Spot on. Social inclusion used to be a 'big tent' strategy. We've ended up instead with lots of small tents and active hostility to the notion that they could all come together under one roof.
Erm, the only reason there is such a thing as many 'small tents' is the insistence of some, based on their cultural values and perceptions, to self-isolate and to NOT integrate with the rest of us. It's not the 'British Elites' that cause getthoisation of Pakistani, Bangladeshi, and African immigrants into the country. That may have held some sway 50-60 years ago - a whole generation back, but it certainly doesn't now.
@@AA-yc8yr methinx you're reading this backwards and have missed the all important middle bit. The middle bit being the promotion of multiculturalism which has led, as you say (I paraphrase) to 'some' getting a tad bolshie.
@@AA-yc8yr It certainly was "British elites". They imported the Global South without consultation or democratic consent from the original peoples. They never demanded the new arrivals "integrate" (as if that was possible with such large numbers) either.
As apparently our political class appear to be negligent to the needs of the people - perhaps governing to a 50yr plan. Can we at some point consider recourse against political groups (or state) with the aim to be able to sue for gross negligence, in the present moment. When donors lobby for special interests, they should sign legal papers and become bound by the efforts of chosen party. Since 2008 this country has gone down the pooper and with each consecutive government the situation deteriorates. The losers become celebrated as victors, as they march off into the sunset with a golden handshake…? New rules are required. Aren’t we seeing the globalist monopoly act as if complete governance, assigning countries to best suit the world plan? Our nationhood is seen as an inconvenience - which is effectively assigning us to a future of mass violence and chaos? Is that false? Good video.
Wise and well-read woman.
Intelligent and moral stuff
Spot on. Social inclusion used to be a 'big tent' strategy. We've ended up instead with lots of small tents and active hostility to the notion that they could all come together under one roof.
Erm, the only reason there is such a thing as many 'small tents' is the insistence of some, based on their cultural values and perceptions, to self-isolate and to NOT integrate with the rest of us. It's not the 'British Elites' that cause getthoisation of Pakistani, Bangladeshi, and African immigrants into the country. That may have held some sway 50-60 years ago - a whole generation back, but it certainly doesn't now.
"We've ended up instead" it was deliberate. Migration without integration is colonisation.
@@AA-yc8yr methinx you're reading this backwards and have missed the all important middle bit. The middle bit being the promotion of multiculturalism which has led, as you say (I paraphrase) to 'some' getting a tad bolshie.
@@AA-yc8yr
It certainly was "British elites". They imported the Global South without consultation or democratic consent from the original peoples. They never demanded the new arrivals "integrate" (as if that was possible with such large numbers) either.
@ Me thinks you have no clue what you've written. It's ok, I suspect no one would expect much coherence on your part anyway.
Well said.
As apparently our political class appear to be negligent to the needs of the people - perhaps governing to a 50yr plan.
Can we at some point consider recourse against political groups (or state) with the aim to be able to sue for gross negligence, in the present moment. When donors lobby for special interests, they should sign legal papers and become bound by the efforts of chosen party.
Since 2008 this country has gone down the pooper and with each consecutive government the situation deteriorates. The losers become celebrated as victors, as they march off into the sunset with a golden handshake…?
New rules are required. Aren’t we seeing the globalist monopoly act as if complete governance, assigning countries to best suit the world plan? Our nationhood is seen as an inconvenience - which is effectively assigning us to a future of mass violence and chaos? Is that false?
Good video.
I think that we need a better definition of the "working class", and whether people like Alka Sehgal are included in there.
It's always easiest to blame everyone but yourself.
Stop saying "we're divided"
Because no one is.
What's happened is all groups have been united against Europeans.
Oh please.
That's called distraction, an attempt at derailment. This woman is too smart for you to delegitimize