What can even be said about Donna Haraway to pay due respect. I've never heard a compelling argument that any philosopher of recent history did it better. If I had to choose one poet or one philospher for people of today to enjoy, it would be her. Note, I dont say "study." One can of course study Donna Haraways work and genius and be all the better forbit but its not even necessary because she actually did the nearly impossible: brought joy to academic philosophy. I can only imagine that in my generation (the one after her) there are also some wonderful voices that until now have been underappreciated in the larger society. Even people who dont 'get' what Dr Haraway is talking about can find in her books and talks a kind of music that transcends mere meaning as much as the opposite. What a treasure. What an unsubg genius. Whe the world gets honest and "history" starts being "everyonestory" then we'll see her mentioned next to Einstein as a reference for genius.
This is just brilliant. Witty, deep and insightful. I'm researching second wave feminism/cyberfeminism/xenofeminism and this is a PERFECT compliment to those studies. Obviously it's a little dense and will need several passes to let it all sink in, nothing wrong with that! Thanks for the upload.
She has such clear step beside of all boarder thinkers, she is just so independent and she all hug all hug the world critters and women….however, she is just the most convincing talkers of our times…"we are children of compost…"
What wonderful word soup this woman produces. Such a meaningful absence of form as substance takes form in lush and lustrious speech. It puts forth its meaning in words that make the reader realize that the answers are already to be found inside, if you only are willing to look harder. No doubt there is even more meaning in her words than can be separated from them just by examining them as mere words through obscuring lens of scrutiny.
20 years later, emergence remains causally indeterminate. We know the what, the how and very often also the where but we do not know the why. Awesome lecture.
I was given this link by my professor and am suppose to answer Why Dona thinks that we are all cyborgs? What is so unique about her statements and her philosophical position that you find fascinating? Do you agree or disagree with her? but maybe I'm just distracted by all the dog talk but I dont really see how this lecture relates to cyborg anthropology at all...
What sort of background do you need to understand this? I am curious because I have been wanting to look deeper into the notion of "Feminist Programming Languages" and this type of theory is involved.
I see this lecture as being embedded within/around the intersections of critical animal studies, philosophical anthropology (anthropological philosophy), genetics, dog training and breeding, cultural evolution, feminist philosophy, linguistic philosophy, metaphysics, ethology (especially symbiosis), postmodern theory, and posthumanism discourses. Brushings with deep-ecological and related literature were also minorly helpful to my own understanding of this lecture as were my encounters with Haraway's previous work that I can succinctly but imperfectly lump under technohumanism studies.
hey you appear to have a good understanding of this lecture, I was given this link by my professor and am suppose to answer Why Dona thinks that we are all cyborgs? What is so unique about her statements and her philosophical position that you find fascinating? Do you agree or disagree with her? but maybe im just distracted by all the dog talk but I dont really see how this lecture relates to cyborg anthropology at all...
@@alliedesjardins5711 A bit late maybe; but essentially humans interacting with technology is so symbiotic and interwoven that she regards the nature/technology dichotomy as a false one - technology is merely an expression of natural (human) productivity and enhances/enables it further, so to speak. Really, in this talk she extends this understanding of the human as a cyborg further to regard all species as companion species. At least that's how I understood it. To sum it up, your prof's questions kinda suck for this video, The Cyborg Manifesto is from like '85 or sth.
Beautiful, beautiful thought. It reflects that truth that one lives, that laugh and sprint of joy one gets out of the authentic being. All life strives towards beauty- the overman is the achievement of human beauty, it’s golden gleam. Beauty is the culmination of life, in it represents ripeness, plenitude, climax of existence. And to such moments of beauty we must all strive, until we are beautiful ourselves, like children.
Can you please explain what the focus on bodily fluids, ooze and slime are about with cyberfeminism? What's the connection between that and feminism and what women like?
she's far sighted (common when you get older). She needs the glasses to read the paper, but they make the room blurry when she looks up at the people. So to see the paper (and remind herself of what she wants to say) she puts on the glasses; to see the people shes talking to (so she can see their faces and gauge their reactions and see whats going on in the room) she need to take off the glasses.
@@celeritas2-810 Maybe she is. We don't know and that's exactly the point. I think multispecies relationships should be a recognition and celebration of unknowability rather than a rendering knowable (which comes with it's own consequences)
have you guys seen the film m3gan? well, at the very end, they killed m3gan. justice for m3gan. justice for haraway. justice for feminist technoscience.
Mandingus Before the constitution and the union, people had the freedom to start their own sovereign communities. Now we are all forced to adopt a humanist values system. See Kim Davis for example.
Words ARE logical intelligence. She had 0 cognitive empathy to realize that no one will be able to fucking understand her. What we are witnessing is an autistic savant.
She's fun to listen to. But there is no basic difference between *this* bullshit and Jordan Peterson's Maps of Meaning bullshit. Despite what JP might say.
![Would We Be Better Off Without Religion? - Christopher Hitchens [2007] ✝️ | Intelligence Squared](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/DIR7_X-ahy4/mqdefault.jpg)
What can even be said about Donna Haraway to pay due respect. I've never heard a compelling argument that any philosopher of recent history did it better. If I had to choose one poet or one philospher for people of today to enjoy, it would be her. Note, I dont say "study." One can of course study Donna Haraways work and genius and be all the better forbit but its not even necessary because she actually did the nearly impossible: brought joy to academic philosophy. I can only imagine that in my generation (the one after her) there are also some wonderful voices that until now have been underappreciated in the larger society. Even people who dont 'get' what Dr Haraway is talking about can find in her books and talks a kind of music that transcends mere meaning as much as the opposite. What a treasure. What an unsubg genius. Whe the world gets honest and "history" starts being "everyonestory" then we'll see her mentioned next to Einstein as a reference for genius.
I don’t understand anything why
this lecture is not aimed at „normal people“, but at peers familiar to the field. the target audience is an academic audience of social scientists.
This is just brilliant. Witty, deep and insightful. I'm researching second wave feminism/cyberfeminism/xenofeminism and this is a PERFECT compliment to those studies. Obviously it's a little dense and will need several passes to let it all sink in, nothing wrong with that! Thanks for the upload.
I love her so much, she's so freaky!
i adore her! reading one of her books now for a paper. but this is really difficult to understand^^""" a lot of new words going on there
Could you not just explain what you're talking about clearly first, or to conclude? I have no idea what this was about.
Because its nonsense
She is a real distinguished scholar.
This is interesting and inspiring to an architecture PhD here as well. I think she touched the hard topic with her own wisdom and attitude. Brilliant!
She has such clear step beside of all boarder thinkers, she is just so independent and she all hug all hug the world critters and women….however, she is just the most convincing talkers of our times…"we are children of compost…"
What wonderful word soup this woman produces. Such a meaningful absence of form as substance takes form in lush and lustrious speech. It puts forth its meaning in words that make the reader realize that the answers are already to be found inside, if you only are willing to look harder. No doubt there is even more meaning in her words than can be separated from them just by examining them as mere words through obscuring lens of scrutiny.
yes, this the brilliance she offers, far broader than the topic, an invitation to be more alive
holy crap... didn't realize there was a violently anti-Donna group out there. Wasn't going to use her work but now I feel otherwise inclined
who is anti-donna?
Her style. It's hard to find something that makes me focus this closely to what is being said.
20 years later, emergence remains causally indeterminate. We know the what, the how and very often also the where but we do not know the why. Awesome lecture.
I believe it would concurrently answer the secret to the origin of life.
10:40 Multiple de-centerings, multiple wounds to narcissism that the ontological human has had to suffer
It actually gets much better if you double the speed
But what about ... cats?!
I would love to see some about them too
Oh man look up toxoplasmosis yeah. Cats and humans is scary.
I was given this link by my professor and am suppose to answer
Why Dona thinks that we are all cyborgs?
What is so unique about her statements and her philosophical position that you find fascinating? Do you agree or disagree with her?
but maybe I'm just distracted by all the dog talk but I dont really see how this lecture relates to cyborg anthropology at all...
I am in the same class. 30 minutes in and I am also at a loss.
Maybe spirit is a potential vs trait?
Between shifting translation transforming glad I found that video again and again
so much love for her!!!!!
Thanks for uploading this UCB!
Brilliant and hilarious!
She's awesome!
can someone put some subtitles please??? even english plzplz
Humans are not the top dogs; what is the relationship of all things to each other and where is it all going; followed by some comments and ideas.
Anyone thinking about entering college debt, skip the degree and learn for free by watching lectures all day on UA-cam.
What sort of background do you need to understand this? I am curious because I have been wanting to look deeper into the notion of "Feminist Programming Languages" and this type of theory is involved.
I see this lecture as being embedded within/around the intersections of critical animal studies, philosophical anthropology (anthropological philosophy), genetics, dog training and breeding, cultural evolution, feminist philosophy, linguistic philosophy, metaphysics, ethology (especially symbiosis), postmodern theory, and posthumanism discourses. Brushings with deep-ecological and related literature were also minorly helpful to my own understanding of this lecture as were my encounters with Haraway's previous work that I can succinctly but imperfectly lump under technohumanism studies.
philosophy, anthropology, geography, sociology, etc.
hey you appear to have a good understanding of this lecture, I was given this link by my professor and am suppose to answer
Why Dona thinks that we are all cyborgs?
What is so unique about her statements and her philosophical position that you find fascinating? Do you agree or disagree with her?
but maybe im just distracted by all the dog talk but I dont really see how this lecture relates to cyborg anthropology at all...
@@alliedesjardins5711 A bit late maybe; but essentially humans interacting with technology is so symbiotic and interwoven that she regards the nature/technology dichotomy as a false one - technology is merely an expression of natural (human) productivity and enhances/enables it further, so to speak. Really, in this talk she extends this understanding of the human as a cyborg further to regard all species as companion species. At least that's how I understood it. To sum it up, your prof's questions kinda suck for this video, The Cyborg Manifesto is from like '85 or sth.
Thanks so much for this being available
Beautiful, beautiful thought. It reflects that truth that one lives, that laugh and sprint of joy one gets out of the authentic being. All life strives towards beauty- the overman is the achievement of human beauty, it’s golden gleam. Beauty is the culmination of life, in it represents ripeness, plenitude, climax of existence. And to such moments of beauty we must all strive, until we are beautiful ourselves, like children.
Can you please explain what the focus on bodily fluids, ooze and slime are about with cyberfeminism? What's the connection between that and feminism and what women like?
So hard to follow what she’s saying
She is brilliant.
Por favor alguien que lo traduzca al español
Why does she keep removing her glasses and putting them on again, it's driving me madd🤣
she's far sighted (common when you get older). She needs the glasses to read the paper, but they make the room blurry when she looks up at the people. So to see the paper (and remind herself of what she wants to say) she puts on the glasses; to see the people shes talking to (so she can see their faces and gauge their reactions and see whats going on in the room) she need to take off the glasses.
thank you for uploading this! :)
The nuclear wound is the psychedelic wound 🙏🏿
is she generating these words at random?
+gurp chirp I know, right? Thumbs up!
She practices ... a similar cant of lawyering.
ok super mario santa claus
p sure she was one of the big targets for Alan Sokal and his ilk back in the 90s.
Make of that what you will.
Look at her hand position in the thumbnail image for this video and you will learn her true intentions.
Relationallity? WHY DOES SHE NOT SPEAK SIMPLY?
hey its the girl from ghost in the shell 2 :O
+COURT_FILMS
44:36 M'kay
+OverlordOfEcchi ghost in the shell 2 forensics lab scene check it out :O
Well, she has to have something going for her.
Yes, incited debate...
her neuroticism is apparent. passionate scholar. we thank her.
I agree with most of what she says but isn't she sometimes guilty of anthropomorphising Ms. Cayenne Pepper
:D
Maybe Ms Cayenne Pepper was also guilty of cynomorphising Professor Donna Haraway
@@celeritas2-810 Maybe she is. We don't know and that's exactly the point. I think multispecies relationships should be a recognition and celebration of unknowability rather than a rendering knowable (which comes with it's own consequences)
great
Okay, so this is what Vogon poetry really sounds like.
accurate
Perfect cyborg of academic hubris and intellectual haughtiness.
turn out the lights and tap that raw.... no doubt
yikes
21:42 sus
She reminds me of Jane Fonda
have you guys seen the film m3gan? well, at the very end, they killed m3gan. justice for m3gan. justice for haraway. justice for feminist technoscience.
Modern day social engineering
This kind of verbal deconstructionism does violence to the nuanced complexities that make civilization function.
SeanMauer says the clown with a Confederate flag behind him
Mandingus
Since it's inception the USA has been on a trajectory toward rule by elitists.
Go ahead, elaborate
Mandingus
Before the constitution and the union, people had the freedom to start their own sovereign communities. Now we are all forced to adopt a humanist values system. See Kim Davis for example.
+SeanMauer go on
What happens when you have a ton of verbal intelligence but zero logical intelligence.
Words ARE logical intelligence. She had 0 cognitive empathy to realize that no one will be able to fucking understand her. What we are witnessing is an autistic savant.
I don`t doubt Donna`s qualifications but sadly I cannot listen to her.
oh no
She's fun to listen to. But there is no basic difference between *this* bullshit and Jordan Peterson's Maps of Meaning bullshit. Despite what JP might say.
thanks for all the pedantic bs
Cliche'. Not even humorous.
This woman scares me
Has this person had any brushes with Skavoj Zizek? Like, has either individual commented on the other or something of that sort?