Glad I wasn't the only one who struggled with the green shirt guy to the point I skipped past when he was talking. Thankfully the main presenter was excellent.
i still feel that i have had probably had punctures that have sealed on the lower pressure on my road tubeless (75psi) that would have had me changing tubes on the side of the road and that yes i have had a couple of times when getting the tire to seal a bigger hole was a problem. but on balance i'm still pro tubeless - lower pressure, more comfort, the set up faff is getting less with experience. ...and how many times have you changed a tube when it is dark and wet and cold only to puncture a few minutes later because that pesky sharp object or sharp edged hole in the tyre has it in for you.....
I've said elsewhere that Tubeless for road only works if you run approx 30mm tyres (maybe 28mm). Anything smaller is less suitable as you need to run higher pressures, which sort of makes tubeless pointless.
Before you throw away your tubeless tires take a look at them when you take them off and see how many punctures you had that you didn't even notice. Every time I've taken my tubeless GP 5000s off using Stan's sealant, I've found at least five places where the sealant had sealed a puncture I'd have had to stop for if I'd been running tubes. Also, I was doing 40 MPH on a downhill and got a cut on the sidewall of my front tire. I heard the same sound you'd here when flatting a tubed tire but as the pressure came down to the point where the sealant was it slowed dramatically and gave me plenty of time to come to a safe stop. Much better than I'd expected. When it comes to punctures there's hardly any better example of how statistics are lumpy. I've run the same kinds of tires for years - once I found the one I liked, I stuck with it - but there have been times when I've worn a tire completely out without even one flat but then put the same kind of tire on and had three flats on the same ride.
I'll stick with tubes. Get a puncture and I can swap a tube in about 5 minutes. I've reused patched tubes multiple times with no issues. No need to worry about the age of the sealant either.
Tubeless is not ready for road bikes yet. I have had two punctures that didn’t seal. I’m now back on clinchers with latex tubes and cotton 320 tpi tyres, they are lighter and have less rolling resistance.
I get a puncture only once or twice a year. The extra hassle of tubeless is not worth it to me. The low pressures necessary for hookless rims is also not desirable.
In the discussion of the glucose sensors and UCI rules no one seems to mention the no needles rule. This is an invasive sensor using a (very small) needle. Seems worth mentioning.
One tip, put sealant in a latex tube and run clinchers. Much cleaner and it actually works for punctures and pinch. Beyond that I don’t know why use tubeless setup
Glucose monitoring during a ride is critical, low blood sugar can lead to seizures. I'd like to review the UCI ban to see if allows for a medical waiver for type-2 diabetics or individuals that suffer from hypoglycemia.
I´m sorry about Michelle´s tubeless experience because mine has been life changing. I never got stranded again or spent money or time around punctured tires\tubes and at the moment I´ve 303 Firecrest with Pirelli´s TLR SL 28C. Since February: over 6000Km with incredible low rolling resistance bliss(4.8\4.5BAR pressure). Honestly I NEVER had a tire seating or puncture episode. PS: I came from DT Swiss 1800´s with GP5000 28/25c rear/front tires and never had an issue riding or maintaining.
Delivery wasn't up to scratch. On a recorded segment that's not good enough. "um" and "yeah" made it unwatchable and I really wanted to hear the good and the bad points of the hub gear system and eg whether or not they were going to integrate into the Shimano system by a wireless sender plugged in to the existing di2 lever switches.
No tubes for me ever again! Tubeless has saved my ride twice since I've converted. The smaller one sealed up and the bigger one I used a dart plug. Took me less than 20 secs to plug the larger hole. Don't know why I would want to waste 5 minutes or more with a tube. That should be last last resort
I was wondering if anyone had tried that. Can’t tell if you’re joking or not! Only because I thought tubeless required special valves to insert the sealant, which you’d not find on any innertube (my v limited tubeless knowledge is solely from internet bike sites, I should add).
@@jgogl9791 Its not a joke and it works. You can remove presta valves with a presta valve key and put the sealant in, put the valve back in and pump it up.
Will be sticking with my P Zero and Michelin Pro4 clinchers for road use. Tubeless too much hassle if you get a puncture while you're out unless you had race support for a quick wheel change (which most riders don't have 99% of the time). Puncture a clincher and generally you're back up and running in well under 5 minutes with a tube swap.
I've had tubeless for 2 months now. It's saved my rides twice so far in the middle of nowhere. Put a dartplug in for the bigger punctures and I'm good in less than 20secs. Lol
You never know with tubeless until you put it on that could be a nightmare or easy and when you hit a broken bottle with slices in tire, need a large patch to get home…. Which I carry now… good points yet standards change each year. I recently got a bike with mavic rims.. another standard that moving along well just a lot of information and frustration. I have learned to carry a patch due to hitting glass … and putting tubeless on is almost the opposite of a tube due to the tight fit and concave center of rim…. Oh well things are changing now.. I think it’s important to ride a 1972 Holdsworth once a year. Batteries drive me nuts di2 very seldom charge on single chain ring. Well think of this a friend got a new bike first ride the batteries failed and two flats with a bad tubless set up…
Please Give these presenters a break. They are journalists and not professional on-camera talent. The folks at CW are our agents in the field trying to cut through the product and tech BS that the brands are shoving down our throats. They approach their clips with analytical and critical thought. They are like the NPR of cycling repertoire un-sensationalized and honest with very few product feature they have to do to keep the doors opened. I would rather have presenters that are slightly stilted and uncomfortable on-camera. I trust that a bit more and perceive it as being less like entertainment and more like journalism.
powershift hub - great solution for a problem that doesn't really exist. Get your front mech set up properly and it shouldn't ever be a problem. Why spend a couple of grand on a glorified sturmey archer hub that will just add weight to your bike? See also... disc brakes, tubeless tyres etc etc
These fancy hubs are a half-measure in my opinion. Just give us a cassette with 12-13 gears with proper ratios for a 1X system of just do a good gearbox that doesn't weight 2kg.
What if we banned all the added cost items (power meters, race radios, sensors and such tech) in the pro men's teams and transferred the savings to the women's salaries? Additionally, I find the logic of previously approved hi cost tech used as justification for adding more cost to teams to be a non-argument. But then the cycling review industry is the right arm of the cycling industry which has never reviewed a piece of gear they actually criticized or said was just plain unneeded. The discussion on road tubeless was an example of this - nothing of substance added to the discussion - Did they actually end up recommending against road tubeless or are they just confused? The objective of channels like this is only to help you rationalize spending more money and to keep spinning the $$ flywheel round and round. Beware the cycling marketing machine and its minions. It takes a lot less $$ than you think to get out and be fast on a bike. I would love to see channels like this provide knowledge to people on how to avoid buying new stuff/gear - show some examples of people riding 9 speed mech, rim brake, steel/AL bikes and kicking ass against $12000 carbon, disc, electronic bikes. But yeah, I like buying new stuff too, but I also love showing up with my CAAD10, mech rim brake bike and having no issues keeping up (basically the same tech as my 1987 Cannondale SR2000). 😂😂
"like..yeah, like...yeah yeah...like....like...yeah, like...yeah yeah...like..like..yeah, like...yeah yeah...like..like..yeah, like...yeah yeah...like" Dude...get some vocabulary so you don't have to depend on so many crutches.
Yeah like ,yeah like,yeah like ............
Couldn’t take any more turned down to write this son of Boris take his coke away
Yeah was driving me 🤪 nuts.. And umm
...he needs to get some more vocabulary so he doesn't have to use so many "yeah", "like" cutches.
Glad I wasn't the only one who struggled with the green shirt guy to the point I skipped past when he was talking. Thankfully the main presenter was excellent.
...and get some more vocabulary so he doesn't have to use so many "yeah", "like" cutches.
Holy cow, green shirt guy needs to slow down and take a breath.
...and get some more vocabulary so he doesn't have to use so many "yeah", "like" cutches.
..... +1 seriously... very distracting...
Had a contest to take a shot every time someone said "yeah". We ran out of booze...
Yeah!
There’s no cap on that rear mech cable! O…M…G!
i still feel that i have had probably had punctures that have sealed on the lower pressure on my road tubeless (75psi) that would have had me changing tubes on the side of the road and that yes i have had a couple of times when getting the tire to seal a bigger hole was a problem. but on balance i'm still pro tubeless - lower pressure, more comfort, the set up faff is getting less with experience. ...and how many times have you changed a tube when it is dark and wet and cold only to puncture a few minutes later because that pesky sharp object or sharp edged hole in the tyre has it in for you.....
I've said elsewhere that Tubeless for road only works if you run approx 30mm tyres (maybe 28mm). Anything smaller is less suitable as you need to run higher pressures, which sort of makes tubeless pointless.
Before you throw away your tubeless tires take a look at them when you take them off and see how many punctures you had that you didn't even notice. Every time I've taken my tubeless GP 5000s off using Stan's sealant, I've found at least five places where the sealant had sealed a puncture I'd have had to stop for if I'd been running tubes. Also, I was doing 40 MPH on a downhill and got a cut on the sidewall of my front tire. I heard the same sound you'd here when flatting a tubed tire but as the pressure came down to the point where the sealant was it slowed dramatically and gave me plenty of time to come to a safe stop. Much better than I'd expected. When it comes to punctures there's hardly any better example of how statistics are lumpy. I've run the same kinds of tires for years - once I found the one I liked, I stuck with it - but there have been times when I've worn a tire completely out without even one flat but then put the same kind of tire on and had three flats on the same ride.
Guy was nervous and yeah mmm that’s all. Great vídeo!
Yes,, I’m all for new tech. The front chainring / mech system has always been a tech conundrum...
I'll stick with tubes. Get a puncture and I can swap a tube in about 5 minutes. I've reused patched tubes multiple times with no issues. No need to worry about the age of the sealant either.
Tubeless is not ready for road bikes yet. I have had two punctures that didn’t seal. I’m now back on clinchers with latex tubes and cotton 320 tpi tyres, they are lighter and have less rolling resistance.
I get a puncture only once or twice a year. The extra hassle of tubeless is not worth it to me. The low pressures necessary for hookless rims is also not desirable.
In the discussion of the glucose sensors and UCI rules no one seems to mention the no needles rule. This is an invasive sensor using a (very small) needle. Seems worth mentioning.
If that guy would stop saying "Yuh" and "yeah" and "umm" between every other word, this video would be 3 minutes long!
One tip, put sealant in a latex tube and run clinchers. Much cleaner and it actually works for punctures and pinch. Beyond that I don’t know why use tubeless setup
How do you get the sealant into the inner tube?
@@jgogl9791 remove the tube inner core and add sealant in it. Put the core afterwards.
Sometimes it gets sticky when inflating
Glucose monitoring during a ride is critical, low blood sugar can lead to seizures. I'd like to review the UCI ban to see if allows for a medical waiver for type-2 diabetics or individuals that suffer from hypoglycemia.
Um yeah Subtitles. Thank you subtitles… um.
Most amateurs cannot afford a Dogma F. Should the UCI ban that as well???
Yes, for being hideous
He sounds totally drunk if you alter the playback speed to 0.25 😂 and generally makes more sense 😉
I´m sorry about Michelle´s tubeless experience because mine has been life changing. I never got stranded again or spent money or time around punctured tires\tubes and at the moment I´ve 303 Firecrest with Pirelli´s TLR SL 28C. Since February: over 6000Km with incredible low rolling resistance bliss(4.8\4.5BAR pressure). Honestly I NEVER had a tire seating or puncture episode.
PS: I came from DT Swiss 1800´s with GP5000 28/25c rear/front tires and never had an issue riding or maintaining.
Do diabetic riders get a TUE for a glucose tracker?
Excellent question
@@matthewlewis2072 I guess they would have to as isn’t there a whole diabetic team
Delivery wasn't up to scratch. On a recorded segment that's not good enough. "um" and "yeah" made it unwatchable and I really wanted to hear the good and the bad points of the hub gear system and eg whether or not they were going to integrate into the Shimano system by a wireless sender plugged in to the existing di2 lever switches.
No tubes for me ever again! Tubeless has saved my ride twice since I've converted. The smaller one sealed up and the bigger one I used a dart plug. Took me less than 20 secs to plug the larger hole. Don't know why I would want to waste 5 minutes or more with a tube. That should be last last resort
I remember reading her article and was thinking yeah I'll probably stick to tubes and levers for the time being
I use tubes and tyres and put sealant in my tubes, best of both with just a small weight penalty
I was wondering if anyone had tried that. Can’t tell if you’re joking or not! Only because I thought tubeless required special valves to insert the sealant, which you’d not find on any innertube (my v limited tubeless knowledge is solely from internet bike sites, I should add).
@@jgogl9791 Its not a joke and it works. You can remove presta valves with a presta valve key and put the sealant in, put the valve back in and pump it up.
@@jgogl9791 www.cyclingweekly.com/videos/cycling-tech/how-to-puncture-proof-your-tyres
@@beastiecarrion oh I see, thanks for the info and the reply.
really annoying two watch, erm but yeah...
Agree, that's shocking to listen too. Hopefully he listens to himself and tries to improve. And um but yeah !
Will be sticking with my P Zero and Michelin Pro4 clinchers for road use. Tubeless too much hassle if you get a puncture while you're out unless you had race support for a quick wheel change (which most riders don't have 99% of the time). Puncture a clincher and generally you're back up and running in well under 5 minutes with a tube swap.
I've had tubeless for 2 months now. It's saved my rides twice so far in the middle of nowhere. Put a dartplug in for the bigger punctures and I'm good in less than 20secs. Lol
Would like to know more about the classified hub but couldn’t listen to this guy
@@topgun52 I get it but why do you care so much to comment and reply multiple times about the same criticism
GCN released a video on this Classified Hub 3 months ago if you want more info.
You never know with tubeless until you put it on that could be a nightmare or easy and when you hit a broken bottle with slices in tire, need a large patch to get home…. Which I carry now… good points yet standards change each year. I recently got a bike with mavic rims.. another standard that moving along well just a lot of information and frustration. I have learned to carry a patch due to hitting glass … and putting tubeless on is almost the opposite of a tube due to the tight fit and concave center of rim…. Oh well things are changing now.. I think it’s important to ride a 1972 Holdsworth once a year. Batteries drive me nuts di2 very seldom charge on single chain ring. Well think of this a friend got a new bike first ride the batteries failed and two flats with a bad tubless set up…
Please Give these presenters a break. They are journalists and not professional on-camera talent. The folks at CW are our agents in the field trying to cut through the product and tech BS that the brands are shoving down our throats. They approach their clips with analytical and critical thought. They are like the NPR of cycling repertoire un-sensationalized and honest with very few product feature they have to do to keep the doors opened. I would rather have presenters that are slightly stilted and uncomfortable on-camera. I trust that a bit more and perceive it as being less like entertainment and more like journalism.
Yeah
true
Well done 😄
But erm yeah
agree
Stefan,
You must be German(you keep saying 'yeah')!
powershift hub - great solution for a problem that doesn't really exist. Get your front mech set up properly and it shouldn't ever be a problem. Why spend a couple of grand on a glorified sturmey archer hub that will just add weight to your bike? See also... disc brakes, tubeless tyres etc etc
I'd like it on my mid-motor ebike conversion... But I'd want a mechanical one.
Theres a budget cap in f1, it should be a thing in pro cycling if uci wants to make it fair for everyone.
These fancy hubs are a half-measure in my opinion. Just give us a cassette with 12-13 gears with proper ratios for a 1X system of just do a good gearbox that doesn't weight 2kg.
Green shirt guy needs to drink more coffee. And please get him to talk faster... we don't have all day
Tubes and rim brakes for me. If it aint broke........
Steel rims, yeah? Down tube shifters, of course...or still on fixed? 🤣
Any luck suing Hambini? Thought not.
5:16 when you buy a rohloff on wish
What if we banned all the added cost items (power meters, race radios, sensors and such tech) in the pro men's teams and transferred the savings to the women's salaries?
Additionally, I find the logic of previously approved hi cost tech used as justification for adding more cost to teams to be a non-argument.
But then the cycling review industry is the right arm of the cycling industry which has never reviewed a piece of gear they actually criticized or said was just plain unneeded. The discussion on road tubeless was an example of this - nothing of substance added to the discussion - Did they actually end up recommending against road tubeless or are they just confused?
The objective of channels like this is only to help you rationalize spending more money and to keep spinning the $$ flywheel round and round. Beware the cycling marketing machine and its minions. It takes a lot less $$ than you think to get out and be fast on a bike. I would love to see channels like this provide knowledge to people on how to avoid buying new stuff/gear - show some examples of people riding 9 speed mech, rim brake, steel/AL bikes and kicking ass against $12000 carbon, disc, electronic bikes. But yeah, I like buying new stuff too, but I also love showing up with my CAAD10, mech rim brake bike and having no issues keeping up (basically the same tech as my 1987 Cannondale SR2000). 😂😂
Dear Lord!
Q. "What is a Garmin Edge 830?"
A. "c) a peddle"
"like..yeah, like...yeah yeah...like....like...yeah, like...yeah yeah...like..like..yeah, like...yeah yeah...like..like..yeah, like...yeah yeah...like" Dude...get some vocabulary so you don't have to depend on so many crutches.
Yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah
Jesus, can people just take it easy.
Good content but points need to be planned, thought about, maybe scripted ? I enjoyed the episode and applaud the effort to create better content.
Well done cycling weekly, as if road cycling wasn’t elitist enough have the poshest presenters you could ever find.
In what way do they sound posh? Definitely British but hardly posh. I am guessing that their regional accents don't appeal to you.
In what way is road cycling elitist? Also they’re hardly posh, they’re just normal people doing their best in a presentation and doing a good job.
Elitist? I'm as common as muck 🤣
GCN did a much better video about that hub
Having followed pro cycling for over 40 years I can tell you that reasoning over the ‘logic’ behind decisions of the UCI is a waste of human energy.
love the concept of the show but this was poorly delivered.
It was completely fine. What’s the problem?
Get better sealant.
Just here to point out that disc brakes on a road bike are deeply stupid
Lol nobody wants to see crashes? Its the only interesting part
These presenters are hard to watch
like a very poor man's GCN.
@@DanTuber yeah, but shouldn't be they have been doing this for a while now.
GCN are much much better
@@alexward6416 Agreed. Seems they have no idea how to market themselves.
Out of all the people at CW… you pick Mr yeah, umm, so yea to be a presenter 🤦♂️ maybe he’s a better writer than presenter, let’s hope so!
Ha,ha,ha AGREED!
The guy in the green shirt has a stuttered pattern of speech that is difficult to listen to.
they should ban bikes..some people cannot afford them
so just race on cheap bikes?
Yeah