"This upcoming war with the British was entirely avoidable. In our previous war we had the British dead to right. I had my boot on their neck. All I had to do was twist my foot and the British empire would have ceased to exist."
I for one quite enjoy the battles even with reduced fps. I also think the fleet size should be their first step in limiting battle size, say a max of 50 per fleet with at 100 total ship max in battle. Besides, real battles basically never exceeded 100 anyway, with some three exceptions out of thousands.
What they should do for a battle this size is introduce reinforcements at certain increments. An initial engagement fleet, and supporting task groups arriving in so many minutes
Either that or a concept from Stellaris - command limit. Each class of ship has a certain cost, and your fleets cannot exceed that cost. So you can plop, say, 10 battleships in a fleet and nothing else, or 30 DDs and nothing else, or any mix thereof. Then tie it to the tech tree as something you can unlock as time goes by. Early eras, smaller fleets. Later eras, larger fleets but not excessively so. With the fleets broken up you still slug it out, but now you're taking that 200v200 battle and making it 4 50v50s. In modern navel history there have only been, what, 3 battles where the total number of ships was close to, or exceeded, the number of ships fielded by the British in this video. And those battles were waged across a surface area hundreds to thousands of times larger than what is modeled here.
Dude! I literally was sitting here watching these every day and I'm thinking this guy has at least 500k. Your content is really good! keep it up! Watching these religiously like I do jingles
@@Stealth17Gaming honestly his related video feed is how I found you. And I found all the games I enjoy playing/can play from him. Going to build my own PC/or buy it because I'm lazy and try this game out. They should bring it to Xbox. I think it could do fine.
New sub here. I know it's an "old" campaign, I just wanted to let you know that I'm enjoying it immensely, particularly the Admiral's Log and the way you weave a story into the campaign. And your ridiculous "meme" ships, although they turn out usually to be not all that ridiculous once they meet the enemy. Your designs have taught me a lot about what can and cannot be done in the design screen, which is one of my favorite aspects of this game. Mostly, though, it has given me ideas that I would have never thought of myself! Anyway, just thought you should know. Keep up the good work!
I have a suggestion for the dev's on limiting ships in battles (i had one with 730ish enemy vessels earlier, at only a handful of fps (it was also roughly 80% of the enemy's total ships)) , write it off as how many ships were able to actually gather/muster for the battle before the engagement began. You could base it on the maneuver warfare tech and/or the radio technology (as well as what radios you've equipped on your ship to make them more valuable). The more ships you have the more likely some are to miss the battle as they can't properly coordinate (considering the range circles that are supposed to represent where a fleet is projecting power it could be the fleet is spread out with elements scouting or working in smaller groups). It would make it as if elements of both fleets were clashing as they found one another. This would also leave room for ships to potentially arrive late to the battle as reinforcements. Anyway , the higher the tech the more ships should be able to reliably arrive in good order, but there should still be a ceiling even with max tech. (thinking something of a logarithmic curve)
The Admiral Logs again. They are absolutely amazing keep up the great writing! Also there is a game called Buccaneers! that is really interesting. There are ships to buy and bounties to collect plus an amazing story line. The content is limited, you only really need 10 hours to play the full game. But its a fun game with trading and crew mechanics and is a really interesting game to play. Please check it out it fits the content here pretty well.
Oh yes, glory to the slideshow presentation of the battle. I agree there has to be a set limit for how many ships can be in a battle at once. Also I'd like to see an option at campaign start to adjust the overall economy (something similar to Rule the Waves has). I just prefer smaller fleets to play with.
Technically even scarier when you convert the 8 inches to mm. It's not 140 or 152 mm secondaries. It's 203 mm. Straight up primary gun size of WOWS high tier cruisers. (Assuming you mean World of Warships)
Don't belittle yourself. When you're outnumbered an astonishing 47-to-1 and the game offers to allow you to "end battle" early, and you decline the chance... and then you go on to sink three of those enemy ships without losing any of your own? Yeah, that's when they start speaking your name in the same tones that are usually reserved for Nelson, Yi Sun-Sin, or Nimitz.
As a thought for a future campaign: luxury liners the navy. All and only cruisers (cruise ships) with maximum crew quarters. Bonus points for long cruises, though of course there must be something for those only looking for a week long getaway.
I would like to give the Wurttenbergs some credit; in the case of historical Kaiserliche Marina, the High Seas Fleet was critically low on oil, so the older coal fired ships were very much useful for coastal defense, even after 1918. However, The Admiral’s nation has no such weakness. Curious to see if they will actually add the Americans; And I’m happy you hinted at them from my comment earlier. Lastly, I wish i could have but more then one Subscribe button for my Country (favorite UAD/From The Depths) tuber
Yo Stealth, just a little suggestion. While the idea of the "biggest guns" sounds great in the breach. What I have noticed is that the trade off of damage vs. reload leaves you ultra vulnerable to defeat. So, try this on for size. In keeping with the SPIRIT of your doctrine, instead of going a full 20% increase in the size of your guns, go for a 1/2 increase (10%). This will not only increase the effectiveness of your guns at range, it will also keep the reload times to a manageable period. It might also give you the ability to "burn down" large fleets of enemies with fire damage, instead of waiting for AP damage to kill ships (which personally speaking seems to take forever) as HE is much more effective when it has the ability to stack upon itself. This new doctrine might also come in handy with an increase on barrel diameter (8" vs.8.45"). This adds more punch while only increasing reload marginally. Just something to think about. Keep up the good work and keeping Davy Jones'garden full of enemy trash!
I guess the only change I'd like to see is going fully aggressive with the gunnery. Like go in, expend all shells as fast as possible, and try to retreat.
I guess you could've get away with one less funnel since you reducecd the top speed of the Siegfried. It might save you a fair mount of tonnage for guns and armour.
Oh god, pretty soon the British are going to be able to field so many ships they'll be able to build a bridge from Dover to Calais. Who need transports when you have a 100 meter wide highway across the channel?
Stealth: You want to simulate how many ships? Royal Navy: Yes! TBH I don't like those huge battles much myself, not just because of framerate. But that definitely was a target-rich environment!
Series Idea: Compact Ships (naming is bad), Pretty much you have to be confined to treaty size of ships so you can’t make super battleships that just can’t die to add challenge.
If you don't mind my thinking, why don't you build a backbone fleet like CA, CL, DD, and BC that are cheap but effective and just copy and past until you have 100 ships, so that would just be like 40 more ships
That group of Brits you highlighted was actually onlya 7th of their fleet. 21 ships. Not sure why the game doesn't automatically break up fleets above a certain threshold. Even a human couldn't manage a 141-ship task force effectively.
In 1942, Donitz came closer to eliminating the UK than anyone else. In that year, the German Navy sank over 1000 ships, sending over 5 million tons of cargo to the bottom. In one convoy, 430 brand new tanks went under. The UK had to make more cargo than the Germans could sink, and hope some got through. I feel like people don't talk about Admiral Donitz enough. Hitler made Donitz "Fuhrer" in the event of his death, that's an indicator of his esteem.
diesel engines arent worth it on battleships. the HP/t is just way too small. you should always stick with geared turbines until you can get Gas Turbines, those have the same trade offs as diesels but are just 3 times as efficient.
And that is the reason why you need a lot more torpedos .🤣 You cant miss with that at this point! And even if the game is stuttering please send this entire fleet to David Jones locker!
True I had a game where I (British) had maybe 50 ships fighting a German force of maybe 60 ships. I won, which i wasnt expecting, as i was still _very_ new to the game (wasnt even a week after i first installed it), but i did suffer quite a few casualties. Still enjoyed it tho
We may see sooner rather than later the infamous "Warship-number" names popping up as the game is not reclycling the names of sunken and/or scrapped ships.
Or they limit the size of the battles on the campaign or they improve a lot IA performance. Seems to be a CPU issue (just guessing) but I do not blame them, making the IA multi-threaded may be the way to go but is not an easy task and may introduce other issues.
You deliberately avoiding the adjacency accuracy bug? That large fleet battle was ripe with easy targets. Instead of aiming at the guys in front, the crowded guys in the back would have been sunk 3x over.
Question in regards to secondaries. If you have enemies on both sides of you, do the secondaries engage targets on both sides? Or does it just do one target for each gun type?
23:10 the thing is, that even a top end CPU wouldn't do the game any good. This Game runs in a single thread only. Meaning my 6 core - 12 thread i7 8700k is utilized with 12.5% at max. Good luck simulating big battles like that. The devs should either work on multi-threading (look into the Unity Job System) or limiting the amount of ships.
I do agree with the extremely large battles, the game should have some sort of limit on how many can be in one engagement. I'm just not sure how the devs would change that. For example, do they make it so AI fleets can't be in the same encounter range as another fleet? If they do that, then you would probably have more of those lone destroyer encounters, which also isn't the most fun thing to play/watch. Do they limit the size of AI fleets? Well then there's nothing stopping fleets from joining up and making a massive blob again. I'm not saying there's no solution, im just not sure what the solution could be without creating another issue
Okay, so now that you are moving away from the biggest guns on every ship, I assume you will research the 20" to mk.2 at least before using them. I'm just wondering what you will be able to build with that 150000t BB if you go for the biggest dual barrel guns. Death Star Bismarck anyone? If only you could research larger secondary guns for the bigger ships.
38:26 I see the Brits are taking the Russian approach to war. Overwhelm the enemy with sheer numbers of what should be cheap units, but are actually overly expensive and completely ineffective.
In my opinion the newer design don't fit the biggest guns only doctrine. I know the designs are way better but that reduces the challenge of using slow shooting massive guns.
It is just me or the brits are exercising when you show up, thats why they have so many ship in one battle group and quite a number of them already damaged at least that what i want to belive what happen
Remember that time where the heat of the sun was artificially reached by machine for a couple seconds? I think that pales in comparison to the horrors of an angry computer fan spinning at the speed of light to try to relieve the computer of heat.
I believe WWI was the one mainly against France. WWII mainly against Italy. Now this would be WWIII. Although as the Italian war hasnt really ended i feel is more an extension of WWII
I have an idea for your next campaign while playing as the British you must use the American doctrine (lots of powerful guns three to four main turrets and loads of multiple sized secondary guns)
@@Stealth17Gaming hey I was thinking do you think that you could rebuild the super battleship from your intro in this campaign as I am curious on how it would perform
What system specs are you running? I'm looking to build a pc and I play alot of games with mass units being generated, curious how beefy my system should be.
23:00 Yeah, not many can afford over a thousand quid for just the graphics card not to mention a power supply to feed such watt-hog beasts, and have enough left for the rest of the stuff needed to make a functioning PC, lol. P.S. For anyone reading this in the future and not in the know, there was a major crypto mining scalping of graphics cards back when the RTX20 and RTX30 cards came out, and prices as of typing this have yet to return to remotely affordable levels for us mere peasants that can't write off GPUs as a business expense. I'm still using a GTX1070(non-Ti) as I simply refuse to pay more than I get a month before bills or multiple times what the rest of a PC costs to build for a single component, lol.
The game should limit the battle with the number it can handle properly. I think the issue with big battle like this is it becomes unwatchable due to extreme stutters. I also find it weird, what kind of captain not launching torp into the middle of formation, and instead of calculate single ship trajectory, causing it to miss entirely ....
“Relations with the British have now deteriorated to the point where war is unavoidable” Was this not because you’ve practically been sticking your middle finger up at them for the last few months?
![Ultimate Admiral: Dreadnoughts - [Taskmaster] 663 Barrels, 326700 Shells (Alpha 11)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/MydZG4yGN5s/mqdefault.jpg)
"This upcoming war with the British was entirely avoidable. In our previous war we had the British dead to right. I had my boot on their neck. All I had to do was twist my foot and the British empire would have ceased to exist."
I for one quite enjoy the battles even with reduced fps.
I also think the fleet size should be their first step in limiting battle size, say a max of 50 per fleet with at 100 total ship max in battle.
Besides, real battles basically never exceeded 100 anyway, with some three exceptions out of thousands.
That said you continue to benefit from war with the British so why kill them off
Posted 1 day ago? Jeez that means u hid the vid for a day!
@@bananas1350 yes it's called scheduling.
@@bananas1350 lol he has a set plan for this series im sure he does for all of them
"I wouldn't give ten cents for a politician"
I don't even know what's Stealth and what is the Admirals persona at this point, but I love it
Let's say we share this opinion, the Admiral and I
@@Stealth17Gaming It seems this channel membership is the best investment I made in a long time
British Sea Lord: They can't win against over 140 ships with just 3.
Stealth17: Then it is an even fight.
I love how easily you slip into "the chancellor" character. makes me smile every time😄
What they should do for a battle this size is introduce reinforcements at certain increments. An initial engagement fleet, and supporting task groups arriving in so many minutes
Great idea!
Either that or a concept from Stellaris - command limit. Each class of ship has a certain cost, and your fleets cannot exceed that cost. So you can plop, say, 10 battleships in a fleet and nothing else, or 30 DDs and nothing else, or any mix thereof. Then tie it to the tech tree as something you can unlock as time goes by. Early eras, smaller fleets. Later eras, larger fleets but not excessively so. With the fleets broken up you still slug it out, but now you're taking that 200v200 battle and making it 4 50v50s.
In modern navel history there have only been, what, 3 battles where the total number of ships was close to, or exceeded, the number of ships fielded by the British in this video. And those battles were waged across a surface area hundreds to thousands of times larger than what is modeled here.
Like Mount and Blade!
So apparently the British plan is to build such a large fleet that they win by crashing the computer
human wave tactics
@@metelmax8597 Human wave tactics are one thing.
Realizing they are in a simulation and trying to crash it with sheer numbers is another lol
Wait does that means they want to comit massive suicide? Woahhh
the british in this playthrough are being controlled by BrotherMunro and his Doomstack strategies lol
@@pdxmarine1430 the british are trying to break containment oh God oh fuck
I'm literally binge watching this series😂😂. It's very good.. keep it up!
Same
The Brit’s war against stealth’s pc begins
Dude! I literally was sitting here watching these every day and I'm thinking this guy has at least 500k. Your content is really good! keep it up! Watching these religiously like I do jingles
High praise to be compared to Jingles!
@@Stealth17Gaming honestly his related video feed is how I found you. And I found all the games I enjoy playing/can play from him. Going to build my own PC/or buy it because I'm lazy and try this game out. They should bring it to Xbox. I think it could do fine.
Unlike jingles he gets the ships right
New sub here. I know it's an "old" campaign, I just wanted to let you know that I'm enjoying it immensely, particularly the Admiral's Log and the way you weave a story into the campaign.
And your ridiculous "meme" ships, although they turn out usually to be not all that ridiculous once they meet the enemy. Your designs have taught me a lot about what can and cannot be done in the design screen, which is one of my favorite aspects of this game. Mostly, though, it has given me ideas that I would have never thought of myself!
Anyway, just thought you should know. Keep up the good work!
Thanks, appreciate it :)
I have a suggestion for the dev's on limiting ships in battles (i had one with 730ish enemy vessels earlier, at only a handful of fps (it was also roughly 80% of the enemy's total ships)) , write it off as how many ships were able to actually gather/muster for the battle before the engagement began. You could base it on the maneuver warfare tech and/or the radio technology (as well as what radios you've equipped on your ship to make them more valuable). The more ships you have the more likely some are to miss the battle as they can't properly coordinate (considering the range circles that are supposed to represent where a fleet is projecting power it could be the fleet is spread out with elements scouting or working in smaller groups). It would make it as if elements of both fleets were clashing as they found one another. This would also leave room for ships to potentially arrive late to the battle as reinforcements. Anyway , the higher the tech the more ships should be able to reliably arrive in good order, but there should still be a ceiling even with max tech. (thinking something of a logarithmic curve)
The Admiral Logs again. They are absolutely amazing keep up the great writing! Also there is a game called Buccaneers! that is really interesting. There are ships to buy and bounties to collect plus an amazing story line. The content is limited, you only really need 10 hours to play the full game. But its a fun game with trading and crew mechanics and is a really interesting game to play. Please check it out it fits the content here pretty well.
Oh yes, glory to the slideshow presentation of the battle.
I agree there has to be a set limit for how many ships can be in a battle at once. Also I'd like to see an option at campaign start to adjust the overall economy (something similar to Rule the Waves has). I just prefer smaller fleets to play with.
All these series made my year thank you
i legit sit and wait at around 6 pm for this to come out i love it
the fact that he's going full WOWS German bb is scary.... for his enemies.
Technically even scarier when you convert the 8 inches to mm. It's not 140 or 152 mm secondaries. It's 203 mm. Straight up primary gun size of WOWS high tier cruisers. (Assuming you mean World of Warships)
@@sadsastic he should take 220mm guns as secondaries. Petros bias would be with him😂
@@fuchsschnitzel3007 don't forgert improved penetragion angles. ;P
Well…he is playing as Germany
@@sadsastic I do mean World pf Warships. (Sorry for bot replying “sooner”)
Don't belittle yourself. When you're outnumbered an astonishing 47-to-1 and the game offers to allow you to "end battle" early, and you decline the chance... and then you go on to sink three of those enemy ships without losing any of your own? Yeah, that's when they start speaking your name in the same tones that are usually reserved for Nelson, Yi Sun-Sin, or Nimitz.
As a thought for a future campaign: luxury liners the navy. All and only cruisers (cruise ships) with maximum crew quarters. Bonus points for long cruises, though of course there must be something for those only looking for a week long getaway.
I would like to give the Wurttenbergs some credit; in the case of historical Kaiserliche Marina, the High Seas Fleet was critically low on oil, so the older coal fired ships were very much useful for coastal defense, even after 1918. However, The Admiral’s nation has no such weakness.
Curious to see if they will actually add the Americans; And I’m happy you hinted at them from my comment earlier.
Lastly, I wish i could have but more then one Subscribe button for my Country (favorite UAD/From The Depths) tuber
Yo Stealth, just a little suggestion. While the idea of the "biggest guns" sounds great in the breach. What I have noticed is that the trade off of damage vs. reload leaves you ultra vulnerable to defeat. So, try this on for size. In keeping with the SPIRIT of your doctrine, instead of going a full 20% increase in the size of your guns, go for a 1/2 increase (10%). This will not only increase the effectiveness of your guns at range, it will also keep the reload times to a manageable period. It might also give you the ability to "burn down" large fleets of enemies with fire damage, instead of waiting for AP damage to kill ships (which personally speaking seems to take forever) as HE is much more effective when it has the ability to stack upon itself. This new doctrine might also come in handy with an increase on barrel diameter (8" vs.8.45"). This adds more punch while only increasing reload marginally. Just something to think about. Keep up the good work and keeping Davy Jones'garden full of enemy trash!
19:08 Authentic historic reaction, of german military naval command.
13:00 should have put 16" on the sides of that one funnel. Would have looked cool, that's for sure ^^
31:09
The average Wows German BB captain, just trying to get into torpedo range😂
enjoying the episodes
I woulda sacrificed a cruiser to make all the DDs to send their torps and see how much friendly fire there would be
What you need are a CL class torpedo spammer with oxygen torps. Something that can fire 20 torps a salvo. That'll teach the brits about fleet sizes
I didn't say that you needed torpedoes. I just said that you needed something to un cluster the fuck
I guess the only change I'd like to see is going fully aggressive with the gunnery. Like go in, expend all shells as fast as possible, and try to retreat.
I won't lie, it is very slow, but I like seeing the brits go up in flames
And in the next episode we watch as Stealth's computer catches fire lol.. just kidding 😜
I guess you could've get away with one less funnel since you reducecd the top speed of the Siegfried. It might save you a fair mount of tonnage for guns and armour.
Now that's a torpedo target rich target
Oh god, pretty soon the British are going to be able to field so many ships they'll be able to build a bridge from Dover to Calais. Who need transports when you have a 100 meter wide highway across the channel?
UAD: you cant have more then 100 ships in the skrimish mode
Players: Thats true for the campaign too right?
UAD: >->
Players: RIGHT?
Rip stealth's pc in the coming battles. 🙏
Stealth: You want to simulate how many ships?
Royal Navy: Yes!
TBH I don't like those huge battles much myself, not just because of framerate.
But that definitely was a target-rich environment!
Series Idea: Compact Ships (naming is bad), Pretty much you have to be confined to treaty size of ships so you can’t make super battleships that just can’t die to add challenge.
Stealth when outnumbered by somewhere on the order of 50 to 1:
"I'll take these odds."
lol
If you don't mind my thinking, why don't you build a backbone fleet like CA, CL, DD, and BC that are cheap but effective and just copy and past until you have 100 ships, so that would just be like 40 more ships
makes me wonder what the theoretically maximum size 1 fleet could possibly be before the logistical requirements become to much to supply the fleet.
They came back For round two
Remember to replenish your crew pool.
That group of Brits you highlighted was actually onlya 7th of their fleet. 21 ships. Not sure why the game doesn't automatically break up fleets above a certain threshold. Even a human couldn't manage a 141-ship task force effectively.
In 1942, Donitz came closer to eliminating the UK than anyone else. In that year, the German Navy sank over 1000 ships, sending over 5 million tons of cargo to the bottom. In one convoy, 430 brand new tanks went under. The UK had to make more cargo than the Germans could sink, and hope some got through. I feel like people don't talk about Admiral Donitz enough. Hitler made Donitz "Fuhrer" in the event of his death, that's an indicator of his esteem.
diesel engines arent worth it on battleships. the HP/t is just way too small. you should always stick with geared turbines until you can get Gas Turbines, those have the same trade offs as diesels but are just 3 times as efficient.
Awesome !
I feel like for your first design in the video you could’ve done the German Richelieu
Perks of my new job, 1. Better pay more hours 2. I go in at 3 am and get off in time for a new episode in the series before I go to bed
Congrats on the new job!
@@Stealth17Gaming thanks, I’m enjoying it a lot it’s hard work but it’s definitely worth it
Should get a pair of those color blind glasses cause he keep saying "This won't turn" when it shows a good LOS cone....
oh hey it's the experance I had with like a 20 v 20 battle in 1890 on my own potato of a PC
That bb is almost 3 American football fields long and a half of a football field wide
And that is the reason why you need a lot more torpedos .🤣 You cant miss with that at this point! And even if the game is stuttering please send this entire fleet to David Jones locker!
200+ ships now that is way too much even for them.
12:00
Fucking dead 🤣🤣
"Wat the fuk"
with such big fleets even NASA-computers would struggle xD
6:54 Big Chungus. That's a LOT of ship.
Is it possible to explain what affects the Pitch and roll please? and in turn, what effect that has on Gun performance.
Pitch and roll makes you whole crew sick and forces them to go throw back loool
PS: its just for fun purpose, dont take it too seriously pls thx ;)
Its not overpriced CA, its sarcastic Dido.
“Low fps fest” that’s my computer trying to run anything other than solitaire
At this point Thuringa is literally the Flagship of the German Navy....
The Britain be like: HAHA WARSHIPS GOES BRRRRRRRRRRRR
I fought against 100 ships with like 12, got 60 kills then noped out cuz my PC was just dying
What about a Battleship with 2 biggest quads up front with 11 inch guns in the back to create a Super Richelieu?
The big battles are fun, better when your not so heavily outnumbered
True
I had a game where I (British) had maybe 50 ships fighting a German force of maybe 60 ships. I won, which i wasnt expecting, as i was still _very_ new to the game (wasnt even a week after i first installed it), but i did suffer quite a few casualties.
Still enjoyed it tho
We may see sooner rather than later the infamous "Warship-number" names popping up as the game is not reclycling the names of sunken and/or scrapped ships.
it's popped up in every nation besides mine. The British in my campaign have ceased to exist.
Or they limit the size of the battles on the campaign or they improve a lot IA performance. Seems to be a CPU issue (just guessing) but I do not blame them, making the IA multi-threaded may be the way to go but is not an easy task and may introduce other issues.
I hope you're able to force them to give you Ireland this time around.
It's time to teach the British a very hard lessen
I just wanna see the Loki fight, LOL
You deliberately avoiding the adjacency accuracy bug? That large fleet battle was ripe with easy targets. Instead of aiming at the guys in front, the crowded guys in the back would have been sunk 3x over.
Should have gotten the longer barrels on. Your new ships
Question in regards to secondaries. If you have enemies on both sides of you, do the secondaries engage targets on both sides? Or does it just do one target for each gun type?
23:10 the thing is, that even a top end CPU wouldn't do the game any good. This Game runs in a single thread only. Meaning my 6 core - 12 thread i7 8700k is utilized with 12.5% at max. Good luck simulating big battles like that.
The devs should either work on multi-threading (look into the Unity Job System) or limiting the amount of ships.
Wrong tactic, Stealth. Lob hot metal into the pack. The worse your chance to hit is, the more damage you inflict. ;)
I wonder if he still has ships sitting in Cypress.
I do agree with the extremely large battles, the game should have some sort of limit on how many can be in one engagement. I'm just not sure how the devs would change that. For example, do they make it so AI fleets can't be in the same encounter range as another fleet? If they do that, then you would probably have more of those lone destroyer encounters, which also isn't the most fun thing to play/watch. Do they limit the size of AI fleets? Well then there's nothing stopping fleets from joining up and making a massive blob again. I'm not saying there's no solution, im just not sure what the solution could be without creating another issue
Okay, so now that you are moving away from the biggest guns on every ship, I assume you will research the 20" to mk.2 at least before using them. I'm just wondering what you will be able to build with that 150000t BB if you go for the biggest dual barrel guns. Death Star Bismarck anyone? If only you could research larger secondary guns for the bigger ships.
I need to research bigger guns before I can make them useful.
38:26
I see the Brits are taking the Russian approach to war. Overwhelm the enemy with sheer numbers of what should be cheap units, but are actually overly expensive and completely ineffective.
Would've just spammed torpedoes against the 100+ ships odds would be in favor lol
Just seen the full.map with all nations is coming in the next patch. !!
Supposedly, yes.
advanced tech-- AA cruiser
In my opinion the newer design don't fit the biggest guns only doctrine. I know the designs are way better but that reduces the challenge of using slow shooting massive guns.
hey stealth, i was wondering what battleship in the intro of all your UAD videos is?
I think I built it only for the intro video. Don't think I used it in a video
@@Stealth17Gaming ah ok
It is just me or the brits are exercising when you show up, thats why they have so many ship in one battle group and quite a number of them already damaged at least that what i want to belive what happen
As a proud owner of a GTX 750 of a videocard, I enjoy this low-fps fest ;)
I wonder how hot the room with the PC got at that first battle...
I think he melted lol
Cpu was bored actually. As was the gpu. It's the game that just runs slow.
Remember that time where the heat of the sun was artificially reached by machine for a couple seconds? I think that pales in comparison to the horrors of an angry computer fan spinning at the speed of light to try to relieve the computer of heat.
Wait did I miss when WW2 happened in this campaign
I think this is the third war against the British, and a major one
I believe WWI was the one mainly against France. WWII mainly against Italy. Now this would be WWIII. Although as the Italian war hasnt really ended i feel is more an extension of WWII
I have an idea for your next campaign while playing as the British you must use the American doctrine (lots of powerful guns three to four main turrets and loads of multiple sized secondary guns)
Already have something else planned for the next campaign
@@Stealth17Gaming ahh thats right you were thinking of a campaign with shotguns how about maybe using my idea for the one after?
@@stevelenox152 A firestarter with smaller ships
@@Stealth17Gaming ahh my bad well I look forward to seeing who you wipe out your opponents
@@Stealth17Gaming hey I was thinking do you think that you could rebuild the super battleship from your intro in this campaign as I am curious on how it would perform
What system specs are you running? I'm looking to build a pc and I play alot of games with mass units being generated, curious how beefy my system should be.
Listed in the description
They onlie send 140 somting Ships becose they whantet to kill the last Thuringa becos of it's legendary status.
Sorry for the bad English.
How could you step away from the biggest guns doctrine? That's the whole point of the campaign!
If you don't adapt to the enemy then there's no point.
One less more to follow. Ahoj (Hello in Czech)
Dose the game actually used all 12 cores because if it only uses like 4 cores u might have done slightly better with a higher speed cores
23:00 Yeah, not many can afford over a thousand quid for just the graphics card not to mention a power supply to feed such watt-hog beasts, and have enough left for the rest of the stuff needed to make a functioning PC, lol.
P.S. For anyone reading this in the future and not in the know, there was a major crypto mining scalping of graphics cards back when the RTX20 and RTX30 cards came out, and prices as of typing this have yet to return to remotely affordable levels for us mere peasants that can't write off GPUs as a business expense. I'm still using a GTX1070(non-Ti) as I simply refuse to pay more than I get a month before bills or multiple times what the rest of a PC costs to build for a single component, lol.
so the MEME design bureaus is still making ship that why it so unconventional
Yes
Yes
Yes
Ja
Oui
6:03 Nothing personnal mate but WHAT ON EARTH IS THAT?
Anything you don't understand is usually art
volume?
The game should limit the battle with the number it can handle properly. I think the issue with big battle like this is it becomes unwatchable due to extreme stutters. I also find it weird, what kind of captain not launching torp into the middle of formation, and instead of calculate single ship trajectory, causing it to miss entirely ....
Interstingly enough Custom Battle only allows max 100 ships.
“Relations with the British have now deteriorated to the point where war is unavoidable”
Was this not because you’ve practically been sticking your middle finger up at them for the last few months?
Perhaps
@@Stealth17Gaming I love these videos dude, keep it up! :3