Norand Mono: Are 15 envelopes and 18 LFOs enough for 1 Monosynth?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 63

  • @galacticmonkey810
    @galacticmonkey810 Рік тому +2

    I must say, you have the best demos on the internet 👏

  • @FUNKINETIK
    @FUNKINETIK 2 роки тому +5

    Some crazy connections going on inside that machine. Great, soothing presentation, easy to tell you’re quite excited and amazed by the Norand.
    P E A C E : )

    • @OscillatorSink
      @OscillatorSink  2 роки тому

      Yeah, it's definitely the sort of instrument I'd be excited to build a set around. In fact, perhaps I will...

  • @iqnill
    @iqnill Рік тому +2

    I've had mine only for a few hours and I want another one!

  • @Screenshot1015
    @Screenshot1015 2 роки тому +4

    I bought one immediately after watching this

  • @eggyben
    @eggyben 2 роки тому +2

    love this synth!!!
    norand as a company are also amazing and very responsive

    • @OscillatorSink
      @OscillatorSink  2 роки тому +2

      My interactions with them so far have been spot on and they definitely seem dedicated to improving the synth with software updates over time which is always very nice to see.

  • @Mr.Tubster
    @Mr.Tubster 2 роки тому +3

    Thx for sharing mate 🙂 Cya geezy

  • @jibberer
    @jibberer 2 роки тому +2

    7:09 that driven band pass does indeed sound amazing!

    • @OscillatorSink
      @OscillatorSink  2 роки тому +2

      Right?! Is it just me, or has "Big Lowpass" been pedalling its propaganda for too long? We've been brainwashed to believe that Lowpass filters are the "defacto" filter type - it's time for Bandpass liberation!

    • @jibberer
      @jibberer 2 роки тому +1

      @@OscillatorSink Big Lowpass is trying to lower our vibrational frequencies in order to control us man. Choose band pass... choose your own vibrational frequencies.

    • @OscillatorSink
      @OscillatorSink  2 роки тому +2

      We resonate as one. This is one conspiracy theory I can get behind.

    • @jibberer
      @jibberer 2 роки тому

      @@OscillatorSink Totally!

  • @cymbolic_space1832
    @cymbolic_space1832 2 роки тому +1

    so i have been on a quest to find the best bass synth for my dawless setup. something non-typical, lots of modulation, no keyboard, midi-friendly, save-able patches, lots of hands on control for patching, must be able to do deep soft subs. finally my prayers may have been answered.

  • @Decoy303
    @Decoy303 2 роки тому +1

    Would love to see a video of this paired with Twisted Electrons' Blast Beats. If not for the sweet music they could make together then for how rad they would look side by side.

    • @OscillatorSink
      @OscillatorSink  2 роки тому +1

      I've lusted over a number of the TE instruments in the past, but they've never quite made it to the top of my list. Maybe 2023.

  • @sebbosebbo9794
    @sebbosebbo9794 Рік тому +1

    this sequencer is more learnable useable then the Leploop s. . . .
    offer some amazing modulation control...nice ...thx...

  • @erlendmagnussen8922
    @erlendmagnussen8922 2 роки тому +1

    Fab!

  • @ikarugamoo
    @ikarugamoo 2 роки тому +5

    At last. I'm always baffled by the lack of LFOs and Envelopes on synths these days. I simply can't believe that they are that juicy on DSP or CPU (scrub out whatever is the right there!) and when ASM put 5 LFO and envelopes on the Hydrasynth it felt like it was a WOW moment yet still baffled why so few. Now that said too many can be overkill. Maybe that's so here but at last, at last, the chance to put that to test. Great stuff!!!

    • @OscillatorSink
      @OscillatorSink  2 роки тому +1

      I think, despite my glib clickbaity title, the thing that makes it make sense is less to think about there being "lots" of modulators and instead think of it in terms of "modulator per knob", and then it's like: "yeah, of course that makes sense as something I'd want. It's not perfect in every case of course - sometimes you might want common modulators going to multiple places or a more complex mod matrix, but if this is an experiment to see if it can work - I'd say yes.
      Interestingly (to me at least), I did come up with one other unit I can think of that uses this approach. It's not a synth, but the Bastl Thyme does the 'modulator per knob' thing too.

    • @s3nsec0rruptr80
      @s3nsec0rruptr80 2 роки тому +1

      They're lacking because norand took them all lol

    • @Getthenderson
      @Getthenderson 2 роки тому +1

      Oh please do a thing on the Bastl Thyme, it's my favourite effect!

    • @OscillatorSink
      @OscillatorSink  2 роки тому

      It's one of those things I almost bought a bunch of times. Maybe one day...

    • @Leo9ine
      @Leo9ine 2 роки тому

      This is precisely what modular is for. I too lamented the lack of LFOs and EGs on mainstream synths - so I stopped using them and ""built"" my own.

  • @martintaylor9205
    @martintaylor9205 2 роки тому +3

    Great review OS as ever,SURGEON been using one for few months now with Pulsar 23 Torso T1 Blackbox
    👍🌈🆒🎶

    • @OscillatorSink
      @OscillatorSink  2 роки тому +1

      This would be a great pairing with a Pulsar 23 - I'm jealous of that setup!

    • @cymbolic_space1832
      @cymbolic_space1832 2 роки тому

      gosh dang. Anthony is always cutting the edge.

  • @johnrichardson3297
    @johnrichardson3297 2 роки тому +2

    Oscillator Sink can this replace the need for Avalon Analogue Bassline?

    • @OscillatorSink
      @OscillatorSink  2 роки тому +2

      I'm not that familiar with it. It looks like they are aiming to do different things despite their similarities. The Avalon, from reading, looks like an "elevated" 303 whereas the Mono is a different beast that just happens to have an X0X sequencer. On paper, personally, the Norand is definitely more exciting from my perspective, and can do a good 303 impression if needed, but it'll be down to what you want/need.

    • @jjurksztowicz
      @jjurksztowicz 2 роки тому +2

      The Avalon is more 303 than 303. It has a sublime squelch. This guy gives me more modern Aphex vibes. I want both but I’m a total acid fanatic.

  • @BackspinZX
    @BackspinZX 2 роки тому +3

    Now they need to give use LFOs to modulate the envelopes and envelopes to modulate the LFOs that are modulating all the knobs.

    • @OscillatorSink
      @OscillatorSink  2 роки тому +1

      Well they do kinda give us the second one already and you *can* modulate the amp envelope with the X-Mod... So Norand are way ahead of you!

    • @OscillatorSink
      @OscillatorSink  2 роки тому +3

      Now - if I could modulate the speed of each LFO with an LFO...

    • @BackspinZX
      @BackspinZX 2 роки тому +2

      @@OscillatorSink 18 MORE LFOS

    • @millenniummastering
      @millenniummastering 2 роки тому

      @@OscillatorSink You can with a midi LFO to cc 78 Active X-Mod Rate, but only the 1 X-mod

  • @zbsfm
    @zbsfm 2 роки тому +3

    Great video as always! I would love to hear the synth a bit louder / your voice a bit quieter, but it's a nitpick.

    • @g3cd
      @g3cd 2 роки тому +2

      to me, it was perfect. I hate it when I have to turn down the volume whenever a synth starts to play in a video just because the creator didn't get the balance right between voice over and music. Please leave it like it is.

    • @zbsfm
      @zbsfm 2 роки тому

      @@g3cd yeah, it can for sure swing both ways

  • @FairuzOsman
    @FairuzOsman 2 роки тому +2

    Idk why but this reminds me of the sh-101

    • @gosh-heckadecimal
      @gosh-heckadecimal 2 роки тому +1

      Yes with novamod and massive digital control laid on top of it.

  • @mike2884
    @mike2884 Рік тому +2

    No....these are CLEARLY not enough envelopes and LFOs.....
    We would like 1000 more please....and frequencies ranging from plank units of time to lifespans of black holes.

    • @pariaheep
      @pariaheep 10 місяців тому

      😆😆😆

  • @zayR6
    @zayR6 2 роки тому

    😭

  • @mister2628
    @mister2628 2 роки тому +1

    No. ;)

  • @FastRCToys
    @FastRCToys 2 роки тому

    840 $ ? Is this an april fool ???

    • @OscillatorSink
      @OscillatorSink  2 роки тому +2

      Small company making a high quality boutique product with a unique feature set and actively developing updates and enhancements. Things don't have to be cheap to represent good value.

    • @FastRCToys
      @FastRCToys 2 роки тому

      @@OscillatorSink This is by far no a good value.. Just earing the sounds ;).

    • @OscillatorSink
      @OscillatorSink  2 роки тому

      @@FastRCToys ok

    • @Cericle
      @Cericle 2 роки тому

      @@OscillatorSink josé

    • @xfghffhfg
      @xfghffhfg 2 роки тому

      @FastRCToys I think you got to the wrong place