there will always be poor" due to the sinful nature of man. It just a matter of which one will corrupt a person or church, or society faster.
Have you looked into the history of Dispensationalism and how it evolved since it was conceived by John Nelson Darby? The fact that it changed so much should be a warning.
Dispensationalism is not new. It's just a mix of ancient heresies Marcionism, Montanism, Ebionism, etc. When it was first proposed, many orthodox pastors and theologians called it a heresy. It changed quite a bit to be questionable now.
Very good 👍
What’s the book called
Most Excellent gentlemen!
Fortunately "Dispensationalism" is waning... not fast enough... but the dispensational biblical system of hermeneutics really is being dismissed these days. I graduated from Bethel Seminary (M.Div, 2014), and several of my theology professors were Dallas grads; to the man, and woman, they have all dismissed the system entirely. There is hope.
I was heavily influenced by D and was teethed on the Scofield Ref Bible ( 1 and 2); as I progressed through Bible College, then Seminary, I too found D to be untenable biblically, theologically, and historically... the Bible can never mean what it never meant !
Thanks again for the talk... even learned a couple things!
marcus
Funny, I went the other way.
As I progressed through the Bible I found covenant theology to be untenable biblically, theologically, and historically... the Bible can never mean what it never meant !
@@coloradodutch7480, ridiculous.
Augustinian Calvinism has been a biblical thing since, well, Augustin!
It's what the Bible has always meant. Dispensationalism is the new kid on the block; heterodoxy, balderdash & poppycock.
marcus
@@markh.harris9271and before Augustine the early church fathers were pre millennial. Believing in a literal thousand year reign of Christ was orthodox Christianity for the first few hundred years. End of the day it’s about the Bible not what church history taught.
@ZandJ12345 , I don't have so much problem with historical premillenialism; and I certainly can't fault the church fathers that early on at being mistaken.
The worse sin is "wrongly" dividing the word of truth. My main problem with D is the hermeneutics, which destroys the meaning of the new covenant New Testament, denies most of Jesus' words in the synoptic gospels, and flatly denies ultimately the person and work of Christ.
John Nelson Darby's idea are not just the mother-load of bad theological principles, his thoughts and teachings encoded in the C. I. Scofield reference Bible are straightup heterodoxy.
marcus
Scofield was a drunk with the wrong spirit guiding him.....read 4 Ezra
Leap Castle (apparently the world's most haunted) was owned and lived in by the Darby's
As soon as you said "it was like a new religion". I chuckled a bit and thought, he is going to walk that back a bit.
Would it be correct in thinking that the dispensational thought of the literal Israel having to be supported like the Jews of the NT believing the Messiah was going to literally free Israel from Rome and they'd have their kingdom back?
Paul said in Romans 11:25-26 that Israel is mostly hardened until the fullness of the Gentiles comes in, and in this way all Israel shall be saved. That shows a clear distinction that God makes between Israel and the mostly Gentile church.
It shows that the church is made up of both Jews and Gentiles and at the time of Paul it was switching more and more from being primarily Jewish to being more and more Gentile. It looks like Paul is convinced that it will swing back to being heavily Jewish before Christ returns.
No, two branches of the ONE true vine, one broken off and the other grafted in. Keep in mind that the Church was predominantly comprised of Jews for the first few decades of its history-not only Gentiles.
Dispensational Claim: Romans 11 proves National Israel will be saved in the future.
I have heard both John MacArthur, and John Hagee make the following statement…
“And then all Israel will be saved.” (Also found on page 349 of the book “Coming of Messiah in Glory and Majesty” by the Jesuit, Manuel Lacunza “Ben Ezra”.)
Both MacArthur, and Hagee, are selectively quoting from the verse below in an attempt to make Dispensational Theology work. Have they changed the meaning of the verse?
Rom 11:26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:
Rom 11:27 For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.
These men have changed the word “so”, which is an adverb of manner, into the word “then”, which is an adverb of timing.
What is the “manner” of salvation in the passage? It is in the preceding verses found below.
Rom 11:23 And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be graffed in: for God is able to graff them in again.
Rom 11:24 For if thou wert cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and wert graffed contrary to nature into a good olive tree: how much more shall these, which be the natural branches, be graffed into their own olive tree?
In Romans chapter 11 the Apostle Paul uses the Olive Tree as a symbol of the New Covenant Church, made up of believing Israelites, and believing Gentiles, grafted together into the same tree. In the two verses above the unbelievers can be grafted back into the tree through faith in Christ. Paul provides no path to salvation outside of the New Covenant Church in the passage.
Is the “covenant” in verse 27 a future covenant with the modern State of Israel, or is it the New Covenant fulfilled for all races of people by the blood of Christ at Calvary? In order to answer this question we need to know who is “Israel”, as defined by Paul, earlier in the same letter to the Romans. What did Paul say below about “Israel” in Romans chapter 9?
Rom 9:6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: (All Israelites are not a part of faithful Israel.)
Rom 9:7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.
Rom 9:8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.
(Being a physical Israelite does not make a person a part of Israel of the promise.)
Rom 9:27 Esaias also crieth concerning Israel, Though the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea, a remnant shall be saved:
(Only a “remnant” of Israelites shall be saved.)
Based on the verses above from Romans 9 Paul was describing the “manner” of how Israelites would be saved in Romans 11:26, instead of the timing of their salvation.
The verse below is also often used by Dispensationalists in an attempt to make their doctrine work. Dispensationalists often insist an Israelite can be an enemy of God, and the elect at the same time.
Rom 11:28 As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes.
Throughout Romans chapter 11 the Apostle Paul refers to two different groups of Israelites, one faithful, and one not faithful. Paul begins the chapter this way is Romans 11:1-5, by describing the Israelites who were Baal worshippers, in contrast to the faithful “remnant”, during the time of Elijah. Paul said there was also a faithful “remnant” during his time. Therefore, based on Romans 11:1-5, there are two different groups of Israelites in Romans 11:28. The Israelites who rejected Christ were the “they” who are the enemies of God, while the group of “they” who accepted Christ are the “election”. Paul ends the passage in the same way that he began the passage, with two different groups of Israelites.
@@SpotterVideo Any Christian who has studied thier Talmud knows that they arent even the biblical people or nation anyway. The entire discussion is a moot point. Still using Paul's arguments 2000 years after the nation and temple and priesthood was destroyed is pointless. They are just about as valid a religion in Gods eye as Islam or buddhism or Hinduism.
assuming that the talmudist/rabbincic, Leviteless cult that calls Jesus an "idol" and is still the biblical nation or even Pauls people, is false. Dont even give the devil an inch, please. Rev 2:9.
This was excellent!
1:13:00 Good discussion here. Dispens can tend to be excessively focused on giving current day Israel carte blanche. We shouldn't be opposed to them, but we need to not view US or Israel as nations of God.
We SHOULDN’T be opposed? The Word tells us differently:
EXPOSE EVIL:
Ephesians 5:11
“And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.” King James Version (KJV)
that religion which denies His SON, is under WRATH. This isnt even a NT teaching. Psalm 2:12.
@@hummerwisdom amen......most sheep have no clue what they are even blessing and bidding godspeed to. 2 John 7-11.
Warning dispensationlist ua-cam.com/video/-d4p2JYWyd0/v-deo.html
Anybody who doesn’t understand Pauls dispensation Eph 3:1-10kjb might understand darbys mess from 200 yrs ago but not what the Lord gave Paul 2000 years ago. Look at the Acts 2 church which says was added to in Acts2. The Acts 2 church was already in tact then comes Paul and the Lord had him write this 1 Tim 1:15This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of whom I am chief. 16Howbeit for this cause I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might shew forth all longsuffering, for a pattern to them which should hereafter believe on him to life everlasting. Paul is the first member of the body of Christ and a pattern to him that believes hereafter. Go ahead and have your nonsense discussion i choose to follow my kjv not what satan and his man darby started.
The thing I think about, is how many brides does Christ have? It's one vine we've been grafted in we received the same nourishment He's not going to have a bride and then the ugly could of would or should have. It's one body Israel seed of Abraham.
What is amazing is some believe there will be an end of the church age. Well, it had a beginning, but it will not have an end. What ends is the Gentiles coming into the church. But the Bride is forever!
Mike, every age(aion) has an end; 1 Cor.10:11.
@@aioniansage6081 Yes there is an end of this age, as Jesus said in Matt. 24. But there is not end to the church. She goes on forever. Amen?
@@Mike65809 Yes, the Church which is Christ's body will of course continue.
Warning dispensationlist ua-cam.com/video/-d4p2JYWyd0/v-deo.html
Not really amazing just bible belief
In Hebrews 1:1 the writer shows a bit 9f dispensationalism which I quite agree with.
Is Michael's chapter available separately?
Holy and reverend is His name! Psalm 111:9
I have been attending Precept Ministries Bible studies and realized, after studying Hebrews, Daniel, & now Revelation with them, that they adhere to dispensationalism. The studies are otherwise excellent. Can anyone recommend any Inductive-based Bible studies that are theologically reformed in nature?
Nope 🙅♂️, reform theology has failed miserably. In light of current events. &
( with so many different views)
Replacement theology has been forced to deny 1Tessalonians 1:10 , .4: 13 --18. and ..5:9 , compared with 3:3.
Not if want a grammatical, literal, & historical hermeneutical approach because otherwise you come to pre millennial view with a dispensational flavor. Unfortunately covenant theology has too many holes to recommend it
Good one! Thank you!
Great discussion ! Always charitable and informing
I heard that song "I wish we'd all been ready" in the Theif in the Night movies, which I like but don't believe in.
If people would just simply read the word of God, pray and seek his wisdom. They would see the truth. Put down your commentary and stop just taking what man says as gospel truth.
Investigate Edward Irving and his impact
The Ancient Antiochene Church taught dispensational theology. I document this fact. I have been teaching theology for many years now. Apostle Paul uses the Greek word for "dispensation" in his letter to the Ephesians.
Paul's use of the word has nothing to do with the Darbyist use of the word. That's like people in the US who justify the "welfare" state because the word exists in the constitution. A big killer for dispensationalist ideas for me was reading early church thinkers and then seeing the Jesuit roots of Dispensationalism. Would a key theology dreamed up by the SS or KGB be one you might just want to second guess? The Jesuits are not your friend.
Excellent !
16 minutes in and I still haven't learned what "dispensationalism" is.
try 1:21:29 in then. It's like watching a movie and saying you still don't know who the bad guy is after the first scene.
@@fteacadia The bad guy is always anybody who tolerates cussing, drinking, unwedded sexual intercourse, smoking, political correctness, or multi-racialism.
Endtimes delusion by steve wohlberg
The 70 weeks of Daniel and the jesuit lie of futurism by uncontrolled oppersition.
Romanism and the reformation from the standpoint of prophecy by H.GRATTON.GUINNESS
Vatican secret society's jesuits and the new world order by KJVIDEOMINSTRIES
Darkness is falling youtube and newtube.
Juggler66
Inquisition update by Tom friess.
Rulers of evil by tupper saussy.
@@trukeesey8715 -- Where in the Bible is smoking said to be a sin? (I don't use tobacco myself, so I am not looking for an excuse.) Also, what do you mean by 'multi-racialism'? There is only one race, the human race (Acts 17:26), and we are all just various shades of brown.
@@gregb6469 You certainly haven't devoted much time to sincere studying of the effects of sundry bloodlines in history, nor the Biblical laws about same.
If you find a "bad guy" you can just about always find that he tolerates smoking. Not a true statement. Think of all of the "bad guys" whom you know about and count how many of them tolerate smoking and how many don't, then report back to me with the numbers.
Listen to Prem Rawat!
Have you ever heard of Otis Sellers? Someone very dear to me reads him stuff only to help her interpret scripture and a lot of what he teaches is questioning to me.
Haven't listened yet. I looked up the definition on two separate occasions and still don't know what it means. Hopin to find it here within a few minutes.
I would have went right to episode 667
Episode 666 is about Dispensationalism. How appropriate !
Dispensationalists will say this episode has received the mark of the beast
Thank you I sure learned alot.
25:45 is awesome “the Old Testament meaning something it didn’t mean until Israel rejected Christ”. If you read Darby’s personal synopsis of Matthew it borders heresy if not heresy itself.
really, prove what you say. that satemet is ridiculous coming from the divine popes of protestanatism. like why dontyou go back to Rome?
One simple way to find out if your church pastors are of the Dispensational camp of theology is to ask them is Matt 24 eschatology written to the Jews and tribulation saints and not the church of born again believers? If they say yes or for the most part, then they are eschatological dispensationalist. That I believe can be dangerous because they believe in the any moment doctrine of Christ return and no prophetic signs that proceed it. It can be even more dangerous if they don't do Bible prophecy updates as related to current events which means their church can be totally caught off guard by the evil plans of Satan's one world system advancing across the earth in the form of the fulfillment of (Daniel 9:26-27 and it's different interpretations) and the seals of Rev 6. If all their eschatological eggs are in the Dispensational camp and it's the wrong theology as I believe, then that is very dangerous and misleading to their congratulations!!! This happened at my church because the current pandemic of the last 2.5 years has caused fear, confusion and deception to cause many pastors, church staff and members to accept the vaccines which the Bible calls a (sorcery) in Rev 18:23-24 which means pharmacies, drugs and poison. Who would have guessed this would be the first seal of Rev 6? Brothers and sisters in Christ get out your concordances and review with a open mind what the word (bow) and (crown) mean in the Greek dictionary in Rev 18:23 and stop relying on commentaries from Dispensational theology. Yes, if we are in the first seal already and I think we sure could be then Daniel 9:26-27 the string firm covenant with the many has already been fulfilled back in May of 2021 by the prince of the people that destroyed the temple and the city (in 70 AD) AKA pope Francis by giving His full support to the (United Nations= the many) of the great reset agenda 30 climate change deception. It was the U.N's agreement that Pope Francis made stronger and firm. Research pope Francis book entitled (Laudato Si) on climate change. Also another critical book to read is entitled (The Real Anthony Fauci) by Robert F Kennedy Jr. It will fully expose the evil behind the gain of function research of the virus and development of the vaccines that Bill Gates, Fauci, the WHO and the vaccine companies and the great reset of the World Economic Forum for massive population reduction by vaccines, food shortages, hyperinflation and wars increasing across the globe. In my humble opinion all the peaces fit this current event prophetically well. Study and consider this yourselves??? ✝ ✝ ✝
It doesn't make sense but things are starting to make sense to me. I've sat in church for many years feeling as though something was wrong. I'll pray and I'll read and I'll feel as low the Holy Spirit is telling me something. I'll then go to church I'll hear a sermon, it's much like hearing a politician speak. What they say lines up with what I feel I have read and the Holy Spirit has spoken to me. But what they mean is the exact opposite. Dispensationalists say they go for a literal interpretation of scripture. How can you take jesus's words in Matthew and say you're speaking literal yet say the church is going to be snatched out of here before the Antichrist is revealed?
Matthew 24:29 Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken: 30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. 31 And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.
bibliajfa.com.br/app/kjv_apocrypha/40N/24/29
@@robinworkman3621 They are very literal except where the text is being literal.
@@doogsterd5311 lol
I have reviewed Calvinism and Covenant Theology for 40 years. I admit I began my walk with Christ as a literalist. I believed that according to Isaiah in the millennium (regardless of its beginning and length) that the government would be on Messiah’s shoulders and He would be seated on His father David’s throne. In Revelation, John reported that in the millennium the devil would be bound. If as I have read that amillennialism is a misnomer and we are in the millennium, could someone explain the evidence of what my eyes see and ears hear? The evidence is that amillennial is no misnomer; there isn’t one. But I don’t believe it.
can you do a video on how covenant theology doesn't support anti-Semitism?
it doesnt matter. if someone merely lifts an eyebrow he is denounced. Take it from Jesus. If they called him Beelzebub, the servant willl be called worse things. If anything is AS, it is dispensationalism. Still blaming them today for what one gen did to Christ long ago.
@@BertGraef sounds just like Critical race theory doesn’t it? 😉
@@BertGraef what do you mean by if anything is AS?
I think I get what you’re trying to say but that one sentence I can’t follow.
@@seasidelife9742 AS is short for anti-s.....
How about a video on Reformed THEOLOGY being anti True Israelites? The Anglo Saxon Celtic Christian nations of the world being Redeemed Israel, the dispersed 12 tribes scattered abroad recovenanted and redeemed in the NEW Covenant fulfilling all prophecies and showing that they are indeed the true Israel by receiving all Abrahams blessings e.g. numberless descendants scattered all over the earth, holding the military strategic points of the world, having the NEW lands God gave them, being a blessing to .the world, material blessings ect
I also would love to see these brothers deal with Detroit Baptist Theological Seminary and Master's Seminary dispensationalism. It seems that Masters and DBTS are a more balanced classic dispensationalism.
But they are still Dispensational Futurists in their Eschatological systems; and that's the main problem, here.
@@ryangallmeier6647 Exactly, it's still the "church Israel distinction" and "pre-trib" rapture theory however you slice it.
Very few modern Christians understand the recent origin of Dispensational Theology. The true source is found below.
Genesis of Dispensational Theology
ua-cam.com/video/Ee4RS5pDntQ/v-deo.html
Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ?
(Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30)
The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations?
1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants?
2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ?
3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds?
4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh?
5. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers?
6. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"?
7. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost?
8. Based on Hebrews 9:15, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.)
9. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9)
10. Watch the UA-cam video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church.
Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology.
Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church:
“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107.
Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323.
John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated…
"...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.”
John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.)
What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16?
Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth?
Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups?
Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and Hebrews 8:6-13?
Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church?
@@SpotterVideo excellent points. The “replacement theology” accusation has some rhetorical bite but no logical or biblical basis as you have demonstrated. It’s a complete failure to deal with the substance of an argument by substitution of “name calling” in place of logic and Biblical exegesis.
All of the dispensational churches I have been to act like you are teaching “damnable heresy” if you don’t fall in line with their Darbyism. Dispensationalism may be the preferred American theology, but it is not the theology of the Bible. In my estimation, JN Darby has done more harm to the church in the last 200 years than any other prominent figure. Whether he intended it or not, his aberrant views have created a new litmus test for orthodoxy among Protestants that was never utilized for 1850’s of church history.
Warning dispensationlist ua-cam.com/video/-d4p2JYWyd0/v-deo.html
Thoroughly enjoyed this episode, Camden. Anytime you can have a guest on who quotes Belinda Carlisle I'm in. I was also surprised that Dispensationalism has/had a foothold in Presbyterianism. Or did I miss understand that? It seems like y'all said that it even was a source of dispensationalism?
dispensationalism does not have a "foothold" in presbyterianism as you claim......legalism and replacement theology has a foothold. dispensationalism are the mysteries reveald to paul that set christianity and all its denominational and historical error arright.
@@flamingrobin5957 "replacement theology" is just a dispy strawman, and "legalism"... do you mean as opposed to the antinomianism that often runs in dispy circles, such that they wouldn't recognize the right use of the law in the first place, or do you mean actual legalism? Actual legalism does not have a foothold.
I believe that dispensationalism has corrupted many a poor soul into this false system of theology. It adds confusion and does not glorify God in any way shape or form. We all need to read And believe God's word. dispensationalism is of men, it could never be found in The Bible without many twist and turns added to it.
A few years back i came across dispensationalism. Had never heard of it. I was very careful with it but even then it began to affect my faith. I totally backed away and came to the conclusion that, as these gentlemen stated in their own way, they are very good at manipulating Scripture. I have also found that for the most part Dispensationalists are very self-righteous and smart-alecky.
One simple way to find out if your church pastors are of the Dispensational camp of theology is to ask them is Matt 24 eschatology written to the Jews and tribulation saints and not the church of born again believers? If they say yes or for the most part, then they are eschatological dispensationalist. That I believe can be dangerous because they believe in the any moment doctrine of Christ return and no prophetic signs that proceed it. It can be even more dangerous if they don't do Bible prophecy updates as related to current events which means their church can be totally caught off guard by the evil plans of Satan's one world system advancing across the earth in the form of the fulfillment of (Daniel 9:26-27 and it's different interpretations) and the seals of Rev 6. If all their eschatological eggs are in the Dispensational camp and it's the wrong theology as I believe, then that is very dangerous and misleading to their congratulations!!! This happened at my church because the current pandemic of the last 2.5 years has caused fear, confusion and deception to cause many pastors, church staff and members to accept the vaccines which the Bible calls a (sorcery) in Rev 18:23-24 which means pharmacies, drugs and poison. Who would have guessed this would be the first seal of Rev 6? Brothers and sisters in Christ get out your concordances and review with a open mind what the word (bow) and (crown) mean in the Greek dictionary in Rev 18:23 and stop relying on commentaries from Dispensational theology. Yes, if we are in the first seal already and I think we sure could be then Daniel 9:26-27 the string firm covenant with the many has already been fulfilled back in May of 2021 by the prince of the people that destroyed the temple and the city (in 70 AD) AKA pope Francis by giving His full support to the (United Nations= the many) of the great reset agenda 30 climate change deception. It was the U.N's agreement that Pope Francis made stronger and firm. Research pope Francis book entitled (Laudato Si) on climate change. Also another critical book to read is entitled (The Real Anthony Fauci) by Robert F Kennedy Jr. It will fully expose the evil behind the gain of function research of the virus and development of the vaccines that Bill Gates, Fauci, the WHO and the vaccine companies and the great reset of the World Economic Forum for massive population reduction by vaccines, food shortages, hyperinflation and wars increasing across the globe. In my humble opinion all the peaces fit this current event prophetically well. Study and consider this yourselves??? ✝ ✝ ✝
Corrupted souls like John McArthur?
Warning dispensationlist ua-cam.com/video/-d4p2JYWyd0/v-deo.html
Without the mystery given to Paul for us today there would be no salvation
Dispensationalism ruined the boomer
Thanks for this.
Haha I never heard of you... Just stumbled here on your 666th episode. Trying to decide if I should stay or run. 😂
It does not matter what your nationality is: You must put ALL your faith in JESUS CHRIST's shed blood and get BAPTIZED in the name of the FATHER and the SON and the HOLY SPIRIT. PLUS be in COMMUNION with JESUS CHRIST then and only then will you go to HEAVEN after you die, otherwise you will go to spend eternity in hell. That is ALL you need to know ! ! ! WHY MAKE THE WHOLE THING SO DIFFICULT ???????????? . . . IT's NUTS ! ! !
Suggest you don't put all on one video recording. Hard to listen all at one go. Thank you.
ONLY GOD IS REVEREND
Good discussion.
within covenants Dispensations changed, not the covenant, but the people. Jews from nomads to a country, one country to two, faithful to unfaithful and more,
Joseph carter I am curious only when I ask how is John MacArthur corrupt?
He isn’t
John Mac Arthur does not believe that the blood of Jesus saves. Look it up.
I love that episode 666 was on dispensationalism
Who do you believe "all Israel" is in Romans 11:26?
I noticed I have received no answers so I will answer it myself. Paul uses "Israel" to refer to national ethnic Israel 9 times in a row starting in Romans 9:27 and culminating in Romans 11:26. I challenge all postmillennialists and amillennialists to show me one example of Israel meaning something else in that section. If none of you do so, I will assume you agree with me.
What contextual clue do you offer that Paul isn't referring to national ethnic Israel in Romans 11:26? Paul explains that a "partial hardening" happened to Israel in Romans 11:25. Would John Calvin claim this is the church? One verse later Calvin claims "all Israel" is the church. The absurdity of this poor exegesis is seen when we look two verses later (11:28) and see they are "enemies of the gospel for your sake." If Calvin is right that "all Israel" is the church in Romans 11:26, then they are also "enemies of the gospel" (vs. 28). How can the church, comprised of believers in the gospel, be enemies of the gospel?
Sadly, the attack on classical dispensationalism is largely and attack on what no longer exists. I am a premillennialist who agrees with the reformed that salvation has always been by faith alone in Christ alone (John 8:56; Rom. 4:3). I believe that regeneration precedes faith (John 6:44; Titus 3:5). I believe that both Jewish and Gentile believers in Christ are the "one new man" (Eph. 2:15) and that only believers in Christ (whether Jew or Gentile) will inherit Christ's Kingdom.
I don't believe there is a distinction between the kingdom of heaven and the kingdom of God. I don't believe the gospels are for one group, while the epistles are for another group. I do believe, however, in good exegesis. Anyone who doesn't acknowledge that believers will initially reign upon the earth in resurrected bodies, as the verses in Rev. 5:10; 20:4 promise, are doing poor exegesis.
Those who don't believe in a future restoration of Israel are attacking the promises of God and are unable to do solid exegesis. For example, partial preterists claim the Olivet Discourse in Matthew 24 was fulfilled in 70 A.D. The Parousia of Christ is mentioned 4 times in this text (Matt. 24:3, 27, 37, 39). The apostle Paul teaches that the Parousia is the event in which believers are given their resurrected bodies (1 Cor. 15:22-23; 1 Thess. 4:15-18). So, either you're a partial preterist and you have to claim there will be two "Parousias" separated by thousands of years (brilliant!), or you have to be a full preterist and claim the resurrection already happened in 70 A.D. and commit the same heresy as Hymenaeus and Philetus (2 Tim. 2:17-18) (even more brilliant!). Can some partial preterist on this site explain how the 16 usages of Parousia for Christ's coming can refer to two comings separated by thousands of years? Can you explain why the Parousia Paul mentions in 1 Cor. 15:23 is different than the Parousia mentioned in the Olivet Discourse? Can some full preterist explain to me why the nations are not going up to Jerusalem to worship Christ as promised in Zechariah 14:16-17?
The poor eschatology of amillennialism and postmillennialism should be "left behind."
Abraham knew and kept all of gonna we laws and Commandments.
what the hell kind of a name is Glodo?
Episode 666 how fitting
There was no " delay ".
God was not shocked that Israel rejected Jesus . It was all in HIS sovereignty and HIS plans
Lol the dispensationalists are gonna have a field day with the fact this episode is number 666! 😂
I caught that too and its down right wrong for believers in Christ to be against one another. So much division in the Body of Christ. Its a waste of time, when we could be doing what we are suppose to be doing, preaching the gospel.
To go out and preach the gospel entails understanding it correctly beforehand.
God's overall plan is saving and redeeming mankind - His whole creation actually, and not just a nation. The center of Scripture is not Israel but JESUS CHRIST. He is the True Israel! Anyone who is in Him is the True People of God! It is not through ethnicity but by faith in Jesus and that alone. Unfortunately, like many Jews in the 1st Century many Christians today seem to miss out the true nature of the Kingdom of God. (Lk. 17 :20-21) 😢🙏
My great grandpappy was reformed and wedded a roman, thus splittin up the family. My side became UCC and Anglo/Norman; and cousins roman and Polish.
@Rodrick One thing is to subscribed to the apostles' description of local government of church, rather than central, if my understanding is aright. At least that part is Biblical, therefore not apostate.
Rodrick your comments have vanished. I haven't clear notion of the exact prescription given by the apostles. You can find them in the N.T. if you so desire.
I highly recommend Lewis Sperry Chafer. Read his 8 Vol work on the subject.
Read Eph 3:1-10 kjb to see the Lord gave this dispensation to Paul and these teachers rightly divide unlike darby or any other liar.
Donnie Holt (Grace For Today Bible Fellowship) Solid
David Reid (Columbus Bible Church) really breaks down subjects
Justin Johnson (Grace Ambassadors) talks fast but knows his stuff
Brian Sipes (Charity Bible Church) He sounds a little country but don’t be fooled he’s got 50 yrs of right division behind him
Paul Lucas (Hillview Baptist Church) his belief is mid acts dispensation not baptist
EC Moore (berean bible study ecm)this guy passed about 10 or 20 yrs ago but was solid as a rock
Byron Wiggins (Grace Believers)this church is in pensacola or milton
Great theologian but sadly mistaken as to pre-trib and hyper-Calvinism
He was smiling right before episode 666 started 😏😏😏😆
Made my way over. Good to see you went before me ahahaha
@@TheBrotherOfPeter lollllll
Warning dispensationlist ua-cam.com/video/-d4p2JYWyd0/v-deo.html
Is it just me, or does anyone else notice that the episode number is 666 😂 😂😂😂
Wasn't aware until the 32 Minute marker that this was a negative view of dispensationalism . Wish it hadn't been so wishy washy then I wouldn't have wasted so much time listening to this .
I heard someone mention dispensationalism and didn’t know what it meant.... so I started looking.... it’s good to know despite being an atheist... good information guys
Atheism: the faith that something came from nothing.
Dispensationalism is one of the keys to the whole Christian Zionist movement. Has an idea that the government of Israel is the Fulfillment of biblical prophecy, therefore anything it does is for God and on God's side. That's one of the dangerous implications of this thinking.
It also can lead people to be fatalistic about the future, "The whole world is going to burn soon. Why try to improve things, it doesn't matter, the Lord is coming in a few years anyway." I heard so many people voice that sentiment.
These guys below teach dispensationalism not the darby nonsense being promoted here as the truth
Donnie Holt (Grace For Today Bible Fellowship) Solid
David Reid (Columbus Bible Church) really breaks down subjects
Justin Johnson (Grace Ambassadors) talks fast but knows his stuff
Brian Sipes (Charity Bible Church) He sounds a little country but don’t be fooled he’s got 50 yrs of right division behind him
Paul Lucas (Hillview Baptist Church) his belief is mid acts dispensation not baptist
EC Moore (berean bible study ecm)this guy passed about 10 or 20 yrs ago but was solid as a rock
Byron Wiggins (Grace Believers)this church is in pensacola or milton
Bigmyke you still an atheist???
If you are that is not a choice of your own. Let me explain this.
God chooses who will come into his presence, we don't have any choice either way. Psalms 65:4 (KJV) Blessed is the man whom thou choosest, and causest to approach unto thee, that he may dwell in thy courts: we shall be satisfied with the goodness of thy house, even of thy holy temple.
John 15:16 (KJV) Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and ordained you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in my name, he may give it you.
So if we do not choose him but he in biblical fact chooses us, then what about the responsibility to those who seem to be antagonist or atheist? It is said that Jesus Christ is the Saviour of the world and I happen to be one that believes just that, so although he may be calling and choosing some during this age, that does not mean that he has forgotten those he has not chosen into his Priesthood. In fact those that will be saved in the ages to come are the very reason why God is choosing his Priesthood in this age. 🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻
Every knee shall one day bow and every tongue shall one day confess Jesus Christ to being their Lord no matter what state they are in today or in the past. 🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻
Saying that Dispensationalism has an a priori discontinuity, but Covenant Theology doesn't have an a priori continuity about Israel and the Church is just accepting reality.
Both sides have presuppositions.
Overall great discussion.
Read the book "Abraham's Four Seeds" by John G. Reisinger, to see the problems with both Reformed Covenant Theology, which is about 400 years old, and with Dispensational Theology, which is about 200 years old.
Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, modern man-made systems fall apart.
Covenant theology is as man made as dispensationalism. Both are built upon unbiblical presuppositions
1:04:10 Discussion of Dispensationalism arising in times when the newspapers are presenting bad news.
Okay. Fair enough.
Now do the impact of Platonic dualism and Allegoric method effecting Augustine's transition from earthly Premillennialism to spiritual Amillenialism.
Amil didn't arise out of a vacuum.
You can go and find Augustine's actually writings on why he went Amil and it's very similar to how some go Premil based on external influences rather than a positive analysis of the Text.
I don't think Ammillenialism is just spiritual. I see it as playing out in Western Christendom and the Christian nations now being deceived in the current time ( as I see it) of Satan's LOOSING Rev 20:7-9
“Safe and effective”? Sure. Why would I go to a doctor who encouraged and even shamed me to get the jab? Do you think he/she would have the humility, and reflective capacity to take me seriously? And worse yet, even want to treat me? Health care is now an industry driven one common denominator. Profits at all costs. Care and concern is a distant memory. In just a couple of generations we have gone from house-calls to 24hr. waits in hospital ERs. Doesn’t sound like progress to me.
40:45 - massive assertion made hehehe
Paraphrase
"NT speaking of being Jewish as not an ethnic distinction, but based on belief in Christ."
This is a discussion of Romans 11. This a massive leap that was just stated in passing. You have to prove that.
This didn't help my understanding of the history.
Oh so I shouldn't bother then. I have same feeling. I'm 15 min in and think this won't answer my questions.
@@destinycoach5 I am happy my comment was helpful
Episode 666?
Amazing Reformed folk can dissect dispensationalism while bowing before Augustinian heresies
59:00 This is a good critique of classic Dispensationalism. The view that nothing about the Mosaic Covenant took the Jews from grace under Abrahamic to law under Moses.
Mosaic Covenant administered the Blessings of the Abrahamic (blessings and curses) and ultimately directed the people to Christ. The law was not an afterthought, but necessary to move the progress of Redemptive History.
1:01:00 great points.
Are pastors not to preach one thing and one thing only The Gospel, the saving grace of Christ. The telling souls of the need to be Born Again in order to redeemed
The Truth is very very simple, if revealed, it is Coventantial between the Old & New Testaments
Where the Old Covenant is to Land Inheritance, given way to the New Covenant which is Inheritance unto God himself, orginally envisioned by God when he first cut the Covenant with Abraham, comes through the revelation of the Ark of the Covenant to the Prophecy of Jeremiah (also called as the Prophet of the New Covenant) in 2 Macabees 2 , 4 -8, (OT) & in the NT again by the words of the Christ "You know not the Father neither the Son but them unto whom the Son pleases to reveal" God changes not,
Truth is not by dispensations for truth is not many, but one,
True Israel gave birth to the Church following the Ark of the Covenant, likewise the true Church follow Israel & the Ark
It was not the intention of God to contain his Holy Ark of the Covenant in a temple cut by hand unto his words " Heaven is my throne & earth my footstool" but for the sake of David allowed Solomon to build it, not surprisingly it never found rest in it, meant to dwell in the hearts of men (Ye are the temple of the living God) so became removed & the temple destroyed, The only reason for the 2nd temple was for the Messiah to enter it, finding it Corrupted used the whip to overturn the TABLES, the tables of the leavens of the Pharisees (Jew) & Herod (Gentiles), the leavens of the LAW/FAITH resp After which the temple was destroyed before which was filled with Zeus
Now, intending to rebuild the 3rd temple only to be filled with man made hinduism (Egypt) & its 33 million gods, veiled in THEOSOPHY mingled with FREEMASONRY, the White house rather the White Horse of the Apoclapse, its political seat, reveals Zechariah 5, incidentally the two lamb like horns off the 2nd Beast of revelations, except that which restrains the rebuilding are the Muslims, rather Islam, till the restrainer be taken out of the way & the temple to be filled with the said Abominations, lead to the serpents Lie at Eden "Ye be as gods" (without God) Man as God to the Abomination of Desolation as spoken by Prophet Daniel, ushering in the Day of the Lord (Joel)
These events are condensed in the prophecy of 2 Thessoionians 2 ,
I believe that God is smart enough to say what HE means, without any man's imagination of "allegorical" teaching . Luke 24:46
do you class allegorical and figurative as the same??
Ya know it really bothers me when people who are so call theologians make fun and laugh at what people believe. Every covenant theologians I've heard belittle dispensatiolist. Which I believe you will never convert one person to covenant theology because of your immature approach to theology. Example you laugh at people who believe in a rapture and play them off as uneducated, silly women being led astray. Is this how you convert people. Belittle them, then laugh at them. Then because they don't believe as you. You cast them off as lost, unsaved, heretics, one guy even went so far as calling the blasphemers and will be in the lake of fire with the devil.
Yet in all that I don't hear dispensationalist belittling covenant theology. They will say they don't agree but I've yet heard one actually say the other is silly uneducated or anything else.
Spend 2 hours physically active for every 1 hour sedentary: walkin, sports, aerobics, swimmin, climbin trees, and so on.
Word search
The Gospels 65k words compared Pauline Epistles 37k words
God 316 God 567
Jesus 625 Jesus 221
Christ 60 Christ 395
Kingdom 127 Kingdom 14
Law 41 Law 135
Gospel 15 Gospel 74
Spirit 66 Spirit 130
Believe 140 Believe 61
Faith 29 Faith 139
Grace 5 Grace 91
Church 3 Church 42
Baptism/ baptize 70 Baptism/ baptize 16
Gentiles 17 Gentiles 50
Body 39 Body 84
Trust 4 Trust 19
Mystery 3 Mystery 20
Dispensation 0 Dispensation 4
Revelation 0 Revelation 8
1Cor 9:17 For if I do this thing willingly, I have a reward: but if against my will, a dispensation of the gospel is committed unto me.
Eph 1:10 That in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; even in him:
Eph 3:2 If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward:
Col 1:25 Whereof I am made a minister, according to the dispensation of God which is given to me for you, to fulfill the word of God;
The word dispensation does not mean the same thing that the doctrine teaches.
Dispensationalist: Whats a Darby? Whats a Scofield?
Answer: Its where all the teachings you believe came from Einstein!
I can give you the names of several books that refute that claim.
@@biblehistoryscience3530 Dispensationalism is a false teaching. It is not found in Scripture. Even if they got it from someone else it doesn't change the fact that it did NOT come from Scripture! And they certainly did their parts to popularize the false doctrine.
@@biblehistoryscience3530 No books needed. Our savior plainly told us there is no such thing as dispensationalism.
Matthew 5:17-18
“Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished.
@@biblehistoryscience3530 I can give you 1. The BIBLE!!!
DISPENSATIONALISM IS NOT IN IT. It is INSERTED into the text which is read OUT OF CONTEXT by Dispensational nitwits